Skip to main content

Sex-specific DoublesexM expression in subsets of Drosophilasomatic gonad cells



In Drosophila melanogaster, a pre-mRNA splicing hierarchy controls sexual identity and ultimately leads to sex-specific Doublesex (DSX) transcription factor isoforms. The male-specific DSXM represses genes involved in female development and activates genes involved in male development. Spatial and temporal control of dsx during embryogenesis is not well documented.


Here we show that DSXM is specifically expressed in subsets of male somatic gonad cells during embryogenesis. Following testis formation, germ cells remain in contact with DSXM-expressing cells, including hub cells and premeiotic somatic cyst cells that surround germ cells during spermatogenesis in larval and adult testes.


We show that dsx is transcriptionally regulated in addition to being regulated at the pre-mRNA splicing level by the sex determination hierarchy. The dsx locus is spatially controlled by somatic gonad identity. The continuous expression of DSXM in cells contacting the germline suggests an ongoing short-range influence of the somatic sex determination pathway on germ cell development.


A regulatory cascade directs all aspects of somatic sexual differentiation in Drosophila, including somatic gonad formation [13]. This hierarchy is composed of a series of alternative pre-mRNA processing regulators. Diploid flies with two X chromosomes are female (XX:AA) and those with one are male (X:AA). The Sex-lethal (SXL) protein is ubiquitously expressed in early XX:AA embryos and directs female splicing of later appearing Sxl and transformer (tra) pre-mRNA such that functional SXL and TRA proteins are produced only in females. Presence of TRA and the constitutive product of transformer-2 (tra2) in females lead to female-specific splicing of the doublesex (dsx) pre-mRNA, which then gives rise to DSXF protein. In X:AA flies, the absence of SXL, and thus TRA, results in male-specific splicing of dsx pre-mRNA. Male-specific dsx mRNA encodes DSXM protein. Both DSXF and DSXM are zinc-finger transcription factors of the DMRT family. Members of this family play important roles in sex determination in most animals that have been examined to date [4].

The Drosophila DSX proteins possess identical N-terminal DNA-binding domains but differ in their C-termini [57]. DSXM is thought to repress genes that are involved in female development and activate male differentiation genes while DSXF is thought to do the opposite [811]. Although there are a few aspects of sexual dimorphism that are not controlled by DSX, a plethora of phenotypes including elaboration of the abdominal pigmentation, development of the genitalia, sex combs and abdominal neuroblasts, as well as certain aspects of male courtship behavior depend on this important regulator of sexual dimorphism [8, 12, 13].

The dsx locus plays a critical role in both somatic gonad development [14] and specification of germline sexual identity [11, 15]. Flies transformed from females to males by constitutive expression of DSXM have testes but very few germ cells. These germ cells can show evidence of either male or female development. However, dsx is not required within the germline cells, suggesting that the role of dsx in germline development is non-autonomous [16]. Thus, DSX expression is expected in somatic cells that communicate with the germline. Developmental northern blots have shown that there are multiple dsx transcripts in larvae and adults [9]. Despite the importance of dsx in both somatic gonad and germline development, very little is known about when and where DSX is expressed during gonadogenesis.

Gonad development in Drosophila is initiated in the embryo [17]. Germ cells form at the posterior pole of the embryo, divide, are carried into the embryo during gastrulation, migrate through the future gut, and coalesce. Recent work has shown that mesodermal cells from the abdominal region, as well as the germline cells, undergo a well-defined set of migrations to the presumptive gonad and then coalesce into the gonad [1820]. Additional somatic cells, which express SOX100B, are recruited and maintained in the embryonic testis but not in the ovary; these cells are called male-specific somatic gonadal precursors [21]. Following gonad formation, male germline divisions, regulated by the JAK/STAT pathway, begin [22], whereas there are no divisions of female germ cells at this stage.

In this report we show that the male-specific isoform of dsx mRNA is expressed in the embryo. We have developed an antibody that detected the DSXM isoform and show that, in contrast to SXL, which is expressed uniformly throughout the embryo [23, 24], DSXM expression was restricted to the initial somatic cells that form the somatic gonad in male embryos. Furthermore, DSXM is expressed in the male-specific somatic gonadal precursors that are later recruited to the gonad and are maintained in male embryos. DSXM is not detected outside the gonad, in the germ cells, or in the late arriving somatic cells that surround the embryonic testis. Male germ cells are in direct contact with DSXM-expressing somatic cells through adulthood, as DSXM is specifically expressed in the two somatic cyst cells surrounding developing germline cysts during pre-meiotic spermatogenesis. Only differentiating sperm appear to be unaccompanied by DSXM-positive somatic cells.


dsxmtranscripts in male embryos

A systematic survey of embryonic expression patterns has shown that dsx transcripts are not maternally deposited and are specifically expressed in the somatic precursors of the gonads just prior to gonad coalescence [25]. However, this global survey did not determine the sex of the embryos or specify the dsx mRNA isoform. We sorted male and female embryos bearing a female-specific Sxl early promoter [24] attached to eGFP and performed RT-PCR experiments using mRNA from sexed 3–10 hour, 10–16 hour and 16–22 hour old embryos (Fig. 1A–C) to determine if dsxmmRNA is expressed in embryos. dsxmmRNA was not readily detected in 3–10 hour old embryos of either sex, but was easily detected in 10–16 hour and 16–22 hour old male embryos. Sequencing of the RT-PCR products verified that they derived from predicted dsxmtranscripts. Thus, RT-PCR experiments showed that dsxmis expressed solely in male embryos.

Figure 1

dsxmand DSXM in embryos. (A) RT-PCR of dsxmfrom sex sorted embryos of ages 3–10 hours; 10–16 hours and 16–22 hours. (B) β3-tubulin amplification control. (C) Cartoon of dsx transcripts. The positions of the primers used for the amplification of the male-specific dsxmproducts are marked (arrows). (D, F, H) Anti-DSXM and (E, G, I) anti-VASA immunofluorescence in (D, E) female, (F, G) male, and (H, I) dsx- embryos (Df(3R)dsx15/In(3R)dsx23). Images in each row are from the same confocal section of an embryo. Because we used GFP to distinguish homozygous dsx- from balancer and heterozygous control embryos, embryos in H, I were not sex sorted. However, we never observed DSXM staining in dsx- embryos, 50% of which were male. Secondary antibody for anti-DSXM was biotin-coupled goat anti-rat with tyramide signal amplification, and secondary for anti-VASA was Cy5 goat anti-rabbit. Scale bar = 10 μm.

DSXMexpression in the male embryonic gonad

To further dissect the DSXM expression pattern, we raised polyclonal antisera against a peptide from the male-specific C-terminus of DSXM. To determine antibody specificity we performed immuno-labeling experiments focusing on whether: 1) the cell-staining pattern matched the in situ hybridization pattern, 2) the signal was male-specific and 3) the signal was absent from male embryos mutant for dsx.

The anti-VASA antibody was used to detect germ cells, which served as a guide to follow somatic cells of the gonad. In wild-type male embryos, cells intermingled with VASA-positive germ cells were clearly stained with anti-DSXM during embryonic stage 13 (Fig 1F). Based on position, these were the somatic gonad precursor cells. The DSXM staining was nuclear based on coincident DAPI staining for DNA (additional file 1). Additionally, the pattern of anti-DSXM immunofluorescence coincided with the dsxmtranscription pattern detected by in situ hybridization previously [25], and in this study (not shown). Finally, we did not observe anti-DSXM immunofluorescence in either female embryos (Fig 1D, E), or in embryos expressing a dsx mRNA truncated upstream of the region encoding the epitope used for antibody generation (genotype = Df(3R)dsx15/In(3R)dsx23) (Fig 1H, I).

To better determine the identity of DSXM-expressing cells, we performed co-immunofluorescence staining experiments with anti-DSXM and antibodies against several somatic gonad precursor markers. We focused on mid- to late embryogenesis when DSXM is strongly expressed and when gonad formation occurs (Fig 2).

Figure 2

Gonad development. Foregut and hindgut (dark-gray); anterior and posterior midgut (light-gray); somatic gonadal precursors (purple); germ cells (yellow); male-specific somatic gonadal precursors (orange); somatic gonadal precursors of the hub (red); and a previously undescribed group of cells (green) are indicated. (A) Stage 12 embryo. (B) Higher magnification view of the outlined area in A. (C) Stage 13 embryo. (D) Higher magnification view of the outlined area in C. (E) Stage 17 male embryo. (F) Higher magnification view of the outlined area in E. Cartoons of embryonic gonad development were adapted from Hartenstein [52]. During gonad formation (A, B) the germ cells and the associated somatic gonad precursors co-migrate towards abdominal segment 5, where they begin to coalesce to form the gonads [53, 54]. During and after gonad coalescence (C, D), the germ cells are intermingled with the somatic gonad cells [41]. Prior to gonad coalescence male-specific somatic gonadal precursor cells, specified in parasegment 13 in both males and females, are located posterior and ventral to non-sex-specific somatic gonad precursor cells. During stage 13 these cells move toward the gonad in both sexes, but only in males do these cells join the posterior of the coalescing gonad. In females these cell die, making the surviving ones "male-specific" [21]. The anterior somatic gonad also becomes sexually dimorphic early during gonad development (E, F). The hub, a cluster of somatic cells required for germline stem cell maintenance in the adult testis, forms anteriorly in the male embryonic gonad [29]. Later in stage 17, we saw another group of cells envelop the embryonic testis (E, F). The identity of these cells is uncertain, but they may be the precursors of the testis sheath [17].

We first ascertained the specific cell type/s that express DSXM by using anti-VASA to detect germ cells and an antibody against the transcription factor Traffic jam (TJ) to detect the somatic gonad precursors [26]. The double labeling with anti-VASA and anti-DSXM indicated that DSXM was not expressed in the germline. Anti-TJ and anti-DSXM staining indicated that DSXM was expressed in somatic cells intermingled with the germline in stage 13 embryos (Fig. 3A–H), stage 15 embryos (Fig. 3I–P), as well as in later embryonic stages.

Figure 3

DSXM and TJ expression in the male somatic gonad. (A-H) Stage 13 male embryo immunofluorescence using: (A) anti-DSXM, (B) anti-TJ, and (C) anti-VASA. (D) Merged images A-C. (E-H) Magnified view of the gonad in A-D. Somatic nuclei expressing DSXM but not TJ are indicated (arrows). (I-P) Stage 15 male embryo immunofluorescence using: (I) anti-DSXM, (J) anti-TJ, and (K) anti-VASA. (L) Merged images I-K. (M-P) Magnified view of the gonad in I-L. The scale bars = 50 μm in A-D; I-L and 10 μm in E-H; M-P. Anterior is to the left. Secondary antibodies were: (A, I) biotin-coupled goat anti-rat with TSA, (B, J) Alexa 488 goat anti-guinea pig, and (C, K) Cy5 goat anti-rabbit.

The overlap in TJ and DSXM staining was consistent with DSXM expression in all somatic gonad precursors in the embryonic testis. However, at the very posterior of the coalescing gonad we detected DSXM expression in cells that did not show TJ staining (Fig. 3E, H and 3M, P arrows), but were clearly assembled into the embryonic testis. TJ is reported to be expressed in all somatic gonad cell precursors [26], but our data suggest that TJ is not expressed in the posterior somatic precursors. Based on position and the confirming experiments outlined below, these DSXM-positive and TJ-negative cells were the male-specific somatic gonad cells. This indicates that TJ is not expressed in all somatic gonad cells.

To further investigate DSXM expression in the somatic gonad we used anti-Eyes absent (EYA). EYA is a transcription factor, which is also expressed in the somatic gonad [27]. EYA was found in the entire somatic gonad including the cluster of posterior TJ-negative somatic gonad cells. Staining for EYA and DSXM revealed co-expression at the cellular level throughout the entire somatic gonad of stage 13 and older embryos (Fig. 4A–D). These data suggest that a small population of somatic gonad cells expresses DSXM and EYA, but not TJ.

Figure 4

DSXM but not TJ is expressed in male-specific somatic gonadal precursors. (A-D) Stage 13 testis immunofluorescence using (A) anti-DSXM, (B) anti-EYA, and (C) anti-VASA. (D) Merged images A-C. A DSXM and EYA positive cluster of cell nuclei is located posterior and ventral to the other cells of the somatic gonad (arrows). (E-H) Stage 13 male testis immunofluorescence using (E) anti-DSXM, (F) anti-SOX100B and (G) anti-VASA. (H) Merged images E-G. (I-L) Stage 15 testis immunofluorescence using (I) anti-DSXM, (J) anti-SOX100B, and (K) anti-VASA antibody. (L) Merged images I-K. (M-P) Stage 15 testis immunofluorescence using (M) anti-TJ, (N) anti-SOX100B and (O) anti-VASA. (P) Merged images M-O. The scale bars = 10 μm. Anterior is to the left. Secondary antibodies were: (A, E, I) biotin-coupled goat anti-rat and TSA, (B) Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse, (C) Cy5 goat anti-rabbit), (F, J) Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit, (G, K, O) Alexa 647 goat anti-chicken, (M) Alexa 488 goat anti-guinea pig, (N) biotin-coupled goat anti-rabbit and TSA.

To ascertain the identity of the posterior most cells of the somatic gonad more directly, we applied anti-DSXM in combination with anti-SOX100B, because the male-specific somatic gonad precursor cells are reported to be the only gonad cells expressing SOX100B [28]. Anti-DSXM and anti-SOX100B co-immunofluorescence revealed DSXM expression in male-specific somatic gonad precursors (Fig. 4E–L). Absence of TJ in a subset of SOX100B-expressing cells was confirmed by counter-staining with anti-SOX100B (Fig. 4M–P). There were clearly cells expressing SOX100B, but not TJ. A few cells appeared to express both SOX100B and TJ. Taken together, these data indicate that DSXM is expressed in all somatic gonad cells expressing EYA and either TJ or SOX100B.

Interestingly, SOX100B was also expressed in another population of cells that wrapped around the gonad in stage 17 embryos (Fig. 5A–D). These might have been the precursors of the testis sheath [17], but we did not investigate the fate or function of these cells in this study. We did not observe DSXM expression in these SOX100B-positive cells surrounding the embryonic testis (Fig. 5A–D).

Figure 5

DSXM is not expressed in all somatic testis cells. (A-D) stage 17 testis immunofluorescence using (A) anti-DSXM, (B) anti-SOX100B, and (C) anti-VASA. (D) Merged images A-C. (E-H) stage 17 testis immunofluorescence (imaged in a focal plane with the hub) using (E) anti-DSXM, (F) anti-FAS III, and (G) anti-VASA. (H) Merged images E-G. The scale bars = 10 μm. Secondary antibodies were: (A, E) biotin-coupled goat anti-rat and TSA, (B) Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit, (C) Alexa 647 goat anti-chicken, (F) Alexa 647 goat anti-mouse, and (G) Cy5 goat anti-rabbit.

The testis hub is part of the niche and required to maintain male germline stem cell identity. The somatic hub cells of the male gonad can be identified in stage 17 embryonic testes as an anterior cluster of somatic cells expressing the cell adhesion molecule Fasciclin III (FAS III) [29]. In anti-DSXM and anti-FAS III co-immunofluorescence experiments, we observed strong DSXM expression in hub cells that were outlined by anti-FAS III labeling (Fig. 5E–H). Taken together, our data indicate that DSXM is expressed in all the somatic cells of the embryonic testis identified with somatic gonad markers, except the SOX100B-positive cells that surround the embryonic testis at stage 17.

DSXMis expressed during spermatogenesis in cyst cells prior to meiosis

In contrast to many other cell types, the germline stem cells continue to divide in adults in order to produce gametes. If germline sexual identity is irreversibly determined during embryogenesis, there may be no need for post-embryonic somatic DSXM expression. However, if sex determination or maintenance of sexual identity is an ongoing process, then germline sexual identity might require continued expression of DSX. We readily detected dsxmtranscripts by RT-PCR with RNA from adult testes (not shown). To explore the cellular expression pattern of DSXM in testes of larvae and adult flies, we performed whole-mount antibody immunofluorescence staining experiments.

Male germline stem cells in close contact with the hub undergo asymmetric divisions to regenerate the stem cell population and produce the cells that develop into sperm [30]. Cells remaining at the hub are the stem cells. We observed DSXM expression in the somatic hub cells of larval (Fig. 6A–D) and adult testes (Fig. 6E–H), where it also co-localized with TJ. These data suggest that male germline stem cells are always in contact with DSXM-expressing cells.

Figure 6

DSXM in hub cells. (A-D) Larval (3rd instar) testis immunofluorescence using (A) anti-DSXM, (B) anti-TJ, and (C) anti-FAS III. (D) Merged images A-C. (E-F) Adult testis immunofluorescence using (E) anti-DSXM, (F) anti-TJ, and (G) anti-FAS III. (H) Merged images E-G. The hub is outlined (white dashes). The scale bars = 10 μm. Anterior is up and out of the plane toward the viewer (the outlined hub is most anterior). Secondary antibodies were: (A, E) biotin-coupled goat anti-rat and TSA, (B, F) Alexa 488 goat anti-guinea pig, and (C, G) Alexa 647 goat anti-mouse.

Germline cells leaving the niche divide four times to produce 16-cell cysts. Germline cysts are enveloped by two somatic cyst cells, which become flattened as the germline cysts enlarge 20-fold in volume in preparation for meiosis. These engorged cells are highly transcriptionally active. Sperm differentiation occurs postmeiotically under translational control [30]. The transcription factor TJ is expressed in the cyst progenitor cells at the apex and in early cyst cells enveloping the dividing germ cells and then fades in later cysts [26]. EYA expression becomes stronger during this progression, such that the two patterns are partially complementary [31]. Co-immunofluorescence with anti-DSXM, anti-TJ and anti-EYA revealed that there was overlapping expression of the three proteins in these somatic cyst cells (Fig. 7). Anti-DSXM staining of larval and adult testes revealed expression in early cyst cells as evidenced by position within the gonad and the overlap with TJ. When TJ expression faded, DSXM expression persisted in late cyst cells and co-localized with EYA (Fig. 7A–D and 7E–H). Interestingly, anti-DSXM staining was never observed in cyst cells surrounding transcriptionally quiescent post-meiotic stages (not shown). These data are consistent with the idea that the determination or maintenance of germ cell sexual identity requires ongoing DSXM expression until the end of spermatogenic transcription at meiosis, but is no required once germline transcription ceases.

Figure 7

DSXM expression during spermatogenesis. (A-D) Larval testis immunofluorescence using (A) anti-DSXM, (B) anti-TJ, and (C) anti-EYA. (D) Merged images A-C. (E-H) Higher magnification view of A-D. (I-L) Adult apical testis immunofluorescence using (I) anti-DSXM, (J) anti-TJ and (K) anti-EYA. (L) Merged images I-K. (M-P) Higher magnification view of I-L. The scale bar = 50 μm in A-D, 20 μm in E-L, and 5 μm in M-P. Anterior is up. Secondary antibodies were: (A, I) biotin-coupled goat anti-rat and TSA, (B, J) Alexa 488 goat anti-guinea pig, (C, K) Alexa 647 goat anti-mouse.

DSXMexpression does not require a germline, EYA, or TJ

Testis formation depends on the collaboration of germ cells and distinct somatic cell types. However, somatic gonad formation is independent of germ cells [17, 32]. Therefore, we predicted that functional DSXM expression should not be dependent on a germline. To investigate whether germ cells were necessary for DSXM expression in somatic gonadal precursor cells, we examined embryos lacking germ cells due to the maternal grandchildless mutation gs(l)N26 [33]. Unsurprisingly, anti-DSXM staining was readily detectable in germlineless embryonic testes (Fig. 8A–D) indicating that the germline is not required to induce or maintain DSXM expression.

Figure 8

DSXM expression does not require germ cells nor EYA or TJ. (A-D) Agametic testis of stage 15 males from gs(1)N26 mothers. Immunofluorescence using (A) anti-DSXM, (B) anti-TJ, and (C) anti-VASA. (D) Merged images A-C. (E-H) Isolated somatic gonadal precursors and germ cells formed in homozygous eya mutants. Immunofluorescence using (E) anti-DSXM, (F) anti-TJ, and (G) anti-VASA. (H) Merged images E-G. (I-L) Expression in tjeomutant testis revealed with immunofluorescence using (I) anti-DSXM, (J) anti-TJ, and (K) anti-VASA. (L) Merged images I-K. Expression of the non-functional truncated TJ protein in tjeomutant embryos is diffuse within the somatic gonadal precursors (J). The scale bars = 10 μm. Anterior is to the left. Secondary antibodies were: (A, E, I) biotin-coupled goat anti-rat and TSA, (B) Alexa 647 goat anti-guinea pig, (C) Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit, (F, J) Alexa 488 goat anti-guinea pig, and (G, K) Cy5 goat anti-rabbit.

The eya gene was a candidate regulator of dsx expression as EYA was always expressed in DSXM-positive gonad cells, and preceded DSXM expression temporally in the embryo (EYA was strongly expressed in somatic gonadal precursor cells of stage 12 embryos, when we did not readily detect DSXM expression). We therefore determined whether DSXM expression required EYA function. This experiment was complicated by the fact that EYA is essential for gonadogenesis. In late embryonic stages, eya mutant embryos have germ cells that are scattered throughout posterior regions and only a few somatic gonad precursor cells develop. The few somatic gonad precursors do not coalesce into a gonad, rather they form clumps with associated germ cells [27]. In homozygous eya mutant male embryos, we were able to detect DSXM expression in the sporadically formed somatic gonad precursor cells (Fig. 8E–H). These sporadically formed cells also expressed TJ. Expression of DSXM and TJ in these rarely formed somatic gonad precursor cells suggests that eya is not obligatory for expression of TJ or DSXM in the embryonic testis. However, it should be noted that there are very few TJ- and DSXM-positive cells in eya mutants. Those somatic gonad cells that escape may not be representative.

TJ was expressed in many DSXM-positive somatic cells and was therefore a potential regulator of dsx. We examined tjeo2 male embryos to determine if DSXM expression depends upon TJ. The tjeo2 allele [26] encodes a truncated protein lacking the two DNA-binding domains, a putative bipartite nuclear localization signal, and the leucine-zipper domain. The allele behaves as a genetic null. In gonads of tj mutant embryos, germline divisions during late embryogenesis are hindered. Additionally, somatic gonad cells do not intermingle with germ cells and remain at the gonad periphery [26]. In homozygous tj mutant male embryos, we detected DSXM expression in all the somatic gonad cells (Fig. 8I–L). Thus, DSXM expression in somatic gonad cells is not dependent upon the activity of TJ.


Spatial and sexual regulation of DSXM

The pre-mRNA splicing cascade regulating somatic sexual development has been well studied (Fig 9A). The X-chromosome number is read by the uniform expression of X chromosome transcription factors, which uniformly and transiently activate Sxl expression in XX:AA flies prior to general activation of the zygotic genome [3]. This transient expression of the SXL splicing factor results in an autoregulatory loop when Sxl pre-mRNA is produced from a ubiquitous promoter active later in development. In X:AA flies, SXL is not present and dosage compensation complexes form in all X:AA cells to increase X chromosome gene expression [34]. Addressing chromosome dose imbalance should be important for all cells. The uniform and early expression of SXL to prevent over-expression of X chromosome genes, via inhibition of male-specific-lethal-2 (MSL2) in females, is therefore quite logical. The absence of SXL also ultimately results in DSXM production. As many aspects of sexual dimorphism in the soma require DSX function [8, 14, 3538], there is no a priori requirement for tissue-specific expression of dsx.

Figure 9

DSXM regulation. DSXM is regulated by the intersection of the sex-determination alternative pre-mRNA splicing hierarchy and spatial/temporal regulation (A). Positive (green arrows) and negative interactions (red) are indicated. See text for details. Cellular markers are differentially expressed in somatic cell types of the male gonad during embryonic and adult stages (B). Cell cartoons and expression indicators are color-coded. Germ cells (yellow), somatic gonad precursors and cyst-cells (purple), male-specific somatic gonadal precursors (orange), hub cells (red), and a novel layer of embryonic testis cells (green) are shown.

Here we show that DSXM expression in male embryos is restricted to somatic gonadal cells that form several hours after SXL expression is initiated. Consequently, in addition to the sex determination hierarchy, it is likely that DSXM expression depends on additional and yet unknown activators expressed in embryonic somatic gonadal precursor cells or repressors in non-gonadal somatic cells. It is also likely that DSXF is expressed in the corresponding somatic gonad in females, but we have not been able to generate useful antibodies against the predicted female isoform, or the region common to DSXM and DSXF. Expression of dsx in subsets of the nervous system [39] raises the possibility that transcriptional deployment of dsx pre-mRNAs in female or male pre-mRNA splicing environments is a common theme.

Defining subsets of somatic testis cells

Two main cell types compose the embryonic Drosophila gonad: germ cells and somatic gonad cells [19]. Our results suggest that each somatic gonadal cell of a male stage 13 embryo has a male identity before overt morphological testis development is evident. By stage 17, embryonic gonads are clearly sexually dimorphic (Fig 9B). The hub, a cluster of specialized somatic cells required for germline stem cell maintenance, forms anteriorly in stage 17 testes [29]; these hub cells express DSXM. We have also seen a monolayer of cells around the testis during stage 17, possibly the testis sheath precursors. These late additions to the embryonic testis do not express DSXM but do express SOX100B.

Somatic DSXMand the germline

Although DSXM is required to promote male development and to repress female development in several somatic tissues, the role of DSXM activity in embryonic testis morphogenesis is unclear as dsx mutants are strikingly similar to wildtype males [21]. However, it is clear that DSXM regulates the expression of the STAT92E transcription factor in male embryonic germ cells [22]. Additionally, DSXM results in male-specific splicing of Sxl pre-mRNA in adult germ cells [15]. Perhaps the major role of somatic DSXM in the embryo is regulation of the germline gene expression program. The non-autonomous role of DSXM is not restricted to germline development, as DSXM also non-autonomously regulates the post-embryonic recruitment of mesodermal cells to the male genital disc [40].

DSXM-expressing cells are in intimate contact with the germline, which may be important to enable the somatic sex determination pathway to influence germ cell development in the embryonic gonad. Somatic gonadal precursors undergo striking shape changes as the gonad coalesces, producing thin cellular extensions that surround the round germ cells at stage 13 [41]. DSXM expression becomes apparent at this stage.

There is also contact between germline and DSXM-positive somatic cells in post-embryonic stages. We found that DSXM is expressed in testes of larvae and adult flies in the somatic cyst cells enveloping all premeiotic germ cell cysts as well as in the hub. DSXM expression was never observed in cyst cells enclosing postmeiotic germ cells, which have completed the transcriptional program required for sperm differentiation [42, 43]. Thus, DSXM appears to be expressed in all the somatic cells that are closely associated with the germ cells from gonad formation until the transcriptional program of spermatogenesis is complete.



All flies were raised and maintained on standard cornmeal media (Tucson Drosophila stock center, Tucson, AZ) at 25°C. A fly strain bearing a construct containing the early Sex lethal promoter, SxlP E , [24] upstream of the coding sequence for eGFP on chromosome 3 (Sxl-GFP-3) was used for sexing embryos [44]. Only female embryos of this line express eGFP. Dechorionated embryos were sex sorted by distinguishing fluorescent versus non-fluorescent embryos using the Copas Select sorter (UNION Biometrica, Holliston, MA). 60 embryos from each collection were set aside and allowed to mature to score the sexing efficiency. Only collections showing 100% sexing fidelity were used in experiments. The following mutant alleles were used for analyses: gs(l)N26 [45]; Df(3R)dsx15 and In(3R)dsx23 [46]; eyacli-IIEand eyacli-DI[47] and tjeo2 [26].


Total RNA was prepared using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) from 3–10, 10–16, 16–22 hour old, sex sorted embryos as well as from testes of male adult flies. Preparation of polyA+-mRNA from all samples was done using the Oligotex mRNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RT-PCR was performed using the OneStep RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). A pair of primers (RT-sense 5'-CGCGCACCACGTCCACATGGCAGCTG-3'; male-antisense 5'-CTCTGGAGTCGGTGGACAAATCTGTGTG-3') flanking two introns was used to amplify an 801 bp cDNA fragment from the dsxmtranscript. The amplicons were sequenced for verification. For loading control a separate RT-PCR of each mRNA sample was carried out in parallel using a primer pair (β3 sense 5'-ATCATTTCCGAGGAGCACGGC-3'; β3 antisense 5'-GCCCAGCGAGTGCGTCAATTG-3') for the ubiquitously expressed gene β3-tubulin [48], which amplifies a 397 bp fragment from the transcript.

Antibodies and immunofluorescence staining

The polyclonal DSXM antibody was made using standard methods (Covance, Princeton, NJ). A peptide containing the C-terminal amino acids SSNGAYHHGHHL was used for immunization of two rats, both of which gave useful antibodies of good titer and were used here.

For cell staining experiments, pre-stage 17 embryos were fixed, devitellinized, and immunostained as described [49]. Because the presence of the cuticle greatly hinders antibody staining, we used a different protocol for stage 17. Fixed stage 17 embryos were rehydrated, washed twice in 1 × PBS + 0.1% Tween 20 (PBT), sonicated in 500 μl PBT (2 pulses of 3 sec. using a Misonix Sonicator 3000 at output setting 1), rewashed twice in PBT and immunostained [49]. Gonads of larvae and adult flies were dissected, fixed and immunostained as described [50]. All stained samples were mounted on slides in Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL).

Antibodies were as follows: mouse anti-FASIII and mouse anti-EYA10H6 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) at 1:50, rabbit anti-SOX100B [28] at 1:1000, guinea pig anti-TJ [26] at 1:3000, rabbit anti-VASA (R. Lehmann) at 1:5000, chicken anti-VASA [51] at 1:1000. For the rat anti-DSXM at 1:500 in general and the rabbit anti-SOX100B at 1:1000 (in Fig 4N) the TSA (Tyramide Signal Amplification) Cyanine 3 technology (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) in combination with the ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingham, CA) was used as the detection system.

The following secondary antibodies were used, all at 1:500: Cy5 goat anti-rabbit, biotin-coupled goat anti-rat, and biotin-coupled goat anti-rabbit (Jackson Immuo-research, West Grove, PA), Alexa 647 goat anti-guinea pig, Alexa 488 goat anti-guinea pig, Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit, Alexa 647 goat anti-mouse, Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse, Alexa 647 goat anti-chicken (Invitrogen Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA). Images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta Confocal Microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) and processed using Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe, San Jose, CA). All figures were annotated using Illustrator 10.0 (Adobe, San Jose, CA). All images in figures are single optical sections as indicated.

DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride) staining was used to visualize the nuclei.


  1. 1.

    Marin I, Baker BS: The evolutionary dynamics of sex determination. Science. 1998, 281 (5385): 1990-1994. 10.1126/science.281.5385.1990.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Burtis KC: The regulation of sex determination and sexually dimorphic differentiation in Drosophila. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1993, 5 (6): 1006-1014. 10.1016/0955-0674(93)90085-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cline TW, Meyer BJ: Vive la difference: males vs females in flies vs worms. Annu Rev Genet. 1996, 30: 637-702. 10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.637.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zarkower D: Invertebrates may not be so different after all. Novartis Found Symp. 2002, 244: 115-135.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Burtis KC, Baker BS: Drosophila doublesex gene controls somatic sexual differentiation by producing alternatively spliced mRNAs encoding related sex-specific polypeptides. Cell. 1989, 56 (6): 997-1010. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90633-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Burtis KC, Coschigano KT, Baker BS, Wensink PC: The doublesex proteins of Drosophila melanogaster bind directly to a sex-specific yolk protein gene enhancer. Embo J. 1991, 10 (9): 2577-2582.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Erdman SE, Burtis KC: The Drosophila doublesex proteins share a novel zinc finger related DNA binding domain. Embo J. 1993, 12 (2): 527-535.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Baker BS, Ridge KA: Sex and the single cell. I. On the action of major loci affecting sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1980, 94 (2): 383-423.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Baker BS, Wolfner MF: A molecular analysis of doublesex, a bifunctional gene that controls both male and female sexual differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1988, 2 (4): 477-489. 10.1101/gad.2.4.477.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Nagoshi RN, Baker BS: Regulation of sex-specific RNA splicing at the Drosophila doublesex gene: cis-acting mutations in exon sequences alter sex-specific RNA splicing patterns. Genes Dev. 1990, 4 (1): 89-97. 10.1101/gad.4.1.89.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Nöthiger R, Jonglez M, Leuthold M, Meier-Gerschwiler P, Weber T: Sex determination in the germ line of Drosophila depends on genetic signals and inductive somatic factors. Development. 1989, 107 (3): 505-518.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Baker BS, Burtis K, Goralski T, Mattox W, Nagoshi R: Molecular genetic aspects of sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome. 1989, 31 (2): 638-645.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Billeter JC, Rideout EJ, Dornan AJ, Goodwin SF: Control of male sexual behavior in Drosophila by the sex determination pathway. Curr Biol. 2006, 16 (17): R766-776. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.025.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hildreth PE: Doublesex, Recessive Gene That Transforms Both Males and Females of Drosophila into Intersexes. Genetics. 1965, 51: 659-678.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Oliver B, Kim YJ, Baker BS: Sex-lethal, master and slave: a hierarchy of germ-line sex determination in Drosophila. Development. 1993, 119 (3): 897-908.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Schüpbach T: Autosomal mutations that interfere with sex determination in somatic cells of Drosophila have no direct effect on the germline. Dev Biol. 1982, 89 (1): 117-127. 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90300-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sonnenblick BP: Germ Cell Movements and Sex Differentiation of the Gonads in the Drosophila Embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1941, 27 (10): 484-489. 10.1073/pnas.27.10.484.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Moore LA, Broihier HT, Van Doren M, Lehmann R: Gonadal mesoderm and fat body initially follow a common developmental path in Drosophila. Development. 1998, 125 (5): 837-844.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rongo C, Broihier HT, Moore L, Van Doren M, Forbes A, Lehmann R: Germ plasm assembly and germ cell migration in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1997, 62: 1-11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Van Doren M, Mathews WR, Samuels M, Moore LA, Broihier HT, Lehmann R: Fear of intimacy encodes a novel transmembrane protein required for gonad morphogenesis in Drosophila. Development. 2003, 130 (11): 2355-2364. 10.1242/dev.00454.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    DeFalco TJ, Verney G, Jenkins AB, McCaffery JM, Russell S, Van Doren M: Sex-specific apoptosis regulates sexual dimorphism in the Drosophila embryonic gonad. Dev Cell. 2003, 5 (2): 205-216. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00204-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wawersik M, Milutinovich A, Casper AL, Matunis E, Williams B, Van Doren M: Somatic control of germline sexual development is mediated by the JAK/STAT pathway. Nature. 2005, 436 (7050): 563-567. 10.1038/nature03849.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bopp D, Bell LR, Cline TW, Schedl P: Developmental distribution of female-specific Sex-lethal proteins in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1991, 5 (3): 403-415. 10.1101/gad.5.3.403.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Keyes LN, Cline TW, Schedl P: The primary sex determination signal of Drosophila acts at the level of transcription. Cell. 1992, 68 (5): 933-943. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90036-C.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tomancak P, Beaton A, Weiszmann R, Kwan E, Shu S, Lewis SE, Richards S, Ashburner M, Hartenstein V, Celniker SE, et al: Systematic determination of patterns of gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genome Biol. 2002, 3 (12): RESEARCH0088-10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0088.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Li MA, Alls JD, Avancini RM, Koo K, Godt D: The large Maf factor Traffic Jam controls gonad morphogenesis in Drosophila. Nat Cell Biol. 2003, 5 (11): 994-1000. 10.1038/ncb1058.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Boyle M, Bonini N, DiNardo S: Expression and function of clift in the development of somatic gonadal precursors within the Drosophila mesoderm. Development. 1997, 124 (5): 971-982.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hui Yong Loh S, Russell S: A Drosophila group E Sox gene is dynamically expressed in the embryonic alimentary canal. Mech Dev. 2000, 93 (1–2): 185-188. 10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00258-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Le Bras S, Van Doren M: Development of the male germline stem cell niche in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 2006, 294 (1): 92-103. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.02.030.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Fuller MT: spermatogenesis. The development of Drosophila melanogaster. Edited by: Bate M, Martinez-Arias A. 2006, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, I: 71-147.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Fabrizio JJ, Boyle M, DiNardo S: A somatic role for eyes absent (eya) and sine oculis (so) in Drosophila spermatocyte development. Dev Biol. 2003, 258 (1): 117-128. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00127-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Aboim AN: Developpement embryonnaire et post-embryonnaire des gonades normales et agametiques de Drosophila melanogaster. Rev Suisse Zool. 1945, 52: 53-154.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Iida T, Kobayashi S: Delocalization of polar plasm components caused by grandchildless mutations, gs(1)N26 and gs(1)N441, in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Growth Differ. 2000, 42 (1): 53-60. 10.1046/j.1440-169x.2000.00482.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lucchesi JC, Kelly WG, Panning B: Chromatin remodeling in dosage compensation. Annu Rev Genet. 2005, 39: 615-651. 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.094210.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Keisman EL, Christiansen AE, Baker BS: The sex determination gene doublesex regulates the A/P organizer to direct sex-specific patterns of growth in the Drosophila genital imaginal disc. Dev Cell. 2001, 1 (2): 215-225. 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00027-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kopp A, Duncan I, Godt D, Carroll SB: Genetic control and evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in Drosophila. Nature. 2000, 408 (6812): 553-559. 10.1038/35046017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sanchez L, Gorfinkiel N, Guerrero I: Sex determination genes control the development of the Drosophila genital disc, modulating the response to Hedgehog, Wingless and Decapentaplegic signals. Development. 2001, 128 (7): 1033-1043.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Waterbury JA, Jackson LL, Schedl P: Analysis of the doublesex female protein in Drosophila melanogaster: role on sexual differentiation and behavior and dependence on intersex. Genetics. 1999, 152 (4): 1653-1667.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lee G, Hall JC, Park JH: Doublesex gene expression in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurogenet. 2002, 16 (4): 229-248. 10.1080/01677060216292.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ahmad SM, Baker BS: Sex-specific deployment of FGF signaling in Drosophila recruits mesodermal cells into the male genital imaginal disc. Cell. 2002, 109 (5): 651-661. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00744-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jenkins AB, McCaffery JM, Van Doren M: Drosophila E-cadherin is essential for proper germ cell-soma interaction during gonad morphogenesis. Development. 2003, 130 (18): 4417-4426. 10.1242/dev.00639.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Schäfer M, Nayernia K, Engel W, Schäfer U: Translational control in spermatogenesis. Dev Biol. 1995, 172 (2): 344-352. 10.1006/dbio.1995.8049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Renkawitz-Pohl R, Hempel L, Hollmann M, Schäfer MA: Spermatogenesis. Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry, pharmacology and molecular biology. Edited by: Gilbert LI, Iatrou K, Gill S. 2005, Oxford: Elsevier LTd, 1: 157-178.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Thomson JGP, Schedl P, Pulak R: Sex-specifc GFP-expression in Drosophila embryos and sorting by Copas flow cytometry technique. presented at the 45th Annual Drosophila Research Conference, Washington DC (USA). 2004, March 24–28, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Niki Y: Developmental analysis of the grandchildless (gs(1)N26) mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: abnormal cleavage patterns and defects in pole cell formation. Dev Biol. 1984, 103 (1): 182-189. 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90019-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Baker BS, Hoff G, Kaufman TC, Wolfner MF, Hazelrigg T: The doublesex locus of Drosophila melanogaster and its flanking regions: a cytogenetic analysis. Genetics. 1991, 127 (1): 125-138.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Nüsslein-Volhard CWE, Kluding H: Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. Zygotic loci on the second hromosome. Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 1984, 193: 267-282. 10.1007/BF00848156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bialojan S, Falkenburg D, Renkawitz-Pohl R: Characterization and developmental expression of beta tubulin genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Embo J. 1984, 3 (11): 2543-2548.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Patel NH: Imaging neuronal subsets and other cell types in whole-mount Drosophila embryos and larvae using antibody probes. Methods Cell Biol. 1994, 44: 445-487.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lin TY, Viswanathan S, Wood C, Wilson PG, Wolf N, Fuller MT: Coordinate developmental control of the meiotic cell cycle and spermatid differentiation in Drosophila males. Development. 1996, 122 (4): 1331-1341.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Burnett C, Howard K: Fly and mammalian lipid phosphate phosphatase isoforms differ in activity both in vitro and in vivo. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4 (8): 793-799. 10.1038/sj.embor.embor900.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hartenstein V: Atlas of Drosophila Development. 1993, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Boyle M, DiNardo S: Specification, migration and assembly of the somatic cells of the Drosophila gonad. Development. 1995, 121 (6): 1815-1825.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Brookman JJ, Toosy AT, Shashidhara LS, White RA: The 412 retrotransposon and the development of gonadal mesoderm in Drosophila. Development. 1992, 116 (4): 1185-1192.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank S. DiNardo, M. van Doren, D. Godt, P. Graham, K. Howard, S. Kobayashi, R. Lehmann, S. Russell, P. Schedl, the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank and the Bloomington Stock Center for flies and reagents. We are grateful to members of the Oliver and van Doren labs as well as members of the LCDB for discussion. We also thank the anonymous referees for valuable suggestion on the manuscript. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIDDK.

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Leonie U Hempel or Brian Oliver.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hempel, L.U., Oliver, B. Sex-specific DoublesexM expression in subsets of Drosophilasomatic gonad cells. BMC Dev Biol 7, 113 (2007).

Download citation


  • Germ Cell
  • Cyst Cell
  • Male Embryo
  • Dosage Compensation Complex
  • Somatic Gonad