Sex-specific DoublesexM expression in subsets of Drosophilasomatic gonad cells
© Hempel and Oliver.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 10 April 2007
Accepted: 12 October 2007
Published: 12 October 2007
In Drosophila melanogaster, a pre-mRNA splicing hierarchy controls sexual identity and ultimately leads to sex-specific Doublesex (DSX) transcription factor isoforms. The male-specific DSXM represses genes involved in female development and activates genes involved in male development. Spatial and temporal control of dsx during embryogenesis is not well documented.
Here we show that DSXM is specifically expressed in subsets of male somatic gonad cells during embryogenesis. Following testis formation, germ cells remain in contact with DSXM-expressing cells, including hub cells and premeiotic somatic cyst cells that surround germ cells during spermatogenesis in larval and adult testes.
We show that dsx is transcriptionally regulated in addition to being regulated at the pre-mRNA splicing level by the sex determination hierarchy. The dsx locus is spatially controlled by somatic gonad identity. The continuous expression of DSXM in cells contacting the germline suggests an ongoing short-range influence of the somatic sex determination pathway on germ cell development.
A regulatory cascade directs all aspects of somatic sexual differentiation in Drosophila, including somatic gonad formation [1–3]. This hierarchy is composed of a series of alternative pre-mRNA processing regulators. Diploid flies with two X chromosomes are female (XX:AA) and those with one are male (X:AA). The Sex-lethal (SXL) protein is ubiquitously expressed in early XX:AA embryos and directs female splicing of later appearing Sxl and transformer (tra) pre-mRNA such that functional SXL and TRA proteins are produced only in females. Presence of TRA and the constitutive product of transformer-2 (tra2) in females lead to female-specific splicing of the doublesex (dsx) pre-mRNA, which then gives rise to DSXF protein. In X:AA flies, the absence of SXL, and thus TRA, results in male-specific splicing of dsx pre-mRNA. Male-specific dsx mRNA encodes DSXM protein. Both DSXF and DSXM are zinc-finger transcription factors of the DMRT family. Members of this family play important roles in sex determination in most animals that have been examined to date .
The Drosophila DSX proteins possess identical N-terminal DNA-binding domains but differ in their C-termini [5–7]. DSXM is thought to repress genes that are involved in female development and activate male differentiation genes while DSXF is thought to do the opposite [8–11]. Although there are a few aspects of sexual dimorphism that are not controlled by DSX, a plethora of phenotypes including elaboration of the abdominal pigmentation, development of the genitalia, sex combs and abdominal neuroblasts, as well as certain aspects of male courtship behavior depend on this important regulator of sexual dimorphism [8, 12, 13].
The dsx locus plays a critical role in both somatic gonad development  and specification of germline sexual identity [11, 15]. Flies transformed from females to males by constitutive expression of DSXM have testes but very few germ cells. These germ cells can show evidence of either male or female development. However, dsx is not required within the germline cells, suggesting that the role of dsx in germline development is non-autonomous . Thus, DSX expression is expected in somatic cells that communicate with the germline. Developmental northern blots have shown that there are multiple dsx transcripts in larvae and adults . Despite the importance of dsx in both somatic gonad and germline development, very little is known about when and where DSX is expressed during gonadogenesis.
Gonad development in Drosophila is initiated in the embryo . Germ cells form at the posterior pole of the embryo, divide, are carried into the embryo during gastrulation, migrate through the future gut, and coalesce. Recent work has shown that mesodermal cells from the abdominal region, as well as the germline cells, undergo a well-defined set of migrations to the presumptive gonad and then coalesce into the gonad [18–20]. Additional somatic cells, which express SOX100B, are recruited and maintained in the embryonic testis but not in the ovary; these cells are called male-specific somatic gonadal precursors . Following gonad formation, male germline divisions, regulated by the JAK/STAT pathway, begin , whereas there are no divisions of female germ cells at this stage.
In this report we show that the male-specific isoform of dsx mRNA is expressed in the embryo. We have developed an antibody that detected the DSXM isoform and show that, in contrast to SXL, which is expressed uniformly throughout the embryo [23, 24], DSXM expression was restricted to the initial somatic cells that form the somatic gonad in male embryos. Furthermore, DSXM is expressed in the male-specific somatic gonadal precursors that are later recruited to the gonad and are maintained in male embryos. DSXM is not detected outside the gonad, in the germ cells, or in the late arriving somatic cells that surround the embryonic testis. Male germ cells are in direct contact with DSXM-expressing somatic cells through adulthood, as DSXM is specifically expressed in the two somatic cyst cells surrounding developing germline cysts during pre-meiotic spermatogenesis. Only differentiating sperm appear to be unaccompanied by DSXM-positive somatic cells.
dsx m transcripts in male embryos
DSXMexpression in the male embryonic gonad
To further dissect the DSXM expression pattern, we raised polyclonal antisera against a peptide from the male-specific C-terminus of DSXM. To determine antibody specificity we performed immuno-labeling experiments focusing on whether: 1) the cell-staining pattern matched the in situ hybridization pattern, 2) the signal was male-specific and 3) the signal was absent from male embryos mutant for dsx.
The anti-VASA antibody was used to detect germ cells, which served as a guide to follow somatic cells of the gonad. In wild-type male embryos, cells intermingled with VASA-positive germ cells were clearly stained with anti-DSXM during embryonic stage 13 (Fig 1F). Based on position, these were the somatic gonad precursor cells. The DSXM staining was nuclear based on coincident DAPI staining for DNA (additional file 1). Additionally, the pattern of anti-DSXM immunofluorescence coincided with the dsx m transcription pattern detected by in situ hybridization previously , and in this study (not shown). Finally, we did not observe anti-DSXM immunofluorescence in either female embryos (Fig 1D, E), or in embryos expressing a dsx mRNA truncated upstream of the region encoding the epitope used for antibody generation (genotype = Df(3R)dsx15/In(3R)dsx23) (Fig 1H, I).
The overlap in TJ and DSXM staining was consistent with DSXM expression in all somatic gonad precursors in the embryonic testis. However, at the very posterior of the coalescing gonad we detected DSXM expression in cells that did not show TJ staining (Fig. 3E, H and 3M, P arrows), but were clearly assembled into the embryonic testis. TJ is reported to be expressed in all somatic gonad cell precursors , but our data suggest that TJ is not expressed in the posterior somatic precursors. Based on position and the confirming experiments outlined below, these DSXM-positive and TJ-negative cells were the male-specific somatic gonad cells. This indicates that TJ is not expressed in all somatic gonad cells.
To ascertain the identity of the posterior most cells of the somatic gonad more directly, we applied anti-DSXM in combination with anti-SOX100B, because the male-specific somatic gonad precursor cells are reported to be the only gonad cells expressing SOX100B . Anti-DSXM and anti-SOX100B co-immunofluorescence revealed DSXM expression in male-specific somatic gonad precursors (Fig. 4E–L). Absence of TJ in a subset of SOX100B-expressing cells was confirmed by counter-staining with anti-SOX100B (Fig. 4M–P). There were clearly cells expressing SOX100B, but not TJ. A few cells appeared to express both SOX100B and TJ. Taken together, these data indicate that DSXM is expressed in all somatic gonad cells expressing EYA and either TJ or SOX100B.
The testis hub is part of the niche and required to maintain male germline stem cell identity. The somatic hub cells of the male gonad can be identified in stage 17 embryonic testes as an anterior cluster of somatic cells expressing the cell adhesion molecule Fasciclin III (FAS III) . In anti-DSXM and anti-FAS III co-immunofluorescence experiments, we observed strong DSXM expression in hub cells that were outlined by anti-FAS III labeling (Fig. 5E–H). Taken together, our data indicate that DSXM is expressed in all the somatic cells of the embryonic testis identified with somatic gonad markers, except the SOX100B-positive cells that surround the embryonic testis at stage 17.
DSXMis expressed during spermatogenesis in cyst cells prior to meiosis
In contrast to many other cell types, the germline stem cells continue to divide in adults in order to produce gametes. If germline sexual identity is irreversibly determined during embryogenesis, there may be no need for post-embryonic somatic DSXM expression. However, if sex determination or maintenance of sexual identity is an ongoing process, then germline sexual identity might require continued expression of DSX. We readily detected dsx m transcripts by RT-PCR with RNA from adult testes (not shown). To explore the cellular expression pattern of DSXM in testes of larvae and adult flies, we performed whole-mount antibody immunofluorescence staining experiments.
DSXMexpression does not require a germline, EYA, or TJ
The eya gene was a candidate regulator of dsx expression as EYA was always expressed in DSXM-positive gonad cells, and preceded DSXM expression temporally in the embryo (EYA was strongly expressed in somatic gonadal precursor cells of stage 12 embryos, when we did not readily detect DSXM expression). We therefore determined whether DSXM expression required EYA function. This experiment was complicated by the fact that EYA is essential for gonadogenesis. In late embryonic stages, eya mutant embryos have germ cells that are scattered throughout posterior regions and only a few somatic gonad precursor cells develop. The few somatic gonad precursors do not coalesce into a gonad, rather they form clumps with associated germ cells . In homozygous eya mutant male embryos, we were able to detect DSXM expression in the sporadically formed somatic gonad precursor cells (Fig. 8E–H). These sporadically formed cells also expressed TJ. Expression of DSXM and TJ in these rarely formed somatic gonad precursor cells suggests that eya is not obligatory for expression of TJ or DSXM in the embryonic testis. However, it should be noted that there are very few TJ- and DSXM-positive cells in eya mutants. Those somatic gonad cells that escape may not be representative.
TJ was expressed in many DSXM-positive somatic cells and was therefore a potential regulator of dsx. We examined tjeo2 male embryos to determine if DSXM expression depends upon TJ. The tjeo2 allele  encodes a truncated protein lacking the two DNA-binding domains, a putative bipartite nuclear localization signal, and the leucine-zipper domain. The allele behaves as a genetic null. In gonads of tj mutant embryos, germline divisions during late embryogenesis are hindered. Additionally, somatic gonad cells do not intermingle with germ cells and remain at the gonad periphery . In homozygous tj mutant male embryos, we detected DSXM expression in all the somatic gonad cells (Fig. 8I–L). Thus, DSXM expression in somatic gonad cells is not dependent upon the activity of TJ.
Spatial and sexual regulation of DSXM
Here we show that DSXM expression in male embryos is restricted to somatic gonadal cells that form several hours after SXL expression is initiated. Consequently, in addition to the sex determination hierarchy, it is likely that DSXM expression depends on additional and yet unknown activators expressed in embryonic somatic gonadal precursor cells or repressors in non-gonadal somatic cells. It is also likely that DSXF is expressed in the corresponding somatic gonad in females, but we have not been able to generate useful antibodies against the predicted female isoform, or the region common to DSXM and DSXF. Expression of dsx in subsets of the nervous system  raises the possibility that transcriptional deployment of dsx pre-mRNAs in female or male pre-mRNA splicing environments is a common theme.
Defining subsets of somatic testis cells
Two main cell types compose the embryonic Drosophila gonad: germ cells and somatic gonad cells . Our results suggest that each somatic gonadal cell of a male stage 13 embryo has a male identity before overt morphological testis development is evident. By stage 17, embryonic gonads are clearly sexually dimorphic (Fig 9B). The hub, a cluster of specialized somatic cells required for germline stem cell maintenance, forms anteriorly in stage 17 testes ; these hub cells express DSXM. We have also seen a monolayer of cells around the testis during stage 17, possibly the testis sheath precursors. These late additions to the embryonic testis do not express DSXM but do express SOX100B.
Somatic DSXMand the germline
Although DSXM is required to promote male development and to repress female development in several somatic tissues, the role of DSXM activity in embryonic testis morphogenesis is unclear as dsx mutants are strikingly similar to wildtype males . However, it is clear that DSXM regulates the expression of the STAT92E transcription factor in male embryonic germ cells . Additionally, DSXM results in male-specific splicing of Sxl pre-mRNA in adult germ cells . Perhaps the major role of somatic DSXM in the embryo is regulation of the germline gene expression program. The non-autonomous role of DSXM is not restricted to germline development, as DSXM also non-autonomously regulates the post-embryonic recruitment of mesodermal cells to the male genital disc .
DSXM-expressing cells are in intimate contact with the germline, which may be important to enable the somatic sex determination pathway to influence germ cell development in the embryonic gonad. Somatic gonadal precursors undergo striking shape changes as the gonad coalesces, producing thin cellular extensions that surround the round germ cells at stage 13 . DSXM expression becomes apparent at this stage.
There is also contact between germline and DSXM-positive somatic cells in post-embryonic stages. We found that DSXM is expressed in testes of larvae and adult flies in the somatic cyst cells enveloping all premeiotic germ cell cysts as well as in the hub. DSXM expression was never observed in cyst cells enclosing postmeiotic germ cells, which have completed the transcriptional program required for sperm differentiation [42, 43]. Thus, DSXM appears to be expressed in all the somatic cells that are closely associated with the germ cells from gonad formation until the transcriptional program of spermatogenesis is complete.
All flies were raised and maintained on standard cornmeal media (Tucson Drosophila stock center, Tucson, AZ) at 25°C. A fly strain bearing a construct containing the early Sex lethal promoter, SxlP E ,  upstream of the coding sequence for eGFP on chromosome 3 (Sxl-GFP-3) was used for sexing embryos . Only female embryos of this line express eGFP. Dechorionated embryos were sex sorted by distinguishing fluorescent versus non-fluorescent embryos using the Copas Select sorter (UNION Biometrica, Holliston, MA). 60 embryos from each collection were set aside and allowed to mature to score the sexing efficiency. Only collections showing 100% sexing fidelity were used in experiments. The following mutant alleles were used for analyses: gs(l)N26 ; Df(3R)dsx15 and In(3R)dsx23 ; eya cli-IIE and eya cli-DI  and tjeo2 .
Total RNA was prepared using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) from 3–10, 10–16, 16–22 hour old, sex sorted embryos as well as from testes of male adult flies. Preparation of polyA+-mRNA from all samples was done using the Oligotex mRNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RT-PCR was performed using the OneStep RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). A pair of primers (RT-sense 5'-CGCGCACCACGTCCACATGGCAGCTG-3'; male-antisense 5'-CTCTGGAGTCGGTGGACAAATCTGTGTG-3') flanking two introns was used to amplify an 801 bp cDNA fragment from the dsx m transcript. The amplicons were sequenced for verification. For loading control a separate RT-PCR of each mRNA sample was carried out in parallel using a primer pair (β3 sense 5'-ATCATTTCCGAGGAGCACGGC-3'; β3 antisense 5'-GCCCAGCGAGTGCGTCAATTG-3') for the ubiquitously expressed gene β3-tubulin , which amplifies a 397 bp fragment from the transcript.
Antibodies and immunofluorescence staining
The polyclonal DSXM antibody was made using standard methods (Covance, Princeton, NJ). A peptide containing the C-terminal amino acids SSNGAYHHGHHL was used for immunization of two rats, both of which gave useful antibodies of good titer and were used here.
For cell staining experiments, pre-stage 17 embryos were fixed, devitellinized, and immunostained as described . Because the presence of the cuticle greatly hinders antibody staining, we used a different protocol for stage 17. Fixed stage 17 embryos were rehydrated, washed twice in 1 × PBS + 0.1% Tween 20 (PBT), sonicated in 500 μl PBT (2 pulses of 3 sec. using a Misonix Sonicator 3000 at output setting 1), rewashed twice in PBT and immunostained . Gonads of larvae and adult flies were dissected, fixed and immunostained as described . All stained samples were mounted on slides in Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL).
Antibodies were as follows: mouse anti-FASIII and mouse anti-EYA10H6 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) at 1:50, rabbit anti-SOX100B  at 1:1000, guinea pig anti-TJ  at 1:3000, rabbit anti-VASA (R. Lehmann) at 1:5000, chicken anti-VASA  at 1:1000. For the rat anti-DSXM at 1:500 in general and the rabbit anti-SOX100B at 1:1000 (in Fig 4N) the TSA (Tyramide Signal Amplification) Cyanine 3 technology (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) in combination with the ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingham, CA) was used as the detection system.
The following secondary antibodies were used, all at 1:500: Cy5 goat anti-rabbit, biotin-coupled goat anti-rat, and biotin-coupled goat anti-rabbit (Jackson Immuo-research, West Grove, PA), Alexa 647 goat anti-guinea pig, Alexa 488 goat anti-guinea pig, Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit, Alexa 647 goat anti-mouse, Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse, Alexa 647 goat anti-chicken (Invitrogen Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA). Images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta Confocal Microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) and processed using Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe, San Jose, CA). All figures were annotated using Illustrator 10.0 (Adobe, San Jose, CA). All images in figures are single optical sections as indicated.
DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride) staining was used to visualize the nuclei.
We thank S. DiNardo, M. van Doren, D. Godt, P. Graham, K. Howard, S. Kobayashi, R. Lehmann, S. Russell, P. Schedl, the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank and the Bloomington Stock Center for flies and reagents. We are grateful to members of the Oliver and van Doren labs as well as members of the LCDB for discussion. We also thank the anonymous referees for valuable suggestion on the manuscript. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIDDK.
- Marin I, Baker BS: The evolutionary dynamics of sex determination. Science. 1998, 281 (5385): 1990-1994. 10.1126/science.281.5385.1990.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burtis KC: The regulation of sex determination and sexually dimorphic differentiation in Drosophila. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1993, 5 (6): 1006-1014. 10.1016/0955-0674(93)90085-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cline TW, Meyer BJ: Vive la difference: males vs females in flies vs worms. Annu Rev Genet. 1996, 30: 637-702. 10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.637.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zarkower D: Invertebrates may not be so different after all. Novartis Found Symp. 2002, 244: 115-135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burtis KC, Baker BS: Drosophila doublesex gene controls somatic sexual differentiation by producing alternatively spliced mRNAs encoding related sex-specific polypeptides. Cell. 1989, 56 (6): 997-1010. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90633-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burtis KC, Coschigano KT, Baker BS, Wensink PC: The doublesex proteins of Drosophila melanogaster bind directly to a sex-specific yolk protein gene enhancer. Embo J. 1991, 10 (9): 2577-2582.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Erdman SE, Burtis KC: The Drosophila doublesex proteins share a novel zinc finger related DNA binding domain. Embo J. 1993, 12 (2): 527-535.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker BS, Ridge KA: Sex and the single cell. I. On the action of major loci affecting sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1980, 94 (2): 383-423.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker BS, Wolfner MF: A molecular analysis of doublesex, a bifunctional gene that controls both male and female sexual differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1988, 2 (4): 477-489. 10.1101/gad.2.4.477.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagoshi RN, Baker BS: Regulation of sex-specific RNA splicing at the Drosophila doublesex gene: cis-acting mutations in exon sequences alter sex-specific RNA splicing patterns. Genes Dev. 1990, 4 (1): 89-97. 10.1101/gad.4.1.89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nöthiger R, Jonglez M, Leuthold M, Meier-Gerschwiler P, Weber T: Sex determination in the germ line of Drosophila depends on genetic signals and inductive somatic factors. Development. 1989, 107 (3): 505-518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker BS, Burtis K, Goralski T, Mattox W, Nagoshi R: Molecular genetic aspects of sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome. 1989, 31 (2): 638-645.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Billeter JC, Rideout EJ, Dornan AJ, Goodwin SF: Control of male sexual behavior in Drosophila by the sex determination pathway. Curr Biol. 2006, 16 (17): R766-776. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hildreth PE: Doublesex, Recessive Gene That Transforms Both Males and Females of Drosophila into Intersexes. Genetics. 1965, 51: 659-678.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oliver B, Kim YJ, Baker BS: Sex-lethal, master and slave: a hierarchy of germ-line sex determination in Drosophila. Development. 1993, 119 (3): 897-908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schüpbach T: Autosomal mutations that interfere with sex determination in somatic cells of Drosophila have no direct effect on the germline. Dev Biol. 1982, 89 (1): 117-127. 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90300-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sonnenblick BP: Germ Cell Movements and Sex Differentiation of the Gonads in the Drosophila Embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1941, 27 (10): 484-489. 10.1073/pnas.27.10.484.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore LA, Broihier HT, Van Doren M, Lehmann R: Gonadal mesoderm and fat body initially follow a common developmental path in Drosophila. Development. 1998, 125 (5): 837-844.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rongo C, Broihier HT, Moore L, Van Doren M, Forbes A, Lehmann R: Germ plasm assembly and germ cell migration in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1997, 62: 1-11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Doren M, Mathews WR, Samuels M, Moore LA, Broihier HT, Lehmann R: Fear of intimacy encodes a novel transmembrane protein required for gonad morphogenesis in Drosophila. Development. 2003, 130 (11): 2355-2364. 10.1242/dev.00454.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeFalco TJ, Verney G, Jenkins AB, McCaffery JM, Russell S, Van Doren M: Sex-specific apoptosis regulates sexual dimorphism in the Drosophila embryonic gonad. Dev Cell. 2003, 5 (2): 205-216. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00204-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wawersik M, Milutinovich A, Casper AL, Matunis E, Williams B, Van Doren M: Somatic control of germline sexual development is mediated by the JAK/STAT pathway. Nature. 2005, 436 (7050): 563-567. 10.1038/nature03849.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bopp D, Bell LR, Cline TW, Schedl P: Developmental distribution of female-specific Sex-lethal proteins in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1991, 5 (3): 403-415. 10.1101/gad.5.3.403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keyes LN, Cline TW, Schedl P: The primary sex determination signal of Drosophila acts at the level of transcription. Cell. 1992, 68 (5): 933-943. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90036-C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomancak P, Beaton A, Weiszmann R, Kwan E, Shu S, Lewis SE, Richards S, Ashburner M, Hartenstein V, Celniker SE, et al: Systematic determination of patterns of gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genome Biol. 2002, 3 (12): RESEARCH0088-10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0088.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li MA, Alls JD, Avancini RM, Koo K, Godt D: The large Maf factor Traffic Jam controls gonad morphogenesis in Drosophila. Nat Cell Biol. 2003, 5 (11): 994-1000. 10.1038/ncb1058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyle M, Bonini N, DiNardo S: Expression and function of clift in the development of somatic gonadal precursors within the Drosophila mesoderm. Development. 1997, 124 (5): 971-982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hui Yong Loh S, Russell S: A Drosophila group E Sox gene is dynamically expressed in the embryonic alimentary canal. Mech Dev. 2000, 93 (1–2): 185-188. 10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00258-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Le Bras S, Van Doren M: Development of the male germline stem cell niche in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 2006, 294 (1): 92-103. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.02.030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fuller MT: spermatogenesis. The development of Drosophila melanogaster. Edited by: Bate M, Martinez-Arias A. 2006, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, I: 71-147.Google Scholar
- Fabrizio JJ, Boyle M, DiNardo S: A somatic role for eyes absent (eya) and sine oculis (so) in Drosophila spermatocyte development. Dev Biol. 2003, 258 (1): 117-128. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00127-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aboim AN: Developpement embryonnaire et post-embryonnaire des gonades normales et agametiques de Drosophila melanogaster. Rev Suisse Zool. 1945, 52: 53-154.Google Scholar
- Iida T, Kobayashi S: Delocalization of polar plasm components caused by grandchildless mutations, gs(1)N26 and gs(1)N441, in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Growth Differ. 2000, 42 (1): 53-60. 10.1046/j.1440-169x.2000.00482.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lucchesi JC, Kelly WG, Panning B: Chromatin remodeling in dosage compensation. Annu Rev Genet. 2005, 39: 615-651. 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.094210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keisman EL, Christiansen AE, Baker BS: The sex determination gene doublesex regulates the A/P organizer to direct sex-specific patterns of growth in the Drosophila genital imaginal disc. Dev Cell. 2001, 1 (2): 215-225. 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00027-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kopp A, Duncan I, Godt D, Carroll SB: Genetic control and evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in Drosophila. Nature. 2000, 408 (6812): 553-559. 10.1038/35046017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez L, Gorfinkiel N, Guerrero I: Sex determination genes control the development of the Drosophila genital disc, modulating the response to Hedgehog, Wingless and Decapentaplegic signals. Development. 2001, 128 (7): 1033-1043.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waterbury JA, Jackson LL, Schedl P: Analysis of the doublesex female protein in Drosophila melanogaster: role on sexual differentiation and behavior and dependence on intersex. Genetics. 1999, 152 (4): 1653-1667.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee G, Hall JC, Park JH: Doublesex gene expression in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurogenet. 2002, 16 (4): 229-248. 10.1080/01677060216292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ahmad SM, Baker BS: Sex-specific deployment of FGF signaling in Drosophila recruits mesodermal cells into the male genital imaginal disc. Cell. 2002, 109 (5): 651-661. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00744-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jenkins AB, McCaffery JM, Van Doren M: Drosophila E-cadherin is essential for proper germ cell-soma interaction during gonad morphogenesis. Development. 2003, 130 (18): 4417-4426. 10.1242/dev.00639.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schäfer M, Nayernia K, Engel W, Schäfer U: Translational control in spermatogenesis. Dev Biol. 1995, 172 (2): 344-352. 10.1006/dbio.1995.8049.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renkawitz-Pohl R, Hempel L, Hollmann M, Schäfer MA: Spermatogenesis. Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry, pharmacology and molecular biology. Edited by: Gilbert LI, Iatrou K, Gill S. 2005, Oxford: Elsevier LTd, 1: 157-178.Google Scholar
- Thomson JGP, Schedl P, Pulak R: Sex-specifc GFP-expression in Drosophila embryos and sorting by Copas flow cytometry technique. presented at the 45th Annual Drosophila Research Conference, Washington DC (USA). 2004, March 24–28, 2004Google Scholar
- Niki Y: Developmental analysis of the grandchildless (gs(1)N26) mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: abnormal cleavage patterns and defects in pole cell formation. Dev Biol. 1984, 103 (1): 182-189. 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90019-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker BS, Hoff G, Kaufman TC, Wolfner MF, Hazelrigg T: The doublesex locus of Drosophila melanogaster and its flanking regions: a cytogenetic analysis. Genetics. 1991, 127 (1): 125-138.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nüsslein-Volhard CWE, Kluding H: Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. Zygotic loci on the second hromosome. Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 1984, 193: 267-282. 10.1007/BF00848156.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bialojan S, Falkenburg D, Renkawitz-Pohl R: Characterization and developmental expression of beta tubulin genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Embo J. 1984, 3 (11): 2543-2548.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel NH: Imaging neuronal subsets and other cell types in whole-mount Drosophila embryos and larvae using antibody probes. Methods Cell Biol. 1994, 44: 445-487.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin TY, Viswanathan S, Wood C, Wilson PG, Wolf N, Fuller MT: Coordinate developmental control of the meiotic cell cycle and spermatid differentiation in Drosophila males. Development. 1996, 122 (4): 1331-1341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burnett C, Howard K: Fly and mammalian lipid phosphate phosphatase isoforms differ in activity both in vitro and in vivo. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4 (8): 793-799. 10.1038/sj.embor.embor900.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hartenstein V: Atlas of Drosophila Development. 1993, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
- Boyle M, DiNardo S: Specification, migration and assembly of the somatic cells of the Drosophila gonad. Development. 1995, 121 (6): 1815-1825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brookman JJ, Toosy AT, Shashidhara LS, White RA: The 412 retrotransposon and the development of gonadal mesoderm in Drosophila. Development. 1992, 116 (4): 1185-1192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.