Skip to main content
Download PDF

The MAP kinase ERK and its scaffold protein MP1 interact with the chromatin regulator Corto during Drosophilawing tissue development

BMC Developmental Biology volume 11, Article number: 17 (2011) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades (p38, JNK, ERK pathways) are involved in cell fate acquisition during development. These kinase modules are associated with scaffold proteins that control their activity. In Drosophila, dMP1, that encodes an ERK scaffold protein, regulates ERK signaling during wing development and contributes to intervein and vein cell differentiation. Functional relationships during wing development between a chromatin regulator, the Enhancer of Trithorax and Polycomb Corto, ERK and its scaffold protein dMP1, are examined here.

Results

Genetic interactions show that corto and dMP1 act together to antagonize rolled (which encodes ERK) in the future intervein cells, thus promoting intervein fate. Although Corto, ERK and dMP1 are present in both cytoplasmic and nucleus compartments, they interact exclusively in nucleus extracts. Furthermore, Corto, ERK and dMP1 co-localize on several sites on polytene chromosomes, suggesting that they regulate gene expression directly on chromatin. Finally, Corto is phosphorylated. Interestingly, its phosphorylation pattern differs between cytoplasm and nucleus and changes upon ERK activation.

Conclusions

Our data therefore suggest that the Enhancer of Trithorax and Polycomb Corto could participate in regulating vein and intervein genes during wing tissue development in response to ERK signaling.

Background

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways are evolutionary conserved signaling pathways used by eukaryotic cells to regulate gene expression during diverse processes such as proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, adaptation to changes in their environment, and so on (for a review, see [1]). MAPK proteins are serine-threonine kinases that can phoshorylate targets in the cytoplasm or the nucleus in response to stimuli such as mitogenic or stress signals. MAPKs can be grouped into three classes depending on the stimuli they respond to. Extracellular regulated kinases (ERK) are mainly activated by mitogenic stimuli such as growth factors and hormones, whereas c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) and p38 kinases respond predominantly to stress stimuli. Kinases associate with scaffold proteins that regulate signaling by providing critical spatial and temporal specificities. Notably, the scaffold protein MP1 forms a signaling complex with MEK and ERK thus facilitating ERK activation [2, 3]. One of the best characterized mechanisms by which MAPKs regulate gene expression involves phosphorylation of transcription factors, which consequently modifies their activity, regulating either their intracellular location, their stability, their binding to DNA, or their interactions with regulatory proteins (for a review, see [4]).

Although the traditional view has been that most phosphorylation events do not occur directly at promoters of genes that are ultimately controlled by MAPK pathways, recent reports have highlighted some cases where MAPKs are integral components of transcriptional activation complexes. For example, during mammalian myoblast differentiation, p38 is recruited to the promoters of myogenic genes together with the muscle-regulatory factors MyoD and MEF2C [5]. In pancreatic β-cells, in response to increased glucose concentration, ERK1/2 MAPKs are bound to the insulin gene promoter in the same complex as their transcription factor substrates MafA, Beta2 and PDX-1 [6]. In yeast, the p38-related Hog1 kinase coordinates the transcriptional program required for cell survival upon osmostress: active Hog1 interacts with the transcription factor Hot1, inducing recruitment of Hog1 to osmostress-responsive promoters [7]. Anchoring of Hog1 to chromatin was shown to be important to stimulate the recruitment and activation of RNA Pol II [8]. In addition to this role in transcriptional initiation, Hog1 also behaves as a transcriptional elongation factor [9]. Genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with microarrays (ChIP-Chip) experiments have revealed that two other yeast MAPKs involved in pheromone response, Fus3 and Kss1, are bound to several genes that are expressed upon pheromone pathway activation [10].

Once bound to chromatin, MAPKs do not only modulate transcription factor activity and RNA Pol II recruitment, but also regulate gene expression by inducing changes in chromatin organization and epigenetic histone modifications. Indeed, yeast Hog1 facilitates recruitment of either the histone deacetylase Rpd3-Sin3 complex [11], the SAGA complex which contains both histone acetylation and de-ubiquitylation activities [12], or the SWI-SNF chromatin remodeling complex [13]. During mammalian myoblast differentiation, p38 targets the SWI-SNF complex [5] as well as the ASH2L Trithorax complex, that contains a histone methyl-transferase, to muscle-specific genes [14]. It is tempting to speculate that binding of these complexes to chromatin relies on phosphorylation of some of their components by MAPKs. For example in mammals, the downstream MAPKAP3 kinase, once activated by phosphorylation in response to mitogenic or stress signals, phosphorylates some members of the chromatin Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1). This results in dissociation of PRC1 from chromatin and subsequent de-repression of target genes [15]. Altogether, these data show that chromatin reorganization mediated by nucleosome remodeling and epigenetic mark modifications is an important process to regulate gene expression in response to MAPK signaling. This process could involve a dynamic switch between the binding of either a silencing complex or an activating complex on a target gene.

In most of the examples mentioned above, these repressing and activating complexes are formed by proteins of the Polycomb-group (PcG) and Trithorax-group (TrxG) which combine into several heteromeric complexes that bind chromatin. PcG and TrxG complexes regulate gene expression by modulating chromatin structure, in particular by depositing specific post-translational histone modifications and by nucleosome remodeling. PcG complexes lead to compact, transcriptionally inactive chromatin, whereas TrxG complexes counteract PcG-mediated repression and maintain chromatin in an open conformation that facilitates transcription (for a review, see [16]). A third class of proteins, the Enhancers of Trithorax and Polycomb (ETP), is involved in PcG- as well as TrxG-mediated gene regulation (for a review, see [17]). Interestingly, ETPs allow the recruitment on chromatin of either PcG or TrxG complexes and could therefore participate in a switch between activation and repression. The first ETP mutants have been identified in Drosophila as enhancers of both Polycomb-group (PcG) and trithorax-group (trxG) mutations [18]. Although not found in any of the PcG or TrxG core complexes purified so far, ETPs interact with these complexes and are required for both PcG-mediated silencing and TrxG-mediated activation. For example, mutants of the ETP gene Asx enhance homeotic phenotypes of both PcG and trxG mutations [19]. The GAGA factor encoded by Trithorax-like (Trl) was first described as an activator of Hox gene expression and later shown to play a role in recruitment of PcG complexes [20, 21]. The HMGB protein DSP1 behaves as an ETP since a dsp1 null allele exhibits a PcG phenotype but enhances at the same time the phenotype of several trxG mutants [22]. Furthermore, DSP1 is required for PcG complex recruitment to chromatin [23]. Lastly, corto, which is ubiquitously expressed all along development, presents the characteristics of an ETP since loss-of-function mutants exhibit both PcG and trxG phenotypes and enhance the phenotype of some PcG as well as trxG mutants [24, 25]. The Corto protein interacts not only with PcG and TrxG proteins, but also with other ETPs such as GAGA and DSP1, which suggests that different combinations of ETPs could favor the recruitment of either PcG or TrxG complexes on chromatin [26, 27]. Nevertheless, the mechanism through which ETPs could exert this dual function remains to be investigated.

corto loss-of-function mutants exhibit several phenotypes, among them ectopic veins on wings which recall the phenotype induced by a gain-of-function mutation of rolled (rl) that encodes the MAPK ERK [25, 28]. In Drosophila, specification and differentiation of wing tissues (i.e. vein and intervein) occur in wing imaginal discs during the third larval and pupal stages and rely on several developmental signals including those mediated by EGF, BMP, Hedgehog and Wnt (for a review, see [29]). Signaling mediated by the Drosophila EGF Receptor (DER) is crucial for early specification of the longitudinal vein primordia called proveins, as well as for differentiation of vein and intervein cells (for a review, see [30]). Once activated by one of its ligands, DER activates a phosphorylation cascade leading to ERK signaling. Early ERK signaling in wing discs of third instar larvae specifies provein [31]. In provein territories, ERK maintains expression of rhomboïd (rho), which is required to direct provein cells to differentiate as vein cells [32]. rho encodes a serine-threonine protease which is required to process EGFR ligands and thus participates in a positive feed-back loop that maintains high levels of ERK activity [33, 34]. On the other hand, ERK signaling represses blistered (bs) expression. bs, that encodes a homolog of the mammalian Serum Response Factor (SRF), is expressed in the future intervein cells and controls the specification of intervein tissue [35, 36]. Later during development, at the pupal stage, ERK signaling is also required to promote intervein cell differentiation [31]. The formation of vein and intervein tissues thus depends on the outcome of a fine-tuned balance between rho and bs expression patterns, which are both regulated by ERK signaling. Furthermore, the scaffold protein dMP1 also participates in ERK signaling during vein and intervein differentiation [3]. The wing phenotype of corto mutants, but also the fact that we isolated dMP1 in a two-hybrid screen using Corto as bait, prompted us to address the potential role of this ETP in relation to ERK signaling during wing vein and intervein differentiation. Our genetic interactions between corto and genes encoding some actors of the ERK signaling pathway, i.e. rl itself, dMP1, bs and rho show that corto and dMP1 contribute to antagonize rl vein-promoting function in future intervein cells. Biochemical analyzes show that Corto interacts directly with ERK. Furthermore, Corto is phosphorylated and its phosphorylation increases upon ERK activation. Surprisingly, ERK and dMP1 associate with Corto exclusively in the nucleus. As suggested by immunolocalizations on polytene chromosomes, a dMP1/ERK/Corto complex might be targeted to chromatin to directly regulate gene expression, thus allowing proper wing tissue differentiation.

Results and Discussion

cortocontributes to intervein tissue differentiation

We first investigated the ectopic vein phenotype of corto mutants using three different recessive lethal alleles: corto420 , corto07128b and cortoL1 . corto420 is a deletion of the corto locus [25], corto 07128b a P-element insertion located 0.5 kb upstream of corto 5'-UTR [37], and corto L1 an EMS-induced mutation [38]. As already described for corto420 [24, 25], heteroallelic combinations using corto07128b , cortoL1 and a deficiency encompassing corto [Df(3R)6-7] are poorly viable, since we observed 0% to 10% escapers depending on combinations. Therefore, these three alleles are true loss-of-function alleles. This was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR analysis on wing discs from third instar larvae, that showed absence of corto transcripts in corto420 /Df(3R)6-7 and corto07128b /Df(3R)6-7 larvae (Figure 1). In contrast, cortoL1/Df(3R)6-7 larvae exhibited the same level of corto transcripts as wild-type flies, which suggests that the mutation in cortoL1 rather affects the level or activity of Corto protein.

Figure 1
figure1

Quantification of corto transcripts by quantitative RT-PCR on wing discs from corto420/Df(3R)6-7 , cortoL1/Df(3R)6-7 and corto07128b/Df(3R)6-7 third instar larvae. The relative corto expression level was obtained by normalization on rp49 (black bars) or spt6 (grey bars) level. For each mutant genotype, this normalized level was compared to that of wild type (w1118) wing discs.

Full size image

As already described [25], corto420/+ heterozygous flies exhibited very few ectopic veins (2.2% to 8.6%). This phenotype was more penetrant in cortoL1/+ (49% to 52.2%) and corto07128b/+ (97.4% to 97.8%) heterozygous flies (Table 1 and Figure 2A). Since both corto420 and corto07128b are devoid of corto transcripts, the discrepancy between these alleles may be a consequence of an interaction with the genetic background. For all combinations, the few heteroallelic corto escapers displayed a stronger ectopic vein phenotype than corto heterozygous flies (Figure 2B-D). Ectopic veins mainly arose close to longitudinal veins 2, 3, 5 and to the posterior cross-vein, which seems to be the case for most mutations that induce ectopic vein phenotypes [32]. Interestingly, over-expressing corto using a UAS::corto construct and the wing specific Beadex::Gal4 (Bx::Gal4, data not shown) or scalloped::Gal4 (sd::Gal4) driver also induced extra pieces of vein tissue in all flies (Figure 2E). Since both corto over-expression and loss-of-function induced the same phenotype, one possibility is that Corto may be required in stoechiometric amount to allow correct wing tissue differentiation. This feature characterizes proteins that act through formation of complexes. Indeed, complexes are very sensitive to the relative amounts of their components, and can be disrupted either by an excess or a shortage of one of these [39].

Table 1 corto mutants induce ectopic vein phenotypes and interact with blistered (bs) and rhomboïd (rho) during wing tissue differentiation
Full size table
Figure 2
figure2

corto regulates wing tissue differentiation in interaction with blistered ( bs) and rhomboïd ( rho ). (A): Wings from corto07128b/+ flies exhibit ectopic veins (shown by asterisks) within intervein tissue (L1-L5: longitudinal veins; ACV and PCV: anterior and posterior cross-veins). (B, C, D): This phenotype is more severe in flies heteroallelic for corto loss-of-function mutations (corto07128b/cortoL1; corto07128b/corto420; corto L1/Df(3R)6-7 ). (E): corto over-expression induces ectopic veins (shown by asterisks). (F to J): corto07128b enhances the ectopic vein phenotype (shown by asterisks) and the blistered phenotype (shown by arrows) induced by the bsEY23316 loss-of-function allele (F, G, H) and by rho over-expression using the rhoEP3704 allele (I, J). (K, L): in situ hybridization of 30 h pupal wings from cortoL1/Df(3R)6-7 mutants with bs probe (K) or rho probe (L); white asterisks point to bs and rho deregulation.

Full size image

In order to assess the temporal requirement for corto function in wing tissue differentiation, we crossed the UAS::corto line with the hs::Gal4 driver strain allowing staged Gal4 expression (Table 2). The highest percentage of ectopic vein phenotype was obtained when heat-shock was applied between 96 to 120 hours after egg laying, which corresponds to the mid to late third instar larval stage. Interestingly, it has been shown that, from late third instar larval stage to pupal stage, down-regulation of ERK signaling is crucial for wing tissue formation: indeed, expression of a constitutively active form of the MAPKK Raf at the third instar larval stage induces vein loss, whereas expression of a dominant negative form of the receptor DER at pupal stage leads to formation of ectopic veins [31].

Table 2 Staged corto over-expression induced ectopic vein phenotypes mostly during late larval development
Full size table

In conclusion, corto misregulation (either loss-of-function or over-expression) induced ectopic veins that formed within intervein tissue and never truncated veins. This observation suggested that Corto contributes to intervein tissue differentiation, whereas it does not seem to be involved in vein formation. We have previously shown that corto interacts with some TrxG genes during wing tissue formation. Indeed, moira, kismet and ash1 mutants enhance the ectopic vein phenotype of corto420 [25]. Furthermore, several corto alleles enhance the ectopic vein phenotype of mutations in snr1 that encodes a component of the SWI/SNF complex [38, 40], a chromatin-remodeling complex also involved in wing tissue differentiation [41–43]. One hypothesis is that Corto, as an ETP, could participate in the recruitment of TrxG complexes to regulate expression of genes involved in wing tissue differentiation.

To clarify the role of corto in the formation of intervein tissue, we performed genetic interaction assays between corto and the intervein-promoting gene blistered (bs), or the vein-promoting gene rhomboïd (rho). As expected for a bs loss-of-function allele [35, 36], wings of flies heterozygous for bsEY23316 exhibited a moderate ectopic vein phenotype, but none showed blisters in the wings (Table 1 and Figure 2F). corto07128b enhanced the ectopic vein phenotype induced by bsEY23316 (compare Figure 2G to Figure 2F). In addition, 32.5% of these trans-heterozygous flies had blisters in the wings (Table 1 and Figure 2H). These blisters, which result from impaired adhesion between the ventral and dorsal wing surfaces, could be caused by formation of many vein cells within intervein tissue. They are frequently observed in bs mutants [35] or when rho is over-expressed [36]. This result therefore showed that bs and corto act synergistically to promote intervein cell fate. Ectopic over-expression of rho using the rhoEP3704 allele and the sd::Gal4 driver induced ectopic veins for most of the flies and in a few cases (9.5%) formation of blisters (Figure 2I and Table 1). This phenotype was similar to that induced by over-expressing rho under control of a heat-inducible promoter [32]. Both corto420 and corto07128b alleles enhanced this phenotype since the number of flies with blisters in the wings significantly increased (Table 1 and Figure 2J). This observation showed that corto antagonizes rho in vein formation.

Taken together, these results suggest that corto might antagonize rl vein-promoting function in future intervein cells. corto misregulation could therefore lead to deregulation of certain vein and intervein-promoting genes. Indeed, we observed deregulation of bs and rho in some intervein cells of pupal wings from cortoL1/Df(3R)6-7 escapers: in these cells, bs is down-regulated (Figure 2K) whereas rho is ectopically expressed (Figure 2L).These cells could thus acquire a vein fate.

Corto and dMP1 act together and participate in the control of wing tissue differentiation

Since the wing phenotype of corto mutants resembles the one induced by hyperactivation of ERK signaling pathway, we wondered whether corto was involved in the regulation of this pathway during wing development. We first tested genetic interactions between corto and rolled using the UAS::rolled strain which allows targeted ERK over-expression when crossed with a Gal4 driver. All flies over-expressing rolled with the sd::Gal4 driver at 25°C exhibited a mild ectopic vein phenotype ([3] and Figure 3A). Expressivity of this phenotype was enhanced by the corto07128b allele (Figure 3B). This result suggests that the roles of corto and rolled in vein-promoting function are antagonistic.

Figure 3
figure3

corto interacts with rl and dMP1 during wing development. (A, B): corto loss-of-function (corto07128b) enhances the ectopic vein phenotype (shown by asterisks) induced by rl over-expression. (C, D): corto loss-of-function (corto07128b) diminishes the blistered phenotype (shown by arrows) induced by rlSem over-expression. (E, F): corto loss-of-function (corto07128b) enhances the ectopic vein phenotype (shown by asterisks) induced by dMP1 down-regulation.

Full size image

We also used the UAS::rolledSem (rlSem ) transgene that encodes a hyper-active form of ERK [28, 44]. At 18°C, flies that over-expressed the UAS::rlSem transgene under control of the sd::Gal4 driver exhibited ectopic veins. This phenotype was much stronger than the one induced by rolled over-expression (compare Figure 3 to 3). For 88% of these flies, this phenotype was very strong since one or the two wings showed blisters (Table 3 and Figure 3C). Surprisingly, penetrance and expressivity of the rlSem over-expression phenotype were lowered by corto420 and corto07128b alleles, as only 49.4% of corto420 flies and 55.1% of corto07128b ones exhibited blisters in one or both wings (Table 3) and blisters were smaller (Figure 3D). This result confirmed that corto and rl interact during wing tissue formation. However, the observation that corto mutation enhanced a mild-activation of ERK pathway (as induced by UAS::rl) whereas slowing-down a hyper-activation (as induced by UAS::rlSem ) is paradoxical and requires further experiments to be fully understood.

Table 3 corto interacts with rolled (rl) and dMP1 during wing tissue differentiation
Full size table

We have recently shown that the Drosophila ortholog of MP1, dMP1, antagonizes rl vein-promoting function in the future intervein cells of the wing [3]. Furthermore, we isolated dMP1 in a two-hybrid screen using Corto as bait (see below and Figure 4B). We thus tested the genetic interactions between corto and dMP1. As already described [3], down-regulation of dMP1 by RNA interference using the sd::Gal4 driver induced ectopic veins in 78.5% of flies (Table 3 and Figure 3E). This percentage increased to 92.2% and 100% in combination with corto420 or corto07128b , respectively (Table 3). With corto07128b , the expressivity of the ectopic vein phenotype was also enhanced (compare Figure 3F to Figure2A and 3E). Therefore, these results showed that corto and dMP1 act synergistically and participate in intervein tissue differentiation in response to ERK signaling.

Figure 4
figure4

Corto interacts in vitro directly with ERK and indirectly with dMP1. (A): GST pull-down assays show direct interaction between Corto and ERK. Top: Schematic representation of Corto full-length and truncated forms (black box: chromodomain; grey boxes: COOH-terminal globular domains). Bottom: Coomassie staining of fusion proteins (shown by arrows) and autoradiography of the GST pull-down assays with in vitro translated 35S-ERK. (B): Leucine test of two-hybrid experiment shows that the NH2-terminal half of Corto (LexA-C1/324 corresponding to amino-acids 1-324) interacts with full length dMP1 (B42AD-dMP1). Negative controls: LexA and B42AD-dMP1; LexA-C1/324 and B42AD; positive controls: LexA53 and B42ADT. (C): GST pull-down assays using a GST-dMP1 fusion protein show that the Corto-dMP1 interaction is not direct. Top: Coomassie staining of fusion proteins (shown by arrows). Middle: autoradiography of the GST pull-down assays showing no specific interaction between GST-dMP1 beads and in vitro translated 35S-Corto. Bottom: peptide pull-down assay using total embryonic protein extract and GST-dMP1 shows that Corto (revealed by anti-Corto antibodies) is specifically retained on GST-dMP1 beads (shown by an arrow).

Full size image

Corto interacts in vitrodirectly with ERK and indirectly with dMP1

We have previously shown that dMP1 forms a complex with ERK, which is required for the proper development of intervein cells [3]. To understand the molecular bases of the relationship between Corto, dMP1 and ERK, we first questioned the physical interaction between Corto and ERK. We carried out GST pull-down assays using in vitro translated ERK and GST-Corto fusion proteins. Structural analysis of Corto has shown that this 550 amino-acid protein contains three globular domains that might correspond to functional domains ([26] and Figure 4A). The first one is located at position 127-203 and exhibits strong structural similarities with chromodomains, that are chromatin targeting modules found in some regulators of chromatin structure (for a review, see [45]). The two others, located at positions 418-455 and 480-550, present no obvious similarities with known protein domains. In vitro translated ERK protein was retained on GST-C1/324 and GST-C325/550 beads containing the NH2-terminal half and the COOH-terminal half of Corto, respectively (Figure 4A). In contrast, ERK was not retained on GST-C127/207 beads containing the Corto chromodomain, or on GST-C418/503 beads containing part of the two COOH-terminal globular domains. The lack of interaction with GST-C127/207 and GST-C418/503 suggested that none of these domains was sufficient to mediate Corto-ERK interaction, either because of inappropriate folding of these short domains in the GST fusion proteins, or because none of these two fragments contains the sequences that mediate ERK binding. Taken together, these results showed that Corto interacts directly with ERK in vitro. Further experiments are needed to determine the precise domains or residues that mediate the interaction between Corto and ERK.

Since we isolated dMP1 in a two-hybrid screen using the NH2-terminal part of Corto as a bait (Figure 4B), we next questioned the physical interaction between Corto and dMP1. We performed GST pull-down assays using GST-dMP1 fusion protein and in vitro translated Corto to see whether their interaction was direct or indirect. Indeed, indirect interactions via yeast proteins have already been observed in two-hybrid experiments [46]. As shown in the middle panel of Figure 4C, the same result was obtained using GST or GST-dMP1 beads indicating that there was no specific direct interaction between Corto and dMP1. However, by incubating GST-dMP1 beads with total embryonic protein extract, we observed after blotting with anti-Corto antibodies that Corto was specifically retained on GST-dMP1 beads (bottom panel of Figure 4C). Therefore, we concluded that Corto and dMP1 interact via additional factors. One potential candidate could be ERK, since it directly interacts with Corto (as shown above) and with dMP1 [3].

Corto is located both in the cytoplasm and the nucleus and is phosphorylated

Upon activation of the MAPK cascade, ERK is phosphorylated in the cytoplasm. Di-phosphorylated ERK (dP-ERK) phosphorylates in turn a large number of targets with diverse functions and different subcellular localizations. In particular, part of dP-ERK is translocated into the nucleus where it phosphorylates some transcription factors (for reviews, see [1, 4]). Mammalian MP1 is present in the cytoplasm in association with ERK but its possible nuclear localization has not been reported [47, 48]. Nevertheless, we have recently shown that dMP1 is present both in the cytoplasm and the nucleus [3]. We thus asked whether Corto was present in the same compartments as ERK and dMP1. Corto was detected in nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts from embryos (Figure 5A), third instar larvae (data not shown) and Schneider S2 cells (Figure 5B). A similar nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution was observed for a Corto-FLAG fusion protein expressed in S2 cells (Figure 5C). Both Corto and Corto-FLAG exhibited several isoforms very close to each other in size, with the lowest isoforms being more abundant in the cytoplasm than in the nucleus (Figure 5A-C). Corto is very rich in serine (16%), threonine (4.5%), tyrosine (2.9%), and presents many predicted phosphorylation sites for several kinases distributed all along the sequence (according to NetPhos predictions: 28 phosphorylable serines, 6 threonines, and 3 tyrosines). Hence we checked whether the isoforms we observed could indeed correspond to differentially phosphorylated molecules. As shown in Figure 5D, the upper bands of Corto-FLAG disappeared after lambda phosphatase treatment. Altogether, these results showed that Corto is a phosphorylated protein present both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus. In addition, the Corto phosphorylation pattern seemed to be different between the two cellular compartments, with enrichment in highly phosphorylated forms in the nucleus. Phosphorylation of M33, a chromatin regulator, has been shown to regulate its nuclear translocation [49]. Further experiments are required to determine if Corto localization is regulated through a similar mechanism.

Figure 5
figure5

Corto is a phosphorylated protein located both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus. (A to C): Corto is present in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus and exhibits several isoforms very close in size (indicated by a brace). In the nucleus, the higher isoforms are predominant. (A, B): Western-blot using anti-Corto antibodies and cytoplasmic or nuclear extracts from wild-type embryos (A) or S2 cells (B). (C): Western-blot with anti-FLAG antibodies using cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts from S2 cells expressing or not a Corto-FLAG fusion protein. Cyt: 50 μg cytoplasmic extract; Nuc: 10 μg nuclear extract. In A, B, C, β-tubulin and lamin were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear loading controls, respectively. (D): The different Corto isoforms correspond to proteins that are differently phosphorylated: Western-blot with anti-FLAG antibodies after phosphatase treatment of 15 μg total extract from S2 cells expressing a Corto-FLAG fusion protein shows that the upper band disappears. In this experiment, only the two major Corto-FLAG isoforms are visible because of the low amount of total extract loaded.

Full size image

The phosphorylation pattern of Corto is controlled at least partially by ERK pathway

Since Corto is phosphorylated and interacts in vitro with ERK, it is tempting to speculate that Corto could be phosphorylated in response to activation of the corresponding MAP kinase cascade. To answer this question, we transfected S2 cells in absence of serum with a plasmid allowing Corto-FLAG expression. After two days, we transiently activated the MAP kinase cascade by a short (15 minutes) treatment either with serum, with serum plus insulin or with serum plus PMA. In all three conditions, faint upper Corto isoforms appeared (brace on Figure 6A, upper panel), showing that Corto phosphorylation was induced very rapidly upon ERK activation. To confirm the existence of these faint upper isoforms, we immunoprecipitated Corto from these extracts using anti-FLAG antibodies and blotted the immunoprecipitates with antibodies directed against phosphoproteins (Figure 6A, lower panel). This experiment revealed first that Corto is constitutively phosphorylated even without MAP kinase activation. Second, ERK activation induced an hyperphosphorylation of Corto since an upper smear containing several bands very close in size appeared in all three conditions of activation tested.

Figure 6
figure6

The phosphorylation pattern of Corto depends on the level of ERK pathway activity. (A): S2 cells in 0% fetal calf serum were transfected with a plasmid allowing Corto-FLAG over-expression. 48 hours after transfection, they were submitted to short ERK pathway activation by a 15 minutes treatment with either 10% fetal calf serum (lane 2), 10% fetal calf serum plus insulin 10 μg/ml (lane 3) or 10% fetal calf serum plus PMA 100 ng/ml (lane 4). Total protein extracts were either directly analyzed by Western blot with anti-FLAG antibodies (upper panel), or submitted to immunoprecipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies followed by immunoblotting with anti-phosphoprotein antibodies (lower panel). The braces point to the upper Corto isoforms that appear in response to ERK activation. The asterisk on the lower panel shows the heavy IgG chains, which have already been shown to be phosphorylated [62]. (B): Serum-starved S2 cells were either transfected with a plasmid allowing Corto-FLAG expression (lane 1), or co-transfected with Corto-FLAG and ERK-FLAG (lane 2), Corto-FLAG and ERKSem-FLAG (lane 3) or Corto-FLAG and RasV12 (lane 4), in order to constitutively activate the ERK pathway. After 48 hours, total protein extracts were analyzed by Western blot using anti-FLAG antibodies.

Full size image

As another way to activate the ERK pathway, we co-expressed Corto-FLAG and tagged forms of either ERK, ERKSem or RasV12 in S2 cells. Similar to ERK and ERKSem over-expression, over-expression in flies of a constitutively active form of Ras, RasV12, induces ectopic vein cells [50]. Surprisingly, smaller Corto isoforms appeared when constitutively activating the ERK pathway with either ERK, ERKSem or RasV12 (Figure 6B). One possibility is that these smaller isoforms could correspond to partially dephosphorylated Corto molecules. Taken together, these experiments demonstrate that Corto presents a complex phosphorylation pattern that depends at least on ERK signaling. It is tempting to speculate that some phosphorylations are performed directly by ERK. Indeed, Corto contains 3 SP sites at positions 139, 190 and 428 that correlate with theoretical ERK1/ERK2 phosphorylation sites [51]. Identification of Corto phosphorylation sites as well as phospho-mutant analysis and determination of Corto phosphorylation status when bound to chromatin would help to better understand the role of these phosphorylation events.

Interaction between ERK and dMP1 or Corto takes place in the nucleus only

We next performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments to see whether Corto interacts with ERK and dMP1 in vivo. We have previously shown that ERK and dMP1 co-immunoprecipitate in a total protein extract [3]. In order to determine the subcellular localization of this dMP1/ERK complex, we carried out co-immunoprecipitation experiments using cytoplasmic or nuclear extracts of S2 cells expressing dMP1 and ERK tagged proteins. Surprisingly, dMP1-Myc co-immunoprecipitated with ERK-FLAG in the nuclear extract only (Figure 7A). Corto-Myc and ERK-FLAG also co-immunoprecipitated in the nuclear extract only (Figure 7B). In this last experiment, all Corto isoforms were co-immunoprecipitated with ERK. In both cases, the lack of co-immunoprecipitation in cytoplasmic extracts was confirmed by using two different protocols to prepare nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts (see the Methods section). The co-immunoprecipitation observed between Corto and ERK fusion proteins was confirmed with endogenous proteins from a total embryonic extract using anti-dP-ERK antibody (Figure 7C). Furthermore, this experiment showed that Corto was able to interact with dP-ERK. Lastly, we observed no co-immunoprecipitation between Corto-FLAG and dMP1-Myc whether in total, cytoplasmic or nuclear extracts (data not shown). Labile protein interactions can be stabilized by cross-linking before performing cell extracts, although such treatment does not allow separating cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts. When using a total extract from cross-linked cells, we could detect co-immunoprecipitation between Corto-FLAG and dMP1-Myc (Figure 7D). This observation was consistent with our GST pull-down and peptide pull-down assays showing that the interaction between dMP1 and Corto was not direct but was probably mediated by other proteins. Altogether, our co-immunoprecipitation results suggest that a complex containing Corto, ERK and dMP1 might exist in the nucleus only. The core protein of this complex should be ERK, since it interacts directly with both Corto and dMP1.

Figure 7
figure7

Corto interacts in vivo with ERK in the nucleus only. (A, B): ERK-FLAG co-immunoprecipitates with dMP1-Myc (A) and Corto-Myc (B) only in nuclear extracts. Immunoprecipitation was performed with either anti-FLAG (FLAG-IP) or anti-HA (Mock-IP) antibodies. Cytoplasmic (Cyt) and nuclear (Nuc) extracts from S2 cells expressing tagged proteins were analyzed by Western blot using β-tubulin and lamin as cytoplasmic and nuclear loading controls, respectively. Note that ERK-FLAG (about 50 kDa) co-migrates with the heavy IgG chains (asterisks). (C): Corto co-immunoprecipitates with the di-phosphorylated form of ERK (dP-ERK) in a total embryonic extract. Immunoprecipitated proteins were revealed using rat anti-Corto antibodies. (D): dMP1-Myc co-immunoprecipitates with Corto-FLAG only after cross-linking of cells before protein extraction. Immunoprecipitation was performed using either anti-Myc (Myc-IP) or anti-HA (Mock-IP) antibodies. In A, B, D, immunoprecipitated proteins were revealed by Western-blot using anti-FLAG or anti-Myc antibodies. Arrows and braces show immunoprecipitated tagged proteins and asterisks point to heavy or light IgG chains. In A and D, the light IgG chains in the mock-IP lanes are poorly recognized by the secondary antibodies, but are clearly visible when membranes were stained with Ponceau red (data not shown). S: supernatant after immunoprecipitation; IP: protein G-agarose beads. 5% of the input and 50% of the immunoprecipitate were loaded onto the gel.

Full size image

ERK and dMP1 bind polytene chromosomes where they partially co-localize with Corto

To further analyze the relationship between Corto, dMP1 and ERK, and since Corto has been shown to bind polytene chromosomes [26], we analyzed the binding of ERK and dMP1 onto polytene chromosomes. We observed that ERK and dMP1 bound polytene chromosomes on many sites where they completely co-localized (Figure 8A). Furthermore, Corto and dMP1 co-localized on several sites (Figure 8B-C). These results suggest that a dMP1/ERK/Corto complex might regulate targets directly on chromatin. Since the co-localization of Corto with dMP1 is not complete, Corto appears to be an optional partner of dMP1/ERK on chromatin. Corto association may require additional factors or may be controlled by signaling events.

Figure 8
figure8

ERK and dMP1 bind polytene chromosomes where they partially co-localize with Corto. (A): Immunostaining of polytene chromosomes using rabbit anti-ERK (C-16) (left), and guinea-pig anti-dMP1 (center). DNA was stained with DAPI. ERK and dMP1 co-localize on all sites (right). The staining observed with dMP1 antibodies on centromeric heterochromatin and chromosome four (asterisk) is non-specific, since the same staining was observed with the pre-immune serum (data not shown). (B): Immunostaining of polytene chromosomes with rabbit anti-Corto antibodies (left) and guinea-pig anti-dMP1 antibodies (center). Corto and dMP1 co-localize on a number of sites (right, arrows). (C): Magnification of chromosome 3L extremity showing that Corto and dMP1 co-localize on several sites (yellow arrows).

Full size image

Previously, other scaffold proteins have been reported to bind chromatin. This is the case of the scaffold protein Ste5p in the pheromone pathway of yeast which interacts with the MAPKs Fus3p and Kss1p and occupies the same mating-type genes. Ste5p has then been suggested to function as an adaptor for protein-protein interactions both at the plasma membrane and in the nucleus [10]. In mammals, the scaffold protein β-arrestin, localized both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus, is also recruited to target promoters under opioid receptor stimulation thus enhancing gene transcription [52]. The scaffold protein dMP1 could serve as an adaptor to connect ERK with other partners directly on chromatin. It could also allow ERK to form dimers, as mammalian scaffold proteins have been shown to be essential to connect ERK dimers to cytoplasmic targets [53]. It would therefore be interesting to know if ERK is monomeric or dimeric when bound to chromatin.

Conclusions

We show here that the ETP corto, rl and dMP1 interact during wing tissue differentiation in Drosophila. Corto, ERK and dMP1 form a complex exclusively in the nucleus. In addition, these proteins bind polytene chromosomes where they partially co-localize, suggesting that the Corto-ERK-dMP1 complex might regulate vein and/or intervein gene expression directly on chromatin. Future experiments will be needed to test whether this complex, via the ETP Corto, participates in the recruitment of TrxG complexes on target genes in response to ERK signaling.

Methods

Drosophilastrains and genetic crosses

Flies were raised on standard yeast-cornmeal medium at 25°C. w1118 was used as control strain. The cortoL1 (EMS-induced allele), corto07128b , bsEY23316 , rhoEP3704 (P-insertion alleles) lines were from the Bloomington Stock Center. The corto420 line results from imprecise P-element excision [24, 25]. The transgenic lines UAS::corto [24] (transgene on the third chromosome), UAS::rolled (transgene on the X chromosome) and UAS::rlSem [54] (transgene on the third chromosome) were gifts from Dr. R. Rosset (UAS::corto) and Dr. K. Moses (UAS::rl and UAS::rlSem ). The UAS::dsMP1 line allowing dMP1 down-regulation by RNA interference (transgene on the second chromosome) was described previously [3]. Lines containing a transgene with UAS sequences were crossed with the hs::Gal4, scalloped::Gal4 (sd::Gal4, [55]) and Beadex::Gal4 (Bx::Gal4, [56]) drivers. All crosses were performed at 25°C, except those of UAS::rlSem with sd::Gal4 that were performed at 18°C to decrease Gal4 activity and therefore lower transgene expression. To perform staged corto expression with the hs::Gal4 driver, Gal4 was induced by 20 minute heat-shocks applied at various moments during larval and pupal development.

In situhybridization experiments on pupal wings

White pupae were collected and maintained for 30 h at 25°C. After puparium dissection, pupae were fixed in 8% formaldehyde for 12 h at 4°C. In situ hybridization with blistered (EST SD23611) and rhomboïd (EST RE59529) DIG-UTP labeled RNA probes was performed according to standard protocols [57].

Q-RT PCR experiments

Total RNA were extracted from 20 third instar larval discs of each genotype using the PureLink RNA Microkit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. 1 μg of RNA was reverse-transcribed with the SuperScript® VILO™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen). Q-RT PCR experiments were carried out on a Light Cycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics) with the Maxima SybrGreen mix (Fermentas). The primers used were: cortoF (5'-TGGCCACAGTTCCTAGCATT-3') and cortoR (5'-GCATGGGATTGGTGTCAGG-3'); rp49F (5'-CCGCTTCAAGGGACAGTATC-3') and rp49R (5'-GACAATCTCCTTGCGCTTC-3'); spt6F (5-'CGGAGGAGCTCTTCGATATG-3') and spt6R (5'-GACAGCTCTGGGAAGTCGTC-3'). A standard curve of amplification efficiency for each set of primers was generated with a serial dilution of cDNA. rp49 or spt6 levels were used for normalization according to the standard curve method. Three independent experiments were performed.

Plasmids and S2 cell transfection

The corto, dMP1, rl and rlSem cDNAs were cloned into Gateway® Drosophila vectors allowing expression of the fusion proteins under control of the actin5C promoter, as previously described [3]. The rlSem sequence was obtained by in vitro mutagenesis using the QuickChange® Site Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's instructions. This gain-of-function mutation is a G to A transition resulting in a D to N substitution at position 334 [28]. pMT-RasV12 (a gift from Dr. A. Nagel) allowed transient expression of the constitutively active form of Ras, RasV12, under the control of the heavy metal inducible promoter metallothionein [58]. RasV12 was induced by treating transfected cells for 24 h with CuSO4 0.5 mM. For transfection, S2 cells were cultivated at 25°C in Schneider medium with or without 10% fetal calf serum as indicated. 5.106 cells were transfected with 2 μg of DNA using Effecten® transfection reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions (1/10 DNA-Effecten® ratio). Cells were collected 48 h (ERK pathway activation) or 72 h (immunoprecipitation) after transfection.

Protein extracts and phosphatase treatment

Embryos and S2 cell total extracts were prepared by sonication in RIPA buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaVO4, 25 mM NaF, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% NP40, complete protease inhibitors (Roche)]. Cytoplasmic extracts were prepared either with NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's instructions or by homogenization using a Dounce potter in low salt buffer as described in [59]. When analyzed by immunoprecipitation, these two kinds of cytoplasmic extracts gave the same results. Nuclear extracts were obtained by sonication of the nuclear pellet in RIPA buffer. Phosphatase treatments of S2 cell extracts prepared without NaVO4 and NaF phosphatase inhibitors were performed using Lambda Protein Phosphatase (Upstate) for a 10 minute incubation time at 37°C.

Western blot analysis and antibodies

Cell lysates or immunoprecipitated proteins were resolved on 8% SDS-PAGE Anderson gels [60] when separating different isoforms of Corto, or on 12% or 15% classical SDS-PAGE depending on the molecular weight of proteins. Western blot experiments were performed according to standard protocols. Antibodies used were monoclonal anti-FLAG (F3165, Sigma) or anti-Myc (sc-40, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibodies for fusion proteins, anti-β- tubulin (E7) and anti-lamin (ADL67.10) antibodies (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) for control of cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, rat anti-Corto antibodies [26], monoclonal phosphoserine/threonine/tyrosine antibody (MA1-38450, Pierce), rabbit anti-ERK antibodies (C-16, Santa-Cruz Biotechnology) or monoclonal anti-dP-ERK E10 antibody (9106, Cell Signaling). Anti-HA antibody (H3663, Sigma) was used as a negative control in immunoprecipitation experiments.

Protein-protein interactions

In vitro transcription-translation and GST pull-down assays were performed as previously described [26] using GST-Corto fusion proteins [61] and GST-dMP1 fusion protein [3].

For co-immunoprecipitation experiments, 500 μg of protein extracts (total, cytoplasmic or nuclear) were immunoprecipitated either with monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody, anti-Myc 9E10 antibody or anti-HA antibody using magnetic protein G-agarose beads (Ademtech). To co-immunoprecipitate Corto and dMP1, proteins were cross-linked before extraction by treating cells with 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes followed by neutralization with 0.13 M glycine. To co-immunoprecipitate Corto and dP-ERK in embryonic extracts, monoclonal anti-dP-ERK E10 antibody was covalently bound onto protein G-agarose beads using standard protocols.

Two-hybrid experiments were performed as previously described [26], using leucine and X-Gal tests. Both tests gave the same result, and only the leucine test is shown. The full length dMP1 protein was fused with the B42 activation domain (B42AD). The NH2-terminal half of Corto was fused with the LexA DNA binding domain. B42AD and LexA were used as negative controls. B42/SV40 large T-antigen (B42ADT) and LexA/p53 (LexA53) fusion proteins were used as positive controls.

Immunolocalization on polytene chromosomes

Co-immunostaining of w1118 polytene chromosomes was performed as previously described [26] using rabbit anti-ERK (1:20) (C-16; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology), guinea-pig anti-dMP1 (1:20) [3] and rabbit anti-Corto (1:20) [26] as primary antibodies. Secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor® 594 goat anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor® 488 goat anti-guinea-pig IgG, Molecular Probes) were used at a 1:1000 dilution.

References

  1. 1.

    Raman M, Chen W, Cobb MH: Differential regulation and properties of MAPKs. Oncogene. 2007, 26 (22): 3100-3112. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210392.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Schaeffer HJ, Catling AD, Eblen ST, Collier LS, Krauss A, Weber MJ: MP1: a MEK binding partner that enhances enzymatic activation of the MAP kinase cascade. Science (New York, NY). 1998, 281 (5383): 1668-1671. 10.1126/science.281.5383.1668.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mouchel-Vielh E, Bloyer S, Salvaing J, Randsholt NB, Peronnet F: Involvement of the MP1 scaffold protein in ERK signaling regulation during Drosophila wing development. Genes Cells. 2008, 13 (11): 1099-1111.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yang SH, Sharrocks AD, Whitmarsh AJ: Transcriptional regulation by the MAP kinase signaling cascades. Gene. 2003, 320: 3-21. 10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00816-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Simone C, Forcales SV, Hill DA, Imbalzano AN, Latella L, Puri PL: p38 pathway targets SWI-SNF chromatin-remodeling complex to muscle-specific loci. Nature genetics. 2004, 36 (7): 738-743. 10.1038/ng1378.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lawrence MC, McGlynn K, Shao C, Duan L, Naziruddin B, Levy MF, Cobb MH: Chromatin-bound mitogen-activated protein kinases transmit dynamic signals in transcription complexes in beta-cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008, 105 (36): 13315-13320. 10.1073/pnas.0806465105.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Alepuz PM, Jovanovic A, Reiser V, Ammerer G: Stress-induced map kinase Hog1 is part of transcription activation complexes. Molecular cell. 2001, 7 (4): 767-777. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00221-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Alepuz PM, de Nadal E, Zapater M, Ammerer G, Posas F: Osmostress-induced transcription by Hot1 depends on a Hog1-mediated recruitment of the RNA Pol II. The EMBO journal. 2003, 22 (10): 2433-2442. 10.1093/emboj/cdg243.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Proft M, Mas G, de Nadal E, Vendrell A, Noriega N, Struhl K, Posas F: The stress-activated Hog1 kinase is a selective transcriptional elongation factor for genes responding to osmotic stress. Molecular cell. 2006, 23 (2): 241-250. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.031.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pokholok DK, Zeitlinger J, Hannett NM, Reynolds DB, Young RA: Activated signal transduction kinases frequently occupy target genes. Science (New York, NY). 2006, 313 (5786): 533-536. 10.1126/science.1127677.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    De Nadal E, Zapater M, Alepuz PM, Sumoy L, Mas G, Posas F: The MAPK Hog1 recruits Rpd3 histone deacetylase to activate osmoresponsive genes. Nature. 2004, 427 (6972): 370-374. 10.1038/nature02258.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zapater M, Sohrmann M, Peter M, Posas F, de Nadal E: Selective requirement for SAGA in Hog1-mediated gene expression depending on the severity of the external osmostress conditions. Molecular and cellular biology. 2007, 27 (11): 3900-3910. 10.1128/MCB.00089-07.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mas G, de Nadal E, Dechant R, Rodriguez de la Concepcion ML, Logie C, Jimeno-Gonzalez S, Chavez S, Ammerer G, Posas F: Recruitment of a chromatin remodelling complex by the Hog1 MAP kinase to stress genes. The EMBO journal. 2009, 28 (4): 326-336. 10.1038/emboj.2008.299.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rampalli S, Li L, Mak E, Ge K, Brand M, Tapscott SJ, Dilworth FJ: p38 MAPK signaling regulates recruitment of Ash2L-containing methyltransferase complexes to specific genes during differentiation. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2007, 14 (12): 1150-1156.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Voncken JW, Niessen H, Neufeld B, Rennefahrt U, Dahlmans V, Kubben N, Holzer B, Ludwig S, Rapp UR: MAPKAP kinase 3pK phosphorylates and regulates chromatin association of the polycomb group protein Bmi1. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2005, 280 (7): 5178-5187. 10.1074/jbc.M407155200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Beck S, Faradji F, Brock H, Peronnet F: Maintenance of Hox gene expression patterns. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2010, 689: 41-62. full_text.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Grimaud C, Negre N, Cavalli G: From genetics to epigenetics: the tale of Polycomb group and trithorax group genes. Chromosome Res. 2006, 14 (4): 363-375. 10.1007/s10577-006-1069-y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gildea JJ, Lopez R, Shearn A: A screen for new trithorax group genes identified little imaginal discs, the Drosophila melanogaster homologue of human retinoblastoma binding protein 2. Genetics. 2000, 156 (2): 645-663.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Milne TA, Sinclair DA, Brock HW: The Additional sex combs gene of Drosophila is required for activation and repression of homeotic loci, and interacts specifically with Polycomb and super sex combs. Mol Gen Genet. 1999, 261 (4-5): 753-761. 10.1007/s004380050018.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Farkas G, Gausz J, Galloni M, Reuter G, Gyurkovics H, Karch F: The Trithorax-like gene encodes the Drosophila GAGA factor. Nature. 1994, 371 (6500): 806-808. 10.1038/371806a0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Poux S, Melfi R, Pirrotta V: Establishment of Polycomb silencing requires a transient interaction between PC and ESC. Genes & development. 2001, 15 (19): 2509-2514.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Decoville M, Giacomello E, Leng M, Locker D: DSP1, an HMG-like protein, is involved in the regulation of homeotic genes. Genetics. 2001, 157 (1): 237-244.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dejardin J, Rappailles A, Cuvier O, Grimaud C, Decoville M, Locker D, Cavalli G: Recruitment of Drosophila Polycomb group proteins to chromatin by DSP1. Nature. 2005, 434 (7032): 533-538. 10.1038/nature03386.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kodjabachian L, Delaage M, Maurel C, Miassod R, Jacq B, Rosset R: Mutations in ccf, a novel Drosophila gene encoding a chromosomal factor, affect progression through mitosis and interact with Pc-G mutations. The EMBO journal. 1998, 17 (4): 1063-1075. 10.1093/emboj/17.4.1063.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lopez A, Higuet D, Rosset R, Deutsch J, Peronnet F: corto genetically interacts with Pc-G and trx-G genes and maintains the anterior boundary of Ultrabithorax expression in Drosophila larvae. Mol Genet Genomics. 2001, 266 (4): 572-583. 10.1007/s004380100572.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Salvaing J, Lopez A, Boivin A, Deutsch JS, Peronnet F: The Drosophila Corto protein interacts with Polycomb-group proteins and the GAGA factor. Nucleic acids research. 2003, 31 (11): 2873-2882. 10.1093/nar/gkg381.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Salvaing J, Decoville M, Mouchel-Vielh E, Bussiere M, Daulny A, Boldyreva L, Zhimulev I, Locker D, Peronnet F: Corto and DSP1 interact and bind to a maintenance element of the Scr Hox gene: understanding the role of Enhancers of trithorax and Polycomb. BMC biology. 2006, 4: 9-10.1186/1741-7007-4-9.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Brunner D, Oellers N, Szabad J, Biggs WH, Zipursky SL, Hafen E: A gain-of-function mutation in Drosophila MAP kinase activates multiple receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathways. Cell. 1994, 76 (5): 875-888. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90362-X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Blair SS: Wing vein patterning in Drosophila and the analysis of intercellular signaling. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 2007, 23: 293-319. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123606.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bier E: Drawing lines in the Drosophila wing: initiation of wing vein development. Current opinion in genetics & development. 2000, 10 (4): 393-398.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Martin-Blanco E, Roch F, Noll E, Baonza A, Duffy JB, Perrimon N: A temporal switch in DER signaling controls the specification and differentiation of veins and interveins in the Drosophila wing. Development (Cambridge, England). 1999, 126 (24): 5739-5747.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sturtevant MA, Roark M, Bier E: The Drosophila rhomboid gene mediates the localized formation of wing veins and interacts genetically with components of the EGF-R signaling pathway. Genes & development. 1993, 7 (6): 961-973.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lee JR, Urban S, Garvey CF, Freeman M: Regulated intracellular ligand transport and proteolysis control EGF signal activation in Drosophila. Cell. 2001, 107 (2): 161-171. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00526-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Urban S, Lee JR, Freeman M: Drosophila rhomboid-1 defines a family of putative intramembrane serine proteases. Cell. 2001, 107 (2): 173-182. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00525-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Fristrom D, Gotwals P, Eaton S, Kornberg TB, Sturtevant M, Bier E, Fristrom JW: Blistered: a gene required for vein/intervein formation in wings of Drosophila. Development (Cambridge, England). 1994, 120 (9): 2661-2671.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Montagne J, Groppe J, Guillemin K, Krasnow MA, Gehring WJ, Affolter M: The Drosophila Serum Response Factor gene is required for the formation of intervein tissue of the wing and is allelic to blistered. Development (Cambridge, England). 1996, 122 (9): 2589-2597.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Smulders-Srinivasan TK, Szakmary A, Lin H: A Drosophila chromatin factor interacts with the Piwi-interacting RNA mechanism in niche cells to regulate germline stem cell self-renewal. Genetics. 186 (2): 573-583. 10.1534/genetics.110.119081.

  38. 38.

    Marenda DR, Zraly CB, Dingwall AK: The Drosophila Brahma (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex exhibits cell-type specific activation and repression functions. Developmental biology. 2004, 267 (2): 279-293. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.10.040.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cacace AM, Michaud NR, Therrien M, Mathes K, Copeland T, Rubin GM, Morrison DK: Identification of constitutive and ras-inducible phosphorylation sites of KSR: implications for 14-3-3 binding, mitogen-activated protein kinase binding, and KSR overexpression. Molecular and cellular biology. 1999, 19 (1): 229-240.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Marenda DR, Zraly CB, Feng Y, Egan S, Dingwall AK: The Drosophila SNR1 (SNF5/INI1) subunit directs essential developmental functions of the Brahma chromatin remodeling complex. Molecular and cellular biology. 2003, 23 (1): 289-305. 10.1128/MCB.23.1.289-305.2003.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Elfring LK, Daniel C, Papoulas O, Deuring R, Sarte M, Moseley S, Beek SJ, Waldrip WR, Daubresse G, DePace A, et al: Genetic analysis of brahma: the Drosophila homolog of the yeast chromatin remodeling factor SWI2/SNF2. Genetics. 1998, 148 (1): 251-265.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Collins RT, Furukawa T, Tanese N, Treisman JE: Osa associates with the Brahma chromatin remodeling complex and promotes the activation of some target genes. The EMBO journal. 1999, 18 (24): 7029-7040. 10.1093/emboj/18.24.7029.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Terriente-Felix A, de Celis JF: Osa, a subunit of the BAP chromatin-remodelling complex, participates in the regulation of gene expression in response to EGFR signalling in the Drosophila wing. Developmental biology. 2009, 329 (2): 350-361. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.03.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lim YM, Nishizawa K, Nishi Y, Tsuda L, Inoue YH, Nishida Y: Genetic analysis of rolled, which encodes a Drosophila mitogen-activated protein kinase. Genetics. 1999, 153 (2): 763-771.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Brehm A, Tufteland KR, Aasland R, Becker PB: The many colours of chromodomains. Bioessays. 2004, 26 (2): 133-140. 10.1002/bies.10392.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Feng XH, Derynck R: Mammalian two-hybrid assays. Analyzing protein-protein interactions in transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathway. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, NJ). 2001, 177: 221-239.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Wunderlich W, Fialka I, Teis D, Alpi A, Pfeifer A, Parton RG, Lottspeich F, Huber LA: A novel 14-kilodalton protein interacts with the mitogen-activated protein kinase scaffold mp1 on a late endosomal/lysosomal compartment. The Journal of cell biology. 2001, 152 (4): 765-776. 10.1083/jcb.152.4.765.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Teis D, Wunderlich W, Huber LA: Localization of the MP1-MAPK scaffold complex to endosomes is mediated by p14 and required for signal transduction. Developmental cell. 2002, 3 (6): 803-814. 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00364-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Noguchi K, Shiurba R, Higashinakagawa T: Nuclear translocation of mouse polycomb m33 protein in regenerating liver. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2002, 291 (3): 508-515. 10.1006/bbrc.2002.6480.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Prober DA, Edgar BA: Ras1 promotes cellular growth in the Drosophila wing. Cell. 2000, 100 (4): 435-446. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80679-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Schwartz D, Gygi SP: An iterative statistical approach to the identification of protein phosphorylation motifs from large-scale data sets. Nature biotechnology. 2005, 23 (11): 1391-1398. 10.1038/nbt1146.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kang J, Shi Y, Xiang B, Qu B, Su W, Zhu M, Zhang M, Bao G, Wang F, Zhang X, et al: A nuclear function of beta-arrestin1 in GPCR signaling: regulation of histone acetylation and gene transcription. Cell. 2005, 123 (5): 833-847. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Casar B, Pinto A, Crespo P: Essential role of ERK dimers in the activation of cytoplasmic but not nuclear substrates by ERK-scaffold complexes. Molecular cell. 2008, 31 (5): 708-721. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.024.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kumar JP, Moses K: EGF receptor and Notch signaling act upstream of Eyeless/Pax6 to control eye specification. Cell. 2001, 104 (5): 687-697. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00265-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Campbell S, Inamdar M, Rodrigues V, Raghavan V, Palazzolo M, Chovnick A: The scalloped gene encodes a novel, evolutionarily conserved transcription factor required for sensory organ differentiation in Drosophila. Genes & development. 1992, 6 (3): 367-379.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Milan M, Diaz-Benjumea FJ, Cohen SM: Beadex encodes an LMO protein that regulates Apterous LIM-homeodomain activity in Drosophila wing development: a model for LMO oncogene function. Genes & development. 1998, 12 (18): 2912-2920.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Masucci JD, Miltenberger RJ, Hoffmann FM: Pattern-specific expression of the Drosophila decapentaplegic gene in imaginal disks is regulated by 3' cis-regulatory elements. Genes & development. 1990, 4 (11): 2011-2023.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Roy F, Laberge G, Douziech M, Ferland-McCollough D, Therrien M: KSR is a scaffold required for activation of the ERK/MAPK module. Genes & development. 2002, 16 (4): 427-438.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Andrews NC, Faller DV: A rapid micropreparation technique for extraction of DNA-binding proteins from limiting numbers of mammalian cells. Nucleic acids research. 1991, 19 (9): 2499.-10.1093/nar/19.9.2499.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Anderson CW, Baum PR, Gesteland RF: Processing of adenovirus 2-induced proteins. Journal of virology. 1973, 12 (2): 241-252.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Salvaing J, Nagel AC, Mouchel-Vielh E, Bloyer S, Maier D, Preiss A, Peronnet F: The enhancer of trithorax and polycomb corto interacts with cyclin G in Drosophila. PloS one. 2008, 3 (2): e1658.-10.1371/journal.pone.0001658.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Emadali A, Metrakos PP, Kalantari F, Boutros T, Boismenu D, Chevet E: Proteomic analysis of tyrosine phosphorylation during human liver transplantation. Proteome science. 2007, 5: 1-10.1186/1477-5956-5-1.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Anja Nagel for the gift of the pMT-RasV12 plasmid, the Murphy lab for Drosophila Gateway vectors, Dr. Kevin Moses, Dr. Roland Rosset and the Bloomington Stock Center for flies, the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for antibodies. We thank Valérie Ribeiro and Sarah Leridée for excellent technical assistance. Q-RT PCR experiments were performed at the IFR83 (UPMC). We thank Dr. Neel Randsholt, Dr. Willem Voncken, Dr. Sébastien Bloyer and Pr. Jean Deutsch for their comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by CNRS and UPMC, and by a scholarship from the Ministère de la Recherche to J.R.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; UMR7622, Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement, Equipe Chromatine et Développement, 75005, Paris, France

    Emmanuèle Mouchel-Vielh, Julien Rougeot & Frédérique Peronnet

  2. Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire, CNRS UPR 4301, conventionnée avec l'Université d'Orléans, 45071, Orléans, France

    Martine Decoville

Authors
  1. Emmanuèle Mouchel-Vielh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julien Rougeot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martine Decoville
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frédérique Peronnet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuèle Mouchel-Vielh.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

EM-V. conceived and performed all the genetics experiments and most of the biochemical experiments. JR and MD participated in biochemical experiments. JR performed quantitative PCR experiments. FP performed in situ hybridization experiments and polytene chromosome immunostainings. EM-V and FP wrote the paper. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mouchel-Vielh, E., Rougeot, J., Decoville, M. et al. The MAP kinase ERK and its scaffold protein MP1 interact with the chromatin regulator Corto during Drosophilawing tissue development. BMC Dev Biol 11, 17 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-11-17

Download citation

Keywords

  • Extracellular Regulate Kinase Signaling
  • Polytene Chromosome
  • Extracellular Regulate Kinase
  • Gal4 Driver
  • Extracellular Regulate Kinase Signaling Pathway

BMC Developmental Biology

ISSN: 1471-213X

Contact us