Skip to main content

Age- and calorie-independent life span extension from dietary restriction by bacterial deprivation in Caenorhabditis elegans



Dietary restriction (DR) increases life span and delays age-associated disease in many organisms. The mechanism by which DR enhances longevity is not well understood.


Using bacterial food deprivation as a means of DR in C. elegans, we show that transient DR confers long-term benefits including stress resistance and increased longevity. Consistent with studies in the fruit fly and in mice, we demonstrate that DR also enhances survival when initiated late in life. DR by bacterial food deprivation significantly increases life span in worms when initiated as late as 24 days of adulthood, an age at which greater than 50% of the cohort have died. These survival benefits are, at least partially, independent of food consumption, as control fed animals are no longer consuming bacterial food at this advanced age. Animals separated from the bacterial lawn by a barrier of solid agar have a life span intermediate between control fed and food restricted animals. Thus, we find that life span extension from bacterial deprivation can be partially suppressed by a diffusible component of the bacterial food source, suggesting a calorie-independent mechanism for life span extension by dietary restriction.


Based on these findings, we propose that dietary restriction by bacterial deprivation increases longevity in C. elegans by a combination of reduced food consumption and decreased food sensing.


Dietary restriction (DR), also referred to as calorie restriction, is an intervention that extends life span and delays the onset of age-related phenotypes in nearly all eukaryotic organisms in which it has been tested [1]. Simplistically, it is defined as a significant reduction in dietary intake in the absence of malnutrition. Many different approaches can be used to achieve DR. In mice and rats for example, life span extension is observed by either reducing the amount of food consumed daily (compared to an ad libitum control group) or by imposing an intermittent fasting regimen [2, 3].

In addition to simply reducing the amount of food intake, the effects of altering dietary composition has also been examined in different organisms. Methionine-restricted mice [4] and rats [5] have an extended life span, suggesting that the nutritional composition of the diet can influence longevity in mammals. In fruit flies, reducing either the yeast extract or sugar composition of the food supply extends life span, although yeast extract appears to have the greatest impact on longevity [6]. Restriction of amino acids also increases life span in flies [7]. In yeast, reducing either the amount of glucose or amino acids in the growth media increases replicative life span [810].

Multiple methods for DR have been used in C. elegans, as in other model organisms [11]. One commonly used method in C. elegans is a genetic model, mutation of eat-2. The eat mutants were originally identified in a screen for defects in feeding behavior – they have reduced food consumption due to pharyngeal pumping defects [12, 13]. Several alleles of eat-2 (and other eat mutants) increase life span, with longevity generally correlating with the degree to which pumping rate is decreased [14]. Life span extension from mutation of eat-2 is independent of the FOXO-family transcription factor DAF-16 and is additive with a longevity-enhancing allele of the insulin/IGF-1-like receptor daf-2 [14]. This has led to the generally accepted model that DR acts to modulate longevity in a genetic pathway distinct from insulin/IGF-1-like signaling (IIS) [15, 16]. As with any genetic model of DR, however, eat mutants are not suitable for certain studies. The relative activity associated with different eat-2 alleles has not been completely characterized, so it is unclear whether life span extension from DR is maximized in studies using these alleles. In addition, eat mutants are food restricted from hatching, and DR during development may have secondary effects on adult physiology that are not fully understood.

DR by reducing food availability also increases life span in C. elegans. The standard method for culturing C. elegans in the laboratory is to maintain the nematodes on the surface of nematode growth medium (NGM) nutrient agar with E. coli OP50 as the food source. DR on NGM nutrient agar has been achieved by reducing the amount of peptone in the media so as to limit bacterial growth [17] or by reducing the amount of live bacteria present on the surface of the NGM nutrient agar [18]. Two methods of DR have also been described using non-standard, liquid-based growth conditions: bacterial dilution in S basal medium and axenic growth [1923]. Both liquid-based methods increase life span relative to animals fed a diet of E. coli OP50 in S basal, and axenic growth behaves similarly to mutation of eat-2 in epistasis experiments with IIS [24]. Nonetheless, neither method is widely used for aging studies. This may be due to the potential differences in growth under standard conditions on an agar surface versus growth in liquid culture. Axenic growth is reported to cause delayed development and poor growth [22, 25], and feeding animals E. coli in S basal shortens life span relative to growth on NGM agar [19]. In addition, DR during development has been shown to be sub-optimal, since animals switched to DR just before adulthood are longer-lived than those maintained on DR from hatching [26].

Recently, two groups independently reported an novel reduced bacterial feeding DR protocol carried out under standard conditions [27, 28]. By measuring adult life span as a function of E. coli food concentration, both studies determined that complete removal of bacterial food early in adulthood (BD, bacterial food deprivation; also referred to as dietary restriction through food deprivation or dietary deprivation) optimally increases median and maximum life span. BD differs from previous studies describing DR by axenic growth in the culture method (solid versus liquid media) and the time of initiation (reproductively mature adults versus hatchlings)[27]. Although bacterial food is completely absent during adulthood in the BD regimen, BD-treated animals do not suffer from malnutrition (as evidenced by their increased life span and stress resistance [27, 28]), thus meeting the commonly accepted definition for DR. Life span extension from BD has been recently validated in multiple wild-derived C. elegans strains, as well as in a second closely related nematode species C. remanei [29].

Like mutation of eat-2 or axenic growth [14, 24], BD appears to modulate longevity by a mechanism distinct from reduced IIS [27, 28]. While BD results in a more robust life span increase than mutation of eat-2, eat-2 mutants subjected to BD are not longer-lived than wild type animals on BD [27, 28]. Taken together, these observations indicate that BD and mutation of eat-2 are likely to increase life span by similar or overlapping mechanisms. Thus, BD represents a simple plate-based method for DR that maximizes longevity from food restriction under standard nematode growth conditions and does not require additional genetic manipulation.

In order to better characterize the mechanism by which BD slows aging in C. elegans, we determined the effect of BD on survival as a function of the age at which BD is initiated. Previously, our group and an independent study [27, 28] reported that BD increases life span in C. elegans when initiated at the last stage of larval development (L4) through day 11 of adulthood. Here, we expand this analysis to more advanced ages, after which mortality has become significant in the population. Similar to prior observations in Drosophila [30] and in mice [31], we find that BD enhances survival even when imposed late in life. Transient exposure to BD confers a life span benefit that correlates with stress resistance, as measured by thermotolerance. We further demonstrate that age-independent life span extension in response to BD is not solely due to reduced caloric intake, but is also influenced by a diffusible, cell-free component of the bacterial diet.

Results and Discussion

To determine the relationship between BD and age, animals were switched from control fed to BD diets, or vice versa, at different ages, and survival was monitored. A significant increase in survival was observed when animals were transferred to BD at day 4, 8, 14, 20, or 24 of adulthood (Figure 1A, Table 1). This was true even when BD was initiated after more than 50% of the control-fed population had died. Animals placed on BD at the 2nd day of adulthood and returned to a control-fed diet at the 8th, 14th, or 28th day of adulthood lived longer than animals fed a control diet for their entire life (Figure 1B, Table 2). By considering the survival of only those animals alive at the time of return to control fed conditions, it was apparent that transient BD induced a significant long-term protective effect resulting in enhanced survival after return to a control fed diet (Figure 1C). This is demonstrated by the significant increase in survival following return to a control fed diet, relative to animals maintained on a control fed diet for life.

Table 1 BD increases life span independent of the age at which it is initiated.
Table 2 Transient BD has long-term survival benefits.
Figure 1

Dietary restriction by bacterial food deprivation (BD) extends life span independent of age or duration. (A) BD increases survival when initiated at 4 (red line, square symbols), 8 (blue line, circles), 14 (green line, triangles), 20 (gray line, plus symbols), or 24 (purple line, astericks) days of adulthood, relative to control fed (CF) animals. Mean life spans ± standard error, statistical significance, and number of animals examined provided in Table 1. (B) Animals subjected to transient BD, from the day 2 of adulthood to day 8 (blue line, square symbols), 14 (purple line, triangles), or 28 (green line, circles) have increased survival relative to animals maintained on CF until death (black line, diamonds). Mean life spans ± standard error, statistical significance, and number of animals examined provided in Table 2. (C) Mean survival of animals in (B) alive when BD-treated animals were transferred back to control fed conditions shows a significant increase in survival of animals exposed to transient BD relative to animals maintained on a control fed diet for life.

We have previously reported that BD induces a robust increase in thermotolerance [27]. We wanted to determine whether worms exposed to transient BD retain this stress resistant phenotype, in correlation with the life span benefit. We observed an age-dependent decrease in thermotolerance of both control fed and BD animals; however, BD significantly increased thermotolerance at every age-point examined (Figure 2A; day 7, p = 4.3 × 10-16; day 18, p = 3.9 × 10-7; day 22, p = 1.7 × 10-7), consistent with prior observations [28]. Interestingly, enhanced thermotolerance was also maintained in animals subjected to transient BD (four days on BD then returned to the control diet for four days) (Figure 2B; p = 0.02), demonstrating that transient BD provides a long-term enhancement of thermotolerance as well as survival.

Figure 2

Increased thermotolerance from BD is independent of age and maintained upon return to a control diet. (A) BD increases survival at 38°C, relative to control fed (CF) animals at 7, 18, or 22 days of age. Error bars are standard error of the mean. (B) Thermotolerance (survival at 38°C) is significantly increased at the 12th day of adulthood relative to CF animals, regardless of whether BD is initiated at the 4th (BD4–12) or 8th (BD8–12) day of adulthood. Transient BD from the 4th to the 8th day of adulthood (BD4–8) also results in enhanced thermotolerance relative to CF animals.

During our analysis of BD and the age at which it is initiated, we noted that older control fed animals qualitatively consumed less food than young animals, based on the rate at which bacterial food disappeared from the surface of the agar plates. This is consistent with prior reports that the rate of pharyngeal pumping, which is necessary for food to enter the intestine, decreases dramatically with age [20, 32, 33]. In a longitudinal study of age-related phenotypes, it was shown that no significant pumping can be measured in the last quartile of the mean life span [32]. This suggested to us the possibility that BD might increase life span when initiated in animals that were no longer consuming a substantial amount of bacterial food.

To assay feeding behavior as a function of age, we quantified both food consumption and defecation. Food consumption was measured by mixing fluorescent beads comparable in size to bacterial cells with the E. coli food source and observing the presence of food within the gut by fluorescence microscopy. Within one hour of exposure, beads were observed in the intestine of 100% of young adult control-fed animals (Figure 3A). The percent of control-fed animals that are consuming beads decreased dramatically with age, however, and by 24 days of age, beads could not detected in the gut lumen of any animals assayed (Figure 3B). Defecation rate also decreased as a function of age and defecation cycles were not observed in control-fed animals older than 24 days (Figure 3C). Thus, as suggested by prior reports measuring pharyngeal pumping [20, 32, 33], we conclude that consumption of bacterial cells by the control fed population decreases over the first 2–3 weeks of life and largely ceases by 20–24 days of adulthood.

Figure 3

Bacterial food consumption decreases with age. (A) Fluorescent beads similar in size to bacterial cells are eaten and can be visualized in the intestines of young (day 4 adult) animals (Vis = visible light). (B) The percent of animals consuming a detectable quantity of fluorescent beads decreases with age in control fed (CF) animals. (C) The rate of defecation (average number of defecation cycles per animal in 10 minutes of observation) decreases with age.

Since BD extends life span in animals no longer consuming bacteria (see Figure 1, control fed animals transferred to BD at day 24 of adulthood), we considered the possibility that the bacterial food source produces a longevity-limiting signal that is sensed by the worms. Prior studies demonstrated that some sensory-defective C. elegans mutants have increased life span [3436]. The possibility that dietary cues directly mediate longevity was not examined in these studies, however, and based on physiological assays it was concluded that the long-lived chemosensory mutants were not mimics of DR [35]. Consistent with this conclusion and a recent study using a liquid bacterial dilution DR protocol [37], we observed that BD significantly increased the life span of five long-lived chemosensory mutants examined by Kenyon and colleagues [35]: che-3(p801), che-11(e1810), daf-10(e1387), osm-3(p802), and tax-4(p678) (Figure 4A–E). Three of these mutants (daf-10(e1387), osm-3(p802), and tax-4(p678)) were previously demonstrated to be at least partially dependent on daf-16 [35]; whereas life span extension by BD is daf-16 independent [27, 28]. BD significantly extends life span in each of these chemosensory mutants compared to control fed animals (Figure 4, Tables 3 and 4). Since the magnitude by which BD increased life span in long-lived chemosensory mutants was comparable to the percent life span increase in N2 animals, we suggest that life span extension from BD is likely to be mediated by a food sensing pathway that is at least partially distinct from the chemosensory mutants examined here.

Table 3 Life span extension by BD is additive with known chemosensory pathways.
Table 4 Statistical analysis of BD and chemosensory mutant epistasis experiments.
Figure 4

BD increases life span of select chemosensory mutants. BD significantly extends the life span of long-lived chemosensory mutants, including (A) che-3(p801) (3 independent trials) (B) che-11(e1810) (two trials), (C) daf-10 (e1387) (2 trials), (D) osm-3(p802) (2 trials), and (E) tax-4(p678) (3 trials), compared to control fed (CF) animals. Number of animals examined, mean life spans ± standard error, median life span, and statistical significance are provided in Table 3. Extended statistical analysis (pair-wise comparisons) for each experimental group is provided in Table 4.

To test the hypothesis that decreased sensing of a dietary component underlies a portion of the life span extension from BD, we asked whether cell-free supernatant from an overnight culture of E. coli OP50 would influence longevity. Addition of E. coli OP50 conditioned supernatant significantly decreased the life span of BD animals (Figure 5A, Table 5). This suppression of BD-induced longevity was not observed when fresh culture media was added to the diet, demonstrating that bacterial metabolism is required for production of the longevity-limiting signal.

Table 5 A soluble bacterial product limits life span extension by BD.
Figure 5

A diffusible bacterial product suppresses life span extension by bacterial deprivation (BD) in C. elegans. (A) Animals cultured on plates treated with cell-free supernatant from an overnight culture of E. coli OP50 (BD + sup) had decreased survival compared to animals maintained on untreated BD plates or BD plates treated with uninoculated LB (BD + LB). The life span of the treated group was still longer than that of control fed (CF) animals. (B) An alternate experimental strategy to exposing animals on BD to bacterial products in the absence of food consumption is to use agar barrier plates, in which a bacterial lawn is separated from the worms by a layer of agar (see Methods for a detailed description). (C) Animals cultured on agar barrier plates had decreased survival compared to animals maintained on BD plates with no bacteria present. Number of animals examined, mean life spans ± standard error, median life span, and statistical significance are provided in Table 5A. Extended statistical analysis (pair-wise comparisons) is provided in Table 5B.

As a further test of our hypothesis, we determined the longevity of animals that were physically separated from the bacterial food by an agar barrier (Figure 5B). Animals were grown on NGM + OP50 until the 2nd day of adulthood, then transferred to the surface of either control fed, BD, or agar barrier plates. Similar to the effect of adding E. coli OP50 conditioned supernatant to the diet, animals maintained on agar barrier plates had a life span that was intermediate between control fed and BD (Figure 5C, Table 5). Thus, we conclude that a diffusible component of the bacterial diet limits longevity, and the absence of this dietary signal accounts for a portion of the life span extension associated with BD.


The health and longevity benefits of DR initiated early in life are well established in a variety of organisms [3]. Studies in flies and rodents have indicated that at least some of these benefits can still be attained if DR is initiated during middle age [30, 31]. Our work further supports this idea by demonstrating that BD significantly increases survival in C. elegans at any point during adulthood, at least up to the median population life span. Importantly, transient BD early in life results in a long-term protective effect, increasing both survival and stress resistance even after return to a control diet. Finally, we report the surprising observation that BD increases survival by a mechanism that is at least partially distinct from reduced food consumption, and involves reduced sensing of a diffusible signal produced by the bacterial component of the diet. Based on these observations, we propose that DR increases life span through two distinct mechanisms: calorie restriction and reduced food sensing (Figure 6).

Figure 6

Bacterial deprivation (BD) extends life span through reduced food consumption and reduced food sensing. Animals subjected to BD experience calorie restriction through reduced food consumption, similar to genetic models of DR such as mutation of eat-2. BD animals are also deprived of a longevity-limiting dietary cue(s) produced by the bacterial food source. Genetic epistasis analysis indicates that BD acts in parallel to long-lived chemosensory mutants (yellow box) that influence life span primarily by altering insulin/IGF-1-like signaling (IIS). Thus, we propose that life span extension from BD is a combination of the effects of calorie restriction and reduced food sensing.

The idea that dietary cues could influence nematode longevity via sensory signaling is supported by prior observations. C. elegans is attracted to both soluble and volatile compounds produced by the bacterial food source, and animals can sense and respond to food through chemotaxis [38]. Although muscle tissue undergoes age-related deterioration, the nervous system remains remarkably intact in worms of advanced age, [39]. This is consistent with our model that BD extends life span in worms of advanced age, not because of reduced food consumption, but because of the loss of a life span-limiting signal produced by the bacteria and sensed by the worms. In addition, several mutants defective in chemosensation are long-lived. The additive life span extension from combining long-lived chemosensory mutants with BD is consistent with our model, as these mutants were previously shown not to be genetic mimics of DR [35]. Indeed, since life span extension in chemosensory mutants is largely dependent on daf-16 [35], and multiple epistasis studies have placed DR and daf-16 in different genetic pathways, an additive life span extension is the predicted outcome of these experiments.

How can a sensory mechanism of longevity determination by BD be reconciled with other models of DR in C. elegans? Mutation of eat-2 causes a pharyngeal pumping defect that results in reduced food consumption [12, 13], but has not been shown to cause sensory defects. Thus, the life span extension from mutation of eat-2 is likely due to a reduction in caloric intake. Interestingly, BD increases life span to a greater extent than mutation of eat-2, and eat-2 mutants subjected to BD are not longer-lived than N2 animals subjected to BD [27, 28]. One interpretation of these data is that reduced food intake (e.g. in the eat-2 mutant) is sufficient to increase life span, while reduced food intake coupled with reduced food sensing (e.g. in the case of BD) leads to an even greater life span extension. Axenic culture is somewhat more complicated because, although the animals are maintained in the absence of food, as they are in BD, the growth media is very nutrient rich (compared to NGM) and contains additional signals that may be sensed by C. elegans. eat-2 mutants subjected to axenic culture live longer than N2 animals on axenic growth [23], suggesting that mutation of eat-2 and axenic growth are not equivalent methods of DR.

Previous studies have demonstrated a role for the bacterial food source in life span determination – through bacterial pathogenesis. A number of bacterial strains have been shown to be pathogenic in C. elegans [40], and worms cultured on a non-pathogenic species, B. subtilis, were shown to have extended longevity compared to those cultured on the normal food source, E. coli OP50 [41]. OP50 has also been shown to affect life span through bacterial proliferation in the gut [42]. In our studies, we maintain worms on UV-irradiated OP50 as a food source to eliminate bacterial pathogenesis as a complicating factor in life span analysis. However, we do find that a soluble product made by OP50 partially suppresses the life span extension by BD, independent of bacterial proliferation, supporting our model that reduced food sensing contributes to the longevity observed in animals subjected to BD. Formally, it is possible that the bacteria produce a toxin that is life span-limiting, independent of the pathogenic effects of bacterial proliferation in the gut. This does not change the interpretation of our data, however, which is that a diffusible, cell-free component of the diet can limit the life span extension from BD.

Recent studies in the fruit fly have indicated that a volatile component of the diet can also suppress life span extension from DR in that organism [43]. Thus, modulation of longevity through food sensing may represent an evolutionarily conserved mechanism linking diet and aging. It will be of interest to determine which are the precise chemical cues in the diet that influence longevity in each of these organisms. At this time, there is little direct evidence that food sensing modulates aging in mammals; however, it is reasonable to speculate that food could induce relevant physiological changes through olfactory or taste cues, independent of food consumption. This raises the intriguing possibility that one class of DR mimetics may be achieved by interfering with food sensing, but without requiring reduced caloric intake.


Worm Strains and Maintenance

C. elegans were propagated at 20°C on NGM seeded with E. coli OP50 in 5 cm Petri dishes. Unless otherwise stated, E. coli OP50 cultures used for seeding plates were inoculated from a single bacterial colony in Luria broth (LB) and allowed to grow overnight at 37°C, then concentrated 5-fold before seeding on NGM plates containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin. The bacterial food source for all experiments was UV-killed after seeding in a Stratalinker (9999 J/m2), with UV-killing verified by failure to form colonies upon streaking to LB plates. Plates lacking food were similarly treated with ampicillin and UV.

Life span assays

Life span assays were initiated by allowing young adult hermaphrodites to lay eggs for 4–6 hours on NGM containing ampicillin, seeded with UV-killed OP50. At L4, animals were transferred to fresh NGM + UV-killed OP50 supplemented with ampicillin and 50 μM 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) to prevent progeny from hatching. Unless otherwise stated, at the 4th day of adulthood animals were transferred to experimental media: either NGM + UV-killed OP50 + ampicillin/FUDR (control-fed media) or NGM + ampicillin/FUDR (BD media). In some experiments, tetracycline was added topically to plates to eliminate contaminants. Fed animals were transferred to fresh plates every three days for the first two weeks of each life span experiment and then as necessary to prevent depletion of the food source. The viability of each animal was determined every 2–3 days by assaying for movement in response to agitation of the plate or gentle probing with a platinum wire. Animals that crawled off the NGM agar surface and failed to return were excluded from subsequent analyses. All of the experiments shown were repeated at least 3 times, with similar results.

For experiments testing the effect of soluble bacterial products on life span, plates were prepared that had a bacterial lawn beneath the agar surface. E. coli OP50 was seeded on a thin NGM agar pad (5 ml) before adding a second layer of NGM agar (5 ml). Total volume of NGM agar was the same for experimental and control groups (10 ml). Control plates with food on the surface and control BD plates were made in the same way, without a bacterial lawn in between agar layers. In experiments testing cell-free supernatant from E. coli OP50 culture, plates were prepared by adding 100 μl of filter-sterilized cell-free supernatant (the same volume used for seeding control-fed plates).

Thermotolerance Assays

Animals were maintained at 20°C until beginning the thermotolerance assay. Response to heat stress was assayed by measuring viability over time at 38°C. Viability was determined by removing one plate at a time (~20 animals per plate) from the incubator and assaying for movement in response to gentle prodding. Each experiment included a minimum of two plates per condition and we performed three independent trials.

Defecation Assays

For defecation assays, single animals were transferred to fresh NGM plates seeded with UV-killed OP50 + ampicillin/FUDR and allowed to recover from transfer for one hour prior to the assay. Individual animals were observed under a dissecting microscope for a ten-minute period and each posterior body contraction and expulsion were recorded. Completed defecation cycles were scored when both a posterior body contraction and expulsion were observed.

Feeding Assays

Consumption of fluorescent beads was measured as previously described [44]. Briefly, NGM plates seeded with UV-killed OP50 + ampicillin/FUDR were treated with 100 μl of fluorescent beads diluted 1:20 in M9 buffer and allowed to dry. Fluorescent beads used in these assays were Fluoresbrite polychromatic red microspheres (0.5 μm) from Polysciences, Inc. For each age and condition assayed, ten animals were transferred to plates treated with beads and allowed to feed for an hour. Animals were then briefly transferred to plates without beads to remove excess beads from the cuticle and then transferred to Teflon-coated slides in M9 buffer with 25 mM sodium azide for microscopy. Animals with detectable beads in the gut lumen (by fluorescent microscopy) were scored as positives. Images were generated with a Canon Powershot S31S digital camera connected to the eyepiece of a Zeiss SteREO Lumar.V12 microscope.

Statistical analysis

A Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was used (MATLAB 'ranksum' function) to determine whether median survival differed between groups in all life span and thermotolerance experiments. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  1. 1.

    Masoro EJ: Overview of caloric restriction and ageing. Mech Ageing Dev. 2005, 126 (9): 913-922. 10.1016/j.mad.2005.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Martin B, Mattson MP, Maudsley S: Caloric restriction and intermittent fasting: two potential diets for successful brain aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2006, 5 (3): 332-353. 10.1016/j.arr.2006.04.002.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Weindruch RH, Walford RL: The Retardation of Aging and Disease by Dietary Restriction. 1988, Springfield, IL. , Thomas

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Miller RA, Buehner G, Chang Y, Harper JM, Sigler R, Smith-Wheelock M: Methionine-deficient diet extends mouse lifespan, slows immune and lens aging, alters glucose, T4, IGF-I and insulin levels, and increases hepatocyte MIF levels and stress resistance. Aging Cell. 2005, 4 (3): 119-125. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2005.00152.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Orentreich N, Matias JR, DeFelice A, Zimmerman JA: Low methionine ingestion by rats extends life span. J Nutr. 1993, 123 (2): 269-274.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mair W, Piper MD, Partridge L: Calories do not explain extension of life span by dietary restriction in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3 (7): e223-10.1371/journal.pbio.0030223.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Min KJ, Tatar M: Restriction of amino acids extends lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster. Mech Ageing Dev. 2006, 127 (7): 643-646. 10.1016/j.mad.2006.02.005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jiang JC, Jaruga E, Repnevskaya MV, Jazwinski SM: An intervention resembling caloric restriction prolongs life span and retards aging in yeast. Faseb J. 2000, 14 (14): 2135-2137.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kaeberlein M, Kirkland KT, Fields S, Kennedy BK: Sir2-independent life span extension by calorie restriction in yeast. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2 (9): E296-10.1371/journal.pbio.0020296.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lin SJ, Defossez PA, Guarente L: Requirement of NAD and SIR2 for life-span extension by calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 2000, 289 (5487): 2126-2128. 10.1126/science.289.5487.2126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Houthoofd K, Vanfleteren JR: Public and private mechanisms of life extension in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Genet Genomics. 2007, 277 (6): 601-617. 10.1007/s00438-007-0225-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Avery L: The genetics of feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1993, 133 (4): 897-917.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Raizen DM, Lee RY, Avery L: Interacting genes required for pharyngeal excitation by motor neuron MC in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1995, 141 (4): 1365-1382.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lakowski B, Hekimi S: The genetics of caloric restriction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95 (22): 13091-13096. 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13091.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Houthoofd K, Braeckman BP, Lenaerts I, Brys K, Matthijssens F, De Vreese A, Van Eygen S, Vanfleteren JR: DAF-2 pathway mutations and food restriction in aging Caenorhabditis elegans differentially affect metabolism. Neurobiol Aging. 2005, 26 (5): 689-696. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.06.011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Walker G, Houthoofd K, Vanfleteren JR, Gems D: Dietary restriction in C. elegans: from rate-of-living effects to nutrient sensing pathways. Mech Ageing Dev. 2005, epub ahead of print

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hosono R, Nishimoto S, Kuno S: Alterations of life span in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans under monoxenic culture conditions. Exp Gerontol. 1989, 24 (3): 251-264. 10.1016/0531-5565(89)90016-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Greer EL, Dowlatshahi D, Banko MR, Villen J, Hoang K, Blanchard D, Gygi SP, Brunet A: An AMPK-FOXO pathway mediates longevity induced by a novel method of dietary restriction in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 2007, 17 (19): 1646-1656. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.047.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Klass MR: Aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: major biological and environmental factors influencing life span. Mech Ageing Dev. 1977, 6 (6): 413-429. 10.1016/0047-6374(77)90043-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Croll NA, Smith JM, Zuckerman BM: The aging process of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans in bacterial and axenic culture. Exp Aging Res. 1977, 3 (3): 175-189. 10.1080/03610737708257101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Vanfleteren JR: Axenic culture of free-living, plant-parasitic, and insect-parasitic nematodes. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 1978, 16: 131-157. 10.1146/

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Johnson TE, Mitchell DH, Kline S, Kemal R, Foy J: Arresting development arrests aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Mech Ageing Dev. 1984, 28 (1): 23-40. 10.1016/0047-6374(84)90150-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Houthoofd K, Braeckman BP, Lenaerts I, Brys K, De Vreese A, Van Eygen S, Vanfleteren JR: Axenic growth up-regulates mass-specific metabolic rate, stress resistance, and extends life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp Gerontol. 2002, 37 (12): 1371-1378. 10.1016/S0531-5565(02)00173-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Houthoofd K, Braeckman BP, Johnson TE, Vanfleteren JR: Life extension via dietary restriction is independent of the Ins/IGF-1 signalling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp Gerontol. 2003, 38 (9): 947-954. 10.1016/S0531-5565(03)00161-X.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Vanfleteren JR, Braeckman BP: Mechanisms of life span determination in Caenorhabditis elegans. Neurobiol Aging. 1999, 20 (5): 487-502. 10.1016/S0197-4580(99)00087-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lenaerts I, van Eygen S, van Fleteren J: Adult-limited dietary restriction slows gompertzian aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007, 1100: 442-448. 10.1196/annals.1395.049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kaeberlein TL, Smith ED, Tsuchiya M, Welton KL, Thomas JH, Fields S, Kennedy BK, Kaeberlein M: Lifespan extension in Caenorhabditis elegans by complete removal of food. Aging Cell. 2006, 5 (6): 487–494-10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00238.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lee GD, Wilson MA, Zhu M, Wolkow CA, de Cabo R, Ingram DK, Zou S: Dietary deprivation extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell. 2006, 5 (6): 515-524. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00241.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sutphin GL, Kaeberlein M: Dietary restriction by bacterial deprivation increases life span in wild-derived nematodes. Exp Gerontol. 2007

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mair W, Goymer P, Pletcher SD, Partridge L: Demography of dietary restriction and death in Drosophila. Science. 2003, 301 (5640): 1731-1733. 10.1126/science.1086016.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Dhahbi JM, Kim HJ, Mote PL, Beaver RJ, Spindler SR: Temporal linkage between the phenotypic and genomic responses to caloric restriction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101 (15): 5524-5529. 10.1073/pnas.0305300101.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Huang C, Xiong C, Kornfeld K: Measurements of age-related changes of physiological processes that predict lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101 (21): 8084-8089. 10.1073/pnas.0400848101.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kenyon C, Chang J, Gensch E, Rudner A, Tabtiang R: A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature. 1993, 366 (6454): 461-464. 10.1038/366461a0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Alcedo J, Kenyon C: Regulation of C. elegans longevity by specific gustatory and olfactory neurons. Neuron. 2004, 41 (1): 45-55. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00816-X.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Apfeld J, Kenyon C: Regulation of lifespan by sensory perception in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1999, 402 (6763): 804-809. 10.1038/45544.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lans H, Jansen G: Multiple sensory G proteins in the olfactory, gustatory and nociceptive neurons modulate longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 2007, 303 (2): 474-482. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.11.028.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bishop NA, Guarente L: Two neurons mediate diet-restriction-induced longevity in C. elegans. Nature. 2007, 447 (7144): 545-549. 10.1038/nature05904.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bargmann CI: Chemosensation in C. elegans. WormBook. Edited by: WormBook . 2006, The C. elegans Research Community

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Herndon LA, Schmeissner PJ, Dudaronek JM, Brown PA, Listner KM, Sakano Y, Paupard MC, Hall DH, Driscoll M: Stochastic and genetic factors influence tissue-specific decline in ageing C. elegans. Nature. 2002, 419 (6909): 808-814. 10.1038/nature01135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sifri CD, Begun J, Ausubel FM: The worm has turned--microbial virulence modeled in Caenorhabditis elegans. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13 (3): 119-127. 10.1016/j.tim.2005.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Garsin DA, Villanueva JM, Begun J, Kim DH, Sifri CD, Calderwood SB, Ruvkun G, Ausubel FM: Long-lived C. elegans daf-2 mutants are resistant to bacterial pathogens. Science. 2003, 300 (5627): 1921-10.1126/science.1080147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Garigan D, Hsu AL, Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Ahringer J, Kenyon C: Genetic analysis of tissue aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: a role for heat-shock factor and bacterial proliferation. Genetics. 2002, 161 (3): 1101-1112.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Libert S, Zwiener J, Chu X, Vanvoorhies W, Roman G, Pletcher SD: Regulation of Drosophila life span by olfaction and food-derived odors. Science. 2007, 315 (5815): 1133-1137. 10.1126/science.1136610.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ohmachi M, Sugimoto A, Iino Y, Yamamoto M: kel-1, a novel Kelch-related gene in Caenorhabditis elegans, is expressed in pharyngeal gland cells and is required for the feeding process. Genes Cells. 1999, 4 (6): 325-337. 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1999.00264.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank J. Thomas for providing strains and for helpful discussion, and K. Steinkraus and L. Shamieh for critical reading of the manuscript. Some strains used in this work were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the NIH National Center for Research Resources. This work was conducted while MK was an AFAR Research Grant recipient and was also supported by a Glenn/AFAR Breakthroughs in Gerontology Award to MK and by a grant from The Ellison Medical Foundation to MK and BKK. EDS was supported by National Institutes of Health Training Grant P30 AG013280.

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Erica D Smith or Matt Kaeberlein.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

EDS participated in the conception and design of the study, coordinated the data acquisition and analysis, and drafted the manuscript. TLK participated in the conception and design of the study, data acquisition and analysis. BTL contributed to experimental design, data acquisition, and data analysis of feeding and defecation assays. JS contributed to experimental design, data acquisition, and data analysis of thermotolerance assays. KLW contributed to experimental design, data acquisition, and data analysis of life span experiments. BKK participated in the conception and design of the study, and drafted the manuscript. MKK conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, E.D., Kaeberlein, T.L., Lydum, B.T. et al. Age- and calorie-independent life span extension from dietary restriction by bacterial deprivation in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Dev Biol 8, 49 (2008).

Download citation


  • Life Span
  • Dietary Restriction
  • Life Span Extension
  • Increase Life Span
  • Nematode Growth Medium