Skip to content


You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Developmental Biology

Open Access

The RGS gene loco is essential for male reproductive system differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster

  • Leeanne McGurk1,
  • Stephen Pathirana2,
  • Kathleen Rothwell3,
  • Thorsten Trimbuch4,
  • Paolo Colombini5,
  • Fengwei Yu6,
  • William Chia6 and
  • Mary Bownes3Email author
BMC Developmental Biology20088:37

Received: 25 June 2007

Accepted: 03 April 2008

Published: 03 April 2008



The loco gene encodes several different isoforms of a regulator of G-protein signalling. These different isoforms of LOCO are part of a pathway enabling cells to respond to external signals. LOCO is known to be required at various developmental stages including neuroblast division, glial cell formation and oogenesis. Less is known about LOCO and its involvement in male development therefore to gain further insight into the role of LOCO in development we carried out a genetic screen and analysed males with reduced fertility.


We identified a number of lethal loco mutants and four semi-lethal lines, which generate males with reduced fertility. We have identified a fifth loco transcript and show that it is differentially expressed in developing pupae. We have characterised the expression pattern of all loco transcripts during pupal development in the adult testes, both in wild type and loco mutant strains. In addition we also show that there are various G-protein α subunits expressed in the testis all of which may be potential binding partners of LOCO.


We propose that the male sterility in the new loco mutants result from a failure of accurate morphogenesis of the adult reproductive system during metamorphosis, we propose that this is due to a loss of expression of loco c3. Thus, we conclude that specific isoforms of loco are required for the differentiation of the male gonad and genital disc.


Many hormones and neurotransmitters act by binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) which transduce the signal via second messengers such as cAMP. The heterotrimeric G proteins comprise of one member from each of the Gα, Gβ and Gγ families. In the absence of an external signal the GPCRs are associated with an inactive heterotrimer complex, Gα-GDP/Gβ/Gγ. When a specific ligand binds a GPCR, the intrinsic nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity is activated; the resultant Gα-GTP subunit dissociates from Gβ/Gγ, leaving the Gβ/Gγ heterodimer and the Gα-GTP to spread the signal to downstream target molecules. The GTP is slowly hydrolysed by Gα, and the Gα-GDP then returns and binds to the Gβ/Gγ complex rendering the receptor inactive. RGS proteins (Regulator of G-protein signalling) are a family of GTPase activating proteins (GAP) that trigger the intrinsic GTPase activity of the Gα subunits [1, 2]. Although a great deal is known about the regulation of G-protein-coupled receptor signalling in a variety of organisms [3, 4] less is known in Drosophila and more importantly the involvement of G-protein-coupled receptor signalling in developmental decisions.

In Drosophila nine genes encoding for RGS proteins have been identified [5], however protein function has only been studied in three of them, axin, gprk2 and loco. Daxin, the Drosophila orthologue of axin [6], is a scaffold protein, that in the absence of Wnt signaling, negatively regulates cytosolic Armadillo by aiding its proteosome-dependent degradation [79]. The negative regulation of Armidillo by axin is inhibited by the interaction of Axin with the Gαs subunit of Prostaglandin E2-stimulated in colon cancer cells [10]. Gprk2, G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2, maintains cAMP levels in the ovary and is required for embryonic anterior patterning [11, 12]. The Drosophila loco gene encodes a number of LOCO protein isoforms, all of which contain the RGS domain and also a GoLoco motif that acts as a Guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI), (Figure 1A). Previous studies suggest that LOCO might play an important role during early Drosophila development. For example during asymmetric cell division of the Drosophila neuroblast, LOCO may act as a GTPase activating protein of the Gαi protein via its RGS domain as well as a (GDI) through its GoLoco motif [13]. In the Drosophila embryo loco is essential for the formation, extension, and migration of glial cells, and plays a role in asymmetric cell division of Drosophila neuroblasts [13, 14]. Rare adult flies lacking the loco c1 and loco c2 transcripts have locomotive defects [14]. Previously, we showed that loco is expressed in the nurse cells and in specific subsets of the follicle cells of the Drosophila egg chamber, and that it is required for cytoplasmic dumping during oogenesis and for dorsal-ventral axis formation of the egg chamber and embryo [15].
Figure 1

The loco gene and its effect on male fertility. A: The loco gene is comprised of nine exons. The final three exons, exon 2, 3 and 4 are common to all loco transcripts whereas the 5'exons are alternatively spliced to give rise to five different loco transcripts; loco c1 (AF130745), loco c2 (AF130744), loco c3, (AF245455), loco c4 (CG5248 PC) and loco c5 (AI944917). The exon numbers are shown below the genomic sequence and the conserved domains of the LOCO protein and the primers used to identify the transcripts in the testis and pupae are marked above the appropriate exons. Black regions indicate coding sequence, white regions represent untranslated regions. The P element in the original P insertion line, c139, is 322 bp upstream of exon 2. The loco 318 mutant contains two P elements (or one P element and a partial P element) in reverse orientation 322 bp upstream of exon 2. The P elements of loco 318 are flanked by a 9 bp duplication of genomic sequence. B: The sequence surrounding the P element insertion site in c139 was sequenced in loco 358 and loco 387 and aligned to the genomic DNA using ClustalW [36] and BoxShade [37]. No deletion was observed. The region of genomic DNA that is duplicated in loco 318 is highlighted in red. C: Hemizygous flies, containing the loco mutation and the deficiency chromosome (Df(3R)15CE1 (Df15), Df(3R)17D1 (Df17), or loco Δ13 ) or the wild-type, OrR, chromosome, were crossed with OrR, Df15, Df17 or loco Δ13 virgin females. The ratio between the total number of eggs laid and the number of eggs which hatched is represented as a percentage. Chi squared values were calculated by comparing the heterozygous male semi-steriles to OrR and the hemizygous mutants to the heterozygous deficiency lines. Chi squared values over 6.64 suggest that the reduction in fertility is due to the two lines being closely linked. Asterisks indicate a statistically significant reduction.

The Drosophila loco gene encodes a number of isoforms of an RGS protein (Figure 1A). loco c1 and loco c2 were the first transcripts to be identified and were found to be differentially expressed during embryogenesis [14], subsequently we identified a third transcript, loco c3, and showed that it was required for egg and embryo development [15]. The sequence data on loco c3 has been extended to show that more sequence, including a start site, was upstream of the original start site identified for loco c3. The two start sites are in frame, but neither has been shown to be functionally active [13]. To remain in line with the published nomenclature, we will call this extended transcript loco c4.

Until now nothing was known about the involvement of RGS in G protein signalling in the male reproductive system, we therefore set out to determine if LOCO was also essential for male development. We isolated male fertility mutants from a P element mobilisation screen [15] and have shown that the male sterility is due to mutations mapping in the loco gene. Gene expression analysis has not only identified disrupted gene expression in the loco mutant lines but it has also revealed a fourth loco transcript required for correct male development. This alongside the phenotypic analysis of the semi-sterile males suggests a role for loco in the differentiation of the testis from the male gonads and genital discs. Furthermore we analyse loco expression in male gonads and the male adult reproductive tissue in both wild-type and loco mutant lines.

Finally, RGS proteins, such as LOCO, negatively regulate signalling mediated by G-protein coupled receptors, by reducing the time that the Gβ/Gγ subunit is available to signal. However with an additional GoLoco motif, LOCO can also increase the initiation rate of G protein signalling [13]. LOCO may well regulate this signalling pathway in the follicle cells of the Drosophila egg and glial cells of the embryo by binding to the Drosophila Gαi subunit [14, 16, 17]. In order to analyse the presence of Gα-proteins, which could potentially interact with LOCO in the Drosophila testis, we undertook a candidate PCR approach and identified a further two Gα subunits expressed in the testis.


Screens for male sterility

Previously we carried out a P element mediated mutagenesis screen using a P element located between exons II-1 and I-1 of the loco gene (Figure 1A) [15]. We established that perfect excision of this element led to fully viable fertile lines, indicating that there were no other mutations in the stock. Most of the 399 lines that we generated were homozygous lethal and many of the viable lines produced very few homozygous adults, indicating a requirement for loco during development. Many of the lines, which generated some adults, also showed reduced fertility in females. Complementation analysis of the 399 lines showed that the mutants fell into two different complementation groups, however, two mutant lines fell into both complementation groups. The complex splicing of loco transcripts makes it likely that both of the complementation groups affect different essential transcripts of the loco gene.

In this study we wanted to determine if any of the semi-lethal lines which generated some adult progeny were male sterile. We found that 27 of the loco mutant lines generated a few adult males. The fertility of the rare adult males was investigated by crossing the homozygous loco mutant males to OrR virgin-females. Five lines produced none or very rare progeny; loco 318 , loco 358 , loco 455 , loco 370 , and loco 387 . The first three of these are red-eyed lines, which have either resulted from a partial excision or from a mobilised P element. The latter two lines are white eyed and therefore lack at least part of the original P insertion and possibly some flanking genomic DNA. One of these lines (loco 455 ) subsequently ceased producing any adult males and was not further investigated. Complementation analysis showed that the mutations of the semi-sterile males fell into the same complementation group (Table 1). The rare heteroallelic males produced in these experiments generated very few progeny when crossed to OrR females (this includes line loco 455 ).
Table 1

Complementation tests for male fertility


Average number of progeny produced per cross

loco 358 /loco 318


loco 387 /loco 318


loco 387 /loco 358


loco 370 /loco 358


loco 370 /loco 318


loco T1 /loco 318


loco Δ113 /loco 387


loco Δ113 /loco 358


loco Δ113 /loco 318


Flies heterozygous for each of the male semi-sterile lines and one of the Df lines that affects loco (loco Δ13 ) were crossed and rare heteroallelic mutant males were collected. Groups of 2–3 males crossed with 3–4 OrR females would normally generate several hundred progeny if the males are also OrR. Each experiment was repeated twice. No adult males were obtained for loco 455 .

None of the loco mutants heterozygous with OrR showed significantly reduced male fertility, indicating that the semi-sterile loco mutant males were fully recessive (Table 2). To further characterise the loco mutants we analysed male fertility in two other strains lacking loco. The two deficiency strains used were Df(3R)15CE1 (Df15), which lacks the cytogenetic region 93F-;94C-94D, and Df(3R)17D1 (Df17), which lacks 93E-94C, both lack the loco gene which is at position 94B6-94B8. The deficiency lines were crossed to OrR and the resulting heterozygous males were crossed to OrR to assess the effect of the mutation on fertility (Table 2). Only Df15/+ showed a significant reduction in fertility when compared to OrR, this is likely to be due to the loss of genes present in the region 94C-D as Df17/+, when crossed to OrR, did not show any significant reduction in male fertility (Table 2). Furthermore loco Δ113 , a mutant strain, which was previously reported to lack part of the loco gene and 7 kb of downstream sequence [14] also showed no significant reduction in fertility when crossed to OrR (Table 2). This suggests that heterozygous loss of loco does not affect male fertility.
Table 2

Complementation of male semi-sterile lines with deficiency lines


Total Eggs

Total Larvae

% viability







loco 318 /OrR




0.32 NS

loco 358 /OrR




0.33 NS

loco 370 /OrR




0.22 NS

loco 387 /OrR




0.51 NS





45.25 S





3.46 NS

OrR/loco Δ13




0.49 NS

loco 318 /Df15




5.86 NS

loco 318 /Df17




17.67 S

loco 318 /loco Δ13




24.70 S

loco 358 /Df15




0.31 NS

loco 358 /Df17




0.39 NS

loco 358 /loco Δ13




9.94 S

loco 370 /Df15




6.90 S

loco 370 /Df17




1.98 NS

loco 370 /loco Δ13




14.23 S

loco 387 /Df15




22.06 S

loco 387 /Df17




6.75 S

loco 387 /loco Δ13




35.65 S

Heterozygous flies, containing the loco mutation and the deficiency chromosome (Df(3R)15CE1, Df(3R)17D1, loco Δ13 ) or the OrR, chromosome, were crossed with OrR. The ratio of eggs laid and eggs hatched is represented as a percentage. Significance was calculated by calculating Chi2 values between heterozygous mutant males and OrR, and the hemizygous mutants to the heterozygous deficiency lines. Chi2 > 6.64 suggests the two lines are closely linked. S: significant, NS: not significant.

In order to assess whether our loco mutants were in the same or different complementation groups to the deficiency lines [14], the four loco mutant lines were crossed to each of the above mentioned deficiency lines. All heteroallelic mutants had reduced fertility when compared to the heterozygous mutants (Figure 1C). Despite all of the heteroallelic loco mutants showing reduced fertility not all were a statistically significant reduction (Table 2). However all of the mutant loco alleles (loco 318 , loco 358 , loco 370 , and loco 387 ) hemizygous with the loco Δ113 allele, showed a statistically significant reduction in male fertility (Table 2 and Figure 1C). This not only suggests that the mutations isolated here fall into the same complementation group but, that the mutations we have isolated reside within the loco gene.

Expression of locoin the testis

The semi-sterile males obtained from the loco mutants isolated in this screen suggested that LOCO may have a role within the testes. To investigate whether loco was expressed in the male gonads a UAS-lacZ reporter strain was crossed to the original P insertion strain (c139), which contained a GAL4 insertion in the loco gene [15]. The resulting male adult gonads were stained for β-galactosidase activity. The testis and seminal vesicles showed very strong lacZ expression (Figure 2A). The loco gene is alternatively spliced to give rise to several isoforms loco c1, loco c2, loco c3, and loco c4 [1315]. Upon database searching we revealed that there was a fifth transcript, isolated from an adult EST testis library (Accession Number AI944917). The sequence had no conserved domains relating to LOCO and mapped to the genomic region located in the intron between exon II-1 and exon I-1 (Figure 1A). This suggested that there was an additional transcript, not previously described, but expressed in the testis. This new exon has been labelled exon IV-1 and the transcript produced is loco c5 (Figure 1A).
Figure 2

Expression of loco in the male gonads. A: A UAS-lacZ reporter line revealed that loco was strongly expressed in the adult testes (T) and seminal vesicles (white arrows). B: The β-galactosidase reporter revealed that loco was expressed in the male gonad (black arrow) and in the surrounding fat body tissue. C: The primers shown in Figure 1A were used to establish that loco c1, loco c2, loco c3 and loco c5 were expressed in OrR testes. The band marked with an asterisk is the true PCR product of the 3' end of loco c2 (3'c2) as determined by sequence analysis. D: Several G-protein transcripts were detected in OrR testis. The asterisk indicates the true PCR product of expressed Gα73B as determined by sequence analysis. R: RNA, G: genomic DNA.

In order to analyse the expression of the various loco splice variants in the Drosophila testis primers were designed to specifically amplify loco c1, loco c2, loco c3 and loco c5. It should be noted that the primers used to amplify loco c3 could not discriminate between loco c3 and loco c4, furthermore it is possible that these two transcripts form the same transcriptional unit. RT-PCR revealed that loco c1, loco c2, loco c3, and loco c5 were expressed in the OrR male testis (Figure 2C). Detection of loco c2 using the primer pair FP1 and RP8 (Figure 1A) produced a specific product at approximately 1 kb and two non-specific bands at lower molecular weights (Figure 2C, 3'c2). Cloning and sequencing revealed that the 1 kb band was specific to loco c2, the 0.9 kb band aligned to CaBP1 (CG5809) and the 0.4 kb band aligned to myosin binding subunit (CG32156). We also show later in the paper that the novel transcript identified from the testis EST library is not unique to the testis, as it is also expressed in pupae. Thus what we have identified and described is a further novel loco transcript which is expressed during development.

G-protein α subunits are also expressed in the adult reproductive system

LOCO is a regulator of G-protein signalling and has been shown to interact with various Gα subunits [14, 17]. Searching the Drosophila genome and various EST databases we found several Gα transcripts and proteins. We wanted to investigate if different Gα subunits were expressed in the testis providing potential binding partners for the isoforms of LOCO that are generated. The three Gα genes we choose to analyse were G-oα47A, Gα73B, and Gα49B.

G-oα47A the Drosophila homologue of the mammalian Goα, is needed for embryonic development [1820] and has more recently been shown to contribute to asymmetric cell division [21]. Furthermore it is expressed in the nurse cells and oocyte and is present in various adult nerve cells [22]. Gα73B encodes a further Gα subunit called Gfα, it is expressed in the embryonic midgut and in the nurse cells after which it is transported to the oocyte [23]. Gα49B, a Gq subunit involved in phospholipase C activation, is involved in the Drosophila visual system [24, 25]. Gα49B is known to be expressed in the adult testis [26], and thus acted as a positive control. PCR showed that G-oα47A, Gα73B and Gα49B were expressed in the testis (Figure 2D). This raises the possibility that in the adult testis there are additional Gα subunits that may interact with LOCO.

Analysis of mutant phenotypes

We have shown that loco and various Gα subunits are expressed in the testis and have identified, genetically, that mutation in loco can lead to significantly reduced fertility in males. We therefore went on and analysed adult gonad morphology in the loco mutants. All of the loco mutants had abnormal reproductive systems and showed a variety of defects (Figure 3B–E). The phenotype was almost 100% penetrant, there was a range in severity within the same line, and only the very occasional male reproductive system was normal. Often the accessory glands were abnormal and the ejaculatory ducts appeared swollen. Neither testes from virgin wild-type males or aged wild-type males show this peculiar phenotype, suggesting that this phenotype was not attributable to the mating status (data not shown). There were no obvious differences between the mutant lines, which may be attributable to all mutants being in the same complementation group. The testes, even those very abnormal in shape and size, contained mobile sperm (Figure 3F). This suggested that the differentiation of the sperm does not require the loco isoform affected in this group of mutants, but possibly differentiation and morphogenesis of the derivatives of the genital discs and gonad are altered and often fails in these mutants. Identification of motile sperm in the male mutants may explain why some offspring were produced; it seems likely that the abnormal morphology of the gonads is the causative effect of reduced fertility.
Figure 3

The adult reproductive tissue from the loco mutants. A: Adult reproductive system of OrR Drosophila melanogaster. B: The testes of the mutant loco 318 . The testes in this fly seem much smaller and thinner than OrR. C: The male reproductive tissue of loco 358 . The accessory glands are small and differ in size; furthermore, the anterior ejaculatory duct appeared swollen. D: The male reproductive tissue of the loco 358 mutant heterozygous with OrR. Both testes have formed and the accessory glands seem fuller than the homozygous mutant. The anterior duct seems less swollen and the posterior end looks fuller. The morphology is still very unlike wild-type testes however these flies are fertile. E: The male reproductive tissue of loco 387 . The testes remain unwound and are much smaller than the accessory glands. The accessory glands are not as full as OrR. F: The male reproductive tissue of loco 387 is flattened and ruptured and spermatid bundles are observed. T: Testis, AG: accessory gland, AD: anterior ejaculatory duct and S: sperm.

Expression of locoduring male development

The phenotypes of the mutant testes and reproductive system suggested that organogenesis and not necessarily spermatogenesis was abnormal. Since differentiation of the testis and reproductive system occurs during metamorphosis we investigated the expression of loco in early and late pupae (Figure 4A and 4B). We divided the pupae into early pupae and late pupae and performed RT-PCR on the various loco transcripts (Figure 1A). The loco c1, loco c2, and loco c3 transcripts were expressed during the early stages and late stages of pupal development. The newly identified transcript, loco c5, was found to be differentially expressed and seemed to be detectable only in early staged pupae (Figure 4A and 4B).
Figure 4

Identification of the various loco transcripts in pupae and testes. A: Transcripts loco c1, loco c2, loco c3, and loco c5 were detected in early pupae. B: The transcripts loco c1, loco c2, and loco c3 were detected in late staged pupae, however loco c5 was not. C: Expression of loco c1 was detected in loco 318 as was the 5' end of loco c2. However the 3'end of loco c2 (3' c2) was not detected in loco 318 as only the non-specific band was produced (Sequencing and alignment showed this band to be CaBP1). Expression of loco c3 was also absent in loco 318 , however expression of loco c5 remained unaffected. D: Only expression of loco c3 was lost in the pupae of the mutant line loco 358 . E: All loco transcripts were detected in the pupae of the mutant line loco 387 . F: Expression of loco c3 was lost in the testes of the mutant line loco 358 . The true PCR product of loco c2 is marked with an asterisk.

We have now shown that loco is expressed during metamorphosis. In order to ascertain whether loco is expressed during organogenesis of the male gonad, the original P element insertion line, which contains GAL4 in the loco gene [15], was crossed to a UAS-lacZ reporter strain. β-galactosidase activity was detected in the larval male gonads (Figure 2B, arrow) as well as in the fat body tissue surrounding the gonad. The observed β-galactosidase activity in the gonad confirms that expression of the loco gene takes place in the male gonad during development.

Expression of locoin mutant pupae and testes

We have demonstrated that loco is expressed in the developing male and adult gonads, furthermore we have shown that loss of loco expression resulted in reduced fertility and testis with abnormal morphology. In order to ascertain which transcript was affected by the mutation we performed RT-PCR for loco c1, loco c2, loco c3 and loco c5 in the mutant pupae of three of the male semi-sterile lines, loco 318 , loco 358 , and loco 387 (Figure 4C–E). We detected loco c1, the 5'end of loco c2 and the loco c5 transcripts in the loco 318 mutant. However loco 318 completely lacked expression of the loco c3 transcript (Figure 4C). Furthermore loco 318 only expressed the 5'end of loco c2. The 3'end of loco c2 was not detected (Figure 4C, 3'c2) as only the 0.9 kb non-specific band was detected. Pupal expression from the loco gene in the loco 358 mutant produced loco c1, loco c2 and loco c5, however like loco 318 the loco 358 mutant lacked loco c3 (Figure 4D). Pupal expression of loco c1, loco c2, loco c3 and loco c5 was detected in the loco 387 mutant (Figure 4E). The testis expression of loco 358 was also found to lack any detectable loco c3 transcript.

The RT-PCR analysis was carried out on multiple different RNA samples and the same result was consistently achieved. Whenever the quality of the RNA was checked on a formaldehyde agarose gel it was found to be intact (data not shown). Furthermore detection of loco c1, loco c2 and loco c5 from the same cDNA samples which lacked loco c3 suggests that the RNA transcribed from the loco gene was intact. Taken together this data suggests that there is a requirement for loco c3 in adult reproductive tissue.

Analysis of the genomic sequence in the mutant lines

To gain further insight into molecular nature of the loco mutations, PCR was performed on genomic DNA isolated from the original c139 strain [15]. PCR utilising a P element primer directed to the 5' end of the P element (pgawb5a inv) in combination with a gene specific primer revealed that the P element was in reverse orientation to the loco gene (the 5' end of the P element was orientated toward the 3'end of the loco gene). Sequencing of the PCR product revealed that the P element had inserted 322 bp upstream of exon I-1 (Figure 1A).

PCR analysis of the loco 318 mutant revealed that the P element primer directed to the 5' end of the P element (pgawb5a inv) worked in combination with gene specific primers in the forward and reverse orientation. This suggested that there was more than one P element present in loco 318 and that they were in the opposite orientation to one another. Direct sequencing of these products revealed that one P element was present at the original position (322 bp upstream of exon I-1) and the second P element was present at the same position but in the opposite direction (Figure 1A). The sequencing of the PCR products from loco 318 also revealed a 9 bp duplication of genomic DNA on either side of the P elements (Figure 1A). It is possible that two P elements 322 bp upstream of exon 2 alters pre-mRNA length such that there is premature dissociation of RNA polymerase II (RNAPol II), hindrance of the folding of the pre-mRNA molecule which prevents the joining of the splice sites, or it may disrupt important splice factor binding sites.

The P element primer used to reveal the position of the P element in the mutant line loco 318 failed to produce PCR products in the mutant line loco 358 . PCR across the original insertion site revealed that the P element had excised and had not deleted any genomic sequence (Figure 1B). The mutant line loco 358 expresses white, it lacks expression of loco c3 (Figure 4D) and the mutation genetically maps to the loco gene (Table 2). This suggested that a partial P element, which lacks the P element primer site, was present in the loco gene. PCR with the P element primer and FP8 produced a fragment of 2 kb, suggesting that the P element was 2 kb upstream of exon 2. Genomic PCR was performed across all introns in the loco gene. PCR failed only between exon I-1 and exon 2, whereas a PCR product across this region in wild-type genomic DNA was detected (data not shown). This further suggested that the partial P element in the mutant line loco 358 was located between exon I-1 and exon 2 and thus produced a PCR product too long to be detected by the PCR programme.

Direct sequencing of the insertion site in loco 387 revealed that no sequence had been deleted (Figure 1B). The loco 387 line was found to express loco c1, loco c2, loco c3, and loco c5 (Figure 4E). The reduction in male sterility when loco 387 is hemizygous with Df15, Df17 or loco Δ13 was statistically significant (Table 2) and the adult reproductive tissue of loco 387 is morphologically abnormal (Figure 3E). This suggests that a mutation resides within the loco gene. Large rearrangements can occur during P element mobilisation. The PCR product across the loco insertion site was approximately 500 bp, therefore if a large inversion or rearrangement had occurred in loco 387 it would not be detected by this simple PCR. These data alongside the genetic data strongly suggests that the mutations lie within the loco gene.


We isolated a number of homozygous lethal mutant lines of loco. These lines die at a variety of developmental stages, however, among them four lines were able to generate some homozygous adult males, which were semi-sterile. We suggest that this is most likely to be due to a failure of the correct morphogenesis of the testis and reproductive organ derivatives of the larval gonad. This adds another role to the wide range of developmental decisions that are known to be dependent upon loco. Granderath et al., (1999) [14] showed that loco mutants died as embryos showing abnormalities in the contacts between glial cells [14]. Our previous studies illustrated that there is a requirement for loco in cytoplasmic dumping from the nurse cells to the oocyte and that loco is required for correct patterning of the eggshell and embryo [15]. There is also a large maternal supply of loco in the embryo probably explaining why the embryos die so late in embryogenesis. Finally, it was shown more recently that loco contributes to asymmetric cell division of neuroblasts [13]. These findings suggest that G-protein signalling may be important at wide variety of developmental stages in Drosophila.

The loco gene expresses several splice variants loco c1, loco c2, loco c3, and loco c4 [1315]. Here we describe the expression of a fifth transcript, loco c5. We have analysed the expression of loco c1, loco c2, loco c3, and loco c5 in the wild-type testis and developing pupae and show that there is developmental regulation of loco c5 expression during morphogenesis. In addition we show that several G proteins are expressed in the male gonads and are therefore potential binding partners for the various LOCO isoforms. It is possible that the protein isoforms, expressing different conserved domains, will have different binding specificities and preferences for different G-proteins [2731]. The G protein Gαi (G-oα65A) binds to loco c2 [14] and it is also co-expressed with loco in a variety of cell types [16, 32]. We have shown by PCR that other Gα subunits are expressed (Goα47A, Gα49B, and Gα73B) in the testis and thus there is potential for LOCO to interact with other Gα subunits.

The analysis of the final morphology of the adult reproductive system in all of the flies analysed, strongly suggests that there is a failure in male gonad and genital morphogenesis It is possible that loco c3 expression could be the underlying reason for this phenotype. However the variability in testes morphology between flies may hint that there is some level of redundancy between the loco transcripts. Thus, whilst loco is clearly essential, a lack of or reduction of loco c3 expression does not cause a complete failure of gonad and genital differentiation. The loco mutants we isolated still express several loco transcripts, so further mutants will be needed which disrupt different transcripts or sets of transcripts to discover the role of loco and G-protein signalling in spermatogenesis and to further investigate it in imaginal discs and in the somatic cells of the gonad.


We show that all of the known loco spliceforms are expressed in the pupae and testis. In addition to this we have identified a fifth loco transcript, loco c5. We also show that there are a variety of Gα proteins expressed in the testis that may interact with the various LOCO isoforms. We have generated a set of new alleles of loco that affect the expression of specific loco transcripts. These deletions seem to be highly deleterious to Drosophila, as only a few adults hatch and the majority die as larvae. Mutant pupae and adult gonads of the few males that hatch show a loss of loco c3. We propose that loco c3 is needed for correct morphogenesis of the male gonad and the reproductive system derived from the male genital disc during metamorphosis. The role we have observed for loco in morphogenesis is in some ways similar to its role in glial cells where it has been proposed that G-protein signalling is important for shape changes [14]. Although the reproductive system is derived from the genital disc and the testis from the gonad, both tissues are affected. It, therefore, seems likely that loco is involved in cell-cell interactions during evagination and morphogenesis. During these processes cell and tissue shape changes are crucial.

These results support the well-documented findings that G-protein signalling is crucial throughout development. An extensive investigation is needed to identify the binding specificities of different loco isoforms, the temporal and spatial distribution of different loco transcripts and which Gα subunits co-localise with loco in the gonad and genital discs and in the adult male testis. With this information it will be possible to design genetic and molecular experiments to investigate the developmental mechanisms in which loco participates.



Wild-type flies were OrR. Df(3R)17D1 Df(3R)15CE1, loco Δ13 and loco T1 were obtained from Christian Klambt. The original P insertion line was c139; it has an insertion of GAL4 in the loco gene [15]. The mutant lines were generated and described in Pathirana et al 2001 [15]. All Drosophila strains were raised on standard cornmeal-yeast-agar medium at 25°C.

β-galactosidase staining of testes and gonads

Testes and male gonads were dissected from the progeny from c139 crossed to the UAS-lacZ reporter line. Staining was carried out as described by Deng et al 1999 [33].

DNA sequencing

The dideoxy chain determination method was used initially in the form of a Sequenase 3.1 kit (US Biochemicals), followed by automated sequencing on Perkin Elmer ABI 373A and 377A machines using dye labeled primers, then dye labeled terminator reactions. Sequenced fragments were assembled using GCG and GENE-JOCKEY software. Sequence analysis was done with GCG GAP, MAP, FASTA, TFASTA and PILEUP software. Conserved domains were predicted using SMART [34] and the NCBI conserved domain database [35].

Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR

Reverse transcription-PCR was carried out as described in Deng et al 1999 [33]. The primers used to identify transcripts were:








The primer pairs used to identify Gα subunits were:

Gα 73B (G-αF), accession number: CG12232-RA



Gα 49B (Gqα-3) Accession number: U31092



Goα 47A (G-αO) accession number: M30152



Preparation of and analysis of genomic DNA

Homozygous mutants were homogenized in 100 mM Tris pH 8.5, 80 mM NaCl, 50 mM EDTA pH 8, 0.5% (w/v) sucrose, 0.5% (w/v) SDS. The samples were incubated at -70°C for 30 minutes and then 65°C for 30 minutes. Potassium acetate was added to a final concentration of 1 M, the cell debris was discarded and the supernatant precipitated with isopropanol.

Primers designed to the intronic sequence were:





The P element primer used was designed to the inverted repeat:




Leeanne McGurk was supported by the MRC. Stephen Pathirana was supported by a BBSRC studentship. Thorsten Trimbuch was a visiting Biotechnology student from the University of Applied Sciences Berlin and Paulo Columbini was a visiting student from the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy on a Biological Sciences course. Kathleen Rothwell was supported by a BBSRC grant to Mary Bownes and by the University of Edinburgh. We are grateful to George Tzolovsky and Fabio Acquaviva for comments on the manuscript and to Hilary Anderson for help with the manuscript preparation.

Authors’ Affiliations

Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital
European Commission Enterprise and Industry Director General
Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh
Charite – Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Centrum fur Anatomie, Insitut fur Zell- und Neurobiologie
Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory and Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore


  1. De Vries L, Mousli M, Wurmser A, Farquhar MG: GAIP, a protein that specifically interacts with the trimeric G protein G alpha i3, is a member of a protein family with a highly conserved core domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995, 92 (25): 11916-11920. 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11916.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Neubig RR, Siderovski DP: Regulators of G-protein signalling as new central nervous system drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002, 1 (3): 187-197. 10.1038/nrd747.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berman DM, Wilkie TM, Gilman AG: GAIP and RGS4 are GTPase-activating proteins for the Gi subfamily of G protein alpha subunits. Cell. 1996, 86 (3): 445-452. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80117-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hunt TW, Fields TA, Casey PJ, Peralta EG: RGS10 is a selective activator of G alpha i GTPase activity. Nature. 1996, 383 (6596): 175-177. 10.1038/383175a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Granderath S, Klambt C: Identification and functional analysis of the Drosophila gene loco. Methods Enzymol. 2004, 389: 350-363.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Willert K, Logan CY, Arora A, Fish M, Nusse R: A Drosophila Axin homolog, Daxin, inhibits Wnt signaling. Development. 1999, 126 (18): 4165-4173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu C, Li Y, Semenov M, Han C, Baeg GH, Tan Y, Zhang Z, Lin X, He X: Control of beta-catenin phosphorylation/degradation by a dual-kinase mechanism. Cell. 2002, 108 (6): 837-847. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00685-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hart MJ, de los Santos R, Albert IN, Rubinfeld B, Polakis P: Downregulation of beta-catenin by human Axin and its association with the APC tumor suppressor, beta-catenin and GSK3 beta. Curr Biol. 1998, 8 (10): 573-581. 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70226-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Logan CY, Nusse R: The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004, 20: 781-810. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.113126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Castellone MD, Teramoto H, Williams BO, Druey KM, Gutkind JS: Prostaglandin E2 promotes colon cancer cell growth through a Gs-axin-beta-catenin signaling axis. Science. 2005, 310 (5753): 1504-1510. 10.1126/science.1116221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lannutti BJ, Schneider LE: Gprk2 controls cAMP levels in Drosophila development. Dev Biol. 2001, 233 (1): 174-185. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schneider LE, Spradling AC: The Drosophila G-protein-coupled receptor kinase homologue Gprk2 is required for egg morphogenesis. Development. 1997, 124 (13): 2591-2602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yu F, Wang H, Qian H, Kaushik R, Bownes M, Yang X, Chia W: Locomotion defects, together with Pins, regulates heterotrimeric G-protein signaling during Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions. Genes Dev. 2005, 19 (11): 1341-1353. 10.1101/gad.1295505.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Granderath S, Stollewerk A, Greig S, Goodman CS, O'Kane CJ, Klambt C: loco encodes an RGS protein required for Drosophila glial differentiation. Development. 1999, 126 (8): 1781-1791.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pathirana S, Zhao D, Bownes M: The Drosophila RGS protein Loco is required for dorsal/ventral axis formation of the egg and embryo, and nurse cell dumping. Mech Dev. 2001, 109 (2): 137-150. 10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00557-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wolfgang WJ, Quan F, Thambi N, Forte M: Restricted spatial and temporal expression of G-protein alpha subunits during Drosophila embryogenesis. Development. 1991, 113 (2): 527-538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Provost NM, Somers DE, Hurley JB: A Drosophila melanogaster G protein alpha subunit gene is expressed primarily in embryos and pupae. J Biol Chem. 1988, 263 (24): 12070-12076.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fremion F, Astier M, Zaffran S, Guillen A, Homburger V, Semeriva M: The heterotrimeric protein Go is required for the formation of heart epithelium in Drosophila. J Cell Biol. 1999, 145 (5): 1063-1076. 10.1083/jcb.145.5.1063.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Thambi NC, Quan F, Wolfgang WJ, Spiegel A, Forte M: Immunological and molecular characterization of Go alpha-like proteins in the Drosophila central nervous system. J Biol Chem. 1989, 264 (31): 18552-18560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wolfgang WJ, Quan F, Goldsmith P, Unson C, Spiegel A, Forte M: Immunolocalization of G protein alpha-subunits in the Drosophila CNS. J Neurosci. 1990, 10 (3): 1014-1024.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Katanaev VL, Tomlinson A: Dual roles for the trimeric G protein Go in asymmetric cell division in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103 (17): 6524-6529. 10.1073/pnas.0601853103.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. de Sousa SM, Hoveland LL, Yarfitz S, Hurley JB: The Drosophila Go alpha-like G protein gene produces multiple transcripts and is expressed in the nervous system and in ovaries. J Biol Chem. 1989, 264 (31): 18544-18551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Quan F, Wolfgang WJ, Forte M: A Drosophila G-protein alpha subunit, Gf alpha, expressed in a spatially and temporally restricted pattern during Drosophila development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90 (9): 4236-4240. 10.1073/pnas.90.9.4236.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee YJ, Dobbs MB, Verardi ML, Hyde DR: dgq: a drosophila gene encoding a visual system-specific G alpha molecule. Neuron. 1990, 5 (6): 889-898. 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90349-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Strathmann M, Simon MI: G protein diversity: a distinct class of alpha subunits is present in vertebrates and invertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990, 87 (23): 9113-9117. 10.1073/pnas.87.23.9113.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Alvarez CE, Robison K, Gilbert W: Novel Gq alpha isoform is a candidate transducer of rhodopsin signaling in a Drosophila testes-autonomous pacemaker. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93 (22): 12278-12282. 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12278.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Koelle MR, Horvitz HR: EGL-10 regulates G protein signaling in the C. elegans nervous system and shares a conserved domain with many mammalian proteins. Cell. 1996, 84 (1): 115-125. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80998-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Snow BE, Antonio L, Suggs S, Gutstein HB, Siderovski DP: Molecular cloning and expression analysis of rat Rgs12 and Rgs14. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997, 233 (3): 770-777. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6537.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Snow BE, Hall RA, Krumins AM, Brothers GM, Bouchard D, Brothers CA, Chung S, Mangion J, Gilman AG, Lefkowitz RJ, Siderovski DP: GTPase activating specificity of RGS12 and binding specificity of an alternatively spliced PDZ (PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1) domain. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273 (28): 17749-17755. 10.1074/jbc.273.28.17749.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Snow BE, Krumins AM, Brothers GM, Lee SF, Wall MA, Chung S, Mangion J, Arya S, Gilman AG, Siderovski DP: A G protein gamma subunit-like domain shared between RGS11 and other RGS proteins specifies binding to Gbeta5 subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95 (22): 13307-13312. 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13307.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomas EA, Danielson PE, Sutcliffe JG: RGS9: a regulator of G-protein signalling with specific expression in rat and mouse striatum. J Neurosci Res. 1998, 52 (1): 118-124. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19980401)52:1<118::AID-JNR11>3.0.CO;2-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wolfgang WJ, Forte M: Posterior localization of the Drosophila Gi alpha protein during early embryogenesis requires a subset of the posterior group genes. Int J Dev Biol. 1995, 39 (4): 581-586.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Deng W, Leaper K, Bownes M: A targeted gene silencing technique shows that Drosophila myosin VI is required for egg chamber and imaginal disc morphogenesis. J Cell Sci. 1999, 112 ( Pt 21): 3677-3690.Google Scholar
  34. Schultz J, Milpetz F, Bork P, Ponting CP: SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95 (11): 5857-5864. 10.1073/pnas.95.11.5857.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Cherukuri PF, DeWeese-Scott C, Geer LY, Gwadz M, He S, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Ke Z, Lanczycki CJ, Liebert CA, Liu C, Lu F, Marchler GH, Mullokandov M, Shoemaker BA, Simonyan V, Song JS, Thiessen PA, Yamashita RA, Yin JJ, Zhang D, Bryant SH: CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for protein classification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (Database issue): D192-6. 10.1093/nar/gki069.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. ClustalW. []
  37. BoxShade. []


© McGurk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.