Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The role of Zic transcription factors in regulating hindbrain retinoic acid signaling

BMC Developmental Biology volume 13, Article number: 31 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The reiterated architecture of cranial motor neurons aligns with the segmented structure of the embryonic vertebrate hindbrain. Anterior-posterior identity of cranial motor neurons depends, in part, on retinoic acid signaling levels. The early vertebrate embryo maintains a balance between retinoic acid synthetic and degradative zones on the basis of reciprocal expression domains of the retinoic acid synthesis gene aldhehyde dehydrogenase 1a2 (aldh1a2) posteriorly and the oxidative gene cytochrome p450 type 26a1 (cyp26a1) in the forebrain, midbrain, and anterior hindbrain.

Results

This manuscript investigates the role of zinc finger of the cerebellum (zic) transcription factors in regulating levels of retinoic acid and differentiation of cranial motor neurons. Depletion of zebrafish Zic2a and Zic2b results in a strong downregulation of aldh1a2 expression and a concomitant reduction in activity of a retinoid-dependent transgene. The vagal motor neuron phenotype caused by loss of Zic2a/2b mimics a depletion of Aldh1a2 and is rescued by exogenously supplied retinoic acid.

Conclusion

Zic transcription factors function in patterning hindbrain motor neurons through their regulation of embryonic retinoic acid signaling.

Background

During development, the vertebrate hindbrain is transiently divided into a series of lineage-restricted segments, termed rhombomeres, through the expression of distinct transcription factors. Notably, anterior-posterior patterning and segmentation of the hindbrain is critical in appropriately specifying neuronal cell types [1–5]. The identity of each hindbrain segment is regulated by the Hox family of homeobox transcription factors, the anterior expression limits of which correlate precisely with rhombomere boundaries [6–18]. The correct complement of hox genes expressed within each hindbrain segment specifies the identity of cells within that segment by activating regional expression of cell migration and axon guidance molecules. Blocking the functions of Hox proteins or their Pbx (Pre-B cell leukemia) and Meis (Myeloid ecotropic virus integration site) cofactors within the hindbrain leads to changes in rhombomere identity and corresponding defects in cranial motor neuron migration and axon guidance [6, 17, 19–21].

The vitamin A-derived morphogen retinoic acid (RA) regulates anterior-posterior patterning of the neural tube, including defining regional identity of hindbrain segments [22–28]. For example, vitamin A-deficient quail embryos lack posterior rhombomeres r4-r8 [24, 25]. Maintaining the precise level of retinoic acid is critical, with increased levels known to result in teratogenic defects of the forebrain, heart, and eyes [24, 29]. In the hindbrain, segmentation defects associated with changes in retinoic acid are attributed to alterations in hox gene expression [9, 27, 30–33]. For example, an increase in retinoic acid levels causes expansion of the posterior hindbrain hox-4 expression [31, 32], while a deficiency in retinoic acid causes an embryonic loss of hox-1, hox-3, and hox-4 paralog expression domains [16, 17, 26, 28].

Regional specificity of retinoic acid signaling is achieved in part through restricted domains of Retinaldehyde dehydrogenase proteins (Raldh, encoded by the aldh1a gene family), the enzymes that catalyze the rate-limiting step in RA synthesis [34, 35]. Pharmacologic blockade of Raldh activity using diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB) results in ablation of the posterior hindbrain, a phenotype that is highly analogous to the vitamin A-deficient quail [26, 36]. The heme-thiolate family of cytochrome p450 type 26 enzymes (cyp26a1/b1/c1) hydroxylate RA, a modification that targets it for degradation [37, 38]. The forebrain, midbrain and anterior hindbrain express cyp26 genes, thereby blocking RA signaling in these regions [39–43]. The combined activity of posteriorly expressed aldh1a with anterior-specific cyp26 genes creates a defined zone of RA signaling within the presumptive hindbrain. RA activity is mediated intracellularly by two nuclear receptor families, retinoid-X-receptor (RXR) and retinoic acid receptor (RAR) [44–46]. Ligand-bound heterodimeric RXR:RAR complexes activate transcription of genes containing retinoic acid response elements (RAREs). Analysis of conserved non-coding elements surrounding hox-1 and hox-4 paralogs has identified RAREs that are essential to rhombomere-specific expression of hox-1/hox-4 genes in the hindbrain [11, 31, 34, 47, 48]. In support, alterations in RA levels result in profound defects to hox-1 and hox-4 gene expression domains [11, 31, 34, 47, 48].

Although the role and requirement of retinoic acid metabolism genes during embryogenesis has been extensively studied, the factors acting to initiate and maintain expression of RA metabolism genes remain largely unknown. Within vertebrates, transcription factors from the Zic (Zinc Finger of the Cerebellum) family of transcription factors are dynamically expressed in partially overlapping regions of the neural tube, indicative of a role in neural development. Recent evidence suggests a connection between Zic transcription factors and the retinoic acid signaling pathway: Maurus et al. demonstrated that loss of zebrafish Zic1 causes a decrease in presumptive forebrain expression of cyp26a1 and an increase in RA signaling as detected by RARE:eGFP transgenics [49]. Further, mutations in human ZIC2 result in holoprosencephaly (HPE), a forebrain defect where the cerebral hemispheres fail to separate during development [50, 51] and HPE phenotypes have been connected to aberrant RA signaling, thus providing a plausible link between Zic2 and retinoic acid metabolism [29, 36, 52, 53]. Based on these observations, we tested the hypothesis that Zic transcription factors play a key role in the initiation and maintenance of RA metabolism gene expression during zebrafish embryogenesis. The data presented here demonstrate that zebrafish zic2 genes act upstream of retinoic acid metabolism and suggest a novel regulatory interaction between Zic2a and Zic2b transcription factors and the RA-synthesizing gene aldh1a2. Further, we show that Zic2 signaling is necessary for proper hindbrain patterning.

Results and discussion

Zic transcription factors are expressed during the initiation of RA metabolism genes

Retinoic acid levels are regulated by the precise action of synthesis and hydroxylation genes. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1a2 (Aldh1a2, also known as Raldh2), the rate-limiting synthetic enzyme, catalyzes the conversion of retinal to retinoic acid [34, 35, 38]. The transcription of aldh1a2 is initiated early in development, with expression at the embryonic margin at 5 hours post fertilization (hpf) (Figure 1A) and in lateral plate mesoderm by 8 hpf – 10 hpf (Figure 1B-C’) [26, 54, 55]. Beginning at 18 hpf, aldh1a2 expression is restricted to the dorsal retina and anterior somites (Figure 1D). Retinoic acid degradation occurs following its hydroxylation by the cytochrome p450 oxidase, Cyp26a1. cyp26a1 transcription is initiated early during zebrafish embryogenesis, starting with the presumptive anterior neural ectoderm at 5 hpf (Figure 1E) [56, 57]. By early somitogenesis (10 hpf), cyp26a1 mRNA is found in the presumptive forebrain, midbrain, anterior hindbrain, and part of the tailbud (Figure 1G, G’). At the later somitogenesis stages of 16-21 hpf, its expression becomes restricted to parts of the retina, caudal notochord, and tailbud (Figure 1H).

Figure 1
figure 1

Temporal and spatial analysis of zic transcription factors and key RA synthesis and degradation genes. aldh1a2 expression is restricted to the embryonic margin at 5 hpf (A). By 8-10 hpf aldh1a2 is observed in the lateral plate mesoderm (B, C, C’). At 18 hpf, aldh1a2 is expressed in the dorsal retina and anterior somites (D). cyp26a1 is expressed in the embryonic margin and the presumptive anterior neural ectoderm at 5-8 hpf (E, F). By 10-18 hpf cyp26a1 is expressed in presumptive forebrain, midbrain, anterior hindbrain, retina, and part of the tailbud (G, G’, H). zic1 is not detectable until 8-10 hpf (75% epiboly), when it is expressed within the presumptive anterior neural tissue (I, J, K, K’). By 18 hpf, zic1 is expressed strongly in the telencephalon, midbrain-hindbrain boundary, dorsal hindbrain and spinal cord (L). zic2a initiates earlier, with dorsally-restricted expression at 5 hpf (50% epiboly) (M). By 8-10 hpf zic2a becomes anteriorly restricted within presumptive anterior neural tissue with additional midline expression (N, O, O’). By 18 hpf, zic2a is within the anterior forebrain, ventral eye, dorsal hindbrain and spinal cord (P). Initially, zic2b is expressed in a broad domain encompassing the dorsal side of the embryo (Q; 5 hpf). This broad expression is maintained at 8 hpf (R) and 10-18 hpf where expression is strongest within the eye, midbrain-hindbrain boundary, and presumptive hindbrain (S, S’, T). zic3 is also dorsally restricted at 5-8 hpf (U, V). At 10-18 hpf, zic3 is within the presumptive telencephalon, posterior forebrain, midbrain-hindbrain boundary and dorsal hindbrain, and within the tailbud (W, W’, X). Images are dorsal views with anterior to top (A-C, E-G, I-K, M-O, Q-S, U-W) or lateral views with anterior to left (C’, D, G’, H, K’, L, O’, P, S’, T, W’, X). hpf: hours post fertilization.

Full size image

To ascertain whether Zic transcription factors could regulate embryonic initiation of RA metabolism, we first examined which of the seven zebrafish zics are present during the time when cyp26a1 and aldh1a2 mRNA expression are initiated. Using in situ hybridization in conjunction with known expression data, we determined that zic1, zic2a, zic2b, and zic3 are the best candidates for driving initiation of RA metabolism genes because they are expressed at the earliest stages of development [58–60]. zic2a, zic2b, and zic3 are all expressed broadly by 5 hpf, while zic1 expression is not detectable (Figure 1I, M, Q, U). By 8-10 hpf, zic1 and zic2a are expressed in discrete regions consistent with cyp26a1 expression within the anterior neural ectoderm (Figure 1J-K’, M-O’). zic2b and zic3 show broad dorsal expression domains by 8 hpf, in regions that overlap with both anterior expression of cyp26a1 and the more posterior expression domain of aldh1a2 (Figure 1 R, V). As development continues, the zics display expression within the dorsal hindbrain, extending down the spinal cord in varying levels and degrees, showing less obvious overlap with cyp26a1 and aldh1a2 (Figure 1L, P, S-T, W-X). Overall, these data show that zic2a/2b/3 transcription factor expression is consistent both temporally and spatially with the initiation of expression of cyp26a1 and aldh1a2. To ensure that zic gene expression corresponds to the same germ layers as cyp26a1 and aldh1a2, we sectioned 90% epiboly (9 hpf) embryos following in situ hybridization. While cyp26a1 is expressed in the epiblast, and aldh1a2 is limited to the hypoblast, zic2a and zic2b are present diffusely in both germ layers and are therefore co-expressed with both RA metabolism genes (Figure 2A-D).

Figure 2
figure 2

zic2a and zic2b are co-expressed with aldh1a2 and cyp26a1 in the early embryo. 90% epiboly embryos were processed for in situ hybridization for aldh1a2, cyp26a1, zic2a or zic2b, and subsequently mounted in JB-4 resin and cut into 7 μM sections on a microtome. aldh1a2 expression is clearly limited to the hypoblast (A), while cyp26a1 is present in the epiblast (B). In contrast, zic2a and zic2b each show broad expression across the germ layers (C,D).

Full size image

Zics act upstream of early retinoic acid metabolism genes, cyp26a1 and aldh1a2

Based on our observations of zic gene expression, the earliest expressed genes zic2a, zic2b, and zic3 were examined for possible roles in the initiation of RA metabolism. Due to the propensity for functional redundancy, we chose first to simultaneously knock down three transcription factors, Zic2a, Zic2b, and Zic3 with antisense morpholino oligonucleotides. Upon examining resulting phenotypes, we determined that Zic3 depletion is dispensable, and the Zic3 morpholino was removed from the injection mixture. Interestingly, embryos injected with splice-blocking morpholinos for Zic2a and Zic2b display a reduction in cyp26a1 (Figure 3A, B) and aldh1a2 (Figure 3C, D) expression by 7 hpf. While both the cyp26a1 expression level and domain are reduced, the aldh1a2 expression domain is reduced in size, but normal in intensity of staining. Results from quantitative real-time PCR showed a 29% reduction in aldh1a2 expression in Zic2a2b-depleted embryos as compared to control embryos (p-value ≤ 0.0001, unpaired t-test) (Figure 3E). The downregulation of aldh1a2 expression in Zic2a2b-depleted embryos can be observed as late as 18 hpf and 24 hpf (Figure 3F, G and Figure 3H, I respectively); however it is not as profound as the reduction seen in 7 hpf embryos.

Figure 3
figure 3

Zic2a and Zic2b depletion causes down-regulation of the retinoid-metabolism genes, cyp26a1 and aldh1a2 , during early embryogenesis. mRNA in situ hybridization analysis of cyp26a1 (A, B) and aldh1a2 (C, D, F-I) expression reveals a reduction in both genes in Zic2a;Zic2b;p53 morpholino injected embryos (B, D, G, I) compared to control p53-morpholino injected embryos (A, C, F, H). Relative aldh1a2 mRNA expression levels for 7 hpf embryos were determined using quantitative real-time PCR (E). Levels reflect average of 7 technical replicates, with aldh1a2 mRNA at 0.71 significantly reduced (SD = 0.11; *p < 0.0001) compared to normalized control. Images are of 7 hpf embryos in dorsal view with anterior oriented to top (A-D), or lateral views with anterior to the left of 18 hpf (F, G) or 24 hpf embryos (H, I). Error bars depict standard deviation.

Full size image

Zic depletion causes mild alterations to retinoic acid-responsive genes and hindbrain patterning

As Aldh1a2 and Cyp26a1 have opposing effects on RA levels, the knockdown of either gene alone would be expected to produce opposite phenotypes. However, since Zic2a2b depletion reduces both RA metabolism genes simultaneously, the outcome for RA signaling is difficult to predict. Thus, we performed in situ hybridization for retinoic acid-responsive genes to ascertain the overall level of retinoic acid signaling in Zic-depleted embryos. Previous work demonstrated that the expression levels of zebrafish meis3, hoxb1a, hoxd4a, and hnf1ba correlate with changing retinoic acid levels (Hernandez et al., 2004, Huang et al., 2002, Kudoh et al., 2002, Moroni et al., 1993, Zhang et al., 2000). Our results show a strong reduction in meis3 and a mild reduction in hoxd4a expression within the presumptive hindbrain following Zic2a2b knockdown (Figure 4A, B, E, F). Two other retinoic acid-responsive genes, hoxb1a and hnf1ba, did not show significant changes in expression with Zic2a2b morpholino when compared to uninjected controls (Figure 4C, D, G, H). To determine whether the reductions in meis3 and hoxd4a are caused by changes to retinoic acid signaling, we treated zic2a2b morphants with 5 nM retinoic acid. Indeed, 5 nM RA is able to rescue the expression of meis3 and hoxd4a to levels similar to those seen in our uninjected controls (Figure 5A-H). In addition, morpholino knockdown of aldh1a2 causes a similar reduction in meis3 and hoxd4a to that seen in zic2a2b morphants (Figure 5I-L). Thus, our data strongly argue that Zic2a2b promote the expression of RA-responsive genes through Aldh1a2.

Figure 4
figure 4

Retinoic acid-responsive gene expression in Zic morpholino-injected embryos. mRNA transcript expression of RA-dependent markers meis3 and otx2 (A, B), hnf1ba (C, D), hoxd4a (E, F), and hoxb1a (G, H) were compared in control uninjected (A, C, E, G) and Zic2a;Zic2b;Zic3MO-injected embryos (B, D, F, H). Although hoxb1a and hnf1ba are largely unchanged, a decrease in meis3 and hoxd4a is observed in Zic morpholino-injected embryos. All images are of 10.5 hpf embryos in dorsal views with anterior oriented to top.

Full size image
Figure 5
figure 5

Gene expression changes upon Zic2 knockdown can be rescued by RA treatment and is mimicked by Aldh1a2 knockdown. mRNA in situ analysis of meis3 (A-D, I-J), hoxd4a (E-H, K-L) and aldh1a2 (M-N). Uninjected embryos were treated with DMSO (A, E) or 5 nm RA (B, F) and compared to Zic2a;Zic2bMO-injected embryos treated with DMSO (C, G) or 5 nm RA (D, H). The decrease in meis3 and hoxd4a observed in Zic morpholino-injected embryos is rescued by treatment with 5 nm RA. Aldh1a2MO-injected embryos (J, L) show a decrease in meis3 and hoxd4a when compared to controls (I, K). In cyp26a1 (giraffe) mutants (N), aldh1a2 levels remain unchanged compared to WT siblings (M). Images are dorsal views of 10.5 hpf (A-L) and 8 hpf (M-N) embryos oriented with anterior to the top.

Full size image

We took advantage of manipulating RA levels to further examine the regulatory loops present in the early zebrafish embryo. Given that zic2a2b morpholinos cause a loss in cyp26a1 expression, it is plausible that this causes an indirect effect on the aldh1a2 domain. To test this, we examined expression of aldh1a2 in mutants lacking cyp26a1. Notably, aldh1a2 levels are unaffected in cyp26a1(giraffe) mutants, arguing against a scenario whereby the aldh1a2 reduction in zic2a2b morphants occurs because of reduced hydroxylation of RA by Cyp26a1 (Figure 5M, N).

Based on the observation that retinoic acid signaling is reduced in zic2a2b morphants, we examined whether zic2a2b depletion also led to defects in hindbrain patterning. In situ hybridization for hindbrain markers (krox20, mafba, hoxb4a, hoxb1a, egfl6) was performed to examine hindbrain segmentation and rhombomere morphology (Figure 6). We found that all rhombomeres are formed, but that rhombomeres 3 and 5 (egr2b/krox20 expression) are reduced in size (Figure 6C, D) and there is reduced hoxa2b expression within r2-r6 (Figure 6A, B). In addition, hoxb4a expression within the posterior hindbrain and spinal cord is also reduced (Figure 6C, D). Other regions within the hindbrain appear normal as observed through appropriate marker expression patterns (Figure 6E-L). This suggests that although there is a reduction in the posterior neural domain, the reduction of retinoic acid signaling in zic2a2b morphants does not lead to a complete loss of posterior regions.

Figure 6
figure 6

Hindbrain patterning in Zic morpholino-injected embryos. mRNA expression of hindbrain segmentation markers hoxa2b/aldh1a2 (A, B), krox20/hoxb4a/wnt1 (C, D), hoxb1a (E,F), mafba/wnt1 (G, H), and egfl6 (I-L) were examined in control uninjected (A, C, E, G, I, J) and Zic2a;Zic2b;Zic3MO-injected embryos (B, D, F, H, K, L). We note a reduction in hoxa2b expression in Zic morphant embryos (compare B to A) as well as a thinning of rhombomeres 3 and 5, as labeled by krox20 expression (compare D to C). Expression of hoxb4a is reduced (compare D to C), but other markers of segment identity are overtly normal (E-L). Embryos are shown in dorsal (A-H, J, L) or lateral (I, K) views and are 18 hpf.

Full size image

Zic2a2b depletion reduces retinoic acid signaling

The transgenic zebrafish line Tg(12xRARE-ef1a:eGFP)sk71 contains twelve retinoic acid response elements (RAREs) upstream of a ubiquitous promoter linked to the gene for enhanced green fluorescent protein, eGFP[61, 62]. Active retinoic acid signaling in Tg(12xRARE-ef1a:eGFP)sk71 fish can be detected either directly by observation of eGFP fluorescence, or by in situ hybridization for eGFP mRNA. The sensitivity of this transgenic line was examined by assaying its response to alterations in retinoic acid levels (Figure 7). In 26 and 48 hpf control embryos, the predominant regions of retinoic acid signaling are within the spinal cord and posterior hindbrain (Figure 7B, E, H, K, N). As expected, the fluorescence domain is increased at both stages in response to retinoic acid treatment, expanding further anteriorly into the hindbrain and posteriorly down the spinal cord (Figure 7C, F, I, L, O). At 48 hpf, there are additional retinoic acid signaling centers within the dorsal and ventral eye (Figure 7H’, K). Here, exogenous addition of retinoic acid results in morphologically smaller eyes and loss of the dorsal expression domain, while the ventral eGFP-positive region is maintained (Figure 7I’, L). Blocking retinoic acid synthesis with DEAB treatment results in a loss of all retinoic acid signaling, with no fluorescence or in situ coloration visible at 26 hpf or 48 hpf (Figure 7D, G, J, J’, M, P). These results demonstrate that the Tg(12xRARE-ef1a:eGFP)sk71 zebrafish line is a suitable tool for studying retinoic acid signaling. Of note, we were unable to detect the transgene before 24 hpf, preventing the analysis of retinoic acid signaling levels at early embryonic stages, when retinoic acid metabolism genes are first transcribed.

Figure 7
figure 7

Validation of RARE:eGFP reporter. Tg(12xRARE-ef1a:eGFP)sk71 transgenic embryos (described in A) were evaluated for altered signals when RA signaling was manipulated. Embryos were treated with a vehicle control, DMSO (B, E, H, H’, K, N), 5 nM all-trans retinoic acid (C, F, I, I’, L, O), or 5 μM DEAB (D, G, J, J’, M, P). We note an expansion of hindbrain/spinal cord expression of the transgene in 5 nM RA-treated embryos, and a complete loss in 5 μM DEAB-treated embryos. Altered expression is detectable by examination of fluorescence using a stereomicroscope (B-G), confocal microscope (H-J’), or by in situ hybridization with a probe to eGFP (K-P). All embryos are shown in lateral view at 48 hpf (B-M) or 26 hpf (N-P). The inset panels (H’-J’) display reporter activity in the ventral retina.

Full size image

As the Tg(12xRARE-ef1a:eGFP) transgenic line labels posterior retinoic acid signaling regions, we asked whether the reduction in retinoic acid metabolism genes following Zic depletion leads to an alteration in later embryonic retinoic acid signaling levels. As compared to control eGFP levels (Figure 8A, B), there is a strong reduction in eGFP expression in 75% of the zic2a2b morphant embryos at 26 hpf (Figure 8C, D, E). This suggests that there is a reduction in retinoic acid signaling within the Zic2a2b-depleted hindbrain at later stages. To test the hypothesis that the reduction in retinoic acid signaling in zic2a2b morphants is a result of reduced aldh1a2 expression, we compared retinoic acid signaling between Aldh1a2-depleted and Cyp26a1-depleted embryos. eGFP levels appear only slightly affected in cyp26a1 MO-injected embryos as compared to control (Figure 8A, F). However, strikingly, there is a strong reduction in retinoic acid signaling levels across both Zic2a2b and Aldh1a2 knockdowns, as shown by strong reduction of eGFP transcript as compared to controls (Figure 8A, C, G). Taken together, these data show that we have identified a novel regulatory mechanism whereby Zic2a2b regulates retinoic acid levels, most likely through the regulation of aldh1a2 transcription.

Figure 8
figure 8

Zic2a and Zic2b depletion reduces RA signaling levels. Tg(12xRARE-ef1a:eGFP)sk71 transgenic embryos were used to assay the level of RA signaling. To increase sensitivity of transgene detection, in situ hybridization for eGFP was employed. Control p53MO-injected embryos (A, B) were compared with Zic2a;2b;p53MO-injected embryos (C, D). Quantification of reduction in eGFP in Zic2a;2b;p53 morphants is displayed graphically with reduced expression in 75 ± 2% of embryos (p-value = 0.0004; unpaired t-test). Cyp26a1 (F) and Aldh1a2 (G) morpholinos were also injected into Tg(12xRARE-ef1a:eGFP)sk71 embryos to compare effects with those obtained using Zic morpholinos. Images are of 26 hpf embryos in lateral (A, C, F, G) and dorsal (B, D) views with anterior to left and top, respectively.

Full size image

Vagal neurons are sensitive to alterations in retinoic acid levels

Our results demonstrated strong deficits in RA signaling at 26 hpf, a key time-point for specification and differentiation of hindbrain branchiomotor neurons [1]. To determine the developmental consequence of the reduction in retinoic acid signaling, we chose to examine development of vagal motor neurons within the posterior hindbrain and spinal cord [55]. Using the Tg(isl1:eGFP) transgenic line, we sought to analyze development of hindbrain branchiomotor neurons by confocal microscopy in response to Zic2a2b depletion [63]. In control embryos, trigeminal neuron cell bodies are located within rhombomeres 2 and 3, facial neurons within rhombomeres 5 and 6, and the vagal neuron domain extends from the posterior hindbrain down the spinal cord (Figure 9A, D). To estimate the number of vagal neurons, we used ImageJ to quantify the area and length of the vagal neuron cluster (Figure 9G, H). Upon treatment with retinoic acid, the vagal domain is greatly expanded and more neuronal cell bodies are visible as compared to control (Figure 9B, E, G, H). The average area in DMSO-treated control embryos is 5481 μm2 (SD = 321 μm2) and the anterior-posterior length is 165 μm (SD = 4.5 μm). Treatment with RA results in an average area of 10,353 μm2 (SD = 1448 μm2; p-value ≤ 0.01) and length of 214 μm (SD = 11 μm; p-value ≤ 0.01). Alternatively, treatment with DEAB, a pharmacological inhibitor of retinoic acid synthesis, significantly alters embryonic patterning such that all posterior rhombomeres are lost. The vagal domain is almost undetectable in these embryos (Figure 9C, F, G, H). DEAB treatment also results in mispatterning of anterior branchiomotor neuron classes such that it is difficult to identify trigeminal, facial, and possible remnants of vagal neuron populations. As a best estimate, the area of vagal neurons in DEAB-treated embryos is 1683 μm2 (SD = 1264 μm2; p-value ≤ 0.01) and length is 65 μm (SD = 20 μm; p-value ≤0.01).

Figure 9
figure 9

Vagal neurons are sensitive to alterations in retinoic acid levels. Tg(isl1:eGFP) transgenic zebrafish are used to visualize alterations to branchiomotor neurons in response to 1% DMSO (A, D), 5 nM all-trans retinoic acid (B, E), or 5 μM DEAB (C, F) treatment. Images are dorsal views of 48 hpf embryo hindbrain using 20× or (A-C) or 40× (D-F) objective. Length (G) and area (H) were quantified using ImageJ and displayed graphically (error bar denotes standard deviation). The differences induced by either retinoic acid or DEAB treatment are statistically significant (ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test, *p-value < 0.01).

Full size image

Zic2a2b knockdown causes loss of vagal neurons

Zic2a2b-depleted embryos have reduced retinoic acid signaling levels within the posterior hindbrain and spinal cord. To ascertain whether this reduction in retinoic acid signaling causes a concomitant defect in vagal motor neurons, Zic2a2b knockdown was introduced in Tg(isl1:eGFP) transgenic zebrafish. Embryos were grown in media containing DMSO (control) or treated with exogenous retinoic acid (1 nM) or DEAB (1 μM) to determine if retinoic acid supplementation could rescue phenotypes. Zic-depleted embryos have significantly reduced vagal neuron area and length as compared to control embryos (Figure 10A, D, G, H). The average area of the vagal neuron domain in Zic-depleted embryos is 4979 μm2 (SD = 1443 μm2) as compared to 7382.5 μm2 (SD = 377.2) in controls. The average length of the vagal neuron domain is 126.4 μm (SD = 13.8) as compared to 176.6 μm (SD = 10.5) in controls (n = 15, p-value < 0.01). This reduction in the vagal neuron domain would be expected with a mild reduction in retinoic acid levels. In many cases, the medial-lateral width of each vagal population was increased in morphants, suggesting a possible migrational error, as vagal neurons are typically formed medially and migrate laterally during development [1]. The physiological level of retinoic acid is estimated to be 3 nM [64, 65]. Due to reduced retinoic levels in Zic-depleted embryos, we postulated that supplementation with near physiological levels (1 nM) of retinoic acid (a concentration that does not cause significant alteration to control embryos) may be sufficient to rescue the neural phenotype seen. There is a mild increase in vagal neuron area and length in control embryos in response to 1 nM retinoic acid treatment (Figure 10B, G, H). Strikingly, with low dose treatment of retinoic acid, the vagal neuron area of Zic-depleted embryos is rescued to values similar to those seen in control embryos: RA-treated, Zic-depleted embryos have an average vagal neuron area of of 8616.4 μm2 (SD = 1929 μm2) as compared to an average area in control embryos of 8963.8 μm2 (SD = 1139.1 μm2) or 4979.3 μm2 (SD = 1443 μm2) in DMSO-treated zic2a2b morphants. There is also a significant increase in the length of the vagal domain in zic2a2b morphants treated with retinoic acid as compared to morphants in DMSO (vehicle control) conditions (Figure 10D, E, G, H): RA-treated morphants have a vagal domain length of 156 μm (SD = 16 μm), compared to 126 μm (SD = 14; p-value < 0.01; n = 14) for DMSO-treated morphants. While the domain length after RA treatment is similar to that of untreated control embryos, it is still significantly reduced compared to control embryos treated with retinoic acid. We asked whether zic2a2b morphants had residual RA by treating them with DEAB. By further reducing retinoic acid levels with DEAB treatment, there is a roughly equivalent shrinkage of the vagal neuron domain in both zic2a2b morphants and control embryos (Figure 10C, F, G, H).

Figure 10
figure 10

Vagal neuron domain in Zic2a and Zic2b morpholino injected embryos is partially rescued with low doses of RA. Dorsal views of the vagal motor neurons in 48 hpf Tg(isl1:eGFP) embryos that were injected with p53 morpholino (A-C) or Zic2a;Zic2b and p53 morpholinos (D-F), and treated with 1% DMSO (A, D), 1 nM RA (B, E), or 1 μM DEAB (C, F). Quantification of vagal motor neuron domain area (G) demonstrates that Zic2a/2b depletion causes a statistically significant reduction in domain size, which is rescued by treatment with retinoic acid. Quantification of vagal neuron domain length (H) gives similar results, with a statistically significant reduction upon Zic2 depletion, which could again be counteracted by retinoic acid addition. Statistical significance calculated by ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test (*p-value ≤ 0.01).

Full size image

Our data is consistent with a model whereby Zic2a and Zic2b act upstream of retinoic acid metabolism by activating transcription of aldh1a2. As shown, there is an early reduction in aldh1a2 transcript levels in Zic2a2b morphants, and the reduction in retinoic acid signaling levels within Tg(12xRARE-ef1a:eGFP) transgenics is similar in Zic2a2b and Aldh1a2-depleted embryos. Further, the reduction in vagal neurons in zic2a2b morphants is rescued by treatment with retinoic acid, the product of an Aldh1a2-catalyzed reaction. To determine if this relationship between Zic2a2b and aldh1a2 is maintained in later neurons, vagal neurons were examined in aldh1a2 morphant Tg(isl1:eGFP) zebrafish. The Aldh1a2-depleted embryos also show a statistically significant reduction in length of the vagal domain, very similar to that seen in Zic2a2b-depleted embryos (compare Figures 10 and 11). The comparable reduction in vagal domain length supports the hypothesis that Zic2a2b act upstream of aldh1a2. Taken together, our data show that the most posterior class of branchiomotor neurons, the vagal neurons, is sensitive to alterations in retinoic acid levels. Increased retinoic acid causes an expansion in the area and length of the vagal neuronal population, while retinoic acid depletion reduces the population. Consistent with this observation, the reduction in retinoic acid signaling levels in Zic2a2b-depleted embryos elicits a reduction in the size of the vagal neuron domain. Importantly, the vagal neuron domain in Zic2a2b-depleted embryos can be rescued by supplementation of RA to physiological levels.

Figure 11
figure 11

Knockdown of Aldh1a2 causes a reduction in the vagal neuron domain. Analysis of vagal motor neurons in Tg(isl1:eGFP) transgenic embryos injected with either a p53 control morpholino (1 ng, A) or an Aldh1a2 morpholino (2 ng, B). The length of the vagal domain was quantified using Image J (C). Significance calculated using an unpaired t-test (*p-value ≤0.01; n = 2, 6 for quantification of p53MO and Aldh1a2 MO, respectively).

Full size image

Conclusions

We have identified a novel regulatory mechanism between Zic2a2b transcription factors and early retinoic acid signaling levels. We propose a model whereby Zic2a and Zic2b act upstream of both retinoic acid synthesis (aldh1a2) and degradation (cyp26a1) genes in an early embryo. We see a persistent reduction in retinoic acid signaling in Zic2a2b morphants at 26 hpf that is similar to that observed in embryos depleted of the main retinoic acid synthesis enzyme, Aldh1a2. Consistent with reduced retinoic acid levels, Zic2a2b knockdown results in reduced vagal motor neuron formation within the posterior hindbrain and spinal cord. This phenotype is nearly identical to Aldh1a2-depleted embryos and is rescued by exogenous retinoic acid treatment.

While the role and requirement for retinoic acid metabolism genes has been well studied, less is known about the upstream regulators of these factors. During mouse development, Hoxa1-Pbx1 (Pre-B-cell leukemia homeobox 1) complexes directly regulate Raldh2 transcription within mesodermal tissue [66]. Additionally, deficiencies in zebrafish Tgif and Hmx4 cause defects associated with reduced retinoic acid levels and reduced aldh1a2 transcription [36, 67]. Interestingly, Tgif-depletion also results in a concomitant reduction in cyp26a1 mRNA levels, similar to defects observed in Zic-depleted embryos. As expected, the Cyp26a1 murine mutant has defects associated with increased retinoic acid levels [41]. More notably, rescue of these defects is observed with heterozygous disruption of Aldh1a2 in a Cyp26a1 murine mutant, suggesting co-dependency between these genes, where less retinoic acid degradation is necessary when retinoic acid synthesis is reduced [38]. Thus, the fact that the transcription factors Zic2a and Zic2b regulate expression of both retinoic acid and synthesis genes strongly suggests that they play an important role in regulating retinoic acid levels during early embryogenesis.

Holoprosencephaly (HPE) is the most common forebrain birth defect, occurring when the cerebral hemispheres fail to separate. Mutations in human ZIC2 and TGIF are known to cause HPE. Our results from zebrafish studies provide evidence that both of these genes function to regulate RA metabolism [36]. Although both Zic and Tgif genes are implicated in regulating multiple signaling pathways, it is now plausible that altered levels of RA predispose embryos to HPE.

Methods

Zebrafish care

Danio rerio were maintained in accordance with published protocols [68]. Zebrafish adults and embryos were maintained at 28.5°C. Embryos were raised in embryo medium (EM) with 10 ml/l Penicillin/Streptomycin (Sigma) added to prevent bacterial growth, and with phenyl-thiourea (0.003%) used to prevent pigmentation after 24 hpf. The stage of developing embryos was assessed using reported morphological guidelines (Kimmel et al., 1995). Wild type AB, Tg(isl1:eGFP), and Tg(12xRARE-ef1μ:eGFP) strains were used as described [61–63]. Animal protocols were approved by the University of Alberta’s Animal Care and Use Committee-Biosciences with protocol #427.

Morpholino injections

Splice-blocking Zic2aMO [ 2 ng/ml; 5’-CTCACCTGAGAAGGAAAACATCATA-3’; [69]], splice-blocking Zic2bMO [2 ng/ml; 5’-CACGAATTGAAATAATTACCAGTGT-3’], splice-blocking Zic3MO [3 ng/ml; 5’-GGAATTTAATTTCCTTACCTGTGTG-3’], translation-blocking Aldh1a2MO [2 ng/ml; 5’-GCAGTTCAACTTCACTGGAGGTCAT-3’; [54, 70]], translation-blocking Cyp26a1MO [2 ng/ml; 5’-CGCGCAACTGATCGCCAAAACGAAA-3’; [71]], and p53MO morpholinos [1 ng/ml] were designed to produce a non-functional protein [72]. Embryos were injected at the one-cell stage and allowed to develop until the desired time-point for phenotypic characterization.

Examination of retinoic acid signaling

To manipulate retinoic acid levels in developing zebrafish embryos, we used pharmacological treatment (1 or 5 nM of all-trans retinoic acid (Sigma); 1 or 5 μM diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB, Sigma)) or morpholinos (Cyp26a1 or Aldh1a2) that target enzymes known to regulate degradation and synthesis of endogenous RA. Embryos were treated at approximately 50% epiboly with DEAB or RA in Embryo Medium, with DMSO and ethanol used as vehicle controls. Embryos were manually dechorionated at 26 hpf and, maintaining treatment concentration, media was changed once per day. All treatments were carried out in 60 mm petri dishes each containing approximately 40 embryos grown at 28.5°C. Tg(12xRARE- ef1a:eGFP) transgenic zebrafish allow visualization of RA-signaling levels by assaying fluorescence (or by in situ hybridization for eGFP mRNA).

Whole mount in situhybridization

mRNA in situ hybridization procedure is based on previously published methods [36]. Probes were synthesized via a PCR-based approach whereby primers are designed to amplify the 3’ untranslated region (primer sequences available on request) [73]. Embryos of desired stage were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), permeabilized in Proteinase K (10 μg/ml), re-fixed in 4% PFA and pre-hybridized for 2 hours at 65°C. 100 μg of probe was added and hybridization allowed to proceed overnight. Unbound probe was removed with three 20-minute high-stringency washes (0.2× SSC + 0.1% Tween-20; 0.1× SSC + 0.1% Tween-20; 0.1× SSC + 0.1% Tween-20). Embryos were first incubated in Blocking Solution (2% Sheep Serum + 2 mg/ml Bovine Serum Albumin in PBST) for one hour at room temperature, or 4°C overnight, before transfer into primary antibody (Blocking Solution + 1/5000 dilution of sheep anti-DIG-AP-FAB fragments antibody (Roche)) for two hours at room temperature, or 4°C overnight. Embryos are washed out of antibody using five-fifteen minute PBST washes. The coloration reaction is performed with either nitro-blue tetrazolium (NBT)/bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BCIP) stock (Roche) in Coloration Buffer or, for embryos before bud stage, with BM purple (Roche). Coloration was stopped via 100% methanol/0.1% Tween-20 washes. Deyolked embryos were dehydrated in 50% glycerol, then 70% glycerol before mounting. Images are taken on Zeiss Axio Imager.Z1 using Axovision SE64 Rel.4.8 software. Embryos in early development (6-14 hpf) or with yolk attached are photographed on Olympus SZX12 stereoscope using QImaging micropublisher camera.

JB-4 sectioning

After in situ hybridization, embryos were post-fixed for 2 hours at room temperature in 4% paraformaldehyde. Embryos were then rinsed in PBS, dehydrated through a series of ethanol washes, and incubated over one hour in two rinses of JB-4 infiltration solution (made as per manufacturer’s instructions, Polysciences Inc.). After transferring the embryos to molds, the infiltration solution was replaced with JB-4 embedding media and the blocks were left to harden at room temperature overnight. Seven μM sections were cut on a Leica RM2235 microtome and images were captured on a Zeiss Axio Imager.Z1 using Axovision SE64 Rel.4.8 software.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Quantitative Real-Time PCR was used to quantify in vivo mRNA levels to ascertain aldh1a2 gene expression in morpholino-injected embryos. Primers were designed using Roche Universal Probe Library for Zebrafish [Forward 5’-AACCACTGAACACGGACCTC-3’ and Reverse 5’-ATGAGCTCCAGCACACGTC-3’]. After RNA isolation (Ambion RNAqueous), DNA was removed by DNAseI digestion (19 μl DEPC-treated H2O, 10 μl 10× DNAseI buffer, 1 μl DNAseI (Ambion)) for 30 minutes at 37°C. RNA was further purified using Qiagen RNeasy columns and cDNA synthesized using AffinityScript qPCR cDNA Synthesis kit (Ambion) by the recommended protocol. Quantitative RT-PCR and primer validation was carried out as previously described [74, 75]. For primer validation, control (AB) cDNA was isolated and used to create a dilution series: 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, 1/64, 1/128, 1/256. Ambion Brilliant II qPCR kit with thermocycler conditions 40× denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds; annealing at 55°C for 1 minute; and extension at 72°C for 30 seconds. Finally, relative gene expression level was determined using the comparative Ct method (2−∆∆Ct method) and unpaired t-test calculations for significance [74, 75]. Reaction mixtures and thermocycler program were identical to primer validation protocol; a 1/16 dilution of experimental and control cDNA was used with each primer pair. Reactions were completed with at least 7 technical replicates from RNA isolated from 50 embryos, comparing to ef1a as endogenous control.

Imaging of cranial motor neurons

The Tg(isl1:eGFP) transgenic line allows visualization of a subset of motor neurons including those that are located within midbrain and hindbrain: oculomotor, trochlear, trigeminal, facial, glossopharyngeal, and vagal neurons [63]. For fluorescent analysis, embryos were fixed with 4% PFA for 4 hours at room temperature. Yolks were removed manually and embryos dehydrated in 50% and 70% glycerol before mounting and imaging using a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope and Zeiss Zen software. Image preparation and analysis (quantification of vagal neuron fluorescent area and length of vagal domain) was done with ImageJ software. To calculate vagal area, Z-stacked images were converted to 8-bit color and scale was set to correspond with that of image (pixel length 1024 or 2048, length of field of view 319.93 μm). Image threshold was set capturing the greatest number of neurons while keeping noise low. Regions of fluorescence were selected and the area calculated with numerical information transferred to Microsoft excel, where totals and averages were calculated. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test, or by an unpaired t-test.

References

  1. Chandrasekhar A, Moens CB, Warren JT, Kimmel CB, Kuwada JY: Development of branchiomotor neurons in zebrafish. Development. 1997, 124 (13): 2633-2644.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lumsden A: The cellular basis of segmentation in the developing hindbrain. Trends Neurosci. 1990, 13 (8): 329-335. 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90144-Y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lumsden A, Keynes R: Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature. 1989, 337 (6206): 424-428. 10.1038/337424a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moens CB, Prince VE: Constructing the hindbrain: insights from the zebrafish. Dev dyn off publ American Assoc Anatomists. 2002, 224 (1): 1-17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wilkinson DG: Genetic control of segmentation in the vertebrate hindbrain. Perspect Dev Neurobiol. 1995, 3 (1): 29-38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrow JR, Stadler HS, Capecchi MR: Roles of Hoxa1 and Hoxa2 in patterning the early hindbrain of the mouse. Development. 2000, 127 (5): 933-944.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bell E, Wingate RJ, Lumsden A: Homeotic transformation of rhombomere identity after localized Hoxb1 misexpression. Science. 1999, 284 (5423): 2168-2171. 10.1126/science.284.5423.2168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper KL, Leisenring WM, Moens CB: Autonomous and nonautonomous functions for Hox/Pbx in branchiomotor neuron development. Dev Biol. 2003, 253 (2): 200-213. 10.1016/S0012-1606(02)00018-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferretti E, Marshall H, Popperl H, Maconochie M, Krumlauf R, Blasi F: Segmental expression of Hoxb2 in r4 requires two separate sites that integrate cooperative interactions between Prep1. Pbx and Hox proteins Dev. 2000, 127 (1): 155-166.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gavalas A, Davenne M, Lumsden A, Chambon P, Rijli FM: Role of Hoxa-2 in axon pathfinding and rostral hindbrain patterning. Development. 1997, 124 (19): 3693-3702.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gavalas A, Studer M, Lumsden A, Rijli FM, Krumlauf R, Chambon P: Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and second pharyngeal arch. Development. 1998, 125 (6): 1123-1136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Helmbacher F, Pujades C, Desmarquet C, Frain M, Rijli FM, Chambon P, Charnay P: Hoxa1 and Krox-20 synergize to control the development of rhombomere 3. Development. 1998, 125 (23): 4739-4748.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Krumlauf R, Marshall H, Studer M, Nonchev S, Sham MH, Lumsden A: Hox homeobox genes and regionalisation of the nervous system. J Neurobiol. 1993, 24 (10): 1328-1340. 10.1002/neu.480241006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McClintock JM, Kheirbek MA, Prince VE: Knockdown of duplicated zebrafish hoxb1 genes reveals distinct roles in hindbrain patterning and a novel mechanism of duplicate gene retention. Development. 2002, 129 (10): 2339-2354.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prince VE, Moens CB, Kimmel CB, Ho RK: Zebrafish hox genes: expression in the hindbrain region of wild-type and mutants of the segmentation gene, valentino. Development. 1998, 125 (3): 393-406.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rossel M, Capecchi MR: Mice mutant for both Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 show extensive remodeling of the hindbrain and defects in craniofacial development. Development. 1999, 126 (22): 5027-5040.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Studer M, Gavalas A, Marshall H, Ariza-McNaughton L, Rijli FM, Chambon P, Krumlauf R: Genetic interactions between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 reveal new roles in regulation of early hindbrain patterning. Development. 1998, 125 (6): 1025-1036.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilkinson DG, Bhatt S, Cook M, Boncinelli E, Krumlauf R: Segmental expression of Hox-2 homoeobox-containing genes in the developing mouse hindbrain. Nature. 1989, 341 (6241): 405-409. 10.1038/341405a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Popperl H, Rikhof H, Chang H, Haffter P, Kimmel CB, Moens CB: lazarus is a novel pbx gene that globally mediates hox gene function in zebrafish. Mol Cell. 2000, 6 (2): 255-267. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00027-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Waskiewicz AJ, Rikhof HA, Hernandez RE, Moens CB: Zebrafish Meis functions to stabilize Pbx proteins and regulate hindbrain patterning. Development. 2001, 128 (21): 4139-4151.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Waskiewicz AJ, Rikhof HA, Moens CB: Eliminating zebrafish pbx proteins reveals a hindbrain ground state. Dev Cell. 2002, 3 (5): 723-733. 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00319-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alexandre D, Clarke JD, Oxtoby E, Yan YL, Jowett T, Holder N: Ectopic expression of Hoxa-1 in the zebrafish alters the fate of the mandibular arch neural crest and phenocopies a retinoic acid-induced phenotype. Development. 1996, 122 (3): 735-746.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Holder N, Hill J: Retinoic acid modifies development of the midbrain-hindbrain border and affects cranial ganglion formation in zebrafish embryos. Development. 1991, 113 (4): 1159-1170.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maden M: Heads or tails? Retinoic acid will decide. Bioessays. 1999, 21 (10): 809-812. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199910)21:10<809::AID-BIES2>3.0.CO;2-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maden M, Gale E, Kostetskii I, Zile M: Vitamin A-deficient quail embryos have half a hindbrain and other neural defects. Curr Biol. 1996, 6 (4): 417-426. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00509-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maves L, Kimmel CB: Dynamic and sequential patterning of the zebrafish posterior hindbrain by retinoic acid. Dev Biol. 2005, 285 (2): 593-605. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.07.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Papalopulu N, Clarke JD, Bradley L, Wilkinson D, Krumlauf R, Holder N: Retinoic acid causes abnormal development and segmental patterning of the anterior hindbrain in Xenopus embryos. Development. 1991, 113 (4): 1145-1158.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van der Wees J, Schilthuis JG, Koster CH, Diesveld-Schipper H, Folkers GE, van der Saag PT, Dawson MI, Shudo K, van der Burg B, Durston AJ: Inhibition of retinoic acid receptor-mediated signalling alters positional identity in the developing hindbrain. Development. 1998, 125 (3): 545-556.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gongal PA, French CR, Waskiewicz AJ: Aberrant forebrain signaling during early development underlies the generation of holoprosencephaly and coloboma. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011, 1812 (3): 390-401. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.09.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Frasch M, Chen X, Lufkin T: Evolutionary-conserved enhancers direct region-specific expression of the murine Hoxa-1 and Hoxa-2 loci in both mice and Drosophila. Development. 1995, 121 (4): 957-974.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gould A, Itasaki N, Krumlauf R: Initiation of rhombomeric Hoxb4 expression requires induction by somites and a retinoid pathway. Neuron. 1998, 21 (1): 39-51. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80513-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Morrison A, Ariza-McNaughton L, Gould A, Featherstone M, Krumlauf R: HOXD4 and regulation of the group 4 paralog genes. Development. 1997, 124 (16): 3135-3146.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yan YL, Jowett T, Postlethwait JH: Ectopic expression of hoxb2 after retinoic acid treatment or mRNA injection: disruption of hindbrain and craniofacial morphogenesis in zebrafish embryos. Dev dyn off publ American Assoc Anatomists. 1998, 213 (4): 370-385.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Niederreither K, Subbarayan V, Dolle P, Chambon P: Embryonic retinoic acid synthesis is essential for early mouse post-implantation development. Nat Genet. 1999, 21 (4): 444-448. 10.1038/7788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Niederreither K, Vermot J, Schuhbaur B, Chambon P, Dolle P: Retinoic acid synthesis and hindbrain patterning in the mouse embryo. Development. 2000, 127 (1): 75-85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gongal PA, Waskiewicz AJ: Zebrafish model of holoprosencephaly demonstrates a key role for TGIF in regulating retinoic acid metabolism. Hum Mol Genet. 2008, 17 (4): 525-538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Abu-Abed S, Dolle P, Metzger D, Beckett B, Chambon P, Petkovich M: The retinoic acid-metabolizing enzyme, CYP26A1, is essential for normal hindbrain patterning, vertebral identity, and development of posterior structures. Genes dev. 2001, 15 (2): 226-240. 10.1101/gad.855001.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Niederreither K, Abu-Abed S, Schuhbaur B, Petkovich M, Chambon P, Dolle P: Genetic evidence that oxidative derivatives of retinoic acid are not involved in retinoid signaling during mouse development. Nat Genet. 2002, 31 (1): 84-88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. de Roos K, Sonneveld E, Compaan B, ten Berge D, Durston AJ, van der Saag PT: Expression of retinoic acid 4-hydroxylase (CYP26) during mouse and Xenopus laevis embryogenesis. Mech Dev. 1999, 82 (1–2): 205-211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hernandez RE, Putzke AP, Myers JP, Margaretha L, Moens CB: Cyp26 enzymes generate the retinoic acid response pattern necessary for hindbrain development. Development. 2007, 134 (1): 177-187. 10.1242/dev.02706.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sakai Y, Meno C, Fujii H, Nishino J, Shiratori H, Saijoh Y, Rossant J, Hamada H: The retinoic acid-inactivating enzyme CYP26 is essential for establishing an uneven distribution of retinoic acid along the anterio-posterior axis within the mouse embryo. Genes dev. 2001, 15 (2): 213-225. 10.1101/gad.851501.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sirbu IO, Gresh L, Barra J, Duester G: Shifting boundaries of retinoic acid activity control hindbrain segmental gene expression. Development. 2005, 132 (11): 2611-2622. 10.1242/dev.01845.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Swindell EC, Thaller C, Sockanathan S, Petkovich M, Jessell TM, Eichele G: Complementary domains of retinoic acid production and degradation in the early chick embryo. Dev Biol. 1999, 216 (1): 282-296. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Brand N, Petkovich M, Krust A, Chambon P, de The H, Marchio A, Tiollais P, Dejean A: Identification of a second human retinoic acid receptor. Nature. 1988, 332 (6167): 850-853. 10.1038/332850a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. de The H, Marchio A, Tiollais P, Dejean A: A novel steroid thyroid hormone receptor-related gene inappropriately expressed in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature. 1987, 330 (6149): 667-670. 10.1038/330667a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Petkovich M, Brand NJ, Krust A, Chambon P: A human retinoic acid receptor which belongs to the family of nuclear receptors. Nature. 1987, 330 (6147): 444-450. 10.1038/330444a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gould A, Morrison A, Sproat G, White RA, Krumlauf R: Positive cross-regulation and enhancer sharing: two mechanisms for specifying overlapping Hox expression patterns. Genes dev. 1997, 11 (7): 900-913. 10.1101/gad.11.7.900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Popperl H, Bienz M, Studer M, Chan SK, Aparicio S, Brenner S, Mann RS, Krumlauf R: Segmental expression of Hoxb-1 is controlled by a highly conserved autoregulatory loop dependent upon exd/pbx. Cell. 1995, 81 (7): 1031-1042. 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80008-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Maurus D, Harris WA: Zic-associated holoprosencephaly: zebrafish Zic1 controls midline formation and forebrain patterning by regulating Nodal, Hedgehog, and retinoic acid signaling. Genes dev. 2009, 23 (12): 1461-1473. 10.1101/gad.517009.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Brown LY, Odent S, David V, Blayau M, Dubourg C, Apacik C, Delgado MA, Hall BD, Reynolds JF, Sommer A, et al: Holoprosencephaly due to mutations in ZIC2: alanine tract expansion mutations may be caused by parental somatic recombination. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10 (8): 791-796. 10.1093/hmg/10.8.791.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Brown SA, Warburton D, Brown LY, Yu CY, Roeder ER, Stengel-Rutkowski S, Hennekam RC, Muenke M: Holoprosencephaly due to mutations in ZIC2, a homologue of Drosophila odd-paired. Nat Genet. 1998, 20 (2): 180-183. 10.1038/2484.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gripp KW, Wotton D, Edwards MC, Roessler E, Ades L, Meinecke P, Richieri-Costa A, Zackai EH, Massague J, Muenke M, et al: Mutations in TGIF cause holoprosencephaly and link NODAL signalling to human neural axis determination. Nat Genet. 2000, 25 (2): 205-208. 10.1038/76074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wallis DE, Muenke M: Molecular mechanisms of holoprosencephaly. Mol Genet Metab. 1999, 68 (2): 126-138. 10.1006/mgme.1999.2895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Begemann G, Schilling TF, Rauch GJ, Geisler R, Ingham PW: The zebrafish neckless mutation reveals a requirement for raldh2 in mesodermal signals that pattern the hindbrain. Development. 2001, 128 (16): 3081-3094.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Linville A, Gumusaneli E, Chandraratna RA, Schilling TF: Independent roles for retinoic acid in segmentation and neuronal differentiation in the zebrafish hindbrain. Dev Biol. 2004, 270 (1): 186-199. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.02.022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Dobbs-McAuliffe B, Zhao Q, Linney E: Feedback mechanisms regulate retinoic acid production and degradation in the zebrafish embryo. Mech Dev. 2004, 121 (4): 339-350. 10.1016/j.mod.2004.02.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Emoto Y, Wada H, Okamoto H, Kudo A, Imai Y: Retinoic acid-metabolizing enzyme Cyp26a1 is essential for determining territories of hindbrain and spinal cord in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2005, 278 (2): 415-427. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Elsen GE, Choi LY, Millen KJ, Grinblat Y, Prince VE: Zic1 and Zic4 regulate zebrafish roof plate specification and hindbrain ventricle morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2008, 314 (2): 376-392. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.12.006.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Grinblat Y, Sive H: zic Gene expression marks anteroposterior pattern in the presumptive neurectoderm of the zebrafish gastrula. Dev dyn off publ American Assoc Anatomists. 2001, 222 (4): 688-693.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Nyholm MK, Abdelilah-Seyfried S, Grinblat Y: A novel genetic mechanism regulates dorsolateral hinge-point formation during zebrafish cranial neurulation. J cell sci. 2009, 122 (Pt 12): 2137-2148.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Feng L, Hernandez RE, Waxman JS, Yelon D, Moens CB: Dhrs3a regulates retinoic acid biosynthesis through a feedback inhibition mechanism. Dev Biol. 2010, 338 (1): 1-14. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.029.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Waxman JS, Yelon D: Zebrafish retinoic acid receptors function as context-dependent transcriptional activators. Dev Biol. 2011, 352 (1): 128-140. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.01.022.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Higashijima S, Hotta Y, Okamoto H: Visualization of cranial motor neurons in live transgenic zebrafish expressing green fluorescent protein under the control of the islet-1 promoter/enhancer. J Neurosci. 2000, 20 (1): 206-218.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Maden M, Sonneveld E, van der Saag PT, Gale E: The distribution of endogenous retinoic acid in the chick embryo: implications for developmental mechanisms. Development. 1998, 125 (21): 4133-4144.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ohishi K, Nishikawa S, Nagata T, Yamauchi N, Shinohara H, Kido J, Ishida H: Physiological concentrations of retinoic acid suppress the osteoblastic differentiation of fetal rat calvaria cells in vitro. Eur j endocrinol Eur Fed Endocr Soc. 1995, 133 (3): 335-341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Vitobello A, Ferretti E, Lampe X, Vilain N, Ducret S, Ori M, Spetz JF, Selleri L, Rijli FM: Hox and Pbx factors control retinoic acid synthesis during hindbrain segmentation. Dev Cell. 2011, 20 (4): 469-482. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.011.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gongal PA, March LD, Holly VL, Pillay LM, Berry-Wynne KM, Kagechika H, Waskiewicz AJ: Hmx4 regulates Sonic hedgehog signaling through control of retinoic acid synthesis during forebrain patterning. Dev Biol. 2011, 355 (1): 55-64. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.04.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Westerfield M: The zebrafish book. A guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Danio rerio), 4th edition edn. 2000, Eugene, OR: Univ. of Oregon Press

    Google Scholar 

  69. Nyholm MK, Wu SF, Dorsky RI, Grinblat Y: The zebrafish zic2a-zic5 gene pair acts downstream of canonical Wnt signaling to control cell proliferation in the developing tectum. Development. 2007, 134 (4): 735-746. 10.1242/dev.02756.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Alexa K, Choe SK, Hirsch N, Etheridge L, Laver E, Sagerstrom CG: Maternal and zygotic aldh1a2 activity is required for pancreas development in zebrafish. PloS one. 2009, 4 (12): e8261-10.1371/journal.pone.0008261.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kudoh T, Wilson SW, Dawid IB: Distinct roles for Fgf, Wnt and retinoic acid in posteriorizing the neural ectoderm. Development. 2002, 129 (18): 4335-4346.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Robu ME, Larson JD, Nasevicius A, Beiraghi S, Brenner C, Farber SA, Ekker SC: p53 activation by knockdown technologies. PLoS genetics. 2007, 3 (5): e78-10.1371/journal.pgen.0030078.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Thisse C, Thisse B: High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos. Nat Protoc. 2008, 3 (1): 59-69. 10.1038/nprot.2007.514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25 (4): 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Pillay LM, Forrester AM, Erickson T, Berman JN, Waskiewicz AJ: The Hox cofactors Meis1 and Pbx act upstream of gata1 to regulate primitive hematopoiesis. Dev Biol. 2010, 340 (2): 306-317. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.01.033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by an operating grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) award to AJW. Additional funding was obtained from Research, Scholarly Activity and Creative Achievement Fund (internal award from MacEwan University) awarded to LBP. DLD was the recipient of a Banting and Best scholarship from CIHR. LGS is the recipient of a Canadian Graduate Scholarship-Master’s Award (NSERC). JCH is the recipient of an Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions postdoctoral fellowship. AJW is the recipient of a Canada Research Chair Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, CW405, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada

    Danna L Drummond, Caroline S Cheng, Lyndsay G Selland, Jennifer C Hocking & Andrew J Waskiewicz

  2. Department of Biological Sciences, MacEwan University, Edmonton, Canada

    Lisa B Prichard

  3. Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

    Andrew J Waskiewicz

  4. Women & Children’s Health Research Institute, Edmonton, Canada

    Andrew J Waskiewicz

Authors
  1. Danna L Drummond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Caroline S Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lyndsay G Selland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jennifer C Hocking
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lisa B Prichard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andrew J Waskiewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J Waskiewicz.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

DLD conducted the studies of zic expression, morpholino knockdown, and analysis of retinoic acid signaling. CSC conducted studies of zic expression and assisted with writing the manuscript. LGS assisted with writing the manuscript and performed control experiments. JCH performed the JB-4 sectioning, helped with data analysis and edited the manuscript. LBP conducted studies of Zic function in regulating ocular retinoic acid levels and wrote the manuscript. AJW conceived of the study, participated in its design and wrote portions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drummond, D.L., Cheng, C.S., Selland, L.G. et al. The role of Zic transcription factors in regulating hindbrain retinoic acid signaling. BMC Dev Biol 13, 31 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-13-31

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-13-31

Keywords

BMC Developmental Biology

ISSN: 1471-213X

Contact us