- Research article
- Open Access
GATA4/FOG2 transcriptional complex regulates Lhx9 gene expression in murine heart development
© Smagulova et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
- Received: 16 November 2007
- Accepted: 24 June 2008
- Published: 24 June 2008
GATA4 and FOG2 proteins are required for normal cardiac development in mice. It has been proposed that GATA4/FOG2 transcription complex exercises its function through gene activation as well as repression; however, targets of GATA4/FOG2 action in the heart remain elusive.
Here we report identification of the Lhx9 gene as a direct target of the GATA4/FOG2 complex. We demonstrate that the developing mouse heart normally expresses truncated isoforms of Lhx9 – Lhx9α and Lhx9β, and not the Lhx9-HD isoform that encodes a protein with an intact homeodomain. At E9.5 Lhx9α/β expression is prominent in the epicardial primordium, septum transversum while Lhx9-HD is absent from this tissue; in the E11.5 heart LHX9α/β-positive cells are restricted to the epicardial mesothelium. Thereafter in the control hearts Lhx9α/β epicardial expression is promptly down-regulated; in contrast, mouse mutants with Fog2 gene loss fail to repress Lhx9α/β expression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation from the E11.5 hearts demonstrated that Lhx9 is a direct target for GATA4 and FOG2. In transient transfection studies the expression driven by the cis-regulatory regions of Lhx9 was repressed by FOG2 in the presence of intact GATA4, but not the GATA4ki mutant that is impaired in its ability to bind FOG2.
In summary, the Lhx9 gene represents the first direct target of the GATA4/FOG2 repressor complex in cardiac development.
- Cardiac Development
- Embryonic Heart
- Septum Transversum
- Epicardial Cell
- Cardiac Expression
Unlike many developing organs that remain dormant until the time of birth, a properly functioning embryonic heart is essential for embryo survival. Hence, defects in cardiac function are a common cause for embryonic lethality. Gene targeting in mice revealed multiple genes that are required for cardiac development and function; however, the interplay between these genes often remains a mystery. This is especially true for genes encoding for transcription factors which are expressed in a dynamic fashion in various cellular compartments that constitute the developing heart.
Friend of GATA, member 2 gene (FOG2, ZFPM2 – Mouse Genome Informatics) is prominently expressed in multiple cell types that constitute the embryonic heart . To examine the function for FOG2 in cardiac development gene-targeted mice have been generated . Fog2-/- (null) embryos die at mid-gestation (~E13.5) with a cardiac defect characterized by an atrial septal defect, thin ventricular myocardium, common atrioventricular (AV) canal and the Tetralogy of Fallot malformation. Of particular additional interest is the finding that the development of cardiac vasculature was blocked in Fog2-/- mice. Despite the apparently normal formation of an intact epicardial layer and expression of epicardium-specific genes in Fog2 null mutants, markers of cardiac vessel development (ICAM-2 and KDR) are not detected, indicative of failure to activate their expression and/or to initiate the epithelial to mesenchymal transformation of epicardial cells [2, 3]. These results are particularly insightful with respect to KDR, since KDR (FLK1, VEGFR2), the major receptor for VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), is an important marker of vascular cells and is absolutely essential for vascular development (e.g. , see  for a review).
Although gene targeting revealed the requirement for FOG2 in multiple aspects of cardiac development, the specific genetic program (or programs) downstream of FOG2 remained unknown. Research by us and others established that multi-type zinc-finger proteins of the FOG family (FOG1, FOG2, xFOG and dUSH) control biological activities of GATA transcription factors (for review, see [6, 7]). Based on the results from the hematopoietic system it has been suggested that FOG proteins serve as co-factors for GATA family members by forming a GATA/FOG complex on specific GATA sites. Indeed, differentially regulated genes have been identified for GATA1-FOG1 complex vs. GATA1 alone in blood development (e.g. . Furthermore, these studies demonstrated that FOG1 could stimulate or inhibit GATA1 activity depending on cell and promoter context . For example, FOG1 stimulates GATA1 activity on the p45 NF-E2 gene promoter, which is active in erythroid cells and megakaryocytes ; however, it represses GATA1 activity on the erythroid-specific Eklf and transferrin receptor II promoters, as well as on a synthetic GATA1-dependent promoter [11, 12]
Earlier studies aimed at the similar characterization of the GATA4-FOG2 relationship with respect to cardiac development relied on transient transfection assays with well-characterized Anf, Bnp and α-Mhc promoters that contain GATA sites [13, 14]. However, these genes are normally expressed in mutant Fog2 null or Gata4 ki/ki hearts (the V217G Gata4 mutation  which specifically cripples the interaction between GATA4 and FOG proteins) arguing against the essential role for GATA4/FOG2 complex in their regulation [2, 15, 16]. Hence, transcriptional targets of GATA4/FOG2 complex in the heart are currently unknown.
The cardiac Gata4 ki/ki phenotype showed numerous similarities to the Fog2 null heart underscoring the role for GATA4/FOG2 protein complex in cardiac gene regulation . However, the mode of GATA4/FOG2 action, as a repressor or activator, remains unclear and necessitates identification of its downstream targets. In order to identify the targets of GATA4/FOG2 action in the mammalian heart we performed several Affymetrix microarray comparisons of gene expression in normal and mutant E13.5 hearts. As many groups have identified the regions in FOG proteins that mediate their function as GATA co-repressors [17–22], we expected that gene up-regulation (de-repression) should be, at least partially, responsible for causing cardiac syndrome in the GATA4/FOG2 mutants.
Here we describe one of the targets of GATA4/FOG2 complex in its transcriptional repressor role, Lhx9 gene. LHX9 belongs to the family of the LIM-HD (LIM-homeodomain) proteins. The roles for the majority of LIM-HD encoding genes have been mostly defined in the context of nervous system development where they act to specify neuronal identities of post-mitotic neurons (reviewed in ). LIM-HD genes act in a context-dependent fashion, cooperating with other factors to establish enormous diversity of the nervous system . The function for LHX9 was proposed in the development of the nervous system as this gene is prominently expressed in the motoneurons of the spinal cord and in the developing brain [25–28]. Despite this prominent neuronal expression pattern, knockout of Lhx9 in mice did not affect animal viability or neuronal development probably reflecting a redundancy of Lhx9 and its close structural relative, Lhx2 ; unexpectedly, the knockout revealed a requirement for Lxh9 in early gonad formation . Our studies demonstrate that GATA4/FOG2 transcription complex regulates Lhx9 cardiac expression and suggest that the role for Lhx9 in the development of the heart should be evaluated.
Cardiac expression of the Lhx9gene splicing isoforms
In order to identify the targets of GATA4/FOG2 action in mammalian heart development we performed an Affymetrix microarray comparison of gene expression in normal and Fog2 null E13.5 hearts. The microarray profiling yielded surprisingly few genes that were differentially (~2.5 times up- or down-regulated) expressed in the mutant samples vs. controls (Additional File 1 and data not shown). Importantly, the probe set corresponding to the Fog2 gene deletion was absent in the Fog2 null sample, as was expected.
We also confirmed that a full-length isoform (Lhx9-HD) is scarcely detectable in the embryonic heart even when measured by a highly sensitive real time PCR assay. The cardiac expression level of Lhx9-HD is ~30 times (at E11.5; not shown) and ~50 times (at E13.5; Fig 2D) lower than that of Lhx9α/β; this data is in agreement with the previous work . In contrast and as a positive control we detected Lhx9-HD using the same primer pair as robustly expressed in the E11.5 embryonic hind limb where its levels were ~33 times higher than in the E11.5 heart (Fig 2E); in the hind limb Lhx9-HD expression was only slightly lower (~3.3 times) than Lhx9α/β expression (Fig 2F) (see also Fig 5 for in situ hybridization analysis).
Lhx9is a target of the GATA4/FOG2 transcriptional complex
To further compare the expression of Lhx9 in the control and Fog2 mutant cardiac samples we performed in situ whole-mount hybridization experiments using an anti-Lhx9 RNA probe that detects both isoforms (α/β). In the wild-type E11.5 heart the ventricles, the atrioventricular groove and the outflow tract are weakly positive for Lhx9α/β expression, while in the Fog2 null heart Lhx9α/β expression is strongly enhanced (Fig 3C–D). By E12.5 and especially by E13.5 Lhx9α/β expression appears almost extinguished in the control heart, while the Fog2 mutant sample is strongly positive for Lhx9α/β (Fig 3E–H). These results correlate well with the real-time PCR data (Fig 2B and Fig 3A–B). The non-cardiac expression of Lhx9α/β (e.g. spinal cord, limb buds and testes) remains comparable in the control and mutant embryos (Fig 5 and Additional File 2A, B; also data not shown).
LHX9α/βis localized to the epicardium in the fetal heart
To establish the identity of cardiac cells that express Lhx9α/β we sectioned the stained hearts following the RNA in situ hybridization. As Lhx9α/β expression in the wild-type heart is low, we analyzed the mutant samples. We observed that Lhx9α/β expression is restricted to the outermost layer of the heart (not shown). To ensure that this staining is not a result of a poor probe penetration, we sectioned the wild-type and mutant E11.5 hearts and performed immunofluorescent analysis with an anti-LHX9 antibody. Among several antibodies we have tested (data not shown) only one  was suitable for the immunofluorescence analysis of embryonic samples. In addition to LHX9α/β this anti-LHX2/9 antibody recognizes both LHX2 and LHX9-HD; however, RNA species encoding both of these proteins are absent (i.e. Lhx9-HD (Fig 2D, E and ; Lhx2 ) from the E11.5 embryonic heart.
To label the cells in the epicardial region at this early stage in epicardial development we used an antibody specific for the endothelial integral membrane glycoprotein endoglin (ENG)  that recognizes epicardial cells that are already committed to the endothelial lineage both in the control and in Fog2 mutant hearts . At E11.5 the epicardial layer containing LHX9α/β-positive cells is still negative for ENG, while at E12.5 stage this endothelial marker starts to detect some (but not all) ventricular cells in the epicardial and sub-epicardial layer. We concluded that in the embryonic heart LHX9 α/β proteins are temporarily expressed in the developing epicardial cell layer. Although the majority of the LHX9-positive cells are confined to the epicardium, a weaker immunoreactivity is detectable in the myocardium (Fig 4) suggesting that a low level expression of LHX9α/β could be present in these cells.
Lhx9α/β and Lhx2, but not Lhx9-HDare expressed in the proepicardium
Expression of the Lhx9 homologue, Lhx2, in the septum transversum (STM) has been previously reported ; however, we noted that the authors in their analysis used a probe that corresponds to the whole-length Lhx2 cDNA (NM_010710; nucleotides 460–1750). A sequence comparison revealed two large regions of almost complete identity between the Lhx2 probe sequence and Lhx9; hence, we believe the authors  could not discriminate between Lhx2 and Lhx9 in their in situ assay. To distinguish between these homologues we designed an Lhx2 probe that is limited to the most 5'-region of the Lhx2 sequence (NM_010710; nucleotides 42 to 488) and has no homology to Lhx9; we also generated an in situ probe that is specific for Lhx9-HD. We detected an Lhx2 transcript in the STM (Fig 5A, middle panels). In contrast, the transcript corresponding to the full-length Lhx9-HD could not be detected in the STM (Fig 5A, bottom panels); this rules out the transient role for the Lhx9-HD transcript in the STM. We detected no STM up-regulation of either Lhx2 or Lhx9α/β in the absence of Fog2; if anything, it appears that both Lhx9 α/β and Lhx2 could be expressed slightly lower in the STM of Fog2 mutants (e.g. Fig 5A, insets in top panels).
We have previously shown that transgenic expression of Fog2 (restricted to the myocardium with an Mhc promoter) extends the life of the otherwise Fog2-null embryos; however this rescue by myocardial-derived Fog2 is incomplete [2, 46]. If Lhx9α/β expression is mostly confined to the epicardium and directly regulated there by a FOG2 protein, myocardially-driven FOG2 should not be able to repress Lhx9α/β expression back to its original low level. To test this we examined Lhx9α/β expression in the control and 'rescued' αMhc-FOG2/Fog2-/- hearts at E14.5. Rescued hearts preserved a high level of Lhx9α/β compared to the control indirectly attesting to the fact that myocardial Fog2 is not primarily responsible for regulating Lhx9α/β expression (Fig 5B). This finding prompted us to examine whether FOG2 could be directly regulating Lhx9α/β expression as described below.
Lhx9is a direct target of GATA4/FOG2 repression complex in the heart
GATA4 and FOG2 cooperate to inhibit Lhx9promoters
To confirm that the GATA-harboring DNA sequences upstream of the Lhx9 transcriptional start sites are essential for GATA4/FOG2-dependent regulation we performed luciferase reporter assays. Lhx9 regulatory sequences containing ECRs with ChIPed GATA sites (-4968/-4301 and -1121/+1; Fig 6A) were isolated and used to generate luciferase reporter constructs. The reporter constructs were transiently transfected into the 293 HEK cells along with the GATA4 and FOG2 expression vectors. We also generated a GATA4ki expression vector (encoding for the V217G mutation in GATA4 that does not interact with FOG2 ). The wild-type GATA4 cooperates with FOG2 to repress Lhx9 promoter-driven luciferase expression while the mutant GATA4ki version of GATA4 is severely impaired in this repression assay (Fig 6E, F). A luciferase construct containing a GAAA mutation in the (-521) GATA element was not co-repressed by a joint GATA4/FOG2 action (Fig 6E). We conclude that the repression of Lhx9 gene expression in the developing heart requires the presence of the functional GATA4/FOG2 protein complex.
LHX9α and LHX9β interact with ISL1, but not CITED2
ISL1 and LHX2/LHX9 are co-expressed in the developing liver, but not epicardium or septum transversum
Recent evidence suggests that different splicing isoforms of the same transcription factor may have competing/opposing as well as unrelated roles in cellular differentiation (e.g., [52–54]). We have demonstrated that GATA4/FOG2 transcription complex is essential for the repression of Lhx9 gene transcription in cardiac development; we have also determined that the Lhx9 isoform encoding for the protein with intact homeodomain is not present in the embryonic heart, while both α and β isoforms encoding a truncated homeodomain are expressed. This differential expression of Lhx9 isoforms suggests that truncated LHX9 proteins have a separate function independent of the full-length LHX9 molecule. This assertion is supported by the previously reported observation that LHX9 isoforms do not directly compete with each other and instead function in different pathways during neuronal differentiation .
One of the objectives of this study was to identify the downstream targets of GATA4/FOG2 regulation in various sub-compartments of the developing heart and to understand how the mis-regulation of these targets contributes to severe cardiac defects in Fog2-null and Gata4 ki/ki embryos. We have now determined that Lhx9α/β is a target of GATA4/FOG2 repression, with wild-type hearts down-regulating Lhx9α/β epicardial expression starting at least on E11.5, while hearts deficient in FOG2 fail to do so (Fig 3). The inability of the Fog2-null heart to down-regulate Lhx9α/β expression may be a contributing factor in the constellation of the cardiac abnormalities caused by Fog2 deficiency . Although this study mostly focused on the Fog2 mutants, real-time PCR analysis with the E12.5 Gata4 ki/ki hearts  also revealed a significant, albeit weaker, up-regulation of the Lhx9α/β gene expression in this mutant (~3 times; data not shown). This more modest up-regulation in the Gata4 ki mutant could be due to partial compensation by the other Gata family member, Gata6, that is expressed in the developing heart.
We also demonstrated here that Lhx9α/β expression is initiated in the septum transversum (Fig 5) and that these are the epicardial cells that continue expressing LHX9α/β in E11.5 hearts and downregulate this expression shortly thereafter. Further experiments will confirm whether LHX9-positive epicardial cells are direct descendants of the septum transversum cells. The requirement to down-regulate Lhx9 expression is no longer satisfied in the epicardium of the Fog2-null mutant hearts (Fig 3). We propose that abnormally high level of Lhx9 gene expression that is characteristic of an earlier stage in epicardial cell development is likely to be a contributing factor in the impaired differentiation of the epicardially derived cells in the Fog2 mutant embryos .
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) confirmed the roles of the two evolutionary conserved GATA sites in Lhx9 gene cis-regulatory elements. Since DNA complexes were precipitating with either anti-GATA4 or anti-FOG2 antibodies, this assay demonstrated that in the E11.5 heart these sites are occupied by the GATA4/FOG2 complex rather than GATA4 alone. We could no longer detect GATA4/FOG2 complex binding to these sites in the E14.5 hearts (not shown) suggesting that Lhx9 repression at this later stage of cardiac development is likely to be GATA4/FOG2-independent. In agreement with the ChiP data, luciferase reporter assays confirmed the cooperative repression by GATA4 and FOG2 (Fig 6E, F). Although GATA sites have been previously identified in the proximal promoters of Anf, Bnp and α-Mhc genes, these genes' expression is not affected by the GATA4/FOG2 interaction loss. It is possible that other transcription factors regulating Lhx9 expression ensure the selectivity of GATA4/FOG2 binding; however, computer analysis of ECRs harboring GATA sites did not reveal sequence conservation for any other transcription factors in these regions. Lhx9 gene expression is restricted to a limited number of tissues during development and is likely to be tightly regulated (e.g. [26, 27, 31]). Transcriptional regulation of Lhx9 is not well understood and the crosstalk between the (yet unknown) activators of Lhx9 expression and its repressors, GATA4/FOG2, remains to be elucidated. In this respect we also cannot exclude the contribution of an indirect regulation mechanism where GATA4/FOG2 would normally activate a yet unknown repressor X of Lhx9 transcription; Fog2 loss in this case will result in down-regulation of X and de-repression of Lhx9. In summary, although our ChIPs as well as transient transfection data argues in favor of a direct repression mechanism, it is possible that, once other trans-acting factors governing Lhx9 regulation are uncovered, they will be also deregulated in the Fog2 knockout.
We have previously shown that transgenic expression of Fog2 restricted to the myocardium with αMhc promoter extends the life of the otherwise Fog2-null embryos; however this rescue by myocardial-derived Fog2 is incomplete [2, 46]. In this respect, increased level of Lhx9 expression still persists in the E14.5 hearts of the 'rescued' αMhc-Fog2/Fog2-/-mutants (Fig 5B) indirectly attesting to the fact that myocardial Fog2 is not responsible for regulating Lhx9α/β expression. It is likely that the inability to down-regulate Lhx9 in the epicardium is, at least partially, responsible for the incomplete rescue in the αMhc-Fog2/Fog2-/- mutants. Importantly, in a sensitive qRT-PCR the level of Lhx9 expression in αMhc-Fog2/Fog2-/- hearts was slightly reduced (not shown) suggesting that a low level myocardial Lhx9/LHX9 expression is present and controlled by GATA4/FOG2.
Loss of GATA4/FOG2 interaction has a profound early effect on testis differentiation ; similarly, the Lhx9 gene is expressed in the developing gonads and Lhx9 gene targeting that removes two exons encoding for the LIM domains results in an early gonadal defect . However, in contrast to the situation in cardiac development, we do not observe an up-regulation of Lhx9 gene expression in the gonads of GATA4/FOG2 mutants (e.g., Additional File 2) suggesting that GATA4 and FOG2 do not control Lhx9 in this tissue.
Currently, the function of LIM-HD factors in cardiac development (with the notable exception of ISL1) is not well understood. Computer analysis of gene expression database (as well as our own microarray analysis, data not shown) shows that Lhx6 is the only other member of the Lhx family that is expressed in the developing heart in the amount comparable to Lhx9α/β; no cardiac defect for Lhx6 loss of function has been reported .
Our data confirms and extends the previous observation that Lhx9 splicing isoforms are expressed in a tissue-specific manner . We also demonstrated that these truncated Lhx9 transcripts lead to the expression of the protein; this is an important confirmation since an appearance of an RNA encoding for a regulatory factor does not always correlate with protein accumulation (e.g. Myf5 RNA and not the protein are expressed in neurons ). It was proposed that Lhx9α encodes for a protein with a truncated HD that can compete with LHX9 (or other LIM-HD factors) for limited amounts of nuclear CLIM cofactors like Ldb1 ; Ldb1 knockout animals do not develop heart anlage . CLIM cofactors can dimerize and interact with two LIM-HD proteins at the same time ([48, 59]; reviewed in ). In addition to the simple sequestration of Ldb1, the adjustment of stoichiometry between various CLIM-LHX complexes can involve differential degradation of some, but not other complexes [61, 62]. Finally, one of the consequences of the excessive LHX9α/β-Ldb1 complex formation could be 'trapping' of cardiac LHX factors with their interacting proteins into non-functional LHX9 α/β-containing complexes. Our IP-Western analysis demonstrated that both LHX9α and LHXβ could interact with other LIM-HD proteins such as ISL1 (Fig 7), suggesting that LHX9 α/β could function in mammalian cells as part of the multi-protein complexes. The ISL1 protein, however, is unlikely to serve as a partner for LHX9α/β in the epicardium or septum transversum as cells expressing LHX2/9 in these tissues do not express ISL1 (Fig 8).
In summary, our data suggest that the function of the LHX9α/β protein during the proepicardial development should be evaluated. This function maybe masked by other Lhx family members or by unrelated compensatory mechanisms and hence not revealed in the Lhx9-null animals . We also provide evidence that GATA4/FOG2 regulate Lhx9 gene expression directly through binding to the evolutionary conserved GATA sites in the Lhx9 regulatory regions. The loss of GATA4/FOG2 interaction leads to de-repression of the LHX9α/β expression in epicardial cells; this abnormally high expression may account for some of the cardiac malformations observed in the Gata4 ki/ki and Fog2 null mutants.
LHX9 belongs to the family of the LIM-HD (LIM-homeodomain) transcription factors. We have now determined that the developing mouse heart normally expresses truncated isoforms of Lhx9 – Lhx9α and Lhx9β. Whereas, the expression of the Lhx9 isoform that encodes a protein with an intact homeodomain is extremely low. At E9.5 Lhx9α/β expression is prominent in the epicardial primordium, septum transversum; in the E11.5 heart LHX9-positive cells are localized to the epicardial mesothelium. Thereafter in the control hearts Lhx9α/β epicardial expression is promptly down-regulated; in contrast, mouse mutants with Fog2 gene loss fail to repress Lhx9α/β expression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation from the E11.5 hearts established the roles of the two evolutionary conserved GATA sites in Lhx9 gene cis-regulatory elements. In transient transfection studies the expression driven by the cis-regulatory regions of Lhx9 was repressed by FOG2 in the presence of intact GATA4, but not the GATA4 ki mutant that is impaired in its ability to bind FOG2. This study identifies the first direct target for the GATA4/FOG2 repressor complex in the heart, Lhx9α/β.
Mouse strains and genotyping
Previously described Fog2+/-  and Gataki/+  animals were bred onto a pure C57Bl/6 background (a kind gift of Dr. Eva Eicher, Jackson laboratory); αMhc-Fog2 animals have been previously described [2, 46]. Mice were genotyped by PCR using genomic DNA prepared from tail snips. Fog2- null and wild-type alleles were distinguished by PCR using the following primers:
F2gen12: GCTCCAGACTGCCTTGGGAAAAG; F2gen13: CCACAGCAAGAGAACATTTCCCAGAATACC, F2gen14 GCTGCATGTGATGAGCAATAAAACTTCTTG; GATA4 knock-in allele was detected as described previously  by using primers GkiF TGCGGAAGGAGGGGATTCAAAC and GkiR TCTGAGAGAACTGAGGGGGTTAGC. The presence of the αMhc-Fog2 transgene was determined by using primers FP7 AGCGAGCGGAACCTGCAAG and FP9 TGTAGTTACAGACCGTGCA. All animal protocols have been approved by the Dartmouth Animal Care and Use Committee.
The total RNA from control and mutant (Fog2 null) E13.5 hearts was applied to Affymetrix microarray (Dartmouth Genomic and Microarray laboratory); microarray data was analyzed using the Gene Traffic (Iobion Informatics) program.
pCS2+Gata4 and pCS2+Fog2 were previously described . To generate the pCS2+ Gata4ki mutant vector we introduced the V217G mutation  by PCR using the following primers: GCAGAGAGTGTGGCAATTGTGG (forward) and CCACAATTGCCACACTCTCTGC (reverse).
pCS2+HA_Lhx9α. The full-length cDNA (993 bps) encoding for the LHX9α isoform was generated from the total cDNA prepared from E11.5 embryonic hearts using the First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen). The PCR fragment corresponding to the Lhx9a cDNA was generated with the following primers: Lhx9α-FL_BamHI-F GGATCCCAATGGAAATAGTGGGGTGCCGAGCC and reverse Lhx9α-FL-XhoI-R 5'-CTCGAGTAAGGGAATTTTCAAACGTCGGGAT. An insert was isolated by the BamHI/XhoI digest and cloned into the pCS2+ vector containing a HA tag (unpublished).
pCMV5a-Isl1α_FLAG and pCMV5a-Isl1β_FLAG plasmids were generated essentially as described above for pCS2+HA_Lhx9α. PCR fragments corresponding to the full-length Isl1α (1050 bp) or Isl1β (981 bp) cDNAs were generated using the following primers Isl1_FL_BamHI_F 5'-GGATCCATGGGAGACATGGGCGATCC and reverse Isl1_FL_BglII_R 5'-AGATCTTGATGCCTCAATAGGACTGGCTA; inserts corresponding to both isoforms were excised with BamHI/BglII and cloned into a pCMV5a vector containing the C-terminal FLAG tag (Sigma).
pCMV5a-Cited2_FLAG was generated using a commercially available plasmid (IMAGE clone 6415181; Open Biosystems) as a template. A PCR fragment corresponding to the full length Cited2 cDNA (810 bps) was obtained with the following primers: Cited2-fl-BamHIF 5'-GGATCCATGGCAGACCATATGATGGCCATGAA and reverse Cited2-fl-BglII-R 5'-AGATCTTGAACAGCTGACTCTGCTGGGCTGC; an insert was excised with BamHI/BglII and cloned into pCMV5a.
pGL3_lhx9_1121 and pGL3_lhx9_1121Gm: The promoter region (bps -1121 to -1 from the ATG codon of the Lhx9α isoform) was isolated by PCR using genomic DNA from CJ7 ES cells as a template. The following primers were used: Lhx9_1121_KpnI-F GGTACCTTCACTTTGGTGGACGTCTCAGAGC (forward; a KpnI site is underlined) and Lhx9_1121_NcoI-R CCATGGAAACACACGCCTGGGGCTCTCAGTT (reverse; a NcoI site is underlined). A PCR-generated fragment was cloned into the pSC-A vector (Stratagene); KpnI/NcoI fragment containing the Lhx9 gene fragment was isolated and inserted into pGL3_Basic vector (Promega) containing the luciferase reporter gene. The mutant version of this promoter, 1121Gm, disrupted a GATA site positioned at -521 upstream from the ATG codone. The following primers were used to insert a mutation: CTCCTACTAAATTTTCAAAAATGG (forward) and CCATTTTTGAAAATTTAGTAGGAG (reverse); the TATC/GATA site was replaced with the TTTC/GAAA sequence (the altered sequence is underlined).
pGL3_SV40_lhx9_938: The enhancer region from -4968 to -4031 bp upstream of the ATG codon of the Lhx9β isoform was isolated by PCR essentially as described above. The following primers were used: Lhx9_938_KpnI-F GGTACCTCCATATGGCCAAGTCAATGTGA (forward; a KpnI site is underlined) and Lhx9_938_NcoI-R CCATGGTGAGCAGCAGCTTCCTGTTACTG (reverse; a NcoI site is underlined). A PCR-generated fragment was introduced into the pGL3_SV40 vector (Promega) containing the luciferase reporter gene and the minimal SV40 promoter.
The PCR fragments incorporated into DNA constructs were verified by sequencing.
Total RNA extraction
Hearts (both ventricles and atria) were dissected from the embryos and preserved in RNAlater (Ambion) until further use. Hearts were disrupted by forcing the tissue through a 26 gauge needle. Total RNA was prepared using RNAeasy columns (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. On average 1.5–2 μg of total RNA was obtained from one E13.5 heart. RNA concentration was determined by measuring absorbance at 260 nm; RNA was stored at -80°C. Hind limb RNA was prepared following essentially the same protocol, except that no shredding of the tissue was necessary.
Quantitative Real Time RT-PCR
cDNA was prepared from 1–2 μgs of total cardiac RNA with a First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR was performed using a PCR SYBR Green I Kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions in a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system machine and a standard amplification protocol was established for each gene. Calibration curves were generated essentially as described before . Values from at least three independent experiments were compared; standard deviation was calculated using Excel (Microsoft) application.
forward 5'♦ 3'
reverse 5'♦ 3'
Whole-mount in situ hybridization
The 504 bps Lhx9α/β probe corresponds to the 3'-untranslated region of mouse Lhx9 RNA, +1146 to +1650 from the ATG codone . The probe region was amplified by PCR using total cardiac E11.5 cDNA as a template with the following primers: lhx9-1146-F GAGTGAGACATAAGTGTCATT (forward) and the lhx9-1650-R AATGTTTGCATCAAATAAAATG (reverse). The 517 bps Lhx9-HD probe corresponds to the + 1054 to +1571 from the ATG codone of the isoform encoding for the HD-containing protein (NM_001042577;  of Lhx9; the region was amplified using the primers: lhx9-1054-F: CTCTCACTCCACCCGGCACTG and lhx9-1571-R: AGGAATATAATTCGCCCATCGTAAT. Finally, the 466 bps Lhx2 probe corresponded to the 5'-region (-425 to +21 from the ATG codone) of Lhx2 (NM_010710); the primers used were lhx2-425F: CACCTAGCTGTTCCTGGGTGAAC and lhx2-21R: CCGACAGACTGTGGAACAGCATC. The PCR fragments were cloned into the pSC-A vector (Stratagene) and the digoxigenin-labelled RNA probes were generated according to standard procedures . In situ hybridization and staining were performed as previously described . For each embryonic (E) time point at least two independent experiments were done. Stained hearts or embryos were re-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, washed and kept in PBS. Images were acquired, processed and mounted as previously described .
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
Sequence F5'♦ 3'F
Sequence F5'♦ 3'R
PCR products were recovered from agarose gels and their nucleotide sequences were confirmed.
Cell Culture and Transient Transfection Assays
293T HEK cells were maintained in DMEM media (Mediatech) with 10% newborn calf serum (NCS) and antibiotics (DMEM/NCS).
Transient transfections were performed using a standard HBS × CaCl2 protocol . 0.1–0.3 μg of Luciferase reporter plasmids and 0.1–0.3 μg Renila plasmids were combined with 2–3 μg of GATA4/GATA4ki or FOG2 expressing plasmids or 2–3 μg of a balancer plasmid. Cells from one confluent well of a 6-well plate were used; cells were incubated with the precipitate overnight and the media was replaced with a fresh aliquot of DMEM/NCS the next morning.
Luciferase Dual Reporter assay
Cells were lysed 48 hours post-transfection as recommended by the Luciferase Dual Reporter Assay protocol (Promega). After lysis the cells were centrifugated at maximal speed, the supernatant was diluted 10 times and used immediately for measuring the luciferase activity; activity of the firefly luciferase was normalised to the Renilla reporter activity. Each experiment was repeated at least three times. Each value was compared to control (reporter vectors in the presence of the balancer plasmid) in each experiment and values from three independent experiments were analyzed; the final graph was built using Microsoft Excel application (Microsoft).
Embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 2 h (hours), washed with PBS for 4 h in a cold room using several changes of PBS. Fixed embryos were soaked in 30% sucrose in PBS overnight at 4°C, positioned and frozen in the OCT (Fisher Scientific) and kept at -80°C until further use. 10 μM sections of the frozen embryos were cut on the cryostat (Leica) and lifted on the Superfrost slides pre-treated with the Vectabond (Vector). For the immunodetection of the LHX9 protein, slides were blocked/permeabilized in PBS containing 5% Carnation non-fat milk and 0.1% Triton X-100 (Fisher) for 1 h at RT. Blocked slides were reacted with the rabbit anti-LH2A/B antibody (a kind gift from Dr. Thomas Jessell) diluted 1:300 and detected with donkey anti-rabbit Alexa 555 antibodies (Molecular Probes). Mouse anti-Isl1 39.4D5b diluted 1:300 was detected by goat anti mouse Alexa 488 (Molecular Probes). Mouse anti-TNNT2 (1:500; USBiologicals) was detected with goat anti-mouse Alexa 488; rat anti-Endoglin (1:300; Pharmingen) was detected with the goat anti-rat Alexa 488 antibody; all secondary antibodies were used at a 1:500 dilution. PBS-washed slides were mounted in Vectashield media with DAPI (Vector). Pictures were acquired using a Magnafire camera (Olympus) with an Olympus fluorescent microscope as previously described .
Transient transfections were performed using an HBS × CaCl2 protocol essentially as described above with HEK293 cells cultured on 10 cm plates with 9 μg of pCS2+HA-Lhx9 combined with 9 μg pCMV5a-Isl1α_FLAG or pCMV5a-Isl1β_FLAG or pCMV5a-Cited2_FLAG or pCMV5a-Mab21l2_FLAG plasmid (negative control). Cells were harvested 48 hours after transfection as previously described . Briefly, plates were washed with PBS put on ice and cells were lysed directly with a "TNN-plus" buffer [50 M Tris HCl pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Igepal (Sigma), 5 mM EDTA and a complete protease inhibitor (Roche)]. Lysates were centrifuged and supernatants were transferred to new tubes several times to remove cell debris. IP was performed by incubating the cleared lysates with 25 μl of Anti-HA Affinity Matrix (Roche) for 2 h in a cold room followed by 4 washes with TNN-plus. 1/100 of a lysate or 1/10 of an IP were analysed by a Western blot. Proteins were detected on a Immobilon membrane (Millipore) either with a rabbit HA antibody (Santa Cruz) followed by an anti-rabbit HRP conjugate (Bio-Rad; 1:3000) or directly with an anti FlagM2 peroxidase Conjugate (Sigma; 1:3000).
The authors would like to thank Thomas Jessell for his kind gift of the LHX9 antibody and for providing the immunostaining protocol and William Pu for sharing his protocol for mouse genotyping. This work was partially supported by the HHMI Grant to Dartmouth Medical School under the Biomedical Research Program for Medical Schools (Grant # 76200-560801), an NIH Grant (HD42751) and a grant from the Department of Defense Congressionally Mandated Medical Research Program on Breast Cancer (W81XWH-06-1-0394) to SGT.
- Tevosian SG, Deconinck AE, Cantor AB, Rieff HI, Fujiwara Y, Corfas G, Orkin SH: FOG-2: A novel GATA-family cofactor related to multitype zinc-finger proteins Friend of GATA-1 and U-shaped. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96 (3): 950-955. 10.1073/pnas.96.3.950.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tevosian SG, Deconinck AE, Tanaka M, Schinke M, Litovsky SH, Izumo S, Fujiwara Y, Orkin SH: FOG-2, a cofactor for GATA transcription factors, is essential for heart morphogenesis and development of coronary vessels from epicardium. Cell. 2000, 101 (7): 729-739. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80885-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Novak K: Lost in the FOG. Nat Med. 2000, 6 (8): 864-10.1038/78615.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shalaby F, Rossant J, Yamaguchi TP, Breitman ML, Schuh AC: Failure of blood island formation and vasculogenesis in flk-1 deficient mice. Nature. 1995, 376: 62-66. 10.1038/376062a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bautch VL, Ambler CA: Assembly and patterning of vertebrate blood vessels. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2004, 14 (4): 138-43. 10.1016/j.tcm.2004.02.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cantor AB, Orkin SH: Coregulation of GATA factors by the Friend of GATA (FOG) family of multitype zinc finger proteins. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2005, 16 (1): 117-28. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2004.10.006. Epub 2004 Dec 15View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sorrentino RP, Gajewski KM, Schulz RA: GATA factors in Drosophila heart and blood cell development. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2005, 16 (1): 107-116. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2004.10.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crispino JD, Lodish MB, MacKay JP, Orkin SH: Direct association of FOG with GATA-1 is critical for erythroid differentiation and expression of multiple, but not all, GATA-1 target genes. Mol Cell. 1999, 3 (2): 219-28. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80312-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Crispino JD, Letting DL, Nakazawa M, Poncz M, Blobel GA: Control of megakaryocyte-specific gene expression by GATA-1 and FOG-1: role of Ets transcription factors. Embo J. 2002, 21 (19): 5225-34. 10.1093/emboj/cdf527.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsang AP, Visvader JE, Turner CA, Fujiwara Y, Yu C, Weiss MJ, Crossley M, Orkin SH: FOG, a multitype zinc finger protein, acts as a cofactor for transcription factor GATA-1 in erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation. Cell. 1997, 90 (1): 109-119. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80318-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fox AH, Liew C, Holmes M, Kowalski K, Mackay J, Crossley M: Transcriptional cofactors of the FOG family interact with GATA proteins by means of multiple zinc fingers. Embo J. 1999, 18 (10): 2812-2822. 10.1093/emboj/18.10.2812.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawabata H, Germain RS, Ikezoe T, Tong X, Green EM, Gombart AF, Koeffler HP: Regulation of expression of murine transferrin receptor 2. Blood. 2001, 98 (6): 1949-54. 10.1182/blood.V98.6.1949.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Svensson EC, Tufts RL, Polk CE, Leiden JM: Molecular cloning of FOG-2: a modulator of transcription factor GATA-4 in cardiomyocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96 (3): 956-961. 10.1073/pnas.96.3.956.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu JR, McKinsey TA, Xu H, Wang DZ, Richardson JA, Olson EN: FOG-2, a heart- and brain-enriched cofactor for GATA transcription factors. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19 (6): 4495-4502.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crispino JD, Lodish MB, Thurberg BL, Litovsky SH, Collins T, Molkentin JD, Orkin SH: Proper coronary vascular development and heart morphogenesis depend on interaction of GATA-4 with FOG cofactors. Genes Dev. 2001, 15 (7): 839-844. 10.1101/gad.875201.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Svensson EC, Huggins GS, Lin H, Clendenin C, Jiang F, Tufts R, Dardik FB, Leiden JM: A syndrome of tricuspid atresia in mice with a targeted mutation of the gene encoding Fog-2. Nat Genet. 2000, 25 (3): 353-356. 10.1038/77146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hong W, Nakazawa M, Chen YY, Kori R, Vakoc CR, Rakowski C, Blobel GA: FOG-1 recruits the NuRD repressor complex to mediate transcriptional repression by GATA-1. Embo J. 2005, 24 (13): 2367-78. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600703.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez P, Bonte E, Krijgsveld J, Kolodziej KE, Guyot B, Heck AJ, Vyas P, de Boer E, Grosveld F, Strouboulis J: GATA-1 forms distinct activating and repressive complexes in erythroid cells. Embo J. 2005, 24 (13): 2354-66. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600702.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deconinck AE, Mead PE, Tevosian SG, Crispino JD, Katz SG, Zon LI, Orkin SH: FOG acts as a repressor of red blood cell development in Xenopus. Development. 2000, 127 (10): 2031-2040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin AC, Roche AE, Wilk J, Svensson EC: The N termini of Friend of GATA (FOG) proteins define a novel transcriptional repression motif and a superfamily of transcriptional repressors. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (53): 55017-23. 10.1074/jbc.M411240200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Svensson EC, Huggins GS, Dardik FB, Polk CE, Leiden JM: A functionally conserved N-terminal domain of the friend of GATA-2 (FOG-2) protein represses GATA4-dependent transcription. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275 (27): 20762-9. 10.1074/jbc.M001522200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holmes M, Turner J, Fox A, Chisholm O, Crossley M, Chong B: hFOG-2, a novel zinc finger protein, binds the co-repressor mCtBP2 and modulates GATA-mediated activation. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274 (33): 23491-8. 10.1074/jbc.274.33.23491.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hobert O, Westphal H: Functions of LIM-homeobox genes. Trends Genet. 2000, 16 (2): 75-83. 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01883-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allan DW, Thor S: Together at last: bHLH and LIM-HD regulators cooperate to specify motor neurons. Neuron. 2003, 38 (5): 675-7. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00329-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liem KF, Tremml G, Jessell TM: A role for the roof plate and its resident TGFbeta-related proteins in neuronal patterning in the dorsal spinal cord. Cell. 1997, 91 (1): 127-38. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80015-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bertuzzi S, Porter FD, Pitts A, Kumar M, Agulnick A, Wassif C, Westphal H: Characterization of Lhx9, a novel LIM/homeobox gene expressed by the pioneer neurons in the mouse cerebral cortex. Mech Dev\. 1999, 81 (1-2): 193-8. 10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00233-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Retaux S, Rogard M, Bach I, Failli V, Besson MJ: Lhx9: a novel LIM-homeodomain gene expressed in the developing forebrain. J Neurosci. 1999, 19 (2): 783-93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bermingham NA, Hassan BA, Wang VY, Fernandez M, Banfi S, Bellen HJ, Fritzsch B, Zoghbi HY: Proprioceptor pathway development is dependent on Math1. Neuron. 2001, 30 (2): 411-22. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00305-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Birk OS, Casiano DE, Wassif CA, Cogliati T, Zhao L, Zhao Y, Grinberg A, Huang S, Kreidberg JA, Parker KL, Porter FD, Westphal H: The LIM homeobox gene Lhx9 is essential for mouse gonad formation. Nature. 2000, 403 (6772): 909-913. 10.1038/35002622.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Failli V, Rogard M, Mattei MG, Vernier P, Retaux S: Lhx9 and Lhx9alpha LIM-homeodomain factors: genomic structure, expression\ patterns, chromosomal localization, and phylogenetic analysis. Genomics. 2000, 64 (3): 307-17. 10.1006/geno.2000.6123.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee KJ, Mendelsohn M, Jessell TM: Neuronal patterning by BMPs: a requirement for GDF7 in the generation of a discrete class of commissural interneurons in the mouse spinal cord. Genes Dev. 1998, 12 (21): 3394-407. 10.1101/gad.12.21.3394.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bendall AJ, Rincon-Limas DE, Botas J, Abate-Shen C: Protein complex formation between Msx1 and Lhx2 homeoproteins is incompatible with DNA binding activity. Differentiation. 1998, 63 (3): 151-7. 10.1046/j.1432-0436.1998.6330151.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li DY, Sorensen LK, Brooke BS, Urness LD, Davis EC, Taylor DG, Boak BB, Wendel DP: Defective angiogenesis in mice lacking endoglin. Science. 1999, 284 (5419): 1534-7. 10.1126/science.284.5419.1534.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dettman RW, Denetclaw W, Ordahl CP, Bristow J: Common epicardial origin of coronary vascular smooth muscle, perivascular fibroblasts, and intermyocardial fibroblasts in the avian heart. Dev Biol. 1998, 193 (2): 169-181. 10.1006/dbio.1997.8801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mikawa T, Fischman DA: Retroviral analysis of cardiac morphogenesis: discontinuous formation of coronary vessels. 1992Google Scholar
- Mikawa T, Gourdie RG: Pericardial mesoderm generates a population of coronary smooth muscle cells migrating into the heart along with ingrowth of the epicardial organ. Dev Biol. 1996, 174 (2): 221-232. 10.1006/dbio.1996.0068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perez-Pomares JM, Macias D, Garcia-Garrido L, Munoz-Chapuli R: The origin of the subepicardial mesenchyme in the avian embryo: an immunohistochemical and quail-chick chimera study. Dev Biol. 1998, 200 (1): 57-68. 10.1006/dbio.1998.8949.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vrancken Peeters MP, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Mentink MM, Poelmann RE: Smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts of the coronary arteries derive from epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of the epicardium. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1999, 199 (4): 367-378. 10.1007/s004290050235.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laugwitz KL, Moretti A, Lam J, Gruber P, Chen Y, Woodard S, Lin LZ, Cai CL, Lu MM, Reth M, Platoshyn O, Yuan JX, Evans S, Chien KR: Postnatal isl1+ cardioblasts enter fully differentiated cardiomyocyte lineages. Nature. 2005, 433 (7026): 647-53. 10.1038/nature03215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Komiyama M, Ito K, Shimada Y: Origin and development of the epicardium in the mouse embryo. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1987, 176 (2): 183-189. 10.1007/BF00310051.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reese DE, Mikawa T, Bader DM: Development of the coronary vessel system. Circ Res. 2002, 91 (9): 761-8. 10.1161/01.RES.0000038961.53759.3C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Munoz-Chapuli R, Macias D, Gonzalez-Iriarte M, Carmona R, Atencia G, Perez-Pomares JM: [The epicardium and epicardial-derived cells: multiple functions in cardiac development.]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2002, 55 (10): 1070-82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Viragh S, Challice CE: The origin of the epicardium and the embryonic myocardial circulation in the mouse. Anat Rec. 1981, 201 (1): 157-168. 10.1002/ar.1092010117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirose T, Karasawa M, Sugitani Y, Fujisawa M, Akimoto K, Ohno S, Noda T: PAR3 is essential for cyst-mediated epicardial development by establishing apical cortical domains. Development\. 2006, 133 (7): 1389-98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kolterud A, Wandzioch E, Carlsson L: Lhx2 is expressed in the septum transversum mesenchyme that becomes an integral part of the liver and the formation of these cells is independent of functional Lhx2. Gene Expr Patterns. 2004, 4 (5): 521-8. 10.1016/j.modgep.2004.03.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tevosian SG, Albrecht KH, Crispino JD, Fujiwara Y, Eicher EM, Orkin SH: Gonadal differentiation, sex determination and normal Sry expression in mice require direct interaction between transcription partners GATA4 and FOG2. Development. 2002, 129 (19): 4627-4634.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ovcharenko I, Nobrega MA, Loots GG, Stubbs L: ECR Browser: a tool for visualizing and accessing data from comparisons of multiple vertebrate genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (Web Server issue): W280-6. 10.1093/nar/gkh355.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jurata LW, Pfaff SL, Gill GN: The nuclear LIM domain interactor NLI mediates homo- and heterodimerization of LIM domain transcription factors. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273 (6): 3152-7. 10.1074/jbc.273.6.3152.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thaler JP, Lee SK, Jurata LW, Gill GN, Pfaff SL: LIM factor Lhx3 contributes to the specification of motor neuron and interneuron identity through cell-type-specific protein-protein interactions. Cell. 2002, 110 (2): 237-49. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00823-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glenn DJ, Maurer RA: MRG1 binds to the LIM domain of Lhx2 and may function as a coactivator to stimulate glycoprotein hormone alpha-subunit gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274 (51): 36159-67. 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36159.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun Y, Liang X, Najafi N, Cass M, Lin L, Cai CL, Chen J, Evans SM: Islet 1 is expressed in distinct cardiovascular lineages, including pacemaker and coronary vascular cells. Dev Biol. 2007, 304 (1): 286-96. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.12.048.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murray-Zmijewski F, Lane DP, Bourdon JC: p53/p63/p73 isoforms: an orchestra of isoforms to harmonise cell differentiation and response to stress. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13 (6): 962-72. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401914.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qian F, Zhen F, Xu J, Huang M, Li W, Wen Z: Distinct functions for different scl isoforms in zebrafish primitive and definitive hematopoiesis. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5 (5): e132-10.1371/journal.pbio.0050132.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsuzuki S, Hong D, Gupta R, Matsuo K, Seto M, Enver T: Isoform-specific potentiation of stem and progenitor cell engraftment by AML1/RUNX1. PLoS Med. 2007, 4 (5): e172-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040172.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Molle B, Pere S, Failli V, Bach I, Retaux S: Lhx9 and lhx9alpha: differential biochemical properties and effects on neuronal differentiation. DNA Cell Biol. 2004, 23 (11): 761-8. 10.1089/dna.2004.23.761.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liodis P, Denaxa M, Grigoriou M, Akufo-Addo C, Yanagawa Y, Pachnis V: Lhx6 activity is required for the normal migration and specification of cortical interneuron subtypes. J Neurosci. 2007, 27 (12): 3078-89. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3055-06.2007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daubas P, Tajbakhsh S, Hadchouel J, Primig M, Buckingham M: Myf5 is a novel early axonal marker in the mouse brain and is subjected to post-transcriptional regulation in neurons. Development. 2000, 127 (2): 319-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mukhopadhyay M, Teufel A, Yamashita T, Agulnick AD, Chen L, Downs KM, Schindler A, Grinberg A, Huang SP, Dorward D, Westphal H: Functional ablation of the mouse Ldb1 gene results in severe patterning defects during gastrulation. Development. 2003, 130 (3): 495-505. 10.1242/dev.00225.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rincon-Limas DE, Lu CH, Canal I, Botas J: The level of DLDB/CHIP controls the activity of the LIM homeodomain protein apterous: evidence for a functional tetramer complex in vivo. Embo J. 2000, 19 (11): 2602-14. 10.1093/emboj/19.11.2602.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bach I: The LIM domain: regulation by association. Mech Dev. 2000, 91 (1-2): 5-17. 10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00314-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ostendorff HP, Peirano RI, Peters MA, Schluter A, Bossenz M, Scheffner M, Bach I: Ubiquitination-dependent cofactor exchange on LIM homeodomain transcription factors. Nature. 2002, 416 (6876): 99-103. 10.1038/416099a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hiratani I, Yamamoto N, Mochizuki T, Ohmori SY, Taira M: Selective degradation of excess Ldb1 by Rnf12/RLIM confers proper Ldb1 expression levels and Xlim-1/Ldb1 stoichiometry in Xenopus organizer functions. Development. 2003, 130 (17): 4161-75. 10.1242/dev.00621.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manuylov NL, Fujiwara Y, Adameyko, Poulat F, Tevosian SG: The regulation of Sox9 gene expression by the GATA4/FOG2 transcriptional complex in dominant XX sex reversal mouse models. Dev Biol. 2007Google Scholar
- Manuylov NL, Smagulova FO, Tevosian SG: Fog2 excision in mice leads to premature mammary gland involution and reduced Esr1 gene expression. Oncogene. 2007Google Scholar
- Wilkinson DG: In Situ Hybridization. 1992, New-York , IRL Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Adameyko, Mudry RE, Houston-Cummings NR, Veselov AP, Gregorio CC, Tevosian SG: Expression and regulation of mouse SERDIN1, a highly conserved cardiac-specific leucine-rich repeat protein. Dev Dyn. 2005, 233 (2): 540-552. 10.1002/dvdy.20368.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 1989, 2nd edition: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York-Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.