Skip to content


You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Developmental Biology

Open Access

Histamine metabolism influences blood vessel branching in zebrafish reg6mutants

BMC Developmental Biology20088:31

Received: 26 June 2007

Accepted: 25 March 2008

Published: 25 March 2008



Vascular branching morphogenesis is responsible for the extension of blood vessels into growing tissues, a process crucial for organogenesis. However, the genetic mechanism for vessel branching is largely unknown. Zebrafish reg6 is a temperature-sensitive mutation exhibiting defects in blood vessel branching which results in the formation of swollen vessel lumina during capillary plexus formation.


We performed a screening for chemical suppressors of reg6 and identified SKF91488, an inhibitor of histamine methyltransferase (HMT), that can rescue the reg6 vessel branching defects in a dose-dependent manner. Inhibition of HMT by SKF91488 presumably blocks histamine degradation, thus causing histamine accumulation. Consistent with this idea, we found that a high level of histamine also showed significant suppression of reg6 vessel phenotypes. Interestingly, when reg6 adults that had already developed swollen vessel lumina in regenerating fins were treated with histamine or SKF91488, either treatment significantly reduced the number of swollen vessels within 12 h, suggesting a rapid and constant influence of histamine on blood vessel branching. Furthermore, the expression of HMT was significantly elevated in reg6 regenerating fins. Conversely, lowering histamine by administering urocanic acid, a histidine decarboxylase inhibitor, enhanced the reg6 phenotypes. Finally, we identified that the transcription factor, egr-1 (early growth response factor 1), was closely associated with the reg6 phenotype and chemical treatments.


Taken together, our results suggest that blood vessel branching is influenced by histamine metabolism, possibly through regulating the expression of the egr-1 transcription factor.


Blood vessels are important for transporting oxygen and nutrients to cells for survival and proper functioning. In early embryos, the pioneer trunk vessels, the dorsal aorta and cardinal vein, develop from vascular endothelial cells derived from the lateral plate mesoderm through a process called vasculogenesis. Subsequently, blood vessels grow from existing vessels, through a process referred to as angiogenesis, into peripheral tissues and developing organs [1]. In developing embryos, increasing evidence has revealed that blood vessels also provide signals for the proper morphogenesis of developing organs [2]. In the adult form of organisms, angiogenesis and/or vasculogenesis to regrow blood vessels in wounded tissues is needed to repair damaged and replace lost tissues [3, 4]. In humans, it has been well documented that angiogenesis plays a vital role in tumor growth, and thus the potential of antiangiogenesis drugs to inhibit tumor growth has been extensively explored worldwide [5].

During angiogenesis, vascular branching is one of the key morphogenetic events, which presumably is responsible for constructing a complex vascular network which assures that blood is available to every single cell. Despite its important role in sustaining organismic development throughout life, the genetic mechanism of blood vessel branching is largely unknown partly due to the intricate interactions between molecular signals and numerous cell types that are involved in angiogenesis, e.g., multiple cellular activities, including cell proliferation, migration, extension, and possibly cell fate specification all of which require signaling through multiple growth factors such as VEGF, FGF, PDGF, and EGF. Interactions between blood vessel endothelial cells and neighboring cells and even cells in the bloodstream can also regulate angiogenesis [6]. More recently, it has been implied that immune-mediated cells and molecules can influence blood vessel growth in adults. For example, mast cells have been found to aggregate at sites of active angiogenesis under both physiological and pathological conditions [7]. Histamine has been determined to be an angiogenic factor [8, 9] and is thought to be directly involved in tumor growth based on findings of high expression levels and enzymatic activity of the key histamine synthesis enzyme, histidine decarboxylase, in numerous growing tumors, such as small-cell lung carcinoma [10, 11]. In fact, clinical trials have shown that histamine H2 receptor antagonists, such as cimetidine and ranitidine, increase the survival of gastric and colon cancer patients [12, 13]. It has also been reported that histamine regulates angiogenesis at the level of cell proliferation and cell permeability [14, 15]. Thus, histamine seems to be involved in multiple cellular and molecular interactions during angiogenesis. It is still unclear whether histamine can influence blood vessel branching during angiogenesis, and if it does, through which intracellular signaling pathway it works.

In this report, we took a chemical genetic approach to reveal the role of histamine in vascular branching using a zebrafish reg6 mutation which causes specific vascular branching defects without affecting endothelial cell proliferation [16]. We show that vessel branching defects in reg6 mutants can be rescued by a high level of histamine either directly added to the water or by inhibiting histamine degradation using a histamine methyltransferase (HMT) inhibitor. On the other hand, blocking histamine synthesis by a histidine decarboxylase inhibitor enhanced the reg6 vessel phenotypes. Finally, we show that the expression level of the egr-1 transcription factor, but not the VEGF family, is strongly correlated with the reg6 phenotypes, suggesting that histamine might modulate blood vessel branching by regulating egr-1 levels.


Specific blood vessel branching defect of the zebrafish reg6mutation

The zebrafish reg6 mutation was isolated by its defects during caudal fin regeneration [17]. It was previously shown that the reg6 mutation causes blood vessel dilation during plexus formation of vessel regeneration due to defects in blood vessel branching, not in cell proliferation [16]. Herein, we further tested whether the reg6 vessel branching phenotype might be due to or might cause the cell migration defect by measuring the distance endothelial cells were able to migrate at different stages of blood vessel regeneration. Upon amputation, blood vessels undergo wound healing to seal the ends within the first 24 h followed by sprouting to reconnect the severed vessels and resume blood circulation at the amputation site. Blood vessel endothelial cells then proliferate and begin to migrate into the regenerating tissues to form a vascular plexus [16]. We found that regenerating endothelial cells in both wild-type and reg6 fish are able to migrate more than 0.35 mm within 2 days post amputation (dpa) (Figure 1A, B, I) when the swollen vessel lumen phenotype has just begun to develop (Figure 1B, yellow arrows), suggesting that vessel dilation is not due to a cell migration defect. When the same fish were measured again at 3 dpa, we found that endothelial cells in reg6 fish had migrated more than 0.8 mm, which was similar to that in wild-type fish (Figure 1I) despite significantly swollen vessels having developed (Figure 1D, F, yellow arrows). Thus, the formation of swollen vessel lumina in reg6 fish does not seem to cause cell migration defects, at least up to 3 dpa. Cross-sections of reg6 regenerating fins revealed enlarged lumina in most of the regenerating vessels (Figure 1H, arrows).
Figure 1

Normal migration of regenerating endothelial cells in zebrafish reg6 mutants. (A, B) Combined bright field and green fluorescent images of wild-type TG(fli1:EGFP)y1 (A) and reg6;TG(fli1:EGFP)y1 (B) regenerating fins at 2 days post amputation (dpa) showing the distance (designated by white double arrows) that the blood vessel endothelial cells (ECs) have migrated. Yellow arrows, dilated vessels of reg6 mutants. (C-F) In 3-dpa regenerates, wild-type fish have formed normal capillary plexuses (C, yellow arrows in E)., but reg6 fish (D, bright field; F, green fluorescent) have developed numerous swollen vessels (yellow arrows in D and F) resulting in blood cell accumulation (red spots in D). (G, H) Cross-sections of 3-dpa regenerates showing normal regenerating vessels in wild-type (G) and dilated vessels in reg6 fish (H, yellow arrows). Red arrows, amputation plane. Scale bars, 300 μm. (I) Quantitative data of the migration distance of regenerating ECs in wild-type (black bars) and reg6 fish (white bars) at 2 and 3 dpa.

To understand the cellular defects in angiogenic endothelial cells of reg6 mutants, we examined the cell integrity by whole-mount and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We first noted that the permeability of reg6 endothelial cells seemed defective as leaked blood cells were often observed in reg6 regenerating fins (Figure 2B, G). In addition, while endothelial cells stretch thin and form tight junctions and intact enclosed blood vessels of different sizes in wild-type regenerating fins (Figure. 2C, E and Additional file 1), reg6 endothelial cells did not appear as stretched-out as those in the wild-type and seldom formed obvious tight junction (Figure 2D, F and Additional file 2). Taken together, our current and previous [16] results suggest that reg6 function is specifically required for cell elongation and the formation of tight junctions between endothelial cells that are essential for blood vessel branching morphogenesis.
Figure 2

Cellular defects of reg6 endothelial cells. (A, B) Overlaid images of bright field and green fluorescent protein (GFP) of wild-type (A) and reg6 (B) 3-dpa regenerating fins showing the leakage of blood cells in reg6 fish (arrows). Transmission electron microscopic images of wild-type fish (C, low magnification; E, high magnification) showing that the blood vessel is enclosed by several endothelial cells which form nice, intact tight junctions (arrow in E). Additional images can be found in Additional file 1. In contrast, the blood vessels in reg6 fish (D) were usually leaking as evidenced by the lack of coverage by endothelial cells (arrow) and the presence of blood cells outside blood vessels (as an endothelial cell is sandwiched by two blood cells in G and arrows in Additional file 2). In addition, reg6 endothelial cells appeared less stretched-out (D), and tight junction were rarely formed among them (F). Scale bars, 2 μm for C, D, F, and G; 10 nm for E. white asterisks, blood cell; black asterisks, endothelial cell.

Isolation of a chemical suppressor of the reg6mutation

A similar swollen-vessel phenotype was also observed in developing caudal veins of reg6 mutants during embryogenesis (Figure 3; [16]). In wild-type embryos, the posterior cardinal vein branches to form a transient capillary plexus beginning at around 30 h post fertilization (hpf) (Figure 3A, C; [18]), which is typically located ventral to the dorsal aorta in the tail and is comprised of 2 or 3 parallel yet interconnected vessels (Figure 3E, F). In reg6 mutants, however, the caudal vein forms fewer branches and develops a large swollen vascular lumen (Figure 3B, D, G, H). The reg6 mutation is temperature sensitive causing up to 70% penetrance of its embryonic phenotypes at 33°C (Figure 4E) and 0%~5% at 20°C (not shown). The temperature sensitivity of its regenerating vessel phenotype is described below (see also [16]). Taking advantage of the incomplete penetrance of the reg6 embryonic phenotype, we initiated a screening to search for chemical suppressors and enhancers of reg6 mutation. We tested a small collection of known compounds using reg6-homozygous embryos (see "Methods"). Of the 560 tested chemicals, one showed significant suppression of reg6 phenotypes in developing caudal veins at a concentration of 10 μM (Figure 4C, D). This chemical, 4-(N, N-dimethylamino) butylisothiourea dihydrochloride (SKF91488), is an inhibitor of HMT, the major enzyme responsible for histamine degradation [19]. To test the specificity of SKF91488 on reg6 vessel phenotypes and its cytotoxicity to developing embryos, we treated reg6 and wild-type embryos with different concentrations of the compound. The results showed that suppression was dose-dependent, and the penetrance of the reg6 embryonic phenotype could be reduced to 20% by 50 μM SKF91488 (Figure 4E). The HMT inhibitor caused no morphological defects or vessel over-branching in wild-type embryos at as high as 100 μM (data not shown).
Figure 3

Embryonic phenotype of the reg6 mutation. (A, C) In a 36-hpf (hours post fertilization) wild-type embryo (A, bright field; C, green fluorescent), the developing caudal veins form vascular plexuses (yellow arrow in C). (B, D) In contrast, endothelial cells of reg6 embryos (B, bright field; D, green fluorescent) develop fewer vessel branches and form swollen lumina (yellow arrows). Lateral view; anterior, left; dorsal, top. Scale bar, 100 μm for A-D. (E-H) Cross-sections of the tail regions showing multiple lumina of the capillary plexus of a wild-type caudal vein (E, yellow arrows in F) but a single enlarged lumen in reg6 (G, yellow arrow in H). N, notochord; white arrows, dorsal aorta; yellow arrows, caudal vein; red arrow, accumulated blood cells.

Figure 4

Suppression of the reg6 embryonic phenotype by SKF91488 and histamine. (A, bright field; B, GFP) Untreated reg6 embryos developed dilated caudal veins at 33°C (yellow arrows). (C, bright field; D, GFP) reg6 embryos treated with 10 μM HMT inhibitor SKF91488 developed normal caudal veins. Anterior, left; dorsal, top. (E) Typically, almost 70% of reg6 embryos formed dilated caudal veins at 33°C (blue bar). The penetrance was reduced by SKF91488 (red bars, n = 50) and histamine (green bars, n = 50).

Suppression of the reg6embryonic phenotype by a high level of histamine

As HMT is responsible for methylating histamine thus precipitating its degradation, the above results led us to hypothesize that SKF91488 might cause accumulation of histamine, which in turn would rescue reg6 phenotypes. We tested this hypothesis by treating reg6 embryos with histamine. The results showed that a high level of histamine indeed was able to rescue the embryonic phenotypes of reg6 mutants, although the concentration of histamine needed to produce significant suppression was 1000 μM (Figure 4E, green bars). Like the HMT inhibitor, a high level of histamine caused no discernible developmental defects in wild-type zebrafish embryos (data not shown).

Suppression of the reg6regenerating vessel phenotype by SKF91488 and histamine

As shown before, the blood vessel phenotype in regenerating reg6 fins develops swollen vessel lumina at a high temperature (33°C). To further confirm the effect of histamine on reg6 vessel branching defects, we treated regenerating vessels of reg6 and wild-type adult fish with histamine and SKF91488. Consistent with the results obtained from embryos, the regenerated swollen vessel lumen phenotype in reg6 fish was both quantitatively and qualitatively suppressed by 10 μM SKF91488, as treated ones formed fewer and smaller blood blisters than their untreated siblings (Figure 5A–C). We then tested whether histamine can also rescue the reg6 phenotype in regenerating vessels. In fact, 1 mM histamine did suppress the reg6 regenerating vessel phenotype (data not shown). We noted that while most stocks of reg6 formed swollen lumina in 15 vessels/fish on average at 33°C (Figure 5E, H2O group), some stocks possibly formed 7 swollen vessels/fish (Figure 5C, H2O group). But within the same inbred family, the penetrance was less variable (CC Huang, unpublished observations). Therefore, we were careful to use fish of the same stock for making comparisons. These results suggested that increasing the histamine level can rescue the blood vessel branching defect of zebrafish reg6 mutants.
Figure 5

Suppression of the reg6 regenerating vessel phenotype by SKF91488 and histamine. (A) reg6 regenerating vessels formed swollen lumina 3 days post amputation (dpa) at 33°C (yellow arrows). (B) In the presence of 10 μM SKF91488, reg6 mutants developed significantly smaller and fewer swollen vessels (yellow arrows). Red arrows, amputation plane. (C) Quantitative data of the suppression of reg6 regenerating vessels by SKF91488 (n = 5 for each group). This experiment was repeated at least 3 times, and consistent results were observed. (D) Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) analyses showed elevated levels of histamine methyltransferase (HMT) RNA in both reg6 2 and 3-dpa regenerates compared with the wild-type. (E) Both SKF91488 and histamine could reverse the reg6 vessel phenotypes. The number of swollen vessels in reg6 mutants was counted at 3 dpa at 33°C (blue bars; B, before treatment) before they were transferred to either fresh water (H2O), 10 μM SKF91488, or 1 mM histamine. The number of swollen vessels was counted again 12 h later (red bars; P, post-treatment). Shown is a representative set of data with 10 fish. Similar results were obtained from 2 independent experiments with different stocks of reg6 fish.

The above results led us to hypothesize that the expression of HMT might increase in reg6 mutants, which is responsible for the histamine deficit. To test this, we analyzed the amount of HMT RNA in wild-type and reg6 regenerates by quantitative PCR (QPCR). We found that the amounts of HMT RNA were nearly 5- and 3-fold higher in reg6 2 and 3-dpa regenerates, respectively, than in wild-type ones (Figure 5D).

Reversion of reg6dilated vessels by histamine and SKF91488

We wondered whether histamine and SKF91488 are able to reduce the severity of the vessel phenotype in reg6 mutants even after significant swollen vessels had formed. To test this, we first allowed reg6 mutants to regenerate at 33°C for 3 days to develop swollen lumina, and then shifted them to either 10 μM SKF91488, 1 mM histamine, or H2O. We then compared the number of swollen vessels before and then 12 h after the shift. In the H2O group, the number of swollen vessels in reg6 fish was about the same within the 12-h period: near 20 swollen vessels/fish (Figure 5E). With SKF91488 treatment, however, the number of swollen vessels was significantly reduced to an average of 10 swollen vessels/fish (Figure 5E, P < 0.01, n = 10). Histamine also reduced the number from 20 to fewer than 15 (P = 0.03, n = 10). In the distal portions of regenerating fins of reg6 adults, the vessel defects usually caused necrosis and degeneration, which were thus greatly reduced by histamine and SKF91488 (data not shown). We concluded that a high level of histamine can reverse the swollen vessel phenotype of the reg6 mutation.

Enhancement of the reg6regenerating vessel phenotype by a histamine synthesis blocker

To further verify the role of histamine in promoting blood vessel branching, we next tested whether blocking histamine synthesis could enhance reg6 vessel branching defects. As stated before, the reg6 mutation is temperature sensitive. At a low temperature (20°C), the number of swollen vessels in reg6 regenerates was nearly zero (Figure 6). We treated reg6 regenerating vessels at this temperature with urocanic acid, one of the inhibitors of histidine decarboxylase which is the key enzyme for histamine synthesis. The results showed that the number of swollen vessels in 3-dpa reg6 regenerating fins at 20°C was about 1.9 ± 1.5/fin (n = 10), and this increased to 6.9 ± 2.9/fin (n = 9) with 300 μM urocanic acid (Figure 6A and 6B for morphological comparisons and C for quantitative data). A similar effect was also observed at 6 dpa during plexus formation of regeneration at 20°C (Figure 6C). Note that fin regeneration was much slower at 20°C than at 33°C, and regeneration at 3 and 6 dpa at 20°C corresponded to the vessel anastomosis and plexus formation stages of vessel regeneration, respectively, both of which are affected by the reg6 mutation [16]. Urocanic acid at 300 μM caused no reg6-like phenotype or toxicity in wild-type adult fish (data not shown).
Figure 6

Chemical enhancer of reg6 mutation. (A) reg6 is a temperature-sensitive mutation and regenerates almost normally at 20°C. Shown is the regenerating vessels 6 days post amputation at 20°C. Note that they regenerated much more slowly at the low temperature. (B) When treated with 300 μM of the histidine decarboxylase inhibitor, urocanic acid, reg6 siblings developed a significant number of swollen vessels (yellow arrows). Red arrows, amputation plane. (C) The enhancement by urocanic acid of reg6 vessel defects was evaluated at two regenerative stages, during anastomosis (3 dpa at 20°C, n = 10) and plexus formation (6 dpa at 20°C, n = 10) that are both affected by the reg6 mutation [16]. U300, 300 μM of urocanic acid.

Histamine synthesis blocker causes blood vessel branching defect in wild-type zebrafish embryos

To address whether histamine also influences blood vessel branching in wild-type fish, we treated the wild-type TG(fli1:EGFP)y1 developing embryos with urocanic acid. In these experiments, we focused on the effect of urocanic acid on the caudal veins which normally form highly branched vascular plexuses during 30–48 hpf of the development (Figure 7A). Among the several doses and treating conditions that we tried, we found that 300 μM of urocanic acid, treated from 6–32 hpf, had no effect on the caudal vein development or the survival rate whereas 900 μM of urocanic acid could cause slightly increase of less branched caudal veins and more than 50% of lethality (data not shown). However, shorter treatment from 26–32 hpf with 900 μM urocanic acid caused lower lethality rate but significantly increase of poorly branched caudal veins (Figure 7B, C). These results demonstrate that blocking histamine synthesis indeed hampers blood vessel branching in wild-type zebrafish embryos.
Figure 7

Blocking of histamine synthesis causes blood vessel branching defects in wild-type zebrafish embryos. (A) In a 32 hpf wild-type embryo, the developing caudal vein formed a transient vascular plexus. (B) When treated with 900 μM of the histamine synthesis blocker, urocanic acid, the caudal vein of a wild-type sibling formed much fewer vascular branches and even developed a reg6-like swollen lumen. Red arrows, caudal veins. (C) Quantitative results of the suppression of urocanic acid on blood vessel branching in wild-type zebrafish embryos. Two clutches of wild-type embryos (blue and red bars) were treated with the vehicle (0.0015 hydrochloric acid), or 300 or 900 μM of urocanic acid in egg water, from 26–36 hpf at 28.5°C. The percentage of embryos with less branched caudal vein was scored at the end of treatment (Y-axis, n = 40 unless otherwise specified).

Association between egr-1 expression and the reg6vascular phenotype

To test whether VEGF is involved in the mechanism for suppressing reg6 blood vessel branching defects by histamine, we performed QPCRs to examine the expression levels of known VEGFs and their receptors and some known angiogenic factors in wild-type and reg6 regenerating fins. We found no correlation between VEGF signaling and the reg6 phenotype, as the expression levels of zebrafish VEGF-A, C, and D, and VEGFR1, 2, and 3 were approximately the same in both wild-type and reg6 fish (Figure 8A and Additional file 3). Interestingly, we found that the level of egr-1, which is known to be involved in angiogenesis [20] was downregulated in reg6 fish (Figure 8A). Whole-mount in situ hybridization also showed a significant decrease in egr-1 expression in reg6 3-dpa regenerating fins (Figure 8C). More importantly, the expression of egr-1 in reg6 mutants was found to be elevated by approximately 2.5-fold after treatment with 1 mM histamine or 10 μM SKF91488 and downregulated by urocanic acid, compared with water-treated siblings (Figure 8D). In contrast, expression levels of VEGFs and their receptors did not change or changed by less than 2-fold after treatment with histamine, SKF91488, or urocanic acid (Additional file 4). These results suggest that histamine might promote blood vessel branching by regulating egr-1 expression directly or indirectly. Note that this correlation was only found in adult fish, not in embryos (data not shown), suggesting that histamine might influence regenerative and embryonic angiogenesis through different mechanisms.
Figure 8

Association of egr-1 expression and the reg6 vessel branching defect. (A) Expression levels of the egr-1 gene in wild-type (wt; black bars) and reg6 (white bars) 3-dpa regenerates. (B, C) Whole-mount in situ hybridization for egr-1 on wild-type (B) and reg6 (C) 3-dpa regenerates showed decreased expression of egr-1 in reg6 fish. Arrows, egr-1 RNA signal. (D) The egr-1 expression in reg6 mutants was upregulated more than 2.5-fold by 1 mM histamine and 10 μM SKF91488 but was downregulated by 300 μM urocanic acid. The expression level was determined by QPCR and normalized by the expression level of the β-actin gene.


Zebrafish angiogenesis mutation for drug discovery and chemical genetics

We utilized a zebrafish mutation to demonstrate the power of zebrafish for drug discovery and examining chemical genetics. In particular, when using the embryonic phenotype for initial screening, which only required 0.5 μg of the test compound (with a MW of 250), the adult phenotypes, if they existed, allowed us to verify the drug effect with only 5 μg of drug for each test (see also "Methods"). In conjunction with TG(fli1:EGFP)y1 transgenic fish, the screening could be specifically targeted for angiogenesis-related drugs (see also [21]). In addition, with zebrafish, we were able to perform toxicity tests at the same time at the whole organism level. All these factors make zebrafish a great tool for drug testing and discovery. The reg6 mutation is unique in that it is homozygously viable and displays similar blood vessel branching defects during embryogenesis and fin regeneration. More importantly, the reg6 mutation has the advantage of temperature sensitivity which allowed us to screen for suppressors and enhancers. Since reg6 mutants display specific defects in blood vessel branching, it has become a good tool for studying the genetic and pharmacological mechanisms of vessel branching which are largely unknown.

The role of histamine in blood vessel branching in reg6and wild-type zebrafish

Our results reveal a role of histamine in promoting vessel branching during angiogenesis using zebrafish reg6 mutants. The reg6 mutants were found to have specific defects in blood vessel branching during plexus formation [16]. When reg6 mutants were treated with the HMT inhibitor, SKF91488, which presumably causes accumulation of histamine, or with a high level of histamine, the blood vessel branching defect of reg6 was significantly rescued. In contrast, blocking histamine synthesis enhanced the reg6 phenotype. These results were further supported by the finding that HMT expression is elevated in reg6 mutants. All these suggest a simple model for the reg6 blood vessel branching defect which results from a high level of HMT and concomitant histamine deficit.

The role of histamine in regulating blood vessel branching is also observed in wild-type zebrafish. In Figure 7, we showed that blocking histamine synthesis with urocanic acid causes blood vessel branching defect and/or a reg6-like phenotype in the caudal veins of wild-type zebrafish embryos. In this experiment, however, we learned that it really required high concentration and careful selection of time window of urocanic acid treatment in order to see its effect on blood vessel branching. Treatment of high concentration of urocanic acid for long period of time, e.g. from 6–32 hpf caused high lethality rate in developing embryos suggesting that histamine is important for other developmental processes. Furthermore, we noted that urocanic acid did not seem to suppress the branching of intersegmental vessels, suggesting that the influence of histamine on vascular branching morphogenesis is selective or more sensitive for the plexus-forming blood vessels.

Possible mechanisms of regulating blood vessel branching by histamine

As vascular branching involves complex intracellular and extracellular changes, including breakdown of the extracellular matrix and intercellular junctions, reorganization of the cytoskeleton, and induction of cell proliferation, it is difficult to predict the mechanism through which histamine rescues vessel branching defects in reg6 fish. Even though our phenotypic characterizations provide clues to the specific endothelial cellular defects underlying reg6 vascular defects, including defects in cell extension, cell junction formation, and likely permeability as well, it is still not possible at this moment to define a cellular mechanism for the rescue effect of histamine in reg6 fish due to the fact that the genetic identity of reg6 has yet to be resolved. We have mapped reg6 to the telomere region of LG 25 (CC Huang, unpublished results) where sequence information is largely lacking, and thus, it is difficult to obtain an accurate physical map. We are currently verifying a physical map of that region assembled by the Zebrafish Genome Sequencing Project at the Sanger Center with our reg6 mapping panels. We will need to build a more-accurate physical map of this region for future mapping and cloning of the reg6 gene.

Nevertheless, we have obtained more clues to reg6's function from previous and the present studies. Our previous study showed that the reg6 mutation does not cause over-proliferation of regenerating endothelial cells and that reg6 function is specifically required during plexus formation when blood vessel endothelial cells are actively branching [16]. In this study, we further showed that the reg6 mutation does not affect the migration of regenerating endothelial cells. Instead, endothelial cells of reg6 mutants seem to be defective in extending cell processes and forming cell junctions among themselves. Our results also suggest that reg6's function might be involved in regulating histamine metabolism and egr-1 expression. Consistent with previous results, we observed no effect of histamine on endothelial cell proliferation or migration in wild-type fish, even though it has been shown that histamine is able to cause endothelial cell proliferation in vitro [11, 14]. Our studies using the zebrafish reg6 mutation provide evidence that histamine likely modulates blood vessel branching at a yet unidentified cellular level other than cell proliferation or migration.

Correlation of egr-1 and the vessel branching defects of reg6

It is very intriguing that we found a close relationship between the egr-1 transcription factor and reg6 phenotypes. The level of egr-1 was low in reg6 mutant fish during regenerative angiogenesis, was elevated by histamine and an HMT inhibitor, and was further reduced upon treatment with a histamine synthesis blocker (Figure 8D). Although the role of egr-1 and its relationship with histamine in vascular branching awaits further studies, we found an interesting feature of egr-1 in our studies that seem to echo previous finding. Fahmy et al [20] has shown that egr-1 is required for angiogenesis and tumor growth through an FGF but not a VEGF signaling pathway. Our QPCR analyses showed that the transcription levels of VEGFs and VEGFRs remained the same in wild-type and reg6 fish with or without histamine manipulations suggesting that the mechanism(s) of blood vessel branching mediated by histamine that involves egr-1 is independent of the VEGF signaling. It would be exciting to know whether histamine modulates blood vessel branching directly through egr-1 and/or a FGF pathway.

Direct and indirect actions of histamine on blood vessel endothelial cells

Histamine has been shown to increase vessel permeability by regulating the expression of cell adhesion molecules such as VCAM [15] and the composition of the extracellular matrix [22]. Presumably, these actions together can promote vessel branching. Our result that histamine can prevent the formation of swollen vessel lumina suggests its influence on actively branching vascular cells. We also showed that histamine can reverse the swelling of vessels and return them to normal, suggesting a role of histamine during vascular plexus remodeling. One possible explanation for these results is that histamine affects a cellular mechanism that is common to both vascular activities, for example cell adhesion or extracellular matrix remodeling. In fact, the histamine receptor inhibitor, cimitidine, has been shown to downregulate the endothelial expression of E-selectin adhesion molecules and prevent tumor metastasis [23], which raises the possibility that histamine might directly modulate vessel branching on endothelial cells by regulating E-selectin expression. However, the fact that histamine does not change endothelial cell proliferation or cause over-branching or any other morphological changes in wild-type fish suggests that endothelial cells are not the direct target of histamine. Thus, it is possible that histamine might both directly and indirectly influence vascular branching.


We demonstrate the power of using a zebrafish mutation in pharmacogenetic studies. Our studies using the zebrafish reg6 mutation revealed the role of histamine in regulating blood vessel branching and the potential linkage of angiogenic factor egr-1 to this process.


Fish husbandry

Fish maintenance and breeding were performed according to standard procedures [24].

Chemical screening with reg6embryos

reg6 homozygous embryos were obtained by in vitro fertilization for chemical screening of clones due to the concerns that reg6 embryos from different clutches might show variable degrees of phenotypic penetrance. Embryos from different pairs of parents were kept separate, and 20 embryos from each individual clutch were set aside to monitor the phenotypic penetrance. The protocol for chemical treatment of zebrafish embryos was adapted from Peterson et al. [25] with minor modifications. These embryos were allowed to develop at 28.5°C until 6 h post-fertilization (hpf) and then were arrayed into 96-well plates, at 5 embryos/well with 200 μl of egg water (distilled water containing 60 μg/ml sea salt) without antibiotics. The LOPAC chemical library (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was prepared at 2 mM in DMSO, and 1 μl of each was added to each well to make 10 μM for our initial screening. These plates were kept in a 33°C incubator and examined at around 32 hpf with a fluorescent stereomicroscope. Chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma unless otherwise signified.

Chemical treatment of adult fish

Adult fish were briefly anesthetized with 0.01% tricaine, and the caudal fins were amputated vertically at 50% of the proximal-distal axis. Five amputated fish were put into a 250-ml beaker containing 100 ml of aquatic water with or without chemicals. These fish were then kept in a 33°C incubator for 3 days without feeding. With this protocol, the wild-type fish could regenerate normally, while reg6 fish developed swollen vessel lumina. To quantify the reg6 phenotype, the number of vessels that developed obviously swollen lumina was determined. Since each fin ray except for the two lateral fin rays contains three vessels [16], 48 vessels of the 16 fin rays were examined and scored for a typical caudal fin with 18 fin rays.

Transmission electron microscopy

Embryos were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde, 2% paraformaldehyde, and 0.1 M sodium phosphate (pH 7.4) overnight at 4°C. Fixed embryos were washed with 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer 3 times for 5 min each, and post-fixed with 1% OsO4 for 1 h at room temperature. The fixed embryos were dehydrated by the following ethanol series: 30% for 10 min, 50% for 10 min, 70% for 20 min, 80% for 20 min, 90% for 20 min, 95% for 20 min, and 100% for 60 min, and then twice in acetone for 30 min each. Infiltration was carried out first with 1:1 resin: acetone for 1 h, 2:1 resin: acetone for 1 h, pure resin for 1 h, and finally pure resin overnight. Embryos were placed in a 70°C oven overnight for embedding. The plastic blocks were then trimmed and sectioned to obtain 1 μm or ultrathin section of 70~90 nm which were collected on 200-mesh copper grids and stained with uranyl acetate for 50 min and lead citrate for 10 min. Sections were analyzed under a Hitachi H-7000 transmission electron microscope equipped with AMT XR40 CCD camera (Advanced Microscopy Techniques, Danvers, MA USA).

Whole mount in situhybridization

Regenerative fins were harvested and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C. The whole-mount in situ hybridization was done with the InsituPro VS robot by Intavis Bioanalytical Instruments AG (Koln, Germany) following standard procedures of the manufacturer.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR)

Wild-type or reg6 homozygous embryos were treated with chemicals for 26 h (from 6 to 32 hpf) or 8 h (from 24 to 32 hpf) at 33°C and then manually dechorionated at the end of treatment. Fifty embryos from each treatment were subjected to RNA extraction with Trizol following instructions of the manufacturer. Around 5 μg of total RNA was then used to generate cDNAs with Superscript II (Invitrogen). Quantitative PCR was performed with a Power Cybergreen (ABI) labeling kit in an ABI7000 thermocycler. The data were analyzed with the software provided by ABI. When using adult fish, five 3-dpa regenerative fins from treated or untreated wild-type or reg6 fish were collected.




We thank Dr. Jeff Lee at National Taiwan University for providing the VEGFC primers for the QPCR and the Core facility of the Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology at Academia Sinica for their assistance with in vitro hybridization, QPCR, and TEM. C.C.H. was a distinguished postdoctoral fellow, Academia Sinica. This work was supported by grant 94M011-1 from the Genomic Research Center of Academia Sinica to J.Y.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica
Genome Research Center, Academia Sinica


  1. Risau W: Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Nature. 1997, 386 (6626): 671-674. 10.1038/386671a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cleaver O, Melton DA: Endothelial signaling during development. Nat Med. 2003, 9 (6): 661-668. 10.1038/nm0603-661.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayliss PE, Bellavance KL, Whitehead GG, Abrams JM, Aegerter S, Robbins HS, Cowan DB, Keating MT, O'Reilly T, Wood JM, Roberts TM, Chan J: Chemical modulation of receptor signaling inhibits regenerative angiogenesis in adult zebrafish. Nat Chem Biol. 2006, 2 (5): 265-273. 10.1038/nchembio778.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rafii S, Lyden D: Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ vascularization and regeneration. Nat Med. 2003, 9 (6): 702-712. 10.1038/nm0603-702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrara N, Kerbel RS: Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target. Nature. 2005, 438 (7070): 967-974. 10.1038/nature04483.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Red-Horse K, Crawford Y, Shojaei F, Ferrara N: Endothelium-microenvironment interactions in the developing embryo and in the adult. Dev Cell. 2007, 12 (2): 181-194. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ribatti D, Vacca A, Nico B, Crivellato E, Roncali L, Dammacco F: The role of mast cells in tumour angiogenesis. Br J Haematol. 2001, 115 (3): 514-521. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.03202.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghosh AK, Hirasawa N, Ohuchi K: Enhancement by histamine of vascular endothelial growth factor production in granulation tissue via H(2) receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2001, 134 (7): 1419-1428. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704372.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Norrby K: Evidence of a dual role of endogenous histamine in angiogenesis. Int J Exp Pathol. 1995, 76 (2): 87-92.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Graff L, Frungieri M, Zanner R, Pohlinger A, Prinz C, Gratzl M: Expression of histidine decarboxylase and synthesis of histamine by human small cell lung carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2002, 160 (5): 1561-1565.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cianchi F, Cortesini C, Schiavone N, Perna F, Magnelli L, Fanti E, Bani D, Messerini L, Fabbroni V, Perigli G, Capaccioli S, Masini E: The role of cyclooxygenase-2 in mediating the effects of histamine on cell proliferation and vascular endothelial growth factor production in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (19 Pt 1): 6807-6815. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0675.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tønnesen H, Knigge U, Bülow S, Damm P, Fischerman K, Hesselfeldt P, Hjortrup A, Pedersen IK, Pedersen VM, Siemssen OJ: Effect of cimetidine on survival after gastric cancer. Lancet. 1988, 2 (8618): 990-992. 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90743-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Matsumoto S, Imaeda Y, Umemoto S, Kobayashi K, Suzuki H, Okamoto T: Cimetidine increases survival of colorectal cancer patients with high levels of sialyl Lewis-X and sialyl Lewis-A epitope expression on tumour cells. Br J Cancer. 2002, 86 (2): 161-167. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600048.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Thompson WD, Brown FI: Quantitation of histamine-induced angiogenesis in the chick chorioallantoic membrane: mode of action of histamine is indirect. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp. 1987, 6 (4): 343-357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Saito H, Shimizu H, Mita H, Maeda Y, Akiyama K: Histamine augments VCAM-1 expression on IL-4- and TNF-alpha-stimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1996, 111 (2): 126-132.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang CC, Lawson ND, Weinstein BM, Johnson SL: reg6 is required for branching morphogenesis during blood vessel regeneration in zebrafish caudal fins. Dev Biol. 2003, 264 (1): 263-274. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.08.016.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson SL, Weston JA: Temperature-sensitive mutations that cause stage-specific defects in Zebrafish fin regeneration. Genetics. 1995, 141 (4): 1583-1595.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Isogai S, Horiguchi M, Weinstein BM: The vascular anatomy of the developing zebrafish: an atlas of embryonic and early larval development. Dev Biol. 2001, 230 (2): 278-301. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9995.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Medina MA, Correa-Fiz F, Rodríguez-Caso C, Sánchez-Jiménez F: A comprehensive view of polyamine and histamine metabolism to the light of new technologies. J Cell Mol Med. 2005, 9 (4): 854-864. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00384.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fahmy RG, Dass CR, Sun LQ, Chesterman CN, Khachigian LM: Transcription factor Egr-1 supports FGF-dependent angiogenesis during neovascularization and tumor growth. Nat Med. 2003, 9 (8): 1026-1032. 10.1038/nm905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cross LM, Cook MA, Lin S, Chen JN, Rubinstein AL: Rapid analysis of angiogenesis drugs in a live fluorescent zebrafish assay. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003, 23 (5): 911-912. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000068685.72914.7E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Alexander JS, Elrod JW: Extracellular matrix, junctional integrity and matrix metalloproteinase interactions in endothelial permeability regulation. J Anat. 2002, 200 (6): 561-574. 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00057.x.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kobayashi K, Matsumoto S, Morishima T, Kawabe T, Okamoto T: Cimetidine inhibits cancer cell adhesion to endothelial cells and prevents metastasis by blocking E-selectin expression. Cancer Res. 2000, 60 (14): 3978-3984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Westerfield M: The zebrafish Book. A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio). 2000, Eugene , University of Oregon PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson RT, Link BA, Dowling JE, Schreiber SL: Small molecule developmental screens reveal the logic and timing of vertebrate development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97 (24): 12965-12969. 10.1073/pnas.97.24.12965.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar


© Huang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.