Open Access

Targets downstream of Cdk8 in Dictyostelium development

  • David M Greene1,
  • Gareth Bloomfield2, 3,
  • Jason Skelton3,
  • Alasdair Ivens3, 4 and
  • Catherine J Pears1Email author
BMC Developmental Biology201111:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-11-2

Received: 24 June 2010

Accepted: 21 January 2011

Published: 21 January 2011

Abstract

Background

Cdk8 is a component of the mediator complex which facilitates transcription by RNA polymerase II and has been shown to play an important role in development of Dictyostelium discoideum. This eukaryote feeds as single cells but starvation triggers the formation of a multicellular organism in response to extracellular pulses of cAMP and the eventual generation of spores. Strains in which the gene encoding Cdk8 have been disrupted fail to form multicellular aggregates unless supplied with exogenous pulses of cAMP and later in development, cdk8- cells show a defect in spore production.

Results

Microarray analysis revealed that the cdk8- strain previously described (cdk8-HL) contained genome duplications. Regeneration of the strain in a background lacking detectable gene duplication generated strains (cdk8-2) with identical defects in growth and early development, but a milder defect in spore generation, suggesting that the severity of this defect depends on the genetic background. The failure of cdk8- cells to aggregate unless rescued by exogenous pulses of cAMP is consistent with a failure to express the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A. However, overexpression of the gene encoding this protein was not sufficient to rescue the defect, suggesting that this is not the only important target for Cdk8 at this stage of development. Proteomic analysis revealed two potential targets for Cdk8 regulation, one regulated post-transcriptionally (4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPD)) and one transcriptionally (short chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR1)).

Conclusions

This analysis has confirmed the importance of Cdk8 at multiple stages of Dictyostelium development, although the severity of the defect in spore production depends on the genetic background. Potential targets of Cdk8-mediated gene regulation have been identified in Dictyostelium which will allow the mechanism of Cdk8 action and its role in development to be determined.

Background

The serine/threonine kinase Cdk8 is a regulator of transcription through its association with the mediator complex [1]. This complex was originally identified as an activity that was required to allow RNA polymerase II to perform regulated transcription in vitro. Purification has revealed it be a large multi-protein complex with varying composition. The presence of a submodule containing Cdk8 and its protein partner cyclin C has been proposed to be a mechanism to regulate mediator activity, responsible for both activation and inhibition of transcription through phosphorylation of either the C terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (CTD) or of gene-specific transcription factors. The yeast orthologues of Cdk8 (Srb10) and cyclin C (Srb11) were identified genetically as suppressors of defects caused by truncation of the CTD, consistent with a role in regulation of transcription. Microarray analysis suggests that yeast lacking Srb10 show altered expression of around 3% of genes [2]. Orthologues of Cdk8 are apparent in all eukaryotes, but the mechanisms of regulation are not well defined. In S. cerevisiae, proteolysis of the cyclin C orthologue has been proposed in response to stresses such as oxidative stress [3], but this has not been reported in other systems.

In mammalian cells Cdk8 activity has been implicated in regulation of growth through its overexpression in tumour cells [4], as well as in development. Cdk8 plays an important role in the Notch signalling pathway as recruitment of Cdk8 to the promoter of a developmentally regulated gene (HES1) causes hyperphosphorylation of the intracellular domain of the Notch transcription factor, promoting its degradation and leading to subsequent down regulation of transcription of HES1 [5]. Cdk8-dependent regulation of transcription factor stability has also been reported in S. cerevisiae where phosphorylation of Ste12 and GCN4 by Srb10 promotes their degradation [6, 7]. Consistent with a role in development, Cdk8 shows tissue specific expression during zebra fish development and disruption of genes encoding components of the mediator sub-complex containing Cdk8 cause developmental defects in C. elegans, Drosophila and Arabidopsis [810].

Previous reports have implicated Cdk8 activity in development of Dictyostelium amoebae [11, 12] which feed and proliferate as single cells but, upon starvation, undergo a developmental life cycle [13]. Starving cells start to secrete pulses of cAMP that acts as a chemoattractant for the surrounding cells which aggregate to form a multicellular organism. This aggregate undergoes a series of morphogenetic changes leading to the generation of a fruiting body in which around 80% of the cell differentiate into spore cells while the remaining cells differentiate into stalk cells to support the spore head above the substratum. Dictyostelium strains in which the gene encoding Cdk8 have been disrupted grow poorly in shaking suspension and fail to aggregate unless supplied with exogenous pulses of cAMP [11, 12]. The cells also fail to express a number of genes associated with early development, including the gene encoding the adenylyl cyclase (aca) responsible for cAMP generation during aggregation, which could explain the failure to aggregate. We further reported that for the cdk8-null strain generated in our lab (henceforth called cdk8-HL) pulsing with exogenous cAMP could rescue the early aggregation defect. If these cells were then plated on a surface, they went on to form aberrant structures with a defect in the ability to generate mature spore cells. This defect could be rescued by expression of Cdk8 but not by a kinase-dead version, implicating the kinase activity in this failure of development [11]. However, although early aggregation defects were identical, cdk8- cells generated in a different genetic background did give rise to viable spores [12].

Here we report that microarray analysis revealed genome duplications in the cdk8-HL cells, which may explain the phenotypic differences in different genetic backgrounds. Subsequent regeneration of the strain in a parent lacking detectable genomic duplications confirms the defects in aggregation and an important role for Cdk8 in spore cell differentiation, although milder than initially reported. Comparison of the protein expression profile of parental and the new strain of cdk8- (cdk8-2) cells revealed potential targets for direct regulation by Cdk8 which will facilitate analysis of the targets of Cdk8 in Dictyostelium which lead to defects in growth and development.

Results

Microarray analysis of cdk8-HLcells

In order to investigate differences in the reported phenotypes of strains containing disruption of the cdk8 gene in Dictyostelium and in light of the recent realisation that many laboratory strains of Dictyostelium contain genomic duplications [14], we investigated whether the cdk8- cells previously isolated in our laboratory, cdk8-HL, and their parent, Ax2P, contained genomic duplications. This analysis was carried out by microarray to compare the relative copy number of genes in genomic DNA isolated from these strains and from the strain Ax2K which is free of detectable duplications [14]. Comparison of both cdk8-HL and its parental Ax2 line (Ax2P) with Ax2K [14] revealed a large duplication on chromosome 2 in both cdk8-HL and Ax2P (Figure 1 and data not shown). This analysis also revealed a further duplication on chromosome 5 within cdk8-HL cells, which was not present in the parent Ax2P. A duplication on chromosome 2 in the region duplicated in Ax2P and its derivative, has previously been reported for another strain of Dictyostelium, Ax4 [15]. Comparison of the parental Ax2P gDNA with gDNA extracted from strain Ax4 showed that the novel chromosome 2 feature in the former strain spans the previously described 750 kb duplication in Ax4, and extends approximately a further 400 kb on one side of it. In view of the chromosomal duplications identified in the original cdk8-HL strain, independent null strains were generated in an Ax2 background, using the Ax2K cells with no detectable duplications [14]. Three independent strains were identified in which the cdk8 gene had been disrupted and all showed identical phenotypes to each other. In order to determine whether the phenotypes described for the original cdk8-HL strain were dependent on the genome duplications we carried out a phenotypic analysis of the newly derived cdk8-2 cells. They showed identical defects in growth in shaking suspension to the original strain (data not shown). They also failed to form aggregates on starvation, but this defect could be rescued by exogenous pulses of cAMP, as reported for the original strain, and showed similar defects in transcription of early developmental genes such as a failure to switch off expression of cprD and a failure to induce expression of early developmental genes such as pkaC, aca and carA on starvation (data not shown) [11, 12]. These results suggested that the early developmental phenotype was not influenced by the genome alterations in the original cdk8-HL strain.
Figure 1

Microarray comparisons of genomic DNA from Ax2, Ax4 and cdk8 - HL strains. The log(2)ratio of abundance of each gene in each comparison is plotted against the position of that gene on the chromosome. Ax2P is the parental strain used to generate cdk8-HL and Ax2K is the Ax2 strain with minimal genomic duplications [14]. Shown are comparison of genes on Chromosome 2 between Ax2K and cdk8-HL, and between Ax2P (the parent of cdk8-HL) and Ax4, and a comparison of genes on chromosome 5 for Ax2K and cdk8-HL. The approximate position of the putative cdk8-HL duplications relative to Ax2K are marked with grey horizontals bars. Logratios of approximately 1 or -1 indicate 2-fold changes in copy number (duplications); logratios around zero indicate equal copy number. The known Ax4 duplication is marked with a red horizontal bar; logratios in this region average approximately zero in this comparison show that both strains have the same copy number here. Ax2P has a longer duplication than that apparent in Ax4, though in the same region, as represented by the grey bar in the middle panel. The cdk8 gene is found on chromosome 1 and so its loss is not apparent on the comparisons shown here.

Late developmental phenotype of the cdk8-2strain

In order to examine the newly generated cdk8-2 strain for the presence or absence of the late developmental phenotype, cells were suspended in KK2 buffer and pulsed with 50 nM cAMP every 5mins for 6hrs, before being harvested, washed and plated on KK2 agar. Unlike the cdk8-HL strain, the cdk8- 2 cells formed phenotypically normal fruiting bodies, although culmination occurred 3-4hrs later than in the Ax2bsR control strain (Figure 2A). Ax2bsR was created by random insertion of the vector designed for disruption of the cdk8 gene into the genome of Ax2K. Upon culmination, the spiA gene (a gene induced late in spore differentiation and found to be expressed at reduced levels in the original cdk8-HL cells) was expressed at similar levels in both the cdk8-2 and Ax2bsR strains (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

Late developmental phenotype of cdk8 - 2 cells. (A) Cells were developed in KK2 buffer at 1 x 107cells/ml with or without cAMP pulsing (50 nm cAMP added to the suspension every 5 minutes). Each strain was shaken for 6hrs at 150 rpm at 22°C before being spread onto filters at a density of 3 x 106 cell/cm2. Photographs were taken after 28hrs. The scale bar in the right hand panel represents 200 μm. (B) Expression of SpiA in cdk8-2 cells. Fruiting bodies formed after cAMP pulsing were harvested after 24hrs or 28 hrs. RNA was extracted from these samples and resolved on a 1% formaldehyde gel, transferred to a nylon membrane and probed with a 32P labelled fragment of the spiA gene. The blot was reprobed with a 32P labelled fragment of the IG7 gene so as to control for loading. (C) Viability of cdk8-2 spores. Fruiting bodies were formed by developing cells in shaken suspension with cAMP pulsing prior to plating. Equal numbers of spores from each strain were treated with heat and detergent and spread onto a bacterial lawn. Colonies resulting from hatching of viable spores were counted after 4-5 days. Each bar represents the mean (±standard deviation) of three independent experiments. Results showing statistically significant difference from Ax2bsR are marked with a * (p < 0.05 by student t-test).

Viability of cdk8-2spores

In order to investigate whether the spores generated by the cdk8-2 strain were viable, their ability to germinate after heat and detergent treatment was tested. Fruiting bodies formed by the mutant and control strains were harvested and disaggregated. An equal number of spores from each strain were exposed to detergent and heat treatment in order to destroy any non-viable spores and undifferentiated amoebae. The number of surviving spores from each strain that were capable of germination was determined by spreading dilutions onto bacterial lawns and counting the resultant colonies.

This analysis revealed that cdk8-2 spores were less viable than those of the Ax2bsR strain. Whilst 98% of spores from the control strain were able to germinate after heat and detergent treatment, this was true for only 40% of cdk8-2 spores (Figure 2C). This defect in spore formation phenotype is much milder than that of the previous cdk8-HL strain in which virtually no resistant spore cells were formed [11]. This data suggests that, although the phenotype was exaggerated in the duplication-containing background, there is a consistent defect in spore cell formation in the absence of cdk8.

Requirement for kinase activity of Cdk8

The cdk8-2 strain was transformed with an extrachromosomal vector to drive expression of an epitope tagged version of Cdk8 (myc-Cdk8) from a semi-constitutive actin15 promoter (pDXA[act15::myc-cdk8) and a version containing a point mutation (pDXA[act15::myc-cdk8 kd ]) to create a kinase deficient form of the same protein (myc-Cdk8kd) [11]. The expression of each Cdk8 protein was confirmed by western blot (Figure 3A). Expression of the myc-Cdk8 protein in cdk8-2 cells resulted in rescue of all the observed growth and developmental phenotypes. In contrast, the cdk8-2[myc-cdk8 kd ] strain grew at a rate comparable to the cdk8-2 strain and did not form aggregates upon starvation (Figures 3B and 3C). The cdk8-2 [myc-cdk8] spores exhibited a similar viability (89%) to those of the Ax2bsR strain (104%) implying that expression of the myc-Cdk8 protein complemented the late developmental phenotype (Figure 3D). In contrast, the cdk8-2[myc-cdk8 kd ] spores exhibited a similar viability (43%) to those of the cdk8-2 strain (39%). These observations implied that the phenotypes observed in the cdk8-2 strain were directly attributable to a loss of Cdk8 kinase activity.
Figure 3

Complementation of cdk8- 2 growth and aggregation defects. (A) Expression of the myc-Cdk8 and myc-Cdk8kd proteins was confirmed by western blotting. Samples were collected from vegetatively growing cells of each strain and resolved on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and probed with the antibodies indicated. The blot was reprobed with an α-actin antibody to control for loading. (B) Complementation of slow-growth phenotype. Growth in HL-5 medium was assessed by counting cell number. The cdk8-2 and cdk8-2[myc-cdk8kd] strain eventually grew to a density of 2 x 107 cells/ml after 7-8days (data not shown). (C) Complementation of aggregation phenotype. Cells were developed on filters at 3 x 106 cells/ml at 22°C. Photographs were taken after 4 days. The scale bar in the bottom right hand panel represents 200 μm. (D) Complementation of spore viability defect. Fruiting bodies formed after developing with cAMP pulsing were harvested and spores assessed for viability as in Figure 2. Results showing statistically significant difference from Ax2bsR are marked with a * (p < 0.05 by student t-test).

Overexpression of pkaC in cdk8-2cells

The early developmental phenotype of the cdk8-2 cells suggested a potential gene target for regulation by Cdk8 activity. The cAMP dependent protein kinase (PKA) enzyme is vital for both aggregation and formation of spore cells (reviewed in [16]). Many aggregation-deficient strains which can be rescued by exogenous pulses of cAMP can also be rescued by restoring expression of the catalytic subunit of PKA, pkaC. As no expression of pkaC could be detected in cdk8- cells ([11] and data not shown), it was hypothesised that this may be responsible for the defect in aggregation. In order to address this question, the pDXA[act15::FLAG-pkaC] plasmid which expresses the PKA-C protein with an N-terminal FLAG-tag was transformed into the cdk8-2 and Ax2bsR to create the cdk8-2[FLAG-pkaC] and Ax2bsR[FLAG-pkaC] strains. Cell extracts from these strains were analysed by western blot to confirm expression of the 75kDa FLAG-PKA-C protein in both strains (Figure 4A).
Figure 4

Expression of constitutively active PKA in cdk8 - 2 cells. (A) Western analysis was used to confirm expression of the FLAG-PKAC protein in the Ax2bsR[FLAG-pkaC] and cdk8-2[FLAG-pkaC] cell lines. Samples were collected from vegetatively growing cells of each strain and resolved on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and probed with the α-FLAG antibody. The blot was reprobed with an α-actin antibody to control for loading. (B) Developmental phenotype of the Ax2bsR[FLAG-pkaC] and cdk8-2[FLAG-pkaC] strain. Cells were spotted onto a lawn of K. aerogenes and incubated at 22°C. Photographs were taken after 5 days. Each colony is approximately 1 cm in diameter.

Both strains were developed alongside the parental Ax2bsR and cdk8-2 strains. It has previously been shown that over expression of PKA-C results in more rapid completion of the developmental cycle [17]. As the Ax2bsR[FLAG-pkaC] strain was observed to achieve culmination more rapidly than the parental Ax2bsR strain (data not shown) it was concluded that a functional PKA-C protein was being expressed. However, expression of this protein in the cdk8-2[FLAG-pkaC] strain did not result in a rescue of the cdk8-2 aggregation defect (Figure 4B) suggesting that low levels of pkaC expression were not solely responsible for this phenotype.

Identification of proteins with altered expression levels in cdk8-cells

In order to identify targets regulated by the Cdk8 protein, whole-cell extracts from vegetatively growing cdk8-2 and Ax2bsR strains were analysed by two dimensional gel electrophoresis and gels were stained with colloidal blue. Subsequent analysis of the protein spots found that the vast majority of protein features showed equal staining intensities in both strains (Figure 5A). This characteristic was used to normalise the staining intensity of each gel against a standard. More detailed analysis found that two protein features were reproducibly altered in the cdk8-2 strain in comparison with the Ax2bsR strain (Figure 5B and 3C). A protein approximately 42kDa (p42) in size was present at higher levels in the cdk8-2 strain, whilst a smaller protein of 32kDa (p32) was consistently expressed at lower levels in the mutant strain (Figure 5C).
Figure 5

Proteomic Comparison of Ax2 bsR and cdk8 - 2 cells. (A) Aliquots containing 100 μg of soluble protein from whole-cell extracts of growing cells were acetone precipitated and resuspended in 125 μl of sample buffer. The samples were loaded onto nonlinear immobilized pH gradient strips (pH range, 3 to 11; Amersham) before isoelectric focusing on MULTIPHOR II apparatus (Amersham). After equilibration of the strip in equilibration buffer the second dimension was performed by standard gel electrophoresis using a Bis-Tris 8-12% gel. The gels were subsequently stained using colloidal blue (Invitrogen). The squares mark the approximate areas enlarged in B. (B) Enlargement of regions of the Ax2bsR and cdk8- 2 gels showing levels of the p42 and p32 proteins. The three paired biological repeats used in later analysis are shown. (C) The Imagemaster 2-DGE Platinum software (Amersham) was used to quantify the intensity of the p42 and p32 protein features as a 3-dimensional graphic. The height of each peak is representative of the intensity of each protein feature. The three biological replicates of each strain are shown.

These proteins were both possible targets of Cdk8-dependent regulation so were each excised from the gel and sequenced by mass spectrometry. This approach identified p42 as 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPD, dictybaseID number: DDB_G0277511). This metabolic enzyme is involved in catalyzing the conversion of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate to homogentisate in the tyrosine catabolic pathway [1820]. The p32 protein was identified as the protein product of gene DDB_G0290659. BLAST searches against the NCBI database revealed that this protein shares a large amount of similarity with short-chain dehydrogenase/reductases from a number of different species. It was thus named SDR1 (short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 1), while the gene encoding it was named sdrA.

Expression of the hpd and sdrAgenes

As Cdk8 is a known transcriptional regulator, it was investigated whether the altered abundance of the HPD and SDR1 proteins were mirrored by alterations in the expression of the hpd and sdrA genes. RNA was extracted from Ax2bsR and cdk8-2 cells that were growing vegetatively or had been developed on KK2 agar for 3hrs. Northern blot analysis of these samples indicated that hpd mRNA was present at equal levels in vegetatively growing cdk8-2 and Ax2bsR strains and could not be detected in either strain after three hours of development (Figure 6). Examination of sdrA mRNA levels revealed that this transcript was present at higher levels in the Ax2bsR cells than in cdk8-2 cells during vegetative growth (Figure 6). As with hpd mRNA no transcript could be detected after 3hrs of development in either strain. These observations implied that the reduced abundance of the SDR1 protein in the cdk8-2 strain may be the result of reduced expression or stability of the sdrA transcript, while the altered level of HPD was not due to a direct effect on mRNA levels.
Figure 6

Expression of hpd and sdrA in cdk8 - 2 cells. Cells were harvested after vegetative growth (0hrs) or development on KK2 agar for 3hrs at 3 x 106 cells/cm2. RNA was extracted from these samples and resolved on a 1% formaldehyde gel, transferred to a nylon membrane and probed with 32P labelled fragments of the hpd and sdrA genes. The blot was reprobed with a 32P labelled fragment of the IG7 gene to control for loading.

Discussion

The original cdk8-HL strain exhibited a complex phenotype which included defects in growth and aggregation. When developed under permissive conditions, the block upon aggregation was relieved but the resultant fruiting bodies were highly defective with no mature spores [11]. All of these defects could be complemented by expressing wild type Cdk8, but not a kinase dead version, from its endogenous promoter, so were dependent on Cdk8 activity. As a consequence of these observations, it was proposed that Cdk8 may function as a regulator of cell differentiation. A potential role for Cdk8 later in development was also suggested by a reduction in the proportion of Cdk8 associated with a high molecular weight complex late in development in response to an increase in extracellular cAMP [21].

Microarray analysis of genomic DNA revealed duplications in the genome of the cdk8-HL strain. The analysis strongly suggests that the cdk8-HL strain contains a large duplication of approximately 1.2 Mb on chromosome 2 and another smaller duplication of approximately 300 kb on chromosome 5. Chromosome 2 is the largest of the Dictyostelium chromosomes and a number of previous reports have suggested that it may be intrinsically unstable: In the NC4 strain originally isolated by John Bonner and maintained in vegetative growth for many decades, the chromosome is maintained as two smaller fragments [22]. Similarly the Ax4, but not the Ax2 strain, possesses a perfect inverted repeat of 1.5 Mb on chromosome 2 that has been proposed to be the result of a 'breakage-fusion-bridge' cycle [23]. The putative chromosome 2 duplication detected in the cdk8-HL strain is a similar size and occurs in a similar region of the chromosome as the Ax4 duplication. A number of other reports of chromosomal abberations in this region of the genome imply that it may be a hotspot for rearrangements [14]. The frequent occurrence of duplications in many strain backgrounds suggests that the segmental duplication on chromosome 5 in the cdk8-HL strain was not caused by genome instability resulting from loss of Cdk8 function.

Due to the cdk8-HL chromosomal abnormalities it was decided to create a new cdk8 disruptant. Characterisation of the newly generated mutant strain indicated that it had similar growth and aggregation defects as had previously been observed in the cdk8-HL strain [11, 12]. Expression of myc-Cdk8 but not myc-Cdk8kd rescued the growth and early development defects of the cdk8-2 strain indicating that these phenotypes were a direct consequence of an absence of Cdk8 kinase activity. PKA is a central regulator of Dictyostelium development and its activity has been found to be essential to the expression of a number of pre-aggregative genes including aca and carA [24]. As expression of pkaC, aca and carA could not be detected in cdk8- cells [11] it was suggested that Cdk8 may exert its function upstream of PKA, so a FLAG-tagged PKA-C protein was over-expressed in both the cdk8- 2 and Ax2bsR strain. This approach results in constitutively active PKA and has been used to rescue aggregation defects in a number of strains including those deficient in ACA, Erk2 and AmiB [2527]. FLAG-PKA-C protein expression in the Ax2bsR strain resulted in rapid development; a phenotype reported to be a consequence of high PKA activity [17], consistent with the production of active protein. However, although expressing similar levels of FLAG-PKA-C as detected by western blot, the cdk8-2[act15/FLAG-pkaC] strain exhibited similar defects as the cdk8-2 strain implying that defects in aggregation were not merely a consequence of defects in PKA regulated gene expression. It is possible that the levels of PKA-C expression were not high enough to rescue the defect, despite its expression from a multicopy extrachromosomal vector using a strong promoter.

The cdk8-2 aggregation deficiency is comparable to that observed in a strain deficient in AmiB [27]. These phenotypic similarities might be expected as AmiB has been identified as a Dictyostelium homologue of Med13, a component of the same Mediator module as Cdk8 [8]. However, the observation that constitutive PKA activity rescues the amiB- [27] but not the cdk8-2 aggregation defect is interesting as it implies that AmiB and Cdk8 operate in different signalling pathways. Such an observation would not be unprecedented as the Med13 and Cdk8 proteins have been shown to play subtly different roles during Drosophila development [8]. However, we cannot rule out that the precise level of overexpression of PKA-C is important in rescuing the phenotype.

Although the phenotypes of the cdk8-2 and cdk8-HL cells appeared identical with regard to growth and early development, this was not the case during later development. It was previously observed that the cdk8-HL strain formed aberrant fruiting bodies which contained virtually no viable spores. This late developmental defect was accompanied by a decrease in expression levels of the spore-specific transcript spiA [11]. In contrast, the newly generated cdk8-2 strain produced phenotypically normal fruiting bodies in which the spiA transcript was expressed at normal levels. Microscopic examination of disaggregated cdk8- fruiting bodies revealed that the strain was capable of producing morphologically normal spores (data not shown). However, these spores exhibited only 40% viability when compared to those formed by the Ax2bsR control strain. Endogenous expression of a myc-Cdk8 protein rescued this defect in spore viability indicating that it was a consequence of loss of Cdk8 function. These data suggested that Cdk8 is involved in Dictyostelium spore cell differentiation in cells that are presumed to lack the genomic duplications present in the cdk8-HL strain. However, the role is more subtle than when these duplications, and perhaps other unknown smaller-scale mutations, were present.

A 2D-PAGE comparison of the cdk8-2 and Ax2bsR strains was unable to detect any differences in the abundance of the vast majority of proteins. This is consistent with microarray analysis in which it was observed that Srb10 was involved in the regulation of only 3% of S. cerevisiae genes [2]. Despite the similarities between the cdk8-2 and Ax2bsR proteomes, two proteins were consistently observed to be present at different levels in the cdk8- 2 strain. One of these proteins was abnormally abundant in cdk8- 2 cells and was identified as the Dictyostelium homologue of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPD). The other protein, named SDR1 exhibited homology to the short chain reductase proteins and was found to be present at unusually low levels in the cdk8-2 strain.

Short chain dehydrogenases are a large family of NAD or NADP-dependent oxidoreductases working on a variety of substrates with short carbon chains. For example alcohol dehydrogenases break down alcohols which could be toxic and are also involved in generating aldehydes and ketones during various biosynthetic processes. In bacteria and yeast this enzyme can be used to synthesize alcohol in anaerobic conditions. It is not possible to predict the substrate of the Dictyostelium SDR1 from sequence homology. The SDR1 protein has been found to become associated with phagosomes during maturation [28] and expression of the sdrA gene was also found to be upregulated as part of the Dictyostelium response to Legionalla infection [29]. HPD is a metabolic enzyme involved in catalyzing the conversion of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate to 2,5 dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (homogentisate or melanic acid) as part of the pathway to degrade tyrosine and phenylalanine [1820]. In Dictyostelium, the HPD protein has been found to associate with the centrosome [30] and has been implicated in phagosomal maturation [28]. Microarray analysis revealed that the hpd gene is upregulated in the environmentally resistant aspidocyte cell type that is formed by Dictyostelium in response to stress [31]. Both of these proteins are catabolic enzymes found associated with phagosomes and are implicated in stress responses. This would fit for a general role for Cdk8 in regulating stress responses, consistent with data from S. cerevisiae showing regulation of cyclin C in response to environmental stresses [3]. Microarray analysis of S. cerevisiae deficient in srb10 (the cdk8 orthologue) showed altered expression of around 3% of yeast genes and half of these are genes derepressed during nutrient starvation [2], again consistent with a general role for Cdk8 in mediating metabolic responses.

Despite the difference in protein levels, the hpd mRNA was present at similar levels in the two strains. However the sdrA transcript was found to be significantly less abundant in cdk8-2 cells than in the Ax2bsR strain. This suggested that the lower levels of the SDR1 protein in the mutant cell line may be due to defects at the transcriptional level whereas the effect on HPD levels is post-transcriptional. The established role for Cdk8 in transcriptional regulation via the mediator complex would suggest that the sdrA gene is a candidate for direct transcriptional regulation by Cdk8 in Dictyostelium.

Conclusions

This analysis has confirmed the importance of Cdk8 at multiple stages of Dictyostelium development, although the severity of the defect in spore production depends on the genetic background. Potential targets of Cdk8-mediated gene regulation have been identified in Dictyostelium which will allow the mechanism of Cdk8 action and its role in development to be determined.

Methods

Growth, development and strain generation of Dictyostelium

Dictyostelium cells were grown axenically in HL5 medium at 22°C in shaking suspension. For development in shaking suspension, exponentially growing cells were resuspended in KK2 (16.5 mM KH2PO4, 3.8 mM K2HPO4) at 2 x 107 cells/ml and shaken at 120 rpm and 22°C for 5 hours, pulsed with 50 nm cAMP every 5 minutes. For filter development exponential axenically growing cells were washed in KK2 and re-suspended in LPS (40 mM KH2PO4, 20 mM KCl, 680 μM dihydrostreptomcin sulphate [pH7.2]), pulsed as above and plated at 3.5 x 106/cm2 on Millipore filters on an LPS soaked pad. The filters were incubated at 22°C in the dark.

The entire pkaC coding sequence was amplified by PCR using primers to introduce a FLAG tag sequence at its 5' terminus. This fragment was inserted into the BamH1 and Xho1 sites of pDXA-3C vector [32] to generate pDXA[act15/FLAG-pkaC] plasmid. The cdk8KO-pLPBLP vector was constructed to allow disruption of the cdk8 locus in Ax2K by the insertion of a blasticidin resistance (bsR) cassette. This vector contained the same regions of cdk8 homology as the pCDK8-KOI vector that had been used to create the original cdk8- strain [11] but used the pLPBLP vector [33] as its backbone. Constructs were introduced into Dictyostelium Ax2 cells by electroporation and transformants selected by growth in the presence of G418 (10 μg/ml) or Blasticidin (5 μg/ml) as appropriate. All strains were generated with the approval of the Biochemistry Department Genetic Modification Safety Committee, University of Oxford. The strain used for the phenotypic analysis in this manuscript will be lodged as a communal resource in the Dictyostelium Stock Center (dictybase.org).

Northern analysis

Total RNA was extracted from approximately 1 x 107 cells using TRIZOL RNA extraction kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Samples (10 μg) of total RNA were separated on a 1% formaldehyde-containing gel, blotted and probed by standard methods.

Analysis of genomic DNA by microarray

A protocol similar to that used to analyse RNA was used to compare genomic DNA (gDNA) by microarray. 5 μg of genomic DNA in T0.1E buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 8) was sonicated. 20 μl of 2.5X random primer mix (Bioprime kit, Invitrogen) was added and the mixture heated for 5mins at 95°C before being placed on ice. 5 μl of 10x dNTP mix (1.2 mM dATP, dTTP, dGTP and 0.6 mM dCTP in T0.1E), 3 μl of Cy5-dCTP or Cy3-dCTP (final concentration 60 μM) and 1 μl of Klenow fragment (40U/μl, Invitrogen) was then added and the reaction mixture incubated, away from light at 37°C. After 2hrs the reaction was stopped by the addition of 5 μl of 0.5 M EDTA (pH 8). The labelled gDNA was separated from other reaction components by passing the reaction mixture through a G-50 column. This gDNA was then precipitated, hybridised to the microarray slide overnight at 42°C [34]. Arrays were scanned using an Axon Instruments GenePix 4000B scanner and fluorescence quantified using the GenePix 3.0 software. Subsequent data processing steps were carried out using the limma package, part of the Bioconductor project, using the R statistical environment [3537]. Background fluorescence was subtracted using the method of Kooperberg et al [38] and data were then normalised using the print-tip loess algorithm. Single hybridisations were sufficient to identify large segmental duplications. The array data has been deposited in ArrayExpress under the accession E-TABM-1013. The array design, also available from ArrayExpress, has the accession A-SGRP-3.

Two dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis

Aliquots of whole cell extracts containing 100 μg of soluble protein were acetone precipitated and the pellets resuspended in 125 μl of sample buffer (5 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl0-dimethylamminio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), 4% dimethylbenzylammonium propane sulfonate (NSDB-256), 1% tributylphosphine (TBP), 1% dithiothreitol, 10 mM benzamidine, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM sodium fluoride and trace amounts of bromophenol blue). The samples were absorbed into a nonlinear immobilized pH gradient strip (pH 3-11, Amersham) and isoelectric focusing performed using MULTIPHOR II apparatus (Amersham) according to the manufacturer's guidelines [39]. Each strip was then immersed in equilibration buffer (4 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2% DTT, 2% SDS, 0.05 M Tris [pH 6.8], 30% glycerol, and trace levels of bromophenol blue). Proteins absorbed into the strip were then resolved according to size using standard electrophoresis on NuPage bis-Tris 4-12% ZOOM gels (Invitrogen). Gels were subsequently stained with colloidal blue (Invitrogen) and features analyzed using ImageMaster 2-DGE Platinum software (Amersham).

Protein identification

Protein spots were cut from the gel, digested with Trypsin and peptide masses were identified by Tandem Mass Spectroscopy (MS-MS) [39]. Peptide masses were compared to protein databases (DictyBase, NCBI, SwissProt) using BLAST for protein identification.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Rob Kay for his invaluable input into the array, Gregory Warnes for the software package used for heatmap analysis. We are indebted to our colleagues at Dictybase and the proteomics facility in Dundee for mass spectrometry. This work was supported by The Wellcome Trust (Grant no 063612 and 081548/Z/06/Z). We would like to acknowledge all members of the Pears and Lakin labs for helpful discussion.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biochemistry Department, Oxford University
(2)
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
(3)
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus
(4)
Fios Genomics Ltd, ETTC, King's Buildings

References

  1. Conaway RC, Sato S, Tomomori-Sato C, Yao T, Conaway JW: The mammalian Mediator complex and its role in transcriptional regulation. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2005, 30: 250-255. 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.03.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Holstege FC, Jennings EG, Wyrick JJ, Lee TI, Hengartner CJ, Green MR, Golub TR, Lander ES, Young RA: Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell. 1998, 95: 717-728. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81641-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooper KF, Mallory MJ, Strich R: Oxidative stress-induced destruction of the yeast C-type cyclin Ume3p requires phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C and the 26S proteasome. Molecular and cellular biology. 1999, 19: 3338-3348.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Firestein R, Bass AJ, Kim SY, Dunn IF, Silver SJ, Guney I, Freed E, Ligon AH, Vena N, Ogino S, et al: CDK8 is a colorectal cancer oncogene that regulates beta-catenin activity. Nature. 2008, 455: 547-551. 10.1038/nature07179.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fryer CJ, White JB, Jones KA: Mastermind recruits CycC:CDK8 to phosphorylate the Notch ICD and coordinate activation with turnover. Molecular cell. 2004, 16: 509-520. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.10.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nelson C, Goto S, Lund K, Hung W, Sadowski I: Srb10/Cdk8 regulates yeast filamentous growth by phosphorylating the transcription factor Ste12. Nature. 2003, 421: 187-190. 10.1038/nature01243.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chi Y, Huddleston MJ, Zhang X, Young RA, Annan RS, Carr SA, Deshaies RJ: Negative regulation of Gcn4 and Msn2 transcription factors by Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase. Genes & development. 2001, 15: 1078-1092.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Loncle N, Boube M, Joulia L, Boschiero C, Werner M, Cribbs DL, Bourbon HM: Distinct roles for Mediator Cdk8 module subunits in Drosophila development. The EMBO journal. 2007, 26: 1045-1054. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601566.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang W, Chen X: HUA ENHANCER3 reveals a role for a cyclin-dependent protein kinase in the specification of floral organ identity in Arabidopsis. Development (Cambridge, England). 2004, 131: 3147-3156.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Yoda A, Kouike H, Okano H, Sawa H: Components of the transcriptional Mediator complex are required for asymmetric cell division in C. elegans. Development (Cambridge, England). 2005, 132: 1885-1893.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin HH, Khosla M, Huang HJ, Hsu DW, Michaelis C, Weeks G, Pears C: A homologue of Cdk8 is required for spore cell differentiation in Dictyostelium. Developmental biology. 2004, 271: 49-58. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.03.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Takeda K, Saito T, Ochiai H: A novel Dictyostelium Cdk8 is required for aggregation, but is dispensable for growth. Development, growth & differentiation. 2002, 44: 213-223.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Strmecki L, Greene DM, Pears CJ: Developmental decisions in Dictyostelium discoideum. Developmental biology. 2005, 284: 25-36. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.05.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bloomfield G, Tanaka Y, Skelton J, Ivens A, Kay RR: Widespread duplications in the genomes of laboratory stocks of Dictyostelium discoideum. Genome Biol. 2008, 9: R75-10.1186/gb-2008-9-4-r75.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Glockner G, Eichinger L, Szafranski K, Pachebat JA, Bankier AT, Dear PH, Lehmann R, Baumgart C, Parra G, Abril JF, et al: Sequence and analysis of chromosome 2 of Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature. 2002, 418: 79-85. 10.1038/nature00847.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Loomis WF: Role of PKA in the timing of developmental events in Dictyostelium cells. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998, 62: 684-694.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Anjard C, Pinaud S, Kay RR, Reymond CD: Overexpression of Dd PK2 protein kinase causes rapid development and affects the intracellular cAMP pathway of Dictyostelium discoideum. Development (Cambridge, England). 1992, 115: 785-790.Google Scholar
  18. Taniguchi K, Armstrong MD: The Enzymatic Formation of Omicron-Hydroxyphenylacetic Acid. J Biol Chem. 1963, 238: 4091-4097.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fellman JH, Fujita TS, Roth ES: Assay, properties and tissue distribution of p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate hydroxylase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972, 284: 90-100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fellman JH, Fujita TS, Roth ES: Substrate specificity of p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate hydroxylase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972, 268: 601-604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Greene DM, Hsu DW, Pears CJ: Control of cyclin C levels during development of dictyostelium. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e10543-10.1371/journal.pone.0010543.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cox EC, Vocke CD, Walter S, Gregg KY, Bain ES: Electrophoretic karyotype for Dictyostelium discoideum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 8247-8251. 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8247.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Eichinger L, Pachebat JA, Glockner G, Rajandream MA, Sucgang R, Berriman M, Song J, Olsen R, Szafranski K, Xu Q, et al: The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature. 2005, 435: 43-57. 10.1038/nature03481.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schulkes C, Schaap P: cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity is essential for preaggregative gene expression in Dictyostelium. FEBS Lett. 1995, 368: 381-384. 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00676-Z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Aubry L, Maeda M, Insall R, Devreotes PN, Firtel RA: The Dictyostelium mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK2 is regulated by Ras and cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) and mediates PKA function. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 3883-3886. 10.1074/jbc.272.7.3883.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang B, Kuspa A: Dictyostelium development in the absence of cAMP. Science. 1997, 277: 251-254. 10.1126/science.277.5323.251.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kon T, Adachi H, Sutoh K: amiB, a novel gene required for the growth/differentiation transition in Dictyostelium. Genes Cells. 2000, 5: 43-55. 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2000.00305.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gotthardt D, Blancheteau V, Bosserhoff A, Ruppert T, Delorenzi M, Soldati T: Proteomics fingerprinting of phagosome maturation and evidence for the role of a Galpha during uptake. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006, 5: 2228-2243. 10.1074/mcp.M600113-MCP200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Farbrother P, Wagner C, Na J, Tunggal B, Morio T, Urushihara H, Tanaka Y, Schleicher M, Steinert M, Eichinger L: Dictyostelium transcriptional host cell response upon infection with Legionella. Cell Microbiol. 2006, 8: 438-456. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00633.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Reinders Y, Schulz I, Graf R, Sickmann A: Identification of novel centrosomal proteins in Dictyostelium discoideum by comparative proteomic approaches. J Proteome Res. 2006, 5: 589-598. 10.1021/pr050350q.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Serafimidis I, Bloomfield G, Skelton J, Ivens A, Kay RR: A new environmentally resistant cell type from Dictyostelium. Microbiology. 2007, 153: 619-630. 10.1099/mic.0.2006/000562-0.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Manstein DJ, Schuster HP, Morandini P, Hunt DM: Cloning vectors for the production of proteins in Dictyostelium discoideum. Gene. 1995, 162: 129-134. 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00351-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Faix J, Kreppel L, Shaulsky G, Schleicher M, Kimmel AR: A rapid and efficient method to generate multiple gene disruptions in Dictyostelium discoideum using a single selectable marker and the Cre-loxP system. Nucleic acids research. 2004, 32: e143-10.1093/nar/gnh136.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Chubb JR, Bloomfield G, Xu Q, Kaller M, Ivens A, Skelton J, Turner BM, Nellen W, Shaulsky G, Kay RR, et al: Developmental timing in Dictyostelium is regulated by the Set1 histone methyltransferase. Developmental biology. 2006, 292: 519-532. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.12.054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Smyth GK: Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004, 3: Article3-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Smyth GK, Michaud J, Scott HS: Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 2067-2075. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, et al: Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004, 5: R80-10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kooperberg C, Fazzio TG, Delrow JJ, Tsukiyama T: Improved background correction for spotted DNA microarrays. J Comput Biol. 2002, 9: 55-66. 10.1089/10665270252833190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Strmecki L, Bloomfield G, Araki T, Dalton E, Skelton J, Schilde C, Harwood A, Williams JG, Ivens A, Pears C: Proteomic and microarray analyses of the Dictyostelium Zak1-GSK-3 signaling pathway reveal a role in early development. Eukaryotic cell. 2007, 6: 245-252. 10.1128/EC.00204-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Greene et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement