Open Access

Developmentally regulated promoter-switch transcriptionally controls Runx1function during embryonic hematopoiesis

  • Amir Pozner1, 3,
  • Joseph Lotem1,
  • Cuiying Xiao1, 4,
  • Dalia Goldenberg1,
  • Ori Brenner2,
  • Varda Negreanu1,
  • Ditsa Levanon1 and
  • Yoram Groner1Email author
BMC Developmental Biology20077:84

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-7-84

Received: 13 February 2007

Accepted: 12 July 2007

Published: 12 July 2007

Abstract

Background

Alternative promoters usage is an important paradigm in transcriptional control of mammalian gene expression. However, despite the growing interest in alternative promoters and their role in genome diversification, very little is known about how and on what occasions those promoters are differentially regulated. Runx1 transcription factor is a key regulator of early hematopoiesis and a frequent target of chromosomal translocations in acute leukemias. Mice deficient in Runx1 lack definitive hematopoiesis and die in mid-gestation. Expression of Runx1 is regulated by two functionally distinct promoters designated P1 and P2. Differential usage of these two promoters creates diversity in distribution and protein-coding potential of the mRNA transcripts. While the alternative usage of P1 and P2 likely plays an important role in Runx1 biology, very little is known about the function of the P1/P2 switch in mediating tissue and stage specific expression of Runx1 during development.

Results

We employed mice bearing a hypomorphic Runx1 allele, with a largely diminished P2 activity, to investigate the biological role of alternative P1/P2 usage. Mice homozygous for the hypomorphic allele developed to term, but died within a few days after birth. During embryogenesis the P1/P2 activity is spatially and temporally modulated. P2 activity is required in early hematopoiesis and when attenuated, development of liver hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) was impaired. Early thymus development and thymopoiesis were also abrogated as reflected by thymic hypocellularity and loss of corticomedullary demarcation. Differentiation of CD4/CD8 thymocytes was impaired and their apoptosis was enhanced due to altered expression of T-cell receptors.

Conclusion

The data delineate the activity of P1 and P2 in embryogenesis and describe previously unknown functions of Runx1. The findings show unequivocally that the role of P1/P2 during development is non redundant and underscore the significance of alternative promoter usage in Runx1 biology.

Background

The mammalian RUNX1 belongs to the runt domain family of transcription factors. The members of this gene family, RUNX1, RUNX2 and RUNX3 are key regulators of lineage-specific gene expression in major developmental pathways [13]. The three RUNX proteins recognize the same DNA-motif and regulate their target genes through interaction with a common group of transcriptional co-activators or co-repressors [47]. Interestingly, however, the functional overlaps are minor and each RUNX protein has a distinct subset of biological functions. Accordingly, each of the corresponding RUNX knockout (KO) mice displays a unique subset of phenotypic abnormalities [3]. This lack of functional redundancy results from a tightly regulated spatio/temporal expression mediated by an intricate transcriptional control [3, 8]. For example, both Runx1 and Runx3 genes are expressed in developing dorsal root ganglia, but in different classes of sensory neurons [912] and both are expressed in mature T cells, but at different stages during T cell development [1315].

In the mouse embryo, expression of Runx1 is first detected in definitive hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) and in endothelial cells at HSC emergence sites [1618]. These occurrences correlate well with the earlier findings that homozygous disruption of Runx1 results in a complete absence of fetal liver hematopoiesis [19, 20]. Postnatally, Runx1 is highly expressed in several hematopoietic lineages including myeloid, B- and T-lymphoid cells [2, 21, 22] and is required for megakaryocytic maturation [23]. In contrast to the critical role of Runx1 during embryogenesis, it is less essential for adult hematopoiesis [2], albeit conditional inactivation is associated with a number of hematopoietic abnormalities including myeloproliferation [24].

Runx1 is also expressed in a number of other tissues at specific time windows during embryogenesis [2, 3]. However, due to the early (E12.5) lethality of homozygous null Runx1 mice [16, 19, 20], relatively little is known about the function of Runx1 in these tissues. In developing thymus Runx1 is more abundantly expressed in the cortex [9, 14] during early stages of thymopoiesis [13]. Transgenic mice that express a dominant-negative form of Runx1 display defects in maturation of single positive (SP) CD4 and SP CD8 thymocytes [25]. Additionally, naive T cells from these mice exhibited increased production of IL4, lack of GATA3 expression and enhanced Th2 differentiation of CD4+ helper-T cells [26]. Selective inactivation of Runx1 in T-cell progenitors demonstrated that Runx1 acts in double negative (DN) thymocytes to repress CD4 expression and to up-regulate CD8 as cells differentiate into the double positive (DP) thymocytes [13, 27]. ES cells bearing a mutant Runx1 lacking the C-terminal repression sub-domain, failed to adequately contribute to the thymus in chimera mice [28]. In the knock-in model of this mutant, the overall number of thymocytes was significantly reduced and the thymus contained a higher proportion of SP CD4 cells [28].

We have previously shown that transcription of Runx1 is regulated by two distantly located promoter regions designated P1 and P2 for the distal and proximal, respectively [29]. The P2 is nested within a particularly large and evolutionary conserved CpG island [3, 9], while no such CpG rich region is found in P1. The two promoters are regulated in a cell type-specific manner and respond to mitogenic stimulation [30, 31]. The P1- and P2-derived primary transcripts are processed into a diverse repertoire of alternatively spliced mRNAs that are differentially expressed in various cell types and at different developmental stages [3]. The P1 and P2 mRNAs differ at their 5'-coding regions [9, 31], and the resulting protein isoforms differ in their biological functions [1, 3234]. Similarly, a number of P2-derived splice-variants bear shorter reading frames that lack the transcriptional activation domain and can act in a dominant negative manner [31]. Forced expression of such isoforms results in transcriptional repression of Runx1 target genes [3537], and in blocking of myeloid differentiation [36]. Hence, differential usage of P1 versus P2 has a profound effect on the repertoire and nature of Runx1 isoforms in the cell, which likely impacts on the regulation of Runx1 target genes [8]. Significantly, disruption of P1 by the 12;21 chromosomal translocation results in the most common subtype of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia [38].

P1- and P2-transcripts also differ in the structure and function of their 5' untranslated region (5'UTR). The P1-5'UTR is relatively short and mediates cap-dependent translation, whereas the P2-5'UTR is particularly long, contains an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) and mediates cap-independent translation [3, 30]. These structurally and functionally different 5'UTRs could have a profound effect on translation efficiency of Runx1 mRNAs. Indeed, in cell lines where P2 transcription predominated, P2-5' IRES-dependent translation was more efficient than P1-5' cap-dependent translation [3, 30]. IRES-dependent translation is particularly important during development, in times when cap-dependent translation in proliferating or differentiating cells is down-regulated [39]. While it is clear that the regulation of Runx1 expression by alternative P1/P2 usage is a potentially key paradigm in the in vivo regulation of Runx1, very little is known about the role of the P1/P2 switch in mediating tissue and stage specific expression of Runx1 during development.

To investigate the biological function of the P1/P2 switch during embryogenesis, we generated mice bearing a hypomorphic Runx1 allele by inserting a neomycin (neo) gene into the P2 region (P2neo). Mice homozygous for the P2neo allele (P2neo/neo) displayed a markedly attenuated P2 activity. Nevertheless, these mutant mice developed to term, but newborns died within a few days after birth. We show that the P1/P2 switch is developmentally regulated and that the two promoters are alternatively used during embryogenesis. P2 mediated transcription is required during early thymopoiesis for the proper development of the thymus and for differentiation of DN and DP CD4/CD8 T cells. Attenuation of P2 activity results in impaired development of fetal liver hematopoietic precursors and in enhanced apoptosis of thymocytes due to altered expression of T-cell receptors (TCRs). The data describe previously unknown functions of Runx1, delineate the activity of P1 and P2 in embryogenesis, show unequivocally that their function during development is non redundant and underscore the significance of the two promoters in Runx1 biology.

Results

Generation of Runx1 P2neo/neomice and phenotypic analysis of mutant newborns

Null mutation in Runx1 results in embryonal lethality [19, 20]. As P2 activity starts early in embryogenesis (Levanon D. and Groner Y. unpublished), we envisaged a scenario in which germline inactivation of P2 will also result in embryonal death. To avoid this occurrence we explored means to selectively attenuate the activity of Runx1 P2. We have previously demonstrated that the genomic region upstream the transcription start sites of RUNX1 P2 was important for regulated transcription of RUNX1 in various cell lines [29, 30]. We thus assessed whether insertion of a neo cassette into this region affects P2 activity in transfected cells (See additional file 1: Fig. 1A and 1B for constructs, results and methods). Transfection experiments indicated that insertion of a neo cassette into the P2 region specifically attenuated P2-mediated transcription in several cell lines and encouraged us to utilize this approach for evaluating the biological activity of Runx1 P2 in vivo.
Figure 1

Attenuated Runx1 P2 expression in P2 neo/neo embryos impaired thymus development. (A) RT-PCR analysis of RNA from kidney and stomach of E16.5 WT and P2neo/neo embryos, and from tongue of P1.5 WT and P2neo/neo neonates. P2-mediated transcription in P2neo/neo tissues diminished, whereas P1-mediated transcription was largely unaffected. (B) IHC analysis of glandular stomach of E16.5 WT (left) and P2neo/neo (right) embryos. Runx1 expression is detected in epithelial cells of WT embryo, but missing in P2neo/neo littermate (10× magnification). (C) Reduced size of thymic lobes in P1.5 P2neo/neo mice (right) as compared to WT littermate (left). (D) RT-PCR analysis of Runx1 P1- and P2-mediated transcription in thymus of WT embryos, neonates and young mice. (E) Analysis of Runx1 expression by In-situ hybridization of E15.5 WT (left) and P2neo/neo (right) thymic sections, using the P2-5'UTR probe. P2-derived transcripts are clearly visible in the cortex of E16.5 WT, but not of P2neo/neo (10× magnification). (co) = cortex; (me) = medulla. (F) Western blot analysis of proteins extracted from thymus of E15.5–E17.5 WT and P2neo/neo embryos. Runx1 proteins were not detected in E15.5 P2neo/neo thymus, but gradually accumulated in E16.5 and E17.5 thymi. (G) Northern blot analysis of RNA from thymi of WT and P2neo/neo newborn mice. Whereas P2-mediated transcription (the 4 Kb and 8 Kb transcripts) [30, 31], in P2neo/neo thymocytes was markedly attenuated, P1-mediated transcription (the 2 Kb and 6 Kb transcripts) was apparently unaffected. (H) Reduced thymus cellularity in P2neo/neo embryos and neonates. Five mice of each genotype were analyzed. The difference between the number of thymocytes from WT and P2neo/neo thymus was significant at P < 0.0001 (*) and P < 0.05 (#) by Student's t test.

Runx1 P2 was targeted in ES cells using a construct in which the neo cassette was placed at the same site as in the P2neo-Ren construct (Additional file 1), but in a transcriptional orientation opposite to that of Runx1, and was flanked by lox P sites (Additional file 2A). Homologous recombination yielded ES clones (Additional file 2B), which were used to generate several Runx1P2neo/+ chimeric males that passed on the Runx1 mutation through the germ line. Mating F2 heterozygotes with 129/Sv, ICR or MF1 mice generated Runx1P2neo/neo mice with an inbred or a mixed background. Heterozygous Runx1P2neo/+ (P2neo/+) mice appeared phenotypically indistinguishable from their WT littermates. However, homozygous Runx1P2neo/neo (P2neo/neo) neonates were reduced in size, gained little weight and most of them died 2 to 3 days post natally (Additional file 2D).

To further characterize the phenotype/genotype relationships of the mutant mice, heterozygotes P2neo/+ mice were mated with two different strains of transgenic mice expressing Cre driven by either PGK or EIIa promoters [40, 41] (Additional file 2B). The resulting heterozygotes bearing the remaining loxP sequence within the P2-XbaI site were mated and offspring homozygous to P2-loxP were obtained at the expected Mendelian proportion (25%). Significantly, Runx1P2loxP/loxP (P2loxP/loxP) mice were indistinguishable form WT littermates indicating that the early lethality phenotype of P2neo/neo newborns was due to the presence of the neo cassette in the P2 region.

Attenuated Runx1 expression in P2neo/neomice

The above-described phenotypic manifestation of the P2neo/neo allele posed a question as to how the expression level of Runx1 was affected. To address this issue, Runx1 expression in various tissues was examined using RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RNA in situ hybridization (RISH) (Fig. 1). In tissues of P2neo/neo mice, such as kidney and tongue, where Runx1 expression is normally mediated by both P1 and P2, only P1-transcripts were detected (Fig. 1A). In contrast, no Runx1 expression was detected by either RT-PCR or IHC in developing gastric epithelium where only P2 is normally active (Figs. 1A and 1B). P2neo is therefore a hypomorphic allele of Runx1 in which P2 activity is largely diminished. Interestingly, however, no developmental abnormalities were detected by macroscopic and histological examination of kidney, stomach and tongue of mutant embryos or newborns. The most obvious and consistent macroscopic abnormality was a profound reduction in size of the thymus of newborn P2neo/neo mice as compared to WT (Fig. 1C).

Western blot analysis, RISH using a P2 specific probe and RT-PCR showed that during early thymogenesis (embryonal day (E) 14.5–16.5) transcription of Runx1 in WT thymus was predominately mediated by P2 (Fig. 1D), and that at this stage almost no Runx1 was detected in P2neo/neo thymus (Figs. 1E and 1F). The P1 activity in WT thymus was switched-on between E15.5–E17.5 and persisted thereafter, whereas the activity of P2, which predominated during embryogenesis, gradually decreased after birth (Fig. 1D). Importantly, once switched-on the P1 activity was apparently unaffected in P2neo/neo mice, as evidenced by northern blot analysis of Runx1 mRNAs in newborns (Fig. 1G). Together, the complementary results of Runx1 expression studies and morphological analyses showed that expression of Runx1 in P2neo/neo mice was compromised both temporally and spatially, resulting in adverse effect on thymus development.

Impaired thymus development in Runx1 P2neo/neomice

Thymus development in mouse embryo begins at E9.5 ensued by immigration of lymphocyte precursors into the thymic rudiment at E14.5. Development proceeds through stage specific interactions between thymocytes and thymic epithelium that are essential for the formation of thymic architecture [42]. Runx1 is highly expressed in developing thymocytes, but not in thymic epithelium [9, 13, 14].

Macroscopic examinations revealed that thymi of P2neo/neo neonates were about one-third of the normal size (Figs. 2I and 2K). This diminished size was caused by a profound reduction in the number of thymocytes during mutant thymus development (Fig. 1H). Histological examinations revealed no gross morphological differences between P2neo/neo and WT at E14.5 and E15.5 (Figs. 2A and 2C), except for scattered cysts in P2neo/neo thymi (Fig. 2C). These cysts are thought to result from accelerated epithelial turnover within centers of epithelial islands [43]. At E16.5 however, extensive histological differences between WT and P2neo/neo emerged (Fig. 2E). WT thymus had a clear demarcation of cortex and medulla. WT cortex was densely cellular with small hyperchromatic thymocytes, while the medulla was paler, contained a lower number of thymocytes admixed with macrophages, epithelial cells, and antigen presenting cells (Fig. 2E). Mutant thymus, on the other hand, was much smaller, hypocellular, had a scalloped capsular surface and consisted predominantly of epithelial cells, with no evidence of an organized cortex and medulla. At E17.5 the histological defects were even more pronounced; the P2neo/neo thymus still lacked corticomedullary organization and contained occasional cysts (Fig. 2G).
Figure 2

Histological and IHC analysis of thymus development in WT and P2 neo/neo mice. (A, C, E, G, I, K) Transverse sections of WT (left panels) and P2neo/neo (right panels) thymic lobes stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). co = cortex, me = medulla, scb = sub-cortical band, cy = cyst. (B, D, F, H, J, L) Immunostaining of Runx1 in sections of WT (left panels) and P2neo/neo (right panels) thymic lobes. Runx1 is detected in thymocytes, but not in thymic epithelium. A reduced number of Runx1 expressing thymocytes (that are abnormally distributed) is seen in P2neo/neo thymic lobes.

IHC using anti Runx1 antibodies revealed a lower number of Runx1 positive cells in E14.5 and E15.5 P2neo/neo thymi compared to WT (Figs. 2B and 2D). Runx1 is mostly expressed in DN CD4-/CD8- immature thymocytes, where it regulates CD4 expression [13, 25, 28]. IHC of E15.5–E16.5 WT thymus revealed that these Runx1 positive immature thymocytes were predominantly in the cortex and less in the medulla (Figs. 2D and 2F), as also shown by the RNA in-situ hybridization data (Fig. 1E). In P2neo/neo thymus on the other hand, the fewer Runx1 positive cells were scattered randomly within the organ (Fig. 2D). At E17.5 most of Runx1 expressing DN CD4-/CD8- thymocytes were found in the sub-cortical band (SCB), whereas the cortical, DP CD4+/CD8+ thymocytes did not express Runx1 (Fig. 2H). In E17.5 P2neo/neo thymus, many Runx1 positive cells were still in the cortex and only after birth, when the mutant thymus gradually gained WT morphology, were Runx1 expressing hyperchromatic cells seen in the SCB (Figs. 2J and 2L). But even then, the overall size of mutant thymus remained much smaller compared to WT (Figs. 2I and 2K). The data indicate that normal embryonal thymopoiesis depends on a proper P2-mediated transcription of Runx1 which when attenuated during the E14.5–E16.5 time period results in impaired thymus development.

Increased apoptosis in embryonal P2neo/neothymocytes

To directly assess whether the thymic hypocellularity of P2neo/neo embryos was a consequence of enhanced cell death, the proportion of apoptotic thymocytes was determined by flow cytometry. At E14.5 a much higher proportion of P2neo/neo thymocytes (63% ± 5) compared to WT (28% ± 8) bound annexin V, indicating increased apoptosis among P2neo/neo thymocytes (Fig. 3A). Additionally, increased proportion of necrotic cells positive to both annexin V and propidium iodid (PI), was observed in P2neo/neo thymus (15% ± 3 P2neo/neo; 10% ± 2 WT, Fig. 3A). The enhanced cell death of E14.5 P2neo/neo thymocytes led to a three-fold reduction in the proportion of viable thymocytes in mutant thymus (WT 61.0% ± 5; P2neo/neo 21.9% ± 3). At E16.5–17.5 the P1 promoter is switched on (Figs. 1D and 1F), expression of Runx1 in P2neo/neo thymocytes increased (Figs. 2F and 2H) and recovery of thymopoiesis commenced. The end result was an increased proportion of viable P2neo/neo thymocytes at E17.5 almost to WT level (Fig. 3A). The enhanced apoptosis in P2neo/neo E14.5 and E15.5 thymus was also demonstrated by in situ TUNEL labeling and IHC of activated caspase-3 (not shown). The proportion of non-viable thymocytes at various stages of thymus development is shown in Fig. 3B. At early stages, apoptosis was significantly higher in P2neo/neo fetuses compared to WT, but gradually declined concomitant with the increase in P1-mediated expression of Runx1.
Figure 3

P2 neo/neo thymocytes display enhanced apoptosis, but have normal cell proliferation capacity. (A) FACS analysis of E14.5 and E17.5 WT (left panels) and P2neo/neo (right panels) thymocytes stained with Annexin V and PI. FACS dot plots and percentages of cells in each quadrant are indicated. Note the >2 fold increase in the proportion of apoptotic cells (Annexin V+/PI-) and of necrotic cells (Annexin V+/PI+) in P2neo/neo thymi. (B) P2neo/neo thymocytes display enhanced apoptosis throughout embryonic thymopoiesis. Proportion of non-viable (apoptotic+necrotic) WT and P2neo/neo cells gradually decreased during embryonic development. Nevertheless, at any given time point, P2neo/neo thymui contained a higher proportion of non-viable cells compared to WT littermates. After birth the proportion of non-viable thymocytes in P2neo/neo became similar to WT. At least five mice of each genotype were analyzed. The differences between WT and P2neo/neo apoptotic thymocytes were significant at P < 0.001 (*) and P < 0.01 (#) by Student's t test. (C) P2neo/neo thymocytes retain normal proliferation capacity. Following FACS analysis an equal number (1 × 104) of E15.5 WT or P2neo/neo Annexin V negative thymocytes were incubated with TPA (20 ng/ml) and ConA (5 μg/ml) for 48 h. 3H-thymidine was present during the last 18 h of incubation. Differences between WT and P2neo/neo were statistically insignificant by Student's t test. Proliferation capability of thymocytes was further examined by immunostaining of E15.5 thymic lobes for the proliferation-associated antigen recognized by Ki-67 antibodies (Right panels). (D) Enhanced embryonal apoptosis is a cell-autonomous property of P2neo/neo thymocytes. WT or P2neo/neo E15.5 FL HPC were differentiated under saturating conditions in E14.5 WT FTOC for 14 or 16 days. We predetermined that ~100 FL cells (either WT or P2neo/neo) per lobe were sufficient to populate all available thymic lobes and therefore used 1000 FL cells per lobe. Thymocytes accumulation in FTOC populated with P2neo/neo FL HPC is reduced compared to WT (left panel WT-black; P2neo/neo-white). Proportion of apoptotic thymocytes (Annexin V+) derived from FTOC populated with P2neo/neo FL cells (red) was considerably higher compared to WT (light blue) (right panel).

We next asked whether the proliferative capacity of P2neo/neo thymocytes was also affected. E15.5 thymocytes were isolated, analyzed by FACS and similar numbers of viable cells cultured in-vitro under proliferation stimulating conditions (Fig. 3C). Purified P2neo/neo and WT thymocytes displayed a similar thymidine incorporation rate, indicating that the ability of thymocytes to proliferate was hardly affected by the attenuated expression of Runx1 during early thymopoiesis. This conclusion was supported by immunostaining of thymocytes with the cell proliferation-associated antigen Ki-67. In E15.5 P2neo/neo thymus the number of Ki-67 positive cells was lower than in WT (Fig. 3C), reflecting the hypocellularity of mutant thymus (Fig. 2D). Nevertheless, significant numbers of P2neo/neo thymocytes did express Ki-67, indicating normal progression through the cell cycle. Together, these results show that P2neo/neo thymocytes possess proliferation and cell cycle progression capabilities similar to WT, but attenuating Runx1 expression during early developmental stages rendered thymocytes more susceptible to apoptosis, leading to thymic hypocellularity.

To address whether the increased apoptosis of P2neo/neo thymocytes was due to loss of a cell-autonomous function of Runx1, we examined the capacity of P2neo/neo thymocytes to populate fetal thymic organ culture (FTOC). E14.5 WT thymic lobes were reconstituted, at a saturating cell number, with either WT or P2neo/neo E15.5 fetal liver (FL) cells that contain hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC). At FTOC day 14 and 16, cells were extracted out of the lobes and analyzed by FACS for Annexin V binding. P2neo/neo HPC gave rise to a significantly lower number of FTOC cells compared to WT and most P2neo/neo derived cells were Annexin Vhigh (Fig. 3D). These data further demonstrated the intrinsic requirement for P2-mediated expression of Runx1 during early embryonal thymopoiesis.

The enhanced apoptosis of P2neo/neothymocytes is associated with increased expression of TCRβ/TCRγδ

The above results raised the question of how does attenuated expression of Runx1 cause the increased apoptosis of P2neo/neo thymocytes. The majority of immature thymocytes with a non-productive rearrangement of TCRβ gene die through Fas/Fas ligand-mediated apoptosis [44]. Only a small subset of immature thymocytes with productive TCRβ or γδ rearrangement are selected for further maturation associated with rapid proliferation [4548]. Interestingly, the percentage of TCRβ/TCRγδ expressing thymocytes was significantly higher in E14.5 to E17.5 P2neo/neo fetuses compared to WT (Figs. 4A and 4B), as was the mean-fluorescence-intensity (MFI) level of TCRβ+ thymocytes (Fig. 4B). These data indicate an enhanced TCRβ/γδ expression on P2neo/neo thymocytes compared to WT during the early stages of embryonal thymopoiesis.
Figure 4

The propensity of P2 neo/neo thymocytes to undergo apoptosis is associated with elevated expression of TCRβ and TCRγδ. (A and B) Expression of TCRβ and TCRγδ on WT and P2neo/neo embryonal thymocytes. (A) Shown are FACS analysis dot plots of E15.5 to E18.5 WT and P2neo/neo thymocytes indicating the percentages of cells in each quadrant. Histograms in (B) show the average ± S.E. of TCRβ/TCRγδ proportions of WT and P2neo/neo thymocytes in at least three experiments at each developmental stage. The difference between WT and P2neo/neo was significant at P < 0.005 (*) and P < 0.05 (#) by Student's t test. While at E15.5 to E17.5 the proportion of TCRβ/TCRγδ expressing thymocytes was much higher in P2neo/neo compared to WT, at E18.5 the distribution of P2neo/neo thymocytes resumed normal pattern. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) (B right) of E15.5 and E16.5 TCRβ+ P2neo/neo thymocytes was significantly higher than WT (p < 0.005; by Student's t test). (C) Expression of TCRβ/TCRγδ in P2neo/neo thymocytes is transcriptionally upregulated. RT-PCR analysis of RNA derived from WT and P2neo/neo E16.5 thymocytes using primers specific for the pre-TCRα and the constant regions of TCRβ and TCRγ transcripts. Increased number of PCR cycles shows elevated steady-state levels of mRNAs in P2neo/neo thymocytes compared to WT. (D and E) Enhanced apoptosis of P2neo/neo thymocytes is associated with elevated expression of TCRβ/TCRγδ. (D) Histograms demonstrating the proportion of apoptotic cells among TCRβ+ or TCRgδ+ thymocytes. TCRβ/TCRγδ positive WT thymocytes (blue) are divided into two main populations, apoptotic (M1) and non-apoptotic, according to level of Annexin V (except for E15.5 TCRγδ+ where all cells are apoptotic). Most of TCRβ/TCRγδ positive P2neo/neo thymocytes (red), are at the M1 (Annexin Vhigh) apoptotic subset. (E) Proportion of apoptotic thymocytes among TCRβ/TCRγδ positive E15.5, E16.5 and E18.5 thymocytes. Bars represent the average ± S.E. of at least three independent experiments for each time point using different mice. The differences between WT and P2neo/neo in number of TCRβ+ apoptotic thymocytes were significant at P < 0.01 (*) by Student's t test.

Runx1 acts in transfected cells as a negative regulator of TCRβ transcription [4]. It is thus possible that the diminished Runx1 expression between E14.5 to E16.5 caused de-repression of TCR transcription in P2neo/neo thymocytes, leading to the increased level of TCRβ/γδ. Supporting this assumption are data demonstrating that upregulation of TCRβ/γδ in P2neo/neo thymocytes occurred at the transcriptional level (Fig. 4C), and that down regulation to WT levels occurred at E18.5 (Fig. 4A and 4B), upon turning-on of P1 (Fig. 1).

We next addressed whether increased expression of TCRβ/γδ in P2neo/neo thymocytes was associated with the increased susceptibility to apoptosis of the mutant cells. Annexin V staining was monitored in fractionated TCRβ+ or TCRγδ+ thymocytes (Figure 4D). In E15.5 and E16.5 embryos 50–65% of WT and 80–90% of P2neo/neo TCRβ+ thymocytes were apoptotic as were ~95% of both WT and P2neo/neo TCRγδ+ thymocytes (Figs. 4D and 4E). Additionally, at these developmental stages a significantly higher proportion of P2neo/neo thymocytes express the TCRs (Figs. 4A and 4B). Thus, the enhanced apoptosis in P2neo/neo compared to WT thymus (Figures 3A and 3B), was closely associated with an increase in TCRβ/γδ expression. Of note, MFI of Annexin V+ apoptotic P2neo/neo thymocytes, was lower compared to the WT (Figure 4D), presumably due to a lower level of cell surface phosphatidyl-serine in P2neo/neo cells.

Together, the complementary outcome of these experiments indicates that Runx1 functions in vivo as a negative regulator of TCR expression. When the temporal expression of Runx1 is attenuated, levels of TCRβ+/TCRγδ+ thymocytes increase, which may lead to enhanced cell death. When P1 is turned-on, restoring Runx1 expression in P2neo/neo cells, apoptosis in mutant thymocytes assumes normal levels.

Impaired thymocyte differentiation in P2neo/neoembryos

We next employed flow cytometry to study thymocyte differentiation in P2neo/neo embryos and neonates. First we examined the CD4/CD8 double negative (DN) population at E15.5 when nearly 100% of thymocytes are DN. The DN population is divided into four sub-groups, DN1 to DN4, according to the expression of CD25 and CD44 surface markers. Compared to WT, P2neo/neo embryos displayed an increase in the proportion of DN3 (CD25+/CD44-) thymocytes and a corresponding reduction in DN4 cells (CD25-/CD44-) (Fig. 5A), resulting in a significant increase in the ratio DN3/DN4 among P2neo/neo thymocytes (WT DN3/DN4 = 0.65 ± 0.15 and P2neo/neo = 1.51 ± 0.31; P < 0.001). To examine P1/P2 usage in the DN sub-groups we used flow cytometry to sort E15.5 thymocytes based on surface expression of CD25 and CD44 (as shown in Fig. 5A), and levels of P1 and P2 transcripts was determined. The levels of P1 and P2 expression did not differ significantly between DN3 and DN4 subgroups and was similar to the level shown in Fig. 1D.
Figure 5

P2-mediated expression of Runx1 is required for embryonal thymopoiesis. (A) Distribution of CD44/CD25 expressing thymocytes of E15.5 WT and P2neo/neo embryos. Representative data of five different experiments are shown as FACS dot plots; percentages of cells in each quadrant are indicated. (B) Distribution of embryonic and neonatal CD4/CD8 thymocytes. WT and P2neo/neo thymocytes of E16.5 and E17.5 embryos and day 1.5 and 3.5 neonates were analyzed. Representative data of five different experiments are shown as FACS dot plots; percentages of cells in each quadrant are indicated.

Next we examined the CD8/CD4 double positive population. At E16.5, P2neo/neo embryos displayed a 2.5-fold reduction in the proportion of double positive (DP) CD4+/CD8+ thymocytes as compared to WT (Fig. 5B). At E17.5 the decrease in proportion of DP thymocytes in P2neo/neo embryos was more pronounced and accompanied by a marked increase in an abnormal population of CD4+/CD8low cells (Fig. 5B). A similar subpopulation of immature CD4+/CD8low was previously observed in mice with thymocyte specific targeting of Runx1 [13, 28] and in mice bearing a hypomorphic Cbfβ allele [49]. It was postulated that this abnormal CD4+/CD8low population represents immature DP thymocytes in which CD8 expression was diminished and CD4 expression was partially de-repressed [13]. Delayed differentiation of P2neo/neo thymocytes was still apparent at post-natal day (P) 1.5 (Fig. 5B), but recovery to WT proportions was noted at P3.5.

Taken together, the change in the proportion of DN3/DN4 thymocytes at early thymopoiesis, the decrease in DP CD4/CD8 thymocytes and the increase in the abnormal SP CD4+/CD8low population, indicate that during embryonal thymopoiesis P2 activity is also required for regulation of CD4/CD8 expression and thereby for the proper differentiation of DN and DP thymocytes.

Reduction in committed T-cell precursors (TCPs) in P2neo/neofetuses

Runx1 is essential for embryonal hematopoiesis and Runx1-/- mice lack definitive hematopoiesis as well as hemapoietic colony forming activity in vitro [16, 17, 19, 20]. In developing FL, Runx1 is expressed in HSC and in early progenitors [9, 16, 17], and in WT FL both promoters are active (Fig. 6A and [50]. In hematopoietic FL cells of P2neo/neo embryos, P1-transcription was not affected, as was noted earlier for P2neo/neo thymocytes (Fig. 1G), whereas P2 activity was largely attenuated (Fig. 6A). To assess hematopoietic activity, individual FLs from WT and P2neo/neo embryos were isolated and analyzed for in vitro colony formation. As shown in Fig. 6B, the number of colonies grown in P2neo/neo cultures was significantly lower compared to WT. However, because the size of the colonies in P2neo/neo and WT cultures was similar (data not shown), the results indicate that P2neo/neo FL cells contained fewer progenitors compared to WT. This conclusion was supported by the finding that E17.5 and E18.5 P2neo/neo embryos showed marked reduction (~50 ± 3%) in the proportion of Gr-1+/CD18+ and CD11a+/CD11b+ cells compared to WT littermates (Fig. 6C and data not shown).
Figure 6

P2-mediated embryonal expression of Runx1 is required for development of FL HPC. (A) RT-PCR analysis of RNA from E13.5 FL cells of WT and P2neo/neo embryos. P2-mediated transcription in P2neo/neo was largely attenuated, whereas P1-mediated transcription was apparently unaffected. (B) Colony forming activity of FL hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Colonies (>30 cells in size) were scored on day 7 of incubation. Shown are average numbers of colonies per FL ± S.E. of at least three different WT or P2neo/neo embryos at E12.5 and E13.5. The difference between WT and P2neo/neo colony number is significant (*) at P < 0.001 by Student's t test. (C and D) Altered expression of surface antigens on P2neo/neo FL HPC. (C) Expression profiles of Gr-1, CD18, CD11b, CD11a, CD44 and c-Kit, in FL HPC from E17.5 WT and P2neo/neo embryos. Representative data of at least three different experiments are shown as FACS dot plots; percentages of cells in each quadrant are indicated. Note the 2-fold decrease in the proportions of Gr-1+/CD18+ and CD11a+/CD11b+ (left panels) as well as CD44+/c-Kit+ (right panel), FL cells in P2neo/neo compared to WT. (D) Proportion of CD34+ FL HPC. Profiles of WT and P2neo/neo FL HPC, filled (blue) and unfilled (red) histograms, respectively, at E14.5, E16.5 and E18.5. Shown are representative results of at least three different experiments. Numbers at the upper right corners are percentages of CD34+ cells in WT (upper) and P2neo/neo (lower). Note the marked decrease in the proportions of P2neo/neo CD34+ HPC. (E) Analysis of committed FL T-cell precursors (TCPs). FACS analysis showing the distribution of B220+/c-Kit+/CD19- FL HPC of E15.5 WT and P2neo/neo embryos. Gated CD19- precursors (R1) were analyzed for c-Kit and B220 expression. Note the 4-fold decrease in the proportions of c-Kit+/B220low/D19- TCPs (R2) in P2neo/neo FL HPC. Data shown on the right are average ± S.E. of four independent experiments using four different mice. The difference between the percentages of TCPs from WT and P2neo/neo FL HPC is significant at P < 0.005 by Student's t test. (F) Reduced capacity of P2neo/neo FL HPC to colonize FTOC. Isolated E15.5 FL HPC from WT or P2neo/neo embryos were set to differentiate, under limiting dilution conditions, for 16 days in E14.5 WT FTOC. Shown are percentage of unsuccessfully populated lobes per cultured cells and the calculated frequencies of three different independent experiments.

We next assessed the effect of the P2neo/neo hypomorph on the development of FL HPC. Runx1 expressing FL HPC also express CD34, c-Kit and CD44 [16, 17]. In E17.5 and E18.5 P2neo/neo embryos, a 2-fold reduction in the proportion of CD44+/c-Kit+ HPC compared to WT littermates was observed (Fig. 6C), and even greater reduction was observed in CD34 positive cells at E14.5–E18.5 (Fig. 6D and data not shown). FL HPC that are B220low/c-kit+/CD19- represent an HPC population restricted to the T-cell and natural killer cell lineages [51]. These FL progenitors, termed T-cell precursors (TCPs), are thought to represent the immediate developmental step before thymic immigration. Because the hypocellularity of P2neo/neo thymus was noted at the earliest developmental stages (Figs. 1H and 2B), the proportion of TCPs in WT and P2neo/neo was compared. FACS analysis of B220low/c-kit+/CD19- E15.5 FL cells, revealed a fourfold reduction in the proportion of P2neo/neo TCPs compared to WT (Fig. 6E). These results indicated that the proportion of Runx1 expressing FL HPC, particularly the TCP subset, was markedly reduced in P2neo/neo compared to WT. This conclusion was supported by in vitro FTOC progenitor assay, which monitors the capacity of FL TCPs to reconstitute thymic lobes [5154] (Fig. 6F). When E15.5 WT and P2neo/neo FL cells were cultured under limiting dilution conditions in FTOCs, the frequency of successfully populated thymic lobes was lower for P2neo/neo TCPs as compared to WT (~1 in 47 P2neo/neo cells vs. 1 in 28 WT cells) (Fig. 6F).

Additionally, when day 16 FTOCs cells were obtained and CD4/CD8 positive cells analyzed by FACS, an abnormal differentiation of P2neo/neo thymocytes was observed with increased proportion of the abnormal population DP CD4+/CD8low and a twofold reduction in the proportion of SP CD4+ or CD8+ compared to WT (not shown). This FTOC result corresponds well with the in vivo delayed maturation of P2neo/neo fetal thymocytes described in Fig. 5. Collectively, these data indicate that in P2neo/neo embryos the development of FL HPC of different lineages was impaired.

Runx1 P2neo allele failed to rescue the embryonal lethality phenotype of Runx1-/-mice

Homozygous disruption of Runx1 results in a complete absence of FL hematopoiesis and the mice die between E11.5 and E12.5 of hemorrhages in the central nervous system [19, 20]. P2neo/neo mice were born and showed no sign of hemorrhages, indicating that expression levels of Runx1 in homozygous P2neo/neo during early embryogenesis were sufficient to rescue the Runx1-/- phenotype. This occurrence raised the question of whether Runx1 levels provided by activity of a single P1 will also be sufficient to rescue the null phenotype. To address this issue we generated a compound mutant strain Runx1lz; Runx1P2neo by mating Runx1lz/+ mice [16] with Runx1P2neo/+. These mice had one null allele expressing a fused Runx1-LacZ protein and one P2neo allele expressing WT P1 (Fig. 7A). Compound mutant Runx1lz;Runx1P2neo embryos died between E11.5 and E12.5 and suffered from hemorrhages in the nervous system (Fig. 7B). The most extensive bleedings was seen in the 4th ventricle, the ventral metencephalon and spinal cord. Moreover, the liver of E12.5 compound mutant embryos was depleted of hematopoietic cells (Fig. 7C), indicating lack of definitive hematopoiesis, similar to the previously reported Runx1-/- phenotype [16, 19, 20]. These results indicated, that during midgestation, angiogenesis and definitive hematopoiesis are highly sensitive to the dosage of Runx1 as activity of a single P1 was not sufficient to rescue the Runx1-/- phenotype. This conclusion is consistent with the previously reported data which was based on transplantation assays [17, 18, 55]. This observation may also pertain to the unique role of P2 activity during midgestation angiogenesis and/or early hematopoiesis.
Figure 7

Runx1 P2 neo allele failed to rescue the embryonal lethality phenotype of Runx1 -/- mice. (A) Schematic representation of Runx1 locus in the two Runx1 mutant strains used to generate the compound mutant strain Runx1lz;Runx1P2neo. (B) Runx1lz;Runx1P2neo die at E11.5 to E12.5 due to hemorrhages in the CNS and/or lack of FL hematopoiesis. Left: Lateral view of a whole mount compound Runx1lz;Runx1P2neo E11.5 embryo stained for β-galactosidase activity. Hemorrhages are seen in the 4th ventricle, the ventral metencephalon and spinal cord. Right: Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of a section through the spinal cord exhibits focal hemorrhage (arrow head). (C) H&E staining of WT (left view) and Runx1lz;Runx1P2neo (right view) E12.5 fetal liver. Note the absence of definitive hematopoietic precursors (deep purple cells) in Runx1lz;Runx1P2neo FL as compared to WT. The data demonstrate that activity of a single Runx1 P1 was not sufficient to rescue the embryonal lethal phenotype of Runx1-/- mice.

Early lethality phenotype of P2neo/neoneonates is rescued by excision of the neo cassette in early T cell progenitors

As noted earlier, P2neo/neo neonates die within a few days after birth. The reasons for this early lethality are not clear. While P2-mediated expression diminished in several P2neo/neo tissues, including stomach, intestine and kidney (Fig. 1), the most striking abnormalities were noted in thymic development and thymopoiesis. We thus addressed whether these abnormalities could be rescued by specific removal of the neo cassette in early thymopoiesis and whether this occurrence will extend the life span of P2neo/neo neonates. Runx1-P2neo/neo mice were mated with a Lck-cre transgenic line [56] to excise the neo and regain P2 activity in thymocytes (Fig. 8A). Contrary to P2neo/neo mice, the P2/Lck-Cre mice developed normally and outwardly were indistinguishable from WT littermates. Nevertheless, embryonal thymopoiesis of P2/Lck-Cre was not completely normal and embryos exhibited a lower number of Runx1 expressing thymocytes (Figs. 8B and 8C). This may be due to an incomplete excision of the neo cassette in all T cell progenitors. Significantly, however, Runx1 expression level in P2/Lck-Cre was sufficient to allow for normal thymic development. Of note, P2-mediated Runx1 expression in other Runx1 expressing cells, such as epithelial cells, was not rescued in P2/Lck-Cre mice (Fig. 8D and data not shown).
Figure 8

Rescue of P2 neo/neo dependent thymic defect by T-cell specific removal of the neo cassette. (A) Specific excision of the neo cassette in P2/Lck-Cre mice. Southern blot analysis using a probe spanning the region indicated by the red bar assessed the level of neo excision in thymocytes, stomach epithelium and splenocytes of 4 week-old P2/Lck-Cre mice. The positions of XbaI cleavage sites are shown (X). The probe hybridized to a 3.4 Kb- and a 5.4 Kb XbaI genomic fragments derived from WT and P2neo/neo allele, respectively. Insertion/excision of the neo cassette by Lck-Cre eliminated the middle XbaI site (shown in WT as bold blue) generating the 4.6 Kb fragment derived from the P2/Lck-Cre allele. (B) Regeneration of thymus cellularity in P2/Lck-Cre mice. At day-1.5 the number of thymocytes in P2/Lck-Cre thymic lobes was near normal compared to WT littermates. Data shown are average ± S.E. of five independent experiments using five mice of each genotype (WT, P2neo/neo and P2/Lck-Cre). The difference between WT and P2neo/neo is significant at P < 0.001 by Student's t test. (C) Recovery of thymopoiesis and thymic organogenesis in P2/Lck-Cre embryos. Histological analysis and Runx1 expression in thymic lobes derived from E15.5 and E16.5 WT, P2neo/neo and P2/Lck-Cre embryos. Shown are H&E stained transverse sections immunostained for Runx1. (D) Runx1 expression was not rescued in P2/Lck-Cre epithelial cells. IHC analysis of Runx1 expression in esophagi derived from E16.5 WT, P2neo/neo and P2/Lck-Cre embryos. Transverse sections showing Runx1 expression in epithelial cells lining the lumen of WT (arrow), but not of P2neo/neo or P2/Lck-Cre esophagus. Several other tissues including stomach and nasal cavity were similarly analyzed and revealed no expression of Runx1 in epithelia of P2neo/neo or P2/Lck-Cre mice (not shown).

Discussion

Runx1 is an important cell-linage specific regulator of definitive hematopoiesis and thymopoiesis. The unique spatio/temporal expression pattern of Runx1 is attained through alternative usage of its two promoters, P1 and P2 [29, 30, 57] that also impacts on translation efficacy and repertoire of protein isoforms [30, 57]. While it was clear that transcriptional regulation of Runx1 expression is an important element of its biological function, little was known about the role of the two promoters during development, and about how and when they are differentially regulated. Is the alternative promoter usage of human and mouse RUNX1/Runx1 a reflection of vertebrates' higher complexity? Differential usage of alternative promoters enables diversified transcriptional regulation within a single locus and may thus serve as a molecular basis for the higher complexity of certain vertebrates' systems, such as the immune system. Indeed, while the RUNX genes are highly conserved throughout the animal kingdom, more primitive animals such as the nematode C. elegance and the sea urchin contain only one gene regulated by a single promoter [3, 8]. This single promoter is the equivalent of vertebrates' P2.

Differential P1/P2 usage during embryogenesis

The use of hypomorphic alleles for studying essential genes at the organismal level is a well-established approach. We employed mice homozygous for a hypomorphic Runx1 allele, which caused a profound attenuation of P2 activity, to investigate the biological role of P2 during embryogenesis. Specifically, we analyzed the impact of the resulting hypomorphic Runx1 expression on FL HPC development and early thymopoiesis. We found that during embryogenesis Runx1 is developmentally regulated through alternative usage of P1 and P2. In certain tissues, including kidney, tongue and liver both P1 and P2 are active, whereas in others such as intestinal epithelium and early thymocytes P2 activity predominates. Contrary to Runx1 null mice, in which embryonic lethality occurs at ~E12.5 [19, 20], P2neo/neo mice develop to term, implying that during early development the activity of P1 prevails. This conclusion is supported by the finding that both P1- and P2-transcripts are found in FL of E12.5 embryos [50]. The notion that both P1 and P2 are active during early hematopoiesis correlates well with the finding that P2neo/neo embryos displayed moderate and severe hematopoietic defects in the liver and thymus, respectively.

P2 activity is essential for embryonal thymopoiesis and thymus development

Thymic development in the mouse begins at ~E9.5 [42]. Runx1 is highly expressed in thymocytes, but not in thymus epithelium [9, 13, 14]. Using in-situ hybridization, RT-PCR and IHC we demonstrate that during early thymopoiesis activity of P2 predominates. The P1 is upregulated at E17.5 and its activity persists thereafter, while the activity of P2 declines after birth. At E11 the thymic rudiment is colonized by the first wave of committed T-cell precursors (TCP) [54] which endure in the thymus until E17 [58]. It is tempting to speculate that P2 activity is confined to descendants of the first wave TCP, whereas P1 is active in thymocytes originating in the second wave. Consistent with this hypothesis, the first wave P2neo/neo thymocytes contained a markedly reduced level of Runx1 compared to WT, whereas in second wave thymocytes the level was similar to WT due to switch-on of P1 at E17.5. These second wave thymocytes grow exponentially after birth, when P1 is more active, and become the major cell population in the thymus.

During early stages of thymus development (i.e. E14.4 to E16.5) a marked reduction in thymic cellularity was observed in P2neo/neo embryos. We show that this occurrence was due to enhanced apoptosis of P2neo/neo thymocytes. But why were E14.4 to E16.5 P2neo/neo thymocytes more susceptible to apoptosis than WT cells?

Selection processes in the thymus ensure that peripheral T cells are responsive to foreign antigens but tolerant to self-antigens. This occurs through positive and negative β-selections. Thymocytes, whose TCR engaged peptide/MHC molecules productively, escape their inherent programmed cell death and subsequently are induced to proliferate. On the other hand, thymocytes that react strongly with self-peptide-MHC molecules are actively eliminated [5961]. According to the avidity model, selection occurs only when signals received through the TCR fall between two thresholds: signals below the one are incompatible with survival (death by neglect), while signals above the other result in deletion [47, 62, 63]. We hypothesize that the elevated TCR levels in P2neo/neo thymocytes disturbed this delicate balance and disposed a larger proportion of P2neo/neo T cells to apoptosis.

Several studies in transfected cells have demonstrated the involvement of Runx1 in transcription regulation of TCRs expression [8]. Specifically, we have shown that Runx1 can act as a transcriptional repressor in TCR regulation [4]. Thus, it is conceivable that the increased levels of TCRs in embryonic P2neo/neo thymocytes resulted from the reduced Runx1 expression in these cells, and that the higher TCRs levels lead to a higher avidity of TCR-MHC interactions, which programmed the cells to apoptosis. This hypothesis is supported by Runx1F/F/Lck-Cre mice, which show enhanced negative selection of Runx1-/- thymocyte [13], and by the finding that upon recovery of Runx1 expression in P2neo/neo thymocytes, TCR expression and apoptosis resumed WT levels. Potentially related, mice homozygous for a knock-in Runx1 cDNA that are lacking the C-terminal VWRPY, exhibit thymic hypocellularity [28]. The VWRPY motif, which is highly conserved among all RUNX proteins, is essential for recruitment of the transcriptional co-repressor Gro/TLE [4, 7, 64] and subsequent repression of target genes [4, 7]. Thymic hypocellularity was also noted in mice bearing a hypomorphic allele of Cbfβ, the non-DNA binding partner of Runx1, which is essential for the function of RUNX proteins [49].

In addition to the marked hypocellularity, thymi of P2neo/neo embryos contained an increased proportion of DN3 (CD25+/CD44-) thymocytes, a reduced proportion of DP CD4+/CD8+ thymocytes and a pronounced increase in an abnormal population of immature CD4+/CD8low cells. The increase in DN3 and CD4+/CD8low thymocyte populations was previously observed in adult Runx1F/F/Lck-Cre mice due to diminished Runx1 in DN thymocytes and the consequent derepression of CD4 [13]. More recently a similar increase in CD4+/CD8low thymocytes was also observed in fetuses of Cbfβrss/- mice bearing the hypomorphic Cbfβ allele [49], indicating that Cbfβ is required for CD4 silencing by Runx1. Abnormally high proportion of CD4+ thymocytes was also noted in embryos of the Runx1 knock-in mutant lacking the VWRPY motif [28]. This finding suggests that Runx1-mediated repression of CD4 in DN thymocytes involves the recruitment of Gro/TLE, as in case of Runx3-mediated silencing of CD4 in DP thymocytes [7].

Attenuation of P2 activity affects development of FL HPC

Runx1 is essential for the emergence of embryonal HSC [1618]. Analysis of FL hematopoiesis in P2neo/neo embryos revealed that the emergence and commitment of HPC to either myeloid or lymphoid lineages was not affected by attenuation of P2. However, the noted delay in differentiation and expansion of various P2neo/neo progenitor populations indicated that development of FL HPC was sensitive to diminution in P2 activity. Interestingly, the overall phenotype of FL HPC in P2neo/neo embryos resembled the phenotype observed by Cai et al [18] in heterozygous Runx1+/- fetuses, suggesting a gene dosage effect. In developing FL activity of P1 emerged early and persisted throughout gestation [50]. As P1 activity was largely unaffected in P2neo/neo HPC, it is conceivable that the hypomorphic expression in P2neo/neo FL creates conditions resembling haploinsufficiency [18], in line with the large body of literature documenting hematopoietic defects due to hemizygous dosage of Runx1 [2, 17, 20, 65]. However, it is worth noting that the effect of P2neo/neo hypomorph is not merely through gene dosage, because contrary to Runx1+/- the P2neo/neo neonates die within a few days after birth.

Rescue of the early lethality of P2neo/neoneonates

Despite the diminished P2-activity and reduced Runx1 dosage, P2neo/neo embryos developed to term. Thus the residual P2 activity plus the apparent WT expression of P1 were sufficient to support normal development of P2neo/neo embryos through gestation. However, inactivation in P2neo/neo embryos of one P1 allele, as in the compound mutant Runx1lz;Runx1P2neo, which further reduced Runx1 dosage, caused hemorrhages in the nervous system and mid-gestation (E11.5–E12.5) lethality. This result defined the threshold level requirement of Runx1 for rescue of the nervous system hemorrhages. While P2neo/neo embryos developed to term, neonates die within a few days after birth. Specific removal of the floxed P2-neo cassette by crossing P2neo/+ mice with Lck-Cre transgenics resumed P2 expression in early thymopoiesis, allowed for normal thymic development and rescued the neonatal lethality. Of note, the neonatal lethality was rescued even though expression of P2 in the gastrointestinal tract of P2neo/neo/Lck-Cre mice was not resumed. This occurrence indicated that lethality of P2neo/neo neonates was not due to lack of Runx1 expression in gastrointestinal tract epithelium, despite the striking reduction of nutrients in the gastrointestinal tract of P2neo/neo neonates (see Additional File 2C and 2E). As athymic nude mice live through adulthood, it is conceivable that impaired thymopoiesis in P2neo/neo embryos, especially at the negative selection step, resulted in emergence of pathogenic T cells that cause the neonatal lethality. Finally, as the N-terminus of Runx1 proteins encoded by P2-mRNA differs from that of P1 [3], it is tempting to speculate that the hematopoietic phenotypes of P2neo/neo embryos were caused not only by gene dosage, but are due to the lack of P2 isoforms. Elucidating the specific role of the P1- and P2-protein isoforms in Runx1 biology, particularly early thymopoiesis, awaits further investigations.

Conclusion

Differential usage of alternative promoters enables diversification of transcriptional regulation within a single locus and thereby plays a significant role in the control of gene expression. During mouse embryogenesis the spatio/temporal expression of Runx1 is developmentally regulated by alternative usage of two mutually distinct promoters, P1 and P2. These promoters are not only differentially regulated, but also give rise to mRNAs with variant 5'-UTRs and to structurally different protein isoforms. Our studies support a model whereby attenuation of P2 affects mRNA levels and protein isoforms repertoire within the cell and thereby creates the hematopoietic phenotype of P2neo/neo embryos. The findings provide in vivo evidence for the non-redundant function of P1 and P2 and underscore the significance of alternative promoter usage in Runx1 biology.

Methods

Generation of Runx1 P2neo/neomice

Runx1 genomic clone was isolated from 129/Sv-derived ES cells DNA and a 7.2 Kb EcoRI-PstI fragment spanning 3 Kb upstream of P2, exon 2 and 2.4 Kb of intron 2 [57] was subcloned into pBluescript. A 2 Kb pgk-neo cassette was inserted into the XbaI site at nucleotide 27675861 of the mouse genome (accession # NT-039625). R1 ES cells were transfected with the targeting construct and homologous recombinants were evaluated by Southern blot analysis. Targeted ES cells were used to create several chimeras that passed the mutated Runx1 allele to their progeny. Two independent P2neo/neo mouse lines from two different ES clones were established and bred onto ICR and MF1 strains. As identical phenotypes were observed with mutant mice generated from either of the two-targeted ES cell lines, and with mutant mice bred on either ICR or MF1 background, in most cases we have combined the data. Genotypes were examined by PCR using genomic tail DNA and when applicable verified by Southern analysis. The noon of vaginal plug was considered E0.5. To remove the neo cassette, homozygotes P2neo/neo mice were crossed onto the transgenic Cre-deleter mouse strain PGK-Cre [40] generating mice lacking the neo cassette. Cre-mediated excision of neo was confirmed by PCR. Mice were bred and maintained in a pathogen-free facility. All experiments involving mice were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Weizmann Institute.

Isolation of hematopoietic cells

Thymic lobes and livers of embryos or newborns were aseptically removed, and a single-cell suspension was generated. When required, red blood cells were lyzed with 1:9 volumes of PBS:RCLB (0.9% NH4Cl, 0.1% KHCO3, 0.0037% EDTA, pH7.2).

Protein and RNA analysis

Tissues were collected, washed once in PBS, and proteins or RNA were extracted. Protein extracts were subjected to Western blot analysis as described previously [30, 35]. Poly(A)+ RNA was purified from 150 mg of total RNA using oligo(DT) magnetic beads (Dynal. Oslo, Norway) and subjected to Northern blot analysis as previously described [30, 31]. WT thymocytes expressed four alternatively spliced isoforms of Runx1 transcripts, of which the 2 Kb- and 6 Kb result from P1-mediated transcription, while the 4 Kb- and 8 Kb from P2 activity [31].

RNA preparation and RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA isolated using Tri-Reagent™ (MRC) was reverse transcribed using SuperScript™ II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and resulting cDNA was subjected to PCR reactions using the SuperTherm polymerase (Hoffman-La-Roche). To amplify Runx1 specific sequences, we used a common antisense primer that hybridizes to a sequence in the Runt domain exon 4 with two different sense primers that were complementary to either P1- or P2 5'UTR. Thereby the expression of both P1 and P2 regions were simultaneously monitored, providing a reliable readout of their relative expression levels. The sequences of primers and conditions used for PCR analysis of Runx1 and TCR are as follows: Primers for Runx1 amplification: 5'-GAAACGATGGCTTCAGACAGC-3' (P1-sense), 5'-CTTGGGTGTGAGGCCGATCC-3' (P2-sense), and 5'-ATGACGGTGACCAGAGTGCC-3' (runt domain antisense). β-actin was used as an internal reference, with primers: 5'-GATGACGATATCGCTGCGCTG-3' (sense) and 5'-GTACGACCAGAGGCATACAGG-3' (antisense). The PCR conditions used were as follow: 94°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 57°C for 45 s and 72°C for 45 s. Primers for TCRs amplification: 5'-TCCTCCCCCAACAGGTAGCT-3' (Pre TCRα-sence), 5'-GGCAAACCACCAGCATGTG-3' (Pre TCRα-antisence), 5'-TCTCATAGAGGATGGTGGTGGCAGACA-3' (constant TCRb-sence), 5'-CTGCTACCTTCTGGCACAATCC-3' (constant TCRβ-antisence), 5'-AGGCTTGATGCAGACATTTCCCCC-3' (constant TCRγ-sence) and 5'-CTTGCCAGCAAGTTGTAGGCTTGG-3' (constant TCRγ-antisence). The PCR conditions were as follow: 94°C for 3 min, followed by increasing number of cycles (25, 30, 35) of 94°C for 45 s, annealing for 45 s and 72°C for 60 s. Annealing temperatures were the following: 56°C-TCRα, 55°C-TCRβ and 59°C-TCRγ. All PCR products were analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.

In-Situ hybridization

In situ hybridization with Digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled antisense and sense Riboprobes made of the P2-5'UTR, spanning nucleotide No. 27,373,200-27,374,550 in Genbank Accession # Mm16_39665_36 (see S1A), was performed according to published procedures [66], using 14 μ frozen sections. DIG labeled Riboprobes were detected by anti-DIG antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Roche), and developed with nitro blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indole-phosphate.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Histology and immunohistochemistry were performed as previously described [9, 10]. Polyclonal anti Runx1 antibodies (1:1000) [9, 35], and anti Ki-67 antibodies (1:50) (DakoCytomaion), were incubated overnight at room temperature in blocking solution of PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and 3% heat inactivated normal goat serum for anti Runx1, or normal rabbit serum for anti Ki-67 [67]. Bound antibody was detected using biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies for Runx1, and goat anti-rat IgG for Ki-67. The ABC complex from Vectastain kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was used for peroxidase detection. Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin.

Flow cytometric analysis

Flow cytometry was performed as previously described [14, 68], using the following mAbs from Pharmingen (San Diego, CA): CD4-FITC, CD8-PE, CD44-FITC, CD25-PE, TCRβ-FITC, TCRβ-biotinylated, TCRγδ-PE, c-KIT-PE, CD19-FITC, B220-biotinylated, Gr-1-FITC, CD18-PE, CD11a(LFA-1)-FITC, CD11b(Mac-1)-PE, CD34-FITC, streptavidin-APC.

Proliferation assay and apoptosis analysis

Proliferation assay was conducted as before [14]. 103 FACS sorted Annexin V negative cells were assayed for proliferation using [3H]thymidine (specific activity 25 Ci/mmole). Apoptosis was monitored by double staining with Annexin V and PI. Annexin V-FITC-conjugated anticoagulant (Annexin-V-Fluos Roche, Mannhein, Germany) was used according to manufacturer's instructions. In situ apoptotic cells were detected by staining paraffin sections of thymic lobes with ApopTag Apoptosis Detection System (Biotech). Activated caspase-3, a key apoptotic marker, was detected by IHC of paraffin sections with polyclonal antibodies against activated caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology).

Fetal thymic Organ Culture (FTOC)

Isolation of WT E14.5 thymic lobes, treatment with 1.35 mM 2'-deoxyguanosine (2-dG) (Sigma, St Louis, MO) and incubation of lobes with WT or P2neo/neo FL HPC by means of the hanging drop procedure, were performed as previously described [69]. After 16 days in organ culture, the lobes were removed, rinsed in medium and analyzed for newly populated thymocytes. Limiting dilution assay was performed as described by Jenkinson et al [52] and Dougai et al [51, 54]. The frequency of TCPs per thymic lobe was deduced based on the Poisson probability distribution as previously described [51, 54].

Colony forming unit (CFU) assay

105 FL cells were cultured in 1 ml of single layer DMEM culture medium containing 0.33% agar and 20% horse serum supplemented with 50 ng/ml stem cell factor, 20 ng/ml IL-3, 25 ng/ml IL-6, 5 ng/ml GM-CSF, and 2 ng/ml G-CSF to provide optimal conditions for multiplication and differentiation of multipotential hematopoietic progenitors of definitive hematopoiesis [19]. The number of colonies was determined after 7 days of incubation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Judith Chermesh, Rafi Saka and Shoshana Grossfeled for help in animal housbandry and Dorit Nathan, Tamara Berkuzki, and Eti Yael for technical assistance and Ayala Sharp and Eitan Ariel for help in FACS analysis. The work was supported by grants from the Commission of the EU (AnEUploidy), the Israel Science Foundation, and Shapell Family Biomedical Research Foundation at the Weizmann Institute.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Genetics, The Weizmann Institute of Science
(2)
Department of Veterinary Resources, The Weizmann Institute of Science
(3)
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine
(4)
Department of Medical Genetics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University

References

  1. Cameron ER, Neil JC: The Runx genes: lineage-specific oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Oncogene. 2004, 23 (24): 4308-4314. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. de Bruijn MF, Speck NA: Core-binding factors in hematopoiesis and immune function. Oncogene. 2004, 23 (24): 4238-4248. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207763.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Levanon D, Groner Y: Structure and regulated expression of mammalian RUNX genes. Oncogene. 2004, 23 (24): 4211-4219. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207670.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Levanon D, Goldstein RE, Bernstein Y, Tang H, Goldenberg D, Stifani S, Paroush Z, Groner Y: Transcriptional repression by AML1 and LEF-1 is mediated by the TLE/Groucho corepressors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95 (20): 11590-11595. 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11590.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Durst KL, Hiebert SW: Role of RUNX family members in transcriptional repression and gene silencing. Oncogene. 2004, 23 (24): 4220-4224. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207122.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gasperowicz M, Otto F: Mammalian Groucho homologs: redundancy or specificity?. J Cell Biochem. 2005, 95 (4): 670-687. 10.1002/jcb.20476.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yarmus M, Woolf E, Bernstein Y, Fainaru O, Negreanu V, Levanon D, Groner Y: Groucho/transducin-like Enhancer-of-split (TLE)-dependent and -independent transcriptional regulation by Runx3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103 (19): 7384-7389. 10.1073/pnas.0602470103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Otto F, Lubbert M, Stock M: Upstream and downstream targets of RUNX proteins. J Cell Biochem. 2003, 89 (1): 9-18. 10.1002/jcb.10491.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Levanon D, Brenner O, Negreanu V, Bettoun D, Woolf E, Eilam R, Lotem J, Gat U, Otto F, Speck N, Groner Y: Spatial and temporal expression pattern of Runx3 (Aml2) and Runx1 (Aml1) indicates non-redundant functions during mouse embryogenesis. Mech Dev. 2001, 109 (2): 413-417. 10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00537-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Levanon D, Bettoun D, Harris-Cerruti C, Woolf E, Negreanu V, Eilam R, Bernstein Y, Goldenberg D, Xiao C, Fliegauf M, Kremer E, Otto F, Brenner O, Lev-Tov A, Groner Y: The Runx3 transcription factor regulates development and survival of TrkC dorsal root ganglia neurons. Embo J. 2002, 21 (13): 3454-3463. 10.1093/emboj/cdf370.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen CL, Broom DC, Liu Y, de Nooij JC, Li Z, Cen C, Samad OA, Jessell TM, Woolf CJ, Ma Q: Runx1 determines nociceptive sensory neuron phenotype and is required for thermal and neuropathic pain. Neuron. 2006, 49 (3): 365-377. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kramer I, Sigrist M, de Nooij JC, Taniuchi I, Jessell TM, Arber S: A role for Runx transcription factor signaling in dorsal root ganglion sensory neuron diversification. Neuron. 2006, 49 (3): 379-393. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Taniuchi I, Osato M, Egawa T, Sunshine MJ, Bae SC, Komori T, Ito Y, Littman DR: Differential requirements for Runx proteins in CD4 repression and epigenetic silencing during T lymphocyte development. Cell. 2002, 111 (5): 621-633. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01111-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Woolf E, Xiao C, Fainaru O, Lotem J, Rosen D, Negreanu V, Bernstein Y, Goldenberg D, Brenner O, Berke G, Levanon D, Groner Y: Runx3 and Runx1 are required for CD8 T cell development during thymopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100 (13): 7731-7736. 10.1073/pnas.1232420100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Djuretic IM, Levanon D, Negreanu V, Groner Y, Rao A, Ansel KM: Transcription factors T-bet and Runx3 cooperate to activate Ifng and silence Il4 in T helper type 1 cells. Nat Immunol. 2007, 8 (2): 145-153. 10.1038/ni1424.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. North T, Gu TL, Stacy T, Wang Q, Howard L, Binder M, Marin-Padilla M, Speck NA: Cbfa2 is required for the formation of intra-aortic hematopoietic clusters. Development. 1999, 126: 2563-2575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. North TE, de Bruijn MF, Stacy T, Talebian L, Lind E, Robin C, Binder M, Dzierzak E, Speck NA: Runx1 expression marks long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells in the midgestation mouse embryo. Immunity. 2002, 16 (5): 661-672. 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00296-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cai Z, de Bruijn M, Ma X, Dortland B, Luteijn T, Downing RJ, Dzierzak E: Haploinsufficiency of AML1 affects the temporal and spatial generation of hematopoietic stem cells in the mouse embryo. Immunity. 2000, 13 (4): 423-431. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00042-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Okuda T, van Deursen J, Hiebert SW, Grosveld G, Downing JR: AML1, the target of multiple chromosomal translocations in human leukemia, is essential for normal fetal liver hematopoiesis. Cell. 1996, 84 (2): 321-330. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80986-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang Q, Stacy T, Binder M, Marin-Padilla M, Sharpe AH, Speck NA: Disruption of the Cbfa2 gene causes necrosis and hemorrhaging in the central nervous system and blocks definitive hematopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93 (8): 3444-3449. 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3444.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lorsbach RB, Moore J, Ang SO, Sun W, Lenny N, Downing JR: Role of RUNX1 in adult hematopoiesis: analysis of RUNX1-IRES-GFP knock-in mice reveals differential lineage expression. Blood. 2004, 103 (7): 2522-2529. 10.1182/blood-2003-07-2439.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. North TE, Stacy T, Matheny CJ, Speck NA, de Bruijn MF: Runx1 is expressed in adult mouse hematopoietic stem cells and differentiating myeloid and lymphoid cells, but not in maturing erythroid cells. Stem Cells. 2004, 22 (2): 158-168. 10.1634/stemcells.22-2-158.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ichikawa M, Asai T, Saito T, Seo S, Yamazaki I, Yamagata T, Mitani K, Chiba S, Ogawa S, Kurokawa M, Hirai H: AML-1 is required for megakaryocytic maturation and lymphocytic differentiation, but not for maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells in adult hematopoiesis. Nat Med. 2004, 10 (3): 299-304. 10.1038/nm997.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Growney JD, Shigematsu H, Li Z, Lee BH, Adelsperger J, Rowan R, Curley DP, Kutok JL, Akashi K, Williams IR, Speck NA, Gilliland DG: Loss of Runx1 perturbs adult hematopoiesis and is associated with a myeloproliferative phenotype. Blood. 2005, 106 (2): 494-504. 10.1182/blood-2004-08-3280.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayashi K, Natsume W, Watanabe T, Abe N, Iwai N, Okada H, Ito Y, Asano M, Iwakura Y, Habu S, Takahama Y, Satake M: Diminution of the AML1 transcription factor function causes differential effects on the fates of CD4 and CD8 single-positive T cells. J Immunol. 2000, 165 (12): 6816-6824.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Komine O, Hayashi K, Natsume W, Watanabe T, Seki Y, Seki N, Yagi R, Sukzuki W, Tamauchi H, Hozumi K, Habu S, Kubo M, Satake M: The Runx1 transcription factor inhibits the differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into the Th2 lineage by repressing GATA3 expression. J Exp Med. 2003, 198 (1): 51-61. 10.1084/jem.20021200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sato T, Ohno S, Hayashi T, Sato C, Kohu K, Satake M, Habu S: Dual functions of Runx proteins for reactivating CD8 and silencing CD4 at the commitment process into CD8 thymocytes. Immunity. 2005, 22 (3): 317-328. 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.01.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nishimura M, Fukushima-Nakase Y, Fujita Y, Nakao M, Toda S, Kitamura N, Abe T, Okuda T: VWRPY motif-dependent and -independent roles of AML1/Runx1 transcription factor in murine hematopoietic development. Blood. 2004, 103 (2): 562-570. 10.1182/blood-2003-06-2109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ghozi MC, Bernstein Y, Negreanu V, Levanon D, Groner Y: Expression of the human acute myeloid leukemia gene AML1 is regulated by two promoter regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93 (5): 1935-1940. 10.1073/pnas.93.5.1935.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pozner A, Goldenberg D, Negreanu V, Le SY, Elroy-Stein O, Levanon D, Groner Y: Transcription-coupled translation control of AML1/RUNX1 is mediated by cap- and internal ribosome entry site-dependent mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20 (7): 2297-2307. 10.1128/MCB.20.7.2297-2307.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Levanon D, Bernstein Y, Negreanu V, Ghozi MC, Bar-Am I, Aloya R, Goldenberg D, Lotem J, Groner Y: A large variety of alternatively spliced and differentially expressed mRNAs are encoded by the human acute myeloid leukemia gene AML1. DNA Cell Biol. 1996, 15 (3): 175-185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Telfer JC, Rothenberg EV: Expression and function of a stem cell promoter for the murine CBFalpha2 gene: distinct roles and regulation in natural killer and T cell development. Dev Biol. 2001, 229 (2): 363-382. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9991.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Telfer JC, Hedblom EE, Anderson MK, Laurent MN, Rothenberg EV: Localization of the domains in Runx transcription factors required for the repression of CD4 in thymocytes. J Immunol. 2004, 172 (7): 4359-4370.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu H, Carlsson L, Grundstrom T: Identification of an N-terminal transactivation domain of Runx1 that separates molecular function from global differentiation function. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (35): 25659-25669. 10.1074/jbc.M603249200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Aziz-Aloya RB, Levanon D, Karn H, Kidron D, Goldenberg D, Lotem J, Polak-Chaklon S, Groner Y: Expression of AML1-d, a short human AML1 isoform, in embryonic stem cells suppresses in vivo tumor growth and differentiation. Cell Death Differ. 1998, 5 (9): 765-773. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tanaka T, Tanaka K, Ogawa S, Korokawa M, Mitani K, Nishida J, Shibata Y, Yazaki Y, Hirai H: An acute myeloid leukemia gene, AML1, regulates hemopoietic myeloid cell differentiation and transcriptional activation antagonistically by two alternative spliced forms. EMBO J. 1995, 14 (2): 341-350.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Bae SC, Ogawa E, Maruyama M, Oka H, Satake M, Shigesada K, Jenkins NA, Gilbert DJ, Copeland NG, Ito Y: PEBP2 alpha B/mouse AML1 consists of multiple isoforms that possess differential transactivation potentials. Mol Cell Biol. 1994, 14 (5): 3242-3252.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pui CH, Campana D, Evans WE: Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia--current status and future perspectives. Lancet Oncol. 2001, 2 (10): 597-607. 10.1016/S1470-2045(01)00516-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. van der Velden AW, Thomas AA: The role of the 5' untranslated region of an mRNA in translation regulation during development. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1999, 31 (1): 87-106. 10.1016/S1357-2725(98)00134-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lallemand Y, Luria V, Haffner-Krausz R, Lonai P: Maternally expressed PGK-Cre transgene as a tool for early and uniform activation of the Cre site-specific recombinase. Transgenic Res. 1998, 7 (2): 105-112. 10.1023/A:1008868325009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lakso M, Pichel JG, Gorman JR, Sauer B, Okamoto Y, Lee E, Alt FW, Westphal H: Efficient in vivo manipulation of mouse genomic sequences at the zygote stage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93 (12): 5860-5865. 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5860.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Manley NR: Thymus organogenesis and molecular mechanisms of thymic epithelial cell differentiation. Semin Immunol. 2000, 12 (5): 421-428. 10.1006/smim.2000.0263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Garcia-Suarez O, Germana A, Hannestad J, Ciriaco E, Laura R, Naves J, Esteban I, Silos-Santiago I, Vega JA: TrkA is necessary for the normal development of the murine thymus. J Neuroimmunol. 2000, 108 (1-2): 11-21. 10.1016/S0165-5728(00)00251-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Fleck M, Zhou T, Tatsuta T, Yang P, Wang Z, Mountz JD: Fas/Fas ligand signaling during gestational T cell development. J Immunol. 1998, 160 (8): 3766-3775.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Allen PM: Peptides in positive and negative selection: a delicate balance. Cell. 1994, 76 (4): 593-596. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90497-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hogquist KA, Jameson SC, Heath WR, Howard JL, Bevan MJ, Carbone FR: T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell. 1994, 76 (1): 17-27. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90169-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Jameson SC, Hogquist KA, Bevan MJ: Specificity and flexibility in thymic selection. Nature. 1994, 369 (6483): 750-752. 10.1038/369750a0.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Burtrum DB, Kim S, Dudley EC, Hayday AC, Petrie HT: TCR gene recombination and alpha beta-gamma delta lineage divergence: productive TCR-beta rearrangement is neither exclusive nor preclusive of gamma delta cell development. J Immunol. 1996, 157 (10): 4293-4296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Talebian L, Li Z, Guo Y, Gaudet J, Speck ME, Sugiyama D, Kaur P, Pear WS, Maillard I, Speck NA: T lymphoid, megakaryocyte, and granulocyte development are sensitive to decreases in CBF{beta} dosage. Blood. 2006Google Scholar
  50. Pozner A: Promoter specific targeting of Runx1 reveals new insights into Runx1 biology. The Weizmann Institute of Science, Molecular Genetics Department 2003. 2003Google Scholar
  51. Douagi I, Colucci F, Di Santo JP, Cumano A: Identification of the earliest prethymic bipotent T/NK progenitor in murine fetal liver. Blood. 2002, 99 (2): 463-471. 10.1182/blood.V99.2.463.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Jenkinson EJ, Franchi LL, Kingston R, Owen JJ: Effect of deoxyguanosine on lymphopoiesis in the developing thymus rudiment in vitro: application in the production of chimeric thymus rudiments. Eur J Immunol. 1982, 12 (7): 583-587. 10.1002/eji.1830120710.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ema H, Douagi I, Cumano A, Kourilsky P: Development of T cell precursor activity in the murine fetal liver. Eur J Immunol. 1998, 28 (5): 1563-1569. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199805)28:05<1563::AID-IMMU1563>3.0.CO;2-R.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Douagi I, Andre I, Ferraz JC, Cumano A: Characterization of T cell precursor activity in the murine fetal thymus: evidence for an input of T cell precursors between days 12 and 14 of gestation. Eur J Immunol. 2000, 30 (8): 2201-2210. 10.1002/1521-4141(2000)30:8<2201::AID-IMMU2201>3.0.CO;2-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Takakura N, Watanabe T, Suenobu S, Yamada Y, Noda T, Ito Y, Satake M, Suda T: A role for hematopoietic stem cells in promoting angiogenesis. Cell. 2000, 102 (2): 199-209. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00025-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Takahama Y, Ohishi K, Tokoro Y, Sugawara T, Yoshimura Y, Okabe M, Kinoshita T, Takeda J: Functional competence of T cells in the absence of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins caused by T cell-specific disruption of the Pig-a gene. Eur J Immunol. 1998, 28 (7): 2159-2166. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199807)28:07<2159::AID-IMMU2159>3.0.CO;2-B.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Levanon D, Glusman G, Bangsow T, Ben-Asher E, Male DA, Avidan N, Bangsow C, Hattori M, Taylor TD, Taudien S, Blechschmidt K, Shimizu N, Rosenthal A, Sakaki Y, Lancet D, Groner Y: Architecture and anatomy of the genomic locus encoding the human leukemia-associated transcription factor RUNX1/AML1. Gene. 2001, 262 (1-2): 23-33. 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00532-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Jotereau F, Heuze F, Salomon-Vie V, Gascan H: Cell kinetics in the fetal mouse thymus: precursor cell input, proliferation, and emigration. J Immunol. 1987, 138 (4): 1026-1030.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Benoist C, Mathis D: Positive selection of the T cell repertoire: where and when does it occur?. Cell. 1989, 58 (6): 1027-1033. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90501-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Sprent J, Kishimoto H: The thymus and negative selection. Immunol Rev. 2002, 185: 126-135. 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2002.18512.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Starr TK, Jameson SC, Hogquist KA: Positive and negative selection of T cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003, 21: 139-176. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Ashton-Rickardt PG, Tonegawa S: A differential-avidity model for T-cell selection. Immunol Today. 1994, 15 (8): 362-366. 10.1016/0167-5699(94)90174-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Jameson SC, Hogquist KA, Bevan MJ: Positive selection of thymocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 1995, 13: 93-126. 10.1146/annurev.iy.13.040195.000521.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Aronson BD, Fisher AL, Blechman K, Caudy M, Gergen JP: Groucho-dependent and-indenpendent repression activities of Runt domain proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1997, 17: 5581-5587.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Mukouyama Y, Chiba N, Hara T, Okada H, Ito Y, Kanamaru R, Miyajima A, Satake M, Watanabe T: The AML1 transcription factor functions to develop and maintain hematogenic precursor cells in the embryonic aorta-gonad-mesonephros region. Dev Biol. 2000, 220 (1): 27-36. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9617.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. McQuaid S, McMahon J, Allan GM: A comparison of digoxigenin and biotin labelled DNA and RNA probes for in situ hybridization. Biotech Histochem. 1995, 70 (3): 147-154.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Kubbutat MH, Key G, Duchrow M, Schluter C, Flad HD, Gerdes J: Epitope analysis of antibodies recognising the cell proliferation associated nuclear antigen previously defined by the antibody Ki-67 (Ki-67 protein). J Clin Pathol. 1994, 47 (6): 524-528. 10.1136/jcp.47.6.524.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Fainaru O, Woolf E, Lotem J, Yarmus M, Brenner O, Goldenberg D, Negreanu V, Bernstein Y, Levanon D, Jung S, Groner Y: Runx3 regulates mouse TGF-beta-mediated dendritic cell function and its absence results in airway inflammation. Embo J. 2004, 23 (4): 969-979. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600085.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Watanabe Y, Gyotoku J, Katsura Y: Analysis of the development of T cells by transferring precursors into cultured fetal thymus with a microinjector. Thymus. 1989, 13 (1-2): 57-71.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pozner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement