- Research article
- Open Access
An additional human chromosome 21 causes suppression of neural fate of pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells in a teratoma model
© Mensah et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 02 May 2007
- Accepted: 29 November 2007
- Published: 29 November 2007
Down syndrome (DS), caused by trisomy of human chromosome 21 (HSA21), is the most common genetic cause of mental retardation in humans. Among complex phenotypes, it displays a number of neural pathologies including smaller brain size, reduced numbers of neurons, reduced dendritic spine density and plasticity, and early Alzheimer-like neurodegeneration. Mouse models for DS show behavioural and cognitive defects, synaptic plasticity defects, and reduced hippocampal and cerebellar neuron numbers. Early postnatal development of both human and mouse-model DS shows the reduced capability of neuronal precursor cells to generate neurons. The exact molecular cause of this reduction, and the role played by increased dosage of individual HSA21 genes, remain unknown.
We have subcutaneously injected mouse pluripotent ES cells containing a single freely segregating supernumerary human chromosome 21 (HSA21) into syngeneic mice, to generate transchromosomic teratomas. Transchromosomic cells and parental control cells were injected into opposite flanks of thirty mice in three independent experiments. Tumours were grown for 30 days, a time-span equivalent to combined intra-uterine, and early post-natal mouse development. When paired teratomas from the same animals were compared, transchromosomic tumours showed a three-fold lower percentage of neuroectodermal tissue, as well as significantly reduced mRNA levels for neuron specific (Tubb3) and glia specific (Gfap) genes, relative to euploid controls. Two thirds of transchromosomic tumours also showed a lack of PCR amplification with multiple primers specific for HSA21, which were present in the ES cells at the point of injection, thus restricting a commonly retained trisomy to less than a third of HSA21 genes.
We demonstrate that a supernumerary chromosome 21 causes Inhibition of Neuroectodermal DIfferentiation (INDI) of pluripotent ES cells. The data suggest that trisomy of less than a third of HSA21 genes, in two chromosomal regions, might be sufficient to cause this effect.
- Embryonic Stem Cell
- Supernumerary Chromosome
- Pluripotent Embryonic Stem Cell
- Undifferentiated Embryonic Stem Cell
- HSA21 Gene
Down's syndrome (DS), caused by the trisomy of human chromosome 21 (HSA21),  is a complex condition characterized by a plethora of phenotypic features, most striking of which are reduced neuron number and synaptic plasticity, early Alzheimer-like neurodegeneration, craniofacial dysmorphia, heart development defects, and powerful suppression of the incidence of most solid tumours [2, 3]. In the first few months of life, DS babies display brachycephaly, microcephaly, delayed myelination, reduced growth of frontal lobes, a narrowing of the superior temporal gyrus, diminished size of the brainstem and cerebellum, and up to 50% reduction in numbers of cortical granular neurons [4–6]. The exact timing of onset of these changes is still unclear. In a limited study, neuronal progenitor cells from 3 foetal DS brains showed a reduced neuron number following further differentiation in vitro, compared to euploid foetal cells . Also, DS foetal neural cells showed a reduced propensity for proliferation and survival in vitro compared to euploid controls . Tumours of neural tissues, such as neuroblastomas, are comparatively very rarely observed in DS individuals [9, 10].
Mouse models for DS display, among other features, behavioural and cognitive defects, synaptic plasticity defects and long term potentiation (LTP) deficits in the hippocampus, as well as reduced hippocampal and cerebellar neuron numbers [11–14]. The reduction of cerebellar granule neuron numbers in mouse models occurs in the first 10 days postnatally, due to a defective response to Sonic hedgehog (Shh) , secreted by an already reduced number of Purkinje neurons . In the hippocampus, the exact timing of the onset of neuronal precursor cell reduction is less clear, but a reduced number of mitotically active granule neuron cell precursors is observed at day P6 . At 4–6 months of age, mice undergo a neurodegenerative reduction of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons [17, 18], further contributing to the reduction in granule cell neuron numbers .
Three quarters of human trisomy 21 concepti die in utero from developmental arrest , and phenotypic features of DS are retained even in mosaic DS subjects , as well as in transchromosomic DS mouse models where adult tissues retain <50% trisomic cells, having started from a fully trisomic conceptus [22, 23]. This implies that many phenotypic features of DS must be determined by events occurring very early in development, but the exact nature of these early events, and the role played by increased dosage of individual HSA21 genes remain unknown. In an attempt to study the effects of trisomy 21 on the capacity of pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells to proliferate and differentiate in vivo, we report here the use of a mouse pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cell line with a freely segregating HSA21 as a single supernumerary chromosome , in the generation of transchromosomic teratomas upon subcutaneous injections into syngeneic mice.
Generation of teratomas
The cell line (47-1), generated by introduction of a single HSA21 into the mouse ES cell line D3, was found by PCR amplification of human specific markers to contain virtually all of the gene content of HSA21, and was shown not to contain DNA from any human chromosome other than HSA21 . Transchromosomic 47-1 and control D3 cell lines were cultured under identical conditions and verified at the point of injection to be undifferentiated, having similar proliferation indices, and showing the presence of HSA21 in practically all 47-1 cells, and absence in D3 cells [see Additional files 1 &2]. Integrity of the retained HSA21 was verified by human specific PCR of 33 markers, and RT-PCR of 8 HSA21 genes. In 3 independent experiments (each starting from a new batch of frozen cells and following the entire experimental design as outlined in [see Additional file 1], a total of 30 mice were injected subcutaneously, each with 47-1 cells into the left flank, and D3 cells into the right flank. The resulting subcutaneous tumours were harvested 30 days later resulting in n = 24 mice - (left flanks, 47-1 injection point) and n = 21 mice (right flanks, D3 injection point). Sixteen animals developed tumours in both flanks. No significant difference in size/weight was found between 47-1 and D3 tumours (see Additional file 3). All tumours grew as solitary (single tumour per injection point) spheroid masses in the sub-cutaneous tissue, clearly separated from host tissues by an envelope of connective-like tissue.
Histological analysis of the teratomas
Qualitative histological analysis of standard H&E stained tumour sections revealed a multitude of different cell types in all tumours. Scattered islands of many tissue types were observed including: keratinized squamous epithelium, ciliated epithelium, glandular epithelium, acini of salivary glands, smooth muscle, cartilage, bone, haematopoietic tissue, fat tissue and undifferentiated tissue. Many tumour slices lacked the presence of differentiated neuroectodermal tissue.
Analysis of a HSA21 region causing Inhibition of Neuroectodermal DIfferentiation (INDI)
The undifferentiated ES cell inoculates were allowed to develop for 30 days, equivalent to the time span of entire intrauterine, and 10 postnatal days of mouse development. This extended period encompasses the critical interval (P0–P6), in which the biggest difference in neuronal precursor cell proliferation was observed between mouse models of DS, and their euploid littermate controls [11, 15, 16]. The use of syngeneic inbred mouse strains also minimizes the individual variation, which is further reduced by the paired analysis of tumours which grow in the same recipient animal. Using this system, we have observed a powerful inhibition of neuroectodermal fate in transchromosomic +HSA21 containing pluripotent mouse ES cells, compared to their parental control (Fig 1A,B.). This conclusion is not without caveats: the inhibition of neural fate could be specific to the cell line used, or it could be related to the sheer presence of a supernumerary chromosome, not specific to HSA21. Though it is impossible to rule out these caveats at this stage, we believe on balance of probabilities, that this system shows a measurable phenotype with potential to map it to a segment of HSA21. The reduced Tubb3 levels (Fig 1C) clearly indicate a reduction in mature neuron numbers in trisomic teratomas, confirmed by neuron specific staining (Fig 2). The reduction in GFAP levels could be partly the result of reduced numbers of mature astrocytes, as well as reduced numbers of neuronal precursors, corresponding to GFAP+ cells found in the subgranular zone and hilus . These GFAP+ precursors divide and give rise to immature neurons (DCX+PSA-NCAM+) . Radial glial cells, which are the main source of precursors for neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus, also express GFAP . These very cellular layers are the site of the biggest deficit in mitotic activity at postnatal day 6 in mouse models of DS .
Spontaneous deletions of the supernumerary HSA21 were observed in two thirds of transchromosomic tumours (Fig 3). As there were sufficient numbers of cells of many different tissue types in all tumours, and multiple HSA21 PCR reactions (including RT-PCR of ubiquitously expressed HSA21 genes) were negative in the deleted regions, deletions must have occurred before any differentiation of ES cells in the tumours took place, probably during the early cell divisions at the very start of tumour growth. Alternatively, a subset of cells with a major deletion might have been present within the inoculum of 47-1 cells; a less likely explanation, as 3 independent cultures gave rise to a similar proportion of tumours with, and without deletions. We cannot exclude the possibility that the inocula in all 3 experiments contained a mixture of two clones, the 47-1, and a segmental trisomy clone. However, the deleted segments also show subtle variations in the pattern of markers present, making this possibility less likely. Whether the deletions are caused by an instable DNA sequence element, and whether or not they provide a selective advantage to the proliferation of cells, remains to be investigated. Regardless of the cause of deletions within the tumours, they had no effect on the statistical significance of any differences shown in Fig. 1. Though the data are not conclusive on this point, it can be hypothesized that the segmental trisomy of two regions common to all tumours (Fig. 4), comprising less than a third of the HSA21 gene complement, could be sufficient to cause a powerful Inhibition of Neuroectodermal DIfferentiation (INDI) in pluripotent ES cells in vivo.
The telomeric INDI region partially overlaps with trisomic regions in mouse segmental trisomy models for DS, such as Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje (Fig. 4), which both have a reduced number of granular layer neurons in the cerebellum and hippocampus, compared to euploid littermates [11, 16, 27]. The overlap between the telomeric INDI segment and the 3 mouse models shown in Fig. 4. is restricted to 23 genes (based on comparisons, see refs [1, 28]. The centromeric INDI region is less likely to play a causative role in INDI, as the degree of cerebellar neuron number reduction is similar between the Tc1 mouse model  which has this region in trisomy, and the Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje models that do not . The exception are only 3 genes from the centromeric INDI region (BTG3, YG81 and PRSS7) which are deleted in the third chromosome of the Tc1 model , and therefore remain unchecked. The telomeric INDI segment of 23 genes overlapping with trisomic mouse models is fully contained within the Ts1Rhr, the 33 gene-trisomy mouse model, which does not show the reduction in cerebellar volume, or neuron density . This mouse model also shows no hippocampal volume change, and no electrophysiological and behavioural defects associated with hippocampal functions, therefore suggesting that trisomy of this segment is not sufficient to cause the brain pathology in the mouse . However, this 33 gene segment was found necessary for most of the cerebellar and hippocampal pathology of Ts65Dn model, as when its trisomy is reversed to disomy, the pathologies disappeared . This segment also probably contains highly and bi-directionally dose sensitive genes regulating brain development, as a monosomy of this segment (mouse model Ms1RhR) produces striking changes in cerebellar and hippocampal volume and neuron density . The data in our system could differ from those in the Ts1RhR model due to the human, rather than mouse, origin of the third chromosome. Interestingly, very recent data in human DS show that duplication of a 4.3 Mb segment, completely contained within the 33 gene equivalent segment in the mouse, is sufficient to cause (in three members of the same family) a range of DS phenotypes, including brachycephaly, intellectual disability, mental retardation, speech learning impairment, and a typical facial gestalt of DS . Our data suggest that further studies of individual gene dosage effects within the INDI region could reveal major candidate contributors to DS-related hypo-cellularity of the CNS, and suppression of neuroblastomas.
We demonstrate that a supernumerary chromosome 21 causes Inhibition of Neuroectodermal DIfferentiation (INDI) of pluripotent ES cells. The data open themselves to interpretation that the trisomy of less than a third of HSA21 genes, in two chromosomal regions, could be sufficient to cause this effect.
General outline of the experimental design is summarized [see Additional file 1].
ES cell lines and culture
The transchromosomic cell line 47-1, described in a previous publication , has been produced by tagging HSA21 with a Neomycin resistance marker, and introducing the tagged chromosome into a mouse embryonic stem cell line D3, using microcell mediated chromosome transfer. ES cells were grown on a layer of mitotically inactivated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (feeder cells), in medium supplemented with LIF (ESGRO). ES medium: DMEM, 15% FCS, 25,000 U Pen/Strep, L-Glutamine, non-essential amino acids, β-mercaptoethanol, 5 × 105 U/ml LIF. 47-1 ES cells were also grown in the presence of G418 (500 mg/ml), until one passage before they were harvested for injections. During this last passage the G418 was removed, so that the 47-1 and D3 cells had identical culturing conditions. At the point of injection, aliquots of both cell suspensions have been verified by phase contrast microscopy to contain morphologically undifferentiated cells, with similar proliferation indices, as measured by visualizing the cells in mitosis using a Phosphohistone H3-specific antibody [see Additional file 2]. One aliquot each of the 47-1 and D3 ES cells was cultured without feeders for one passage, and interphase nuclei were prepared for FISH using a HSA21-specific centromeric probe pZ21A, and standard protocol for interphase nuclei FISH . HSA21 retention was confirmed in 96/100 examined 47-1 cells, and 0/100 D3 [see Additional file 2].
Injections and tumour utilization
The use of mice was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and by the Home Office project licence (PPL 70/5714). ES cells were trypsinised, washed twice in sterile 1× PBS and resuspended at a density of 6.5 × 106 cells/200 μl (experiment 1), or 5 × 106 cells/200 μl (experiments 2 and 3) immediately before injections. Equal numbers of cells in 200 μl of D3 and 47-1 ES cell suspensions were subcutaneously injected into the right and left flanks respectively of each of a total of 30 male 129/Sv mice. Mice were monitored every two days for tumour growth (assessed by palpation and measurement with callipers). At 30 days post-injection, mice were sacrificed and tumours removed. Each tumour was cut in half. One half was placed in 10% buffered formalin and the other half snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Snap-frozen tumour halves were ground into powder before extracting total RNA and DNA. RNA extraction was carried out using RNABee (Biogenesis) in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. DNA was extracted using 5% Chelex (Sigma) suspension.
Paraffin-embedded blocks of each tumour were cut in 3 μm thick sections and stained with H&E using standard protocols. Sections were analysed by a histopathologist blinded to the origin of the tumours, for the relative abundance of four types of tissue: neuroectodermal, mesenchymal, epithelial and undifferentiated, expressed as the percentage of the total tumour slice, as demonstrated with an example for a pair of tumours in Fig. 1A.
Cytospins of D3 and 47-1 ES cell suspensions remaining from injections in experiment 1 were fixed with 2% PFA and stained with antibody specific for Phospho-Histone H3 (1:1000) to determine ES cell viability at the point of injection. Alexa Fluor 594 (Molecular probes) was used a secondary antibody (1:800). Paraffin sections of tumours were stained with anti-GFAP rabbit polyclonal (DAKO,1:1000) and anti-MAP-2 monoclonal (Chemicon,1:500) antibodies, and visualised with Alexa Fluors 488 and 594 respectively (Molecular probes, 1:800). Immunofluorescently stained cells and tumour sections were viewed using a Zeiss Axioskop and the Quips Smartcapture Imaging Software (Vysis).
Quantitative RT-PCR for tissue specific markers
Expression levels of mouse Tubb3 and mouse Gfap mRNAs were assessed by real-time PCR in an ABI 7700 system, using SYBR Green as the reporter dye and mouse Gapdh as the endogenous normalizing control. Primers for real-time PCR were designed using Primer Express software (ABI). Tubb3 primers: 300 nM FWD/300 nM REV (GCTGTCCGCCTGCCTTTT/GACCTCCCAGAACTTGGCC). Gfap primers: 900 nM FWD/300 nM REV (GAAAACCGCATCACCATTCC/TCGGATCTGGAGGTTGGAGA). Gapdh primers: 300 nM FWD/50 nM REV (CCAGAAGACTGTGGATGGC/TGAGCTTCCCGTTCAGCTC). Normalized mRNA levels were calculated using the standard curve method.
Assessment of integrity of HSA21 in the transchromosomic tumours
For mapping of the HSA21 retention in 47-1 tumours, STS primer sequences were obtained from the UniSTS database . The ubiquitous expression of HSA21 cDNA markers was determined from assessment of the Unigene database , and data from expression catalogue studies of HSA21 genes [33, 34]. DNA and cDNA primers were designed to be human specific in at least two of the most 3' bases. The exact sequences and conditions for each primer set are available on request.
The use of mice was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and by the Home Office project licence (PPL 70/5714). We thank Zoe Coade and Tony Price for help with mouse handling. Project was supported by the Barts & The London Charitable Foundation (grant RAB03/PJ/6), by the Leukaemia Research Fund UK Specialist Programme grant (LRF 06003), the Fondation Jerome Lejeune, and by the "AnEUploidy" integrated project from Framework Programme 6 from the EU Commission.
- Antonarakis SE, Lyle R, Dermitzakis ET, Reymond A, Deutsch S: Chromosome 21 and down syndrome: from genomics to pathophysiology. Nat Rev Genet. 2004, 5: 725-738. 10.1038/nrg1448.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Epstein C: Down Syndrome. The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease. Edited by: Scriver CR BALSWSVD. 2001, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1223-1256.Google Scholar
- Yang Q, Rasmussen SA, Friedman JM: Mortality associated with Down's syndrome in the USA from 1983 to 1997: a population-based study. Lancet. 2002, 359: 1019-1025. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08092-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jernigan TL, Bellugi U, Sowell E, Doherty S, Hesselink JR: Cerebral morphologic distinctions between Williams and Down syndromes. Arch Neurol. 1993, 50: 186-191.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nadel L: Down syndrome in neurobiological perspective. Neurodevelopmental disorders. Edited by: Tager-Flusberg H. 1999, Cambridge MA, MIT Press, 197-221.Google Scholar
- Pinter JD, Eliez S, Schmitt JE, Capone GT, Reiss AL: Neuroanatomy of Down's syndrome: a high-resolution MRI study. Am J Psychiatry. 2001, 158: 1659-1665. 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.10.1659.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bahn S, Mimmack M, Ryan M, Caldwell MA, Jauniaux E, Starkey M, Svendsen CN, Emson P: Neuronal target genes of the neuron-restrictive silencer factor in neurospheres derived from fetuses with Down's syndrome: a gene expression study. Lancet. 2002, 359: 310-315. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07497-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Busciglio J, Yankner BA: Apoptosis and increased generation of reactive oxygen species in Down's syndrome neurons in vitro. Nature. 1995, 378: 776-779. 10.1038/378776a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Satge D, Sasco AJ, Carlsen NL, Stiller CA, Rubie H, Hero B, de Bernardi B, de Kraker J, Coze C, Kogner P, Langmark F, Hakvoort-Cammel FG, Beck D, von der Weid N, Parkes S, Hartmann O, Lippens RJ, Kamps WA, Sommelet D: A lack of neuroblastoma in Down syndrome: a study from 11 European countries. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 448-452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hasle H, Clemmensen IH, Mikkelsen M: Risks of leukaemia and solid tumours in individuals with Down's syndrome. Lancet. 2000, 355: 165-169. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05264-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baxter LL, Moran TH, Richtsmeier JT, Troncoso J, Reeves RH: Discovery and genetic localization of Down syndrome cerebellar phenotypes using the Ts65Dn mouse. Hum Mol Genet. 2000, 9: 195-202. 10.1093/hmg/9.2.195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sago H, Carlson EJ, Smith DJ, Kilbridge J, Rubin EM, Mobley WC, Epstein CJ, Huang TT: Ts1Cje, a partial trisomy 16 mouse model for Down syndrome, exhibits learning and behavioral abnormalities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 6256-6261. 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6256.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siarey RJ, Villar AJ, Epstein CJ, Galdzicki Z: Abnormal synaptic plasticity in the Ts1Cje segmental trisomy 16 mouse model of Down syndrome. Neuropharmacology. 2005, 49: 122-128. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.02.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris-Cerruti C, Kamsler A, Kaplan B, Lamb B, Segal M, Groner Y: Functional and morphological alterations in compound transgenic mice overexpressing Cu/Zn superoxide dismutaze and amyloid precursor protein. Eur J Neurosci. 2004, 19: 1174-1190. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03188.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roper RJ, Baxter LL, Saran NG, Klinedinst DK, Beachy PA, Reeves RH: Defective cerebellar response to mitogenic Hedgehog signaling in Down's syndrome mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103: 1452-1456. 10.1073/pnas.0510750103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lorenzi HA, Reeves RH: Hippocampal hypocellularity in the Ts65Dn mouse originates early in development. Brain Res. 2006, 1104: 153-159. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cooper JD, Salehi A, Delcroix JD, Howe CL, Belichenko PV, Chua-Couzens J, Kilbridge JF, Carlson EJ, Epstein CJ, Mobley WC: Failed retrograde transport of NGF in a mouse model of Down's syndrome: reversal of cholinergic neurodegenerative phenotypes following NGF infusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 10439-10444. 10.1073/pnas.181219298.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salehi A, Delcroix JD, Belichenko PV, Zhan K, Wu C, Valletta JS, Takimoto-Kimura R, Kleschevnikov AM, Sambamurti K, Chung PP, Xia W, Villar A, Campbell WA, Kulnane LS, Nixon RA, Lamb BT, Epstein CJ, Stokin GB, Goldstein LS, Mobley WC: Increased App expression in a mouse model of Down's syndrome disrupts NGF transport and causes cholinergic neuron degeneration. Neuron. 2006, 51: 29-42. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Insausti AM, Megias M, Crespo D, Cruz-Orive LM, Dierssen M, Vallina IF, Insausti R, Florez J: Hippocampal volume and neuronal number in Ts65Dn mice: a murine model of Down syndrome. Neurosci Lett. 1998, 253: 175-178. 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00641-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boue J, Deluchat C, Nicolas H, Boue A: Prenatal losses of trisomy 21. Hum Genet Suppl. 1981, 2: 183-193.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hassold T, Hunt P: To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet. 2001, 2: 280-291. 10.1038/35066065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shinohara T, Tomizuka K, Miyabara S, Takehara S, Kazuki Y, Inoue J, Katoh M, Nakane H, Iino A, Ohguma A, Ikegami S, Inokuchi K, Ishida I, Reeves RH, Oshimura M: Mice containing a human chromosome 21 model behavioral impairment and cardiac anomalies of Down's syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10: 1163-1175. 10.1093/hmg/10.11.1163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Doherty A, Ruf S, Mulligan C, Hildreth V, Errington ML, Cooke S, Sesay A, Modino S, Vanes L, Hernandez D, Linehan JM, Sharpe PT, Brandner S, Bliss TV, Henderson DJ, Nizetic D, Tybulewicz VL, Fisher EM: An aneuploid mouse strain carrying human chromosome 21 with down syndrome phenotypes. Science. 2005, 309: 2033-2037. 10.1126/science.1114535.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez D, Mee PJ, Martin JE, Tybulewicz VL, Fisher EM: Transchromosomal mouse embryonic stem cell lines and chimeric mice that contain freely segregating segments of human chromosome 21. Hum Mol Genet. 1999, 8: 923-933. 10.1093/hmg/8.5.923.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ming GL, Song H: Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian central nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005, 28: 223-250. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.051804.101459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christie BR, Cameron HA: Neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Hippocampus. 2006, 16: 199-207. 10.1002/hipo.20151.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olson LE, Roper RJ, Baxter LL, Carlson EJ, Epstein CJ, Reeves RH: Down syndrome mouse models Ts65Dn, Ts1Cje, and Ms1Cje/Ts65Dn exhibit variable severity of cerebellar phenotypes. Dev Dyn. 2004, 230: 581-589. 10.1002/dvdy.20079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olson LE, Roper RJ, Sengstaken CL, Peterson EA, Aquino V, Galdzicki Z, Siarey R, Pletnikov M, Moran TH, Reeves RH: Trisomy for the Down syndrome "critical region" is necessary but not sufficient for brain phenotypes of trisomic mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2007Google Scholar
- Ronan A, Fagan K, Christie L, Conroy J, Nowak N, Turner G: Familial 4.3Mb duplication of 21q22 sheds new light on the Down Syndrome Critical Region. J Med Genet. 2007Google Scholar
- McManus AP, O'Reilly MA, Jones KP, Gusterson BA, Mitchell CD, Pinkerton CR, Shipley JM: Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization detection of t(2;13)(q35;q14) in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma--a diagnostic tool in minimally invasive biopsies. J Pathol. 1996, 178: 410-414. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199604)178:4<410::AID-PATH508>3.0.CO;2-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- UniSTS database. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=unists]
- Unigene database. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=unigene]
- Reymond A, Marigo V, Yaylaoglu MB, Leoni A, Ucla C, Scamuffa N, Caccioppoli C, Dermitzakis ET, Lyle R, Banfi S, Eichele G, Antonarakis SE, Ballabio A: Human chromosome 21 gene expression atlas in the mouse. Nature. 2002, 420: 582-586. 10.1038/nature01178.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gitton Y, Dahmane N, Baik S, Ruiz i Altaba A, Neidhardt L, Scholze M, Herrmann BG, Kahlem P, Benkahla A, Schrinner S, Yildirimman R, Herwig R, Lehrach H, Yaspo ML: A gene expression map of human chromosome 21 orthologues in the mouse. Nature. 2002, 420: 586-590. 10.1038/nature01270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.