Common cellular events occur during wound healing and organ regeneration in the sea cucumber Holothuria glaberrima
© Miguel-Ruiz and García-Arrarás; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 06 December 2006
Accepted: 18 October 2007
Published: 18 October 2007
All animals possess some type of tissue repair mechanism. In some species, the capacity to repair tissues is limited to the healing of wounds. Other species, such as echinoderms, posses a striking repair capability that can include the replacement of entire organs. It has been reported that some mechanisms, namely extracellular matrix remodeling, appear to occur in most repair processes. However, it remains unclear to what extent the process of organ regeneration, particularly in animals where loss and regeneration of complex structures is a programmed natural event, is similar to wound healing. We have now used the sea cucumber Holothuria glaberrima to address this question.
Animals were lesioned by making a 3–5 mm transverse incision between one of the longitudinal muscle pairs along the bodywall. Lesioned tissues included muscle, nerve, water canal and dermis. Animals were allowed to heal for up to four weeks (2, 6, 12, 20, and 28 days post-injury) before sacrificed. Tissues were sectioned in a cryostat and changes in cellular and tissue elements during repair were evaluated using classical dyes, immmuohistochemistry and phalloidin labeling. In addition, the temporal and spatial distribution of cell proliferation in the animals was assayed using BrdU incorporation. We found that cellular events associated with wound healing in H. glaberrima correspond to those previously shown to occur during intestinal regeneration. These include: (1) an increase in the number of spherule-containing cells, (2) remodeling of the extracellular matrix, (3) formation of spindle-like structures that signal dedifferentiation of muscle cells in the area flanking the lesion site and (4) intense cellular division occurring mainly in the coelomic epithelium after the first week of regeneration.
Our data indicate that H. glaberrima employs analogous cellular mechanisms during wound healing and organ regeneration. Thus, it is possible that regenerative limitations in some organisms are due either to the absence of particular mechanisms associated with repair or the inability of activating the repair process in some tissues or stages.
For years, researchers have been perplexed by the differences in regeneration capabilities between animal species [1–6]. On the one hand, some species such as Planaria, Hydra or starfish can readily regenerate lost organs or body parts in a remarkable way. In contrast, other species, such as most vertebrates, Drosophila or C. elegans have limited regenerative capacities. Nonetheless, all species have some capacity to heal wounds produced by external factors encountered during their existence. What, if any, is the relationship between these two processes? There are some indications that these processes might differ at the cellular and molecular levels. For example, in sea urchins it has been suggested that healing of broken spines occurs by a morphallactic mechanism involving recruitment of differentiated cells, while regeneration of removed spines and pedicellaria occurs by an epimorphic process involving undifferentiated precursors . And in zebra fish, studies on fin regeneration have found that a fish mutant (dob- devoid of blastema) fails to regenerate the fin but has normal wound healing responses . More recently it has been shown that both wound healing and regeneration in the axolotl are dependent on epithelial/mesenchymal interactions, the formation of the wound epidermis, the restructuring of the extracellular matrix and other cellular/molecular events . These similarities led these authors to suggest that the regeneration capacities of these amphibians is basically a process of superhealing.
A related question that surfaces is whether regenerative processes in animals where regeneration is a common occurrence that follows autotomy or programmed organ loss, differ from those associated with wound healing? This has been suggested to occur in some animals where autotomy usually occurs in localized breakage zones giving rise to the possibility that the regeneration capacities of cells within these zones differ from those of cells in other parts of the animal. In fact, it has been proposed that animals that autotomize organs or appendages, such as echinoderms and arthropods, show a higher potency for regeneration [10, 11].
In answering these questions, it is crucial to determine what mechanisms are shared or differ between the processes of organ regeneration and that of wound healing. We have now used the holothurian or sea cucumber, Holothuria glaberrima, to study the relationship between the two processes. Holothurians are echinoderms, a group that comprise animals renowned for their regeneration capabilities [12, 13]. When exposed to noxious stimuli, H. glaberrima undergoes a programmed evisceration process where most of the digestive tract and associated organs are expelled from the body cavity [14, 15]. Following evisceration, it then regenerates new viscera, being the digestive system the first to be formed. Our group has used this model system extensively, showing that, following evisceration, a new intestine forms from a thickening in the remaining mesentery [14, 15]. The initial intestinal primordium consists of a solid tube that connects the esophagus with the cloaca. Eventually, a lumen is formed and the tube is organized into a functional intestine. The process of intestinal regeneration in H. glaberrima includes, cell division, cell migration, extracellular matrix remodeling and muscle de-differentiation [14, 16–19].
We now extend the use of this model system to study wound healing and to compare the events that take place during wound healing with those previously shown to occur during organ regeneration. To this end, a technique was developed to be able to cause an incision in the bodywall. In particular, the incision was made from the coelomic cavity side of the bodywall; a region that would normally not be subjected to wounds generated from the external environment and therefore cannot be considered a normal programmed event. The incision damaged nerve, muscle, dermal tissues and coelomic epithelia among others. Healing of the wound was then studied during the following 4 weeks. Changes in cellular and tissue elements during healing were evaluated using classical dyes, immmuohistochemistry and phalloidin labeling. Our results show that wound healing in these organisms makes use of the same mechanisms previously shown to occur during organ regeneration, to restore epithelial, dermal, and muscular tissues.
Overview of bodywall regeneration – Macroscopic
Upon dissecting the animals, the wound was observed under the dissection microscope prior to removing the bodywall section for further processing. The wound by 2 dpi was easily recognized as an oval-shaped fissure, perpendicular to the long axis of the pair of longitudinal muscles, whose borders presented clean cut edges. Inside this gap some tattoo ink could be seen scattered in the tissues; as well, the coelomic fluid contained round bodies 2–4 mm in diameter full of tattoo ink. Some scar tissue was already visible at the injury site by 6 dpi, especially in the dermis of the wall; furthermore, the muscle terminals had a rather smooth appearance and were slanted toward their respective wound edges. At 12 dpi, a connection of provisional matrix that linked the two separated longitudinal muscle terminals was visible; this connection was particularly evident in the medial region of the longitudinal axis of the muscles. The amount of this provisional matrix at the injury site continued increasing and expanding laterally throughout the subsequent healing stages, serving eventually to seal the wound. By 20 dpi the cavity had almost been filled and now only two small oval-shaped apertures parallel to the longitudinal muscles were visible, one at each side of the medial plane of the longitudinal muscle pair. However, the composition and appearance of this matrix was not that of the surrounding muscular tissue, being more translucent and not as dense. The wound was completely sealed by 28 dpi; nonetheless, it could be identified after careful inspection of the tissue, being somewhat recessed in relation to the rest of the muscle. Aside from this, the muscles seemed completely healed and even had the characteristic furrow between them, below which runs the radial nerve and the water canal.
Overview of bodywall regeneration – Microscopic
A. Bodywall staining with Toluidine Blue
B. Phalloidin labeling of the longitudinal muscle
At the injury site, none or little cell division was observed in 2 dpi animals. Cell division began at 6 dpi when about 12% of the cells were observed undergoing division (Fig. 4E). Soon after, by 12 dpi, division levels declined to about 6% and remained constant throughout the subsequent stages.
In the coelomic epithelia, cell division was scarce at 2 dpi; whether one looked at the coelomic epithelium proximal or distal to the injury site only an average of 2 % of cells were observed to be dividing (Fig. 4F). However, at 6 dpi an abrupt increase in cell division occurred both proximally and distally to the injury site. Although both proximal and distal coelomic epithelia showed an increase in cell division, the magnitude in the proximal epithelium was much higher. This increase was even more dramatic if one takes into account that the width of the coelomic epithelium increases during wound healing. In the sham-operated animals there was an increase in cell division in the coelomic epithelia in comparison to normal non-injured animals, but this was still significantly lower than in experimental animals. Furthermore, these control animals did not present the enlarged coelomic epithelium observed in injured animals. A substantial reduction in the extent of cell division took place in both proximal and distal epithelia at 12 dpi, where they exhibited a similar level of cell division. Still, cellular division in the proximal epithelia of injured animals was significantly higher in comparison to control animals. By 20 dpi and forward cell division in the proximal and distal epithelia returned to levels comparable to those of 2 dpi and control animals.
Little or no cell division occurred within the longitudinal muscles at 2 dpi (Fig. 4G). This was followed by a sudden peak in cell division proximal to the injury site at 6 dpi. Control animals presented a small number of scattered BrdU-positive cells within the proximal longitudinal muscle. These numbers were higher than those seen in animals that had not been sham-operated but still remained significantly different when compared those in experimental animals. At 12 dpi, the difference in cell division in the proximal muscle had diminished but remained significantly higher than in control animals. From this stage forth, cell division continued decreasing steadily until 28 dpi, when no cell division was observable in the proximal muscle. Cell division distal to the injury site remained similar from 2 dpi until 20 dpi; beyond this stage practically no cell division was detected distally.
During bodywall regeneration striking changes in the collagenous content recognized by HgCol were observed in the connective tissue of the dermis. Alterations in collagen distribution were observed as soon as 2 dpi, where most of the collagen bundles near the injury site had disappeared and the remaining few appeared largely disorganized. At this stage, remodeling of the ECM was limited to about a 1 mm radius of connective tissue around the injury site. Collagen disappearance was even more evident at 6 dpi; less collagen labeling was found and the connective tissue area from where the collagen had disappeared had extended as far as 2 mm from the injury site. By 12 dpi reappearance of collagen bundles in the bodywall was seen in the dense connective tissue of the dermis, proximal to the coelomic cavity. Still, the arrangement of collagen bundles was disordered. Reconditioning of the ECM to a state resembling non-injured dermis was observed by 20 dpi; at this stage collagen bundles were again parallel and well-stretched. In spite of this, it is important to mention that, even at 28 dpi, collagen labeling was not present in the connective tissue deposited directly at the wound site.
We observed changes in both cellular populations during the wound healing process. The spherulocyte population appeared to increase near the injury site. Spherulocytes were also observed to go through a striking alteration in their morphology. Cells that were present distant to the injury site, similar to those found in controls and non-injured animals, were round or oval and possessed well defined spherules within their cytoplasm. When these cells were in close proximity to the injury their spherules were no longer discernable and the labeling appeared less intense and seemed to extend into the extracellular matrix. To quantify the changes in the spherulocyte population, the number of cells were counted near the injury site and compared with cell numbers distant to the site and in control animals (Fig. 6E). By 2 dpi, the spherulocyte population already showed a twofold increase in numbers. The changes in cell number and morphology continued during 6–12 dpi. At latter stages (20–28 dpi) cell numbers returned to levels comparable to those of non-injured animals, however, some cells still showed morphological alterations; their spherules were not clearly discernable. An important observation that needs to be emphasized was that while the number of spherulocytes near the injury site increased during the wound healing period, a 32 % decline in their numbers was detected in areas of the dermis distal to the injury site, suggesting that cells were migrating from non-injured areas to the injury site.
The second spherule-containing cell population, the morulas, was also observed to increase in number in response to injury (Fig. 6F). Clustering of these cells near and at the dermal edge created by the incision began as early as in the 2 dpi stage, when a three-fold increase in their numbers could be observed. This peak in cell number was maintained until 12 dpi, after which cell numbers declined to quantities similar to those in normal animals. These cells also showed a parallel decline in their numbers distally to the injury site at stages where an increase from basal levels was registered proximally. A distinctive characteristic of this cell population was that, although they appeared to migrate to the injury site, only a few showed a change in morphology.
Formation of spindle-like structures (SLS's)
Formation of SLS's, was observed within the cells of the circular muscle bands during the healing process. These muscles encircle the coelomic cavity and are surrounded on the dermal side by a dense lattice of collagen fibrils and on the coelomic side by the coelomic epithelium. In the area where the circular muscle band had been ruptured by the injury, SLS's were first noticeable in both muscle sides at 2 dpi. At 6 dpi, they began appearing farther away from the lesion point, on the muscle band contiguous with the terminals created by the injury (Fig. 7B). Peak occurrence of SLS's in the circular muscle bands also took place at 6 dpi, followed by a sudden decline in their frequency at 12 dpi. From this point forward they gradually disappeared to the point of no being detected at 28 dpi. It is noticeable that SLS's ejected from muscle cells into the collagen rich lacunae of the bodywall appeared to remain attached to the dedifferentiating muscle cell by the presence of a cellular extension or linker that labels with Phalloidin and was mainly observed during the 6–12 dpi period (Fig. 7C). In contrast, SLS's discarded to the coelomic surface appeared to be unattached to the remaining muscle cells.
A similar tendency in SLS's formation was observed within the cells of the longitudinal muscle. At 2 dpi, formation of SLS's was restricted to the terminals of muscle tissue adjacent to the lesion. However, at 6 dpi SLS's were present farther away from the lesion area and in the distal regions of the muscle band (Fig. 7D–E). An abrupt deterioration in the muscle organization was also observed, specifically a reduction in the cohesiveness of muscles bundles to the point where individual bundles could be seen. SLS formation decreased at later wound healing stages (Fig. 7F–G).
Quantification of SLS formation was performed to determine the temporal aspects of changes in the muscle structure (Fig. 7H). SLS's were counted per field of view at different wound healing stages. The peak in SLS formation was shown to occur at 6 dpi. Not only were there more SLS's counted per area, but these could be detected as far as 6 mm from the lesion point. By 12 dpi muscle fibers organization was greatly improved and the presence of SLS's confined once more to muscle terminals. From 12 dpi and forth SLS's continued declining, where at 28 dpi little or none could be seen, and muscle organization was virtually comparable to that of an unlesioned animal. If SLS's were present at this stage these were mostly restricted to the injured muscle or to where the overlapping muscle bundles from opposing stumps were in contact. At all stages, formation of SLS's in the longitudinal muscle was predominantly restricted to the coelomic surface of the muscle.
Retractor muscles in Papillate Podia (non-locomotory protrusions)
Retractor muscles in the papillate podia, or non-locomotory protrusions, of H. glaberrima were also observed to form SLS's in their muscle cells in response to the injury. This phenomenon was more conspicuous in the retractor muscles immediately below the injury. At 2 dpi, these muscles presented an intermediate level of SLS's occurrence. It was at 6 dpi when most SLS's were observed and a large of number accumulated inside the papillate pits. At 12 dpi SLS's had decreased drastically; and from there on little if any SLS's were observed in these tissues.
Here we have described the process of wound healing in the echinoderm H. glaberrima and some of the cellular events that take place during this process. We will first discuss the healing process itself in view of what has been described in the literature for other echinoderm species. However, our main interest in undergoing this study was to compare the cellular events that occur during wound healing to those that occur during organ regeneration. By far what has attracted the attention of scientists to the echinoderms has been their capacity to regenerate following autotomy, where the detachment of the limbs or organs serves a defensive function . In most cases regeneration following autotomy involves not only the restitution of particular tissues but the complete formation of an organ or arm. Nonetheless, certain aspects of regeneration, particularly those that occur early in the process and are involved with the healing of the cut or severed surface, can serve as points of comparison to our results.
Therefore, the main part of this discussion will focus on the four events studied: (1) cell proliferation (2) increase in spherule-containing cells (3) ECM remodeling and (4) SLSs formation (and its association with muscle dedifferentiation) and the comparison to intestinal regeneration.
Wound healing in the holothuria
There are surprisingly few studies describing wound healing in echinoderms and even those that study wound healing show some differences between them. Two studies have focused on cutaneous wound healing: one in Stichopus badionotus  and a second one in Thyone briareus . Both groups of investigators show that wounds heal rapidly (2–3 weeks) with little or no cell division during the early healing stages, but with abundant cell migration. However, they report different findings on the type of cells that migrate and might be involved in the healing process. Our results are consistent in also showing rapid wound healing, little cell proliferation during early stages and changes in cell number that suggest cellular migration toward the wound site. However, our results are not wholly comparable since the previous studies were done following cutaneous injuries that did not affect the musculature while our injury was done on the coelomic side of the bodywall and caused damage to muscular, nervous and dermal tissues. In addition our results show other cellular events that went unnoticed to the previous investigators probably due to, differences in species, in wound type or most probably because of technical limitations.
As mentioned above, there has been some controversy as to the role of the spherule-containing cells in wound healing in holothurians. For the sake of this discussion, we would refer to two types of spherule-containing cells: morula cells, that are labeled with classical histological dyes [21–23] and spherulocytes that are labeled by our monoclonal antibodies . An initial study on the morula cells during superficial cutaneous wound healing in the sea cucumber Stichopus badionotus found no significant change in their numbers, thus, suggesting that this cell type does not play an important role . However, more recent works in two other sea cucumber species, Thyone briareus and Eupentacta quinquesemita question this conclusion [22, 23]. They found that numerous morula cells accumulate in the hypodermis of the wound area during the first two days following excision of a portion of the integument . They also report that in incision wounds, the morula cells invade the wound area in large numbers. Similarly, studies of the changes that occur in E. quinquesemita during introvert dermis evisceration and regeneration, suggest that morula cells accumulate in regenerating extracellular matrix and provide some of the ground substance material for tissue repair .
Our results are in accordance with an important role for morula cells in the wound healing process of holothurians. The increase in number at the injury site during the early stages of wound healing surely suggests that they are somehow involved in the process. Moreover, the fact that their numbers in nearby (non-injured) areas diminish also suggest that morula cells are being actively recruited into the injured area. Differences of these studies with others  could be due to the latter only doing superficial injuries or to species differences.
When wound healing is compared to intestinal regeneration one observes, that in contrast to their role in wound healing, morula cells do not appear to play an important role in intestinal regeneration. Although they are present within the regenerating intestine, their numbers actually decrease during the initial stages of regeneration .
Spherulocytes appear to be also involved in the process of wound healing. Moreover the changes observed in these cell types during wound healing parallel those observed during intestinal regeneration . In both wound healing and regeneration the number of these cells, localized in the connective tissue, increases. In addition, during both processes they also undergo a dramatic change in their morphology. Complementary to this change in morphology is the alteration seen in the labeling pattern, which is no longer restricted to the interior of the cells but seems to be on the extracellular matrix suggesting that they are releasing their vesicular components into the extracellular matrix. Finally, during wound healing spherulocytes appear to migrate from the adjacent dermis into the wound site. Similarly, during intestinal regeneration, spherulocytes appear to migrate into the regenerating intestine via the mesentery connective tissue .
Finally, our results provide for some interesting comparisons between the morula and spherulocyte populations. It has been proposed that the different spherule-containing cell populations reflected cells at different stages of maturation, where the deeply stained cells were younger, and as they matured, their granules were only weakly stained . Based on this, we had previously proposed that spherulocytes were morula cells at a later stage in their maturation . However, the present data questions this interpretation since they show that both morula and spherulocyte populations increase concomitantly, and both appear to migrate into the wound area. Moreover, less than 5% of the cells are labeled with both the antibody and the histological stain. Thus, the data is more consonant with both cell types being independent cell types rather than being the same cell type at different maturation stages.
The consensus among investigators that have studied holothurians is that little cell proliferation occurs during the early stages of wound healing and that most of the repair in the early stages is accomplished by displacement of cells rather than by proliferation. This has been reported in the sea cucumbers Stichopus badionotus and Thyone briareus where no significant mitotic figures were observed during the early stages of cutaneous wound healing [21, 22]. Our result showing that less than 2% of cells are dividing at 2 dpi certainly fits within what has been found in other studies.
Although the small amount of cellular proliferation that takes place during the early stages of wound healing might seem surprising, this is somewhat similar to what has been found to occur during regenerative events in holothurians. In our previous studies using BrdU labeling during intestinal regeneration in H. glaberrima, a small level of proliferation was documented during the early days of intestinal regeneration, while the increase in cellular proliferation occurs between 7–14 days . Similar results have been documented in other species using other techniques; in Stichopus mollis by counting mitotic figures  and in Eupenctata fraudatrix using radioactive thymidine [26–29]. Thus, once again in the sea cucumber, the wound healing events are similar to those found during organ regeneration.
Another resemblance between wound healing and intestinal regeneration, is that in both processes the coelomic epithelium stands out as a center of cell proliferation. This was observed in our previous studies of intestinal regeneration in H. glaberrima where the division of the coelomic epithelial cells was much higher than those within the connective tissue . Similar percentages in cellular division of the coelomic epithelia were found in this study following wound healing. The important role of the coelomic epithelia in cell proliferation during regenerative events seems to be a common theme to many echinoderm species, having been shown to occur in crinoid arm regeneration  and in arm and pyloric caeca regeneration in starfish [31, 32]. Moreover, the proliferation of the coelomic epithelia appears to play a significant role in the restitution of echinoderm tissues since it has been proposed these cells give rise to other cellular types and not only coelomic cells [18, 29, 33, 34].
Cell proliferation also plays an important role in the wound healing of other animals. In mammals, where it has been best studied, a proliferative phase takes place usually 3–5 days following injury [35, 36]. Some of the proliferating cells are fibroblast that migrate and proliferate in response to growth factors and eventually play a role in the synthesis and deposition of ECM.
There is little discussion of changes within the ECM in previous reports of holothurian wound healing or for that matter in reports of regeneration following autotomy. There are reports of loosening of the ECM fibrils near the wound site  and of a zone of degeneration in the deeper collagen bundles , but little additional descriptions are provided. Collagen deposition appears to occur rather fast, within a few days of cutaneous wounding in S. badionotus . The difference between this report and our findings where, collagen deposition occurs much later might be due to the limited amount of damage in previous studies, where only the epidermis needs to be restored prior to the new ECM being deposited. In contrast, in our studies where other tissues, such as muscle and nerve, need to be healed it might be necessary to maintain a temporary matrix for a longer period prior to the deposition of the permanent one. However, the differences between the previous report and our data might also be explained by technical limitations in identifying particular ECM molecules or changes in ECM, at the time those experiments were performed.
Previous experiments from our laboratory have shown that during regeneration of the intestine in H. glaberrima there is a striking remodeling of the extracellular matrix within the mesentery . Among the features of this ECM remodeling are changes in ECM components, activation of matrix metalloproteases and the increased presence of cells involved in matrix degradation and matrix deposition [16, 19, 24]. One of the hallmarks of the ECM remodeling is the disappearance of ECM collagen, particularly from the mesenterial ECM close to the regenerating intestine. Our results with wound healing show noteworthy similarities to the events that occur during intestinal regeneration. In particular, the disappearance of collagen immunoreactivity in the wounded area and in areas adjacent to the wound, and the temporal scheme in which this occurs. Collagen immunoreactivity diminishes greatly within the two weeks that follow the injury and this decrease occurs not only in the tissue that has been wounded but extends to nearby tissue. During regeneration, collagen also disappears from the mesentery adjacent to the regenerating intestine and a gradient in its disappearance is also observed as one moves from the mesentery edge towards the bodywall.
That ECM changes occur during wound healing of the sea cucumber bodywall is not surprising, since such changes have been associated with the healing of wound in all, if not most, animals where it has been studied. For example, during skin wound healing in mammals, the ECM collagen is degraded and replaced with a temporary matrix [35, 37]. This temporary matrix is eventually degraded once the tissues are regenerated and collagen is once again restituted . Similar events have been documented in other organisms following injury . However, one of the consistent findings that differentiate the holothurians from other species is the timing of the response. Collagen disappearance occurs during a 1–2 week period following either injury or evisceration and the reposition of collagen occurs 1–2 weeks afterwards. In contrast in mammals and other species, collagen is degraded and restituted much faster.
Recent findings from our laboratory have shown that muscle cells in the mesentery of H. glaberrima undergo a process of dedifferentiation during intestinal regeneration . This process can be followed by the appearance of spindle-like structures (SLS's) that are formed from the muscle contractile apparatus. In fact, the formation of SLS's has been shown to be a definite signal of muscle dedifferentiation in echinoderms [27–29, 34]. During intestinal regeneration in H. glaberrima, these SLS's are formed by the muscle cells located in the mesentery and are then eliminated either into the coelomic cavity or phagocytized by amebocytes in the connective tissue.
There are various similarities between the process of muscle dedifferentiation in intestinal regeneration and wound healing. First, cellular dedifferentiation as determined by SLS's formation occurs during the first and second week following the traumatic event. Second, some of the SLS's are eliminated into the coelomic cavity. An additional similarity is that the dedifferentiation process appears to occur in a gradient, showing high levels close to the injury site and lower levels as one moves distant from the injury site. Such a gradient suggests the presence of a soluble diffusing molecule that might be responsible for muscle dedifferentiation. In this respect, it is interesting that a soluble factor from serum that appears to play a similar role in the dedifferentiation of amphibian myocytes has been partially characterized .
Muscle dedifferentiation and formation of SLS's is not restricted to holothurian species. It has been documented in various other echinoderm species undergoing regenerative processes including visceral and longitudinal muscles of sea cucumbers [27, 28, 34, 41, 42] and crinoid arm muscle [34, 42]. Likewise, elimination of the contractile apparatus and formation of de-differentiated cells from muscle cells has been documented in many other invertebrate and vertebrate species during regenerative procedures. Examples of these are the muscle cell dedifferentiation that occurs during annelid regeneration [43, 44] and in amphibian tail and limb regeneration [45–47]. Thus, available data strongly suggest that muscle dedifferentiation is an important component of regeneration processes.
The graphs also serve to highlight the temporal sequence of the evisceration/wound healing related events. It seems, that the cellular event that occurs earlier in both processes is the dedifferentiation of muscle cells. The highest numbers of SLS's are usually observed within the first two weeks and decay thereafter. Other events peak during the second week of regeneration/wound healing. Of particular interest is the fact that little cell division occurs during the days following injury or evisceration and that most of the cell division occurs at the end of the first week or during the second week, thus suggesting that the initial cells involved in wound healing and regeneration processes are mainly cells already found within the tissues or cells that result from the dedifferentiation event. Experiments are in progress to determine the role that the dedifferentiated cell population plays in the regeneration and wound healing processes.
Comparisons between non-regenerating animals and holothurians
In an essay entitled "What controls organ regeneration?", Davenport  states that in order to understand the mysteries of regeneration it will be necessary to determine what separates the human (or mammal) wound healing process from that of animals that are able to regenerate. Our data provides some light into this issue. Two of the cellular events, cell proliferation and ECM remodeling, are observed in non-regenerating species during wound healing. However, there might still be some differences between these processes and those found in animals capable of organ regeneration. For example, cell division usually is documented to occur much faster in mammalian wound healing than what we have documented for holothurians. But in other regenerating species cell proliferation is known to occur widely. In fact, regeneration processes have been traditionally divided into epimorphic processes where high cell proliferation occurs within a blastema and morphallactic processes where little or no cell division occurs and the new organ is formed from pre-existing cells [3, 13]. Thus, it is unlikely that the pattern of cell division can serve to differentiate animals capable of extensive regeneration from those whose regenerative properties are limited.
In contrast, there appears to be some notable differences among regenerating and non-regenerating animals in terms of ECM remodeling. In H. glaberrima ECM remodeling extends over weeks rather than days and the peak in both collagen disappearance as well as in its deposition appears to be much later than during wound healing in mammals. ECM remodeling has been highlighted as one of the mechanisms that is found to occur widely in animals capable of organ and limb regeneration. It has been shown to occur during newt limb regeneration [39, 49–52] rat liver regeneration , Hydra head regeneration [54, 55] and zebrafish fin regeneration . In mice, ECM remodeling, and in particular the activity of the matrix metalloproteinases, has been shown to correlate with the regeneration ability of two mice species: those where the activity of the enzymes is higher and last longer show better healing of ear wounds . Therefore, the timing and extent of ECM remodeling might be an important factor associated with the enhanced regeneration capacities.
Comparisons between regenerating and non-regenerating animals, in terms of the population of spherulocytes are not practical at this time. First, because, their role in holothurians is not clear. They have been associated to the production of a transitory ECM [23, 24] but have also been implicated in defense mechanisms [58–60]. Second, because it is uncertain if they have analogous cell type in other species. Some investigators have suggested they are similar to mast cells [21, 22, 24] but this possibility remains undetermined. Nonetheless, the association of this cell type with the process of wound healing and regeneration in holothurians is worth further exploration, particularly in view of their capacity to release their vesicular contents which might include not only ECM components but growth factors, cytokines and other molecules associated with the cellular events that have been observed.
Out of the four cellular events that occur during holothurian wound healing and regeneration, the only one that appears to be prominent in regenerating species but not to occur in poor regenerators is the dedifferentiation of muscle cells. As discussed above, this process has been documented in various animal species ranging from annelids to amphibians. Moreover, the process could be the source of stem cells that eventually provide the different cell phenotypes necessary for the formation of the new organ [61, 62]. Such a possibility has been explored by the laboratory of Tanaka [6, 47] showing that, in amphibian tadpoles, cells that originate from muscle cell dedifferentiation gave rise to a variety of cell types. The process of dedifferentiation is not limited to muscle cells. In fact, other cells have been shown to dedifferentiate during the process of regeneration. The best documented is the dedifferentiation of the dorsal iris cells to produce the new lens in salamanders . While recently, it has been shown that dedifferentiation of digestive cells into blastema-like cells occurs in Hydra during head regeneration . Therefore, cell dedifferentiation might be one of the key processes that separate good regenerators from poor regenerators. Thus as has been suggested by Han and colleagues  "gaining access to developmentally regulated programs (dedifferentiation) lies at the heart of the regeneration problem in mammals".
The cellular events that occur during wound healing in H. glaberrima, namely the pattern of cell division, increase in the spherulocyte population, ECM remodeling, and muscle dedifferentiation are similar to those that take place during intestinal regeneration. Thus, our results show that, at least in H. glaberrima, but probably in most echinoderms that undergo organ or arm regeneration following autotomy, the same processes that are used for regeneration of complex structures are used for wound healing. Of the four events, muscle dedifferentiation appears to be a common mechanism to animals that posses a high regeneration capacity thus suggesting that this mechanism is of great importance to the regeneration process in metazoans.
Holothuria glaberrimaspecimens were collected in the northeast coast of Puerto Rico and maintained in the laboratory in recirculating seawater aquaria with constant oxygenation.
Animals were eviscerated by injecting 0.35 M KCl (3–5 ml) into the coelomic cavity. One hour following evisceration, animals were anesthetized by submersion in 0.2% 1,1,1-Trichloro-2-methyl-2-propanol hydrate (chlorobutanol) in sea water. Once they were fully relaxed, approximately 10 min, exposure of the longitudinal muscle was achieved by pushing the bodywall from the outside with a blunt rod through the cloaca. This left exposed nearly 2 cm of the dorsal wall that faces the coelomic cavity, hence, providing accurate and easy access to the longitudinal muscle. The injury was performed by making a perpendicular incision with a scalpel between the longitudinal muscle bands, 3–4 cm anterior to the cloaca and about 2 cm from the point of stress. Injured tissues included longitudinal muscle, circular muscle, radial nerve, water canal, bodywall dermis and coelomic epithelia. Control animals were subjected to the same inversion procedure except that no lesion was made. In the experimental animals, the injury extended 1–1.5 mm into the inner dense layer of the dermis and the lesion site was then marked with red tattoo ink to be able to identify it later during dissection. Animals were returned to the aquaria and allowed to heal for different days (2, 6, 12, 20, and 28) post-injury (dpi). Before sacrificed, animals were again anesthetized with chlorobutanol, dissected, pinned and initially fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde poured directly into the dissecting dish for 30 min. The area around the incision was then localized and a 6 mm × 12 mm rectangle was dissected and kept overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde. Tissues were maintained in 30% sucrose until use. All dissections were carried out using a Wild-M5A dissecting microscope (Wild Heerbrugg, Switzerland).
Bodywall fragments were embedded in OCT embedding medium (Tissue Tek OCT; Miles Inc.), frozen at -20°C and longitudinally sectioned (20 μm) in a cryostat (Leica CM 1900). Sections were recovered on poly-lysine-treated slides, left to dry for at least 1 hr under cold air and stored until use. All sections used for data analysis were from bodywall tissues not farther away than 200 μm from the medial plane of the longitudinal muscle pair, where the distance across the injury was greatest. Proximal regions were 0.5 mm from the injury site while distal regions were 5 mm away, approximately. Images were recorded and analyzed using the MetaVue software (version 6.0; Universal Imaging, Inc.).
Morphometric analysis – muscle regeneration
To assess the progress of wound healing, the distance between muscle stumps labeled with phalloidin were measured from 10× micrographs at different stages (2, 6, 12, 20, 28 dpi). For each specimen, five to ten sections were analyzed under fluorescence microscopy and the shortest distance, for each animal, between the muscle terminals was recorded.
Also, the extent of muscle regeneration was quantified by measuring the length of the regenerated fiber from the muscle stump to the farthest point in the regenerating front. For each animal, five to six measurements were taken and the mean value was calculated for each animal, pooled with other values for that same stage, then a final mean was calculated.
Chemical Dyes – toluidine blue
Slides with longitudinal sections of the bodywall were used to determine the temporal progress of healing in the injured tissues. Cryostat tissue sections were treated with Toludine blue as described by Presnell and Schreibman . In brief, the sections were rinsed in PBS for 2 min, and then immersed in dye solution for 2 min. They were then rinsed in PBS, mounted in buffered glycerol phosphate and viewed under the microscope. In some cases, staining was done on tissue sections previously processed for immunohistochemistry (see below).
The immunohistochemical procedures used have been described elsewhere [14–16, 18, 65] Cryostat tissue sections were treated with goat serum (1:50), permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 and incubated overnight with the corresponding primary antibody: Anti-BrdU (1:5, Amersham), Sph2 supernatant  or HgCol supernatant  in a humid chamber. The following day, sections were rinsed in PBS and treated with the FITC-labeled goat-anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:50, BioSource Int.). For double labeling, phalloidin-rhodamine (1:200, Sigma) was added together with the primary antibody. Sections were rinsed again in PBS and mounted in buffered glycerol. Double or triple labeling with Hoechst nuclear dye (Sigma) was done by immersing slides in 1 μM Hoescht for 15 min after the primary antibody [14, 18]. Sections were examined and photographed using a Nikon E600 microscope equipped with FITC, R/DII and DAPI filters. Images were recorded using the MetaVue software (version 6.0; Universal Imaging, Inc.).
Spherule-containing cell counts
The number of spherule-cells labeled by immunological (Sph2) and histological (Toluidine blue) stains were quantified by counting the number of labeled cells in an area of 280 mm2 (the microscope field of view using the 40× objective). For these experiments we used longitudinal sections of the bodywall labeled with Sph2 and stained with Toluidine Blue simultaneously; previous testing confirmed that the dye Toluidine Blue did not affect Sph2 labeling. Cell numbers were obtained from the inner (dense) layer of dermis proximal and distal to the injury site at various stages during the wound healing period. Cell counts were done in two fields of view chosen at random for each corresponding area in every animal and in at least three animals per stage of regeneration. Student's t test and ANOVA's were used for statistical analyses.
Quantification of spindle-like structures (SLS's)
Previous work from our laboratory and that of others has shown that muscle cells can dedifferentiate forming spindle-like structures [19, 27]. To examine if muscle cell de-differentiation was taking place during wound healing and the possible extent of this occurrence, the numbers of SLS's present in longitudinal muscles of similar width were tallied. Measurements were made at all stages, both distally and proximally to the injury site, in two fields of view (20×) for each corresponding area in at least three animals per stage. Student's t test and ANOVA's were used for statistical analyses.
ECM remodeling – collagen degradation
Analysis of the changes in the extracellular matrix during wound healing was possible on account of the HgCol antibody . For this purpose, 10× micrographs of labeled tissue sections of the wounded areas were taken with the microscope under the same illumination conditions and time exposure settings. To quantify collagen disappearance, the total area in the dermis of the bodywall with no immunoreactivity for collagen was determined. Images were recorded and analyzed using the MetaVue software (version 6.0; Universal Imaging, Inc.).
The temporal and spatial distribution of cell proliferation in the healing animals was assayed using BrdU incorporation. Animals were injected intracoelomically at 2, 6, 12, 20 and 28 dpi with 100 μl of a 1 mg/ml BrdU solution (approximately 0.01 mg/g wet weight) and sacrificed 24 hrs after. Tissues were fixed and treated as described above for immunohistochemistry. Antibodies against BrdU (Amersham) were used to detect cells that had incorporated BrdU. Immunocytochemistry was performed as described above including an additional bath of 0.05 N HCl for 1 h prior to addition of the BrdU antibody, to improve the accessibility of the antibody to the BrdU epitope, followed by an additional 15 min PBS wash.
The labeling index was obtained by counting the number of cells labeled with BrdU divided by the total number of Hoescht-labeled nuclei per microscope field of view. For the longitudinal muscles and their epithelia a mean value for two corresponding areas in each animal was calculated. At least 3 different animals were used for each wound healing stage. Measurements were made at the injury site as well as proximal and distal from the injury site.
Funded by NSF (IBN-0110692), NIH-MBRS (S06GM08102), NIH-RCMI (RRO-3641-01) and the University of Puerto Rico. JSMR is a fellow of the NIH-MARC Program.
- Brockes JP, Kumar A: Plasticity and reprogramming of differentiated cells in amphibian regeneration. Nature Rev. 2002, 3: 566-574. 10.1038/nrm881.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brockes JP, Kumar A, Velloso CP: Regeneration as an evolutionary variable. J Anat. 2001, 199: 3-11. 10.1017/S0021878201008299.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez-Alvarado A: Regeneration in the metazoans: why does it happen?. BioEssays. 2000, 22: 578-590. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200006)22:6<578::AID-BIES11>3.0.CO;2-#.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez-Alvarado A: Regeneration and the need for simpler model organisms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004, 359: 759-763. 10.1098/rstb.2004.1465.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsonis PA: Regeneration in vertebrates. Dev Biol. 2000, 221: 273-284. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9667.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka EM: Cell differentiation and cell fate during urodele tail and limb regeneration. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2003, 13: 497-501. 10.1016/j.gde.2003.08.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dubois P, Ameye L: Regeneration of spines and pedicellarieae in echinoderms: A review. Microsc Res Tech. 2001, 55: 427-437. 10.1002/jemt.1188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitehead GG, Makino S, Lien C-L, Keating MT: fgf20 is essential for initiating zebrafish fin regeneration. Science. 2005, 310: 1957-1960. 10.1126/science.1117637.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roy S, Levesque M: Limb regeneration in Axolotl: is it superhealing?. TSW Dev Embryol. 2006, 1 (S1): 12-15. 10.1100/tswde.2006.113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Needham AE: Regeneration in the arthropoda and its endocrine control. Regeneration in animals and related problems. Edited by: Kiortsis V, Trampusch HAL. 1965, North-Holland Publishing Co. Amsterdam, 283-323.Google Scholar
- Swan EF: Growth, Autotomy and Regeneration. Physiology of Echinodermata. Edited by: Boolootian RA. 1966, Interscience Publishers, 397-434.Google Scholar
- Hyman LH: The Invertebrates: Echinodermata. 1955, McGraw-Hill, New York, 4:Google Scholar
- Candia-Carnevali MD: Regeneration in Echinoderms: repair, regrowth, cloning. ISJ. 2006, 3: 64-76.Google Scholar
- García-Arrarás JE, Estrada-Rodgers L, Santiago R, Torres II, Díaz-Miranda L, Torres-Avillán I: Cellular mechanisms of intestine regeneration in the sea cucumber, Holothuria glaberrima. J Comp Neurol. 1998, 406: 461-475. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990419)406:4<461::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- García-Arrarás JE, Greenberg MC: Visceral regeneration in holothurians. Microsc Res Tech. 2001, 55: 438-451. 10.1002/jemt.1189.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quiñones JL, Rosa R, Ruiz DL, García-Arrarás JE: Extracellular matrix remodeling involvement during intestine regeneration in the sea cucumber Holothuria glaberrima. Dev Biol. 2002, 250: 181-197. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0778.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cabrera-Serrano A, García-Arrarás JE: RGD-containing peptides inhibit intestinal regeneration in the sea cucumber Holothuria glaberrima. Dev Dyn. 2004, 231: 171-178. 10.1002/dvdy.20112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murray G, García-Arrarás JE: Myogenesis during holothurian intestinal regeneration. Cell Tissue Res. 2004, 318: 515-524. 10.1007/s00441-004-0978-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Candelaria AG, Murray G, File SK, García-Arrarás JE: Contribution of mesenterial muscle dedifferentiation to intestine regeneration in the sea cucumber Holothuria glaberrima. Cell Tissue Res. 2006, 325: 55-65. 10.1007/s00441-006-0170-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilkie IC: Autotomy as a prelude to regeneration in echinoderms. Microsc Res Tech. 2001, 55: 369-398. 10.1002/jemt.1185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cowden RR: Cytological and histochemical observations on connective tissue cells and cutaneous wound healing in the sea cucumber Stichopus badionotus. J Invert Pathol. 1968, 10: 151-159. 10.1016/0022-2011(68)90275-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Menton DN, Eisen AZ: Cutaneous wound healing in the sea cucumber Thyone briareus. J Morph. 1973, 141: 185-204. 10.1002/jmor.1051410206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Byrne M: The ultrastructure of the morula cells of Eupenctacta quinquesemita (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) and their role in the maintenance of the extracellular matrix. J Morphol. 1986, 188: 179-189. 10.1002/jmor.1051880205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- García-Arrarás JE, Schenk C, Rodrígues-Ramírez R, Torres II, Valentín G, Candelaria AG: Spherulocytes in the echinoderm Holothuria glaberrima and their involvement in intestinal regeneration. Dev Dyn. 2006, 235: 3259-3267. 10.1002/dvdy.20983.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dawbin WH: Auto-evisceration and the regeneration of viscera in the holothurian Eupentacta fraudatrix (Holothuria, Dendrochirota). Monogr Dev Biol. 1949, Basel:Karger, 23: 40-50.Google Scholar
- Leibson NL: Regeneration of digestive tube in holothurians Stichopus japonicus and Eupentacta fraudatrix. Monogr Dev Biol. 1992, 23: 51-61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dolmatov IY: Regeneration of aquapharyngeal complex in the holothurian Eupentacta fraudatrix (Holothuria, Dendrochitrota). Monogr Dev Biol. 1992, 23: 40-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dolmatov IY, Ginanova TT: Muscle regeneration in holothurians. Microsc Res Tech. 2001, 55: 452-463. 10.1002/jemt.1190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dolmatov IY, Eliseikina MG, Bulgakov AA, Ginanova TT, Lamash NE, Korchagin VP: Muscle regeneration in the holothurian Stichopus japonicus. Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 1996, 205: 486-493. 10.1007/BF00377230.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Candia-Carnevali MD, Bonasoro F, Lucca E, Thorndyke MC: Pattern of cell proliferation in the early stages of arm regeneration in the feather star Antedon mediterranea. J Exp Zool. 1995, 272: 464-474. 10.1002/jez.1402720608.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anderson JM: Studies on visceral regeneration in the sea-stars. II. Regeneration of pyloric caeca in Asteriidae, with notes on the source of cells in regenerating organs. Biol Bull. 1965, 128: 1-23. 10.2307/1539385.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mladenov PV, Bisgrove B, Asotra S, Burke R: Mechanisms of the arm-tip regeneration in the sea star, Leptasterias hexactis. Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 1989, 198: 19-28. 10.1007/BF00376366.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- VandenSpiegel D, Jangoux M, Flammang P: Maintaining the line of defense: Regeneration of Cuvierian tubules in the sea cucumber Holothuria forskali (Echinodermata, Holothuroidea). Biol Bull. 2000, 198: 34-49. 10.2307/1542802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Candia-Carnevali MD, Bonasoro F: Microscopic overview of crinoid regeneration. Microsc Res Tech. 2001, 55: 403-426. 10.1002/jemt.1187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark RAF: Wound Repair. Overview and general considerations. The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair. Edited by: Clark RAF. 1996, Plenum Press NY, 3-50.Google Scholar
- Diegelmann RF, Evans MC: Wound healing: An overview of acute, fibrotic and delayed healing. Frontiers in Biosci. 2004, 9: 283-289. 10.2741/1184.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martin P: Wound healing-aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science. 1997, 276: 75-87. 10.1126/science.276.5309.75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamada KM, Clark RAF: Provisional matrix. The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair. Edited by: Clark RAF. 1996, Plenum Press NY, 51-93.Google Scholar
- Yang EV, Bryant SV: Developmental regulation of a matrix metalloproteinase during regeneration of axolotl appendages. Dev Biol. 1994, 166: 696-703. 10.1006/dbio.1994.1348.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Straube WL, Brockes JP, Drechsel DN, Tanaka EM: Plasticity and reprogramming of differentiated cells in amphibian regeneration: partial purification of a serum factor that triggers cell cycle re-entry in differentiated muscle cells. Cloning Stem Cells. 2004, 6: 333-344. 10.1089/clo.2004.6.333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mashanov VS, Dolmatov IY: Regeneration of digestive tract in the pentactulae of the far-eastern holothurian Eupentacta fraudatrix (Holothuroidea: Dendrochirota). Invert Reprod Dev. 2001, 39: 143-151.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Candia-Carnevali MD, Bonasoro F, Patrono M, Thorndyke MC: Cellular and molecular mechanisms of arm regeneration in crinoid echinoderms: the potencial of arm explants. Dev Genes Evol. 1998, 208: 421-430. 10.1007/s004270050199.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fontes M, Coulon J, Delgrossi MH, Thouveny Y: Muscle dedifferentiation and contractile protein synthesis during post-traumatic regeneration by Owenia fusiformis (polychaete annelid). Cell Differ. 1983, 13: 267-282. 10.1016/0045-6039(83)90037-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cornec JP, Crespo J, Delye P, Hoarau F, Reynaud G: Tissue responses and organogenesis during regeneration in the oligochete Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri (Clap.). Can J Zool. 1987, 65: 403-414.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hay ED: Electron microscopic observations of muscle dedifferentiation in regeneration Amblystoma limbs. Dev Biol. 1959, 1: 555-585. 10.1016/0012-1606(59)90018-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar A, Velloso CP, Imokawa Y, Brockes JP: Plasticity of retrovirus-labelled myotubes in the newt limb regeneration blastema. Dev Biol. 2000, 218: 125-136. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9569.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Echeverri K, Tanaka EM: Mechanisms of muscle dedifferentiation during regeneration. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2002, 13: 353-360. 10.1016/S1084952102000915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davenport RJ: What controls organ regeneration?. Science. 2005, 309: 84-85. 10.1126/science.309.5731.84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nace JD, Tassava RA: Examination of fibronectin distribution and its sources in the regenerating newt limb by immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. Dev Dyn. 1995, 202: 153-164.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gassner KM, Tassava RA: Abnormal limb regeneration in the short-toes mutant of the axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum: studies of age, level of amputation, and extracellular matrix. J Exp Zool. 1997, 279: 571-578. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19971215)279:6<571::AID-JEZ5>3.0.CO;2-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kato T, Miyazadi K, Shimizu-Nishikawa K, Koshiba K, Obara M, Mishima HK, Yoshizato K: Unique expression patterns of matrix metalloproteinases in regenerating newt limbs. Dev Dyn. 2003, 226: 366-376. 10.1002/dvdy.10247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vinarsky V, Atkinson DL, Stevenson TJ, Keating MT, Odelberg SJ: Normal newt limb regeneration requires matrix metalloproteinase function. Dev Biol. 2005, 279: 86-98. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.12.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim TH, Mars WM, Stolz DB, Petersen BE, Michalopoulos GK: Extracellular matrix remodeling at the early stages of liver regeneration in the rat. Hepatol. 1997, 26: 896-904. 10.1002/hep.510260415.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leontovich AA, Zhang J, Shimokawa K, Nagase H, Sarras MP: A novel hydra metalloproteinase (HMMP) functions in extracellular matrix degradation, morphogenesis and the maintenance of differentiated cells in the foot process. Development. 2000, 127: 907-920.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yan L, Leontovich A, Fei K, Sarras MP: Hydra metalloproteinase 1: A secreted astacin metalloproteinase whose apical axis expression is differentially regulated during head regeneration. Dev Biol. 2000, 219: 115-128. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9568.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bai S, Thummel R, Godwin AR, Nagase H, Itoh Y, Li L, Evans R, McDermott J, Seiki M, Sarras MP: Matrix metalloproteinase expression and function during fin regeneration in zebrafish: analysis of MT1-MMP, MMP2 and TIMP2. Matrix Biol. 2005, 24: 247-260. 10.1016/j.matbio.2005.03.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gourevitch D, Clark L, Chen P, Seitz A, Samulewicz SJ, Heber-Katz E: Matrix metalloproteinase activity correlates with blastema formation in the regenerating MRL mouse ear hole model. Dev Dyn. 2003, 226: 377-387. 10.1002/dvdy.10243.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dybas L, Fankboner PV: Holothurian survival strategies: Mechanisms for the maintenance of a bacteriostatic environment in the coelomic cavity of the sea cucumber, Parastichopus californicus. Dev Comp Immunol. 1986, 10: 311-330. 10.1016/0145-305X(86)90022-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hans D, Dubois P, Jangoux M: Defensive mechanisms of holothuroids (Echinodermata): Formation, role, and fate of intracoelomic brown bodies in the sea cucumber Holothuria tubulosa. Cell Tissue Res. 1996, 283: 99-106.Google Scholar
- Pagliara P, Candia Carnevali MD, Burighel P, Ballarin L: The spherule cells of Holothuria polii Delle Chiaie, 1823 (Aspidochirota, Holothuroidea) during brown body formation: an ultrastructural study. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 2003, 35: 295-301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Han M, Yang X, Taylor G, Burdsal CA, Anderson RA, Muneoka K: Limb regeneration in higher vertebrates: developing a roadmap. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005, 287: 14-24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Bekkum DW: Phylogenetic aspects of tissue regeneration: role of stem cells. A concise overview. Blood Cells Mol Disease. 2004, 32: 11-16.Google Scholar
- Galliot B, Miljkovic-Licina M, de Rosa R, Chera S: Hydra, a niche for cell developmental plasticity. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2006, 17: 492-502. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.05.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Presnell JK, Schreibman MP: Humason's Animal Tissue Techniques. 1997, The Johns Hopkins Univ Press, Baltimore, 390: 5Google Scholar
- García-Arrarás JE, Díaz-Miranda L, Torres II, File S, Jiménez L, Rivera-Bermudez K, Arroyo E, Cruz W: Regeneration of the enteric nervous system in the sea cucumber, Holothuria glaberrima selenka (Holothuroidea:Echinodermata). J Exp Zool. 1999, 281: 288-304. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19980701)281:4<288::AID-JEZ5>3.0.CO;2-K.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.