Development, organization, and remodeling of phoronid muscles from embryo to metamorphosis (Lophotrochozoa: Phoronida)
© Temereva and Tsitrin; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 10 February 2013
Accepted: 23 April 2013
Published: 24 April 2013
The phoronid larva, which is called the actinotrocha, is one of the most remarkable planktotrophic larval types among marine invertebrates. Actinotrochs live in plankton for relatively long periods and undergo catastrophic metamorphosis, in which some parts of the larval body are consumed by the juvenile. The development and organization of the muscular system has never been described in detail for actinotrochs and for other stages in the phoronid life cycle.
In Phoronopsis harmeri, muscular elements of the preoral lobe and the collar originate in the mid-gastrula stage from mesodermal cells, which have immigrated from the anterior wall of the archenteron. Muscles of the trunk originate from posterior mesoderm together with the trunk coelom. The organization of the muscular system in phoronid larvae of different species is very complex and consists of 14 groups of muscles. The telotroch constrictor, which holds the telotroch in the larval body during metamorphosis, is described for the first time. This unusual muscle is formed by apical myofilaments of the epidermal cells. Most larval muscles are formed by cells with cross-striated organization of myofibrils. During metamorphosis, most elements of the larval muscular system degenerate, but some of them remain and are integrated into the juvenile musculature.
Early steps of phoronid myogenesis reflect the peculiarities of the actinotroch larva: the muscle of the preoral lobe is the first muscle to appear, and it is important for food capture. The larval muscular system is organized in differently in different phoronid larvae, but always exhibits a complexity that probably results from the long pelagic life, planktotrophy, and catastrophic metamorphosis. Degeneration of the larval muscular system during phoronid metamorphosis occurs in two ways, i.e., by complete or by incomplete destruction of larval muscular elements. The organization and remodeling of the muscular system in phoronids exhibits the combination of protostome-like and deuterostome-like features. This combination, which has also been found in the organization of some other systems in phoronids, can be regarded as an important characteristic and one that probably reflects the basal position of phoronids within the Lophotrochozoa.
The Phoronid a is a phylum of the Bilateria, but the position of phoronids among other bilaterians is still unclear. Although recent molecular data indicate a close relationship between phoronids and typical Spiralia [1, 2] or even as “in-group brachiopods” , this relationship is not yet supported by comparative anatomy and embryology. Although new data on protostomian features in phoronid embryology have recently been published , these results do not allow the definite establishment of phoronids as typical protostomian animals . The obtaining of new and detailed information about phoronid development will help answer questions about the phoronid phylogeny. The study of myogenesis in particular can contribute to phylogenetic analysis because an understanding of myogenesis can clarify some questions of bilaterian phylogeny and reveal homology between some muscle elements in different bilaterian taxa (for details see [6, 7]). In polyplacophorans, for example, the arrangement of muscles is metameric after metamorphosis but is mesh-like before metamorphosis [6, 7]. This suggests the absence of metamery in the common bilaterian ancestor [6, 7].
Phoronid myogenesis has never been studied in detail. Although the mesoderm formation has been traced with light microscopy  and with modern methods of experimental biology [9, 10], the fine structure and location of muscle cells in the early embryo have not been described. All phoronid species have a planktotrophic larva called the actinotrocha, which lives in plankton for 1 to 3 months . Among phoronids, only Phoronis ovalis has a lecithotrophic creeping larva, which does not have tentacles and which undergoes metamorphosis in seven days. According to some data obtained with light and laser confocal microscopy [8, 12–14], the organization of the muscular system in planktotrophic phoronid larvae is very complex. At the same time, the use of transmission and scanning electron microscopy established the location and organization of known muscles in phoronid larvae and also indicated the existence of new muscular elements that may play a main role in larval behavior and metamorphosis .
Adult phoronids have a unique body plan that forms during catastrophic metamorphosis. The general view is that during the metamorphosis of phoronid larvae into adults, most larval systems including the muscular system are lost and definitive organs form de novo. This view, however, was not consistent with our observations [15, 16]. These studies point out several differences in the ontogenetic patterns of muscle development, but the potential plasticity of these patterns including the overall larval myoanatomy of phoronid larvae remains largely unknown. Therefore, the current study investigates myogenesis, the organization of the larval muscular system and its fate during the metamorphosis of Phoronopsis harmeri.
In the young actinotrocha, which has a complete intestine and begins to feed, the muscular system is stronger than in earlier stages. The body of the young larva is divided into a large preoral lobe and a collar, which has a spacious oral field on the ventral side (Figure 2C). The collar is the body part between the preoral lobe and the tentacular ridge, which bears latero-frontal cilia and extends along the lateral and ventral sides of the collar region (Figure 2C). At this stage, the preoral lobe of the larva has a well-developed muscular system (Figure 2D, E). It consists of one annular muscle, 20–22 thick radial muscles, and nine thin transverse muscles. The annular muscle is composed of sveral circular muscle fibers (Figure 2G); it forms two short branches, which continue from the preoral lobe to the ventrolateral sides of the oral field (Figure 2D). Radial muscles extend along the upper wall of the preoral lobe, whereas the transverse muscles lie on the lower wall of the preoral lobe. In each radial muscle, the distal portion of the cell, which contacts the annular muscle, is wide and contains a large nucleus (Figure 2F,G). Here, myofilamets are grouped in two, three, or four bundles (Figure 2F). The proximal portion of the radial muscle is thin and ends on the dorsal side of the preoral lobe (Figure 2E). The 3–4 most distal transverse muscles, which are situated near the edge of the preoral lobe, start and end in the annular muscle, whereas the proximal muscles that are located near the mouth form circles. Most of the proximal transverse muscles form the circular musculature of the mouth and the esophagus (Figure 2H). In the transverse muscle cells, the nucleus mainly occupies the central part. The muscular system of the collar region is represented by 8–10 transverse muscles, which are strong on the ventral side and weak on the lateral sides. These transverse muscles of the collar are located repetitively from the mouth to the tentacular ridge (Figure 2D).
In the 9-day-old larva, one pair of primordial tentacles develops (Figure 3D). The collar ring muscle appears as a result of fusion of several transverse muscles of the collar. Short radial muscles extend from the collar ring muscle into each tentacle (Figure 3D). With age, the number of tentacles increases; in the 11-day-old larva, tentacle elevators originate in each tentacle and pass from the base to the terminal end of the tentacle (Figure 3E).
In the 9-day-old larva, the hood depressor precursors appear. These paired muscles pass from the esophagus along the lateral side of the collar region to the collar ring muscle (Figure 3D). In later stages, the hood depressors become more evident.
In the 15-day-old larva, each hood depressor forms several long branches near the collar ring muscle (Figure 3F). The anterior end of each depressor grows from the esophagus to the basal lamina of the apical plate (Figure 3G). The hood depressors connect the apical pole of the larva and the collar ring muscle. When passing near the esophagus, the hood depressors contact the strong esophageal muscular system, which consists of several thick circular muscles (Figure 3H). The esophageal muscle cells form processes, which pass posteriorly and contact to the dorsal parts of the collar ring muscle (Figure 3H). In the 15-day-old larva, the trunk forms as a short body part under the tentacle ridge, and its muscular system begins to become evident (Figure 3F). Two groups of muscles appear simultaneously: the telotroch flexors and the trunk retractors (Figure 3I). The telotroch flexors are represented by two pairs of muscles, which pass from the telotroch base to the collar ring muscle. Trunk retractors are two curled, thin muscles attached to the epidermis near the anus and to the collar ring muscle (Figure 3I).
Organization of the muscular system in advanced larvae
Additional file 1: The metamorphosis of a Phoronopsis harmeri larva. This time-lapse movie shows a typical sequence of phoronid metamorphosis, which starts with the great contraction of the hood depressors and trunk retractors and eversion of the metasomal sack. (MP4 10 MB)
The esophageal musculature is composed of numerous muscle cells, which pass around the esophagus and form a continuous layer (Figure 6C). The muscle cells form numerous basal processes (Figure 6D); they do not bear desmosomes, and they contact each other via thick electron-dense collagenous fibers that pass around the esophagus (Figure 6E).
The collar ring muscle gives rise to the tentacle elevators, which begin as two branches at the base and continue as thick muscular bands along the frontal (upper) side of each tentacle (Figure 8C). Each tentacle elevator consists of two parts: the base and the terminal bulge. The muscle cells that form the base of the tentacle elevator are squeezed between the epidermis and the cells of the tentacular coelomic lining (Figure 8I). The terminal bulge of the tentacle elevator extends into the tentacular blood vessel (Figure 8G). Cross sections reveal that the base of the tentacle elevator is formed by 4–5 muscle cells and that the terminal bulge is formed by and 7–8 cells (Figure 8G). All of the muscle cells are in close contact but desmosomes between them were not found (Figure 6I). In the advanced larva, numerous muscle fibers occur along the abfrontal (lower) and lateral sides of the tentacle (Figures 4C,D). These are tentacle depressors, which are formed by cells of the coelomic lining of the tentacular coelom. These muscles are very weak, but they can be recognized with phalloidin staining (Figure 4F).
The telotroch flexors (Figures 4H) are formed by the cell of the metacoel lining. These muscles are composed of long projections of muscle cells; the projections overlay each other, are connected via desmosomes, and contact the basal lamina via hemidesmosomes (Figure 9F). The myofibrils are organized as they are in smooth musculature.
The telotroch constrictor is formed by epidermal cells, which are located above the telotroch. The myofibers are grouped in parietal bundles and extend into the apical cytoplasm of these cells (Figure 9G). The myofibrils exhibit a cross-striated-like organization (Figure 9G).
Myogenesis and organization of muscles in advanced larva
In all phoronid species studied to date, the first muscle cells arise from cells that immigrated from the anterior wall of the archenteron of the embryo at the mid-gastrula stage ([10, 13, 19, 20], therein). Muscle cells arising from this anterior source give rise to the muscles of the preoral lobe, the collar region, and the tentacles (, therein). They also give rise to the coelomic lining of the preoral and tentacular coeloms of P. harmeri. The preoral coelom originates simultaneously with musculature of the preoral lobe, but cells of the protocoel lining do not have myofibers  and can not be traced with phalloidin labelling. The tentacular coelom originates in young P. harmeri larva, which has two pairs of tentacles. The trunk coelom and musculature including the telotroch flexors and trunk retractors develop in P. harmeri larva later and arise from the pouch in the posterior part of the archenteron, which forms during embryogenesis in several phoronid species [19, 20]. The anterior and posterior sources of of the mesoderm are located on the border between the ectoderm and endoderm, which confirms the view that these sites have a main role in mesoderm formation .
In phoronid development, the muscles first arise in the preoral lobe ([13, 21], herein). According to TEM data , Phoronis muelleri larva also has muscular cells in the preoral lobe. These cells apparently show an apicobasal polarity, but are never connected each other by apical adherens junctions and do not form true epithelium . The arrangement of circular and radial muscles in the preoral lobe is the same in all phoronid larvae studied to date ([10, 12–14, 21], herein). The musculature of the preoral lobe allows larvae to create movements that generate suction in the absence of hood elevators. These movements are very important for the capture of food particles and have been described in advanced larvae of different phoronid species [22, 23]. The use of musculature for the capture of food particles or for the transport of food particles to the mouth is unknown for other planktotrophic larvae, which usually capture food particles via a ciliary mechanism.
Simultaneous with the development of the preoral lobe musculature, the esophageal musculature arises. The esophageal musculature has a very complex organization and the muscular activity of the esophagus is under nerve control, which is mediated by the net of nerve fibres and some perikarya around the esophagus [24, 25]. In planktotrophic larvae of marine invertebrates, the esophageal musculature develops first, becomes strong with age, and in advanced larvae, the esophagus has its own innervations via a net of perikarya and neurites that develops around the esophagus [26–32].
Previous reports have mentioned the formation of transversal muscles of the collar in all young phoronid larvae that have been studied ([10, 13], and ref. therein). The collar musculature consists of numerous paired muscles, which arrange repetitively along the oral field of the larva . The thick musculature of the oral field is innervated by numerous neurites and perikarya, which are scattered in the oral field epidermis . The abundance of the muscular and the nervous elements in the oral field is likely related to the functional significance of this body part, which is involved in the transport of food particles from the tentacles to the mouth [22, 23].
The next step of myogenesis is the formation of the collar ring muscle. It’s appearance connects with formation of primordial of the tentacles, which develop as outgrowths of the oral field. The collar ring muscle is present in some phoronid larvae and absent in other. Thus, in larvae of P. harmeri and P. pallida, the collar ring muscle appears in young larvae and remains the most prominent muscle during larval development ([12, 13], herein). In competent actinotrocha C, actinotrocha D, and Phoronis architecta larvae, the collar ring muscle is not evident . Interestingly, in the case of P. ijimai, the collar ring muscle is absent in young larvae until stage with six tentacle [10, 33], but is present in competent larva [own data]. Moreover, in young P. ijimai larvae, tentacle elevators are also absent. At the same time, hood depressors in these larvae form long posterior branches that penetrate into the tentacles and probably fill the functions of tentacle elevators [10, 33].
The collar ring muscle functions as an anchor for the hood depressors and trunk retractors and gives rise to the tentacle elevators . Hood depressors were described in P. harmeri larvae only [8, herein], although they can be observed in actinotrocha D  and in larvae of P. pallida and P. ijimai[10, 34].
The last event in myogenesis is the formation of the trunk musculature. The telotroch flexors and trunk retractors originate simultaneously. Although the telotroch flexors have been mentioned in all phoronid larvae studied to date (herein, [10, 11]), in one report , these muscles are referred to as trunk retractors and in another paper , these muscles are not evident at all. In general, the telotroch flexors are well developed in small phoronid larvae (like the larvae of P. ijimai and P. pallida), which swim actively by using their strong telotroch, in contrast to large phoronid larvae (like the larvae of P. harmeri), which float in the water and usually do not swim quickly .
Using light microscopy, Zimmer was the first to describe the trunk retractors in P. harmeri larvae . Our results, which were obtained with cytochemistry and TEM, confirm and amplify Zimmer’s data. The trunk retractors are very important for the formation of new body plan in the juvenile (see below). According to literature , larvae of P. pallida lack distinct trunk retractors and other muscles provide the formation of new body plan.
The telotroch constrictor is described here for the first time. This muscle has an unusual organization and is formed by epidermal cells with apical myofilaments. Phoronid larvae have myoepithelial cells in the epidermis of different body parts. Thus, myoepithelial cells have been found in the epidermis of the esophagus , the apical organ, the preoral ciliated band, and the oral field . Myoepithelial cells also occur in the epidermis of larvae of other invertebrates; for example, in the apical organ  and in the epidermis of prototrochs  of pelagic larvae of some entoprocts.
Our data shows that there is a difference in development and organization of the muscular system in larvae of different phoronid species. This difference was assumed before  and, probably, corresponds to the type of larva .
The presence of muscles in larvae of two phoronid species and the fate of these muscles during metamorphosis
Found in larva / Fate in metamorphosis
Phoronopsis harmeri(this paper)
1. Annular muscle of the hood
+ but lost in the first minutes
+ and then lost
2. Radial and circular muscles of the hood
+ but lost in the first minutes
+ and then lost
3. Hood depressors
+, retained for 15 minutes, and then lost
+ (referred to as “hood elevators”) and then lost
4. Hood elevators
+ and then lost
+ (are not shown) and then lost
5. Esophageal musculature
+ and then incorporated in the juvenile body
+ / ?
6. Transverse muscles of collar
+ and then lost
+ and then lost
7. Collar ring muscle
+ but lost in 10 minutes
+ and then lost
8. Tentacle elevators
+ and then incorporated in the juvenile body
+ and then lost
9. Tentacle depressors
+ and then lost
+ and then lost
10. Trunk body musculature including muscles of the blood vessels
+ and then incorporated in the juvenile body
+ (dorsal blood vessel of larva referred to as “dorsal retractor”) and then lost
11. Trunk retractors
+ , retained for 15 minutes, and then lost
12. Telotroch flexors
+ and then lost
+ and then lost
13. Telotroch constrictor
+, retained for 9 days, and then lost
14. Metasomal sack musculature
+ and then gives rise to the musculature of the juvenile trunk body wall
? / ?
In phoronids, the formation of a new body plan connects with enormous outgrowth of the ventral side and the shortening of the dorsal side of the larva. In P. harmeri, there are some muscles, which are definitely important for formation of a new body plan: the hood depressors, the trunk retractors, and the telotroch constrictor. All these muscles can be observed at the later stages of metamorphosis when most of other muscles are destroyed. Muscles of the first two groups are the most important for the formation of the juvenile body plan because they bring together the anterior and posterior ends of the larva and thereby reduce larval body length. The work of both the anterior (hood) and posterior (trunk) muscles are important. The hood depressors pull on the esophagus so that it assumes its definitive straight position. With contraction of the posterior (trunk) retractors, the dorsal side of the larva gradually shortens.
Larvae of P. pallida lack distinct trunk retractors have two retractor muscles that insert at the midpoint of the gut and are involved in movements of the gut during metamorphosis . The “dorsal retractor”, which was found in P. pallida larvae, is also involved into metamorphosis and helps to bend the larva at its dorsal midpoint . In P. harmeri we did not find any special retractors of the metasomal sack. The metasomal sack and the gut are joined with the ventral mesentery, which gives rise to the oral–anal mesentery of the juvenile [18, 39]. Because of the connection, the digestive tract pulls into the metasomal sack when it everts during the first minute of metamorphosis. The “dorsal retractor” evidently corresponds to dorsal blood vessel, which has mostly circular muscles  and can not be involved into bending of the larva.
The telotroch constrictor is important for reorganization of the posterior part of the larva. After the trunk retractors contract, the telotroch is pulled into the larval body, and the contraction of telotroch constrictor locks the telotroch within (Additional file 1). The telotroch remains in this position for 9 days, during which time the epidermis of the telotroch disintegrates into cellular debris .
In P. harmeri, the esophageal musculature is retained during metamorphosis and provides swallowing movements when some parts of larval body are consumed by the juvenile.
According to literature , the degeneration of tentacle depressors and elevator means that the newly formed juvenile cannot perform muscular movement of its tentacles (tentacular flicks). In P. harmeri, metamorphosis occurs in another way and the basal parts of each tentacle elevator remain during metamorphosis and integrate into the mesocoel lining. Because of this integration, P. harmeri retains the ability to perform muscular movement of its tentacles at all stages of metamorphosis. The integration of cross-striated larval muscles into the juvenile musculature is indicated by some cytological evidence. In juvenile and adult phoronids, in each tentacle, a strong longitudinal cross-striated muscle passes along the frontal side [40–42]. The location and fine structure of this muscle corresponds to the position and fine organization of the larval tentacle elevator.
On the other hand, remodeling of the tentacle muscular system in phoronids seems strange because larval and definitive tentacles have the same function and their muscles make similar movements. Thus, the contraction of the larval tentacle elevator lifts the larval tentacle. In adults, the contraction of the frontal longitudinal muscle of the tentacle bends the tentacle and produces a “flick”-like movement, which is important for the capture of food particles . The remodeling of the tentacle muscular system in phoronids probably corresponds with the special respiratory function of the adult tentacle .
The lining of the larval digestive tract is inherited by the juvenile and retains its muscular organization in the adult. In adult P. harmeri, the lining of digestive tract consists of myoepithelial cells with longitudinal myofibres; circular muscles are absent, and basal projections of the stomach epithelium, which contain circular myofibers, function as a circular musculature . The juvenile inherits blood vessels, which are built in the larva. The dorsal blood vessel of the larva gives rise to the median blood vessel of the adult. The “dorsal retractor”, which is mentioned in Santagata’s article , might correspond to the dorsal blood vessel, which has thick muscular walls and can be observed with phalloidin staining.
Organization of the muscular system in phoronid larvae and other ciliated larvae of marine invertebrates
The organization of the larval muscular system mostly depends on larval life style; therefore, it is usually very difficult to establish the homology between muscular elements in larvae of different animals . In ciliated larvae, the most important organs generally have their own musculature, and these muscle elements are innervated by prominent nerve tracts. The most prominent organs of marine pelagic ciliated larvae are ciliated bands. Ciliated bands contain sensory cells that pass excitation to the intraepidermal neurites, which then stimulate the muscles. Thus, in P. harmeri larvae, all ciliated bands (preoral, postoral, and telotroch) are controlled by thick muscles (annular hood muscle, circular collar muscle, and telotroch constrictor muscle), which are innervated by well-developed nerve tracks (marginal nerve of the preoral lobe, tentacular neurite bundle, and telotroch nerve rings) . This co-localization is most evident in ciliated bands, the esophagus, and the apical organ. The same co-localization (overlapping) of muscles and nerve tracts is known in marine larvae of nemerteans , bryozoans [45–47], annelids [29, 48], echinoderms , hemichordates , brachiopods , and many other invertebrates. Pelagic larvae of marine invertebrates usually have a well-developed apical organ, which can be withdrawn into the larval body via contraction of the apical muscle. This muscle, which extends between apical plate and body wall or wall of the digestive tract, occurs in tornaria (: Figure 4), bryozoan larvae [46, 52], entoproct larvae , and nemertean larvae . If the larva is threatened, the contraction of this muscle pulls the apical organ into the larval body. Phoronid larvae also have special muscles—the hood depressors—that pull the apical organ into the larva and protect it.
Concerning the fine structure of larval muscle cells, the difference in the ultrastructure of muscle cells in lophotrochozoan and deuterostomian larvae is important. Usually, lophotrochozoan larvae have cross-striated muscles, whereas deuterostomian larvae have only smooth muscles [54–56]. Although some data indicate that some larval and juvenile musculature appears to be obliquely striated with discontinuous z-bands , we did not find this type of muscle organization in P. harmeri larvae. According to our results, phoronid larvae have both cross-striated and smooth muscles. Those muscles that originate from an anterior mesoderm are usually cross-striated, whereas those muscles that originate from a posterior mesoderm are usually smooth. These data do not definitely indicate a protostomian affiliation for phoronids but probably support that phoronids combine some deuterostome-like and protostome-like features .
Remarks on phylogeny
Although previous researchers have attempted to establish the homology between different muscles in different Bilateria , doing so is in most cases very difficult because the organization of the muscular system usually depends on the peculiarities of biology and life style. For example, a comparative analysis of musculature in phoronids and brachiopods was unsuccessful . In any case, comprehensive information about the development and organization of the muscular system may help in future analysis.
Comparative analysis is complicated by the remodeling of the muscular system that occurs during bilaterian metamorphosis. Among phoronids, two main patterns of muscular system remodeling are evident during metamorphosis: complete and incomplete destruction of larval muscular elements. In Phoronopsis harmeri, some muscular elements of the larva integrate into the juvenile musculature, whereas in Phoronis pallida, the larval musculature is completely destroyed as the larva develops into the juvenile. This difference may reflect the phylogenetic status of the genus Phoronopsis, whose members exhibit more plesiomorphic conditions than those in the genus Phoronis. The plesiomorphic nature of Phoronopsis together with its retention of larval tentacular musculature and its direct transformation of larval tentacles into juvenile tentacles suggests that the presence of tentacles is a primary phoronid characteristic, i.e., the phoronid ancestor had tentacles at larval and adult stages. In that case, the absence of tentacles in P. ovalis larvae can be regarded as a derived condition. Moreover, because recent research indicates that phoronids are nested with brachipods  and because some brachiopods have planktotrophic larvae with tentacles, we suggest that common brachiozoan ancestor had tentacles that were used to feed. Therefore, the presence of planktotrochic larvae may be regarded as primary condition of brachiopods. This statement has some support from paleontological data , although the primacy of planktotrophy vs. lecithotrophy in bilaterian phylogeny generally remains unclear .
Interestingly, brachiopods also exhibit two types of metamorphosis: in the lecitotrophic larvae of some rhynchonelliform (articulate) brachiopods  and Novocrania anomala, the larval musculature is destroyed and juvenile muscles appear de novo. The planktotrophic larvae of Glottidia and Lingula, in contrast, retain the larval musculature during metamorphosis . Both phoronid larvae and brachiopod planktotrophic larvae undergo some changes in their lophophoral musculature, which correlate with a switch from swimming and feeding in the plankton to burrowing and feeding in the benthos. Despite these changes, both phoronids and brachiopods exhibit specific peculiarities in filter-feeding mechanisms, which can be observed in both larval and adult stages . Strathmann  described the combination of some protostome-like and deuterostome-like features in the organization of ciliated bands and filter-feeding mechanisms in phoronids and brachiopods.
The combination of protostome-like and deuterostome-like features in phoronids described previously [5, 25, 39] and in this report probably reflects the basal position of brachiopods and phoronids within the Lophotrochozoa, as discussed by Peterson and Eernisse . The view that brachiopods and phoronids occupy a basal position within the Lophotrochozoa contradicts recent molecular data [1, 2] but must be examined comprehensively with different modern methods.
This report is the first detailed report about the development and organization of the muscular system in phoronids from fertilization through metamorphosis to juvenile. The first muscle cells originate from the anterior mesoderm and occupy the anterior portion of the embryo. The muscle of the preoral lobe is the first muscle to appear, and it plays a main role in food capture. Two ventrolateral muscles and transverse repetitive muscles then appear on the ventral side of the collar. The organization of the muscular system in competent phoronid larvae is very complex and at least 14 groups of muscles are evident. During metamorphosis, most larval muscles degenerate and turn into huge globular conglomerates. The hood depressors and trunk retractors remain trough the metamorphosis and play important role in formation of juvenile body plan, because these muscles tie together anterior and posterior parts of larval body. Some larval muscle elements, such as the tentacle elevators and, esophageal musculature, and metacoel lining are inherited by the juvenile. Our results and literature data allow to conclude that among phoronids, two main patterns of muscular system remodeling during metamorphosis: complete and incomplete destruction of larval muscular elements.
The muscular system of phoronid larvae is generally more complex than that of the ciliated larvae of other marine invertebrates. This complexity reflects the long active life of phoronid larvae in the plankton, planktotrophy, and catastrophic metamorphosis, the latter of which is mediated by specialized muscles. Some organs (the apical organ, the ciliated bands, the esophagus) are supported by similar muscle elements in the larvae of different invertebrates.
The fine organization of phoronid muscles combines protostome-like and deuterostome-like features. This combination, which has also been found in the organization of some other systems in phoronids, can be regarded as an important characteristic and one that probably reflects the basal position of phoronids within the Lophotrochozoa.
The myogenesis, organization of larval muscular system and its metamorphic remodeling were studied in Phoronopsis harmeri Pixel, 1912.
For myogenesis studying, adult Phoronopsis harmeri were collected from May to June 2010 in Coos Bay, Oregon, USA, from intertidal sandy sediments. Fertilized eggs, which were extracted from reproductive females by opening the trunk, were kept in glass beakers containing filtered sea water; the temperature of the egg suspension was maintained at 3-14°С by keeping the beaker partially submerged in running sea water on a laboratory bench. Under these conditions, embryos developed normally. Within 15 min of exposure to sea water, two polar bodies were formed and cleavage commenced. Stages of development were monitored with a stereo microscope. Larval cultures had a density of two larvae per 3–4 ml filtered sea water. Larvae were fed mixtures of Rhodomonas lens and Chaetoceros calcitrans and 75% of the sea water was changed every 2 days. At 4 h intervals (up to the 24-day-old larva), specimens were prepared for future investigations (see below).
For larvae and metamorphosis studies, competent larvae of P. harmeri were collected with a planktonic net during November of 2011 in Vostok Bay, Sea of Japan. Larvae were reared at 13 to 14C in an incubator with a 12-h light–dark cycle until metamorphosis. At 2–3 min intervals (up to the newly formed juvenile), specimens were prepared for future investigations (see below).
Live embryos were photographed using a Leica DFC 400 camera mounted on an Olympus BX51 microscope. Competent larvae, metamorphic stages, newly formed juveniles, and 4-day-old juveniles were photographed using a Panasonic DMC-TZ10 digital camera mounted on a binocular light microscope. All these stages were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), cytochemistry, and confocal laserscanning microscopy (CLSM).
For SEM, fixed competent larvae and metamorphic stages of P. harmeri that had been dehydrated in ethanol followed by an acetone series were critical point dried and then sputter coated with platinum-palladium alloy. Before coating, some larvae were dissected for study of muscles fine morphology. Specimens were examined with a CamScan S2 scanning electron microscope.
For TEM, early embryos, competent larvae, and metamorphic stages of P. harmeri were fixed at 4°C in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.05 M cacodylate buffer containing 21 mg/ml NaCl and then postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide in the same buffer containing 23 mg/ml NaCl. Postfixation was followed by en bloc staining for 2 h in a 1% solution of uranyl acetate in distilled water. Specimens were then dehydrated in ethanol followed by an acetone series and embedded in Spurr resin (Sigma Aldrich). Semi-thin and thin sections were cut with a Reichert Ultracut E ultratome. Semi-thin sections were stained with methylene blue, observed with Zeiss Axioplan2 microscope and photographed with an AxioCam HRm camera. Thin sections were stained with lead citrate and then examined with a JEOL JEM 100B electron microscope.
For cytochemistry, embryos, advanced and competent larvae of P. harmeri, newly formed juveniles, and 4-day-old juveniles were narcotised in MgCl2, then fixed for 60 min in a 4 % paraformaldehyde solution on a filtrate of sea water and washed (two times) in phosphatic buffer (pH 7.4) (Fisher Scientific) with Triton X-100 (0.1%) (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and 0.1% albumine bovine (PBT/BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for a total of 20 min. Then, the specimens were washed in PBT/BSA and incubated in a mixture of rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (1:50) (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and Hoechst (1:1000) (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) for 1 h at RT in the dark. In the following, they were washed in PBS (three times × 15 min), mounted on a cover glass covered with poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and embedded in Murray Clear or Vectashield (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA). Embryos and early larvae were viewed with an Olympus confocal microscope (OIMB, OR, USA). Competent larvae, metamorphic stages, and newly formed juveniles were viewed with an Olympus confocal microscope (Institute of Developmental Biology, Moscow, Russia). Advanced larva of P. harmeri was viewed with a Biorad MRC-600 series confocal microscope (Friday Harbour Labs). Z-projections were generated using the programme Image J version 1.43. Three-dimensional reconstructions were generated using Amira version 5.2.2 software (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland).
In this report, we have used the terms suggested by Russel Zimmer (1964), who made the most complete description of muscular system of phoronid larvae using methods of light microscopy. We also used some terms that were suggested by Scott Santagata (2004).
This research was supported in part by grants to ENT from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (# 11-04-00690; # 12-04-33045) and Grant of the President of Russia (# MD- 1979.2013.4). The work was performed at User Facilities Center of M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University under financial support of Ministry of Education and Science of Russian federation. ENT is very grateful to her fiend Svetlana Maslakova for hosting her at the Oregon Institute of Marine Biology in 2010 and for providing resources and training, especially in immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy. ENT is grateful to Thomas Schwaha (Vienna University) and Stephan Handschuh (Vienna University) for helping her with the Amira program. ENT would also like to thank Leo Rusin (Moscow State University) for his help with movies. Authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers, whose comments helped to improve the paper. We thank B. Jaffee for help with the English language.
- Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW, Edgecombe GD, Martinez P, Baguñà J, Bailly X, Jondelius U, Wiens M, Müller WEG, Seaver E, Wheeler WC, Martindale MQ, Giribet G, Dunn CW: Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc Biol Sci. 2009, 276: 4261-4270. 10.1098/rspb.2009.0896.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paps J, Baguñà J, Riutort M: Bilaterian Phylogeny: a broad sampling of 13 nuclear genes provides a new Lophotrochozoa phylogeny and supports a paraphyletic basal acoelomorpha. Mol Biol Evol. 2009, 26 (10): 2397-2406. 10.1093/molbev/msp150.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen B, Weydmann A: Molecular evidence that phoronids are a subtaxon of brachiopods (Brachiopoda: Phoronata) and that genetic divergence of metazoan phyla began long before the early Cambrian. Organisms, Divers Evol. 2005, 5: 253-273. 10.1016/j.ode.2004.12.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pennerstorfer M, Scholtz G: Early cleavage in Phoronis muelleri (Phoronida) displays spiral features. Evol Dev. 2012, 14 (6): 484-500. 10.1111/ede.12002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: Embryogenesis in phoronids. Invert Zool. 2012, 9 (1): 1-39.Google Scholar
- Wanninger A, Haszprunar G: Chiton myogenesis: perspectives for the development and evolution of larval and adult muscle systems in mollusks. J Morphol. 2002, 251: 103-113. 10.1002/jmor.1077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wanninger A: Shaping the things to come: ontogeny of lophotrochozoan neuromuscular systems and the Tetraneuralia concept. Biol Bull. 2009, 216: 293-306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zimmer RL: Reproductive biology and development of Phoronida. 1964, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: University Microfilms, Inc, 416-Google Scholar
- Freeman G: The bases and timing of regional specification during larval development in Phoronis. Dev Biol. 1991, 147: 157-173. 10.1016/S0012-1606(05)80015-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freeman G, Martindale MQ: The origin of mesoderm in Phoronids. Dev Biol. 2002, 252: 301-311. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0854.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN: New data on distribution, morphology and taxonomy of phoronid larvae (Phoronida, Lophophorata). Invert Zool. 2009, 6 (1): 47-64.Google Scholar
- Santagata S: Structure and metamorphic remodeling of the larval nervous system and musculature of Phoronis pallida (Phoronida). Evol Dev. 2002, 4: 28-42. 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2002.01055.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Santagata S: Larval development of Phoronis pallida (Phoronida): implications for morphological convergence and divergence among larval body plans. J Morphol. 2004, 259: 347-358. 10.1002/jmor.10205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Santagata S, Zimmer RL: Comparison of the neuromuscular systems among actinotroch larvae: systematic and evolutionary implications. Evol Dev. 2002, 4: 43-54. 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2002.01056.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Tsitrin EB: Phoronid muscular system: development, anatomy and ultrastructure in larvae, and the fate in the metamorphosis. Proceedings of the Xth International Larval Biology Symposium: July 30–3. 2012, Berkeley, California, USA: University of Berkeley, 47-48. AugustGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Tsitrin EB: Metamorphosis of Phoronopsis harmeri. Proceedings of the Xth International Larval Biology Symposium: July 30–3. 2012, Berkeley, California, USA: University of Berkeley, 66-67. AugustGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: The circulatory system of phoronid larvae. Doklady Biol Sci. 2000, 375 (5): 712-714.Google Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: The answer to Thomas Bartolomaeus: “Larva of phoronid Phoronopsis harmeri Pixell, 1912 has trimeric coelom organization”. Invert Zool. 2006, 2 (2): 394-402.Google Scholar
- Malakhov VV, Temereva EN: Embryonic development of the phoronid Phoronis ijimai (Lophophorata, Phoronida): two sources of the coelomic mesoderm. Doklady Biol Sci. 1999, 365 (4): 166-168.Google Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: Embryogenesis and larval development of Phoronopsis harmeri Pixell, 1912 (Phoronida): dual origin of the coelomic mesoderm. Invert Reprod Dev. 2007, 50: 57-66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bartolomaeus T: Ultrastructure and formation of the body cavity lining in Phoronis muelleri (Phoronida, Lophophorata). Zoomorph. 2001, 120 (3): 135-148. 10.1007/s004350000030.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Strathmann RR, Bone Q: Ciliary feeding assisted by suction from the muscular oral hood of phoronid larvae. Biol Bull. 1997, 193: 153-162. 10.2307/1542761.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riisgård HU: Methods of ciliary filter feeding in adult Phoronis muelleri (phylum Phoronida) and its free-swimming actinotroch larva. Mar Biol. 2002, 141: 75-87. 10.1007/s00227-002-0802-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN: The digestive tract of actinotroch larvae (Lophotrochozoa, Phoronida): anatomy, ultrastructure, innervations, and some observations of metamorphosis. Can J Zool. 2010, 88 (2): 1149-1168.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temereva E, Wanninger A: Development of the nervous system in Phoronopsis harmeri (Lophotrochozoa, Phoronida) reveals both deuterostome- and trochozoan-like features. BMC Evol Biol. 2012, 12: 12-10.1186/1471-2148-12-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burke RD: Structure of the digestive tract of the pluteus larva of Dendraster excentricus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Zoomorphology. 1981, 98 (3): 209-225. 101007/BF00312050.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lacalli TC: Structure and organization of the nervous system in the trochophore larva of Spirobranchus. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1984, 306: 76-135.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dautov SS, Nezlin LP, Yushin VV: Structure of the digestive tract of tornaria larva in Enteropneusta (Hemichordata). Helgol Mar Res. 1994, 48: 107-121.Google Scholar
- McDougall C, Chen W-C, Shimeld SM, Ferrier D: The development of the larval nervous system, musculature and ciliary bands of Pomatoceros lamarckii (Annelida): heterochrony in polychaetes. Front Zool. 2006, 3: 16-10.1186/1742-9994-3-16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altenburger A, Wanninger A: Comparative larval myogenesis and adult myoanatomy in the rhynchonelliform (articulate) brachiopods Argyrotheca cordata, A cistellula, and Terebratalia transversa. Front Zool. 2009, 6: 3-10.1186/1742-9994-6-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miguchi Y, Takata H, Doihara T, Miyawaki K, Shimikawa T, Hamada F, Kobayashi N, Matsuda S: Morphological maturation level of the esophagus is associated with the number of circumesophageal muscle fibers during archenteron formation in the starfish Patiria (Asterina) pectinifera. Biol Bull. 2010, 219: 12-16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nezlin LP, Yushin VV: Structure of the nervous system in the tornaria larva of Balanoglossus proterogonius (Hemichordata: Enteropneusta) and its phylogenetic implications. Zoomorphology. 2004, 123 (1): 1-13. 10.1007/s00435-003-0086-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maslakova SA: Invertebrate embryology: Actinotroch of Phoronis vancouverensis. 2010, http://invert-embryoblogspotcom/2010_05_01_archive.htm,Google Scholar
- Sensenbaugh T: Ultrastructural observations on the larva of Loxosoma pectinaricola Franzén (Entoprocta, Loxosomatidae). Acta Zool. 1987, 68: 135-145. 10.1111/j.1463-6395.1987.tb00884.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haszprunar G, Wanninger A: On the fine structure of the creeping larva of Loxosomella murmanica: additional evidence for a clade of Kamptozoa (Entoprocta) and Mollusca. Acta Zool. 2008, 89: 137-148.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kovalevsky АО: Anatomy and Life History of Phoronis. Proc St.-Petersburg Acad Sci. 1867, 2: 1-35.Google Scholar
- Herrmann K: Larvalentwicklung und Metamorphose von Phoronis psammophila (phoronida, Tentaculata). Helgol Wiss Meeresuntersuch. 1979, 32: 550-581. 10.1007/BF02277994.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Siewing R: orphologische Untersuchungen zum Archicoelomatenproblem. The body segmentation in Phoronis muelleri de Selys-Longchamps (Phoronidea) Ontogenese – Larve – Metamorphose – Adultus. Zool Jahrb Anat. 1974, 92 (2): 275-318.Google Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: The evidence of metamery in adult brachiopods and phoronids. Invert Zool. 2011, 8 (2): 91-112.Google Scholar
- Pardos F, Roldan C, Benito J, Emig CC: Fine structure of the tentacles of Phoronis australis. Acta Zool. 1991, 72 (2): 81-90. 10.1111/j.1463-6395.1991.tb00320.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pardos F, Roldan C, Benito J, Aguirre FI: Ultrastructure of the lophophoral tentacles in the genus Phoronis (Phoronida, Lophophorata). Can J Zool. 1993, 71: 205-262.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV, Yushin VV: Histology and ultrastructure of the body wall in the phoronid Phoronopsis harmeri. Russ J Mar Biol. 2001, 27 (3): 156-167. 10.1023/A:1016765418546.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: The intestine of phoronids has epitheliomusculer cells. Doklady Biol Sci. 2002, 386 (4): 469-471.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maslakova SA: Development to metamorphosis of the nemertean pilidium larva. Front Zool. 2010, 7: 30-10.1186/1742-9994-7-30.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Santagata S: The morphology and evolutionary significance of the ciliary fields and musculature among marine bryozoan larvae. J Morphol. 2008, 269: 349-364. 10.1002/jmor.10592.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gruhl A: Muscular systems in gymnolaemate bryozoans larvae (Bryozoa: Gymnolaemata). Zoomorphology. 2008, 127: 143-159. 10.1007/s00435-008-0059-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen C, Worsaae K: Structure and occurrence of cyphonautes larvae (Bryozoa, Ectoprocta). J Morphol. 2010, 271 (9): 1094-1109. 10.1002/jmor.10856.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smart T, von Dasssow G: Unusual development of the mitraria larva in the Polychaete Owenia collaris. Biol Bull. 2009, 217: 253-268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murabe N, Hatoyama H, Hase S, Komatsu MK, Burke RD, Kaneko H, Nakajima Y: Neural architecture of the brachiolaria larva of the starfish, Asterina pectinifera. J Comp Neurol. 2008, 509: 271-282. 10.1002/cne.21742.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen C, Hay-Schmidt A: Development of the enteropneust Ptychodera flava: ciliary bands and nervous system. J Morphol. 2007, 268: 551-570. 10.1002/jmor.10533.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Santagata S: Evaluating neurophylogenetic patterns in the larval nervous systems of brachiopods and their evolutionary significance to other bilaterian phyla. J Morphol. 2011, 272: 1153-1169. 10.1002/jmor.10975.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gruhl A: Neuromuscular system of the larva of Fredericella sultana (Bryozoa: Phylactolaemata). Zool Anz. 2010, 249: 139-149. 10.1016/j.jcz.2010.06.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Borisanova AO, Chernyshev AV, Malakhov VV: Organization of muscular system in planktonic larva of colonial kamptozoans. Dokl Adkad Nauk. 2012, 442 (4): 561-563.Google Scholar
- Lanzavecchia G, Carnevali C, Melone MD, Andrietti G, Celentano FC: Aristotle’s lantern of the regular sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus I Functional morphology and significance of bones, muscles and ligaments. Echinoderm biology. Edited by: Burke RD, Mladenov PV, Lambert P, Parseley RL. 1988, Rotterdam: Balkema, 649-662.Google Scholar
- Florey E, Cahill MA: Cholinergicmotor control of sea urchin tube feet: evidence for chemical transmission without synapses. J Exp Biol. 1980, 88: 281-292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Odintsova NA, Dyachuk VA, Nezlin LP: Muscle and neuronal differentiation in primary cell culture of larval Mytilus trossulus (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Cell Tissue Res. 2010, 339: 625-637. 10.1007/s00441-009-0918-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Temereva EN, Malakhov VV: Organization of the epistome in Phoronopsis harmeri (Phoronida) and consideration of the coelomic organization in Phoronida. Zoomorphology. 2011, 130: 121-134. 10.1007/s00435-011-0126-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Freeman G, Lundelius JW: The transition from planktotrophy to lecithotrophy in larvae of Lower Palaeozoic Rhynchonelliform brachiopods. Lethaia. 2005, 38: 219-254. 10.1080/00241160510013330.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nützel A, Lehnert O, Frýda J: Origin of planktotrophyFevidence from early molluscs: a response to Freeman and Lundelius. Evol Dev. 2007, 9 (4): 313-318. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00166.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altenburger A, Wanninger A: Neuromuscular development in Novocrania anomala: evidence for the presence of serotonin and a spiralian-like apical organ in lecithotrophic brachiopod larvae. Evol Dev. 2010, 12: 16-24. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2009.00387.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strathmann R: Ciliary sieving and active ciliary response in capture of particles by suspension-feeding brachiopod larvae. Acta Zool. 2005, 86: 41-54. 10.1111/j.0001-7272.2005.00185.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peterson KJ, Eernisse DJ: Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences. Evol Dev. 2001, 3: 170-205. 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003003170.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.