Development of human hip joint in the second and the third trimester of pregnancy; a cadaveric study
© Masłoń et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 13 December 2012
Accepted: 25 April 2013
Published: 7 May 2013
The purpose of the study was an evaluation of fetal hip joint morphology during the second and the third trimester of pregnancy. Serial sections were performed on 23 cadaver infants.
The mean lunar age was 6.6 months. Femoral shaft length (FSL) and width of the proximal and distal epiphysis were x-rayed to determine fetal age. The neck shaft angle (NSA), the femoral antetorsion angle (FAA), the acetabulum anteversion angle (AAA) and the acetabulum slope angle (ASA) were measured. Hip development ratios were plotted for all cadaveric species and revealed: flat FSL/NSA slope pattern, upward FSL/FAA slope pattern and downward slope pattern for FSL/ASA and FSL/AAA ratios. The changes, observed during the developmental period, were not statistically significant. NSA did not change during the second or the third pregnancy trimester. FAA increased during pregnancy but the changes were not statistically significant. AA, as well as ASA, showed a decreasing trend during the second and the third pregnancy trimester, however, with no correlations to age.
Despite an increasing depth and growing dimensions of the acetabulum in the uterus, its orientation does not change in any significant way.
KeywordsFetus Hip joint development Hip dysplasia Hip anatomy
There have been a few reports about embryological hip development during early stages of the intrauterine life period [1–3], however, the development of hip joint alone in the second and the third trimester of gestation has rather been poorly described, thus deserving much more attention of researchers. The actual knowledge is, in general, not exhaustive as it is, by and large, gained from animal experiments, MRI scans and radiograph analyses [2, 4].
The aim of the reported study was to determine fetal hip joint morphology during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
The study had been approved by the Bioethical Committee of the Medical University in Lodz. An informed consent was obtained from involved individuals for the storage and use of their foetuses for research purposes.
Femoral shaft length, proximal and distal epiphysis width and calculated lunar age of the studied fetuses
Femoral shaft length
Proximal epiphysis width
Distal epiphysis width
Age (lunar months)
Hip development ratios were plotted for all cadaveric samples. NSA values did not show any significant changes in time, being, on the average, at 119.8, SD 26.2. The slope of FSL vs. NSA was −0.628, R2 = 0.0091. The correlation index was −0.095, demonstrating a flay slope pattern.
The FAA ranged from 15 to 33 degrees. The slope of FSL vs. FAA was 0.197, R2 = 0.13. The correlation index was 0.36, revealing an upward slope pattern. The AAA ranged from six to 35 degrees. The slope of FSL vs. AAA was 0.3966, R2 = 151. The correlation index was −0.133, demonstrating a downward slope pattern. The ASA ranged from 51 to 85 degrees with the slope of FSL vs. ASA at 0.397, R2 = 0.152. The correlation index was 0.388, demonstrating a downward slope pattern.
Decreased antetorsion and cervicodiaphyseal angles in the femoral neck, observed from birth till the end of growth process, have – thus far – been subject of many studies [6–8]. It has been demonstrated in frontal and horizontal planes that an inclination and anteversion of the capital epiphyseal plate position make it perpendicular to the resulting force, applied to hip in walking , thus reducing both these angles. Obesity , cerebral palsy (muscle imbalance)  or destruction of the abduction muscles during surgery  may change physiological forces, which are normally transferred through the joint, leading to pathological deformation of the proximal femur.
In our study, FAA increased in the second and the third trimester of pregnancy, being thus suggestive of mechanical stress that could have remodelled the proximal femur. The, so-called, human or fetal position of both lower limbs in utero imposes a relatively perpendicular position onto the acetabulum anatomical axis and the femoral neck. The femur is upside down and the femoral head points backwards, due to the anteversion angle. In this position, any external rotation of the femur will increase FAA. Furthermore, with the time passing by, the fetus has less and less space available in the uterus and its legs are gradually being pushed toward the trunk. This could explain the positive correlation between age and FAA. In opposition to FAA angle, NSA is more stable, not changing significantly, either during the second or the third trimester of pregnancy.
Jouve at al. also found via anatomical studies that the anteversion angle increased during the second half of gestation . He drove a speculation that those changes may have been caused by mechanical stresses. Regarding the period before the 24th week of intrauterine life, no conclusion could be drawn because of possible, size-related confounders. Neither any conclusion could be drawn, concerning NSA . In the study of Walker and Goldsmith, the measured femoral angles demonstrated only a weak correlation with other hip variables and none of those angles appeared to be a useful indicator of normal joint development. Their observations indicate that soft tissue structures around the joint must play an important role in neonatal joint stability .
Following previously assumed theories and performed animal studies, Ralis and McKibbin confirmed, on the basis of their own cadaveric studies, that it was the shallow acetabulum, which was mostly responsible for neonatal hip instability It is well known that, in early gestational stages, the femoral head is accurately covered by the acetabulum. Later on, in gestational development, the proportion of the femoral head, covered by the acetabulum, decreases to its minimum, while increasing again after birth . A further work by Walker and Goldsmith confirmed that the acetabular depth was the slowest growing variable in the perinatal period . Lee at al. found that acetabular anteversion and femoral head coverage did not change significantly in early fetal stages (six to 20 weeks) . Withby et al., being supported by postmortem MRI studies (gestation age between 17 and 42 weeks), identified some development in the acetabular dimension till the 20th week, when growth demonstrated an exponential rate .
Limitations of the study
The results of performed measurements are highly variable, what hampers any statistically significant conclusions with such relatively low patient numbers. A precise foetal age was unknown, being merely assumed from x-rayed femur length. Direct measurements on fetal specimens were affected by some error, resulting from small sizes of measured organs.
The observed changes in the acetabulum position were not as dynamic as those in the proximal part of the femur. Our study focused on AAA, as well as on ASA changes in the second and the third trimester of pregnancy, demonstrating that only mild changes of those angles did not correlate with age during the period. In consequence, it may be speculated that neither the pelvis nor the acetabulum changes its position as much as the femur, thus allowing to regard the above-mentioned angles as relatively unchanged. On the basis of both previous studies and our observations, a conclusion may be drawn that, despite overtly increasing depth and dimensions of the acetabulum in the uterus, its orientation does not change in any significant way.
The study had been approved by the Bioethical Committee of the Medical University of Łódź, Poland. An informed consent was obtained from individuals for storage and use of their foetuses for research purposes.
Source(s) of support in the form of grants, equipment, drugs, or all of these – none.
- Lee J, Jarvis J, Uhthoff HK, Avruch L: The fetal acetabulum. A histomorphometric study of acetabular anteversion and femoral head coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992, 281: 48-55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitby EH, Bell MJ, Rigby AS, Burton M: Measuring hip development using magnetic resonance imaging. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007, 27: 898-902. 10.1097/bpo.0b013e31815a5ff1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilkinson JA: Congenital displacement of the hip joint. 1985, Berlin; New York: SpringerView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krasny R, Prescher A, Botschek A, Lemke R, Casser HR, Adam G: MR-anatomy of infants hip: comparison to anatomical preparations. Pediatr Radiol. 1991, 21: 211-215. 10.1007/BF02011051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fazekas IG, Kósa F: Forensic fetal osteology. 1978, Budapest: Akadémiai KiadóGoogle Scholar
- Fabeck L, Tolley M, Rooze M, Burny F: Theoretical study of the decrease in the femoral neck anteversion during growth. Cells Tissues Organs. 2002, 171: 269-275. 10.1159/000063127.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fabry G, MacEwen GD, Shands AR: Torsion of the femur. A follow-up study in normal and abnormal conditions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973, 55: 1726-1738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruby L, Mital MA, O'Connor J, Patel U: Anteversion of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979, 61: 46-51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galbraith RT, Gelberman RH, Hajek PC, Baker LA, Sartoris DJ, Rab GT, Cohen MS: Griffin PP:Obesity and decreased femoral anteversion in adolescence. J Orthop Res. 1987, 5: 523-528. 10.1002/jor.1100050407.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bobroff ED, Chambers HG, Sartoris DJ, Wyatt MP, Sutherland DH: Femoral anteversion and neck-shaft angle in children with cerebral palsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999, 364: 194-204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brien EW, Lane JM, Healey J: Progressive coxa valga after childhood excision of the hip abductor muscles. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995, 15: 95-97. 10.1097/01241398-199501000-00020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jouve JL, Glard Y, Garron E, Piercecchi MD, Dutour O, Tardieu C, Bollini G: Anatomical study of the proximal femur in the fetus. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005, 14: 105-110. 10.1097/01202412-200503000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walker JM, Goldsmith CH: Morphometric study of the fetal development of the human hip joint: significance for congenital hip disease. Yale J Biol Med. 1981, 54: 411-437.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rális Z, McKibbin B: Changes in shape of the human hip joint during its development and their relation to its stability. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1973, 55: 780-785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.