Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

The gene transformer-2 of Sciara (Diptera, Nematocera) and its effect on Drosophilasexual development

BMC Developmental Biology201111:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-11-19

©  Martín et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

  • Received: 2 November 2010
  • Accepted: 15 March 2011
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The gene transformer-2, which is involved in sex determination, has been studied in Drosophila, Musca, Ceratitis, Anastrepha and Lucilia. All these members of Diptera belong to the suborder Brachycera. In this work, it is reported the isolation and characterisation of genes transformer-2 of the dipterans Sciara ocellaris and Bradysia coprophila (formerly Sciara coprophila), which belong to the much less extensively analysed Sciaridae Family of the Suborder Nematocera, which is paraphyletic with respect to Suborder Brachycera.

Results

The transformer-2 genes of the studied Sciara species were found to be transcribed in both sexes during development and adult life, in both the soma and germ lines. They produced a single primary transcript, which follows the same alternative splicing in both sexes, giving rise to different mRNAs isoforms. In S. ocellaris the most abundant mRNA isoform encoded a full-length protein of 251 amino acids, while that of B. coprophila encoded a protein of 246 amino acids. Both showed the features of the SR protein family. The less significant mRNA isoforms of both species encoded truncated, presumably non-functional Transformer-2 proteins. The comparison of the functional Sciara Transformer-2 proteins among themselves and those of other insects revealed the greatest degree of conservation in the RRM domain and linker region. In contrast, the RS1 and RS2 domains showed extensive variation with respect to their number of amino acids and their arginine-serine (RS) dipeptide content. The expression of S. ocellaris Transformer-2 protein in Drosophila XX pseudomales lacking the endogenous transformer-2 function caused their partial feminisation.

Conclusions

The transformer-2 genes of both Sciaridae species encode a single protein in both sexes that shares the characteristics of the Transformer-2 proteins of other insects. These proteins showed conserved sex-determination function in Drosophila; i.e., they were able to form a complex with the endogenous Drosophila Transformer protein that controls the female-specific splicing of the Drosophila doublesex pre-mRNA. However, it appears that the complex formed between the Drosophila Transformer protein and the Sciara Transformer-2 protein is less effective at inducing the female-specific splicing of the endogenous Drosophila doublesex pre-mRNA than the DrosophilaTransformer-Transformer2 complex. This suggests the existence of species-specific co-evolution of the Transformer and Transformer-2 proteins.

Keywords

  • Sciara
  • sex determination
  • transformer-2 gene

Background

Sex determination refers to the developmental programme that commits the embryo to following either the male or the female pathway. Recent years have seen a great amount of interest in the evolution of developmental mechanisms at the genetic and molecular levels, and in determining the evolutionary processes by which these mechanisms came into existence. Given the great variety of sex determination mechanisms, this process is exceptionally suitable for comparative study. Indeed, sex determination has long been of major interest not only as a developmental process but also because of the evolutionary problem it poses - a problem that can only be solved by identifying and comparing the genetic structures of sex determination pathways. Molecular genetic technologies now allow such comparisons to be made. In addition, sex determination in the Drosophila melanogaster reference system is known in fine detail, making truly informative comparisons possible.

The characterisation of the sex determination genes in D. melanogaster has shown that their control during development is governed by the sex-specific splicing of their products (reviewed in [1]). The product of a gene controls the sex-specific splicing of the pre-mRNA from the downstream gene in the genetic cascade. Sex-lethal (Sxl) is at the top of this cascade and acts as the memory device for female sexual development via its auto-regulatory function: its product controls the splicing of its own pre-mRNA [2, 3]. In addition, Sxl controls the splicing of the pre-mRNA from the downstream gene transformer (tra) [4–6]. The Tra product and the product of the constitutive gene transformer-2 (tra-2) control the sex-specific splicing of pre-mRNA from the gene doublesex (dsx) [7–10], which is transcribed in both sexes but gives rise to two different proteins, DsxF and DsxM [11, 12]. These are transcription factors that impose female and male sexual development respectively via the sex-specific regulation of the so-called sexual cytodifferentiation genes.

Genes homologous to the sex determination genes of D. melanogaster have been sought in other insects (reviewed in [13–15]). In the sciarid flies, which belong to the dipteran suborder Nematocera, only the orthologues of gene Sxl have been characterised in Sciara ocellaris [16], Bradysia coprophila, Rynchosciara americana and Trichosia pubescens [17]. The Sxl gene of these species is not regulated in a sex-specific fashion, and therefore the same Sxl transcript encoding the functional Sxl protein is found in both males and females. Thus, in the sciarids, Sxl does not appear to play the key discriminating role in sex determination that it plays in Drosophila.

Apart from in D. melanogaster, the gene tra-2 has been studied in D. virilis [18], and has been characterised in the housefly Musca domestica [19], in the tephritid Ceratitis capitata [20, 21], in twelve Anastrepha species [22], and in the calliphorid Lucilia cuprina [23]. Outside the dipterans, tra-2 has been isolated in the lepidopteron Bombyx mori [24]. In all cases tra-2 is transcribed in both sexes during development, producing the same protein in males and females. The injection of Musca tra-2 dsRNA into Musca embryos results in the complete transformation of genotypically female embryos into fertile adult males, highlighting the role of tra-2 in Musca sex determination. This gene is required for the female-specific splicing of Musca dsx pre-mRNA. It also participates in the autocatalytic activity of gene F [19], i.e., the Musca tra orthologous gene [25], the key sex-determining gene in the housefly [26]. The injection of the respective tra2-dsRNA into Ceratitis [21] and Anastrepha [22] results in the destruction of endogenous tra-2 function in both species and the subsequent male-specific splicing of the endogenous tra and dsx pre-mRNAs, leading to the transformation of genotypically female embryos into adult pseudomales. This highlights the role of tra-2 in Ceratitis and Anastrepha sex determination.

The present paper reports the isolation and characterisation of tra-2 of S. ocellaris and B. coprophila (formerly Sciara coprophila). Their Tra2 proteins were compared to other known insect Tra2 proteins and the effect of Sciara tra-2 on Drosophila sex determination analysed.

Results and discussion

Molecular organisation of tra-2 in S. ocellaris and B. coprophila

The first step in the isolation of the S. ocellaris tra-2 gene (Sotra2) was to perform RT-PCR on total RNA from adults. Reverse transcription was performed using the primer oligo-dT, while two-nested PCR reactions were performed with three degenerated primers: Mar17, Mar26 and Tra2.B (the location and the sequences of the primers used in this work are shown in Additional file 1). The first PCR reaction was performed using the primer pair Mar26 plus Mar17, the second using Mar26 plus Tra2.B. An amplicon of 133 bp was amplified, cloned and sequenced. The conceptual amino acid sequence of this amplicon showed a high degree of similarity with the 3' region of the RRM domain of the D. melanogaster Tra2 protein, indicating that a fragment of the putative SoTra2 protein had been isolated.

Nested PCR reactions were then performed in 3' and 5' RACE analyses. The amplicons were then cloned and sequenced. A GenomeWalker library for S. ocellaris was then synthesised and used to perform PCR genome-walking on the genomic DNA of S. ocellaris from the initial amplicon towards the 5' and 3' directions. The genomic amplicons were cloned and sequenced. The sequences of the genomic fragments thus generated were compared with the cDNA sequences previously determined. In this way, the exon/intron junctions were unambiguously identified. Figure 1A shows the molecular organisation of Sotra2. Its transcription unit was made up of 4601 bp and was composed of six exons and five introns (Figure 1A). The transcription start site was located 94 bp upstream of the translation initiation codon.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Molecular organisation of the gene tra-2 of S. ocellaris (A) and B. coprophila (B) and their transcripts. Exons (boxes) and introns (dotted lines) are not drawn to scale. The colours in the scheme showing the molecular organisation of the gene and in the schemes corresponding to the different mRNA isoforms indicate the 5'- and 3'-UTR regions (in garnet), the protein coding exons (in green) and the specific exon in one of the mRNA isoforms (see text) (in orange). The colours in the scheme showing the proteins designate the RS1 and RS2 domains (in blue) and the RRM domain (in brown). The numbers inside the boxes indicate the number of the exon, while numbers within parenthesis indicate the number of nucleotides composing the exons and introns. The beginning and the end of the ORF are indicated by ATG and TAA respectively. AAA stands for poly-A(+). The arrow indicates the transcription initiation site. RS1, RS2 and RRM denote the corresponding domains of the putative Tra-2 protein.

Overlapping PCR on total RNA of S. ocellaris males and females showed that the gene Sotra2 mainly produced the transcript Sotra2-251, formed by exons E1-E2-E3-E4b-E5-E6 (1177 bp). This encoded a full-length putative Tra2 protein of 251 amino acids that included the RS1, RS2 and RRM domains characteristic of the Tra2 proteins. Two other less abundant transcripts were also detected: Sotra2-204 and Sotra2-130 (Figure 1A) (see Methods). The Sotra2-204 transcript differed from Sotra2-251 in its lack of exon 3, and it encoded a putative Tra2 protein of 204 amino acids that differed from the full Tra2 protein in its shorter RS1 domain. The Sotra2-130 transcript differed from Sotra2-251 by the inclusion of exon E4a. The latter carries translation stop codons causing the production of a truncated Tra2 protein 130 amino acids long and lacking both the RRM and RS2 domains.

To isolate the gene tra-2 of B. coprophila (Bctra2), the same strategy used for the isolation of this gene in S. ocellaris was followed, except that the initial step involved PCR amplification of the genomic DNA of adults using primers expSoT2.1 and expSoT2.2, corresponding to exons 5 and 6 of Sotra2. A genomic fragment of 1069 bp was amplified, cloned and sequenced. Its sequence showed 61% similarity to the corresponding region of Sotra2, suggesting that a genomic fragment of Bctra2 had been cloned. As for Sotra2, 5'RACE, 3'RACE and genome-walking methodologies were used to determine the molecular organisation of Bctra2 (Figure 1B). Its transcription unit was made up of 4255 bp and was composed of six exons and five introns.

Overlapping PCR performed on total RNA of males and females of B. coprophila showed that the gene Bctra2 mainly produced the transcript Bctra2-246, formed by exons E1-E2-E3-E4b-E5-E6 (1444 bp). This encoded a full putative Tra2 protein of 246 amino acids and included the RS1, RS2 and RRM domains characteristic of Tra2 proteins. Three other less abundant transcripts were also detected: Bctra2-203, Bctra2-99 and Bctra2-75 (Figure 1B) (see Methods). The Bctra2-203 transcript differed from Bctra2-246 in its lack of exon 3; it encoded a putative Tra2 protein of 203 amino acids. The Bctra2-99 transcript varied from Bctra2-246 by the inclusion of exon E4a, which carries translation stop codons. Thus, it produced a truncated Tra2 protein of 99 amino acids that lacked both the RRM and RS2 domains. Finally, the Bctra2-75 transcript, made up by exons E1, E2 and E6, encoded a truncated Tra2 protein with short RS1, RRM and RS2 domains.

Expression pattern of tra-2 in S. ocellaris and B. coprophila

The expression of tra2 in S. ocellaris was studied by performing RT-PCR on total RNA from a mixture of male plus female embryos, from a mixture of male plus female larvae at different developmental stages, from the heads plus thoraces of male and female adults (separately), from the abdomens of male and female adults (separately), and from adult ovaries and testis (separately). The expression of tra2 in B. coprophila was similarly analysed, although in this case it was possible to distinguish male from female embryos as well as male from female larvae (see Methods). The primers used were expSoT2.1 from exon 5 and expSoT2.2 from exon 6 (Figure 2A), which have the same sequence in both Sciara species. The expression of the constitutive gene rpL10, which encodes the ribosomal protein L10, was used as a control in RT-PCR. In all cases, a fragment of 273 bp was amplified (Figure 2B,C). This was cloned and sequenced, confirming that it corresponded to the expected Sotra2 or Bctra2 fragment. Negative controls in all these PCR reactions produced no amplicons (see Methods). These results indicate that the genes Sotra2 and Bctra2 are expressed at all developmental stages and during adult life in both sexes, including in the gonads of males and females.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Expression of tra-2 of S. ocellaris and B. coprophila. (A) Molecular organisation (only exons are shown) of the Sciara tra-2 transcript with the primers used. The meaning of the colours is explained in the legend to Figure 1. (B) RT-PCR analyses of total RNA from S. ocellaris embryos (E), larvae (L), whole male adults (M), testis (T), adult male abdomens (MA), adult male head plus thorax (MHT), whole adult females (F), ovaries (O), adult female abdomens (MA), and adult female head plus thorax (MHT). (C) RT-PCR analyses of total RNA from B. coprophila whole male adults (M), male embryos (ME), male larvae (ML), adult male head plus thorax (MHT), testis (T), whole female adults (F), female embryos (FE), female larvae (FL), adult female head plus thorax (FHT) and ovaries (O). Protein L10 was used as a control of the expression of the gene rpL10, which codes for the constitutive ribosomal protein.

Comparison of the molecular organisation of Sciara tra-2gene with that of other insects

The gene tra-2 of D. melanogaster gives rise to three mRNAs by alternative splicing pathways and alternative promoters, which encode three distinct isoforms of the Tra2 protein [27, 28]. In B. mori, tra-2 produces six different transcripts by alternative splicing pathways, which encode six distinct isoforms of the Tra2 protein [24]. In the case of other dipterans such as C. capitata [20, 21], Anastrepha species [22], M. domestica [19] and L. cuprina [23], only a single tra-2 mRNA was detected.

Figure 3 compares the molecular organisation of Sciara tra-2 with tra-2 of Drosophila, Ceratitis, Musca and Bombyx. The number of exons varies: six in Sciara, seven in Drosophila, eight in Ceratitis and Musca, and nine in Bombyx. In Sciara, all the exon/intron junctions agree with the consensus GT/AG. These joints are found in the same position in S. ocellaris and B. coprophila. Similarly, the connection between exons 5 and 6 is in the same position in all these species. The RS1 and RRM domains of the putative Tra2 proteins are encoded by the exons E2-E4 and exons E5-E6 respectively in all species. However, the RS2 domain is encoded by exon E6 in Sciara, by exons E6-E7 in Drosophila, by exons E6b-E7 in Ceratitis, by exons E6-E7 in Musca, and by exons E7-E8 in Bombyx. The gene tra-2 has a single promoter except in Drosophila, which carries two promoters.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Comparison of the molecular organisation of tra-2 of S. ocellaris, B. coprophila, D. melanogaster, C. capitata, M. domestica and B. mori. Exons (boxes) and introns (dashed lines) are not drawn to scale. For the rest of symbols and colours see legend to Figure 1.

Comparison of the Tra2 protein of Sciarawith that of other insects

The conceptual translation of the Sotra2-251 and Bctra2-246 mRNAs showed them to encode a polypeptide with the main structural features characteristic of the SR protein family, i.e., the RNA-binding motif (RRM) and two RS-domains. These are rich in serine-arginine dipeptides and confer upon these proteins the capacity to interact with others.

The putative Tra2 protein of the dipterans S. ocellaris and B. coprophila (Sciaridae, suborder Nematocera) were compared to those of the dipterans belonging to the suborder Brachycera, i.e., D. melanogaster (Drosophilidae), C. capitata (Tephritidae), M. domestica (Muscidae) and L. cuprina (Calliphoridae), and that of the lepidopteran B. mori. Figure 4 shows their alignment. The number of amino acids in these Tra2 proteins varied: S. ocellaris 251, B. coprophila 246, D. melanogaster 264, C. capitata 251, M. domestica 232, L. cuprina 271, and B. mori 274. These differences are due to changes throughout the Tra2 protein except in the RRM domain and the linker region (72 and 19 amino acids respectively) in all these species. The highest degree of similarity (measured as identical plus conserved amino acids) to S. ocellaris was shown by B. coprophila (86%) (as expected for species belonging to the same Family), followed by Musca (46.9%), Bombyx (44.6%), Ceratitis (42.6%), Lucilia (39,4%) and Drosophila (36.3%). The highest degree of similarity was observed in the RRM (55.5-94.4%) and the linker region (68.4-100%). In fact, the linker region is a signature motif of Tra2 proteins [29]. This conservation agrees with the fundamental role of RRM in the function of the Tra-Tra2 complex, conferring upon the complex its capacity to interact with the tra and dsx pre-mRNAs and thus regulate its sex-specific splicing. The similarity of the RS1 (21.8-87.6%) and RS2 (28.2-81.6%) domains was lower and a variable number of SR dipeptides were seen, ranging from 11 to 18 for RS1 and 3 to 6 for RS2. Variation in the content of RS dipeptides seems to be a feature of the SR proteins whenever they are maintained enough to preserve their function [30].
Figure 4
Figure 4

Comparison of the Tra-2 predicted polypeptides of the Sciara species with Tra-2 of other insects. The RS1 and RS2 domains are in pink, the RRM domain is in yellow and the linker region is in green. RNP1 and RNP2 are the consensus sequences for RNA binding. The red vertical lines indicate the exon-intron junctions. Accession numbers: S. ocellaris [EMB: FR716529], B. coprophila [EMB: FR716530], D. melanogaster [EMBL:M23633], C. capitata [EMBL:EU999754], M. domestica [EMBL:AY847518], L. cuprinia [EMBL:FJ461620] and B. mori [EMBL:NM_001126233]

Effect of the gene tra-2 of Sciara on the somatic sexual development of Drosophila

Outside Drosophila, the function of tra-2 in sex determination has been unambiguously demonstrated in M. domestica [19], in C. capitata [21] and in Anastrepha [22] using the interference-RNA technique, which permits functional studies of genes in genetically less amenable organisms. An imperative of this technique is to have markers that allow one to determine whether male survivors really do correspond to XX females that have been transformed into pseudomales by the destruction of the endogenous tra-2 gene function, or to normal XY males. In the case of the insects mentioned above, this distinction was possible thanks to the existence of molecular markers located on the Y chromosome [19, 21] and to the different morphology of the X and Y chromosomes [22]. However, the lack of molecular makers, plus the fact that Sciara females are XX and males are X0, together with the extreme fragility of their tiny eggs, makes this RNAi procedure unfeasible for these insects at the present time. Thus, direct proof of the role of tra-2 in Sciara sex determination remains elusive.

Notwithstanding, we were able to study whether the Sciara Tra2 protein shows conserved sex-determination function in Drosophila. The rationale of the experiment was to express transgenic SoTra2 protein in Drosophila XX pseudomales lacking the tra-2 gene function and checked whether these pseudomales showed feminisation. The GAL4-UAS system was used to analyse the effect of the Sciara tra-2 gene in Drosophila.

The systemic expression of SoTra2 with the ubiquitous-expression da-GAL4 or hs-GAL4 drivers was found to be lethal to both male and female flies. The same lethality has been observed in Drosophila males and females that ectopically express their own Tra2 protein [31]. Therefore, the rn-GAL4 local expression driver was used. This driver expresses GAL4 in agreement with the expression domain of the gene rotund (rn), which is expressed in the tarsal region of the foreleg imaginal disc [32], a well-characterised sexually dimorphic region of Drosophila. For details of the experimental design see Methods.

Figure 5 shows the effect of expressing the SoTra2 protein on the sexually dimorphic development of the foreleg basitarsus in XX pseudomales and in their brother XY males, both mutant for tra-2 and carrying Sotra2-UAS, rn-GAL4 and Tub-GAL80 ts . The foreleg basitarsus contained several transversal rows, the last one forming the sex comb structure (SC) in males and in XX pseudomales mutants for tra-2. This is composed of dark, thick bristles, and is rotated to lie parallel to the proximal-distal leg axis (Figure 5C). Females lack the sex comb (Figure 5B). A significant reduction (P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA) was seen in the number of bristles forming the male sex comb structure in the foreleg basitarsus of XX pseudomales raised at 25°C (expressing the SoTra2 protein) (see Figure 5D and the enlargement in Figure 5E) compared to those raised at 18°C (no expression of the SoTra2 protein) (see Figure 5C). The sex comb size of these latter pseudomales was the same as the sex comb of their XY brothers whether raised at 18 or 25°C (Figure 5A). Thus, the Sciara Tra-2 protein supplies tra-2 function in Drosophila.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Effect of the Sciara tra-2 gene on the somatic development of Drosophila. (A) Size (number of bristles) of the sex comb in the Sotra2 transgenic Drosophila flies. The bars in the histograms represent the 95% confidence limits. The sample size is given in parenthesis underneath the histogram. The full genotype of XX pseudomales is ywTDSo#7/w; tra-2 B /Df(2R)trix,tra-2-; Tub-GAL80 ts ,w + /rn-GAL4,w + and that of their brothers is XY males ywTDSo#7/Y; tra-2 B /Df(2R)trix,tra-2-; Tub-GAL80 ts ,w + /rn-GAL4,w + . The cross to generate these flies was: females ywTDSo#7; tra-2 B /CyO,Cy; Tub-GAL80 ts ,w + and males w/Y; Df(2R)trix,tra-2-/CyO,Cy; rn-GAL4,w + . (B) Foreleg basitarsus of wild type female. (C) Foreleg basitarsus of XX pseudomale mutant for tra-2 at 18°C, in which the Sciara Tra-2 is not expressed. (D) Foreleg basitarsus of XX pseudomale mutant for tra-2 at 25°C, in which the Sciara Tra-2 is partially expressed. (E) Enlargement of D. SC stands for sex comb.

This reversion of the male towards the female phenotype of the foreleg basitarsus in XX pseudomales mutant for tra-2 and expressing the SoTra2 protein is probably caused by the presence of the endogenous Drosophila DsxF protein. As mentioned in the Introduction, the Tra-Tra2 complex controls the female-specific splicing of the dsx pre-mRNA. If the Sciara Tra2 protein is capable of forming a complex with the endogenous Drosophila Tra protein, then this complex could bind to specific sequences in the female-specific exon of dsx pre-mRNA. This would promote its inclusion in mature dsxF mRNA, which encodes the DsxF protein that establishes female development. This expectation was confirmed at the molecular level.

The effect of Sciara Tra2 protein on the splicing control of Drosophila dsx pre-mRNA was studied in transgenic Drosophila XX flies mutant for tra-2 and expressing the Sciara Tra2 protein (Figure 6). The inducible hs-GAL4 driver was used to express the Sotra2 transgene. XX pseudomales yw/w; Df(2R)trix,tra-2[-] /tra-2 B ; Sotra2/hs-GAL4 were produced at 25°C (see cross in the legend to Figure 6). After the hatching of the adults the flies were divided into two populations; one was maintained at 25°C (control flies) and one subjected to heat-shock pulses (experimental flies) to induce the expression of the Sotra2 transgene. Total RNA was extracted and used in RT-PCR to determine the splicing pattern of the endogenous dsx primary transcript. rp49, which codes for the constitutive ribosomal protein 49 [33], was used as an RT-PCR control. At 25°C, the four transgenic lines only expressed the male dsx mRNA isoform (data not shown); this was to be expected since they lack the endogenous tra-2 function and do not express the Sotra2 transgene. After the heat shocks, however, these transgenic lines expressed the female dsx mRNA isoform (Figure 6B). Two amplicons were detected. The smaller one (646 bp) corresponded to the female dsxF mRNA. The larger amplicon (758 bp) was to be expected if the intron 3 were retained (Figure 6A,B). The cloning and sequencing of both fragments confirmed these suppositions. These results were not the consequence of the heat-shocks since their brothers (males yw/Y; Df(2R)trix,tra2[-]/tra-2 B ; Sotra2/hs-GAL4) expressing the Sotra2 transgene did not express the female dsx mRNA isoform (Figure 6C). Negative controls for all these PCR reactions produced no amplicons (see Methods). Thus, the Sciara Tra2 protein is able to promote the female-specific splicing of the Drosophila dsx pre-mRNA.
Figure 6
Figure 6

Effect of the Sciara tra-2 gene on the splicing of Drosophila dsx pre-mRNA. (A) Molecular organisation of Drosophila dsx pre-mRNA showing the male and the female splicing pattern. Exons are represented in boxes and introns by dotted lines. The female-specific exon is showing in green and the male-specific exons are shown in blue. (B) RT-PCR analyses of total RNA from D. melanogaster XX pseudomales mutant for tra-2 and either not expressing (25°C) or expressing (HS) the Sciara tra-2 transgene. TDSo#2 stands for XX pseudomale of genotype yw/w; tra-2 B /Df(2R)trix,tra-2 - ; TDSo#2/hs-GAL4,w + ; TDSo#3 stands for XX pseudomale of genotype yw/w; tra-2 B /Df(2R)trix,tra-2 - ; TDSo#3/hs-GAL4,w + ; TDSo#4 stands for XX pseudomale of genotype yw/w; tra-2 B /Df(2R)trix,tra-2 - ; TDSo#4/hs-GAL4,w + and TDSo#5 stands for XX pseudomale of genotype yw/w; tra-2 B /Df(2R)trix,tra-2 - ; TDSo#5/hs-GAL4,w + . (C) RT-PCR analyses of total RNA from D. melanogaster XY males mutant for tra-2 (brothers of the XX pseudomales) expressing the Sciara tra-2 transgene. TDSo#2 stands for XY male of genotype yw/Y; tra-2 B /Df(2R)trix,tra-2 - ; TDSo#2/hs-GAL4,w + ; TDSo#3 stands for XY male of genotype yw/Y; tra-2 B /Df(2R)trix,tra-2 - ; TDSo#3/hs-GAL4,w + ; TDSo#4 stands for XY male of genotype yw/Y; tra-2 B /Df(2R)trix,tra-2 - ; TDSo#4/hs-GAL4,w + and TDSo#5 stands for XY male of genotype yw/Y; tra-2 B /Df(2R)trix,tra-2 - ; TDSo#5/hs-GAL4,w + . The cross to generate these XX pseudomales and XY males flies was: females yw; tra-2 B /CyO,Cy; TDSo# and males w/Y; Df(2R)trix,tra-2 - /CyO,Cy; hs-GAL4,w + . As a control, the splicing of the primary transcript of gene rp49 that codes for the constitutive ribosomal protein 49 [33] was monitored.

Whereas the expression of Sciara Tra2 protein in the XX pseudomales produced their feminisation, its expression in their XY normal brothers mutant for tra-2 did not affect their normal male development. This different effect is explained by the presence of Tra protein in the XX pseudomales and its absence in XY normal males. The Drosophila Tra protein seems to lack an RNA binding domain, thus its influence in female development is exerted at the level of its interaction (via SR domains) with other proteins carrying RNA-binding domains, such as Tra2 (reviewed in [34]). Therefore, the Sciara Tra2 protein would form a complex with the endogenous Drosophila Tra protein to promote the female-specific splicing of the Drosophila dsx pre-mRNA.

The feminisation produced by the Sciara Tra2 protein was, however, partial, indicating that the function of this protein in Drosophila was incomplete. There are two possible explanations for this. It might be due to an insufficient quantity of Sciara Tra2 protein being produced in the Drosophila transgenic flies; it was necessary to restrict the amount of Sciara Tra2 protein that was expressed since the production of any greater amount is lethal. However, although this possibility cannot be rejected outright it seems unlikely since Drosophila XX flies with a single dose of tra-2 develop as normal females; i.e., a single dose of the endogenous tra-2 gene supplies enough Drosophila Tra2 protein for normal female development to be followed. Alternatively, the interaction between the endogenous Drosophila Tra protein and the transgenic Sciara Tra2 protein might be affected such that the DrosophilaTra-SciaraTra2 complex is less efficient than the DrosophilaTra-Tra2 complex at inducing the female-specific splicing of the endogenous Drosophila dsx pre-mRNA. This explanation agrees with the presence of the aberrant spliced dsxF mRNA isoform in XX pseudomales expressing the Sciara Tra2 protein in addition to the normally spliced dsxF mRNA. Note that this isoform contains intron 3, the target where the Tra-Tra2 complex binds to promote its inclusion into mature dsxF mRNA [7–10]. Further, the retention of intron 3 does not appear to be the consequence of any general trouble in the splicing of dsx pre-mRNA since intron 2 (and probably also intron 1) is normally spliced.

This aberrant dsxF mRNA isoform has been also found in Drosophila XX pseudomales mutant for the endogenous tra gene and expressing the Anastrepha Tra protein, whereas Drosophila XX flies with different doses of the endogenous tra and tra-2 genes do not show this abnormally spliced dsxF mRNA isoform [35]. With respect to the proposed inefficient interaction between the endogenous Drosophila Tra protein and the transgenic Sciara Tra2 protein, the high degree of divergence between the Sciara and the Drosophila Tra2 proteins should be noted. This divergence was mainly observed in the RS domains, which are involved in protein-protein interactions. Hence, the interaction between the Sciara Tra2 protein and the Drosophila Tra protein might be impeded as a consequence of changes accumulated in these proteins after the Sciara and Drosophila phylogenetic lineages separated. These results suggest that Tra and Tra2 proteins co-evolved to exert their functions in sex determination. To this respect, it is worth mentioning that the D. virilis tra-2 gene can fully replace the endogenous tra-2 function of D. melanogaster for normal female sexual development [18]. The similarity between the D. melanogaster and D. virilis Tra-2 proteins is 51,5% [22], whereas the similarity between the D. melanogaster and S. ocellaris Tra-2 proteins is 36.3% [this work].

Conclusions

The transformer-2 genes of both Sciaridae species encode a single protein in both sexes that shares the characteristics of the Transformer-2 proteins of other insects. These proteins showed conserved sex-determination function in Drosophila; i.e., they were able to form a complex with the endogenous Drosophila Transformer protein that controls the female-specific splicing of the Drosophila doublesex pre-mRNA. However, it appears that the complex formed between the Drosophila Transformer protein and the Sciara Transformer-2 protein is less effective at inducing the female-specific splicing of the endogenous Drosophila doublesex pre-mRNA than the DrosophilaTransformer-Transformer2 complex. This suggests the existence of species-specific co-evolution of the Transformer and Transformer-2 proteins.

Methods

Flies and crosses

Sciarid flies were raised on "Compost Villacasa" medium for culturing mushrooms. S. ocellaris is a digenic species so that females produce both sexes, whereas B. coprophila is a monogenic species with two types of females: gynogenic females, which produce only females, and androgenic females, which produce only males.

Drosophila flies were cultured on standard food. For the description of the mutant alleles and GAL4 constructs see Lindsley and Zimm [36] and FlyBase. Flies used for the analysis of the adult forelegs were kept in a mixture of ethanol:glycerol (3:1) for several days. They were then macerated in 10% KOH at 60°C for 15 min, thoroughly washed with water, and mounted in Faure's solution for inspection under a compound microscope.

Experimental design to analyse the effect of the gene tra-2 of Sciara on the somatic sexual development of Drosophila

As mentioned in the text, the systemic expression of SoTra2 with the ubiquitous-expression da-GAL4 or hs-GAL4 drivers was found to be lethal to both male and female flies. Therefore, the rn-GAL4 local expression driver was used. Nevertheless, it was necessary to find out the experimental conditions that allowed us to study the effect of the gene tra-2 of Sciara on the somatic sexual development of Drosophila. The rn-GAL4 driver expresses GAL4 in agreement with the expression domain of the gene rotund (rn) [32]. This gene is expressed in imaginal discs as well as in the embryonic and larval central nervous systems (CNS) [32]. The expression of rn in the tarsal region of the foreleg imaginal disc commences during the early third larval instar, but is no longer evident in the late third instar [32]. This methodology has been used to ablate the sex comb in Drosophila males expressing the Transformer protein under the rn-GAL4 driver [37]. The expression of Sotra2 by the rn-GAL4 driver was also lethal to both males and females. This might be due to the expression of Sotra2 in the embryonic and/or larval CNS, as mentioned above. To prevent embryonic lethality a strategy was followed that allowed the temporal control of Sotra2 expression under the rn-GAL4 driver during development. For this purpose the GAL4/GAL80 system was used. The GAL80 protein inhibits GAL4 function. GAL80 is temperature sensitive, with 18°C the most permissive temperature and 29°C the most restrictive [38]. Drosophila XX pseudomales mutant for tra-2 and carrying Sotra-2-UAS together with rn-GAL4 and Tub-GAL80 ts were produced. The cross producing these pseudomales was performed at 18°C, and several two-days egg collections were made. Three days later each collection was transferred to 29°C environment. By this time the larvae had hatched, which were maintained at this temperature for the rest of their development. This treatment eliminated the embryonic lethality caused by the expression of the SoTra2 protein; at 18°C the UAS-Sotra2 transgen is not expressed since the GAL4 protein from the rn-GAL4 driver is not functional due to the function of GAL80ts protein. However, the expression of Sotra2 during the larval stage could not be prevented since at 29°C this transgene is expressed due to the inactivation of the GAL80ts protein. Even under these conditions, the males and females expressing the SoTra2 protein were lethally affected, probably because of an excess of this transgenic protein affecting the development of the larval CNS. Finally, we took advantage of the fact that at 25°C the GAL80ts protein retains some function [38]. It was reasoned that if XX pseudomales mutant for tra-2 and carrying Sotra-2-UAS, rn-GAL4 and Tub-GAL80 ts can develop at that temperature, the GAL4 from the rn-GAL4 driver ought not to be completely inhibited. Consequently a certain amount of SoTra2 protein ought to be produced (less than at 29°C) but which might not be lethal. Thus, these pseudomales might be able to survive to adulthood. This was the case.

Molecular analyses

Genomic DNA was extracted from frozen specimens as described in Maniatis et al. [39]. Total RNA from adult female ovaries, adult male testis, embryos, larvae, and adult male and female somatic cells was prepared using the Ultraspec-II RNA isolation kit (Biotecx) following the manufacturer's instructions. Five micrograms of total RNA from each sample were reverse transcribed with Superscript (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcription reactions were performed with an oligo-dT. Two percent of the synthesised cDNA was amplified by PCR. All amplicons were analysed by electrophoresis in agarose gels, cloned using the TOPO TA-cloning kit (Invitrogen) or PGEM-T vector (Promega) following the manufacturer's instructions, and sequenced. In all cases, PCR reactions with RNA samples were performed to guarantee there was no contamination with genomic DNA (negative controls of PCR reactions). The relative abundance of distinct mRNA isoforms was inferred from the different intensity of their corresponding amplicons in the agarose gels showing the products of the RT-PCR reactions. In some cases, the amplicons were not clearly visible in the gel.

The GenomeWalker genomic libraries of S. ocellaris and B. coprophila were synthesised using the BD GenomeWalker Universal kit (BD Biosciences), following the manufacturer's instructions.

For the construction of the Sotra2 transgene, the tra-2 ORF of S. ocellaris was amplified by RT-PCR. The PCR reaction was performed using primers 5'SoT2 and 3'SoT2. The resulting amplicon was cloned in pUAST. The microinjections for generating the TDSo (UAS::Sotra-2 cDNA) transgenic D. melanogaster lines were performed by Genetic Services (Sudbury, MA, USA). To ascertain that each transgenic line was carrying the correct transgene, PCR on genomic DNA was used to amplify the whole transgene. The amplicons were then cloned and sequenced.

DNA sequencing

Sequencing was performed using an automated 377 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The analysis of DNA and protein sequences was performed using the programmes DNA Compare, Editview and BioEdit, and information in NCBI http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, BLAST http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST, FlyBase http://flybase.org/, CLUSTALW http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw and FASTA http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/fasta33/index.htm databases.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Oliver, D. Bopp, I. Guerrero, M. Calleja, F. Díaz-Benjumea, E. Sánchez-Herrero and S. Campuzano for providing Drosophila stocks. We are grateful to F. Díaz-Benjumea for bringing our attention to the GAL80 driver. This work was financed by grants BFU2005-03000 and BFU2008-00474 awarded to L. Sánchez by the D.G.I.C.Y.T.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas (C.S.I.C.), Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain
(2)
NEIKER-TEKNALIA, Berreaga 1, 48160-Derio, Vizcaya, Spain

References

  1. Sánchez L, Gorfinkiel N, Guerrero I: Sex determination and the development of the genital disc. Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science. Edited by: Gilbert LI, Iatrou K, Gill SS. 2005, Oxford: Elsevier Pergamon, 1: 1-38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell LR, Maine EM, Schedl P, Cline TW: Sex-lethal, a Drosophila sex determination switch gene, exhibits sex-specific RNA splicing and sequence similar to RNA binding proteins. Cell. 1988, 55: 1037-1046. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90248-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell LR, Horabin JI, Schedl P, Cline TW: Positive autoregulation of Sex-lethal by alternative splicing maintains the female determined state in Drosophila. Cell. 1991, 65: 229-239. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90157-T.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boggs RT, Gregor P, Idriss S, Belote JM, McKeown M: Regulation of sexual differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster via alternative splicing of RNA from the transformer gene. Cell. 1987, 50: 739-747. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90332-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Belote JM, McKeown M, Boggs RT, Ohkawa R, Sosnowski BA: The molecular genetics of transformer, a genetic switch-controlling sexual differentiation in Drosophila. Devel Genet. 1989, 10: 143-154. 10.1002/dvg.1020100304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Valcárcel J, Singh R, Zamore PD, Green MR: The protein Sex-lethal antagonizes the splicing factor U2AF to regulate alternative splicing of transformer pre-mRNA. Nature. 1993, 362: 171-175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hedley M, Maniatis T: Sex-specific splicing and polyadenylation of dsx pre-mRNA requires a sequence that binds specifically to tra-2 protein in vitro. Cell. 1991, 65: 579-586. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90090-L.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hertel KJ, Lynch KW, Hsiao EC, Liu EHT, Maniatis T: Structural and functional conservation of the Drosophila doublesex splicing enhancer repeat elements. RNA. 1996, 2: 969-981.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ryner LC, Baker BS: Regulation of doublesex pre-mRNA processing occurs by 3'-splice site activation. Genes Dev. 1991, 5: 2071-2085. 10.1101/gad.5.11.2071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tian M, Maniatis T: A splicing enhancer complex controls alternative splicing of doublesex pre-mRNA. Cell. 1993, 74: 105-114. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90298-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Burtis KC, Baker BS: Drosophila doublesex gene controls somatic sexual differentiation by producing alternatively spliced mRNAs encoding related sex-specific polypeptides. Cell. 1989, 56: 997-1010. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90633-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoshijima K, Inoue K, Higuchi I, Sakamoto H, Shimura Y: Control of doublesex alternative splicing by transformer and transformer-2 in Drosophila. Science. 1991, 252: 833-836. 10.1126/science.1902987.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sánchez L: Sex-determining mechanisms in insects. Int J Dev Biol. 2008, 52: 1059-1075.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gempe T, Beye M: Function and evolution of sex determination mechanisms, genes and pathways in insects. BioEssays. 2010, 33: 52-60. 10.1002/bies.201000043.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Verhulst EC, van de Zande L, Beukeboom LW: Insect sex determination: it all evolves around transformer. Curr Opin Gene Devel. 2010, 20: 1-8. 10.1016/j.gde.2010.01.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ruiz MF, Goday C, González P, Sánchez L: Molecular analysis and developmental expression of the Sex-lethal gene of Sciara ocellaris (Diptera Order, Nematocera Suborder). Gene Expr Patt. 2003, 3: 341-346. 10.1016/S1567-133X(03)00031-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Serna E, Gorab E, Ruiz MF, Goday C, Eirín-López JM, Sánchez L: The gene Sex-lethal of the Sciaridae family (Order Diptera, Suborder Nematocera) and its phylogeny in dipteran insects. Genetics. 2004, 168: 907-921. 10.1534/genetics.104.031278.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chandler D, McGuffin M, Piskur J, Yao J, Baker B, Mattox W: Evolutionary conservation of regulatory strategies for the sex determination factor transformer-2. Mol Cell Biol. 1997, 17: 2908-2919.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Burghardt G, Hediger M, Siegenthaler C, Moser M, Dübendorfer A, Bopp D: The transformer-2 gene in Musca domestica is required for selecting and maintaining the female pathway of development. Dev Genes Evol. 2005, 215: 165-176. 10.1007/s00427-004-0464-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gomulski LM, Dimopoulos G, Xi Z, Soares MB, Bonaldo MF, Malacrida AR, Gasperi G: Gene discovery in an invasive tephritid model pest species, the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. BMC Genetics. 2008, 9: 243-Google Scholar
  21. Salvemini M, Robertson M, Aronson B, Atkinson P, Polito C, Saccone G: Ceratitis capitata transformer-2 gene is required to establish and maintain the autoregulation of Cctra, the master gene for female sex determination. Int J Dev Biol. 2009, 53: 109-120. 10.1387/ijdb.082681ms.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarno F, Ruiz MF, Eirín-López JM, Perondini ALP, Selivon D, Sánchez L: The gene transformer-2 of Anastrepha fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) and its evolution in insects. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2010, 10: 140-10.1186/1471-2148-10-140.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Concha C, Scott MJ: Sexual development in Lucilia cuprina (Diptera, Calliphoridae) is controlled by the transformer gene. Genetics. 2009, 182: 785-789. 10.1534/genetics.109.100982.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Niu BL, Meng ZQ, Tao YZ, Lu SL, Weng HB, He LH, Shen WF: Cloning and alternative splicing analysis of Bombyx mori transformer-2 gene using silkworm EST database. Acta Biochim Biophys. 2005, 37: 728-736.Google Scholar
  25. Hediger M, Henggeler C, Meier N, Pérez R, Saccone G, Bopp D: Molecular characterization of the key switch F provides a basis for understanding the rapid divergence of the sex-determining pathway in the housefly. Genetics. 2010, 184: 155-170. 10.1534/genetics.109.109249.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dübendorfer A, Hediger M, Burghardt G, Bopp D: Musca domestica, a window on the evolution of sex-determining mechanisms in insects. Int J Dev Biol. 2002, 46: 75-79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Amrein H, Maniatis T, Nöthiger R: Alternatively spliced transcripts of the sex determining gene tra-2 of Drosophila encode functional proteins of different size. EMBO J. 1990, 9: 3619-3629.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mattox W, Palmer MJ, Baker BS: Alternative splicing of the sex determination gene transformer-2 is sex-specific in the germ line but not in the soma. Genes Dev. 1990, 4: 789-805. 10.1101/gad.4.5.789.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Dauwalder B, Amaya-Manzanares F, Mattox W: A human homologue of the Drosophila sex determination factor transformer-2 has conserved splicing regulatory functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 9004-9009. 10.1073/pnas.93.17.9004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. McAllister BF, McVean GAT: Neutral evolution of the sex-determining gene transformer in Drosophila. Genetics. 2000, 154: 1711-1720.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Qi J, Su S, McGuffin ME, Mattox W: Concentration dependent selection of targets by an SR splicing regulator results in tissue-specific RNA processing. Nucl Acids Res. 2006, 34: 6256-6263. 10.1093/nar/gkl755.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. St Pierre SE, Galindo MI, Couso JP, Thor S: Control of Drosophila imaginal disc development by rotund and roughened eye: differentially expressed transcripts of the same encoding functionally distinct zinc finger proteins. Development. 2002, 129: 1273-1281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramos-Onsins S, Segarra C, Rozas J, Aguadé M: Molecular and chromosomal phylogeny in the obscura group of Drosophila inferred from sequences of the rp49 gene region. Mol Phylo Evol. 1998, 9: 33-41. 10.1006/mpev.1997.0438.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Black DL: Mechanisms of alternative pre-messenger RNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003, 72: 291-336. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161720.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ruiz MF, Sánchez L: Effect of the gene transformer of Anastrepha on the somatic sexual development of Drosophila. Int J Dev Biol. 2010, 54: 627-633. 10.1387/ijdb.092917fr.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindsley DL, Zimm G: The genome of Drosophila melanogaster. 1992, San Diego, California. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  37. Cho Ng, Kopp A: Sex combs are important for male mating success in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 2008, 38: 195-201. 10.1007/s10519-008-9190-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. McGuire SE, Le PH, Osborn AJ, Matsumoto K, Davis RL: Spatiotemporal rescue of memory dysfunction in Drosophila. Science. 2003, 302: 1765-1768. 10.1126/science.1089035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Maniatis T, Fritsch F, Sambrook J: Molecular cloning. 1982, New York: Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Martín et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Developmental Biology

ISSN: 1471-213X

Contact us