- Research article
- Open Access
Hamster oocyte membrane potential and ion permeability vary with preantral cumulus cell attachment and developmental stage
© Emery et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2001
Received: 25 May 2001
Accepted: 10 October 2001
Published: 10 October 2001
In vitro maturation of mammalian oocytes is an area of great interest due to its potential application in the treatment of infertility. The morphological and physiological changes that occur during oocyte development are poorly understood, and further studies are needed investigating the physiological changes associated with oocyte maturation. In this study we evaluated the membrane potential and the sodium/potassium permeability ratio of oocytes acutely isolated, and cumulus-oocyte complexes in metaphase II and preantral follicle stages.
Intracellular electrical recordings revealed that cumulus-enclosed oocytes have a membrane potential significantly more negative at the preantral follicle stage than at metaphase II stage (-38.4 versus -19.7 mV, p < 0.0005). The membrane potential of the cumulus-free oocytes was not different between the preantral and metaphase II stages. The membrane potential of the cumulus cells forming preantral stage follicles was shown to be significantly different from that of the oocyte within the follicle (-28.6 versus -38.4 mV, p < 0.05). The sodium/potassium permeability measured in cumulus-enclosed oocytes at the preantral stage equaled a mean value of 0.33. The ratio was significantly lower when measured in oocytes denuded of cumulus cells or cumulus-enclosed metaphase II oocytes, 0.76, 0.79, 0.77 respectively (p < 0.001).
These data show a change in the membrane potential and Na+/K+ permeability ratio during ooycte development from the preantral stage oocyte to the metaphase II stage. We have also demonstrated a change in the preantral oocyte membrane potential when surrounding cumulus cells are removed; either due to membrane changes or loss of cumulus cells.
The functional unit of the mammalian ovary is the developing follicle. The follicle is comprised of somatic granulosa cells of two categories, thecal cells and cumulus cells, and a single gamete cell or oocyte. If the follicle continues to develop and does not undergo atresia, it will yield an oocyte competent to undergo fertilization and eventually form a new organism. Several changes in the morphology and physiology of the oocyte and surrounding cumulus cells occur at the different stages of oocyte development. These include dynamic changes in gap junctions , cytokine release , morphology , and membrane physiology . Improved understanding of the basic physiological changes of follicular development is necessary for the advancement of numerous areas of clinical research, including the potential to eventually mature competent oocytes in vitro for use in reproductive therapies such as in vitro fertilization (IVF).
The function of the granulosa cells, and specifically cumulus cells, as they pertain to oocyte maturation within the follicle is currently an area of intense interest. The presence of both gap junctional communication and autocrine/paracrine effect has been established . These avenues of communication may play a role in the maintenance of membrane properties, providing a means for initiating progression or imposing repression of the oocyte's meiotic stage. It is also possible for the opposite effect to be present; membrane function of the oocyte to have an effect on gap junction regulation and cytokine release.
The membrane physiology of the follicular cells includes the electrical properties of the cell, such as the membrane potential, cell coupling, ion channel activity and ion permeability. The membrane physiology of the oocyte and surrounding cumulus cells has been shown to change during germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD), a late developmental stage [6–8]. No studies have addressed the potential changes in membrane physiology from earlier stages (i.e. preantral follicles). Additionally, changes in membrane physiology at earlier stages of development in relation to the effects of attached cumulus cells have not been described. In order to address thisarea of follicular maturation, we have measured the membrane potential (Em) and permeability ratio of sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) (PNa/PK) of oocytes denuded of surrounding cells, and in complex together. Metaphase II (MII) and preantral follicle oocyte-cumulus complexes were used for evaluation.
Differences in the resting membrane potential (Rm) and the permeability ratio
OOCYTE Rm n = 10
-38.4 ± 4.5 mV+,++
-19.7 ± 0.8 mV
-19.7 ± 0.5 mV
-19.8 ± 0.5 mV
CUMULUS Rm n = 3
-28.6 ± 1.2 mV*
OOCYTE PNa/PK n = 10
0.33 ± 0.03**
0.76 ± 0.04
0.79 ± 0.014
0.77 ± 0.02
PNa/PK values in oocytes collected from preantral follicles varied whether cumulus cells were retained or removed, the values were 0.33 ± 0.03, 0.79 ± 0.014 respectively (p < 0.001, n = 4). Metaphase II oocytes did not show a change in PNa/PK whether the cumulus cells were retained or stripped away. PNa/PK was statistically different when compared across maturational stage if cumulus cells were present (p < 0.001 n = 4), but if removed the ratio of PNa/PK became closer to 1.0 and no longer varied between stages (Table 1).
In this study, PNa/PK and Em, were evaluated in early and late oocyte development. These data indicate a significant change in PNa/PK and Em between oocytes collected at the metaphase II stage and those from preantral follicles, and the effect from removal of cumulus cells. First, cumulus intact oocytes were compared to denuded oocytes to determine the amount of regulation from cumulus cells in a stage dependant manner. Secondly, comparisons made between two chosen stages of oocyte development (preantral and metaphase II) determined the amount of change in both variables tested over a broad maturational time. These stages were chosen to look at the early stages of oocyte maturation compared to late in an effort to bridge the gap present in the current literature, in which the changes occurring at transitions from GV to MII have been studied.
These data indicate that while Em of denuded oocytes at the MII stage were no different than cumulus enclosed MII oocytes, denuded oocytes from preantral follicles versus cumulus enclosed of the same stage did vary. Furthermore, if cumulus was removed from preantral stage oocytes the membrane potential became more positive and no longer significantly different than metaphase II oocytes, regardless of cumulus cell attachment. While present, heterologous gap junctions between the oocyte and cumulus cells may play a key role in the maintenance of oocyte membrane potential. Previous studies in several species have shown functional gap junctions in the cumulus-oocyte complex present during many stages and required for meiotic resumption [ for review]. When the cumulus cells begin to undergo cumulus expansion, cytoplasmic extensions protruding through the zona pellucida contacting the oolema are retracted, thus breaking heterologous gap junction communication. The loss of gap junctions during cumulus expansion could account for the shift in oocyte membrane potential observed between early and late maturation stages. The mechanism could be either direct reduction in ion diffusion through gap junctions, or indirectly by causing the oocyte to adjust oolemma properties in response to loss of a cumulus derived signal.
The data presented here support previous studies (11) and could explain the change in membrane potential seen when cumulus cells are chemically removed, as in the case of the preantral oocyte experiments or physiologically removed as in the case of the metaphase II oocyte. Work done by Gilula, Epstein and Beers, 1978 describes a similar conclusion, ionic coupling of cumulus cells and oocytes decrease to zero from preovulatory to postovulatory specimens . Other work from the pig model shows a loss of gap junctions in the same maturational time, progression from metaphase I to metaphase II .
The presence of gap junctions is well documented but the regulation of these connexin pores is not well defined in any model. Thus it is interesting to note the difference in the membrane potential of the cumulus cells and oocyte at the preantral stage. This indicates that while the two cells are highly electrically coupled before ovulation , they maintain a different membrane potential.
When the Em and PNa/PK of denuded and cumulus-intact oocytes were compared within their maturational stage, either preantral or MII, there was a significant difference during the preantral stage (p < 0.0001, 0.001 respectively) but not at MII. This substantiates the above importance of cumulus regulation. Grenfield, Hackett, and Linden investigated Xenopus oocyte K+ currents in 1990 to reveal that an outward K+ current in response to cAMP is abolished by inhibition of gap junctions or removal of cumulus cells , effecting the permeation of the cell to K+ and substantiating these data. The loss of gap junctions in Grenfield's paper caused the outward potassium current to decrease, just as the PNa/PK value became closer to one in our studies.
Results for the membrane potential of MII oocytes is similar to values obtained by Racowsky and Saterlie . This value (-19.7 ± 0.8 mV) from the cumulus-enclosed oocyte is less negative than the potential we report from oocytes removed from preantral oocytes (-38.4 ± 4.5 mV, p < 0.001). Racowsky and Saterlie have also investigated the importance of changes in oocyte and cumulus cell membrane potential during the resumption of meiosis and progression to metaphase II . The aforementioned authors indicate that a shift in Em to a more positive value does not seem to be requisite for this progression. Our data suggest there is a requisite change in membrane potential from the early stage to late stage oocytes. The change in oocyte membrane potential and PNa/PKwe describe here suggest there is a requisite change in oocyte development between the preantral and metaphase II stage. This alteration in membrane potential may not be necessary for progression from germinal vesicle to MII, but it is likely that it is required to produce an oocyte competent for fertilization. This may be a more gradual change or a multi-step rise in the Em and decrease in PNa/PK from preantral to GVBD.
Materials and methods
Human Tubal Fluid (HTF) media is the standard for handling oocytes in the clinical setting and thus was chosen for manipulation of the cells prior to electrical recordings. HEPES buffered RSS (124 mM NaCl, 2.6 mM KCl, 2.7 mM CaCl, 1.7 mM MgSO4, 1.0 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM HEPES) was used as the perfusion media in recording Em and as the control solution in calculation of PNa/PK. The use of RSS allowed manipulation of the ionic constituents of the perfusion media during electrical recording. To verify that RSS was acceptable for use with oocytes, Em recordings from oocytes in HTF media were compared to cells bathed in RSS (data not shown). Reciprocal dilution of sodium with potassium was done in RSS by replacing molar concentrations of sodium salts with the potassium equivalent.
Preantral oocyte preparation
Preantral follicles were collected from Syrian Golden Hamsters euthanized by cervical dislocation followed by removal of the ovaries into artificial human tubal fluid medium (HTF). Tissue preparation was adapted from previous work  and experience in this laboratory. Use of this technique has produced viable follicles for physiological studies previously. Tissues were minced with a scalpel and forceps in a sterile watch glass containing HTF with 3 mg/ml collagenase, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Lewis, MO and 0.1 mg/ml DNAse, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Lewis, MO. The minced tissue was then transferred to a 60 × 15 mm petri dish, Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ. Tissue was allowed to dissociate in the collagenase containing media for 10 minutes. The separation of follicles within the tissue was facilitated by repeatedly aspirating the sample through a glass pasture pipette during the collagenase treatment. Follicles were visualized using a low power dissection microscope and transferred into fresh HTF media with 10% BSA, w/v Sigma Chemical Co., St. Lewis, MO, using a glass pipette and washed three times. Small preantral follicles with oocytes having a diameter less than or equal to 60 μm were ultimately chosen for evaluation, transferred to HTF and maintained at 37°C, 5%CO2 until transfer to perfusion dish. When oocytes free of cumulus cells were needed, the same protocol was followed with adjustment of the enzyme treatment timeto 15 minutes and a small-bore pipette (I.D. 100 μm) was used to strip the surrounding cells from the oocyte.
Metaphase II oocyte collection
Electrical recording and setup for oocyte studies
Cells were bathed with a HEPES buffered Ringers Salt Solution in a perfusion chamber while held in place with a conventional glass micro-tool manufactured for holding oocytes during intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and a controlled pressure device. The oocyte was immobilized for impalement by pressing the cell against the bottom of the dish while being held to the holding pipette with slight negative pressure. Solutions at room temperature (22°C) were changed as needed by a gravity feed perfusion system attached to a coverslip bottom perfusion well. The effects of tissue degradation due to incubation at 22°C and successful impalement were controlled for by monitoring the oocyte morphology and successfully returning to the beginning Em when the experiment was finished or continued measurement of membrane potential without any significant deviation for at least one minute
Electrical recording and setup for cumulus studies
Cumulus cells were recorded from in-place on the preantral cumulus-oocyte complex using the same holding system as described in the above text. Cumulus cells on the surface of the follicle within two to three layers of the oocyte were recorded from by the same method as used for the oocyte. The Em was not considered unless the value was steady for at least one minute after impalement.
Calculation of PNa/PK
- Wright CS, Becker DL, Lin JS, Warner AE, Hadry K: Stage-specific and differential expression of gap junctions in the mouse ovary: connexin-specific roles in follicular regulation. Reprod. 2001, 121(1): 77-88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kol S, Adashi EY: Intraovarian factors regulating ovarian function. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 1995, 7(3): 209-213.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeilmaker GH, Vermeiden JP, Verhamme CM, Van Vliet AC: Observations on rat and mouse oocyte maturation in vivo and in vitro: morphology and physiology. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1974, 4(1): 15-24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okamoto H, Takahashi K, Yamashita N: Ionic currents through the membrane of the mammalian oocyte and their comparison with those in the tunicate and sea urchin. J. Physiol. 1977, 267: 465-495.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Canipari R: Oocyte-granulosa cell interactions. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2000, 6(3): 279-289.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mattioli M, Barboni B, Bacci ML, Seren E: Maturation of pig oocytes: observations on membrane potential. Biol. Reprod. 1990, 43: 318-322.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Downs SM: The influence of glucose, cumulus cells, and metabolic coupling on ATP levels and meiotic control in the isolated mouse oocyte. Devlop. Biol. 1995, 167: 502-512. 10.1006/dbio.1995.1044.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McCullough DH, Levitan H: Rabbit oocyte maturation: changes of membrane resistance, capacitance, and the frequency of spontaneous transient depolarizations. Develop. Biol. 1987, 120: 162-169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Racowsky C, Satterlie RA: Decreases in hetreologus metabolic and dye coupling, but not in electrical coupling, accompany meiotic resumption in hamster oocyte-cumulus complexes. Euro. J. Cell. Biol. 1987, 43: 283-292.Google Scholar
- Racowsky C, Satterlie RA: Metabolic, fluorescent dye and electrical coupling between hamster oocytes and cumulus cells during meiotic maturation in vivo and in vitro. Devel. Biol. 1985, 108: 191-202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wert SE, Larsen WJ: Meiotic resumption and gap junction modulation in the cultured rat cumulus-oocyte complex. Gamete Res. 1989, 22: 143-162.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilula NB, Epstein ML, Beers WH: Cell-to-cell communication and ovulation. A study of the cumulus-oocyte complex. J. Cell Biol. 1978, 78: 58-75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki H, Jeong S-B, Yang X: Dynamic changed of cumulus-oocyte cell communication during in vitro maturation of porcine oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 63: 723-729.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenfield LJ, Hackett JT, Linden J: Xenopus oocyte K+ current. III. Phorbol esters and pH regulate current at gap junctions. Am. J. Physiol. 1990, 259 (Cell Physiol. 28): C792-C800.Google Scholar
- Roy SK, Greenwald GS: An enzymatic method for dissociation of intact follicles from the hamster ovary: histological and quantitative aspects. Biol. Reprod. 1985, 32: 203-215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown HM, Saunders JH: Cation and anion sequences in dark-adapted Balanus photoreceptor. J. Gen. Physiol. 1977, 70: 531-543.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mullins LJ, Noda K: The influence of sodium-free solutions on the membrane potential of frog muscle fibers. J. Gen. Physiol. 1963, 43: 117-132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.