PAPC and the Wnt5a/Ror2 pathway control the invagination of the otic placode in Xenopus
© Jung et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 17 February 2011
Accepted: 10 June 2011
Published: 10 June 2011
Paraxial protocadherin (PAPC) plays a crucial role in morphogenetic movements during gastrulation and somitogenesis in mouse, zebrafish and Xenopus. PAPC influences cell-cell adhesion mediated by C-Cadherin. A putative direct adhesion activity of PAPC is discussed. PAPC also promotes cell elongation, tissue separation and coordinates cell mass movements. In these processes the signaling function of PAPC in activating RhoA/JNK and supporting Wnt-11/PCP by binding to frizzled 7 (fz7) is important.
Here we demonstrate by loss of function experiments in Xenopus embryos that PAPC regulates another type of morphogenetic movement, the invagination of the ear placode. Knockdown of PAPC by antisense morpholinos results in deformation of the otic vesicle without altering otocyst marker expression. Depletion of PAPC could be rescued by full-length PAPC, constitutive active RhoA and by the closely related PCNS but not by classical cadherins. Also the cytoplasmic deletion mutant M-PAPC, which influences cell adhesion, does not rescue the PAPC knockdown. Interestingly, depletion of Wnt5a or Ror2 which are also expressed in the otocyst phenocopies the PAPC morphant phenotype.
PAPC signaling via RhoA and Wnt5a/Ror2 activity are required to keep cells aligned in apical-basal orientation during invagination of the ear placode. Since neither the cytoplasmic deletion mutant M-PAPC nor a classical cadherin is able to rescue loss of PAPC we suggest that the signaling function of the protocadherin rather than its role as modulator of cell-cell adhesion is required during invagination of the ear placode.
Paraxial protocadherin PAPC stands out among the cadherin superfamily members by its binding partners, signaling activity and specific expression pattern. It is highly conserved among vertebrates and functional homology has been observed in mouse, zebrafish and Xenopus. The human ortholog is named PCDH8 (protocadherin 8) and localized on chromosome 13 . PCDH8 is found repressed in many breast tumors by mutations or epigenetic silencing, which results in up-regulation of proliferation and invasion . Arcadlin, the rat ortholog of PAPC, is expressed during brain development in the hippocampus, the auditory, the visual and the limbic systems . Arcadlin binds to N-Cadherin and promotes its endocytosis thereby controlling the dentritic spine number .
In Xenopus, xPAPC was identified in a screen for Spemann organizer genes . Functional studies revealed its significance in mass cell movements during gastrulation. xPAPC is essential to keep the involuting mesoderm separated from the overlying neuroectoderm so that the Brachet's cleft is formed . In addition xPAPC coordinates the mesoderm cells to converge towards the dorsal midline . Both activities depend on the ability of xPAPC to activate the small GTPase RhoA. The latter might be supported by xANR5, a cytoplasmic binding partner of xPAPC, which regulates tissue separation and cell protrusion formation in gastrulation . The extracellular domain of xPAPC was shown to decrease C-Cadherin mediated cell-cell adhesion by a mechanism, which is not yet understood. This activity of xPAPC does not depend on frizzled-7 (xFz7) .
PAPC is also required for the segmentation of somites. The latter has been reported for Xenopus, mouse and zebrafish [10–12]. Zebrafish PAPC is under control of the T-box factor Tbx16; its mutant spadetail shows reduced zPAPC expression. The spadetail gastrulation phenotype resembles the phenotype observed after expression of dominant-negative zPAPC [13, 14]. In Xenopus Medina et al.  have demonstrated that xPAPC is linked to the non-canonical Wnt-PCP pathway because its extracellular domain interacts with xFz7. In addition, xPAPC antagonizes the inhibitory influence of sprouty on Wnt-PCP signaling by binding to it . Apart from being regulated by activin/BVg1, nodal and β-catenin [6, 16, 17], xPAPC expression is under control of the non-canonical Wnt5a/Ror2 pathway . Importantly, only depletion of Wnt5a or Ror2 mimics the xPAPC-loss-of-function phenotype in gastrulation movement while depletion of the other regulators strongly affects mesoderm induction and patterning.
Apart from the Spemann organizer and somatic mesoderm xPAPC is expressed in the developing inner ear . The development of the inner ear in vertebrates involves morphogenetic movements, which include invagination of the otic placode, delamination of the neuroblasts and reshaping the otocyst into otic structures like semicircular canals. Important signaling pathways involved in the induction of the otic placode have been identified in mouse, chicken, zebrafish and Xenopus [20, 21]. Wnt-PCP signaling and protocadherins are required in the late period of stereocilia formation during differentiation of the organ Corti (reviewed in [22, 23]). However, little is known about the role of protocadherins and non-canonical Wnt-signaling in the morphogenetic movements during otocyst and neuroblast formation.
Here we demonstrate by antisense morpholino injections that xPAPC signaling rather than its adhesive function is required for proper invagination of the otic placodal epithelium. Constitutive active RhoA and PCNS, the closest relative to xPAPC, rescued depletion of xPAPC whereas classical cadherins and M-PAPC did not. Interestingly, depletion of Wnt5a and Ror2, both, phenocopied xPAPC loss of function.
XPAPC is expressed with Wnt5a, Ror2 and xFz7 in the otic anlage
xPAPC is regulated by the non-canonical Wnt5a/Ror2 pathway, which cooperates with the Wnt/PCP pathway . Therefore we tested whether key components of these pathways are also expressed in the otic anlage. Wnt5a, Ror2 and xFz7 were found expressed in the otic vesicle but also in the eye and neural crest (Figure 1E, F, G).
Knockdown of xPAPC results in malformation of the otocyst epithelium altering localization of adhesion proteins and aPKC
xPAPC function in inner ear development can be replaced by the protocadherin PCNS but not by classical cadherins
xPAPC depletion is rescued by RhoA but not by disheveled
Wnt5a/Ror2 depletion phenocopies the xPAPC morphant phenotype
xPAPC is required for proper invagination of the otic placode
Building an ear vesicle starting from a thickening ectodermal placode by forming a pit, which closes and separates from the ectoderm, implies multiple changes in cellular behavior. Here we report, that knockdown of xPAPC leads to irregular folding of the otic epithelium and failures in cavity formation. Induction of the otic placode, compartmentalization and neuroblast differentiation was not affected. This is in contrast to an earlier report by Hu et al.  who injected dominant-negative forms of xPAPC and showed the complete loss of the otic markers Tbx2 and Sox9 and an aggregation of pigmented cells instead. This phenotype is not surprising since Chen and Gumbiner  demonstrated that expression of M-PAPC similar to overexpression of full-length PAPC led to downregulation in C-Cadherin mediated adhesion. C-Cadherin is the most abundant and ubiquitously expressed cadherin  in the early Xenopus embryo. Thus, ectopic expression of M-PAPC might interfere with C-Cadherin in a broad range of tissue formation, which indirectly might affect otic placode formation.
Defects in otocyst formation in the presence of quite normal patterning have been observed in chicken by dominant-negative expression of spalt4/Sall4 mutant  or by Sox9 knockout in mice . However, instead of an up-folded otic epithelium, loss of these transcription factors resulted in the formation of smaller ear vesicles. Moreover, ectopic expression of spalt4/salI led to super numerous ear vesicle formations, which was not observed by overexpression of xPAPC . Interestingly, both spalt4/sall4 and Sox9 regulate EphA4 expression [31, 32]. Moreover, in Sox9 knockout mice, Col2a1 was lost and cell-cell contacts in the otic epithelium were dramatically reduced . Gata3 knockout in mice also resulted in deformed ear vesicles; either they were found small or split into two. Microarray studies displayed a deregulation of EphA4, EphB4, connexin26 (Gjb2) and ostepontin (SSP1) . All these reports on transcription factors point to an important role of cell adhesion regulation during ear vesicle formation. The regulation of PAPC expression seems to be evolutionary conserved. T-box proteins, bHLH proteins of the Mesp family, and Lim1 activate its expression [5, 10, 11, 13, 34]. Importantly, activated notch (ICD) and lunatic fringe repress PAPC [10, 11]. The inhibitory effect of notch signaling might explain the lack of PAPC expression in the ventrolateral part of the otocyst (see Figure 1B, C), where the neuroblasts delaminate. In chicken lunatic fringe is expressed in this region at corresponding stage .
xPAPC is not primarily required as regulator of cadherin-mediated adhesion in ear vesicle formation
Initially, a direct adhesive function was conferred to PAPC based on homotypic cell sorting experiments . If xPAPC would be required for mediating homophilic cell-adhesion during otic placode invagination, expressing a classical cadherin should restore the weakening of cell adhesion in the morphants. None of the so far tested cadherins was able to rescue vesicle malformation (Figure 5E). Therefore we can exclude that xPAPC is needed to enforce cell-cell adhesion during ear vesicle formation. We also deny a role of PAPC in lowering C-Cadherin mediated adhesion, a mechanism suggested by Chen and Gumbiner , because this would suppose that M-PAPC is able to rescue PAPC depletion. This was not observed (Figure 5B). We also could not detect a reduction in E-, C- or XB-Cadherin, β-Catenin or fibronectin immunostaining. Strikingly, the protocadherin PCNS, which is able to rescue PAPC depletion, has been shown to possess little cell-sorting activity in dissociation-reaggregation experiments . The latter indicates that PAPC and PCNS share some other important activities rather than regulating cell adhesion.
The signaling function of xPAPC and Wnt5a/Ror2 are needed to build up an otocyst
PAPC depletion is rescued by ca RhoA pointing to the signaling function, which is required in otocyst formation. This is in line with the observation that the membrane anchored cytoplasmic domain (C-PAPCgap) shows some rescue ability. The discrepancy in the rescue ability of the full-length form might be explained by the binding of the extracellular domain of PAPC to xFz7 . xFz7 is able to activate β-catenin dependent and independent Wnt-signaling cascades . Interestingly, we could not rescue PAPC depletion in inner ear development by expressing full-length dsh or different dsh constructs, by which PCP/Wnt or β-catenin/Wnt-signaling specifically is activated  (summarized in ). Knockdown of xFz7 also did not result in an otic vesicle phenotype (data not shown) although the receptor is present in this tissue. We assume that additional members of the Fz-receptor family are expressed and might act redundantly as shown in mice .
Wnt5a or Ror2 depletion phenocopied the xPAPC morphant phenotype, a misfolded vesicle and artificially deposited fibronectin and C-Cadherin. Wnt5a and Ror2 morphants showed a reduction but not a complete loss of PAPC in the otic placode visualized by ISH. This could be due to canonical Wnt-signaling, which is present during early inner ear development [20, 38]. Apart from Wnt5a/Ror2 PAPC expression is also driven by β-catenin/Wnt signaling . Wnt5a and Ror2 are expressed in the otic vesicle. Although Ror2 and xPAPC morphants showed similarities in the otocyst phenotype xPAPC RNA injections did not rescue the Ror2 morphants. This could rely on the multiple functions of Ror2 in signaling (reviewed in ). Ror proteins share with Frizzled receptors the CRD domain which is responsible for Wnt binding. Ror2 has been reported to inhibit canonical Wnt signaling by sequestering Wnt-1 and Wnt-3. However, in other studies Ror2 was shown to promote Wnt-1 activity. Ror2 also influences filopodia formation and cytoskeletal re-arrangements independent of the CRD-domain and Wnt-binding. Thus, Ror2 activity is context dependent. In mouse inner ear development, for example, Ror2 can only activate PCP-signaling in collaboration with the glycoprotein Cthrc1 .
In regard to the expression profiles of Wnts, Frizzled-receptors and Wnt-antagonists known from the avian otic primordium  a more detailed knowledge of regional differences in the amphibian otocyst is necessary for understanding the Ror2 function. The fate map of mass cell movement in chick otic cup closure , instead, asks for an investigation of non-canonical Wnt-signaling in this process.
The similarity in PAPC and Wnt5a/Ror2 depletion phenotypes in Xenopus gastrulation  and otocyst formation underlines their conjunction in morphogenetic movements. In this context the signaling function of PAPC in activating the small GTPase RhoA is crucial. As in convergent extension movement  and tissue separation  xPAPC depletion in the otic placode is rescued by ca RhoA (this paper).
The protocadherin xPAPC is essential in maintaining proper orientation and alignment of epithelial cells during invagination of the otic placode and cavitation of the otocyst. This morphogentic movement needs xPAPC as activator of RhoA but not as modulator of cadherin mediated cell adhesion. The significance of the signaling part is further supported by the observation that also Wnt5a and Ror2 are required in this morphogenetic process. Furthermore, the non-adhesive PCNS is able to replace xPAPC. How far PCNS can take over all functions of PAPC remains to be answered.
Plasmids, constructs, in vitro transcription
Capped mRNAs were synthesized from linearized templates by using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE kit (Ambion). The antisense probes for in situ hybridization were labeled with digoxigenin by using DIG RNA labeling kit (Roche). C-PAPC and C-PAPCgap in pCS2+ were a kind gift of H. Steinbeisser (Heidelberg).
The used antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (Gene Tools LLC, Philomath, USA) were described previously: PAPC Mo1, PAPC Mo2 [6, 7], Wnt5a Mo, Ror2 Mo . The injected Mo amounts are 1.6 pmol XWnt5a Mo and XRor2 Mo. PAPC Morpholinos were injected as a mixture of 1.5 pmol each. The standard control Morpholino was used as negative control. The successful protein synthesis was detected by in vitro transcription and translation kit (TNT®, Promega) carried out in accordance with manufacturer's instructions.
Embryo treatment and in situ hybridization
Eggs were fertilized, cultured and injected as previously described . Embryos were injected into one blastomere at the 2-cell stage or in 2 adjacent cells (ventral and dorsal) at the animal half at 16-cell stage. 4 pg Dextran, 125 pg mRNA encoding for GFP or 40 pg β-Galactosidase RNA were used as lineage tracer. Embryos were fixed in MEMFA (0.1 M MOPS pH 7.2, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgSO4, 3.7% formaldehyde). After fixation embryos were stained for β-Galactosidase activity. Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed according to previously described protocols using the digoxigenin/alkaline phosphatase detection system (Roche) .
After in situ hybridization embryos were embedded in 2% agarose and sections were obtained by using the Leica VT 1000S vibratome. Sections were blocked for 2 h in 1% BSA/1% horse serum (PAA laboratories GmbH; Invitrogen) in APBST (2.7 mM KCl, 0.15 mM KH2PO4, 103 mM NaCl, 0.7 mM Na2PO4, pH 7.5, 0.1% Tween 20). Overnight incubation of the primary antibodies anti-fibronectin (6D9, undiluted supernatant, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), anti-aPKC (1:200, C-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-C-Cadherin (6D6, 1:50, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) was followed by anti-rabbit Cy3 or anti-mouse Cy3 (1:400, Dianova) for 1 h at RT. The injected side was identified by immunostaining with anti-GFP antibody (1:100, Invitrogen).
Quantification of epithelial cell alignment was performed by measuring the angles of the nuclei to the mediolateral axis in transverse sections. For each type of injection 5 embryos with 10 cells per otocyst section were counted. The values were displayed in rose diagrams.
Whole mount immunostaining was performed as described in . The 3A10 monoclonal antibody (developed by Thomas Jessell et al.) was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank developed under the auspices of the NICHD and maintained by The University of Iowa, Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA 52242.
We are thankful to Tom Sargent for providing us with the PCNS clone and Herbert Steinbeisser for C-PAPC and C-PAPCgap clones. The Tbx1 and RunX1 probes were kindly provided by Michael Kühl and Thomas Hollemann, respectively. We thank Christine van Lishout for technical assistance. B. J. was financed by a stipend of the Landesgraduiertenfoerderung of Baden-Wuerttemberg. This work was funded by a DFG grant to DW. We acknowledge support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Open Access Publishing Fund of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
- Strehl S, Glatt K, Liu QM, Glatt H, Lalande M: Characterization of two novel protocadherins (PCDH8 and PCDH9) localized on human chromosome 13 and mouse chromosome 14. Genomics. 1998, 53: 81-89. 10.1006/geno.1998.5467.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu JS, Koujak S, Nagase S, Li CM, Su T, Wang X, Keniry M, Memeo L, Rojtman A, Mansukhani M, Hibshoosh H, Tycko B, Parsons R: PCDH8, the human homolog of PAPC, is a candidate tumor suppressor of breast cancer. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 4657-4665. 10.1038/onc.2008.101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamagata K, Andreasson KI, Sugiura H, Maru E, Dominique M, Irie Y, Miki N, Hayashi Y, Yoshioka M, Kaneko K, Kato H, Worley PF: Arcadlin is a neural activity-regulated cadherin involved in long term potentiation. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 19473-1979. 10.1074/jbc.274.27.19473.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yasuda S, Tanaka H, Sugiura H, Okamura K, Sakaguchi T, Tran U, Takemiya T, Mizoguchi A, Yagita Y, Sakurai T, De Robertis EM, Yamagata K: Activity-induced protocadherin arcadlin regulates dendritic spine number by triggering N-cadherin endocytosis via TAO2beta and p38 MAP kinases. Neuron. 2007, 56: 456-471. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.020.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim SH, Yamamoto A, Bouwmeester T, Agius E, Robertis EM: The role of paraxial protocadherin in selective adhesion and cell movements of the mesoderm during Xenopus gastrulation. Development. 1998, 125: 4681-4690.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Medina A, Swain RK, Kuerner KM, Steinbeisser H: Xenopus paraxial protocadherin has signaling functions and is involved in tissue separation. EMBO J. 2004, 23: 3249-3258. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600329.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Unterseher F, Hefele JA, Giehl K, De Robertis EM, Wedlich D, Schambony A: Paraxial protocadherin coordinates cell polarity during convergent extension via Rho A and JNK. EMBO J. 2004, 23: 3259-3269. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600332.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chung HA, Yamamoto TS, Ueno N: ANR5, an FGF target gene product, regulates gastrulation in Xenopus. Curr Biol. 2007, 17: 932-939. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen X, Gumbiner BM: Paraxial protocadherin mediates cell sorting and tissue morphogenesis by regulating C-cadherin adhesion activity. J Cell Biol. 2006, 174: 301-313. 10.1083/jcb.200602062.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim SH, Jen WC, De Robertis EM, Kintner C: The protocadherin PAPC establishes segmental boundaries during somitogenesis in xenopus embryos. Curr Biol. 2000, 10: 821-830. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00580-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rhee J, Takahashi Y, Saga Y, Wilson-Rawls J, Rawls A: The protocadherin papc is involved in the organization of the epithelium along the segmental border during mouse somitogenesis. Dev Biol. 2003, 254: 248-261. 10.1016/S0012-1606(02)00085-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Henry CA, Poage CT, McCarthy MB, Campos-Ortega J, Cooper MS: Regionally autonomous segmentation within zebrafish presomitic mesoderm. Zebrafish. 2005, 2: 7-18. 10.1089/zeb.2005.2.7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto A, Amacher SL, Kim SH, Geissert D, Kimmel CB, De Robertis EM: Zebrafish paraxial protocadherin is a downstream target of spadetail involved in morphogenesis of gastrula mesoderm. Development. 1998, 125: 3389-3397.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muyskens JB, Kimmel CB: Tbx16 cooperates with Wnt11 in assembling the zebrafish organizer. Mech Dev. 2007, 124: 35-42. 10.1016/j.mod.2006.09.003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Janicki P, Koster I, Berger CD, Wenzl C, Grosshans J, Steinbeisser H: Xenopus Paraxial Protocadherin regulates morphogenesis by antagonizing Sprouty. Genes Dev. 2008, 22: 878-883. 10.1101/gad.452908.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wessely O, Kim JI, Geissert D, Tran U, De Robertis EM: Analysis of Spemann organizer formation in Xenopus embryos by cDNA macroarrays. Dev Biol. 2004, 269: 552-566. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.01.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lou X, Li S, Wang J, Ding X: Activin/nodal signaling modulates XPAPC expression during Xenopus gastrulation. Dev Dyn. 2008, 237: 683-691. 10.1002/dvdy.21456.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schambony A, Wedlich D: Wnt-5A/Ror2 regulate expression of XPAPC through an alternative noncanonical signaling pathway. Dev Cell. 2007, 12: 779-792. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.02.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu RY, Xu P, Chen YL, Lou X, Ding X: The role of Paraxial Protocadherin in Xenopus otic placode development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 345: 239-247. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barald KF, Kelley MW: From placode to polarization: new tunes in inner ear development. Development. 2004, 131: 4119-4130. 10.1242/dev.01339.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park BY, Saint-Jeannet JP: Hindbrain-derived Wnt and Fgf signals cooperate to specify the otic placode in Xenopus. Dev Biol. 2008, 324: 108-121. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.09.009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dabdoub A, Kelley MW: Planar cell polarity and a potential role for a Wnt morphogen gradient in stereociliary bundle orientation in the mammalian inner ear. J Neurobiol. 2005, 64: 446-457. 10.1002/neu.20171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Müller U: Cadherins and mechanotransduction by hair cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008, 20: 557-566. 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.06.004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heller N, Brändli AW: Xenopus Pax-2 displays multiple splice forms during embryogenesis and pronephric kidney development. Mech Dev. 1997, 69: 83-104. 10.1016/S0925-4773(97)00158-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bayramov AV, Martynova NY, Eroshkin FM, Ermakova GV, Zaraisky AG: The homeodomain-containing transcription factor X-nkx-5.1 inhibits expression of the homeobox gene Xanf-1 during the Xenopus laevis forebrain development. Mech Dev. 2004, 121: 1425-1441. 10.1016/j.mod.2004.08.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schlosser G, Northcutt RG: Development of neurogenic placodes in Xenopus laevis. J Comp Neurol. 2000, 418: 121-146. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(20000306)418:2<121::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rangarajan J, Luo T, Sargent TD: PCNS: a novel protocadherin required for cranial neural crest migration and somite morphogenesis in Xenopus. Dev Biol. 2006, 295: 206-218. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.03.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Habas R, Dawid IB, He X: Coactivation of Rac and Rho by Wnt/Frizzled signaling is required for vertebrate gastrulation. Genes Dev. 2003, 17: 295-309. 10.1101/gad.1022203.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gao C, Chen YG: Dishevelled: The hub of Wnt signaling. Cell Signal. 2010, 22: 717-727. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.11.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Müller HA, Kühl M, Finnemann S, Schneider S, van der Poel SZ, Hausen P, Wedlich D: Xenopus cadherins: the maternal pool comprises distinguishable members of the family. Mech Dev. 1994, 47: 213-223. 10.1016/0925-4773(94)90040-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barembaum M, Bronner-Fraser M: Spalt4 mediates invagination and otic placode gene expression in cranial ectoderm. Development. 2007, 134: 3805-3814. 10.1242/dev.02885.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barrionuevo F, Naumann A, Bagheri-Fam S, Speth V, Taketo MM, Scherer G, Neubuser A: Sox9 is required for invagination of the otic placode in mice. Dev Biol. 2008, 317: 213-224. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lilleväli K, Haugas M, Matilainen T, Pussinen C, Karis A, Salminen M: Gata3 is required for early morphogenesis and Fgf10 expression during otic development. Mech Dev. 2006, 123: 415-429. 10.1016/j.mod.2006.04.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hukriede NA, Tsang TE, Habas R, Khoo PL, Steiner K, Weeks DL, Tam PP, Dawid IB: Conserved requirement of Lim1 function for cell movements during gastrulation. Dev Cell. 2003, 4: 83-94. 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00398-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fekete DM, Wu DK: Revisiting cell fate specification in the inner ear. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002, 12: 35-42. 10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00287-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Medina A, Reintsch W, Steinbeisser H: Xenopus frizzled 7 can act in canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways: implications on early patterning and morphogenesis. Mech Dev. 2000, 92: 227-237. 10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00240-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Guo N, Nathans J: The role of Frizzled3 and Frizzled6 in neural tube closure and in the planar polarity of inner-ear sensory hair cells. J Neurosci. 2006, 26: 2147-2156. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4698-05.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sienknecht UJ, Fekete DM: Mapping of Wnt, frizzled, and Wnt inhibitor gene expression domains in the avian otic primordium. J Comp Neurol. 2009, 517: 751-764. 10.1002/cne.22169.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green JL, Kuntz SG, Sternberg PW: Ror receptor tyrosine kinases: orphans no more. Trends Cell Biol. 2008, 18: 536-544. 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.08.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto S, Nishimura O, Misaki K, Nishita M, Minami Y, Yonemura S, Tarui H, Sasaki H: Cthrc1 selectively activates the planar cell polarity pathway of Wnt signaling by stabilizing the Wnt-receptor complex. Dev Cell. 2008, 15: 23-36. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.05.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brigande JV, Iten LE, Fekete DM: A fate map of chick otic cup closure reveals lineage boundaries in the dorsal otocyst. Dev Biol. 2000, 227: 256-270. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9914.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koenig SF, Lattanzio R, Mansperger K, Rupp RA, Wedlich D, Gradl D: Autoregulation of XTcf-4 depends on a Lef/Tcf site on the XTcf-4 promoter. Genesis. 2008, 46: 81-86. 10.1002/dvg.20363.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schuff M, Rossner A, Wacker SA, Donow C, Gessert S, Knöchel W: FoxN3 is required for craniofacial and eye development of Xenopus laevis. Dev Dyn. 2007, 236: 226-239. 10.1002/dvdy.21007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.