Identification of genes differentially expressed in dorsal and ventral chick midbrain during early Development

Background During the development of the central nervous system (CNS), patterning processes along the dorsoventral (DV) axis of the neural tube generate different neuronal subtypes. As development progresses these neurons are arranged into functional units with varying cytoarchitecture, such as laminae or nuclei for efficient relaying of information. Early in development ventral and dorsal regions are similar in size and structure. Different proliferation rates and cell migration patterns are likely to result in the formation of laminae or nuclei, eventually. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms that establish these different structural arrangements are not well understood. We undertook a differential display polymerase chain reaction (DD-PCR) screen to identify genes with distinct expression patterns between dorsal and ventral regions of the chick midbrain in order to identify genes which regulate the sculpturing of such divergent neuronal organisation. We focused on the DV axis of the early chick midbrain since mesencephalic alar plate and basal plate develop into laminae and nuclei, respectively. Results We identified 53 differentially expressed bands in our initial screen. Twenty-six of these could be assigned to specific genes and we could unambiguously show the differential expression of five of the isolated cDNAs in vivo by in situ mRNA expression analysis. Additionally, we verified differential levels of expression of a selected number of genes by using reverse transcriptase (RT) PCR method with gene-specific primers. One of these genes, QR1, has been previously cloned and we present here a detailed study of its early developmental time course and pattern of expression providing some insights into its possible function. Our phylogenetic analysis of QR1 shows that it is the chick orthologue of Sparc-like 1/Hevin/Mast9 gene in mice, rats, dogs and humans, a protein involved in cell adhesion. Conclusion This study reveals some possible networks, which might be involved in directing the difference in neuronal specification and cytoarchitecture observed in the brain.


Background
The precise neural networks of the adult brain are a consequence of early embryonic development, when nerve cells acquire their unique identity, location and connections. Early in development the neural tube is regionalized along its anterior-posterior (AP) axis into forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain and spinal cord [1]. Shortly after, the dorso-ventral (DV) axis is determined [2][3][4][5][6]. This morphological development is accompanied by the expression of specific transcription factors, which dictate the overall plan of the central nervous system (CNS). Within each region a large diversity of neurons appears in a precise spatial and temporal pattern [3].
Brain regions not only differ in their neuronal subtypes, but also in their cytoarchitectural structures -they can either form laminae or nuclei. Such functional organization within the brain requires that the newborn neurons not only acquire the correct phenotype, but that they migrate to the appropriate positions within the brain. Multiple factors such as different types of neuronal migration, cell division patterns and the identity of specific neurons, contribute to the final cytoarchitectural organization of the CNS. For example, radial migration of neurons prevails in the generation of laminae, whereas nuclei are formed as a result of more tangential migration. Furthermore, differences in the pattern of cell division have been suggested to influence the formation of laminae and nuclei. An initial higher symmetric division of progenitor cells in the ventricular zone results in a more lateral extension of the neuroepithelium, a feature observed in many laminae forming brain regions [7]. There is also increasing evidence that early events, which specify neuronal identity, also influence the migratory patterns these neurons will follow. The proneural basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors Neurogenin 1 and 2 (Ngn1 and Ngn2) not only specify neuronal versus glial fates, but also support neuronal migration [8][9][10]. Thus, the processes of neurogenesis and fate specification may be intimately co-regulated with the subsequent migration and final connectivity from a very early stage of neuronal development.
Several genes have been implicated in forming the right laminar structure in the mammalian cortex. One of the best studied pathways of altered neuronal migration is exemplified by the reelin and mdab genes, whose mutations affect neuronal migration and laminar architecture of the cerebral cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum [11]. The superficial layers of the superior colliculus of the reelin-deficient mice show some defects; however, they are not as pronounced as in the other areas of the brain [12]. Another complex of proteins that affects neuronal migration is the microtubule motor complex, which includes dynein, dynactin, Lis1 and Nde1. Loss of function of these proteins leads to defects in cortical lamination [13][14][15][16].
Interestingly, mice which lack Lis1 gene also exhibit a reduction in neuroblast proliferation [17] and mice lacking Nde1 are characterized by a small brain [18]. Taken together, these results emphasize the importance of coordinated regulation of neuronal precursor proliferation, fate specification and migration (for reviews see [19,20]).
The aim of this study was to identify known or novel candidate genes with potential roles in the regulation of differential cytoarchitecture and neuronal specificity observed in the midbrain. The chick midbrain is one of the brain regions, which gives rise to laminae and nuclei. Dorsally, in the tectum, neurons are organized in layers and receive and process visual and auditory information. Ventrally, the tegmentum forms discrete nuclei including the substantia nigra where the dopaminergic neurons affected in Parkinson's disease are found. Early in development ventral and dorsal parts of the mesencephalon are similar in size and structure. After embryonic day 3 of chick development the dorsal half of the midbrain undergoes rapid cell proliferation to form an enlarged tectum. This massive enlargement along the medio-lateral axis is not observed in the ventral midbrain, where immigrating cells from the rhombic lip contribute, for example, to the isthmic nuclei in birds ( [21] and references therein). Thus, the midbrain provides an ideal model system to address the question of molecular mechanisms orchestrating differential neuronal cytoarchitecture. We used a differential display (DD) screen [22,23] to identify genes with different expression patterns between ventral and dorsal midbrain of the chick some of which might be involved in regulating DV patterning of the mesencephalon. Different methods have been designed to identify and sample the different sets of genes expressed by specific tissue or cell types. Although the preferred current method for screens is a microarray, we feel that there is less bias in the production of a representative library from the tissue directly rather than relying on the microarray representation. Compared to a microarray, it is a cheap method, which might identify novel genes that haven't been annotated yet. In addition, at the time this screen was initiated, chicken based microarray systems were not available. Taken together a differential display is ideally suited for addressing developmental questions. We used chick embryos between stages HH 9-11 [24] to isolate midbrains. Separate cDNA representation libraries were prepared from dorsal and ventral parts of the midbrains and compared. cDNA bands that showed differential representation were isolated to verify the expression patterns in vivo by in situ RNA hybridisation analysis of whole mount chick embryos at the appropriate stages of development and/ or with RT-PCR.
In our initial screen we identified 53 bands, which were differentially represented between the dorsal and ventral parts of the midbrain. Twenty-six of these bands could be assigned to known genes and are listed in this work. Additional 8 bands could not be assigned to any known genes. Their chromosomal locations within the genome are presented. To date we do not have sequence information about the remaining 19 bands isolated in the screen. The differential expression pattern for five of the genes was verified by RT-PCR and by in situ mRNA hybridization to validate the screen. We also present a detailed expression study of one of the clones, M11d1, that was found to correspond to a previously identified gene, called QR1 [25,26].

Differential Display of mRNAs from the dorsal and ventral Parts of the Chick Midbrain
To identify genes with different spatial distribution between dorsal and ventral chick midbrain, we chose to use embryos from developmental stages HH 9-11 for our screen. At these stages there is no obvious anatomical difference between the ventral and dorsal parts of the midbrain, although the anterior-posterior subdivisions of the neural tube into the different parts of the brain are clearly visible. A schematic drawing of our screening strategy is presented in Fig. 1 and detailed in the materials and methods section. Here, we present the results of the 40 primer combinations we used in the initial screen.
The overview of the different steps of the screen is shown on figures 2A-D. Midbrains were excised as outlined in Fig. 2A and cut into dorsal and ventral parts, which were then processed for total RNA isolation. We performed three independent dissections and collections of embryos to isolate total mRNA, which was subsequently used for three independent cDNA syntheses. We assessed the integrity of the isolated RNA by agarose gel electrophoresis and staining the samples with ethidium bromide to visualize the 28S and 18S RNA (Fig. 2B). The cDNA products were amplified using radioactive nucleotides and different primer combinations by PCR amplification and separated on sequencing polyacrylamide gels. Representations from the ventral and dorsal cDNA were compared and bands, which showed differential representation, were excised from the gel (Fig. 2C displays an example of such a band, M5v4). All sample synthesis and amplification were performed in triplicate and only those bands, where all three PCR fragments from a particular primer combination showed differential representation were used for subsequent analysis. Bands isolated from sequencing gels were further amplified with the same primers that were used in the first round of amplification. We identified 53 differentially represented bands in our initial screen that were revealed by PCR analysis of the isolated cDNA. Of these, 19 were isolated from the ventral part of the midbrain and 34 from the dorsal part. The PCR products were separated on an agarose gel for further isolation and subcloning into a plasmid vector ( Fig. 2D shows examples of some re-amplified cDNA products with different primer combinations and Fig. 2E shows the inserts retrieved after subcloning the amplified products into pBS plasmid). A schematic representation of the different functional subclasses of genes identified in the screen is presented in Fig. 2F. Employing RNA in situ hybridisation we not only validated a differential dorsoventral expression of the candidate genes, but also detected the actual distribution of the mRNA transcripts in the chick midbrain at the appropriate stage (HH10). We used the original cDNA that was isolated and amplified from the acrylamide gels as templates for mRNA detection in in situ analysis. Antisense and sense RNA of the cDNA fragments were transcribed in vitro using T3 and T7 RNA polymerases. Of the clones, which were analysed in this manner we could unambiguously show that at least four (M5v1, M5v4, M7v1, and M11d1) had differential dorso-ventral expression pattern in the midbrain at HH10. The expression patterns of these four genes in the midbrain of the chick embryo at HH10 are shown on Fig. Schematic representation of the differential display PCR screen Figure 1 Schematic representation of the differential display PCR screen. An outline of the differential display-PCR technique utilised in the screen.
3. M5v4 shows a clear dorso-ventral gradient with much stronger expression in the ventral region of the neural tube (Fig. 3A). M7v1 displays a dorso-ventral gradient with a stronger dorsal expression in the neural tube (Fig.  3B). M11d1 shows a rather interesting pattern of expression with the highest concentration at the medio-lateral part of the neural tube (Fig. 3C). M5v1 has a clear strong expression in the ventral aspect of the midbrain (Fig. 3D).
We also verified different dorso-ventral expression levels by performing RT-PCR amplification with gene-specific primers for a selected group of genes to further validate the screening strategy (see Fig. 3E). The RT-PCR from cDNA of ventral and dorsal midbrain confirmed the original differential expression of the clones found in the DD-PCR. Clone M4d2 is strongly expressed in dorsal midbrain at HH10 and HH16, weakly in ventral midbrain at HH10 but has disappeared ventrally at HH16. F1d1 is present in ventral and dorsal midbrain at HH10 and HH16 but has a stronger expression in dorsal midbrain. F0d3 and F0d2 are only expressed in dorsal midbrain and M5v6 is only present in ventral midbrain. A summary of the gene identities obtained from this screen by comparing representational libraries from dorsal and ventral tissues is presented in table 1. Sequence information for the DNA fragments with no homology to any of the known genes is shown in table 2 along with the chromosomal locations of the sequences.

Clone M11d1 -the chick QR1/Sparc-like 1
We next concentrated on the identification of the extensions of the original 3' clones in order to obtain the full length coding sequences of these genes. To this end we utilised a SMART-RACE kit from Clontech to amplify extended cDNA products using the total RNA isolated from HH10 chick midbrain. We were able to obtain the 5' extension of M11d1 cDNA. BLAST search revealed this to be a known gene, QR1, which was originally isolated from the neural retina of quails [25,26]. Our phylogenetic analysis confirmed that this gene is orthologous to the vertebrate SPARC-like1/Hevin/Mast9 gene and related to but different from SPARC/osteonectin/BM40 (Fig. 4) [27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. QR1 encodes a protein, which is found in two forms, either associated with the extracellular matrix or diffusible in the medium [26]. The presence of QR1 protein in the Müller retinal glial cells coincides with cell cycle arrest and differentiation in these cells [25,26]. More recently, a screen for genes specifically expressed in the gliogenic ventral neuroepithelium of the chick at E6 identified QR1 expression in the medial spinal cord [34]. Its role in the astroglial cell specification was postulated, but not further investigated. An intriguing role for this family of proteins in neuronal histogenesis is revealed by the role of Sparclike 1 protein in organizing the cortical layering. Sparclike 1 was shown to act as an anti-adhesive molecule that is expressed by radial glia and dislodges the neurons from radial glia after they have migrated to the appropriate position in the cortex [35]. Our expression analysis of QR1/Sparc-like 1 during early embryonic stages demonstrated that QR1 was first expressed in the anterior neural tube up to the first somite, which coincides with the rhombencephalon -spinal cord boundary at HH 8 to 12 (Fig 5A-C). At these stages no expression was detected in the spinal cord. Coronal sections through the brain region confirmed a diffuse expression in the brain and no expression in the spinal cord (Fig. 5E, F) at HH 8. At later stages QR1 expression became more prominent in the ventral and lateral neural tube (see HH 20, Fig. 5D, G, J, K) and expression in lens tissue and in the medial part of the retina was observed (Fig. 4I). Coronal sections through the spinal cord at stage HH20 showed QR1 expression in the chorda (Fig. 5J, K) and around the ventricular zone of the intermediate spinal cord (Fig. 5K). At the level of the hind limbs ( Fig. 5K) QR1 expression was also seen in more ventral parts of the spinal cord. No QR1 mRNA was detected in the most posterior part of the spinal cord (Fig. 5L). This expression pattern was still observed at embryonic day four (see also [34]. Given that Sparc-like 1 regulates neural migration in the murine cortex [35] and might be involved in the Mueller retinal glial cell differentiation in the retina of the quail [26], our expression data support a role of QR1/Sparc-like 1 in guiding migration and thus Verification of the differential expression of the cDNAs excised from the gels by mRNA in situ hybridisation of chick midbrain Products of RT-PCR with gene-specific primers to verify differential expression of the transcripts in the dorsal and ventral parts of chick midbrains. Lanes are as follows: 1) HH 11 dorsal cDNA, 2) HH11 ventral cDNA, 3) HH16 dorsal cDNA, 4) HH16 ventral cDNA. The gene names and primer combinations are indicated above the relevant panels. GAPDH was used to normalize the cDNA expression levels. The equal amount of GAPDH amplified from ventral and dorsal midbrain cDNA demonstrates that there is no bias in the different cDNAs used.
the cytoarchitecture of neuronal arrangement in the developing chick midbrain.

Additional Genes identified in the Screen
The genes that were identified hitherto from our screen are summarized in table 1 and a representation of the different functional subclasses is shown in Fig. 2F. Some of the genes have been shown to have predominantly dorsal or ventral distribution within the neural tube. For example, clone M5v1 encodes an estrogen receptor α, and has been detected in ventral neurons of the rodent midbrain [36] and shown to regulate the serotonergic system of rodents and primates ( [36] and references therein). The fact that we isolated this transcript from the ventral part of the midbrain validates our screening strategy. The functional implications of this early expression of estrogen receptor α remain to be investigated in future work.
Another interesting cDNA isolated with two different sets of primers used in the screen, M5v4 and M12v3, encodes a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 5 (MEKKK 5/MAP4K5). This group of serine/threonine kinases are widely implicated in intracellular signalling. Interestingly, MEKKK 5 contains an additional functional domain, referred to as the citron domain. Another kinase with citron domain, the myotonic dystrophy kinaserelated Cdc42-binding kinase (MRCK alpha), has been shown to regulate neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells through binding to the small GTPases cdc42 and Rac [37]. A related kinase, germinal center kinase-related enzyme (GCKR), has recently been shown to act as a positive regulator of both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signalling in B-lymphocytes. The pathway requires Rac and leads to JNK activation [38]. Furthermore, a recent report has implicated non-canonical Wnt5a signalling and downstream activation of JNK and ROCK kinases in the guidance of facial branchiomotor neuron migration during mammalian development [39]. The non-canonical Wnt pathway also known as the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway identified in Drosophila is a conserved mechanism that polarizes cells along specific axes in a tissue. PCP regulates many developmental processes including convergent extension during gastrulation, neural tube closure, hair orientation in mammals and other processes (for review see [40,41]). The most prominent role of PCP is to regulate the dynamics of polarized cells and to impart directional motility to the cells ultimately contributing to tissue morphogenesis [40,41]. It will be interesting to address a possible role of the MEKKK 5 clone in the regulation of neuronal specification and/or migration during the development of the midbrain by modulating noncanonical Wnt signalling.
A potentially intriguing clone derived from our screen is M4d2, which corresponds to a Naked cuticle homologue 1 (Nkd1) gene. Nkd1 encodes a protein with a single EF hand (a calcium-binding motif) that is most similar to the Recoverin family of myristoyl switch proteins. It was proposed to link ion fluxes to the regulation of the potency, duration or distribution of Wnt signals [42]. Nkd 1 is one of the antagonists of Wnt signalling in vertebrates [43]. In Drosophila, Nkd 1 has been shown to target dishevelled and thus, to antagonize the canonical Wnt signalling as well as the non-canonical PCP pathway [44]. Wnt genes are widely expressed both in the dorsal and ventral midbrain [45][46][47]. Thus, the role of Nkd1 as a putative antagonist of Wnt signalling might be of great interest for the development of neurons in the dorsal midbrain.
Clone M5v6 encodes a transmembrane domain protein with homology to nidogen and a plexin repeat, called Plxdc2/TEM7R. Recently, its expression was analysed in the developing mouse embryo and was found in many patterning centres of the brain at early stages, e.g., in the cortical hem, midbrain-hindbrain boundary, and the midbrain floor plate [48]. Interestingly, the authors show a striking overlap of Plxdc2 expression with Wnt3a, Wnt5a and Wnt8b expression in certain areas [48]. In an intriguing study a ligand for Plxdc2/TEM7R was identified to be cortactin [49]. Cortactin is a substrate of Src kinase and Factin-binding protein. It has been implicated in the regulation of dendritic spine morphology and synaptic plasticity [50], in IgCAM-triggered actin assembly, which is involved in growth cone motility and guidance [51] and in mediating morphogenic cell movements during zebrafish (Danio rerio) gastrulation as well as in the development of the CNS [52]. Consequently, Plxdc2/TEM7R is of great interest as a potential regulator of cell migration during development and might have possible implications for the final location of different midbrain neurons.
Another class of molecules, which can modulate signalling pathways, are the heparan sulphate proteoglycans (HSPGs). These are found at the cell surface and can be modified by the addition of sulphate groups at specific sugar residues along the heparin sulphate (HS) chain. The The retrieved DNA sequences of the clones are given together with the location of these sequences on the chromosomes. addition or removal of sulphate groups creates a structural heterogeneity within the HSPGs, which can influence their ability to bind different proteins, notably growth factors and their receptors. In our screen, we identified Sulf1 that was encoded by clone M13v1a and is an extracellular HS 6-O-endosulfatase enzyme, which is a major regulator of HS 6-O-desulfation [53]. In Xenopus embryos, Xtsulf1 was shown to play an important role in modulating cell signalling during development by enhancing the axisinducing activity of Wnt11 and restricting BMP and FGF signalling [54]. Sulf1 has also been shown to modulate Sonic hedgehog (Shh) activity during oligodendrocyte differentiation in the spinal cord at a later stage of chick development [55]. Sulf1 is expressed just prior to the oligodendrocyte precursor specification in the ventral spinal cord and is likely to be responsible for the change in the distribution of Shh at this time point [55].
It is intriguing that the clones, which were isolated in our screen as putative positive regulators of Wnt signalling, i.e., M5v4/M12v3/MEKKK5 and M13v1a/Sulf1 homologue were enriched in the ventral part of the midbrain. This result raises the possibility that a differential regulation of Wnt activity in the chick midbrain might constitute part of the mechanism responsible for the subsequent formation of different types of neurons and cytoarchitectural arrangements found in the dorsal and ventral parts of this brain structure. Importantly, the putative antagonist of Wnt signalling, Nkd1 encoded by M4d2, was found in the dorsal part of the chick midbrain. Other known inhibitors A phylogenetic tree showing the relationships of the QR1-like genes Figure 4 A phylogenetic tree showing the relationships of the QR1-like genes. Multiple sequence alignments were generated using PileUp from the GCG Wisconsin package (Version 10.3, Accelrys Inc., San Diego, CA) and ClustalX [66]. Phylogenetic analyses were performed on an alignment of 250 amino-acids using the neighbour-joining method [67] with 1,000 pseudosamples, as implemented in PAUP* [68].
of Wnt signalling, e.g., Dkk1 (ACW, unpublished observations) and several SFRPs [56][57][58] are expressed in the dorsal midbrain as well, strengthening the possibility that differential Wnt signalling within the dorsal and ventral midbrain parts accounts at least in part for differential cytoarchitecture of this part of the brain. Recent work implicating the non-canonical Wnt5a/PCP pathway and the canonical Wnt pathway in the specification and regu-lation of dopaminergic progenitors and in ventral midbrain morphogenesis further supports the idea that differential Wnt regulation could account for differences in cytoarchitectural organization observed in the midbrain [59][60][61].
Another aspect of the general regulation of morphogenetic patterning involves proteins found in the extracellu-Developmental expression profile of QR1 in the chick embryo . Coronal sections through HH8 show a diffuse expression of QR1 in the lateral neural tube of the brain (E) but no expression in the spinal cord (F). This expression pattern is also observed at HH 10 (B) and HH 12 (B). However, at stage 10 the expression is more intense medio-laterally (see fig. 3C). (D-I) At HH 20, QR1 mRNA is also present in spinal cord, lens and retina but no longer in the more anterior regions of the brain. A coronal section through the midbrain (G) at HH 20 shows QR1 expression in the ventral part. An horizontal section through the hindbrain (H) reveals QR1 expression also in ventral regions adjacent to the floor plate. Coronal sections through the spinal cord at HH stage 20 show a medial expression (J, K) and at hind limb level (K) an additional diffuse ventral expression. In the tail region of the spinal cord (L) QR1 expression is not detected. Scale bars are 50 μm. lar matrix (ECM). In our screen, we identified an interesting candidate from this category of proteins, clone F0d2/F0d1, encoding Tenascin-C, a gene that is known to be involved in the regulation of cell migration. Tenascins are a family of large multimeric proteins of the extracellular matrix (ECM). These proteins promote weak cell adhesion and do not activate cell spreading [62]. Abnormalities have been found in the nervous system of Tenascin-C defective mice ( [62] and references therein). ECM proteins are of paramount importance in the regulation of cellular migration during development. Cells with different histories move together and influence each other during migration resulting in specific cytodifferentiation events. These induction events result in early embryonic morphogenetic patterning. Thus, the interactions between groups of cells and their collective movements are in part responsible for the morphogenetic patterning during development. The regulated expression of ECM proteins can create specific microenvironments, within which groups of cells can move and thus influence the morphogenetic events. Tenascin-C, also known as cytotactin has been shown to have a dynamic and restricted pattern of expression in the chick embryo and specifically within the CNS [63]. This raises the possibility that Tenascin-C may help to guide morphogenetic movements and subsequent pattern formation by providing a temporally and spatially regulated extracellular environment for interacting groups of cells. Such regulation of cellular migration in groups could then account for the different neuronal cytoarchitecture within the dorsal and ventral parts of the chick midbrain.
The other genes identified in our screen are likely to be important in the regulation of different processes, which ultimately lead to the formation of a fully patterned midbrain in the developing chick. Both of the chromatin modifiers we found, M1v1a that corresponds to MLL5 and F0d4, which represents the SMARCA5 gene, are highly interesting as the role of chromatin modifications in the regulation of differentiation programmes of the developing organisms is just now beginning to be elucidated. It will be exciting to investigate the involvement of these genes in the regulation of patterning.
In this work we present the results of a screen performed with the final goal of identifying genes that are not only involved in the specification of neurons but also in establishing the different cytoarchitectural patterns found in the dorsal and ventral midbrain of the chick. These two regions show a distinctly different arrangement of neurons, that is a laminar organization in the dorsal/tectal part and a nuclear organization in the ventral/tegmental part. We identified several differentially expressed mRNAs from midbrains of chicks at HH9-11. The expression of one of the clones, QR1, has been previously shown to coincide with the cell cycle arrest in the Mueller retinal glial cells of the quail. QR1 has also been suggested to play a role in the differentiation of the astroglia in the spinal cord based on the timing and spatial distribution of its expression in the spinal cord [26,34]. More recent work implicated the mouse orthologue of QR1, Sparc-like 1 protein in restricting migration of cortical neurons [35]. We could show a very early onset of expression of QR1 in the chick embryo in the midbrain at HH8-10. It is interesting to postulate a possible role for QR1 in regulating some aspects of neural migration in the chick midbrain as was demonstrated for Sparc-like 1 [35]. However, proof of this will need a detailed analysis of its function in vivo.
Further work on the elucidation of the function of the clones obtained from our screen should provide valuable insight into the mechanisms that govern the organisation of higher neural structures, which are necessary for the correct processing of information by the animal.

Conclusion
Here, we present evidence for the differential expression of several genes in the dorsal and ventral parts of the chick midbrain, which expands our knowledge of the molecular repertoire used during early development in the midbrain. The identified genes should also provide a useful starting platform to address questions that concern regulating mechanisms involved in the sculpturing of the different neuronal cytoarchitectural arrangement in this part of the brain.

Methods
Fertile hen's eggs were incubated at 37°C in a humidified chamber to the required stage. The embryos were isolated and staged according to Hamburger and Hamilton [24]. Midbrains were isolated and separated into dorsal and ventral parts. These were used to prepare the cDNA libraries used in the screen.

RNA Isolation
Total RNA from ventral and dorsal parts of the midbrains was prepared using RNeasy Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The integrity of RNA was assessed on a 1% formaldehyde-agarose gel and the 28S and 18S rRNA were visualized using ethidium bromide. The concentration of RNA was determined by densitometry and normalization to the known amounts of standards, which were loaded onto the gels in parallel with the samples.

Differential Display Analysis
We employed a previously published method of DD-PCR [22] using the primers previously described [23]. Briefly, combinations of 11 different oligo-dT primers (A-M) and 20 different 5' random primers (0-19) were used for the cDNA synthesis and DD-PCR (for primer sequences, see [23]. As it was previously reported [23] and personally communicated to us (Leimeister C and see [64]), that the primers M and F give the most results, we present here our initial screen with the combination of these two oligo-dT primers with the 20 5' random primers. Total RNA (300 ng) from ventral or dorsal midbrain was mixed with 2.5 μl of 20 μM oligo dT (3') primer in a total volume of 13 μl. This mixture was then heated to 75°C for 10 minutes and cooled on ice. The remainder of the reverse transcription (RT) reaction containing 5 μl 5× synthesis buffer, 2.5 μl 0.1 MDTT, 2.5 μl 250 μM dNTP-Mix, 1.5 μl H 2 O, and 50 U SuperScriptII reverse transcriptase (Gibco) were then added to the reactions containing ventral or dorsal RNA and the reactions were allowed to proceed at 37°C for 70 minutes. The enzyme was then denatured at 95°C for 10 minutes prior to further processing of the samples. The DD-PCR reactions were prepared as follows: 1 μl of the above cDNA already containing the 3'primer, 1 μl 10 × PCR buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH9.0, 500 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl 2 , 1% Triton-X 100, 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin), 0.375 μl 100 μM dNTP, 0.625 μl 20 μM 5'random primer, 1 μCi α 32 P-dCTP, 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Gibco), and 0.025 U Pwo polymerase (AGS) in a total volume of 10 μl. The reactions were overlaid with Paraffin oil and PCR carried out as follows: 60 second denaturation at 94°C, eight cycles of 45 second denaturation at 94°C, 60-second annealing at 41°C, and 120 second elongation at 72°C, followed by 15 cycles of 45 seconds at 94°C, 45 seconds at 60°C and 120 seconds at 72°C, completed by a final elongation of 5 minutes at 72°C. Subsequently, the PCR reactions were mixed with 4.5 μl denaturing sequencing dye (10 mM NaOH, 95% formamide, 0.05% bromophenol blue, 0.05% xylene cyanol) and 7 μl aliquots were separated on standard 6% polyacrylamide, 7 M urea sequencing gels. Gels were then dried and exposed to X-ray films overnight at room temperature.

Re-amplification and Sequencing of PCR Products
Candidate bands for differentially expressed mRNAs were excised from the dried gels. For re-amplification, we used one third of the excised gel slice directly. The PCR mixture (50 μl) contained 60 pmol of upstream and downstream primers, 50 μM dNTP, and 5 U Taq polymerase. The cycling was performed as follows: 2 minutes at 94°C initially and 30 cycles at 94°C for 45 seconds, 60°C for 60 seconds annealing, and 72°C for 120 seconds elongation followed by a final extension for 5 minutes at 72°C. Amplified products were prepared for restriction digestion with Hind III (the site was incorporated into the primers facilitating the subcloning) by purification of the amplified DNA bands from the agarose gels with the Qiagen mini-columns. The bands were subcloned into pBS plasmid digested with Hind III and treated with calf alkaline phosphatase. Subcloned fragments were then used for making probes for in situ hybridisation and sequencing of the inserts.

5' Race to obtain the Extension of the original PCR Products
Race-SMART kit from Clontech was used to obtain extensions of original PCR clones isolated in the differential display-PCR (DD-PCR) screen and followed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The sequences were compared to GeneBank and EMBL databases using the BLAST program (GCG program package, Genetics Computer Group Inc., Madison, WI).
mRNA In Situ Hybridisation Differential expression of the candidate genes was verified by performing whole mount mRNA in situ hybridisation using the subcloned inserts at different stages of chick development. Digoxygenin-labelled RNA probes were synthesized from the cDNA clones with T3 and T7 RNA polymerases and both were used for subsequent in situ hybridisation analysis, whereby one copy represented sense and the other -anti-sense orientation of the corresponding transcript. The hybridisations were performed as described [65]. Embryos were photographed and subsequently embedded in gelatine-albumin mixture and sectioned on a vibratome. Sections were then mounted under coverslips using a mixture of PBS: Glycerol (1:10) and the staining visualized under a light microscope.

Reverse Transcription and PCR amplification of identified genes
Midbrains were collected from staged chick embryos, as described above and total RNA was isolated using a Qiagen RNeasy kit according to manufacturer's instructions. We used 300 ng of total RNA from a collection of HH10 and HH16 midbrains for reverse transcription. The RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase to remove genomic DNA. M-MLV reverse transcriptase was used to synthesise the first strand of cDNA using random hexamers as primers. The cDNA template was then used directly in a PCR reaction with gene-specific primers to detect the presence of transcripts in dorsal and ventral parts of the midbrains. The primers used were as follows: GAPDH fwd 5'-ACG CCA TCA CTA TCT TCC AG-3', rev 5'-GTT GAC ACC CAT CAC AAA CA-3'; M4d2, naked cuticle homologue fwd 5'-AAC GGA AGA GTC ACA CGT GAG-3', rev 5'-GCA TGG AAG GTT TCA GGT TCA-3'; M5v6, plexin domain-containing protein 2 precursor fwd 5'-GTG GAG CTG CAG ATG TCA AAG-3', rev 5'-GCA GGA TGT CCA GAT CCT CTT-3'; F1d1, signal recognition particle 14 kD homologue fwd 5'-CTG ACA GAG CTG ACG AGA CTC-3', rev 5'-GTG ATG GTA GGG CAC TGT CC-3'; F0d2, tenascin C fwd 5'-AAG TGC TAC CGA GGT TCA GTC-3', rev 5'-CAT CTC CAA CGC TGA ACT TGT-3'; F0d3, similar to SH2 domain containing molecule EAT2 fwd 5'-GCT GGA GCC TTG TGT CTG TG-3', rev 5'-GTG CTG GAT CTA CAT GGG CAA-3'. All primers were chosen to be intron-spanning to minimize any possible contamination with genomic DNA.