Skip to main content

Table 3 Downregulated genes

From: Expression profiling in transgenic FVB/N embryonic stem cells overexpressing STAT3

Probe set

Identifier

RefSeq

Chr

MM/PM fold change

MM/PM p-value (t-test)

PM fold change

PM p-value (t-test)

RTQ-PCR fold change

97283_at

developmental pluripotency-associated 3 (Dppa3)

NM_139218

6

-2.16

0.10982

-2.81

0.047749

-11.4 ± 1.51

133948_at

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2C 4 (Eif2c4)

AI504948

17

-1.53

0.044727

-1.46

0.018363

n.d.

134566_at

Left-right determination factor 2 (Lefty2)

NM_177099

1

-2.7

0.029827

-2.32

0.025196

-2.35 ± 0.23

103389_at

aminoadipate-semialdehyde synthase (Aass)

NM_013930

6

-2.07

0.077262

-1.71

0.100000

n.d.

167617_r_at

transmembrane protein 109 (Tmem 109)

NM_134142

19

-1.89

0.036619

-1.73

0.042999

n.d.

166131_at

enabled homolog (Enah)

NM_001083120

1

-1.55

0.008738

-1.46

0.016412

n.d.

138014_at

nucleoporin 153 (Nup 153)

NM_175749

13

-1.55

0.012282

-1.49

0.011324

n.d.

167824_f_at

S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (p45/Skp2)

NM_013787

15

-1.74

0.054672

-1.62

0.073491

-1.27 ± 0.03

100499_at

syntaxin 3 (Stx3)

NM_001025307

19

-2.09

0.033994

-2.03

0.036655

n.d.

166600_at

KH domain containing, RNA binding, signal transduction associated 3 (Khdrbs3)

NM_010158

15

-1.66

0.027322

-1.52

0.035974

n.d.

93568_i_at 93569_f_at

RIKEN cDNA 2610042L04 gene

BC096548.1

14

-3.29

0.069938

-2.94

0.070848

n.d.

161004_at

RIKEN cDNA 1700097N02 gene

XM_001479022

17

-2.12

0.100000

-2.24

0.002726

n.d.

167843_f_at

similar to RIKEN cDNA 1110051B16 gene

XM_001472554

14

-2.71

0.004646

-1.81

0.003623

n.d.

  1. Genes downregulated after STAT3-MER activation through OHT. 13 genes were found to be significantly downregulated when compared with WT FVB/N cells cultivated in presence of LIF. Only genes with a 1.5× fold decrease were considered as significant. The expression levels of selected genes were confirmed by real time PCR analysis. Calculations were performed with both the PM/MM (perfect match/mismatch) difference model and the PM (perfect match) only model in order to compare the results.