Open Access

Deaf-1 regulates epithelial cell proliferation and side-branching in the mammary gland

  • Holly E Barker1,
  • Gordon K Smyth1,
  • James Wettenhall1,
  • Teresa A Ward1,
  • Mary L Bath1,
  • Geoffrey J Lindeman1, 2 and
  • Jane E Visvader1Email author
BMC Developmental Biology20088:94

DOI: 10.1186/1471-213X-8-94

Received: 24 May 2008

Accepted: 01 October 2008

Published: 01 October 2008



The transcription factor DEAF-1 has been identified as a high affinity binding partner of the LIM-only protein LMO4 that plays important roles in mammary gland development and breast cancer. Here we investigated the influence of DEAF-1 on human and mouse mammary epithelial cells both in vitro and in vivo and identified a potential target gene.


Overexpression of DEAF-1 in human breast epithelial MCF10A cells enhanced cell proliferation in the mammary acini that develop in 3D cultures. To investigate the effects of Deaf-1 on mammary gland development and oncogenesis, we generated MMTV-Deaf-1 transgenic mice. Increased ductal side-branching was observed in young virgin mammary glands, accompanied by augmented cell proliferation. In addition, the ratio of the progesterone receptor isoforms PRA and PRB, previously implicated in regulating ductal side-branching, was altered. Affymetrix gene profiling studies revealed Rac3 as a potential target gene and quantitative RT-PCR analysis confirmed that Rac3 was upregulated by Deaf-1 in immortalized mouse mammary epithelial cells. Furthermore, MMTV-Deaf-1 transgenic mammary glands were found to have elevated levels of Rac3 mRNA, suggesting that it is a bona fide target.


We have demonstrated that overexpression of Deaf-1 enhances the proliferation of human breast epithelial cells in vitro and mouse epithelial cells in vivo. Transgenic mammary glands overexpressing Deaf-1 exhibited a modest side-branching phenotype, accompanied by an increase in the number of BrdU-positive cells and a decrease in the proportion of PRA-expressing cells. Although proliferation was enhanced in Deaf-1 transgenic mice, overexpression of this gene was not sufficient to induce the formation of mammary tumors. In addition, our studies identified Rac3, encoding a small Rho-like GTPase, as a potential target of Deaf-1 in mouse mammary epithelial cells.


Mammary gland development requires the coordinated action of hormones and growth factors [1]. Embryonic development involves the formation of mammary placodes and rudimentary sprouts, while the majority of mammopoiesis occurs post-natally. Functional development of the mammary gland is initiated at puberty upon secretion of the ovarian hormones estrogen and progesterone which instigate reciprocal signaling between the epithelium and stroma (reviewed in [2]). By 8 – 10 weeks of age in the mouse, complex branching and elongation through the stroma results in an extensive network of ducts filling the entire mammary fat pad. During pregnancy, the secretory alveolar structures develop and functionally differentiate to enable milk production in late pregnancy and milk secretion during lactation. At weaning, the process of involution commences and involves extensive remodeling of the mammary gland to a virgin-like state.

Several signaling pathways and transcription factors have been shown to have essential roles in regulating mammary gland development in the mouse (reviewed in [1, 3]). Deformed epidermal autoregulatory factor-1 (DEAF-1) was first isolated in Drosophila melanogaster as a novel DNA-binding protein that binds an upstream response element of the homeotic gene Deformed [4]. Since its discovery, orthologues in human, rat and monkey have been identified and all exhibit a relatively low degree (46%) of similarity to the Drosophila protein [5]. The centrally located SAND domain (Sp100, AIRE-1, NucP41/75 and DEAF-1) along with the MYND domain (myeloid translocation protein 8, Nervy and DEAF-1) in the carboxy-terminus comprise the evolutionarily conserved structural regions of DEAF-1 that have been extensively characterized in other transcription factors. The SAND domain contains a nuclear localization signal (NLS) and appears to confer DNA-binding activity [5]. The MYND domain is a cysteine-rich structure that likely mediates protein-protein interactions [4, 5]. DEAF-1 is the only known mammalian protein that contains both a SAND and MYND domain. In Drosophila, DEAF-1 plays an important role in embryonic development, particularly in the segmentation stage following cuticle secretion [6].

The mammalian DEAF-1 protein was first identified in an affinity-binding screen using a synthetic retinoic acid response element (RARE). Deaf-1 transcripts appear to be widely distributed in rat and mouse tissues [5], with highest levels present in the central nervous system, dorsal root ganglia, submandibular gland, epidermis and mammary placodes of the embryo [7], and the brain, lung and spleen in the adult [5]. At a biochemical level, Deaf-1 has been shown to interact with Lmo4, a LIM-only adaptor protein, as well as with members of the nuclear Clim/Ldb protein family [7]. Disruption of Deaf-1 in mice revealed that it is important for neural tube closure and skeletal patterning [8]. Deaf-1-deficient mice displayed exencephaly, transformation of cervical segments and rib cage abnormalities, albeit with incomplete penetrance. Interestingly, Lmo4-deficient mice also exhibited neural tube defects and homeotic transformations [8], suggesting that Lmo4 and Deaf-1 act in a complex to mediate specific physiological functions. In the context of mammary tissue, conditional deletion of Lmo4 in mouse mammary glands during pregnancy results in impaired alveolar development [9]. Conversely, overexpression of LMO4 has been observed in greater than 50% of human breast cancers and Lmo4 is oncogenic when overexpressed in the mammary glands of transgenic mice [10].

Given that Deaf-1 is expressed in the mammary gland and forms a complex with Lmo4, we explored a potential role for Deaf-1 in mammary epithelial cells. Overexpression of DEAF-1 in MCF10A cells revealed that DEAF-1 plays a role in regulating the proliferation of human breast epithelial cells and increased ductal epithelial proliferation was also observed in young Deaf-1 transgenic mice in the post-pubertal phase. Concomitantly, decreased expression of PRA and augmented side-branching were apparent in these mice. In contrast to Lmo4, overexpression of Deaf-1 in transgenic mice did not induce mammary hyperplasia or tumors. Finally, Affymetrix gene profiling studies were carried out to explore potential Deaf-1 target genes in mammary epithelial cells, leading to the identification of Rac3 which encodes a small Rho-like GTPase [11].


DEAF-1 enhances the proliferation of human mammary epithelial cells

To generate human breast epithelial cells stably overexpressing human DEAF-1 protein, MCF10A cells were initially transfected with a vector containing the mouse Ecotropic Receptor (EcoR) gene to generate MCF10A-EcoR cells. These cells were subsequently infected with an ecotropic pBabe-puro retrovirus encoding DEAF-1. Western blotting of whole cell lysates confirmed that DEAF-1 was overexpressed in DEAF-1-transduced MCF10A-EcoR cells relative to control cells transduced with an empty vector (Fig. 1A).
Figure 1

Overexpression of DEAF-1 in MCF10A cells leads to enhanced cellular proliferation within acini. A) MCF10A-EcoR cells transduced with either a Deaf-1-expressing or empty pBabe-puro retrovirus were analyzed by western blotting of whole cell lysates using anti-DEAF-1 polyclonal antisera. Blotting for tubulin provided a loading control. B) Control or Deaf-1 expressing MCF10-EcoR cells were plated at 4,000 cells/well in eight-well glass chamber slides. Wells were pre-coated with Matrigel and the final culture medium contained 20 ng/ml EGF and 2% Matrigel. Acini were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde after 8 days in culture, immunostained with anti-DEAF-1 (green), counterstained with DAPI (blue) and acini visualized by confocal microscopy (DAPI = uv; and DEAF-1 = 488 nm). Scale bar represents 47.6 μm. C) Transduced acini were grown as in B) from control MCF10A-EcoR cells, DEAF-1-transduced-MCF10A cells, and malignant MCF10CA1h cells. Cells were fixed in 2% PFA after 6, 8 and 10 days in culture. Acini were immunostained with anti-Ki67 (green) and counterstained with DAPI (blue) following 6, 8 and 10 days in culture. At least three independent experiments were performed. Acini were visualized with a confocal microscope (DAPI = uv; and Ki67 = 488 nm). Scale bar represents 47.6 μm.

The MCF10A cellular assay described by Debnath et al [12] was used to assess the effect of DEAF-1 on breast epithelial cell proliferation and the formation of acinar structures. Transduced cells were cultured for periods of 6, 8 or 10 days, after which they were immunostained and evaluated by immunofluorescence using confocal microscopy. DEAF-1 expression was detected using an antibody raised against an amino-terminal peptide in the DEAF-1 protein. Acini generated from MCF10A-EcoR cells transduced with the DEAF-1 retrovirus expressed high levels of DEAF-1 protein, whereas DEAF-1 expression was undetectable in control acini (Fig. 1B). To assess cell proliferation, acini were immunostained with anti-Ki67 antibody. In general, proliferating cells were found to be restricted to the periphery of acini and were evident in both control and DEAF-1-expressing acini following 6 and 8 days of culture. By 10 days, proliferation ceased in control acini which appeared organized and spherical (Fig. 1C, lower left panel). In contrast, DEAF-1 overexpressing acini continued to proliferate, with a commensurate increase in the size and number of acini (Fig. 1C, lower middle panel). The malignant isogenic MCF10CA1h cell line was included as a control as it generates abnormal acinar structures. The MCF10CA1h cell line was derived from tumors arising in mice that had been injected with the HA-ras transformed MCF10AneoT cells, following transduction of parental MCF10A cells [13, 14]. As expected, proliferation in MCF10CA1h acini was prolonged (Fig. 1C, lower right panel) and Ki67-positive cells were observed up to 21 days in culture (data not shown). Reminiscent of MCF10CA1h acini, DEAF-1 overexpressing acini also appeared more disorganized. Apoptosis and polarity were assessed by TUNEL and anti-GM130 staining respectively but no differences were observed (data not shown).

Generation of Deaf-1 transgenic mice

To evaluate the expression of Deaf-1 during mammary development, RNA was isolated from mouse mammary glands at different developmental stages and subjected to quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Expression of Deaf-1 was quantified relative to that of the luminal epithelial marker cytokeratin 18 (CK18) and was found to be expressed at all stages of mammary gland development, with slightly higher expression observed during pregnancy and lactation (Fig. 2A).
Figure 2

Generation and analysis of Deaf-1 transgenic mice. A) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of RNA purified from mouse mammary glands at different stages of development (wkV, week-old virgin; dP, days pregnant; dL, days lactation; and dI, days involution) using Deaf-1 and CK18 specific primers. Data are from at least two wild-type mice for each time-point and error bars represent standard deviation from the mean. B) Schematic diagram of the 7 kb transgenic construct showing the MMTV promoter, the HA-Deaf-1 transgene, and the rabbit β-globin plus SV40poly(A) intronic sequences. C) Southern blot analysis of HindIII-digested tail DNA, probed with a [α-32P]-labeled SV40 fragment. Arrow indicates the Deaf-1 fragment. D) Western blot analysis of protein lysates from 8 week-old virgin (8 wkV), 18 days pregnant (18 dP) and 1 day lactating (1 dL) mammary glands from Deaf-29, Deaf-42 and Deaf-1 transgenic strains. Anti-Deaf-1 and anti-HA antibodies were used to detect the HA-tagged Deaf-1 protein. Wild-type mammary gland lysate provided a negative control (upper panel). Samples of each lysate (prior to immunoprecipitation) were subject to immunoblotting with anti-tubulin to control for protein loading (lower panel).

To investigate the effects of Deaf-1 overexpression on mammary gland development and oncogenesis, we generated transgenic mice expressing a HA-tagged mouse Deaf-1 (full-length) gene under the control of the mouse mammary tumor virus-long terminal repeat (MMTV-LTR). The MMTV-LTR is active in both virgin and pregnant mammary glands [15] but reaches maximal activity during pregnancy since the long terminal repeat (LTR) of the MMTV promoter is activated by steroid hormones. The transgene included rabbit β-globin and simian virus 40 (SV40) intronic sequences to augment mRNA stability, as well as a polyadenylation (poly(A)) sequence (Fig. 2B). Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA from the offspring of founder mice demonstrated that five lines transmitted the transgene with variation in copy number evident (Fig. 2C). Expression of the transgene was assessed by immunoprecipitation of mammary protein lysates from virgin, pregnant (18 dP) and lactating (1 dL) mice with anti-Deaf-1 polyclonal antisera, followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody. Abundant expression of the transgene was observed during pregnancy and lactation in two strains, Deaf-29 and Deaf-42 (Fig. 2D, upper panel). Immunoblotting of lysates prior to immunoprecipitation with anti-tubulin antibody provided a loading control (Fig. 2D, lower panel).

Deaf-1transgenic mammary glands exhibit increased side-branching in young mice

Analysis of young virgin transgenic mice (8 weeks of age) revealed an increase in the number of side-branches by wholemount and histological analyses (Fig. 3A). Since fluctuation in ductal branching occurs during the estrous cycle, vaginal smears were stained with haematoxylin and eosin to ensure that mammary glands were harvested from mice at the same stage of the estrous cycle. For strain Deaf-29, 5 out of 12 mice exhibited mammary glands with substantially increased side-branching compared with 2 out of 5 Deaf-42 transgenic mice (Table 1). Although some variation in the degree of side-branching was noted amongst the sixteen control (wild-type) mice analyzed, transgenic mice exhibited profoundly abnormal mammary glands compared to wild-type glands.
Figure 3

Increased side-branching and proliferation in the mammary glands of young Deaf-1 transgenic mice. A) Wholemounts of thoracic mammary glands harvested from transgenic (a) and wild-type (b) 8 week-old virgin mice. Original magnification, ×7.5. Sections of inguinal mammary glands from transgenic (c and e) and wild-type (d and f) mice stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Original magnification, ×40 (c and d) and ×400 (e and f). B) Immunostaining of mammary sections from transgenic (a) and wild-type (b) 8 week-old mice with anti-BrdU. Original magnification ×400. C) Percent BrdU-positive cells was calculated by counting greater than 1,000 nuclei in 10 random fields for each mouse. At least 5 mice were analyzed for both transgenic and wild-type genotypes. The percentage of BrdU-positive cells in transgenic glands (Tg) was 24.2% ± 7.9% versus 2.5% ± 1.2% in control (wt) glands. Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean. D) Immunostaining of sections from transgenic (a and b) and wild-type (c and d) mammary glands of 8 week-old mice using anti-PRA antibody. Original magnification ×400. E) Percent PRA-positive cells was calculated by counting greater than 1,000 nuclei in 10 random fields for each mouse. At least 4 mice were analyzed for each genotype. The percentage of PRA-positive cells in transgenic glands (Tg) was 32.1% ± 3.0% versus 61.8% ± 2.9% in control (wt) glands. Error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean.

Table 1

Number of Deaf-29 and Deaf-42 transgenic mice exhibiting a side-branching phenotype

Transgenic Line






* Number of mice at 8 weeks exhibiting a phenotype/total number of transgenic mice analyzed.

Increased proliferation and altered expression of PRA and PRB in Deaf-1transgenic glands

Side-branching occurs concomitantly with epithelial cell proliferation in pubertal mammary glands. In vivo BrdU labeling was therefore used to quantify proliferation in transgenic and wild-type glands. Transgenic 8 week-old virgin mice showed a marked increase in the number of proliferating cells (24.2 ± 7.9% BrdU-positive ductal epithelial cells in transgenic glands compared to 2.5 ± 1.2% in wild-type glands, Figs. 3B and 3C). TUNEL staining was employed to quantify the number of apoptotic cells in the virgin glands but few TUNEL-positive cells were apparent and no difference was observed between transgenic and wild-type glands (data not shown).

The progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms together with Wnt4 play important roles in development of the mammary ductal tree during puberty [1618]. To assess the expression of PR in virgin mammary glands of transgenic mice, immunofluorescence was performed using anti-PRA and anti-PRB specific antibodies. Fewer ductal epithelial cells were positive for PRA in transgenic mammary glands relative to those from wild-type mice (Fig. 3D). Detection of the PRB isoform by immunostaining proved difficult, although low levels were seen in transgenic and wild-type glands (data not shown). To quantify the number of PRA-positive cells in wild-type versus transgenic mammary glands, immunohistochemistry was performed: 32.1 ± 3.0% ductal epithelial cells were PRA-positive in transgenic glands compared to 61.8 ± 2.9% in wild-type glands (Fig. 3E). Wnt4 expression was assessed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis but no difference was observed between transgenic and wild-type glands (data not shown).

Deaf-1transgenic mammary glands appear normal during pregnancy, lactation and involution and do not develop tumors

Wholemounts and histological sections were prepared from transgenic (Deaf-29 and Deaf-42) and wild-type mice at the following stages of mammary gland development: 12 and 18 days of pregnancy, 1 and 8 days of lactation, and 1 and 4 days of involution. All transgenic mammary glands appeared morphologically normal. Figure 4 shows representative wholemounts and sections harvested from transgenic and wild-type mice at pregnancy, lactation and involution. At least three mice of each genotype were analyzed for each stage.
Figure 4

No phenotype is evident in Deaf-1 transgenic mice during pregnancy, lactation and involution. A) Wholemounts of inguinal mammary glands from Deaf-1 transgenic (a, c and e) or FVB/N wild-type mice (b, d and f). Whole-mounted glands at different time-points: 12 days of pregnancy (12 dP; a and b), 1 day of lactation (1 dL; c and d) and 4 days of involution (4 dI; e and f). Original magnification ×7.5. B) Sections of glands from Deaf-1 transgenic (a, c and e) and FVB/N wild-type mice (b, d and f) at 12 days of pregnancy (12 dP; a and b), 1 day of lactation (1 dL; c and d) and 4 days of involution (4 dI; e and f). Original magnification ×100. Tg, transgenic; wt, wild-type.

To investigate the oncogenic potential of Deaf-1 in the mammary gland, pituitary isografting was employed to recapitulate pregnancy and increase MMTV-LTR-driven Deaf-1 expression [19]. Two pituitary glands from FVB/N mice were transplanted into each inguinal mammary gland of 7 week-old transgenic and wild-type mice, which were then maintained for 12 months. Mice presenting with tumors (or another illness) prior to 12 months were sacrificed early. Although two out of thirteen (15.4%) Deaf-29 transgenic mice developed mammary tumors within 12 months of age, one out of ten wild-type mice (10%) developed a tumor during this period. Moreover, Deaf-1 transgenic glands did not exhibit hyperplasia. We therefore conclude that overexpression of Deaf-1 is not sufficient to induce mammary tumors.

Rac3is a potential target gene of Deaf-1 in the mammary gland

To investigate potential target genes of Deaf-1, primary mammary epithelial cells (MECs) were isolated from a Deaf-1-/- mouse and immortalised by transduction with a retrovirus encoding the human papilloma virus (HPV16) E6/E7 proteins. Two MEC clones were selected and transduced with either an empty retrovirus or one encoding Deaf-1. RNA was subsequently isolated from cells at 24 and 48 hours post-transduction for Affymetrix analysis and protein lysates were prepared for Western blot analysis. In addition, cells were plated on coverslips to assess Deaf-1 protein expression at each time-point by immunofluorescence. High levels of Deaf-1 expression were demonstrated in cells transduced with the Deaf-1 retrovirus relative to control cells following a 48 hour selection in puromycin (Figs. 5A and 5B). This time-point was therefore selected for further analysis.
Figure 5

Rac3 is a candidate Deaf-1 target gene. Expression of Deaf-1 in whole cell lysates from cells infected with a Deaf-1 retrovirus (+) or control retrovirus (-). Two independent clones (C1 and E1) were generated and used for these studies. Western blots were probed with anti-Deaf-1 antibody. B) Clones transduced with either a Deaf-1 or control retrovirus were plated on coverslips and immunostained with anti-Deaf-1 polyclonal antisera, followed by FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody. Cells were counterstained with DAPI to visualize nuclei by fluorescence microscopy (clones C1 and E1 are shown). C) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed on cDNA generated from Affymetrix RNA samples using primers specific for Deaf-1, Rac3 and 18S rRNA. Data are from two independent experiments and error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean. D) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of RNA prepared from wild-type or Deaf-1 transgenic mammary glands of 8 week-old mice using primers specific for Rac3 and HPRT.

To compare the gene expression profiles of Deaf-1-transduced MECs relative to Deaf-1-deficient MECs, Affymetrix analysis was performed using the GeneChip® Mouse Expression Set 430 2.0 array which comprises 39,000 transcripts on a single array. Total RNA was harvested from two independent clones (C1 and E1) infected with either control or Deaf-1-expressing retrovirus, representing four samples in total. Clones C1 and E1 were treated as biological replicates in the subsequent analysis. Notably, the top gene differentially expressed between Deaf-1 and control samples following hybridization to Affymetrix chips was Deaf-1 itself. Table 2 lists the top 10 genes that were expressed in a differential manner with a p-value less than 0.01. This order was based on calculation of the t statistic, which is a measure of consistency between the two clones, C1 and E1. The top five differentially expressed genes obtained from this analysis were: Deaf-1, Eif4g3, Agbl5,Kng1 and Rac3.
Table 2

Top 10 differentially expressed genes between Deaf-1 and control samples



































































Rac3 appeared to be of most interest since its expression has previously been reported in breast cancer epithelial cells [11]. To validate whether Rac3 was a potential target of Deaf-1, real-time RT-PCR analysis was performed. An increase in Rac3 levels was confirmed (Fig. 5C), as was also observed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis (data not shown). To further examine the correlation between Rac3 and Deaf-1 expression, RT-PCR analysis was performed on RNA derived from wild-type and Deaf-1 transgenic mammary glands. Increased expression of Rac3 was observed in MMTV-Deaf-1 transgenic samples (Figure 5D). Although a single wild-type mouse showed the same level of Rac3 mRNA as transgenic glands, all other wild-type mice exhibited substantially lower levels of Rac3. Therefore, it seems likely that Rac3 represents a bona fide target gene.


The Deaf-1 transcription factor has been implicated in a number of developmental processes, including skeletal patterning and neural tube closure in the mouse embryo [8]. To further understand the role of Deaf-1 in breast epithelial cells, we examined the effect of DEAF-1 overexpression in MCF10A cells and in the mammary glands of transgenic mice. MCF10A breast epithelial cells exhibit many characteristics of normal breast epithelium including hormone and growth factor-responsive growth in three-dimensional cultures and the inability to grow in an anchorage-independent manner [20]. Overexpression of DEAF-1 in MCF10A cells was found to enhance cellular proliferation in mammary acini but no change was observed in the number of apoptotic cells or in cell polarity.

Overexpression of Deaf-1 in the mammary glands of transgenic mice led to a proliferative defect and a striking increase in the number of side-branches in young post-pubertal mice. The phenotype observed in the Deaf-1 transgenic mice was transient as it was no longer evident in older adult mice at 12 weeks of age. No pronounced defects were evident in Deaf-1-deficient mice, possibly reflecting compensatory mechanisms (unpubl. data). Interestingly, a transient delay in ductal development has previously been observed in virgin mice expressing a dominant negative form of Lmo4 (engrailed-Lmo4 fusion protein) [21]. A transient phenotype has also been reported in Bim knockout mice [22]. The increased number of side-branches occurring within the mammary glands of young females in two transgenic strains was accompanied by a significant increase in the proportion of BrdU-positive cells. In addition, decreased expression of the progesterone receptor isoform PRA was observed in MMTV-Deaf-1 transgenic mammary glands. Approximately 62% of ductal epithelial cells in wild-type mammary glands at 8 weeks expressed PRA, in agreement with previous findings [23, 24]. However, a two-fold decrease in the number of PRA-positive ductal epithelial cells was apparent in transgenic mammary glands. In the mouse mammary gland it is relevant that the progesterone receptor exists predominantly as the PRA isoform, and that the ratio of PRA to PRB is estimated to be 2:1 [25]. It has previously been shown that PRB is essential for tertiary side-branching in the mammary gland during puberty [26] and that PRA has the ability to suppress PRB-mediated mammary proliferation [27]. Interestingly, the majority of PRA-expressing epithelial cells do not proliferate in the virgin mammary gland, whereas PRB colocalises extensively with BrdU-labeled cells, a marker of proliferation [18, 23]. Thus the increased proliferation and aberrant side-branching observed in Deaf-1 transgenic mice may reflect an elevated PRB:PRA ratio, resulting from decreased expression of PRA in these glands. The PRA gene could not be identified as a target in the Affymetrix analysis since a specific probe for PRA does not exist. It therefore remains to be determined whether down-regulation of PRA expression by Deaf-1 occurs via a direct or indirect mechanism.

Interrogation of Affymetrix gene arrays revealed a small number of genes that were differentially expressed in Deaf-1-expressing MECs versus Deaf-1-null MECS. Only the top two genes exhibited a greater than two-fold change but all genes in Table 2 had high t statistic values. Elevated Rac3 levels in Deaf-1-expressing MECs could be demonstrated by real-time PCR analysis. Functional analysis of the promoter region of Rac3 revealed the presence of multiple Deaf-1 binding sites but luciferase reporter assays were inconclusive (data not shown). This does not preclude direct regulation of Rac3 by Deaf-1 via further upstream or downstream regulatory elements and requires more extensive analyses using a large genomic region spanning the entire Rac3 gene. Interestingly, mammary glands of Deaf-1 transgenic mice had increased levels of Rac3 mRNA compared to wild-type mammary glands. Thus, it appears that Rac3 may be a genuine target gene of Deaf-1. Recently, a study of transgenic mice expressing activated Rac3 in the mammary epithelium revealed that the glands underwent incomplete involution, with epithelial islands persisting up to nine months postpartum. These mice also developed benign mammary gland lesions [28]. We did not observe delayed involution in Deaf-1 transgenic mice analyzed. However, mice were only analyzed up to 12 days postpartum (data not shown). Further assessment of the relationship between Rac3 and Deaf-1 may require analysis of Deaf-1 transgenic mammary glands several months postpartum to determine whether Deaf-1 overexpression leads to altered mammary gland physiology.

Activated Rac3 has been linked to deregulated p21-activated kinase (Pak) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activities in human cancer cells [29]. Subsequently, activation of Rac3 was found to be critical for integrin and growth factor-mediated regulation of cellular migration and adhesion [30], which are important steps in the progression of metastatic disease. Depletion of Rac3 from BT549 breast carcinoma cells by RNAi strongly inhibited cell invasion revealing a role for this GTPase in breast cancer metastasis [31]. Intriguingly, these functions may parallel the proliferative, migratory and invasive functions ascribed to LMO4, a partner of DEAF-1, in human breast cancer cell lines [10]. Although Lmo4 transgenic mice develop hyperplasia and mammary intraepithelial neoplasia or adenosquamous carcinoma [10], overexpression of Deaf-1 did not lead to mammary tumors. Further insight may come from investigating Rac3 as a potential target gene of the endogenous DEAF-1/LMO4 protein complex in normal and cancerous breast epithelial cells.


Our data have revealed that the transcription factor DEAF-1 regulates the proliferation of human and mouse mammary epithelial cells. Enforced expression of Deaf-1 in transgenic mice led to increased proliferation and side-branching in post-pubertal mammary glands but was not oncogenic. Together with the perturbed PRA:PRB ratio and the known role of PR in side-branching, these data suggest that Deaf-1 may regulate the expression of PR. Finally, we have identified the small GTPase-encoding gene Rac3 as a potential target of Deaf-1 in the developing mammary gland.


Three-dimensional MCF10A assay

Stably transfected MCF10A-EcoR cells were passaged, and subjected to 3D assays in GFR Matrigel and indirect immunofluorescence as previously described [12]. Acini were incubated with primary antibodies (anti-Deaf-1 polyclonal antisera; diluted 1:50, anti-Ki67; diluted 1:300; Novo Castra) overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor®-conjugated anti-rabbit-488; Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was diluted 1:200. Nuclei were counterstained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA).

Generation and analysis of Deaf-1transgenic mice

A fragment encompassing an HA-tagged Deaf-1 cDNA was cloned downstream of a MMTV-LTR vector which also contained the simian virus 40 (SV40) untranslated (UTR) and poly(A) sequences [10]. The MMTV-HA-Deaf-1 plasmid was digested with SalI and SpeI to release the MMTV-HA-Deaf-1-SV40 fragment from the vector, and subsequently isolated by gel electrophoresis in a 0.7% low melting point agarose gel. The 7 kb fragment was microinjected into the pronucleus of FVB/N fertilised eggs, and these were then transferred to the oviducts of foster mothers (FVB/N). Genomic (tail) DNA from the founder mice was genotyped by PCR. Eleven founder mice were positive for the transgene and mated with wild-type FVB/N mice to obtain F1 generations. All animal experiments were conducted according to the WEHI Animal Ethics Committee guidelines.

Mammary glands were collected from adult female mice at different developmental time-points. Timed pregnancies were scored by observation of vaginal plugs, and confirmed by examination of embryos at the time of mammary gland collection. Lactation time-points corresponded to days post-parturition. Pups were removed after 10 days to initiate involution. The estrous cycle stage of virgin females was determined by vaginal smears, which were dried and stained with haematoxylin and eosin.

Southern blotting

Genomic tail DNA from founder mice was digested with HindIII, separated by electrophoresis, transferred to Hybond N+ membranes (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, England) and then hybridized to a 1.2 kb SV40 fragment labeled with [α-32P]-dCTP, using the DECAprime™II random primed DNA labeling kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Histological sections and mammary gland wholemounts

For histological sections, portions of the inguinal mammary gland were harvested and fixed overnight in 4% (w/v) PFA in PBS, pH 7.4, at 4°C. Mammary glands were then embedded in paraffin, and 1.5 μm sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin. For wholemount analysis, whole thoracic and inguinal mammary glands were fixed overnight in Carnoy's solution (60% ethanol, 30% chloroform, 10% acetic acid) before staining with haematoxylin.

Lysate preparation, immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis

Protein lysates from adult mouse organs and mammary epithelial cell cultures were prepared in KALB lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA; 50 mM Tris.HCl, pH 7.5;10 mM NaF; 1 mM Na3 VO4; 1% Triton X-100)containing Complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). For immunoprecipitation, 2 μl of anti-Deaf-1 polyclonal antisera was added to 500 μg of protein in a final volume of 200 μl KALB lysis buffer. Samples were incubated on ice for 2 hours before incubation with protein G sepharose beads, washing and Western blot analysis.

Tissue protein lysates (30 – 40 μg of total protein), whole cell lysates (10 – 25 μg of total protein) or immunoprecipitates were resolved on 4–20% Tris-glycine Novex pre-cast polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and transferred to Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (PVDF; Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) using the Novex transfer apparatus. Membranes were then probed with the following primary antibodies: anti-Deaf-1 rabbit polyclonal antisera which was raised against a 16-mer KLH-conjugated peptide (MEDSDSAAKQLQLAEC) located in the amino-terminal of murine Deaf-1 (also recognizes human DEAF-1) diluted 1:1,000, anti-HA rat monoclonal (3F10; Roche) diluted 1:750, and anti-tubulin mouse monoclonal (B-5-1-2; Sigma) diluted 1:5,000.

Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) immunodetection

Mice were injected with 0.5 mg/10 g body weight 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) Cell Labeling Reagent (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, England) 1 hr prior to tissue collection. For immunohistochemical detection of BrdU-labeled cells in mouse mammary glands, sections were treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide and permeabilized with 20 μg/ml proteinase K (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) followed by 0.2% Triton X-100. They were then incubated sequentially with rat anti-BrdU antibody (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA), biotinylated rabbit anti-rat IgG secondary antibody (Dako Cytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA), and HRP-conjugated strepdavidin (LSAB2; Dako Cytomation), before staining with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB; Dako Cytomation) and counterstaining with haematoxylin. For quantification of proliferating cells within the mammary glands of transgenic and wild-type mice, greater than 1,000 epithelial nuclei in 10 random fields (×400 magnification) were counted.

Immunohistochemistry of mouse mammary sections

Sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated and subjected to antigen retrieval by boiling in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0 for 20 min, before blocking in 10% normal goat serum (NGS). The primary antibodies, anti-PRa6 (anti-PRB) and anti-PRa7 (anti-PRA), kind gifts from C. Clarke and D. Graham, were diluted 1:40 and 1:80 respectively and incubated overnight at 4°C. For immunofluorescence, sections were incubated with anti-mouse-Alexa Flour®-594 (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), mounted with Fluorescent Mounting Medium (Dako Cytomation, Carpinteria, CA) and visualized by fluorescence microscopy. For immunohistochemistry, sections were incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories Inc, Burlingame, CA, USA) diluted 1:500. The tertiary step, counterstaining and quantification were carried out as described above.

Generation of mouse mammary epithelial cells and immunofluorescence

Mammary glands were harvested from 8 week-old female Deaf-1-/- mice and digested to obtain primary mammary epithelial cells (MECs). MECs were immortalized with an ecotropic retrovirus encoding human papilloma virus (HPV16) E6/E7 proteins as described in [32].

To analyze Deaf-1 expression, cells were plated on coverslips at 0.5 × 106 cells/plate in 6-well plates, infected with control or Deaf-1 retrovirus and then selected in puromycin (1.5 μg/ml) for 48 – 72 hr. Cells were incubated with anti-Deaf-1 rabbit polyclonal antibody before incubation with the anti-rabbit-FITC secondary antibody. Nuclei were counterstained with 4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and visualized by fluorescence microscopy.

Affymetrix analysis

RNA was purified using the QIAGEN RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and quality assessed by spectrophotometry and gel electrophoresis before hybridization to Affymetrix slides (GeneChip® Mouse Expression Set 430 2.0). Quality assessment for Affymetrix arrays is reviewed in [33] and was carried out in the Bioinformatics Department (WEHI, Melbourne, Australia). Gene symbols were obtained from the Affymetrix probe-set annotation file, version 25, 19 March 2008.

RT-PCR and Quantitative RT- PCR analysis

PCR was performed using 1 μl of cDNA and 50 ng of forward and reverse primers (Sigma-Genosys, Sydney, Australia; see Table 3). PCR conditions were as follows: 94°C for 2 min, followed by 30–35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 sec, annealing at x°C (see Table 3) for 45 sec and extension at 72°C for 45 sec, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.
Table 3

Primers for RT-PCR and quantitative real-time-PCR analysis



Sequence (5'-3')

Annealing Temp (x°C)

Amplicon size (bp)














65 (+ 5% glycerol)





Quantitative real-time PCR


Sequence (5'-3')


Amplicon size (bp)



















18S rRNA


















Quantitative RT-PCR assays were performed in a Rotor-Gene™ 6000 (Corbett Research, Mortlake, NSW, Australia) using 2 μl of cDNA in a 20 μl reaction volume containing 50 ng of each primer (Table 3) and 1 × SensiMix Plus SYBR®Green I Master reaction mix (Quantace Ltd, London, UK). The amplification program included an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 15 sec, annealing at 60°C for 30 sec, and extension at 72°C for 30 sec. The 18S rRNA and CK18 analyses were used for normalization to enable construction of standard curves. Relative concentrations were calculated using the delta CT method on the Rotor-Gene™ 6000 software.

Availability and requirements



We thank S. Holroyd for expert technical assistance, F. Vaillant for help in generating mammary epithelial preparations, S. Mihajlovic for histology, K. Johnston for animal husbandry, and D. Goode for assistance with microarray analysis. We also thank R. Sutherland for providing cells and C. Clarke for the PR antibodies. This work was supported by the Victorian Breast Cancer Research Consortium and the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). HEB received an Australian Postgraduate Award from the University of Melbourne.

Authors’ Affiliations

The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital


  1. Hennighausen L, Robinson GW: Signaling pathways in mammary gland development. Dev Cell. 2001, 1: 467-475. 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00064-8.View ArticlePubMed
  2. Howlin J, McBryan J, Martin F: Pubertal mammary gland development: insights from mouse models. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2006, 11: 283-297. 10.1007/s10911-006-9024-2.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ: Transcriptional regulators in mammary gland development and cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2003, 35: 1034-1051. 10.1016/S1357-2725(03)00030-X.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Gross CT, McGinnis W: DEAF-1, a novel protein that binds an essential region in a Deformed response element. EMBO J. 1996, 15: 1961-1970.PubMed CentralPubMed
  5. Huggenvik JI, Michelson RJ, Collard MW, Ziemba AJ, Gurley P, Mowen KA: Characterisation of a Nuclear Deformed Epidermal Autoregulatory Factor-1 (DEAF-1)- Related (NUDR) transcriptional regulator protein. Mol Endocrinol. 1998, 12: 1619-1639. 10.1210/me.12.10.1619.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Veraksa A, Kennison J, McGinnis W: DEAF-1 function is essential for the early embryonic development of Drosophila. Genesis. 2002, 33: 67-76. 10.1002/gene.10090.View ArticlePubMed
  7. Sugihara TM, Bach I, Kioussi C, Rosenfeld MG, Andersen B: Mouse deformed epidermal autoregulatory factor 1 recruits a LIM domain factor, LMO-4, and CLIM coregulators. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 15418-15423. 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15418.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
  8. Hahm K, Sum EY, Fujiwara Y, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE, Orkin SH: Defective neural tube closure and anteroposterior patterning in mice lacking the LIM protein LMO4 or its interacting partner Deaf-1. Mol Cell. 2004, 24: 2074-2082. 10.1128/MCB.24.5.2074-2082.2004.View Article
  9. Sum EY, Shackleton M, Hahm K, Thomas RM, O'Reilly LA, Wagner KU, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE: Loss of the LIM domain protein Lmo4 in the mammary gland during pregnancy impedes lobuloalveolar development. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 4820-4828. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208638.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Sum EY, Segara D, Duscio B, Bath ML, Field AS, Sutherland RL, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE: Overexpression of LMO4 induces mammary hyperplasia, promotes cell invasion, and is a predictor of poor outcome in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 7659-7664. 10.1073/pnas.0502990102.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
  11. Haataja L, Groffen J, Heisterkamp N: Characterisation of RAC3, a novel member of the Rho family. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 20384-20388. 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20384.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Debnath J, Muthuswamy SK, Brugge JS: Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Methods. 2003, 30: 256-268. 10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00032-X.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Basolo F, Elliott J, Tait L, Chen XQ, Maloney T, Russo IH, Pauley R, Momiki S, Caamano J, Klein-Szanto AJ, et al: Transformation of human breast epithelial cells by c-Ha-ras oncogene. Mol Carcinog. 1991, 4: 25-35. 10.1002/mc.2940040106.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Russo J, Tait L, Russo IH: Morphological expression of cell transformation induced by c-Ha- ras oncogene in human breast epithelial cells. J Cell Sci. 1991, 99 (Pt 2): 453-463.PubMed
  15. Pattengale PK, Stewart TA, Leder A, Sinn E, Muller W, Tepler I, Schmidt E, Leder P: Animal models of human disease. Pathology and molecular biology of spontaneous neoplasms occurring in transgenic mice carrying and expressing activated cellular oncogenes. Am J Pathol. 1989, 135: 39-61.PubMed CentralPubMed
  16. Atwood CS, Hovey RC, Glover JP, Chepko G, Ginsburg E, Robison WG, Vonderhaar BK: Progesterone induces side-branching of the ductal epithelium in the mammary glands of peripubertal mice. J Endocrinol. 2000, 167: 39-52. 10.1677/joe.0.1670039.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Brisken C, Heineman A, Chavarria T, Elenbaas B, Tan J, Dey SK, McMahon JA, McMahon AP, Weinberg RA: Essential function of Wnt-4 in mammary gland development downstream of progesterone signaling. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 650-654.PubMed CentralPubMed
  18. Kariagina A, Aupperlee MD, Haslam SZ: Progesterone receptor isoform functions in normal breast development and breast cancer. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2008, 18: 11-33.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
  19. Huseby RA, Soares MJ, Talamantes F: Ectopic pituitary grafts in mice: hormone levels, effects on fertility, and the development of adenomyosis uteri, prolactinomas, and mammary carcinomas. Endocrinology. 1985, 116: 1440-1448.View ArticlePubMed
  20. Soule HD, Maloney TM, Wolman SR, Peterson WD, Brenz R, McGrath CM, Russo J, Pauley RJ, Jones RF, Brooks SC: Isolation and characterisation of a spontaneously immortalised human breast epithelial cell line, MCF-10. Cancer Res. 1990, 50: 6075-6086.PubMed
  21. Wang N, Kudryavtseva E, Ch'en IL, McCormick J, Sugihara TM, Ruiz R, Andersen B: Expression of an engrailed-LMO4 fusion protein in mammary epithelial cells inhibits mammary gland development in mice. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 1507-1513. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207288.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Mailleux AA, Overholtzer M, Schmelzle T, Bouillet P, Strasser A, Brugge JS: BIM regulates apoptosis during mammary ductal morphogenesis, and its absence reveals alternative cell death mechanisms. Dev Cell. 2007, 12: 221-234. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.12.003.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
  23. Aupperlee MD, Smith KT, Kariagina A, Haslam SZ: Progesterone receptor isoforms A and B: temporal and spatial differences in expression during murine mammary gland development. Endocrinology. 2005, 146: 3577-3588. 10.1210/en.2005-0346.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Aupperlee MD, Haslam SZ: Differential hormonal regulation and function of progesterone receptor isoforms in normal adult mouse mammary gland. Endocrinology. 2007, 148: 2290-2300. 10.1210/en.2006-1721.View ArticlePubMed
  25. Schneider W, Ramachandran C, Satyaswaroop PG, Shyamala G: Murine progesterone receptor exists predominantly as the 83-kilodalton 'A' form. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1991, 38: 285-291. 10.1016/0960-0760(91)90099-Q.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Conneely OM, Mulac-Jericevic B, Lydon JP, De Mayo FJ: Reproductive function of the progesterone receptor isoforms: lessons from knock-out mice. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001, 179: 97-103. 10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00465-8.View ArticlePubMed
  27. Fernandez-Valdivia R, Mukherjee A, Mulac-Jericevic B, Conneely OM, DeMayo FJ, Amato P, Lydon JP: Revealing progesterone's role in uterine and mammary gland biology: insights from the mouse. Semin Reprod Med. 2005, 23: 22-37. 10.1055/s-2005-864031.View ArticlePubMed
  28. Leung K, Nagy A, Gonzalez-Gomez I, Groffen J, Heisterkamp N, Kaartinen V: Targeted expression of activated Rac3 in mammary epithelium leads to defective postlactational involution and benign mammary gland lesions. Cells Tissues Organs. 2003, 175: 72-83. 10.1159/000073751.View ArticlePubMed
  29. Mira JP, Benard V, Groffen J, Sanders LC, Knaus UG: Endogenous, hyperactive Rac3 controls proliferation of breast cancer cells by a p21-activated kinase-dependent pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 185-189. 10.1073/pnas.97.1.185.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
  30. Ridley AJ, Schwartz MA, Burridge K, Firtel RA, Ginsberg MH, Borisy G, Parsons JT, Horwitz AR: Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science. 2003, 302: 1704-1709. 10.1126/science.1092053.View ArticlePubMed
  31. Chan AY, Coniglio SJ, Chuang YY, Michaelson D, Knaus UG, Philips MR, Symons M: Roles of the Rac1 and Rac3 GTPases in human tumour cell invasion. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 7821-7829. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208909.View ArticlePubMed
  32. Sutherland KD, Vaillant F, Alexander WS, Wintermantel TM, Forrest NC, Holroyd SL, McManus EJ, Schutz G, Watson CJ, Chodosh LA, et al: c-myc as a mediator of accelerated apoptosis and involution in mammary glands lacking Socs3. EMBO J. 2006, 25: 5805-5815. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601455.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMed
  33. Bolstad BM, Collin F, Brettschneider J, Simpson K, Cope L, Irizarry RA, Speed TP: Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor. 2005, Springer


© Barker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.