Open Access

Endothelial-specific ablation of Serum Response Factor causes hemorrhaging, yolk sac vascular failure, and embryonic lethality

BMC Developmental Biology20088:65

DOI: 10.1186/1471-213X-8-65

Received: 25 July 2007

Accepted: 20 June 2008

Published: 20 June 2008

Abstract

Background

Serum response factor (SRF), a member of the MADS box family of nuclear transcription factors, plays an important role in cardiovascular development and function. Numerous studies demonstrate a central role for SRF in regulating smooth and cardiac muscle cell gene expression. Consistent with this, loss of SRF function blocks differentiation of coronary vascular smooth muscle cells from proepicardial precursors, indicating SRF is necessary for coronary vasculogenesis. The role of SRF in endothelial cell contribution during early vascular development, however, has not been addressed. To investigate this, we generated transgenic mice lacking expression of SRF in endothelial cells. Mice expressing Cre recombinase (Tie2Cre+) under Tie2 promoter control were bred to mice homozygous for Srf alleles containing loxP recombination sites within the Srf gene (Srff/f). Tie2 is a tyrosine kinase receptor expressed predominantly on endothelial cells that mediates signalling during different stages of blood vessel remodelling. Resulting embryos were harvested at specific ages for observation of physical condition and analysis of genotype.

Results

Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fembryos appeared to develop normally compared to wild-type littermates until embryonic day 10.5 (E10.5). Beginning at E11.5, Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fembryos exhibited cerebrovascular hemorrhaging and severely disrupted vascular networks within the yolk sac. Hemorrhaging in mutant embryos became more generalized with age, and by E14.5, most Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fembryos observed were nonviable and grossly necrotic. Hearts of mutant embryos were smaller relative to overall body weight compared to wild-type littermates. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed the presence of vascular endothelial cells; however, vessels failed to undergo appropriate remodelling. Initial analysis by electron microscopy suggested a lack of appropriate cell-cell contacts between endothelial cells. Consistent with this, disrupted E-cadherin staining patterns were observed in mutant embryos.

Conclusion

These results provide the first in vivo evidence in support of a role for SRF in endothelial cell function and strongly suggest SRF is required for appropriate vascular remodelling.

Background

Serum response factor (SRF) is a nuclear transcription factor of the MADS (MCM1, Agamous, Deficiens, SRF) box family. SRF interacts as a dimer with DNA at the serum response element (SRE), a 10 base pair AT-rich sequence [CC(AT)6GG] also known as the CArG box (for review see [1, 2]). The SRE sequence is present in a wide variety of genes, including those encoding for immediate early proteins (e.g. Fos, Jun, HSP70), neuronal nuclear receptors (e.g. Nurr1, Nur77) and numerous contractile and cytoskeletal proteins (eg. actins, myosins). Expression of SRF is essential in early development as SRF-null embryos die during gastrulation [3]. SRF is required for development of mesoderm [3]. The expression pattern of genes under SRF control is regulated in a combinatorial fashion by SRF's ability to interact with a variety of accessory factors such as Elk-1 and SAP-1 to regulate expression of genes involved in cell growth and proliferation, and myocardin and related family factors to control myogenic gene expression (for review see [4]).

SRF plays a critical role in myogenesis. Early studies established the expression of SRF in cells of the myogenic lineage [57], and SRF has been shown to be required for appropriate skeletal, cardiac and smooth muscle cell growth and differentiation [8, 9]. SRF gene knockout studies from our laboratory indicate that disruption of SRF in cardiomyocytes leads to severe defects in the contractile apparatus, including Z-disc and stress fiber formation, as well as mislocalization and/or attenuation of sarcomeric protein expression [10]. Consistent with these observations, in vivo cardiovascular-specific knockout of SRF results in embryonic death via cardiovascular failure due to perturbations in normal muscle cytoarchitecture and contractile assembly [1113]. Numerous studies suggest that disordered myogenic gene expression is due to defective SRF-mediated regulation of the smooth muscle cell-specific regulatory factor myocardin [1416].

SRF is a key regulator in development of the coronary vasculature. Coronary vasculature is derived from a transient embryonic structure termed the proepicardium (PE) [1719]. The PE is characterized as a small, grape cluster-like aggregate of cells developing at embryonic day 9 (E9) from an extension of the septum transversum, lying beneath the developing heart tube [20]. Cells of the PE undergo an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and migrate over the surface of the heart. Some cells form the primitive epicardium, and others appear to continue to infiltrate into the subepicardial space. Once dispersed into the heart tissue, these subepicardial mesenchymal cells (SEMC) differentiate into the vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) and vascular endothelial cells (VEC) that comprise the coronary vasculature [18]. Previous work in our laboratory has demonstrated expression of SRF within cells of the PE and newly formed coronary vessels [21]. Landerholm and colleagues [22] have shown that inhibitory SRF constructs block differentiation of avian PE to VSMC, indicating a central role for SRF in differentiation of PE-derived cells to VSMC.

A role for SRF in differentiation and function of VSMC is well established, however, little is known about the role of SRF in VEC [5, 23]. Using primary HUVEC cultures, Chai and colleagues [24] have shown that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling pathways require SRF. Endothelial cells in which SRF has been knocked down fail to respond to intercellular VEGF signalling and show abolished VEGF-induced in vitro angiogenesis, impaired endothelial cell migration and proliferation, and inhibited VEGF-induced actin polymerization and immediate early gene expression.

These studies indicate that SRF likely plays an important role in endothelial cell function. The in vivo role of endothelial SRF, however, has not been addressed. Therefore, in the current study we investigated the role of SRF in VEC function by carrying out endothelial cell-specific ablation of the SRF gene. Mice homozygous for Srf-Lox P (Srff/f) alleles were bred to mice expressing the Cre recombinase protein under Tie2 promoter control (Tie2Cre+/-). Tie2 is a vascular endothelial-specific tyrosine kinase receptor for the angiopoietin family of vascular remodelling factors [25, 26]. The onset of Tie2Cre expression is concurrent with the appearance of endothelium in E7.5 embryos and continues in adult tissues [27]. In embryos expressing the mutant genotype Tie2Cre+/-Srff/f, we observed hemorrhaging by E11.5 and near complete lethality by E14.5. Examination of cardiac morphology revealed smaller hearts as well as mild ventricular-septal defects in mutant embryos as compared to wild-type littermates. Immunohistochemical analysis suggests VEC properly differentiated and assembled blood vessels. However, the appearance of blood pools and segmented blood vessels observed in embryos and yolk sacs of E11.5–E13.5 embryos indicated disrupted vascular networks consistent with a defect in vascular remodelling. Further analysis of yolk sac tissues by electron microscopy demonstrated a lack of desmosomal-type junction complexes as well as a paucity of collagen matrix between the endodermal and mesodermal cell layers. E-cadherin protein detected by immunofluorescence showed a dramatic decrease in signal along the apical brush-border of endothelial cells in the extraembryonic endodermal layer in yolk sac. These results provide the first in vivo evidence in support of a role for SRF in endothelial cell function and strongly suggest SRF is required for appropriate vascular remodelling.

Results

Conditional ablation of SRF protein in endothelium causes hemorrhaging in developing embryos

Inspection of embryos harvested from Tie2Cre+/-Srff/+ × Srff/fmatings revealed internal hemorrhaging and blood pooling consistent with loss of vascular organization (see Figures 1 and 2). Mutant embryos appeared to develop normally until E10.5 (compare Fig. 1A and 1B). However, by E11.5 embryos expressing the mutant genotype Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fbegan to exhibit internal hemorrhaging (Fig. 1D, arrowhead). The extent of bleeding continued to progress with embryonic age (Fig. 1D, F, &1H). Wild-type littermates showed intact vascular formation in contrast to mutant embryos (compare Fig. 1G and 1H). Upon closer examination, loss of vascular formation in the mutant embryos becomes more obvious (see Figure 2). A striking difference in the lack of apparent intact vasculature was observed in Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fembryos compared to wild-type littermates (Fig. 2, compare arrows in A and B, C and D, E and F, and G and H). Blood pooling noted in mutant embryos (Fig. 2B and 2F, asterisks) supports a loss of vascular integrity.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-8-65/MediaObjects/12861_2007_Article_349_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Tie2Cre +/- Srff/fembryos exhibit internal hemorrhaging. Photographs of whole unfixed, unstained mouse embryos at E10.5 (A, B), E11.5 (C, D), E12.5 (E, F) and E13.5 (G, H). Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fmutant embryos (B, D, F, H) exhibited internal hemorrhaging compared to wild-type littermates (A, C, E, G). This effect progressed with increasing gestational age. E14.5 mutant embryos were grossly necrotic and unsuitable for analysis. Labelled boxes in Fig. 1 correspond to images in Fig. 2.; Lv = liver. Arrowhead marks minimal hemorrhaging observed in E11.5 embryos.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-8-65/MediaObjects/12861_2007_Article_349_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Vascular fragmentation and internal hemorrhaging in Tie2Cre +/- Srff/fembryos. Higher magnification photographs of whole unfixed, unstained mouse embryos as in Figure 1; embryos were examined at E12.5 (A, B) and E13.5 (C-H). Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fmutant embryos (B, D, F, H) exhibited blood pooling (asterisks) and loss of visible vascular structures (arrowheads mark similar vessels; compare A & B, C & D, E & F, and G & H).

Endothelial-specific disruption of the Srfgene during development causes embryonic lethality

The effect of endothelial-specific conditional ablation of SRF protein expression during embryonic development was evaluated. Loss of SRF expression in endothelial cells was achieved by Tie2 driven-Cre recombinase-mediated excision of the promoter region and first exon of Srf [11]. The conditional loss of Srf gene function in endothelial cells resulted in embryonic death by E14.5 (see Table 1). The majority of animals expressing the mutant genotype Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fdisplayed an abnormal phenotype, and all necrotic embryos collected expressed the mutant genotype. No animals with a mutant genotype were detected in late gestation or at birth.
Table 1

Embryos with mutant genotype Tie2·Cre+/-Srff/fdie by E14.5

Age

Cre+/Srff/f

Cre+/Srff/+

Cre-/Srff/f

Cre-/Srff/+

E9.5

7 (0)

5

10

16

E10.5

12 (0)

14 (1)

15

26

E11.5

19 (1)

29 (2)

7

17

E12.5

24 (11)

21

17

7

E13.5

21 (19)

15

14 (2)

16

E14.5

10 (8)

3

3

4

E18.5

2 (2)

4

2

5

Neonate

0

18

20

13

Genotypic analysis of mouse embryos generated by crossing Tie2Cre+/-Srff/+ male mice with Srff/ffemale mice. Numbers represent total embryos of each genotype; numbers in parentheses indicate mutant phenotype and grossly necrotic embryos. The conditional loss of Srf gene function in endothelial cells resulted in embryonic death by E14.5; no animals with mutant genotype were detected during late gestational age or at birth.

Hearts of Tie2Cre+/-Srf f/f mutant embryos are smaller

Since SRF plays a central role in cardiac development, we examined cardiac morphology of mutant embryos and their wild-type littermates to ascertain whether observed embryonic lethality was due to abnormal cardiac morphogenesis. Embryos harvested from timed-pregnant female mice were subjected to fixation for analysis of morphology or for quantification of whole body and isolated heart weights. Hearts of wild-type embryos correctly formed atrial and ventricular chambers, and major vessels of the atrial tree were present (see Figure 3). In contrast, the muscular portion of the interventricular septum in hearts of Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fmutant genotype embryos appeared reduced (Fig. 3B and 3D), potentially resulting in ventricular-septal defects. Furthermore, enlarged vessels were observed in mutant embryos, presumably due to edema caused by vascular insufficiency (Fig. 3B and 3D, asterisks). Analysis of endocardial cushion extracellular matrix deposition revealed no difference between wild-type and mutant littermates (alcian blue staining; data not shown).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-8-65/MediaObjects/12861_2007_Article_349_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Hearts in mutant embryos are smaller and dysmorphic. Photomicrographs (40×) of transverse sections of mouse embryos at E12.5 (A, B) and E13.5 (C, D) stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fembryos exhibited reduced heart size by E12.5 (B, compare to A), which became more pronounced and consistent at E13.5 (D, compare to C). (E) Quantitation of heart size normalized to overall body weight revealed smaller hearts in both E12.5 (1.5 ± 0.4 vs. 1.08 ± 0.5, wild-type vs. mutant respectively; p = 0.054) and E13.5 embryos (1.4 ± 0.39% vs. 1.04 ± 0.17%, wild-type vs. mutant respectively; p = 0.021). Enlarged vessels apparently caused by edema due to vascular insufficiency were also noted in mutant embryos (asterisks). LV = left ventricle. Scale bar: 200 μm.

Hearts of mutant embryos appeared smaller than those of wild-type littermates. To assess this observation, whole body and isolated heart weights from E12.5 and E13.5 embryos were used to calculate heart weights as a percentage of overall body weight (Fig. 3E). The decrease in apparent size of mutant hearts appeared as early as E12.5 (compare Fig. 3A with 3B); however, differences in whole body and heart weights at this age did not reach statistical significance (1.5 ± 0.4 vs. 1.08 ± 0.5, wild-type vs. mutant respectively; p = 0.054). Normalized heart weights from E13.5 mutant embryos were reduced (1.4 ± 0.39% vs. 1.04 ± 0.17%, wild-type vs. mutant respectively; p = 0.021). Furthermore, immunofluorescent analysis of phosphorylated histone H3 in E11.5 embryos revealed an apparent reduction in the number of endocardial endothelial cells undergoing proliferation (see Additional file 1); no difference in apoptotic activity was detected (cleaved caspase 3 immunofluorescent analysis; data not shown). In contrast, the ratio of cardiomyocytes to total cells was not different between wild-type and mutant heart tissues (MF-20-immunolabelled cells as a percentage of total DAPI-positive nuclei; data not shown), suggesting that the heart size differences noted are not due to a selective loss of cardiomyocytes. E14.5 embryos with mutant genotype were grossly necrotic and unsuitable for analysis.

Yolk sac vasculature fails in Tie2Cre+/-Srf f/f mutant embryos

The Tie2Cre construct is expressed in blood islands and hemangioblasts within the extraembryonic yolk sac as early as E7.5 [27]. Ablation of SRF protein expression in yolk sac endothelial tissues caused blood vessel disorganization and subsequent vascular failure (see Figures 4 and 5). Yolk sac blood vessels appeared normal in both wild-type and mutant animals until E11.5 (compare Fig. 4A and 4B, C and 4D). In contrast, the yolk sacs of E12.5 and E13.5 mutant embryos contained blood pools and fragmented blood vessels (Fig. 4F and 4H), consistent with impaired vascular remodelling. Closer examination revealed a web of poorly organized vessels (Fig. 5, compare arrowheads in 5A, C, and 5E with 5B, D, and 5F).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-8-65/MediaObjects/12861_2007_Article_349_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Tie2Cre +/- Srff/fembryos exhibit yolk sac vascular failure. Photographs of whole unfixed, unstained intact yolk sacs containing mouse embryos at E10.5 (A, B), E11.5 (C, D), E12.5 (E, F) and E13.5 (G, H). Embryos with Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fgenotype exhibited severely disrupted vascular networks at E12.5 (F) and E13.5 (H) as compared to wild-type littermates (E and G respectively). Labelled boxes in Fig. 4 correspond to images in Fig. 5.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-8-65/MediaObjects/12861_2007_Article_349_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Yolk sac tissues of Tie2Cre +/- Srff/fembryos display vascular disintegration and blood pooling. Photographs of whole unfixed, unstained intact yolk sacs containing mouse embryos at E12.5 (A, B, C, D) and E13.5 (E, F). Yolk sac tissues from mutant embryos showed disorganized vascular networks at E12.5 (B) that become more pronounced at E13.5 (D, F arrowheads). Blood pools (B, asterisks) were also observed in mutant yolk sac tissues.

SRF protein is localized within endothelial cells

To establish the expression of SRF within VEC of the coronary vasculature, we performed double-label immunofluorescent analysis of embryonic mouse heart. Ventricular tissue was isolated from wild-type E16.5 mouse embryos, after coronary vessels have formed; corresponding Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fsamples were not obtainable as affected embryos die by E14.5. Sections of paraffin-embedded ventricular tissue were immunolabelled for both PECAM-1 and SRF proteins and examined by confocal laser microscopy (see Figure 6). PECAM-1-stained endothelial cells were clearly visible surrounding vessels in ventricular myocardium as well as surrounding the myocardial wall (Fig. 6A, arrowheads). Cardiomyocytes showed robust SRF staining (Fig. 6A, asterisks). Higher magnification imaging of a single focal plane showed nuclear-localized SRF immunostaining (Fig. 6B, asterisks) surrounded by PECAM-1 labelled endothelial cell membranes (Fig. 6B, arrowheads).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-8-65/MediaObjects/12861_2007_Article_349_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Detection of SRF protein within vascular endothelial cells. Single-plane confocal laser photomicrographs (A-630×, B-1,000×) of ventricular tissue from wild-type E16.5 mouse heart immunolabelled with the VEC marker PECAM-1 (red) and SRF (green). (A) PECAM-1-stained cells surround vessels as well as form the epicardium (arrowheads). Cardiomyocytes within ventricular tissue show strong SRF staining (asterisks). (B) Endothelial cell-specific PECAM-1 (red; arrowheads) encircles the nuclear-localized SRF protein (green; asterisks). Scale bars: A = 40 μm; B = 4 μm.

SRF protein is decreased in VEC from Tie2Cre+/-Srf f/f embryos

We analyzed embryonic vascular tissues using double-label immunofluorescence microscopy to verify the loss of SRF protein in affected cells (see Figure 7). Tissues from E10.5 wild-type (Fig. 7A and 7B) and mutant (Fig. 7C and 7D) embryos were labelled with antibodies against SRF and the VEC-marker PECAM-1 and analyzed by confocal laser microscopy. Single-plane confocal images of blood vessels were used to count the total number of VEC and the number of VEC exhibiting SRF. Only those cells showing SRF signal completely encircled by PECAM-1 staining were scored as SRF-positive VEC (Fig. 7B, arrowhead). Final numbers were expressed as percent SRF-positive VEC of the total counted for that vessel. A high proportion of VEC in wild-type vessels were positive for SRF (84% ± 14.3) compared to mutant vessels (25% ± 15.7; p < 0.0000004; Fig. 7E).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-8-65/MediaObjects/12861_2007_Article_349_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

SRF protein is decreased in endothelial tissues of Tie2Cre +/- Srff/fembryos. Photomicrographs (A, C:1,000×; B, D:4,000×) of cross-sections of blood vessels from E10.5 wild-type (A, B) and mutant (C, D) embryos were used to count the total number of VEC and the number of VEC exhibiting SRF (boxes in A, C correspond to images in C, D respectively). Tissues were labelled with antibodies against SRF (green) and the VEC-marker PECAM-1 (red) and analyzed using single-plane confocal laser microscopy (blue = Topro3 nuclear staining). Only those cells showing SRF signal completely encircled by PECAM-1 staining were scored as SRF-positive VEC (B, D arrowheads). Not all VEC displayed detectable SRF protein (A, arrow). Final numbers were expressed as percent SRF-positive VEC of the total counted for that vessel (E): 84 ± 14.3 vs. 25 ± 15.7, wild-type vs. mutant respectively; *p = 0.0000004, student's t test. Scale bars: A, C = 30 μm; B, D = 10 μm.

Since the Tie2Cre construct has been shown to be expressed in endocardial endothelial cells, we analyzed embryonic ventricular tissue for the presence or absence of SRF protein using single-plane confocal images as described above (see Additional file 2). We found a higher number of endocardial endothelial cells exhibiting SRF-positive immunofluorescence in wild-type as compared to mutant tissues. No significant change in expression of SRF protein was observed between wild-type or mutant embryos in the epicardium (Additional file 2). Furthermore, to verify that SRF protein expression in cardiomyocytes was not grossly affected by loss of SRF in endothelial cells, we analyzed SRF protein expression in embryonic heart tissues by immunodetection; however, no differences were noted (Additional file 2).

Early coronary vessel formation appears normal in mutant embryos

Coronary vessels begin to form at approximately E11.5, with the coronary vascular network complete by E16.5 [28]. We examined early coronary vessel formation by whole-mount immunohistochemical analysis of hearts from E12.5 embryos (see Figure 8). We used the VEC-specific cell-surface marker PECAM-1 to label vascular structures in hearts from both wild-type and Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fembryos. Vessels on the external ventral (Fig. 8A and 8B) and dorsal (Fig. 8C and 8D) surfaces are visible and seem intact in both wild-type and Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fembryos. This observation indicates that initial formation of the coronary vasculature is not affected by loss of SRF in endothelial cells. However, we were unable to complete assessment of the angiogenic remodelling responsible for maturation of the coronary vascular network in mutant embryos as they die and become grossly necrotic by E14.5.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-8-65/MediaObjects/12861_2007_Article_349_Fig8_HTML.jpg
Figure 8

Early coronary vessel development in Tie2Cre +/- Srff/fembryos appears normal compared to wild-type littermates. Photographs of whole-mount immunostained wild-type (A, C) and Tie2Cre+/-Srff/f(B, D) hearts. Samples were stained with the endothelial cell marker PECAM-1 to detect vascular structures. Vessels on ventral (A, B) and dorsal (C, D) heart surfaces were clearly visible, indicating apparently normal assembly of initial coronary vasculature. LV = left ventricle.

Yolk sac tissues from Tie2Cre+/-Srf f/f embryos retain VEC despite fragmentation of blood vessels

The Tie2Cre construct is expressed in endodermal tissue layers of the yolk sac as well as in VEC. Yolk sac vascular networks undergo extensive remodelling during the course of embryogenesis. Based on our observation of fragmented yolk sac vessels, we sought to determine the status of VEC within yolk sac tissues. We looked for the presence of VEC within yolk sac tissues by immunolabelling whole mount samples of E13.5 wild-type and Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fyolk sac tissues with the VEC marker PECAM-1 (see Figure 9). Yolk sac tissues from embryos lacking SRF in endothelium demonstrated the presence of appropriately differentiated VEC; however, blood vessels in SRF-null yolk sac tissues were almost completely disintegrated by this age. Remnants of presumed blood vessels could still be seen (Fig. 9B, arrowheads), suggesting incomplete vessel remodelling or inappropriate maintenance of existing vessels.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-8-65/MediaObjects/12861_2007_Article_349_Fig9_HTML.jpg
Figure 9

Tie2Cre +/- Srff/fyolk sac tissues show loss of blood vessel integrity and separation of dermal layers. Yolk sac tissues immunostained with VEC-specific marker PECAM-1 to label endothelial cells and vascular structures. Photographs of wild-type (A) and Tie2Cre+/-Srff/f(B) whole yolk sac at E13.5; arrowheads (B) mark apparent blood vessel remnants in mutant yolk sac tissue. Photomicrographs (200×) of cross-sections of wild-type (C) and Tie2Cre+/-Srff/f(D and E) yolk sac at E13.5 immunolabelled for PECAM-1 (brown-gray = PECAM-1, red = neutral red counterstain). Normal cellular layers of endoderm (Ed) and extraembryonic mesoderm (Md) are tightly associated in wild-type as compared to mutant yolk sac tissue. Asterisks mark areas of inappropriate tissue layer separation in Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fyolk sac (D). (E) Quantitation of laminar separation in cross-sections of yolk sac tissues as in C and D revealed increased delamination in mutant animals (16.3 ± 10.8% vs. 62.0 ± 10.4%, wild-type vs. mutant respectively; p = 0.0031). Scale bar: C, D = 50 μm.

Furthermore, cross-sectional examination of Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fyolk sac tissues revealed delamination of the endodermal and mesodermal components of the yolk sac layers (Fig. 9C and 9D). Tissues immunolabelled by the VEC marker PECAM-1 showed separation of the endodermal and mesodermal tissues (compare Fig. 9C and 9D, asterisks). Also, some areas of laminar separation were observed to contain blood cells, suggesting these areas derived from either blood vessels or blood islands. Quantitation of the linear length of laminar separation in cross-sections shows that yolk sac tissues from mutant animals have a greater degree of laminar separation than wild-type littermates (see Fig. 9E; 16.3 ± 10.8% vs. 62.0 ± 10.4% wild-type vs. mutant; p = 0.003).

Mutant yolk sac tissues lack cell-cell junctions and intra-laminar collagen deposition

Samples of yolk sac tissues from wild-type and Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fembryos were processed for analysis by transmission electron microscopy (see Figure 10). Wild-type tissues contained desmosomal-type junction complexes that were absent in Tie2Cre+/-Srff/ftissues (Fig. 10B, arrowheads; compare to Fig. 10E). Furthermore, collagen deposition in the extracellular matrix between the endodermal and mesodermal yolk sac layers was greatly diminished (Fig. 10C, arrowheads; compare to Fig. 10F). Sub-cellular elements of both endodermal and mesodermal cells in mutant tissue appeared largely normal, and did not display signs of necrosis nor apoptotic bodies. This observation suggests that the loss of cell-cell adhesion complexes is not due to gross disintegration of the yolk sac tissue as a whole, but rather is a consequence of SRF deprivation.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-8-65/MediaObjects/12861_2007_Article_349_Fig10_HTML.jpg
Figure 10

Lack of junctional complexes and collagen deposition revealed by electron microscopy analysis of yolk sac tissues. Yolk sac tissues from wild-type (A, B, C) and Tie2Cre+/-Srff/f(D, E, F) embryos were subjected to transmission electron microscopy to assess ultrastructural detail. Desmosomal-type junctional complexes are observed in wild-type tissue (B arrowheads) but not in mutant tissue (E). Intralaminar collagen deposition occurs normally between endodermal and mesodermal cell layers in wild-type (A, C) but not mutant (D, F) tissues. Arrowheads in C denote longitudinal and cross-sectional views of individual collagen fibrils. Boxes in A and D correspond to images in B and E, respectively; asterisks in A and D correspond to images in C and F, respectively; scale bars: A, D = 1 μm; B, C, E, F = 0.2 μm.

E-Cadherin is decreased in Tie2Cre+/-Srf f/f embryonic yolk sac tissues

We sought to confirm our electron microscopy observations by immunofluorescent labelling of junctional complexes by E-cadherin (see Figure 11). Wild-type and Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fyolk sac tissues were double-labelled with the endothelial cell marker PECAM-1 and E-cadherin and subjected to fluorescent microscopy for analysis. Wild-type endodermal cells displayed intense E-cadherin localization along the apical brush-border surface, a staining pattern largely absent from mutant tissues (compare Fig. 11A and 11B). Closer examination by confocal laser microscopy confirmed the lack of detectable E-cadherin (compare Fig. 11C and 11D, arrowheads).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-8-65/MediaObjects/12861_2007_Article_349_Fig11_HTML.jpg
Figure 11

E-Cadherin localization is disrupted in yolk sac tissues of Tie2Cre +/- Srff/fembryos. Photomicrographs of wild-type (A, C; 400×) and mutant (B, D; 2,000×) yolk sac tissues stained for PECAM (red) and E-cadherin (green). Immunofluorescent analysis revealed a decrease in detectable E-cadherin protein in mutant samples. Robust E-cadherin staining is observed in the endodermal (Ed) but not mesodermal (Md) layer of wild-type yolk sac (A). In contrast, very little E-cadherin staining can be detected in yolk sac from Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fembryos (B). Single-plane confocal microscopy (C, D; 4,000×) confirms the lack of E-cadherin immunostaining at the apical brush-border surface of mutant yolk sac endodermal cells (compare A and B, arrowheads). Blue stain in A and B is DAPI nuclear stain. Scale bars: A, B = 50 μm; C, D = 7.5 μm.

Discussion

Numerous studies have shown that SRF is a critical transcriptional regulator of genes important for VSMC differentiation and development, and therefore a key regulator of vascular development. Consistent with this, SRF is required for differentiation of PE-derived precursors to VSMC during coronary vascular development [22]. We have previously shown, however, that SRF is expressed in the PE prior to detectable expression of VSMC markers [21], raising the possibility that SRF may play a role in differentiation of PE-derived coronary VEC as well. To begin to address this idea, we have sought to investigate the role of SRF in endothelial cells in vivo, and whether endothelial SRF is required for normal vascular development. Towards that end, we crossed mice expressing Cre recombinase under the VEC-specific Tie2-derived promoter with mice carrying floxed Srf alleles. Our data demonstrate that SRF plays a crucial role in appropriate VEC function beginning early in embryonic development.

Mutant embryos lacking SRF expression in VEC die by E14.5. Examination of heart structure reveals that hearts of Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fembryos undergo looping and chamber formation; however, hearts of mutant embryos are measurably smaller with increasing gestational age compared to wild-type littermates. We did not detect a difference in the percentage of cardiomyocytes in heart tissue between wild-type and mutant embryos despite noting a small decrease in cardiomyocyte proliferation. Analysis of apoptotic activity by cleaved caspase 3 immunoreactivity also showed no discernible difference between wild-type and mutant embryos. Based on the well-documented specificity of the Tie2Cre driver, it is unlikely that the small decrease in cardiomyocyte proliferation observed is due to direct Cre-mediated excision of the Srf allele in cardiomyocytes [27]. One possible explanation for the reduction in cardiomyocyte proliferation in mutant embryos is that there is a defect in signalling to cardiomyocytes. In support of this idea, a variety of studies have demonstrated the importance of reciprocal signalling pathways between endocardial endothelial cells and the developing myocardium (for review see [29]). This raises the possibility that impaired signalling from SRF-null endocardial endothelial cells is contributing to reduced cardiomyocyte proliferation and the overall decrease in heart size observed in Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fembryos. The apparent reduction in endocardial cell proliferation we observed in mutant embryos further suggests that loss of SRF in endothelial cells results in impaired endocardial endothelial cell function; however, which endothelial signalling pathways are impaired in SRF-null cells remains to be determined.

Endocardial cushion tissues are present; however, septal tissues appear poorly formed in mutant embryos, and in some cases exhibit a failure to form ventricular septa. Nevertheless, in utero lethality lacking gross defects in heart structure supports the idea of vascular failure as a cause of death. Lethal vessel malfunction may be occurring within the atrial tree, embryonic or extra-embryonic vasculature, or yolk sac vasculature. Consistent with this, mutant embryos exhibit hemorrhaging within the head, abdomen, and limbs as early as E12.5, a time when blood vessel remodelling is occurring. Yolk sac vasculature is also disrupted, suggesting a common mechanism of vessel malfunction in both embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues.

Initial vessel formation in the heart begins at approximately E11.5 and is completed with establishment of mature coronary arteries by E16.5 [28]. Early coronary vasculogenesis appears to occur normally in embryos lacking SRF in VEC as shown by the presence of PECAM-1-positive vessels in hearts from both wild-type and mutant E12.5 embryos. Nevertheless, mutant embryos die by E14.5, leaving the issue of SRF's role in coronary vasculature remodelling and maturation unclear. Determining the precise requirement for SRF in VEC specification is also complex since the Tie2Cre construct begins expression presumably after hemangioblast specification. Examination of blood smears from E12.5 embryos reveals no grossly observable differences between wild-type and mutant samples (data not shown). This may suggest that early VEC progenitors in the yolk sac are not influenced by excision of the Srf gene; however since the SRF protein has a relatively long half-life [30], we cannot rule out the possibility that residual SRF protein levels remain sufficient to sustain specification and differentiation of early VEC. These questions are better suited to investigation using in vitro model systems of VEC specification and differentiation, and are the object of ongoing studies.

While it is evident that SRF protein levels are reduced in VEC of mutant embryos, detectable SRF protein in both wild-type and Tie2Cre+/-Srff/fembryos suggests a significant degree of mosaicism. Also, the stringency of our method for quantitation of SRF protein in VEC may result in an underestimation of the number of cells displaying detectable SRF protein. We have observed varying degrees of Srf-floxed allele excision efficiency based on the Cre recombinase driver, as well as possible variability from cell to cell. This results in a mosaic expression pattern between individual cells; however, the phenotypic effects of the excision still manifest in the tissue as a whole. Nevertheless, it is likely that more complete ablation may result in a more severe phenotype.

Yolk sac vascular networks undergo extensive remodelling during the course of embryogenesis. In our study, yolk sac vascular networks appear to form normally, echoing what was observed in initial coronary vessel development. However, yolk sac vascular networks became severely disrupted by E12.5, indicating a failure of the blood vessels to remodel and mature. Disintegration of yolk sac vasculature was accompanied by separation of endodermal and mesodermal cell layers. Further analysis revealed a lack of desmosomal junctions and intralaminar collagen as well as dramatic loss of E-cadherin in cells of the endodermal layer. Anchoring-type desmosomal junctions are plentiful in tissues subject to persistent mechanical stress, such as yolk sac, skin, and heart. Proper junction formation relies on appropriate expression of cytoskeletal and cell surface anchoring proteins such as actins, cadherins, and integrins. Recent work in our laboratory has shown that SRF-null cardiomyocytes have decreased levels of a number of genes associated with cell adhesion and cytoskeletal function including integrins β1 and α9, tight junction protein ZO-1, and protocadherins 7 and 18 [10], raising the possibility that the same genes may be affected in SRF-null endothelial cells, resulting in deficient cell-cell contacts.

Previous research has shown cadherins are also required for pericyte-endothelial interactions during angiogenic sprouting [31]. Furthermore, VE-cadherin, a major component of adherens junctions between endothelial cells, has been shown to promote angiogenesis [32]. Consistent with these findings, putative SRF-binding sites have been identified in the VE-cadherin-2/protocadherin12 [33], integrin-β1, integrin-β1 binding protein 2, protocadherin7 and protocadherin18 genes [10]. These observations suggest the involvement of SRF in regulation of cell-cell contacts; however as of yet, no experimental studies have addressed whether SRF is a significant player in these interactions, or whether SRF is a regulator of these genes in VEC.

Our results also raise the possibility that SRF may play a role in periendothelial cell/pericyte recruitment and vessel stabilization via involvement in angiopoietin (Ang) signalling. PECAM staining of yolk sac from Ang1-null mice shows a loss of vascular integrity similar to that seen in our study [34]. Ang1, a member of the angiopoietin family of ligands [25], activates the Tie2 receptor by binding to it and inducing its tyrosine phosphorylation. Ang1 is generated by non-endothelial cells, such as VSMC and other vascular pericytes recruited to vessels. Early in development between E9 to E11, Ang1 is found most prominently in the heart myocardium surrounding the endocardium. Later, it becomes more widely distributed, most often detected in the mesenchyme surrounding developing vessels and in close association with endothelial cells. Ang1-dependent vessel stabilization occurs by supporting reciprocal interactions between the vascular endothelium, pericytes, and surrounding extracellular matrix and mesenchyme [35]. Tie2 mediates Ang1 signalling via several known signalling pathways, including the Akt, RhoA/Rac1, MAPK, and ERK1/2 pathways [25]. Since SRF is a known mediator of all these pathways [3639], this suggests that a role for SRF in Tie-2 mediated angiogenic remodelling may also lie as a downstream effector in the Ang1/2 signalling cascade in endothelial cells.

The results presented here unequivocally establish SRF as a critical regulator of endothelial cell function in vivo and indicate that appropriate SRF protein expression is required for remodelling of vascular networks. However, these results do not directly address the role of SRF in endothelial specification and differentiation since the Tie2Cre construct is expressed in differentiated endothelial cells. Our results suggest that disruption of anchoring-type proteins may play a significant role in the observed vascular failure, although the precise underlying molecular mechanisms remain to be addressed. Development of reagents that allow functional analyses of SRF loss of in endothelial precursors as well as vessel maturation will be required to more fully address these questions.

Conclusion

Our study provides the first in vivo experimental evidence of a role for SRF in VEC function during embryonic development. Mouse embryos lacking SRF expression in endothelial cells die mid-gestation due to apparent vascular insufficiency. Initial analysis suggests a lethal malfunction in angiogenic remodelling and vessel maintenance. The extent to which this malfunction is due to failed reciprocal signalling between VEC and surrounding mesenchyme or perhaps incomplete vascular pericyte recruitment remains to be determined.

Methods

Mice and Genotyping

The Tie2Cre and Srff/ftransgenic mouse lines have been previously described [27, 40]. Previous work has demonstrated that expression of the Tie2Cre gene begins early at E7.5; expression has been noted in all endothelial and endocardial tissues as well as some hematopoietic tissues [27]. Embryos were generated by timed mating, designating embryonic day 0.5 (E0.5) as noon on the day a vaginal plug was observed. Genotyping was performed under standard protocols using genomic DNA isolated from embryonic yolk sac, amnionic membrane, or tail tissue. Primers used were: Tie2Cre fwd 5'-GTTCGCAAGAACCTGATGGACA-3' and rev 5'-CTAGAGCCTGTTTTGCACGTTC-3'; Srff/ffwd 5'-TGCTTACTGGAAAGCTCATGG-3' and rev 5'-TGCTGGTTTGGmCATCAACT-3'; HPRT fwd 5'-AGCGCAAGTTGAATCTGC-3' and rev 5'-AGCGACAATCTACCAGAG-3'. All procedures were in compliance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Medical College of Wisconsin.

Quantitation of embryonic total body and isolated heart weights

Embryos were harvested from timed pregnant females and placed individually on a clean glass slide for weight determination; excess buffer fluid was absorbed by wicking with tissues prior to weighing. After whole body weight was recorded, the heart was dissected out and weighed separately. Amnionic membrane was reserved for genotypic analysis.

Histology, Immunohistochemistry, and Microscopy

Embryos were harvested from timed pregnant females, photographed, and then fixed in either 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS or Tris-buffered zinc fixative (0.1 M Tris pH7.4 with 3.2 mM calcium acetate, 22.8 mM zinc acetate, and 36.7 mM zinc chloride). Yolk sac tissues selected for whole mount immunostaining were processed as described [41]. After staining, tissues were photographed and further processed for paraffin-embedding. All other samples were processed for paraffin-embedding, and subsequent sections (7 μm) were used for either hematoxylin & eosin staining, alcian blue staining, immunohistochemistry or confocal microscopy as described [42, 43]. Reagents utilized were: anti-E-cadherin (BD Bioscience, clone 36); anti-sarcomeric myosin (University of Iowa Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, clone MF-20); anti-PECAM-1 (BD Biosciences, clone MEC13.3); anti-phospho-Histone H3 (Millipore, Ser-10); anti-SRF (ProteinTech custom). Digital image capture was performed using a Nikon SM2100 microscope with a Nikon CoolPix995 camera (whole mount), Nikon Eclipse TE300 microscope with a SpotII digital camera (tissue sections), or a Leica TCS SP2 laser scanning confocal microscope imaging system (confocal imaging). For electron microscopy, embryos were harvested from timed pregnant females and fixed in glutaraldehyde/sodium arsenate buffer. Subsequent processing and image collection were performed by the Electron Microscopy Core Facility at the Medical College of Wisconsin.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Mark Majesky and Dr. Simon Conway for valuable discussions, Dr. Alexandra Lerch-Gaggl and the Bryant Imaging Core Facility at MCW for assistance with confocal imagery, and Mr. Clive Wells of the Electron Microscopy Core Facility at MCW for assistance and expertise in electron microscopy. This work was supported by grants HL67272 and HL084636 to R.P.M. from the National Institutes of Health; and a grant from Sophia Wolf Quadracci Memorial Fund for Stem Cell Research to R.P.M.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin

References

  1. Miano JM: Serum response factor: toggling between disparate programs of gene expression. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2003, 35: 577-593. 10.1016/S0022-2828(03)00110-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Treisman R: The serum response element. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 1992, 17: 423-426. 10.1016/0968-0004(92)90013-Y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arsenian S, Weinhold B, Oelgeschlager M, Ruther U, Nordheim A: Serum response factor is essential for mesoderm formation during mouse embryogenesis. EMBO Journal. 1998, 17: 6289-6299. 10.1093/emboj/17.21.6289.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Posern G, Treisman R: Actin' together: serum response factor, its cofactors and the link to signal transduction. Trends in Cell Biology. 2006, 16: 588-596. 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.09.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Belaguli NS, Schildmeyer LA, Schwartz RJ: Organization and myogenic restricted expressin of the murine serum response factor gene. A role for autoregulation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1997, 272: 18222-18231. 10.1074/jbc.272.29.18222.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boxer LM, Miwa T, Gustafson TA, Kedes L: Identification and characterization of a factor that binds to two human sarcomeric actin promoters. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1989, 264: 1284-1292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boxer LM, Prywes R, Roeder RG, Kedes L: The sarcomeric actin CArG-binding factor is indistinguishable from the c-fos serum response factor. Mol Cell Biol. 1989, 9 (2): 515-522.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Charvet C, Houbron C, Parlakian A, Giordani J, Lahoute C, Bertrand A, Sotiropoulos A, Renou L, Schmitt A, Melki J, Li Z, Daegelen D, Tuil D: New role for serum response factor in postnatal skeletal muscle growth and regeneration via the interleukin 4 and insulin-like growth factor 1 pathways. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2006, 26: 6664-6674. 10.1128/MCB.00138-06.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Li S, Czubryt MP, McAnally J, Bassel-Duby R, Richardson JA, Wiebel FF, Nordheim A, Olson EN: Requirement for serum response factor for skeletal muscle growth and maturation revealed by tissue-specific gene deletion in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2005, 102: 1082-1087. 10.1073/pnas.0409103102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Balza RO, Misra RP: Role of the serum response factor in regulating contractile apparatus gene expression and sarcomeric integrity in cardiomyocytes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006, 281: 6498-6510. 10.1074/jbc.M509487200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Miano JM, Ramanan N, Georger MA, de Mesy Bentley KL, Emerson RL, Balza RO, Xiao Q, Weiler H, Ginty DD, Misra RP: Restricted inactivation of serum response factor to the cardiovascular system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004, 101: 17132-17137. 10.1073/pnas.0406041101.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Parlakian A, Charvet C, Escoubet B, Mericskay M, Molkentin JD, Gary-BOBO G, Windt LJD, Ludosky MA, Paulin D, Daegelen D, Tuil D, Li Z: Temporally controlled onset of dilated cardiomyopathy through disruption of the SRF gene in adult heart. Circulation. 2005, 112: 2930-2939.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Parlakian A, Tuil D, Hamard G, Tavernier G, Hentzen D, Concordet JP, Paulin D, Li Z, Daegelen D: Targeted inactivation of serum response factor in the developing heart results in myocardial defects and embryonic lethality. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2004, 24 (12): 5281-5289. 10.1128/MCB.24.12.5281-5289.2004.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Du KL, Ip HS, Li J, Chen M, Dandre F, Yu W, Lu MM, Owens GK, Parmacek MS: Myocardin is a critical serum response factor cofactor in the transcriptional program regulating smooth muscle cell differentiation. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2003, 23: 2425-2437. 10.1128/MCB.23.7.2425-2437.2003.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rensen SS, Niessen PM, Long X, Doevendans PA, Miano JM, van Eys GJ: Contribution of serum response factor and myocardin to transcriptional regulation of smoothelins. Cardiovascular Research. 2006, 70: 136-145. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.12.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yoshida T, Sinha S, Dandre F, Wamhoff BR, Hoofnagle MH, Kremer BE, Wang DZ, Olson EN, Owens GK: Myocardin is a key regulator of CArG-dependent transcription of multiple smooth muscle marker genes. Circulation Research. 2003, 92: 856-864. 10.1161/01.RES.0000068405.49081.09.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mikawa T, Fischman DA: Retroviral analysis of cardiac morphogenesis: discontinuous formation of coronary vessels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1992, 89: 9504-9508. 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9504.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mikawa T, Gourdie RG: Pericardial mesoderm generates a population of coronary smooth muscle cells migrating into the heart along with ingrowth of the epicardial organ. Developmental Biology. 1996, 174: 221-232. 10.1006/dbio.1996.0068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Vrancken Peeters MP, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Mentink MM, Poelmann RE: Smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts of the coronary arteries derive from epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of the epicardium. Anatomy and Embryology. 1999, 199: 367-378. 10.1007/s004290050235.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Komiyama M, Ito K, Shimada Y: Origin and development of the epicardium in the mouse embryo. Anatomy and Embryology. 1987, 176: 183-189. 10.1007/BF00310051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson TJ, Duncan SA, Misra RP: Conserved enhancer in the serum response factor promoter controls expression during early coronary vasculogenesis. Circulation Research. 2004, 94: 1059-1066. 10.1161/01.RES.0000125296.14014.17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Landerholm TE, Dong XR, Lu J, Belaguli NS, Schwartz RJ, Majesky MW: A role for serum response factor in coronary smooth muscle differentiation from proepicardial cells. Development. 1999, 126: 2053-2062.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim S, Ip HS, Lu MM, Clendenin C, Parmacek MS: A serum response factor-dependent transcriptional regulatory program identifies distinct smooth muscle cell sublineages. Mol Cell Biol. 1997, 17 (4): 2266-2278.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chai J, Jones MK, Tarnawski AS: Serum response factor is a critical requirement for VEGF signaling in endothelial cells and VEGF-induced angiogenesis. FASEB Journal. 2004, 18: 1264-1266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Eklund L, Olsen BR: Tie receptors and their angiopoietin ligands are context-dependent regulators of vascular remodeling. Experimental cell research. 2006, 312: 630-641. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.09.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schlaeger TM, Bartunkova S, Lawitts JA, Teichmann G, Risau W, Deutsch U, Sato TN: Uniform vascular-endothelial-cell-specific gene expression in both embryonic and adult transgenic mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997, 94: 3058-3063. 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3058.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kisanuki YY, Hammer RE, Miyazaki J, Williams SC, Richardson JA, Yanagisawa M: Tie2-Cre transgenic mice: a new model for endothelial cell-lineage analysis in vivo. Developmental Biology. 2001, 230: 230-242. 10.1006/dbio.2000.0106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaufman MH, Bard JBL: The Anatomical Basis of Mouse Development. 1999, San Diego , Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith TK, Bader DM: Signals from both sides: Control of cardiac development by the endocardium and epicardium. Seminars in cell & developmental biology. 2007, 18: 84-89. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.12.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Misra RP, Rivera VM, Wang JM, Fan PD, Greenberg ME: The serum response factor is extensively modified by phosphorylation following its synthesis in serum-stimulated fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol. 1991, 11 (9): 4545-4554.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gerhardt H, Wolburg H, Redies C: N-cadherin mediates pericytic-endothelial interaction during brain angiogenesis in the chicken. Developmental Dynamics. 2000, 218: 472-479. 10.1002/1097-0177(200007)218:3<472::AID-DVDY1008>3.0.CO;2-#.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hewat EA, Durmort C, Jacquamet L, Concord E, Gulino-Debrac D: Architecture of the VE-cadherin hexamer. Journal of molecular biology. 2007, 365: 744-751. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sun Q, Chen G, Streb JW, Long X, Yang Y, Stoeckert CJ, Miano JM: Defining the mammalian CArGome. Genome research. 2006, 16: 197-207. 10.1101/gr.4108706.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Suri C, Jones PF, Patan S, Bartunkova S, Maisonpierre PC, Davis S, Sato TN, Yancopoulos GD: Requisite role of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, during embryonic angiogenesis. Cell. 1996, 87: 1171-1180. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81813-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shimoda H, Bernas MJ, Witte MH, Gale NW, Yancopoulos GD, Kato S: Abnormal recruitment of periendothelial cells to lymphatic capillaries in digestive organs of angiopoietin-2-deficient mice. Cell and tissue research. 2007, 328: 329-337. 10.1007/s00441-006-0360-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gille H, Kortenjann M, Thomae O, Moomaw C, Slaughter C, Cobb MH, Shaw PE: ERK phosphorylation potentiates Elk-1-mediated ternary complex formation and transactivation. EMBO Journal. 1995, 14: 951-962.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hill CS, Treisman R: Differential activation of c-fos promoter elements by serum, lysophosphatidic acid, G proteins and polypeptide growth factors. EMBO Journal. 1995, 14: 5037-5047.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Whitmarsh AJ, Shore P, Sharrocks AD, Davis RJ: Integration of MAP kinase signal transduction pathways at the serum response element. Science. 1995, 269: 403-407. 10.1126/science.7618106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Poser S, Impey S, Trinh K, Xia Z, Storm DR: SRF-dependent gene expression is required for PI3-kinase-regulated cell proliferation. EMBO Journal. 2000, 19: 4955-4966. 10.1093/emboj/19.18.4955.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramanan N, Shen Y, Sarsfield S, Lemberger T, Schutz G, Linden DJ, Ginty DD: SRF mediates activity-induced gene expression and synaptic plasticity but not neuronal viability. Nature neuroscience. 2005, 8: 759-767. 10.1038/nn1462.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu Y, Xiao R, Li Y: Effect of ethanol on the development of visceral yolk sac. Human reproduction (Oxford, England). 2005, 20: 2509-2516. 10.1093/humrep/dei075.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Battle MA, Konopka G, Parviz F, Gaggl AL, Yang C, Sladek FM, Duncan SA: Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha orchestrates expression of cell adhesion proteins during the epithelial transformation of the developing liver. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006, 103: 8419-8424. 10.1073/pnas.0600246103.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Parviz F, Matullo C, Garrison WD, Savatski L, Adamson JW, Ning G, Kaestner KH, Rossi JM, Zaret KS, Duncan SA: Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha controls the development of a hepatic epithelium and liver morphogenesis. Nature genetics. 2003, 34 (3): 292-296. 10.1038/ng1175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Holtz and Misra; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement