Hey2 functions in parallel with Hes1 and Hes5 for mammalian auditory sensory organ development
© Li et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 31 October 2007
Accepted: 26 February 2008
Published: 26 February 2008
Skip to main content
© Li et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 31 October 2007
Accepted: 26 February 2008
Published: 26 February 2008
During mouse development, the precursor cells that give rise to the auditory sensory organ, the organ of Corti, are specified prior to embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5). Subsequently, the sensory domain is patterned precisely into one row of inner and three rows of outer sensory hair cells interdigitated with supporting cells. Both the restriction of the sensory domain and the patterning of the sensory mosaic of the organ of Corti involve Notch-mediated lateral inhibition and cellular rearrangement characteristic of convergent extension. This study explores the expression and function of a putative Notch target gene.
We report that a putative Notch target gene, hairy-related basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcriptional factor Hey2, is expressed in the cochlear epithelium prior to terminal differentiation. Its expression is subsequently restricted to supporting cells, overlapping with the expression domains of two known Notch target genes, Hairy and enhancer of split homolog genes Hes1 and Hes5. In combination with the loss of Hes1 or Hes5, genetic inactivation of Hey2 leads to increased numbers of mis-patterned inner or outer hair cells, respectively. Surprisingly, the ectopic hair cells in Hey2 mutants are accompanied by ectopic supporting cells. Furthermore, Hey2-/-;Hes1-/- and Hey2-/-;Hes1+/- mutants show a complete penetrance of early embryonic lethality.
Our results indicate that Hey2 functions in parallel with Hes1 and Hes5 in patterning the organ of Corti, and interacts genetically with Hes1 for early embryonic development and survival. Our data implicates expansion of the progenitor pool and/or the boundaries of the developing sensory organ to account for patterning defects observed in Hey2 mutants.
The organ of Corti consists of four parallel rows of sensory hair cells along the longitudinal axis of the spiraled cochlea. The first row of hair cells from the center, or the medial side, of the cochlea are known as inner hair cells (IHCs). The remaining three rows of hair cells toward the periphery, or the lateral side, of the cochlea are known as outer hair cells (OHCs). Invariably, hair cells are separated from each other by several types of morphologically distinct non-sensory supporting cells. The mosaic cellular arrangement in the organ of Corti allows the tissue to sustain mechanic transduction and to maintain homeostasis required for the function and survival of the organ of Corti.
The precise cellular architect of the organ of Corti provides a unique system to examine mechanisms underlying cellular patterning. During development, the precursor cells that give rise to both the sensory hair cells and supporting cells of the organ of Corti exit the cell cycle around embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5) in mice [1, 2]. Subsequently, hair cell differentiation initiates near the base of the cochlea at the inner hair cell location and gradually reaches the ends of the cochlear duct along the longitudinal axis and toward the outer-most row of outer hair cells laterally [2–4]. The differentiation of hair cells requires a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein, atonal homolog 1 (Atoh1) or mouse atonal homolog 1 (Math1) . The differentiation of the supporting cells appears to follow that of hair cells . The molecular mechanism underlying the mosaic arrangement of hair cells and supporting cells has been shown to involve Notch signaling-mediated lateral inhibition [7–9]. During Notch signaling, the expression of a transcription activating bHLH gene, such as Math1, leads to the expression of Notch ligands at hair cell membranes [10, 11]. Notch ligands bind to the receptor Notch on neighboring cells to activate Notch [10, 11]. As a consequence of Notch activation, hairy and enhancer of split (Hes) homologs or hairy-related (Hey) bHLH transcriptional repressors  are expressed, which suppress the expression of the activating bHLH gene in these neighboring cells [10, 11, 13, 14, 10, 11, 13–15]. The neighboring cells therefore adopt a different cell fate. In zebrafish, mutations in Notch signaling transform inner ear sensory organs into epithelia consisting entirely of hair cells , supporting Notch-mediated lateral inhibition in patterning sensory mosaics of the inner ear. In mice, components of Notch signaling, such as Notch ligands Delta-like1 (Dll1) and Jagged2 (Jag2), Notch1, Hes1 and Hes5, are expressed in the organ of Corti during terminal differentiation of the organ of Corti [14, 15, 17–20]. Consistent with their expression in the cochlear epithelium, loss-of-function of these genes leads to mis-patterning of the hair cells and variously increased numbers of hair cells [7, 8, 14, 15, 19]. These data together indicates that Notch signaling regulates cellular patterning of inner ear sensory organs in mammals.
Patterning defects within Notch mutants vary greatly. In particular, Notch1 mutants and Dll1; Jag2 double mutants have greatly increased numbers of hair cells and drastically altered patterning of the organ of Corti [7, 8] while Hes1 and Hes5 mutants have much weaker patterning defects [14, 15], implicating compensatory pathways for Hes1 and Hes5 in the organ of Corti. To explore compensating genes for Hes1 and Hes5, we used differential gene expression profiling and candidate gene approaches and identified the expression of two additional Hairy-related genes, Hey1 and Hey2 [21–23], in the cochlea during terminal differentiation of the organ of Corti. We further analyzed the function of Hey2 in the development of the organ of Corti.
Following the establishment of the post-mitotic primordial organ of Corti, the differentiation of hair cells and supporting cells is initiated near the base of the cochlea at the inner hair cell region [2, 27]. By E16.5, the organ of Corti in the basal to medial regions of the cochlea has been patterned into a sensory mosaic consisting of one row of inner and three rows of outer hair cells interdigitated with supporting cells (Fig. 2). From a cross section of the cochlear duct, hair cells are seen at the lumenal layer while the nuclei of supporting cells are localized to the basal layer of the cochlear epithelium (Fig. 2A–D and the diagrams in 2E), and the cytoplasmic phalangeal processes of supporting cells project into the lumenal hair cell layer to separate hair cells from each other. We compared the expression of a basic helix-loop-helix gene, Hes6, in the cochlea at E16.5 to several other molecular markers. As we have previously shown , Hes6 is restricted to the hair cells at the lumenal layer at this stage (Fig. 2A). In contrast, Hes5 message RNA is limited to the supporting cell nuclei (Fig. 2B) . Similarly, the expression of Hey2 (Fig. 2C) and Hey1 (Fig. 2D) is also seen in the supporting cells. By E17.5, the expression of Hey2 has been down-regulated starting from the base of the cochlea to the apex, while the expression of Hey1 still remains in the supporting cells (data not shown, diagramed in Fig. 2E).
The early onset of Hey2 in the developing inner ear at E11.5 and the broad expression of Hey2 in the cochlea at E14.5 suggest that its initial expression might precede hair cell and supporting cell differentiation in the cochlea. To test this possibility, we examined the expression of Hey2 in Math1-/- animals , and compared its expression with that of Hes6 and Isl1 (Fig. 1D, F). In the absence of Math1, the primordial organ of Corti marked by the expressed of p27/Kip1 is established . However, hair cells fail to differentiate and cells within the primordial organ of Corti die . Hes6 marks the sensory lineage in the developing inner ear and its expression in cochlear hair cells depends on Math1 . In Math1-/- cochleae, Hes6 was not expressed (Fig. 1K). Isl1 is expressed early in the otocyst and its expression in the organ of Corti is independent of Math1 (Fig. 1L) . Similar to Isl1, Hey2 was expressed in the otocyst and its expression was maintained in the cochlear epithelium in Math1-/- animals at E14.5 (Fig. 1M).
In summary, Hey 2 is expressed in the otocyst prior to the formation of the cochlear duct; its onset in the cochlea is independent of Math1; and its expression in the cochlea is dynamic, partially overlapping with Hes1 and Hes5 in the developing cochlea (Fig. 2E). An additional Hey gene, Hey1, is also expressed in an overlapping pattern with Hey2.
Hey2 belongs to the same bHLH gene sub-family as Hes5, which can function as downstream targets for Notch signaling . The similarity in patterning defect observed in Hey2-/- and Hes5-/- animals suggests that Hey2 may play a similar role as Hes5 in the organ of Corti. The partially overlapping expression of Hey2 and Hes5 (Fig. 2B, C) during terminal differentiation of the organ of Corti and the weak patterning defect in Hey2-/- or Hes5-/- animals further suggested that Hey2 may function redundantly with Hes5 for patterning the organ of Corti. To test this possibility, we crossed animals carrying mutant alleles for both Hey2 and Hes5, and compared Hey2-/- (Fig. 3D–F), Hes5-/- (Fig. 3G–I), and Hey2-/-; Hes5-/- (Fig. 3J–L) littermates, and quantified the number of mis-patterned outer hair cells in these animals (Fig. 4). We found a statistically significant increase in the numbers of mis-patterned outer hair cells in Hey2-/-; Hes5-/- animals (mis-patterned OHCs = 101.3 ± 29.1, n = 3) in comparison to Hey2-/- (p = 0.028) or Hes5-/- (p = 0.039) animals (Fig. 4). The effect of genetic inactivation of Hey2 and Hes5 on the patterning of outer hair cells appeared to be additive (Fig. 4).
In addition to the presence of segments of additional row of outer hair cells, we also observed variable amounts of inner hair cell doublets in Hey2-/- animals (Fig. 3D–F), in contrast to a single row of inner hair cells in control animals (Fig. 3A–C). However, statistic analyses showed that there is no significant increase in the number of inner hair cell doublets in Hey2-/- animals (IHC doublets = 4 ± 3, n = 3) in comparison to wild-type (IHC doublets = 3 ± 2, n = 3) control littermates (Fig. 4, p = 0.768). Since Hey2 shows a partial overlapping expression with a homologous gene, Hes1, at the onset of terminal differentiation of the organ of Corti (Fig. 1I, J) and the loss of Hes1 results in an increase in inner hair cell doublets and, to a lesser degree, an additional row of outer hair cells (Fig. 3M–O) [14, 15], we sought to determine whether Hey2 plays a redundant role to Hes1 in development of the organ of Corti.
As reported previously, Hes1-/- animals show progressively increased lethality after E12.5 . We found that Hes1-/-; Hey2-/- animals have a complete penetrance in early embryonic lethality. All of the Hes1-/-; Hey2-/- animals died before E13.5, prior to the terminal differentiation of the organ of Corti. In addition, in littermate crosses between Hes1+/-; Hey2+/- double heterozygotes and Hey2+/- single heterozygotes or within Hes1+/-; Hey2+/-double heterozygotes, eight Hes1+/-; Hey2-/- embryos were expected, none of which were recovered after E13.5, indicating a strong genetic interaction between Hey2 and Hes1 for early development and survival of mouse embryos.
We were able to recover Hes1-/- and Hes1-/-; Hey2+/- embryos and analyzed organs of Corti isolated from these animals (Figs. 3, 4). In comparison to Hes1-/- animals that showed frequent inner hair cell doublets (Figs. 3M–O, 4, IHC doublets = 56.7 ± 1.5, n = 3), the loss of a single copy of Hey2 in the Hes1-/- background (Figs. 3P–R, 4, IHC doublets = 108.3 ± 15.2, n = 3) led to a 2 fold-increase in the number of inner hair cell doublets (Fig. 4, p = 0.0003). Since Hey2+/- had no more inner hair cell doublets than control samples (Fig. 4, IHC doublets = 1.6 ± 1.4, n = 3), the increase in inner hair cell doublets in Hes1-/-; Hey2+/- animals appeared to be synergistic rather than additive. These data together indicate that Hey2 genetically interacts with Hes1 for early development of mouse embryos and for patterning inner hair cells in the organ of Corti.
The mis-patterning of hair cells in Hes1 and Hes5 mutants was observed previously [14, 15]. It was thought that the conversion of supporting cells to hair cells might account for the abnormality observed in Hes1 and Hes5 mutants, as predicted from a simple lateral inhibition model [14, 15]. However, the underlying molecular mechanism has not been tested. We observed enhanced phenotypes in Hes1 and Hey2 and in Hes5 and Hey2 compound mutants (Figs, 3 and 4), and explored the molecular roles of Hes family genes in patterning the organ of Corti.
Since inner hair cell doublets were observed in Hes1-/-;Hey2+/- animals, we also attempted to examine the arrangement of inner hair cells and its surrounding supporting cells in the mutant and wild-type cochleae (Fig. 5I–N). An antibody against p27/Kip1 marks all the supporting cells at this stage (Fig. 5J). However, the supporting cells surrounding inner hair cells labeled by p27/Kip1 at E18.5, the latest surviving stage for Hes1 and Hey2 compound mutants, showed variable arrangements in control cochleae (Fig. 5I, K). We could not determine whether the number of supporting cells surrounding inner hair cells changes accordingly in Hes1 and Hey2 compound mutants (Fig. 5L–N). Nevertheless, it is apparent that the ectopic inner hair cells in Hes1-/-;Hey2+/- animals do not contact other inner hair cells and are interdigitated by non-hair cells as shown in whole mount preparations of the mutant organ of Corti (Fig. 3P–R), implying a preserved mosaic arrangement of inner hair cells and supporting cells in Hes1-/-;Hey2+/- animals.
BrdU was injected into timed-pregnant mice at E14.5, and embryos were collected the same day after three consecutive injections (Fig. 6A–D). In control mice, the organ of Corti was post-mitotic as demonstrated by the lack of BrdU incorporation in the region at E14.5 (Fig. 6A, B). No proliferating cells were detected in the primordial organ of Corti in Hes1-/-;Hey2+/- embryos at E14.5 (Fig. 6C, D). Furthermore, to facilitate the identification of proliferating cells in the organ of Corti after E14.5, embryos injected with BrdU at E14.5 for three times were not collected until E18.5, allowing a longer chasing period for the incorporation of BrdU (Fig. 6E–J). Hair cells generated after E14.5 would be readily detected in embryos harvested at E18.5. The control E18.5 embryos had no BrdU+ cells in the organ of Corti (Fig. 6E–G). In Hes1-/-;Hey2+/- E18.5 embryos, no BrdU+ cells were detected (Fig. 6H–J). Similar results were obtained with Hes5 and Hey2 compound mutants (data not shown), indicating that no detectable extension of cell proliferation contributes to the ectopic hair cells and supporting cells in Hes1-/-;Hey2+/- (Fig. 6) or Hes5-/-;Hey2-/- (data not shown) mutants. Since Hes1-/-;Hes5-/- or Hes1-/-;Hey2-/- embryos die early in development, we could not examine perturbation of cell division in these mutants.
Hes1 and Hes5 play essential roles in patterning inner and outer hair cells, respectively [14, 15]. In addition, they appear to interact mutually for the patterning of both inner and outer hair cells in the development of the organ of Corti . In this study, we show that the expression of Hey2 overlaps with that of Hes1 and Hes5 (Figs. 1 and 2) and that the patterning defects in the organ of Corti in Hes1 or Hes5 mutants were increased in Hes1 and Hey2 (Figs. 3 and 4), and Hes5 and Hey2 (Figs. 3 and 4) compound mutants. These data together suggested that all three genes interact genetically to regulate patterning of the organ of Corti.
Theoretically, the production of ectopic hair cells may be resulted from conversion of supporting cells to hair cells, prolonged cell proliferation, expansion of the boundaries of the developing postmitotic sensory organ, and/or an increased pool of progenitor cells. Previous studies indicate that prolonged cell proliferation occurs in Notch or Notch ligand mutants after E14.5 , in addition to possible conversion of some supporting cells to hair cells in these mutants . It is not known whether an increased pool of progenitor cells, or expansion of the boundaries of the postmitotic sensory primordium may also contribute to the hyperplasia of the organ of Corti in these Notch or Notch ligand mutants. The expression of Hey2 in supporting cells during terminal differentiation (Fig. 2) is consistent with a role for mediating lateral inhibition, or repressing the cells surrounding hair cells to take on the same hair cell fate. Such a role would predict a loss of supporting cells to account for the ectopic hair cells in Hey2 mutants. Surprisingly, we not only did not see a decrease in supporting cells but also observed ectopic supporting cells associated with ectopic hair cells in Hes1 and Hey2 and in Hes5 and Hey2 compound mutants (Fig. 5). In addition, we did not detect any perturbation of cell division in Hes1 and Hey2 and in Hes5 and Hey2 compound mutants after E14.5 (Fig. 6 and data not shown).
These observations imply that an increased pool of progenitor cells prior to terminal mitosis and/or expansion of the boundaries of the postmitotic sensory primordium may account for the hyperplasia observed in Hes1;Hey2 and Hes5;Hey2 compound mutants. Consistent with either hypothesized roles, Hey2 also shows an early expression in the developing otocyst prior to the formation of the cochlea (Fig. 1B) and in the cochlea prior to the terminal differentiation of the organ of Corti (Figs. 1D, I), in addition to its expression in the supporting cells in the differentiating organ of Corti (Fig. 2C). At E11.5, the expression of Hey2 in the otocyst is excluded from the expression domain of Isl1 (Fig. 1A, B), which marks the neuronal and sensory lineages of the inner ear . At E14.5 when hair cell differentiation has just begun in the inner hair cell region at the base of the cochlear duct, Hey2 is restricted to a domain that may be slightly medial to the primordial organ of Corti (Figs. 1D, I), and this expression of Hey2 in the cochlea is independent of Math1 (Fig. 1M). It is possible that, consistent with the dual role of Notch signaling in neurogenesis, Hey2 has a role in redundantly restricting the pools for neuroprogenitors or the regions for the sensori-neural lineages of the inner ear, and/or the boundaries of the sensory primordium. The small but quantitatively significant defect made it impossible to detect whether there is an enlarged progenitor pool, through extra cell divisions or expansion of the lineage boundaries prior to terminal mitosis, and/or whether the boundaries of the developing organ of Corti during terminal differentiation are expanded.
In comparison to recovered Hes1; Hey2, Hes5;Hey2 (Figs. 3, 4), or Hes1;Hes5 compound mutants , Notch or Notch ligand mutations cause a similar but much stronger patterning defect [7, 8]. Early embryonic lethality associated with Hes1;Hes5 and Hes1;Hey2 compound mutants prevented us to recover double mutants carrying homozygous mutant alleles for Hes1 and Hes5, Hes1 and Hey2, or triple mutants. Hence, we were unable to conclusively ascertain whether Hes1, Hes5 and Hey2 are the key players mediating Notch signaling in the organ of Corti and whether additional players are involved. Indeed, an additional Hairy-related gene, Hey1, is also expressed in the organ of Corti during terminal differentiation (Fig. 1). It remains to be tested whether inactivation of other combinations or all of the Hes and Hey genes expressed in the developing cochlea by conditional inactivation will replicate the morphologic and molecular defects in Notch or Notch ligand mutants.
Cellular patterning defects also occur in planar cell polarity (PCP) mutants . Cellular rearrangements characteristic of convergent extension occur during terminal differentiation of the organ of Corti and lead to extension of the cochlear duct [27, 40, 41]. In PCP signaling mutants, the process of convergent extension is inhibited. The cochlear extension and the organ of Corti patterning defects in PCP mutants are accompanied by misorientation of stereociliary bundles of hair cells [40, 42]. The patterning defects in Hes1-/-;Hey2+/- or Hes5-/-;Hey2-/- mutants are distinctly different from that of PCP mutants. The extra row of outer hair cells or inner hair cell doublets in Hes5-/-;Hey2-/- or Hes1-/-;Hey2+/- mutants, respectively, were seen distributed along the entire length of the cochlear duct (Figs. 3, 4). No misorientation of stereociliary bundles and no shortening of the cochlear duct were observed in Hes1-/-;Hey2+/- or Hes5-/-;Hey2-/- mutants (data not shown). However, these cochlear duct defects have been observed in Notch and Notch ligand mutants that show significantly increased hair cell numbers in the unit length of the cochlear duct [7–9]. It is not clear whether inactivation of all the family members of Hey and Hes genes will replicate also the PCP-like cochlear duct defects of Notch mutants and whether the mis-patterning of hair cells in Notch and Notch ligand mutants is directly resulted from compromised convergent extension of the cochlear duct or a manifestation of altered cell fate determination and cell proliferation when Notch signaling is affected.
While members of the putative Notch target genes interact genetically in patterning the organ of Corti, their expressions show dynamically distinct, albeit overlapping, patterns in the developing cochlea. Accordingly, Hey2 and Hes5 appear to play a more important role in outer hair cells than in the inner hair cells while Hey2 and Hes1 act synergistically for correct patterning of the inner hair cells. These observations indicate a complex network of Notch target genes with temporal and spatially distinct and overlapping roles regulating the patterning of the organ of Corti and, possibly, cell lineage determination in the otocyst.
In this study, we show that the expression of Hey2 overlaps with that of two Notch target genes, Hes1 and Hes5 (Figs. 1 and 2), and that the patterning defects in the organ of Corti in Hes1 or Hes5 mutants were increased in Hes1;Hey2, and Hes5; Hey2 compound mutants (Figs. 3 and 4). These data together suggested that Hey2 interacts genetically with Hes1 and Hes5 to regulate patterning of the organ of Corti. In addition, early embryonic lethality is observed in Hey2-/-;Hes1-/- and Hey2-/-;Hes1+/- mice, indicating that Hey2 interacts with Hes1 for early embryonic development and survival. We also explored the underlying molecular role for Hey2 and its family members, Hes1 and Hes5. We found that neither conversion of supporting cells (Fig. 5) to hair cells nor prolonged cell division (Fig. 6) can be detected to account for the hyperplasia of the organ of Corti in Hey2 compound mutants. It is possible that an increase in the progenitor pool, by accelerated cell proliferation and expansion of the boundaries of the sensory domain prior to terminal mitosis, and/or the expansion of the boundaries of the developing sensory organ during terminal differentiation, may result in production of ectopic hair cells associated with ectopic supporting cells.
The animals used are Hes1+/- (a gift from R. Kageyama) , Hes5+/- (a gift from R. Kageyama) , Hey2+/- , Math1/GFP , and Math1+/-  mice. Hes1, Hey2 or Hes5, Hey2 compound mutant embryos were obtained from intercrosses of Hes1+/-; Hey2+/- or Hes5+/-; Hey2+/- doubly heterozygous mice. Hey2+/- colonies were maintained in C57/B6 background. Hes1+/- and Hes5+/- mice in the CD1 background were backcrossed with C57/B6 mice for more than 8 generations for this study. The Hes1 and Hey2, and the Hes5 and Hey2 breeds are of a homogenous black coat color. Math1-/- animals were generated by crossing Math1+/- animals. Genotyping were carried out by PCR with tail DNA using the following oligonucleotides: Hes1, 5'-TGG GAT GEG GGA CAT GCG GG-3', 5'-TCA CCT CGT TCA TGA CTC G-3'; 5'-GCA GCG CAT CGC CTT CTA TC-3'; Hes5, 5'-GCT GGG GGC CGC TGG AAG TGG-3', 5'-CCG CTC CGC TCC GCT CGC TAA-3', 5'-GCA GCG CAT CGC CTT CTA TC-3'; and Hey2, 5'-CAC TAA GAA CTA GCG ATC TGG-3', 5' CTC AGG GGA TTT TGA AAG C-3', 5'GCA CGA GAC TAG TGA GAC GTG.
Animal care and use was in accordance with NIH guidelines and was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Emory University and the University of California, Irvine. The morning after the mating of the animals is designated as embryonic day 0.5 (E0.5). The number of animals used for each genotype at each stage is least three and indicated where data are presented.
BrdU (Sigma) was dissolved at 5 mg/ml in 1× PBS and injected at 50 μg per gram of body weight. Mice were injected intraperitioneally three times at 2 hour intervals starting at E14.5 and sacrificed at the stages specified in the text.
Inner ears were dissected from E11.5, E14.5, and E16.5 embryos and immediately fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 1 hour. Fixed inner ears were cryoprotected in 20% sucrose in PBS and embedded in OCT for cryostat sectioning. Sections (12–16 μm) were dried at room temperature for 1 hour and processed for in situ hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled probes . Briefly, the inner ear sections were post-fixed in ice-cold 4% PFA for 10 minutes, treated with protease K (20 μg/ml) for 2–3 minutes, rinsed with DEPC-treated PBS, acetylated in 0.1 M TEA (Triethanolamine) freshly-made by adding 125 μl of acetic anhydride to 50 ml 0.1 M TEA, pH7.5, re-fixed in 4% PFA, and dehydrated by a series of EtOH (70%, 95%). The sections were then incubated with a hybridization solution (50% deionized Formamide, 10% Dextran Sulfate, 1× Denhardt's, 0.25 mg yeast tRNA, 0.3 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH8.0, 5 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaPO4, pH7.2, 1% Sarcosyl) for 1 hour at 55° before incubated with the hybridization solution containing a probe (20 μg/ml) overnight at 55° in a sealed humidifier chamber. After the hybridization, slides were washed in pre-warmed washing solution (50% Formamide, 2×SSC) at 65° for three times, washed once with PBT (PBS, 0.1% Tween-20) at room temperature, blocked with 10% sheep serum in PBT for 1 hour at room temperature, incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibody in PBT, 1% sheep serum at 4° overnight. Following antibody incubation, slides were washed in NTMT (0.1 M NaCl, 0.1 M Tris-HCL, pH9.5, 0.05 M MgCl2, 0.1% Tween-20 containing Levamisole (0.5 mg/ml) for four times, and incubated with BM-purple AP substrate in NTMT without Levamisole for up to one week. Slides were washed in PBS and when appropriate color developed. Probes for Hes1, Hes5, Hey1, Hey2, Oto90, Hes6, and Isl1 were prepared using cDNAs cloned from the cochlea.
Immunostaining of cochlear sections were performed as described previously . Primary antibodies used for this study are: anti-BrdU (Chemicon, mouse monoclonal, 1:100); anti-p27/Kip1 (BD Transduction Laboratories, mouse monoclonal, 1:200) anti-Myosin6 (Proteus BioSciences, rabbit polyclonal, 1:200); anti-Prox1 (Chemicon, rabbit polyclonal, 1:1000). Secondary antibodies are: FITC-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit (Jackson Lab, 1:1000); Rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-goat (Jackson Lab, 1: 1000); Cy5-conjugated donkey anti-mouse (Jackson Lab, 1:1000). For p27/Kip1 and BrdU staining, sections were steamed in 10 mM NaCitrate for 15 minutes prior to being subjected to the staining procedure. For Prox1 staining, the samples were treated with 1% SDS followed by blocking and antibody incubations as described previously . For hair cell staining of whole mount preparations of the cochlea, cochleae ducts were opened to expose the developing sensory epithelia prior to the staining procedure .
Digital images were captured on an LSM 510 (Carl Zeiss, Germany) confocal laser scanning microscope and an inverted fluorescent microscope (Olympus, Japan). Images for entire cochlear ducts were composed using Photoshop (Adobe System, USA). The number of inner or outer hair cells in each composed cochlea was counted by scoring Myosin6+ cells. The most distal tip of the apex region of the cochlea (10% of the length) was excluded from quantification since patterning of hair cells is incomplete in this region, and care was taken to use similarly 90% of the cochlear duct for each sample. Mis-patterned outer hair cells appearing as segments of an additional row of cells and inner hair cell doublets were counted. The number of mis-patterned inner and outer hair cells was directly plotted or the numbers of mis-patterned hair cells were calculated against normally patterned hair cells and plotted. Data collected from each experimental group with 3 samples from different animals are expressed as mean ± s.e.m. Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis.
inner hair cell
outer hair cell
embryonic day 0.5
We thank members of the Chen lab for critical discussions and technical support during the course of this project, and Drs. Chonnettia Jones and Padmashree Rida for comments on the manuscript. We thank Dr. Huda Zoghbi for Math1 mutant animals, and Dr. R. Kageyama for Hes1 and Hes5 mutant mice. This work is supported by grants from the National Institute of Health to P.C. (RO1 DC005213) and the Woodruff Foundation to P.C.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.