Mechanism of G1 arrest in the Drosophilaeye imaginal disc
© Escudero and Freeman; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 13 September 2006
Accepted: 02 March 2007
Published: 02 March 2007
Most differentiating cells are arrested in G1-phase of the cell cycle and this proliferative quiescence appears important to allow differentiation programmes to be executed. An example occurs in the Drosophila eye imaginal disc, where all cells are synchronized and arrested in G1 phase prior to making a fate choice either to initiate the first round of photoreceptor differentiation or to re-enter one terminal mitosis.
We have analysed the mechanism of this temporally regulated G1-phase in order to develop an integrated model of this proliferative regulation. We find that an overlapping set of cell cycle inhibitors combine to form an efficient barrier to cell cycle progression. This barrier depends on both the primary secreted signals that drive retinal development, Dpp and Hh. Each of these has distinct, as well as partially overlapping functions, in ensuring that Cyclin E and dE2F1 are kept in check. Additionally, inhibition of Cyclin A by Roughex is essential, and this regulation is independent of Dpp and Hh.
One implication of these results is to further support the idea that Cyclin A has important functions in S-phase entry as well as in mitosis. The unexpectedly complex network of regulation may reflect the importance of cells being uniformly ready to respond to the inductive signals that coordinate retinal differentiation.
All eukaryotes use the same fundamental machinery to drive cell cycle progression but multicellular organisms face the additional challenge of regulating the time and place of proliferation throughout development. A well conserved aspect of this developmental regulation is that cells normally arrest in G1-phase of the cell cycle prior to differentiation. This provides a quiescent stage for differentiation to begin and, once cells start to adopt their terminal fate, most will never re-enter a proliferative state. In tumorigenesis, however, re-entry of arrested cells into abnormal proliferation can occur .
The Drosophila eye provides an experimentally amenable example of developmentally regulated proliferation and has therefore been extensively studied as a model. Differentiation of the individual facets (ommatidia) of the compound eye occurs in a moving wave from the posterior to the anterior of the eye imaginal disc, implying that there is a gradient of increasing cell maturity from anterior to posterior in the disc. The front of the wave of development is marked by an indentation known as the morphogenetic furrow (MF) . Several hours prior to the passage of the MF (and therefore anterior to it) all cells in the eye disc arrest in G1-phase [3, 4]. After the MF passes, those cells that have not yet started to differentiate as photoreceptors re-enter S-phase for one terminal round of division, the "second mitotic wave" .
Here we focus on the mechanisms responsible for establishing and maintaining G1-arrest of cells prior to the MF (in what we call non-proliferative region, NPR). Specifically, we aim to understand how cells become synchronous and arrest in G1-phase and to learn how the signals that drive the wave of eye development direct this process. This aspect of developmental control of proliferation in Drosophila is not well understood, although it has been investigated in a number of different contexts including the eye, the wing and the embryo [4, 6–12]. Most significantly in the eye, Decapentaplegic (Dpp, the Drosophila homologue of BMP ligands) signalling is required to maintain G1 arrest in the anterior region of the arrested zone. Dpp appears to repress Cyclin E, since the removal of several CycE inhibitors [7, 13, 14] causes a similar phenotype to the lack to the Dpp receptor, thick veins (tkv) or to the overexpression of a CycE transgene . More recently, Firth and Baker have concluded that Dpp and Hedgehog (Hh) act redundantly, and between them are sufficient to arrest cells in G1 . This involvement of Dpp and Hh is consistent with their roles as the primary secreted signals that drive MF progression. Finally, the overexpression of Cyclin A or the absence of the cyclin kinase inhibitor Roughex (Rux) can also induce S-phase entry in the NPR [4, 15]. Together, these earlier studies have identified a number of different mechanisms of control of G1 arrest but it is notable that no common checkpoint has been identified and no unified view of the process has yet been proposed.
Providing an explanation for this lack of a clear model, our results indicate that in the eye disc no single component is fully responsible for the developmental cell cycle arrest prior to the morphogenetic furrow. We show that first, Hh and Dpp together promote entry into mitosis of the cells prior to G1 arrest, thereby driving cells into G1-phase and initiating the NPR. Then, an overlapping set of cell cycle inhibitors combine to form an efficient and robust barrier to cell cycle progression. This barrier depends partially on the inhibition of Cyclin E and dE2F1 activity, also under the control of Dpp and Hh. However, in contrast to previous work , our results show that the role of Hh and Dpp in maintaining G1 arrest, is largely confined to the anterior part of the NPR. The inhibition of Cyclin A by Rux becomes the major barrier to S-phase entry in the posterior region and, significantly, this is independent of both Dpp and Hh. This analysis of the relative importance of the different players involved in G1 arrest allows us to integrate them into an overall model of signal-regulated synchronisation and proliferative arrest.
Defining the region of G1 arrest in the eye imaginal disc
Between the proliferating cells in the anterior of the eye imaginal disc and the SMW is a broad band of cells that are arrested in G1-phase [3, 16]; they span about 11–14 rows of cells. Given the accepted view that the morphogenetic furrow moves forward, on average, by one row of ommatidia (3–4 cell rows) every 70 min , we estimate that on average cells remain in this G1 arrest for five to six hours. Interestingly, this is only slightly longer than the estimate of the normal G1 phase of cells in the proliferating region of the disc. This is based on the observation that the doubling time for cells in the eye disc is approximately 12 hours , and that the proportion of cells in G1 phase in proliferating disc cells is one third . These estimates imply that the formation of this non-proliferative region (NPR) depends significantly on cell cycle synchronization as they approach the MF, as well as on specific arrest mechanisms.
To characterise the anatomy of the NPR further, we have used 3-dimensional reconstruction software to image the disc (Fig. 1D, E). This clearly showed that the morphogenetic furrow forms the posterior region of the NPR. It also allowed a clear view of the 'peripodial membrane', the layer of squamous cells that overlie the disc-proper and which can influence aspects of disc development . BrdU positive cells are present in the peripodial membrane, but these were randomly distributed, indicating the absence of coordination of G1 arrest between the two adjacent epithelia. To prevent the BrdU positive cells in the peripodial membrane being misinterpreted as disc proper cells, in all subsequent confocal projections we used Ato expression as a reference for disc proper.
The NPR requires repression of Cyclin E, dE2F1 and Cyclin A
Overexpression of UAS-dE2F1 (combined with its obligate partner UAS-Dp)  caused a weaker phenotype than Cyclin E, although the pattern was similar: in this case, occasional BrdU positive cells were seen but only in the anterior region of the NPR (Fig. 2C). This result is consistent with the loss of function phenotype of rbf, the main inhibitor dE2F1 activity, which causes ectopic S-phase cells only in the most anterior regions of the NPR . Taken together, the overexpression of Cyclin E and dE2F1/Dp in the NPR implies that at least one additional mechanism must promote G1 arrest in the posterior cells of the NPR; unlike the anterior cells, they are refractory to overexpression of Cyclin E or dE2F1/Dp. Note that because of the progressive development of the retina, the anterior cells mature into the posterior cells, so this different responsiveness to Cyclin E and dE2F1/Dp actually represents a developmental difference rather than a spatial one.
The co-overexpression of UAS-cycE and UAS-dE2F1/Dp produced a slightly stronger phenotype than UAS-cycE overexpression alone (in which endogenous dE2F1 is also activated): S-phase is efficiently activated in the anterior but less so in the posterior part of the NPR (Fig. 2D). This result is consistent with the earlier report that in clones mutant for both rbf and dap, inhibitors of dE2F1 and Cyclin E, respectively, the cells in the whole of the NPR do not arrest ; in our hands these double mutant rbf dap clones can only sometimes induce ectopic BrdU staining in the anterior region of the NPR and have even weaker effects in the posterior region (not shown). We take the difference between the more powerful effect of ectopic Cyclin E and dE2F1, and the weaker effect of rbf dap to indicate that overexpression of activators is a more powerful trigger than removal of natural repressors.
Cyclin A has a less well defined role in S-phase activation but the evidence for its participation is nevertheless strong [7, 15, 27]. Interestingly, its overexpression in the NPR gave a different result to Cyclin E or dE2F1. UAS-cycA induced ectopic BrdU staining in the whole width of the NPR, but was most efficient in the most posterior domain, where Cyclin E and dE2F1 are less effective (Fig. 2E and ). The combination of both transgenes, UAS-cycA and UAS-cycE strongly induced ectopic S-phase entry in cells throughout the NPR: almost all overexpressing cells failed to arrest in G1 (Fig. 2F).
Overall, our data provide strong evidence that G1 arrest in the NPR is controlled by multiple mechanisms with distinct regional effects. Specifically, in the anterior region of the NPR, which corresponds to the early stages of G1 arrest, the repression of Cyclin E and dE2F1 activity is critically important, while in the posterior half, where the cells are more mature, the repression of Cyclin A becomes necessary for the maintenance of these cells in the G1 phase.
Control of G1 arrest by Hh and Dpp
The NPR is the earliest visible change in cells as they enter the wave of development that will eventually produce the adult retina. Ultimately, the whole wave of eye development is propagated by secreted Dpp and Hh signals. Consistent with this, it has previously been reported that Dpp is responsible for the G1-arrest in the anterior part of the NPR [8, 11]; most recently, Firth and Baker have reported that Dpp and Hh act redundantly to induce the whole NPR . To understand the mechanism in detail by which Dpp and Hh cause cells to exit from proliferation and arrest/synchronise in G1, we genetically blocked the two pathways, either alone or together. We used mutations in Thick Veins (Tkv), the Dpp receptor; Smoothened (Smo), the membrane associated transducer of Hh signalling; Mad, an essential intracellular transducer of Dpp signalling; and Ci, a nuclear effector of Hh signalling. Note that Ci has constitutive repressor activity as well as being a Hh-dependent activator , implying that loss of Ci is not always equivalent to loss of Smo. For this reason, simultaneous loss of Smo and Tkv represents the best way of analysing the loss-of-function phenotypes of the Hh and Dpp pathways in the eye disc [32, 33].
Initial synchronisation of cells as they enter the NPR
A differential requirement for Dpp and Hh signalling in the posterior and anterior of the NPR
Loss of smo alone causes a slight delay in entry to the NPR, by one or two rows of cells, but no ectopic BrdU staining occurs in the rest of the region . We examined clones of tkv as well as double mutant clones for Mad ci, or tkv ci, or smo tkv (Fig. 3C–H). All four mutant conditions caused ectopic BrdU incorporation and Cyclin B expression in the anterior region of the NPR but none caused significant ectopic S-phase induction in the posterior region (this is especially clear in the case of Cyclin B staining (Fig. 3F, 3H). Of these four conditions, smo tkv was the only one in which occasional BrdU positive cells were detected in the posterior region (6 out of 32 clones; no more than 2–3 positive cells in any clone). Three points emerge from these data. First, they imply a clear difference between the maintenance of G1 in the anterior and posterior of the NPR. Second, Firth and Baker reported ectopic BrdU incorporation and Cyclin B accumulation in Mad ci clones in the whole NPR, not just the anterior region. We used the same alleles as they did but did not observe any posterior BrdU staining. Third, there is no evidence for a requirement for Ci in this process: tkv ci clones are indistinguishable from clones of tkv alone.
Redundancy of Smo and Tkv in the regulation of dE2F1 activity
A non-redundant requirement for Hh signalling in the expression of Dacapo
Loss of smo alone abolished the expression of Dacapo (Dap), an inhibitor of CycE activity [34, 35]. Careful examination showed that Dap expression begins in the posterior domain of the NPR and remains detectable through to the posterior of the SMW (Fig. 4C, 4D). We observed that Dap expression disappears in the smo3 clones, but not in the tkva12 clones or ci94 clones (Fig. 4C, 4D and not shown). This implies that Dap expression is not dependent on Dpp signalling. The result with ci clones implies that, consistent with earlier reports [36, 37], there is no positive role for Ci in Hh signalling in this context. We also observed Dap down regulation when the constitutive Ci repressor form, UAS-ci CELL was overexpressed in clones (not shown). We therefore infer that Hh signalling is needed to remove the Ci repressor form in the NPR, rather than directly activating Dap expression.
These genetic experiments with the Hh and Dpp pathways point to several substantial conclusions. 1) Both pathways are required to promote the last coordinated mitosis previous to the G1 arrest. 2) G1 arrest in the anterior region of the NPR depends primarily on Dpp signalling. 3) More generally, G1 arrest is regulated differentially in the anterior and posterior of the NPR; in neither region is Ci-dependent activation required. 4) There is a redundancy between Hh and Dpp in the control of dE2F1 activity in the posterior of the NPR. 5) There is a non-redundant requirement for Hh to activate Dap expression (and thereby inhibit Cyclin E) in the posterior of the NPR; this activation requires Smo but, again, not Ci. Together, these data imply that while there is some redundancy between Hh and Dpp signalling in the control of the NPR, non-overlapping functions can also be identified. They also imply that, contrary to an earlier report , Hh and Dpp signalling do not comprise the whole mechanism of G1 arrest: in the posterior region of the NPR, some other factor must prevent cells from S-phase entry, even when Hh and Dpp signalling are completely blocked.
A secondary role for Atonal in maintaining G1 arrest?
Ato expression in the NPR is induced by both Hh and Dpp pathways . Together with the involvement of other proneural genes in G1 arrest in the wing margin , this suggests a possible role of this gene in the establishment of the NPR. However, we did not observe ectopic BrdU positive cells in Ato loss-of-function clones encompassing the NPR (Fig. 4E). On the other hand, about 55% of Atonal overexpression clones showed a clear precocious entry into the NPR (Fig. 4F), suggesting that Atonal may influence mitotic progression prior in the NPR.
Rux is necessary for the G1 arrest in the NPR
rux8 clones also displayed slight ectopic activation of the PCNA-GFP transgene in the NPR (Fig. 5C) suggesting that the powerful activation of S-phase in these clones might rely on more than just Cyclin A activation. However, since Rux is reported to be a specific regulator of Cyclin A, and is therefore not expected to affect dE2F1 activity directly, we tested whether this upregulation of dE2F1 was triggered by Cyclin A activity. Indeed, Cyclin A overexpression was also able to induce weakly the PCNA reporter in the NPR (Fig. 5D), suggesting that the slight gain of dE2F1 activity in rux clones was indirect.
Rux antibodies are not sensitive enough to detect the endogenous protein by immunofluorescence, so the expression pattern of rux in the eye disc was analysed using a rux-lacZ transgene that is able to rescue the rux phenotype and is therefore thought to represent faithfully the expression of the gene . rux-lacZ is expressed generally in the eye disc, including in the NPR, with a decrease just posterior to the morphogenetic furrow as the second mitotic wave initiates (Fig. 5F). Expression of rux was not dependent on Dpp or Hh signalling: rux-lacZ was not down-regulated in smo tkv double mutant clones. On the contrary, rux-lacZ was elevated, indicating that Hh and Dpp normally repress rux expression in the second mitotic wave (Fig. 5G). This result is consistent with our other data that imply that Hh and Dpp are important determinants of G1 arrest only in the anterior domain of the NPR. In the posterior domain, when the cells have developed further, Cyclin A and Rux become the key regulators of G1 arrest.
Mitotic synchrony vs. G1 Arrest
In this paper we have focused on the mechanism of G1 arrest in the eye imaginal disc, the first overt sign of retinal differentiation. Although the NPR has sometimes been considered to be merely the beginning of the morphogenetic furrow, our 3D image analysis clearly shows that it initiates well before the cells alter their shape. Just anterior to the cells arrested in G1, there is a increased number of mitotic cells suggesting a coordinated activation of their entry into mitosis. This could represent the subset of cells that are in S or G2 phases and that are accelerated through the cell cycle in order to become arrested in G1. We have shown that Hh and Dpp both have a novel role in this first mitotic synchronisation. This could be mediated by String (the homologue of Cdc25 phosphatase in Drosophila) since its RNA is upregulated in these cells . Obviously, not all cells will be poised to enter mitosis immediately upon receiving these signals but we imagine that their function is to drive cells through mitosis with as little delay as possible.
Based on several lines of published evidence and our data [17–19], we estimate that cells in the NPR spend only a little more time in G1 phase than the proliferating anterior cells of the eye disc (see above). Coupled with the sharp onset of G1-arrest, this implies that the NPR is at least partly a consequence of cells being triggered to enter G1 synchronously. However, the observation that the loss of tkv causes ectopic S-phase entry in the anterior part of the NPR, and the fact that G1-phase is extended, albeit not greatly, both indicate the existence of a mechanism for preventing cells precociously entering S-phase in the NPR. In other words, we conclude that the NPR is a consequence of a combination of cell cycle synchronisation and specific arrest mechanisms.
Dpp and Hh make distinct contributions to G1 arrest
The data presented here, coupled with several previous reports, point to the control of the NPR being dependent on multiple inputs. The earliest stage we observe is the Hh and Dpp-dependent wave of mitosis that immediately precedes the NPR; this synchronises cells at the start of the NPR. Immediately afterwards, the trigger for cells to not re-enter S-phase is primarily Dpp, which is secreted by cells immediately posterior to the MF and diffuses anteriorly to exert its effects [8, 11]. We see little evidence for substantial Hh involvement in this G1 initiation step. Later in development, and therefore more posteriorly in the NPR, there is again more pronounced redundancy between Dpp and Hh, in the regulation of dE2F1 activity. tkv mutant cells show ectopic dE2F1 activity in the anterior region of the NPR but not in the posterior region. Cells that are mutant for both tkv and smo, however, activate dE2F1 across the whole NPR, indicating that in the posterior region, a combination of Dpp and Hh signalling contributes to G1 arrest. The distinction between the regulation of G1 arrest in anterior and posterior regions of the NPR, an indication that as cells mature their requirements change, is further emphasised by the non-redundant posterior requirement of Smo for the expression of Dacapo, a Cyclin E inhibitor. This implies that Hh signalling from the cells posterior to the furrow contributes to G1 arrest in the final stages of the NPR, although loss of this signalling does not induce S-phase. This illustrates a major theme of our work, that G1 arrest in the NPR is maintained by multiple mechanisms.
Overall, one of the main conclusions we draw from these data is that, together, Dpp and Hh exert precise regulation of two S-phase activators, Cyclin E and dE2F1, both of which must be kept in check in the NPR.
Our data also suggest that Atonal (which is activated in the NPR by Hh and Dpp) might play a secondary role in the onset of the NPR. Although loss of ato alone does not affect the NPR, indicating that the G1 arrest induced by Hh, Dpp and Rux does not absolutely require Atonal function, we found that the overexpression of ato just anterior to the NPR, can sometimes accelerate G1 entry. Interestingly, this is similar to the phenotype of ci LOF clones  in which there is this precocious entry into G1. As ci clones show an upregulation of Ato (our unpublished results), this provides a possible explanation of the earlier result.
The core cell cycle components that we have analysed are of course widely conserved, as are their functions. In this paper we have focused on the precise regulation of G1 arrest in one tissue – the eye imaginal disc – where Hh and Dpp induce development. Comparing our data with what has been shown in other systems, we conclude that different signalling pathways are used to regulate the cell cycle machinery in different contexts. The important point is that a precise and highly regulated set of developmental signals are used to ensure proper control of G1 and S-phase entry.
Repression of Cyclin A is necessary for G1 arrest
The central role of Dpp and Hh signalling in initiating mitotic synchrony and maintaining G1 arrest in the NPR is consistent with the primary and exclusive role these signals have in driving the progress of eye development. It was therefore a surprise to find that blocking Dpp and Hh reception was not sufficient to trigger S-phase efficiently in posterior cells of the NPR. This particular conclusion contradicts that of Firth and Baker , who ascribed G1 arrest fully to Dpp and Hh-dependent processes. We do not know the cause of this disagreement but note that we have included their mutant stock in our study and obtained a different result from that which they report. In addition, our results are consistent with earlier data that de-repression of Cyclin E and dE2F1 is not sufficient to induce S-phase entry in the posterior of the NPR: for example, ectopic BrdU incorporation was seen in anterior regions of the NPR in clones of cells mutant for the Cyclin E inhibitors dap and archipelago, and the dE2F1 inhibitor, rbf. Even in double mutant clones that derepress Cyclin E and dE2F1, there is only a weak activation of S-phase in the posterior ([7, 13, 14]; our unpublished results). Together, these experiments confirm that the inhibitors of Cyclin E and dE2F1 are present and contribute to G1 arrest in the NPR. However, the relatively weak phenotype of their loss (at least in the posterior region) emphasises the presence of another inhibitory factor, which we have shown to be the dedicated inhibitor of Cyclin A, Rux.
Loss of Rux or overexpression of Cyclin A was sufficient to trigger ectopic S-phases, even when normal Dpp and Hh signals were present. Importantly, we have shown that rux expression does not require Dpp and Hh signalling, implying that control of the NPR by Cyclin A is distinct from that by Cyclin E and dE2F1. Since rux is expressed across the whole of the NPR territory, we envisage that it may provide a fixed barrier to S-phase entry, which must be overcome when cells legitimately enter S-phase in the second mitotic wave. Consistent with this view of Rux function, we observed no disturbance of the entry of cells into the NPR in rux mutants (not shown). This importance of Cyclin A further supports the growing body of evidence for an S-phase function for this more famously mitotic cyclin. This role also has been clearly identified in mammals where, although there is not a rux homologue, there are multiple controls that mediate Cyclin A inhibition in G1-phase.
From a synthesis of our data with previous work, we propose the following outline of the full course of events that lead to the regulated synchronisation and arrest of proliferation in the NPR. As the morphogenetic furrow advances towards more anterior cells, they first experience the secreted Dpp and Hh signals that induce a coordinated entry into mitosis (the so-called first mitotic wave). After that, Dpp (but not Hh) causes them to downregulate Cyclin E levels and dE2F1 activity, thereby preventing S-phase entry and arresting them in G1. As the approaching furrow gets closer, and the cells mature in the posterior region of the NPR, other controls come into play. Most notably, Hh secreted from cells posterior to the furrow upregulates Dap expression, further ensuring the inactivity of Cyclin E. Hh also contributes at this stage to the repression of dE2F1. In addition to these signal dependent controls, Rux contributes to G1 maintenance by its inhibition of Cyclin A.
This overlapping set of mechanisms for ensuring that cells do not enter S-phase precociously appears strangely complex and redundant. Presumably this is a measure of the importance of this developmental regulation of proliferation. In the posterior region of the NPR, cells must prepare themselves for imminent changes as they begin either to differentiate as photoreceptors, or to re-enter S-phase for the terminal division of the second mitotic wave. These later decisions are precisely controlled by an overlapping and reiterated set of signals, including Hh and Dpp themselves [7, 27, 40]. The mechanism by which the same signals are used reiteratively to specify distinct fates could be confusing to a cell and is not fully understood by us, but is thought to rely on distinct transcriptional consequences of signals received by cells at different stages of their development. Perhaps the addition of Cyclin A repression and Dap expression in this important transitional region adds a failsafe mechanism to ensure the precise onset of retinal differentiation.
The following alleles were used: ato1, smo3, tkva12, ci94, Mad12, rux8, UAS-ato, UAS-cycA, UAS-cycE, UAS-dE2F1, UAS-Dp. All stocks are described in . We used two reporter lines: PCNA-GFP  and rux-lacZ .
Immunohistochemistry and BrdU labelling
Imaginal discs from third instar larvae were stained as described in . The following antibodies were used. Guinea pig anti-Ato (1:100) (gift of H. Bellen); rabbit anti-Arm ; rabbit (Cappel) and mouse anti-β-Galactosidase; rabbit anti-GFP (kind gift of Rob Arkowitz); mouse anti-BrdU (1:10) (Becton Dickinson); rat anti-Ci (diluted 1:5) ; mouse anti-CycB (diluted 1:2); mouse anti-Dap (1:50) (gift of I. Hariharan); rabbit anti-phosphohistone H3 (1:100) (Upstate). Rat anti-E-cadherin (1:20), rat anti-Elav (1:100); and anti-CycB (1:5) were obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma bank at the University of Iowa.
For BrdU labelling, imaginal disc were dissected and incubated with 200 μg/ml BrdU (Sigma) in PBS for 50 min. BrdU-labelled cells were detected as described previously .
Confocal imaging and 3D reconstruction
For 3D reconstruction, eye imaginal discs were mounted between two strips of double side adhesive tape, using Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech). Discs were analyzed with a BioRad Radiance 2100 laser scanning confocal. Z-series were projected for three-dimensional reconstruction using Volocity 2.5.1 software.
Generation of mosaics
Mitotic clones were generated by FLP-mediated mitotic recombination . Recombination was induced in second instar larvae (60 hr AEL) by a 120 min heat shock at 37°C. Mutant clones were marked in each case by the absence of β-gal antibody, Ci antibody, or GFP antibody staining.
Mutant clones were obtained of the following genotypes:
y w hsF; Mad12 FRT40A/M [ci+] FRT40A; ci94 
y w hsF; tkva12 FRT40A/M [ci+] FRT40A; ci94 
y w hsF; tkva12 FRT40A/ubi-GFP FRT40A
y w hsF; tkva12 FRT40A/arm-lacZ FRT40A; PCNA-GFP
y w hsF; smo3 FRT40A/ubi-GFP FRT40A
y w hsF; smo3 tkva12 FRT40A/ubi-GFP FRT40A
y w hsF; smo3 tkva12 FRT40A/ubi-GFP FRT40A; rux-lacZ/+
y w hsF; smo3 tkva12 FRT40A/arm-lacZ FRT40A; PCNA-GFP/+
y w hsF; smo3 tkva12 FRT40A/arm-lacZ M(2)z FRT40A
rux8 FRT18A/ubi-GFP FRT18A; hsF/+
rux8 FRT18A/arm-lacZ FRT18A; hsF/+; PCNA-GFP/+
y w hsF; ato1 FRT82B/arm-lacZ M(3)w124 FRT82B
Clones of cells expressing Gal4  were induced 48–72 hr after egg laying by 20 min heat shocks at 37°C. To generate clones of cells overexpressing UAS-ato, UAS-cycA, UAS-cycE, UAS-dE2F1, UAS-Dp, males carrying the different transgenes or combinations of them were crossed with y w hsF; act-FRT y+ FRT-Gal4 UAS-GFP/SM6a-TM6b Tb females. In the case of the analysis of the PCNA-GFP expression in clones of UAS-cycA, males y w hsF;UAS-cycA; PCNA-GFP were crossed with y hsF; ubx-FRT f + FRT-Gal4 UAS-lacZ nls /CyO females. Overexpressing clones were marked by the presence of GFP or β-gal staining in each case.
We thank Nick Baker, Hugo Bellen, Eva Caminero, José Casal, Sonsoles Campuzano, Marc de la Roche, Iswar Hariharan, Helena Richardson and Barbara Thomas for generously supplying reagents and stocks. We thank LMB colleagues for helpful discussions. Katherine Brown and Antonio Baonza helped us greatly with useful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported in part by a grant from the Association for International Cancer Research.
- Deshpande A, Sicinski P, Hinds PW: Cyclins and cdks in development and cancer: a perspective. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 2909-2915. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208618.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolff T, Ready DF: Pattern formation in the Drosophila retina. The development of Drosophila melanogaster. Edited by: Bate M and Martinez-Arias A. 1993, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
- Ready DF, Hanson TE, Benzer S: Development of the Drosophila retina, a neurocrystalline lattice. Devl Biol. 1976, 53: 217-240. 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90225-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thomas BJ, Gunning DA, Cho J, Zipursky SL: Cell cycle progression in the developing Drosophila eye: Roughex encodes a novel protein required for the establishment of G1. Cell. 1994, 77: 1003-1014. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90440-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker NE: Cell proliferation, survival, and death in the Drosophila eye. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2001, 12: 499-507. 10.1006/scdb.2001.0274.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duman-Scheel M, Johnston LA, Du W: Repression of dMyc expression by Wingless promotes Rbf-induced G1 arrest in the presumptive Drosophila wing margin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 3857-3862. 10.1073/pnas.0400526101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Firth LC, Baker NE: Extracellular signals responsible for spatially regulated proliferation in the differentiating Drosophila eye. Dev Cell. 2005, 8: 541-551. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.01.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horsfield J, Penton A, Secombe J, Hoffman FM, Richardson H: decapentaplegic is required for arrest in G1 phase during Drosophila eye development. Development. 1998, 125: 5069-5078.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs HW, Keidel E, Lehner CF: A complex degradation signal in Cyclin A required for G1 arrest, and a C-terminal region for mitosis. Embo J. 2001, 20: 2376-2386. 10.1093/emboj/20.10.2376.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnston LA, Edgar BA: Wingless and Notch regulate cell-cycle arrest in the developing Drosophila wing. Nature. 1998, 394: 82-84. 10.1038/27925.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Penton A, Selleck SB, Hoffmann FM: Regulation of cell cycle synchronization by decapentaplegic during Drosophila eye development. Science. 1997, 275: 203-206. 10.1126/science.275.5297.203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richardson H, Okeefe LV, Marty T, Saint R: Ectopic cyclin E expression induces premature entry into S phase and disrupts pattern formation in the Drosophila eye imaginal disc. Development. 1995, 121: 3371-3379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Du W: Suppression of the rbf null mutants by a de2f1 allele that lacks transactivation domain. Development. 2000, 127: 367-379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moberg KH, Bell DW, Wahrer DC, Haber DA, Hariharan IK: Archipelago regulates Cyclin E levels in Drosophila and is mutated in human cancer cell lines. Nature. 2001, 413: 311-316. 10.1038/35095068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas BJ, Zavitz KH, Dong X, Lane ME, Weigmann K, Finley RL, Brent R, Lehner CF, Zipursky SL: roughex down-regulates G2 cyclins in G1. Genes Dev. 1997, 11: 1289-1298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomlinson A: The cellular dynamics of pattern formation in the eye of Drosophila. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985, 89: 313-331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Basler K, Siegrist P, Hafen E: The spatial and temporal expression pattern of sevenless is exclusively controlled by gene-internal elements. EMBO J. 1989, 8: 2381-2386.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xin S, Weng L, Xu J, Du W: The role of RBF in developmentally regulated cell proliferation in the eye disc and in Cyclin D/Cdk4 induced cellular growth. Development. 2002, 129: 1345-1356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnston LA, Prober DA, Edgar BA, Eisenman RN, Gallant P: Drosophila myc regulates cellular growth during development. Cell. 1999, 98: 779-790. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81512-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dimova DK, Dyson NJ: The E2F transcriptional network: old acquaintances with new faces. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 2810-2826. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208612.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thacker SA, Bonnette PC, Duronio RJ: The contribution of E2F-regulated transcription to Drosophila PCNA gene function. Curr Biol. 2003, 13: 53-58. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01400-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jarman AP, Grau Y, Jan LY, Jan YN: atonal is a proneural gene that directs chordotonal organ formation in the Drosophila peripheral nervous system. Cell. 1993, 73: 1307-1321. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90358-W.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jarman AP, Grell EH, Ackerman L, Jan LY, Jan YN: atonal is the proneural gene for Drosophila photoreceptors. Nature. 1994, 369: 398-400. 10.1038/369398a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gibson MC, Schubiger G: Drosophila peripodial cells, more than meets the eye?. Bioessays. 2001, 23: 691-697. 10.1002/bies.1098.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knoblich JA, Sauer K, Jones L, Richardson H, Saint R, Lehner CF: Cyclin E controls S phase progression and its down regulation during Drosophila embryogenesis is required for the arrest of cell proliferation. Cell. 1994, 77: 107-120. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90239-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dyson N: The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins. Genes Dev. 1998, 12: 2245-2262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baonza A, Freeman M: Control of cell proliferation in the Drosophila eye by Notch signaling. Dev Cell. 2005, 8: 529-539. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.01.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ito K, Awano W, Suzuki K, Hiromi Y, Yamamoto D: The Drosophila mushroom body is a quadruple structure of clonal units each of which contains a virtually identical set of neurones and glial cells. Development. 1997, 124: 761-771.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Du W, Vidal M, Xie JE, Dyson N: RBF, a novel RB-related gene that regulates E2F activity and interacts with cyclin E in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1996, 10: 1206-1218.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trimarchi JM, Lees JA: Sibling rivalry in the E2F family. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002, 3: 11-20. 10.1038/nrm714.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hooper JE, Scott MP: Communicating with Hedgehogs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 6: 306-317. 10.1038/nrm1612.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenwood S, Struhl G: Progression of the morphogenetic furrow in the Drosophila eye: the roles of Hedgehog, Decapentaplegic and the Raf pathway. Development. 1999, 126: 5795-5808.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vrailas AD, Moses K: smoothened, thickveins and the genetic control of cell cycle and cell fate in the developing Drosophila eye. Mech Dev. 2006, 123: 151-165. 10.1016/j.mod.2005.11.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Nooij JC, Letendre MA, Hariharan IK: A cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, Dacapo, is necessary for timely exit from the cell cycle during Drosophila embryogenesis. Cell. 1996, 87: 1237-1247. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81819-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lane ME, Sauer K, Wallace K, Jan YN, Lehner CF, Vaessin H: Dacapo, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, stops cell proliferation during Drosophila development. Cell. 1996, 87: 1225-1235. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81818-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fu W, Baker NE: Deciphering synergistic and redundant roles of Hedgehog, Decapentaplegic and Delta that drive the wave of differentiation in Drosophila eye development. Development. 2003, 130: 5229-5239. 10.1242/dev.00764.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pappu KS, Chen R, Middlebrooks BW, Woo C, Heberlein U, Mardon G: Mechanism of hedgehog signaling during Drosophila eye development. Development. 2003, 130: 3053-3062. 10.1242/dev.00534.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Avedisov SN, Krasnoselskaya I, Mortin M, Thomas BJ: Roughex mediates G(1) arrest through a physical association with cyclin A. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 8220-8229. 10.1128/MCB.20.21.8220-8229.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gonczy P, Thomas BJ, DiNardo S: roughex is a dose-dependent regulator of the second meiotic division during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Cell. 1994, 77: 1015-1025. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90441-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duman-Scheel M, Weng L, Xin S, Du W: Hedgehog regulates cell growth and proliferation by inducing Cyclin D and Cyclin E. Nature. 2002, 417: 299-304. 10.1038/417299a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flybase. [http://flybase.bio.indiana.edu]
- Gaul U, Mardon G, Rubin GM: A putative Ras GTPase activating protein acts as a negative regulator of signaling by the Sevenless receptor tyrosine kinase. Cell. 1992, 68: 1007-1019. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90073-L.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de la Roche M, Bienz M: Wingless-Independent Association of Pygopus with dTCF Target Genes. Curr Biol. 2007, in press:Google Scholar
- Slusarski DC, Motzny CK, Holmgren R: Mutations that alter the timing and pattern of cubitus interruptus gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1995, 139: 229-240.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker NE, Yu SY: The EGF receptor defines domains of cell cycle progression and survival to regulate cell number in the developing Drosophila eye. Cell. 2001, 104: 699-708. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00266-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu T, Rubin GM: Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development. 1993, 117: 1223-1237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.