Open Access

A zebrafish screen for craniofacial mutants identifies wdr68 as a highly conserved gene required for endothelin-1 expression

BMC Developmental Biology20066:28

DOI: 10.1186/1471-213X-6-28

Received: 10 March 2006

Accepted: 07 June 2006

Published: 07 June 2006

Abstract

Background

Craniofacial birth defects result from defects in cranial neural crest (NC) patterning and morphogenesis. The vertebrate craniofacial skeleton is derived from cranial NC cells and the patterning of these cells occurs within the pharyngeal arches. Substantial efforts have led to the identification of several genes required for craniofacial skeletal development such as the endothelin-1 (edn1) signaling pathway that is required for lower jaw formation. However, many essential genes required for craniofacial development remain to be identified.

Results

Through screening a collection of insertional zebrafish mutants containing approximately 25% of the genes essential for embryonic development, we present the identification of 15 essential genes that are required for craniofacial development. We identified 3 genes required for hyomandibular development. We also identified zebrafish models for Campomelic Dysplasia and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. To further demonstrate the utility of this method, we include a characterization of the wdr68 gene. We show that wdr68 acts upstream of the edn1 pathway and is also required for formation of the upper jaw equivalent, the palatoquadrate. We also present evidence that the level of wdr68 activity required for edn1 pathway function differs between the 1st and 2nd arches. Wdr68 interacts with two minibrain-related kinases, Dyrk1a and Dyrk1b, required for embryonic growth and myotube differentiation, respectively. We show that a GFP-Wdr68 fusion protein localizes to the nucleus with Dyrk1a in contrast to an engineered loss of function mutation Wdr68-T284F that no longer accumulated in the cell nucleus and failed to rescue wdr68 mutant animals. Wdr68 homologs appear to exist in all eukaryotic genomes. Notably, we found that the Drosophila wdr68 homolog CG14614 could substitute for the vertebrate wdr68 gene even though insects lack the NC cell lineage.

Conclusion

This work represents a systematic identification of approximately 25% of the essential genes required for craniofacial development. The identification of zebrafish models for two human disease syndromes indicates that homologs to the other genes are likely to also be relevant for human craniofacial development. The initial characterization of wdr68 suggests an important role in craniofacial development for the highly conserved Wdr68-Dyrk1 protein complexes.

Background

The widespread success of the vertebrate lineage owes partly to the acquisition of the neural crest (NC)-derived jaw apparatus of the craniofacial skeleton [1]. The adult craniofacial skeleton forms through replacing and elaborating the underlying NC-derived embryonic cartilaginous skeleton. The pathways and mechanisms that form the embryonic cartilaginous jaw are still poorly understood and many genes involved in this process remain to be identified. The rapid development of the jaw cartilages in the zebrafish and its amenability to forward genetics makes it an excellent model organism for studying the genetic basis of craniofacial development [24]; additionally, the use of retroviral insertional mutagenesis can facilitate the cloning of a large number of mutated genes [5, 6].

Morphological development of the zebrafish pharyngeal cartilages has been described in detail [79]. Briefly, the chondrocytes that form these embryonic cartilages are derived from cranial NC cells that migrate from the neural tube to occupy transient embryonic structures called the pharyngeal arches. The NC cells in the 1st arch give rise to the upper and lower jaw cartilages in all vertebrates examined. In zebrafish, the Meckel's cartilage (M) serves as the embryonic lower jaw and the palatoquadrate (PQ) serves as the embryonic upper jaw. The NC cells in the zebrafish 2nd arch give rise to cartilages that support the jaw apparatus and anchor it to the neurocranium.

Extensive work in mice [10, 11], chick [12], and zebrafish [1315] has shed substantial light on the pathways that pattern the NC cells within an arch. The endothelin-1 (edn1) pathway is essential for patterning the NC cells that give rise to the lower jaw. Edn1 is a small peptide ligand secreted by the pharyngeal pouch ectoderm and endoderm cells as well as by the arch core mesoderm. As shown in other vertebrates, Edn1 signals through binding to a seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor (EdnrA) expressed on the NC cells to regulate a downstream network of transcription factors [1618]. In zebrafish, the downstream network includes members of the distal-less (dlx) gene family, hand2 and bapx1 [13, 19, 20]. Although recent evidence has shed light on how some of these downstream factors function in patterning the craniofacial skeleton, the upstream patterning events and pathways that lead to induction of edn1 are less clear. Notably, it has been reported that the transcription factor tbx1 functions upstream of edn1 signaling in the AB* zebrafish background [21]. Also, it has recently been reported that tbx1 is essential for Meckel's cartilage formation in Xenopus [22]. However, tbx1-/- mice do not present Meckel's cartilage defects [2325]. Importantly, tbx1-/- mice do show reduction of the 1st arch-derived incus, a middle ear ossicle, indicating a role for tbx1 in 1st arch development [26]. Yet, edn1-/- mice do not lack the incus [27]. Thus, the genes and mechanisms upstream of the edn1 pathway in Meckel's cartilage development remain unclear. Although it is possible that regulation of edn1 is different between mammals and either frog or fish, an alternative possibility is that a more universal and highly conserved pathway may await discovery.

To shed light on the pathways required for craniofacial patterning, we screened a collection of embryonic lethal insertional mutant zebrafish lines (for which the mutated gene had been identified in over 90% of cases) using the cartilage stain Alcian blue and inspected the mutants for defects in the craniofacial skeleton at 5 days post fertilization (dpf). We screened 306 genetic loci and identified 16 loci required for craniofacial development. We identified the mutated genes for 15 of these 16 loci. Two of the identified genes are known to be mutated in the human diseases Campomelic Dysplasia and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and thus those two mutants might serve as zebrafish models for these diseases. Also among these mutants, we identified the dirty south (dys) mutant that harbors an insertion in the wdr68 gene. Wdr68 is a WD40 repeat domain protein of unknown function homologous to the petunia gene AN11 that regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis and it is also highly homologous to the Arabidopsis gene TTG1 that regulates root, shoot and leaf patterning events [28, 29]. Wdr68 has been isolated from rabbit skeletal muscle in protein complexes containing two members of the Dual-specificity tyrosine-regulated kinase gene family, Dyrk1a and Dyrk1b [30]. Dyrk1a-/- mice show general growth defects [31]. Notably, DYRK1A maps to a critical region for Down Syndrome (DS) in humans and over-expression of Dyrk1a in mice has been reported to cause DS-like neurological defects [32, 33]. RNAi-mediated knockdown of Dyrk1b in the mouse myoblast cell line C2C12 causes a loss of myogenin expression and blocks in vitro differentiation of the cells into myotubes [34]. Thus, roles are emerging for Dyrk1 gene family members in various developmental processes [35, 36].

Here, we show that wdr68 is required for lower jaw cartilage formation upstream of the edn1-signaling pathway. We also present evidence that wdr68 is required to form the upper jaw cartilage indicating that wdr68 activity is essential for all 1st arch NC cell patterning. We demonstrate intracellular co-localization with nuclear Dyrk1a and present evidence suggesting that nuclear localization may be important for craniofacial patterning. Using an RNA rescue assay, we found that the fly wdr68 homolog CG14614 can rescue the dys mutant phenotype indicating conservation of wdr68 activity in animals lacking the NC cell lineage.

Results

Screening identified diverse genes involved in craniofacial development

A list of all the genes identified in the Hopkins lab by insertional mutagenesis screening has been published [6]. The insertional mutant collection can also be viewed online [37]. To identify genes required for craniofacial development we screened the insertional mutant collection at 5 days post fertilization using the cartilage stain Alcian blue. We inspected 306 recessive-lethal insertional mutant loci for defects in the craniofacial cartilages (Figure 1A, C). Briefly, the 1st arch NC cells give rise to the zebrafish jaw that consists of a proximal palatoquadrate (PQ) that articulates with the distal Meckel's (M) cartilage. The 2nd arch NC cells give rise to the hyosymplectic and ceratohyal (CH). The hyosymplectic is composed of a proximal hyomandibular (HM) region and a distal symplectic (SY) region. The hyosymplectic articulates with the distal CH and together these 2nd arch-derived structures support the more anterior jaw by anchoring it to the neurocranium [8, 9]. Through inspecting these cartilages, we identified 3 specific cartilage phenotype classes (Classes 1–3 listed in Table 1). To identify specific craniofacial development mutants, we excluded mutants that, in addition to anterior arch defects, also showed progressive loss of the posterior arches.
Figure 1

The anterior arch mutants. A, C, E, G, I, K), morphology at 4dpf. B, D, F, H, J, L), flat mounted alcian blue stained pharyngeal cartilages. Red asterisks indicate the location of the joint between the M and PQ cartilages. Black asterisks indicate the joint between the CH and hyosymplectic cartilages. A, B) wild type. C, D) HM reduction mutant womhi2914. E, F) HM reduction allele sec61a hi1058 . G, H) HM reduction allele sec61a hi2839B . I, J) anterior arch mutant csnk1a1 hi2069 . M* and CH* are readily identified but dysmorphic. K, L) Meckel's and PQ reductions in mutant dyshi3812. Most homozygous dys/dys animals show 'strong' reductions in the PQ such that only a posterior region of PQ is readily identifiable. M cartilage and the SY region are also strongly reduced. Joint fusion of the CH and HM region are also often present. M, N, O) Typically less than 5% of dys/dys animals show 'mild' reductions or joint fusions. M) Mild dys/dys animal showing only M-PQ and CH-HM joint fusions. N) Mild dys/dys animal showing intermediate PQ splitting in the presence of a well formed M that is fused to the anterior region of the PQ. O) Mild dys/dys animal showing complete PQ splitting but identifiable anterior and posterior PQ regions. The nos/foxI1 and laz/pbx4 mutants have been previously described and are therefore not shown.

Table 1

Craniofacial development insertional mutants

Class 1- Anterior arch patterning

Alleles

Gene

Phenotype

hi933, hi1126

lazarus/pbx4 (lzr)

arch fusions

hi1002, hi2069

csnk1a1

M, PQ defects

hi3812

dirty south/wdr68 (dys)

M, PQ defects

hi1058, hi2839B

sec61a

HM reduction

hi2914

word of mouth/LOC321614-2 (wom)

HM reduction

hi1321, hi1359A

no soul/foxI1 (nos)

HM reduction

hi3239, hi3747

  

Class 2 – Chondrocyte differentiation

Alleles

Gene

Phenotype

hi307, hi4205

b3gat3

reduced staining

hi954, hi3357

uxs1

reduced staining

hi1134

jellyfish/sox9a (jef)

reduced staining

hi1516, hi4063A

b4galt7

reduced staining

hi3378

slc35d1

reduced staining

hi3681

atp6ap2

reduced staining

hi4153

srp68

reduced staining

Class 3 – Cell morphology

Alleles

Gene

Phenotype

hi1487

gonzo/mbtps1 (goz)

mildly poor stacking

hi1688, hi1934

knypek/glp6 (kny)

mildly poor stacking

hi1042

old skool (odk)

poor stacking

The anterior arch patterning class contains 6 mutant loci with specific patterning defects in the arch 1 derivatives, the arch 2 derivatives or both (Table 1, Figure 1). Studies on lazarus/pbx4 mutants revealed essential roles in neural tube development and maintaining separate neural crest streams [38]. Previous characterization of the nos/foxI1 mutant revealed the importance of cell survival signals in HM formation and additional screening identified two additional loci required for HM development, word of mouth (wom) and sec61a (Figure 1 C–H) [14]. We identified 2 alleles of sec61a and although the sec61ahi1058 allele shows general defects that complicate analysis, the sec61ahi2839B allele lacks the anterior portion of the HM (aHM) region but clearly retains the posterior HM (pHM) region (compare regions separated by red dotted lines in Figure 1A, H). Notably, the wom mutant also appears to lack the aHM region and retain the pHM region. In contrast, the nos/foxI1 mutant lacks both the aHM and pHM regions

The chondrocyte differentiation class contains 7 mutant loci with generally impaired overall chondrogenesis (Table 1). Among these mutants is the previously characterized jellyfish/sox9a (jef) mutant that is a zebrafish disease model for Campomelic Dysplasia [39, 40]. We also identified a mutation in the glycosaminoglycan biosynthetic enzyme b4galt7 that represents a new zebrafish disease model for the progeroid form of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome [see Additional file 1].

The cell morphology class contains 3 mutant loci that are required for proper chondrocyte morphology (Table 1). The gonzo and knypek mutants have been previously described [41, 42]. We have not yet identified the gene disrupted in the old skool (odk) mutant [see Additional file 1].

We performed blast searches against the current human protein database using the predicted protein sequences for the 15 identified zebrafish genes. In 15/15 cases, a human homolog to the zebrafish protein was readily identified. The average amino acid sequence identity between the fish and human homologs was 77% and ranged from 47% to 99% identity (Table 2). Database analysis also revealed diverse cellular functions and protein domain architectures for the identified genes. Notably, 4 of the 7 chondrocyte differentiation mutants function in the glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis pathway highlighting the importance of this pathway in chondrogenesis and related disease states. Also, 2 of the 15 genes function in the ER protein secretory pathway, 2 genes function in Wnt signaling, 3 encode transcription factors and 2 encode WD40-repeat domain proteins. Thus, the genes we identified as essential for craniofacial development in the zebrafish appear to function in diverse cellular processes and are highly conserved in humans suggesting they may also be essential for human craniofacial development.
Table 2

Conservation of identified proteins between fish and human.

Zebrafish

Human

%Identity

Cellular process or protein domains

Pbx4

PBX4

81%

transcription factor

Csnk1a1

CSNK1A1

99%

S/T kinase in Hedgehog/Wnt signaling

Wdr68

WDR68

97%

WD40-repeats

Sec61a

SEC61A1

96%

ER protein export pathway

LOC321614-2

UNQ9342

93%

WD40-repeats

FoxI1

FOXI1A

47%

transcription factor

B3gat3

B3GAT3

58%

Glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis

Uxs1

UXS1

88%

Glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis

Sox9a

SOX9

70%

transcription factor

B4galt7

B4GALT7

65%

Glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis

Slc35d1

SLC35D1

80%

Glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis

Atp6ap2

ATP6AP2

68%

integral membrane protein

Srp68

SRP68

79%

ER protein export pathway

Mbtps1

MBTPS1

85%

sterol/lipid metabolism

Glp6

GPC6

55%

Wnt signaling

Phenotype of the dirty south (dys) mutant and identification of wdr68as the mutated gene

The dirty south (dys) mutants display variably reduced M and PQ cartilages with variable reductions in the CH as well (Figure 1K, L). The mutant was named in reference to the variable lower jaw cartilage defects. Through inspecting large numbers of Alcian blue stained dys mutant animals we found that most dys mutants displayed the 'strong' phenotype of severe reductions in both the M and PQ with small clusters of cartilage cells possibly derived from either the M or PQ or both often present (M? and PQ in Figure 1L). Although in most dys mutant animals the CH was present, we occasionally observed dys mutant animals that lacked one of the two bilaterally symmetric CH cartilages (data not shown). In fact, we often observed asymmetric defects where cartilages on one side would appear more severely reduced than on the contra-lateral side (data not shown). Also, less than 5% of observed dys mutants showed mild defects instead of the more severe losses described above. These 'mild' defect animals tended to show only simple joint fusions between otherwise relatively normal M and PQ as well as CH and HM cartilages (Figure 1M, red asterisk indicates 1st arch joint region, black asterisk indicates 2nd arch joint region). The PQ is composed of two distinct regions. The ptergoid process (PTP) is a thin rod of chondrocytes that extends anteriorly from the planar body of the PQ. A small percentage of dys mutants showed restrictions of the planar mid-region of the PQ with what appears to be an identifiable anterior PTP region and posterior planar PQ body region (Figure 1N). The distal M cartilage was always observed in these animals, albeit fused to the anterior region of what might be the PTP. Occasionally, we observed what appears to be complete splitting of the PQ planar body (Figure 1O).

The dys locus encodes the 342 amino acid protein Wdr68 [6]. Genome database searches revealed only one wdr68 gene in the human, mouse, and fish although we cannot rule out the possibility that the genome databases are incomplete. The insertion is in the first exon of the wdr68 gene, 131 nucleotides downstream from the predicted translation initation site (Figure 2A). RT-PCR analysis revealed that dyshi3812 is a null mutant (Figure 2B). Notably, wdr68 transcripts are readily detected by RT-PCR in wild type animals at all developmental stages including unfertilized oocytes (Figure 2C). As a negative control, edn1 transcripts, which are not detectable by ISH until late somitogenesis stages, could not be detected by RT-PCR in unfertilized oocytes or in samples earlier than 10 hpf (Figure 2C). Although the observed cartilage phenotype variation outlined in figures 1 L–O might be due to residual maternal wdr68 activity in the dys mutants, we cannot rule out the possibility that this observed phenotypic variation may result from the independent segregation of an unknown number of modifier loci.
Figure 2

The dys hi3812 mutant is a null. A) Diagram indicating the location of the dyshi3812 proviral insert in the first exon of the wdr68 gene. B) RT-PCR analysis of wild type siblings and dys/dys animals showing that wild type wdr68 transcripts are not detectable in the dys mutants indicating that the mutant is a null allele. C) RT-PCR analysis reveals a maternal supply of wdr68 transcripts. cDNA from wild type embryos at zero = unfertilized, 3 hpf, 6 hpf, 10 hpf, and 19 hpf. As negative control, edn1 transcripts are only detected after 10 hpf. Transcripts for the ribosomal gene rpL35 are present at all stages examined.

The wdr68gene is expressed ubiquitously during early development

Consistent with the RT-PCR data indicating the presence of wdr68 transcripts at all early stages of development, we found by whole-mount in situ hybridization (ISH) ubiquitous expression of wdr68 at sphere, tailbud, 5 somites and 10 somites stages (Figure 3A, B, C, D). By the 20 somites stage, some enrichment of transcripts in the forebrain and hindbrain regions could be detected and patterned expression in the developing somites was also apparent (Figure 3E). Also, transcripts could be observed lateral to the neural tube in a region that would correspond to the post-migratory NC cells at this stage (Figure 3F). By 24 hpf, wdr68 transcripts were significantly enriched in the head region relative to the tail region (Figure 3G). By 28 hpf, restricted expression of wdr68 was evident in the developing somites (Figure 3H). By 34 hpf, wdr68 transcripts were expressed strongly in almost all head structures and only expressed at very low levels in the tail region (Figure 3I, K). ISH analysis on dys mutant animals was not able to detect any wdr68 expression consistent with the RT-PCR results indicating that the dyshi3812 allele encodes a null mutation of the wdr68 gene (Figure 3J). Notably, wdr68 transcripts were detected from sphere stage through to 34 hpf in all regions of the embryo currently known to play roles in craniofacial development including the pharyngeal pouches.
Figure 3

Expression pattern for the wdr68 gene during early development. A) Transcripts are present in all cells of the animal at sphere stage. B) Ubiquitous expression at tailbud stage. C) Ubiquitous expression at 5 somites stage. D) Ubiquitous expression at 10 somites stage. E) Ubiquitous expression with modest enrichment in the forebrain and hindbrain at 20 somites stage. Also note emerging patterned expression in the developing somites. F) Dorsal view of same 20 somites stage animal indicating ubiquitous expression. G) Ubiquitous expression with moderate enrichment in the head region at 24 hpf. H) Higher magnification image of a 28 hpf animal to show patterned expression in somites. I, J) Wild type sibling and dys/dys homozygous mutant at 34 hpf. I) Enriched expression in the head region with much lower expression in somites in a 34 hpf wild type sibling animal. J) Absence of detectable wdr68 transcripts in the dys/dys homozygous mutant sibling. K) Dorsal view of head region of 34 hpf animal showing near ubiquitous expression in developing head structures.

To further confirm that the dys mutant phenotype is caused by the proviral insertion disrupting the wdr68 locus, we designed two translation blocking antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (wdr68MO and wdr68MO2) to the wdr68 transcript. We found that both gave similar results and that both gave the similar range of variable M, PQ, SY and CH defects as were observed for the dys mutant (wildtype controls in Figure 4A, B and mutants or morphants in Figure 4C, D and data not shown). The images in Figure 4 depict the craniofacial apparatus in whole-mount embryos in contrast to the dissected flat-mounted cartilages shown in Figure 1.
Figure 4

wdr68 activity is required for all 1 st arch cartilage formation. A), C), E), G) Lateral views of Alcian blue stained animals at 4dpf. B), D), F), H) Ventral views of Alcian blue stained animals at 4dpf. In panels D, F, and H the posterior arches were removed to enhance clarity for observing the anterior arch defects. A), B) Wild type sibling. C), D) Representative 'strong' phenotype dys/dys animal similar to that shown flatmounted in figure 1 panel D with incomplete loss of M and PQ cartilages. The wdr68MO when injected into wild type animals yields a phenotype very similar to that shown here in panels C and D. E), F) Injecting dys/dys animals with antisense wdr68MO causes complete loss of the PQ, M and CH but does not substantially reduce the HM region. G), H) Representative edn1MO knockdown animal lacking the M and CH but retaining the PQ and HM regions.

wdr68 activity is required for all 1starch cartilage formation

In performing titrations of the wdr68MO we noted that low concentrations tended to cause only mild cartilage joint fusion defects while higher concentrations were more similar to the defects observed in dyshi3812/dyshi3812 homozygotes and occasionally yielded more severe reductions in the PQ and CH regions. Since RT-PCR analysis indicated that wdr68 transcripts are maternally supplied we reasoned that zygotic dys mutants probably harbor some residual amount of maternally supplied wdr68 activity. Likewise, antisense morpholino knockdowns are not 100% efficient at blocking translation and therefore residual wdr68 activity would likely also be present in the knockdown animals. Thus, we injected clutches of embryos from dyshi3812/+ parental crosses with the wdr68MO (dys+wdr68MO) and stained the cartilages with Alcian blue in an attempt to reveal more clearly what might be the phenotype for a more complete loss of wdr68 activity. We found that approximately 3/4 of the embryos were similar to wild type animals injected with the wdr68MO and showed the range of phenotypes typically observed for dys/dys homozygotes leading us to suspect they represent the expected mendelian 3/4 of +/+ and dys/+ animals (Figure 4C, D and data not shown). In contrast, we found that approximately 1/4 of the injected animals nearly completely lacked the M, PQ, SY and CH cartilages (Figure 4E, F). A negative control morpholino had no effect in wild type embryos and did not significantly exacerbate the cartilage defects in clutches of embryos from dyshi3812/+ parental crosses (data not shown). We found similar results using wdr68MO2 (data not shown).

We compared the dys+wdr68MO animals to animals injected with a previously characterized edn1 translation blocking morpholino (edn1MO) that is reported to nearly fully phenocopy the defects present in edn1 mutant zebrafish [43]. Similar to previous reports we found that edn1 is required for the formation of the M, SY and CH cartilages but not for the PQ or HM regions (Figure 4G, H). In contrast, we found that dys mutants also present defects in the PQ that seem to affect the anterior PTP region more strongly than the posterior planar PQ region (Figure 1L). Attempts to reduce wdr68 activity from maternally supplied transcripts through generating dys+wdr68MO animals showed almost complete loss for the M, PQ, SY and CH (Figure 4E, F). Thus, wdr68 activity appears to be required for all edn1-dependent cartilages plus the PTP and PQ regions.

wdr68activity is not required for normal NC cell migration

Since defects in NC cell migration might lead to the loss or malformation of craniofacial elements, we used a dlx2 probe in whole-mount ISH to determine whether cranial NC cell migration occurs normally in dys mutant animals. We could not detect any alterations in the migration of the 3 cranial NC cell streams that fill the 1st, 2nd and posterior arches at the 12 somites stage suggesting that neither cranial NC cell induction or migration is severely altered in dys mutants (Figure 5A).
Figure 5

wdr68 acts upstream of the edn1 pathway. A) In situ hybridization (ISH) with dlx2 on 12 somites stage embryos. Wild type and dys/dys mutant animals were indistinguishable. B) ISH on 20 somites stage wild type sibling animal with edn1 probe. C) dys/dys homozygotes display reduced edn1 expression at 20 somites stage. D) ISH on 28 hpf wild type sibling animal with edn1 probe. E) dys/dys homozygotes display reduced edn1 expression at 28 hpf. F) ISH on 41 hpf wild type sibling with bapx1 probe. G) dys/dys homozygotes display reduced bapx1 expression. H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O) Red arrowhead indicates 1st arch expression domain, blue arrowhead indicates 2nd arch expression domain. H) ISH on 28 hpf wild type sibling with hand2 probe. I) dys/dys homozygotes display reduced 1st arch hand2 expression, red arrowhead. Red dotted outline indicates expression in developing heart. J) dys+wdr68MO animals display reduced hand2 expression in both 1st and 2nd arches, red and blue arrowheads, respectively. K) edn1-MO animals lack hand2 expression in both the 1st and 2nd arches. L, M, N, O) Red asterisk indicates olfactory expression domain. Black asterisk indicates ear expression domain. L) ISH on 28 hpf wild type sibling with dlx3b probe. M) dys/dys homozygotes display reduced 1st arch dlx3b expression, red arrowhead. N) dys+wdr68MO animals display reduced dlx3b expression in both 1st and 2nd arches, red and blue arrowheads, respectively. O) edn1-MO animals lack dlx3b expression in both the 1st and 2nd arches. P, Q, R, S) Red underline indicates 1st arch region for sox9a expression. Black underline indicates 2nd arch region for sox9a expression. P) ISH with sox9a probe on 28 hpf wild type sibling. Q) Reduction of 1st arch sox9a expression without significant effect on 2nd arch sox9a expression in dys/dys animals. R) Injecting dys animals with wdr68MO caused further reduction of 1st arch sox9a expression without substantial effects on 2nd arch sox9a expression. S) edn1-MO animals show reduced but still detectable sox9a expression in both the 1st and 2nd arches.

wdr68activity is required for endothelin-1 expression

Because loss of wdr68 activity caused defects in all edn1-dependent cartilage elements plus the PQ, we examined whether wdr68 might act upstream of the edn1 pathway [43]. Using an edn1 probe in whole-mount ISH, we found that while edn1 was readily detected in wild type siblings at the 20 somites stage, dyshi3812/dyshi3812 animals had severely reduced edn1 transcript levels (Figure 5B, C). To rule out the possibility that there might be a mild delay in edn1 expression, we also examined expression at 28 hpf and found expression to also be severely reduced at this later stage (Figure 5D, E). We left the 28 hpf animals unbleached to indicate the relatively normal development of the neural crest that give rise to melanocytes to further indicate the absence of a general developmental delay in dys mutant animals (Figure 5D, E). Notably, low and slightly variable levels of edn1 transcripts were detected in the dys mutants at both the 20 somites stage and later at the 28 hpf stage. Variation in the residual levels of edn1 transcripts may account for some of the observed phenotypic variation (Figure 1L–O). For additional evidence that wdr68 is required for edn1 pathway activity we also examined several downstream components of the edn1 pathway. bapx1 is a transcription factor required for induction of the jaw joint that is edn1-dependent [19]. In situ hybridization with bapx1 probe showed that while readily detected in wild type siblings, dyshi3812/dyshi3812 animals had severely reduced bapx1 transcript levels (Figure 5F, G). The transcription factors hand2 and dlx3b are also edn1-dependent and in situ hybridization likewise showed that dyshi3812/dyshi3812 animals had reduced transcript levels (Figure 5H, I and Figure 5L, M). Notably, only the arch-specific expression domains for both hand2 and dlx3b were affected indicating that a general delay in embryonic development cannot explain the absence of expression in the arches (Figure 5H, I, J, K the red dotted outline indicates the unaffected expression of hand2 in developing heart. Figure 5L, M, N, O the red and black asterisks indicate the unaffected olfactory and otic expression domains of dlx3b, respectively). Also, the 1st arch domains for both markers was more reduced than the 2nd arch domains perhaps explaining the relatively milder 2nd arch derived CH cartilage reductions. (red arrowheads indicate 1st arch, blue arrowheads indicate 2nd arch, Figures 5H, I and 5L, M). Examining edn1 expression at this relatively late developmental stage, 28 hpf, revealed a similar difference with 1st arch edn1 expression more reduced than 2nd arch edn1 expression (red arrowheads indicate 1st arch, blue arrowheads indicate 2nd arch, Figure 5D, E).

Analyzing the cartilages of dys+wdr68MO animals suggested that wdr68 activity is required for all edn1-dependent cartilage development. To more precisely explore this possibility, we generated dys+wdr68MO animals and processed them for ISH analysis to determine whether the residual expression of hand2 and dlx3b we observed in the 2nd arch is wdr68-dependent. We found that 2nd arch expression of hand2 and dlx3b was consistently more reduced in approximately 1/4 of the dys+wdr68MO animals. The further reduction of 2nd arch expression is not due to a non-specific general developmental delay because expression of hand2 in the developing heart was not affected and development of the NC cell-derived melanocytes was not affected in the animals analyzed for hand2 expression (dotted outlined structure is heart expression, Figure 5H–K). Likewise, expression of dlx3b in the developing olfactory and otic domains was not substantially affected in the dys+wdr68MO animals (red and black asterisks, respectively, Figure 5L–O). We also compared the expression of hand2 and dlx3b to edn1MO animals and found that dys+wdr68MO animals more closely resemble edn1MO animals than do the dys mutants but that directly blocking edn1 expression does yield more complete reductions suggesting that dys+wdr68MO animals still harbor some residual edn1 signaling (Figure 5K, O). We also found that wdr68 activity is similarly required for the arch-specific expression domains of dlx4a, dlx4b, dlx5a and dlx6a (data not shown). Expression of the dlx genes was also edn1-dependent (data not shown). Collectively, these data indicate that wdr68 activity is required for edn1 expression and its downstream targets.

In zebrafish, as in mammals, chondrocyte differentiation requires the activity of a sox9 transcription factor [39, 40]. To determine whether wdr68 activity is also required for chondrocyte differentiation, we examined expression of the zebrafish sox9a gene. Like the other arch markers, we found that 1st arch expression was more reduced than 2nd arch expression in dys mutants (1st arch red underline, 2nd arch black underline, Figure 5P, Q, R). Consistent with edn1MO animals having a relatively normal PQ, we detected some residual sox9a expression in the 1st arch of those animals (red underline, Figure 5S). In all cases, residual sox9a expression in the 2nd arch region likely reflects the relatively normal formation of the HM region (Figure 1L).

The tbx1 gene has been shown to regulate edn1 expression in the AB* zebrafish line [21]. However, loss of tbx1 causes less severe defects in the Tubingen zebrafish line, perhaps due to differences in modifier loci between the AB* and Tubingen lines [44]. Since the insertional mutant lines were generated and are maintained on TAB5 and TAB14, two lines derived from a cross between Tubingen and AB* [45], we cannot readily predict the role for tbx1 in the lines used in this study. Regardless, we examined the expression of tbx1 in dys animals and found normal expression at 24 hpf and at most only modest reduction of tbx1 expression in the pharyngeal region at 30 hpf (data not shown). Therefore, wdr68 does not appear to be essential for tbx1 expression and tbx1 expression alone is not sufficient for edn1 expression in our lines.

Arch identity underlies the differential sensitivity to wdr68activity

The observation that the 1st arch derived M and PQ cartilages were consistently more severely reduced than the 2nd arch derived CH and HM cartilages in dyshi3812/dyshi3812 animals suggested that perhaps 1st arch patterning requires more wdr68 activity than 2nd arch patterning. ISH analysis of hand2 and dlx3b expression also suggests that 1st arch patterning requires more wdr68 activity than 2nd arch patterning. Consistently, injecting animals with antisense translation blocking morpholinos increased the severity of 2nd arch cartilage and gene expression phenotypes. To test whether wdr68 activity is differentially required between the 1st and 2nd arches, we hypothesized that if the 1st arch structures require higher levels of wdr68 activity than the 2nd arch structures, then transformation of the 2nd arch into a duplication of the 1st arch would result in near complete absence of all jaw cartilages. The NC cells within the 1st arch do not express the hox transcription factor genes that are expressed by NC cells within the 2nd arch. Loss of hox transcription factor activity in the 2nd arch causes transformation into 1st arch identity. Likewise, it has been shown that loss of the hox transcription factor co-activator moz/myst3 causes transformation of the 2nd arch into a duplication of the 1st arch [4651]. Therefore, we injected clutches of embryos from dyshi3812/+ parental crosses with an antisense morpholino against moz/myst3 (mozMO3) and stained for cartilages. In approximately 3/4 of the animals, we observed transformation of the 2nd arch derivatives into a duplication of the 1st arch cartilages (Figure 6A, B). These animals were phenotypically indistinguishable from wild type TAB5 and TAB14 animals injected with mozMO3 consistent with the notion that these animals represent the +/+ and dyshi3812/+ siblings as expected based on mendelian genetics. The slightly less complete nature of these transformations relative to results previously reported might be due to differences between the zebrafish lines used in this study versus the previously reported study [51]. In contrast, approximately 1/4 of the animals lacked virtually any jaw cartilages (Figure 6C, D). We reason, based on mendelian ratios, that these animals are likely to be the dyshi3812/dyshi3812 animals. The strong reduction of the transformed 2nd arch derivatives is consistent with a differential requirement for wdr68 activity along the A/P axis. These results together with the ISH data on edn1, hand2 and dlx3b support a model in which the level of wdr68 activity required for 1st arch-associated edn1 expression is higher than that required for 2nd arch-associated edn1 expression explaining why dys/dys animals display relatively milder 2nd arch defects than would be predicted for a gene required upstream of edn1.
Figure 6

Transformation of 2 nd arch identity transforms 2 nd arch wdr68 sensitivity. A, C) Lateral views at 4dpf. B, D) Ventral views at 4dpf. A, B) Wild type animal injected with mozMO transforms 2nd arch cartilage elements into mirror image duplicates of 1st arch cartilages. C, D) Injecting dys animals with mozMO reveals similar cartilage losses as in maternal wdr68 knockdowns shown in (Fig. 4E, F) but with further reduction of HM region presumably through mirror image duplication of the missing 1st arch cartilages.

Wdr68 protein localizes to the cell nucleus

The only proteins known to physically interact with Wdr68 are Dyrk1a and Dyrk1b [30]. Dyrk1a has been observed to localize within the nucleus [52]. To determine whether Wdr68 also localizes to the cell nucleus we constructed mRFP1-Dyrk1a and GFP-Wdr68 fusion protein vectors and transiently transfected HEK-293FT cells with various combinations of the vectors [53]. As controls, empty GFP and mRFP1 vectors were both detected throughout the cell (Figure 7A–D). Consistent with previous reports on Dyrk1a localization, the mRFP1-Dyrk1a fusion protein localized to the nucleus when co-expressed with an empty GFP vector (data not shown). The GFP-Wdr68 fusion protein also localized to the nucleus when co-expressed with an empty mRFP1 vector (data not shown). When expressed together, GFP-Wdr68 and mRFP1-Dyrk1a co-localized to the nucleus (Figure 7E–H). In all cases, the locations of nuclei were determined using DAPI.
Figure 7

The Wdr68 protein co-localizes with Dyrk1a. Transiently transfected HEK-293FT cells. A, E, I) Fluorescence of GFP and fusion proteins. B, F, J) Fluorescence of mRFP1 and fusion proteins. C, G, K) Fluorescence of nuclei stained with DAPI. D, H, L) Composite overlay image of GFP, RFP and DAPI signals. A, B, C, D) GFP and mRFP1 distribute throughout the cytoplasm and nucleus. E, F, G, H) The GFP-Wdr68 fusion and the mRFP1-Dyrk1a fusion are co-localized to the nucleus. I, J, K, L) The GFP-T284F Wdr68 mutant does not co-localize with nuclear mRFP1-Dyrk1a.

In Arabidopsis, there are at least 3 wdr68 homologs with Clustal W sequence similarity ranging from 54% to 45%. Among these are the protein TTG1, which is essential for root and shoot patterning events including axis patterning of the leaf. Among several strong Arabidopsis ttg1 mutant alleles, ttg1-9 encodes a point mutation that changes a single serine to a phenylalanine, S282F [28]. This position is within a region of the protein that is highly conserved across all organisms examined and all multicellular animals code for the chemically similar threonine at this position (highlighted in red in Figure 8A). Thus we engineered the corresponding putative null T284F mutation into the zebrafish wdr68 gene. To determine whether the engineered putative null T284F can still localize with nuclear Dyrk1a, we constructed a GFP-T284F fusion. The T284F fusion protein failed to co-localize with mRFP1-Dyrk1a (Figure 7I–L).
Figure 8

wdr68 activity is functionally conserved. A) Sequence similarity scores generated using ClustalW between wdr68 homologs among selected representative organisms. Region shown contains the functionally important position, highlighted in red, identified in the ttg1-9 allele. B) The T284F mutant cannot rescue the dys mutant phenotype. Live 4dpf animal shown. C) The drosophila homolog CG14614 rescues the dys mutant phenotype as efficiently as the zebrafish transcripts. D) Alcian blue staining of attempted rescue animals using T284F transcripts. E) Alcian blue staining of animals rescued using the drosophila homolog CG14614. F) Chart summarizing the results of a rescue experiment showing that zebrafish wdr68 transcripts rescue the strong mutant phenotype, that T284F transcripts fail to rescue, and that CG14614 rescues as efficiently as zebrafish wdr68.

wdr68activity is conserved in animals lacking NC cells

BLAST analysis with wdr68 revealed the presence of wdr68 homologs in all eukaryotic organisms for which complete genome sequence is available including non-vertebrate animals like Drosophila [54]. Using Clustal W to determine sequence similarities [55], the Drosophila homolog, CG14614, is 84% similar to the zebrafish gene. To determine whether CG14614 is a functional homolog to the vertebrate protein, we developed an RNA rescue assay for the dys mutant cartilage phenotype. We injected dys mutant clutches with FLAG-tagged zebrafish wdr68 transcripts and compared them to either uninjected animals or animals injected with ef1α transcripts as a negative control (Table 3 and data not shown). While ef1α transcripts were unable to rescue the mutant phenotype, zebrafish wdr68 rescued the strong cartilage patterning defects causing a concomitant increase in the number of observed mild joint fusion animals (Figure 8F). We also tested the engineered T284F mutant in the RNA rescue assay. The T284F transcript was unable to rescue the cartilage defects consistent with the prediction that this encodes a null allele similar to the plant homolog (live in Figure 8B, Alcian blue in Figure 8D, graph in Figure 8F). We then tested CG14614 for the ability to rescue the cartilage defects present in the dys mutant zebrafish. Remarkably, CG14614 rescued the strong cartilage defects as efficiently as the zebrafish wdr68 transcripts (live in Figure 8C, Alcian blue in Figure 8E, graph in Figure 8F). Thus, wdr68 activity is functionally conserved from animals that lack NC cells.
Table 3

RNA rescue of the dys mutant phenotype.

 

Jaw phenotype

 

Transcript injected

wild type

strong

mild

none

109 (81%)

21 (16%)

5 (4%)

ef1α

107 (79%)

23 (17%)

6 (4%)

wdr68

123 (80%)

5 (3%)

26 (17%)

T284F

83 (77%)

17 (16%)

8 (7%)

CG14614

94 (76%)

4 (3%)

26 (21%)

Discussion

Insights from screening for craniofacial mutants

As the zebrafish insertional mutant collection represents approximately 25% of the genes essential during the first 5 days and this screen identified 16 loci, we can extrapolate that at least 80 genes essential during the first 5 days of development are also required for craniofacial development in the zebrafish [6]. Genes essential for very early developmental events such as gastrulation may have been missed in this screen. Similarly, not all defects in craniofacial patterning will necessarily result in lethality by day 5 in the zebrafish. Thus, the range of approximately 80 genes establishes a lower limit on the total number of genes required for craniofacial development.

Previous large-scale ENU screens identified a group of anterior arch mutants with defects in the distal cartilages and most appear to function within the edn1 pathway [3, 56]. Notably, the edn1 pathway controls distal cartilage fate in both the 1st and 2nd arches [10, 13]. Neither previous screens nor our screening identified a complementary pathway controlling all proximal cartilage fate. However, 3 of the 6 identified patterning mutants have specific reductions in the proximal 2nd arch derived HM region without affecting the proximal 1st arch PQ implying that distinct pathways control the patterning of the HM region.

Previous studies on the nos/foxI1 mutant indicated that HM formation requires cell survival signals [14]. Analysis of a zebrafish integrin-alpha-5 mutant that displays a reduced aHM region also revealed an essential role for NC cell survival signals [15]. Interestingly, the wom and sec61a genes might be required for aHM formation due to roles in mediating cell survival through processes typically viewed as general 'housekeeping' activities. At 29% sequence similarity, the closest yeast homolog to wom is Swd2p, an essential subunit of the Set1 histone methyltransferase (HMT) complex required for transcription of many genes. Interestingly, differential HMT substrate specificity by different regulatory complexes containing different SET domains is one feature of the proposed 'histone code' for epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation [57]. Also, Swd2p is a required subunit in the cleavage and polyadenylation factor complex [5860]. The sec61 complex is essential for protein translocation into the ER. Thus, HM formation may require cell survival signals together with high expression levels of a relatively limited number of apparent housekeeping genes that perhaps mediate rate-limiting steps in survival pathways. Alternatively, paralogs with partial functional redundancy for these presumably cell-essential genes may compensate in other tissues.

wdr68 activity is essential for edn1-dependent distal cartilage formation

We showed that wdr68 activity is required for edn1 expression. We also provided evidence that higher levels of wdr68 activity are required for 1st arch edn1 expression and expression of downstream edn1-dependent genes such as hand2 and dlx3b than are required for 2nd arch edn1 expression, providing an explanation as to why defects in the 2nd arch appear less severe in dys mutants than in edn1MO animals. The 2nd arch likely requires lower levels of wdr68 activity for induction of the edn1 pathway. We also found that tbx1 expression was not substantially reduced in dys mutants or wdr68MO animals suggesting that wdr68 either acts downstream of tbx1 or in a parallel pathway also required for edn1 expression.

wdr68activity is essential for proximal PQ and PTP formation

Unlike edn1 mutants, which retain an identifiable and intact PQ, dys mutants display severe disruptions of the PTP and PQ. Thus, wdr68 activity is required for all edn1-dependent cartilages plus the 1st arch proximal edn1-independent PQ region indicating that wdr68 activity is required upstream of a putative PQ formation pathway. Future studies will be needed to identify the putative wdr68-dependent PQ formation pathway genes. Also, the PTP of the PQ appears to serve as the maxilla region at this early developmental stage. Therefore, it would be very informative to generate and analyze a wdr68-/- mouse for defects in the pharyngeal arch derivatives. Such an analysis would also shed substantial light on the evolution of craniofacial structures.

The Wdr68 and Dyrk1a proteins both localize to the nucleus

The nuclear localization of mammalian Dyrk1a has been previously reported and the biochemical purification of a large protein complex from rabbit skeletal muscle that contains both Wdr68 and Dyrk1a suggests that Wdr68 might also localize to the cell nucleus [30]. Our observation that a zebrafish GFP-Wdr68 fusion indeed localizes to the nucleus is consistent with the formation of an intra-nuclear Wdr68-Dyrk1 protein complex (Figure 7). Since the Wdr68 T284F mutant was not able to complement the craniofacial defects of dys mutant animals in the RNA rescue assay, the failure of the Wdr68 T284F mutant to localize to the nucleus may suggest that nuclear localization of Wdr68 is required for craniofacial development. The change from a nuclear to a punctate cytoplasmic localization may also indicate that nuclear localization of Wdr68 requires some additional feature associated with having a hydroxyl group at position 284 such as the ability to accept phosphorylation. However, punctate cytoplasmic expression patterns can also indicate misfolding or destabilization and degradation of a fusion protein. Thus, a more detailed biochemical analysis of the Wdr68-Dyrk1 interaction will be required to determine the true significance of these observed changes.

The Wdr68-Dyrk1 protein complex is conserved in all eukaryotes

The fly homolog CG14614 rescued the strong cartilage defects as efficiently as the zebrafish wdr68 transcripts, indicating that the molecular functions of wdr68 required by arthopods is the same as that required by vertebrates. Notably, the Wdr68 interaction partners Dyrk1a and Dyrk1b are homologs to the Drosophila minibrain (mnb) gene, suggesting conservation of a protein complex [61]. Although the expression pattern for dyrk1b has not been reported, in mice, ISH analysis revealed expression of dyrk1a in the pharyngeal arches and the dyrk1a-/- animals showed severe growth delay and were lethal by E13.5 [31]. Although the dys mutants showed only a modest reduction in overall body size, we found that wdr68 co-localized in the nucleus with Dyrk1a (Figure 7). Thus, it will be worthwhile to investigate whether the zebrafish dyrk1 genes might have roles in craniofacial development. The observation that Dyrk1a intracellular localization undergoes dynamic changes during brain development in the chick suggests that the Wdr68-Dyrk1 complexes may function as signaling intermediates [62]. Likewise, the finding that Dyrk1b is required for the differentiation switch in myotubes suggests that the Wdr68-Dyrk1 protein complexes might function in diverse organisms and tissues to regulate various developmental events [34].

High throughput mass spectrometric identification of protein complexes in yeast identified the Wdr68 homolog YPL247C in 2 complexes, containing 6 and 13 proteins each, and both complexes contain the Dyrk1 homolog YAK1 [63]. Thus, Wdr68-Dyrk1 protein complexes are conserved from yeast to mammals.

Detailed studies of YAK1 indicate that it is required for pseudohyphal differentiation and functions in growth control [64, 65]. YAK1 may act within the Target of Rapamycin (TOR) pathway as rapamycin induces nuclear localization of YAK1 and YAK1 deletion confers rapamycin resistance in certain strains [66]. Thus, the presence of wdr68 homologs in unicellular eukaryotes such as S. cerevisiae further suggests that Wdr68-Dyrk1 protein complexes participate in switches from growth to differentiation. Further studies will be required to determine how the Wdr68-Dyrk1 protein complexes function and what role they might play in craniofacial development.

Conclusion

Our data reveal the identity of approximately 25% of the essential genes required for craniofacial development in the zebrafish and demonstrate functional conservation between the fly and fish wdr68 homologs. We further show that the wdr68 gene is required upstream of the edn1 signaling pathway and that it localizes to the cell nucleus. One intriguing possibility is that a nuclear Wdr68-Dyrk1 protein complex may act as a transcriptional co-regulatory complex. Exploring this possibility will require further characterization of the complex as well as downstream putative target genes.

Methods

Animal husbandry and Alcian blue cartilage staining

Animals were maintained as described [45]. The Alcian blue staining method used in this study has been previously described [14].

RT-PCR and whole-mount in situ hybridization analysis

The primers used to compare wild type to mutant animals by RT-PCR and to create plasmids for generating anti-sense probes for ISH are 3812-f1 5'-ATCTTTCAGACCAAATGCGCCGTTG and 3812-r1 5'-CCTCATTCTCCCAGACGAAAGAAG. Total RNA was isolated from equal numbers of either wild type or mutant animals by the TRIZOL method essentially as described by the manufacturer (Invitrogen). First strand cDNA synthesis using a poly dT primer and PCR from this material was performed as previously described using actin primers as controls [14]. The corresponding PCR fragments were subcloned into the pCR-TOPO bluntII (Invitrogen) vector to yield the plasmid pCR-3812. To make the 1st strand cDNA samples for comparison of the various developmental stages, animals were harvested at the appropriate time points and processed by the TRIZOL method. Unfertilized oocytes were harvested by squeezing an anesthetized female and eggs were processed by the TRIZOL method. The primers used to compare wdr68 across the various developmental stages are 3812-f2 5'-GATCGCCATTTGCTACAACAACTGC and 3812-r1 5'-CCTCATTCTCCCAGACGAAAGAAG. The primers used for edn1 are edn1-start1 5'-ATGCATTTGAGGATTATTTTCCCAGTTCTGAC-3' and edn1-stop1 5'-CTATGAGTTTTCAGAAATCCACGCTTGG-3'. The primers to compare rpL35 are 258-RTF2 5'-GCTGCTTCCAAGCTCTCAAAAATCC-3' and 258-RTR 5'-TGCCTTGACGGCGAACTTGCGAATG-3'. The ISH method was as previously described with all probes at a final concentration of 200ng/mL [14]. The edn1 plasmid has been previously described [13]. The bapx1 plasmid has been previously described [19]. The hand2 plasmid has been previously described [67]. The dlx3b plasmid has been previously described [68]. The sox9a plasmid has been previously described [40].

Antisense morpholinos used in this study

The morpholino sequences used in this study for the wdr68 gene are 3812-1 5'-GAAGCATGTCGTTGCACGGTAAACG-3' (sense control), wdr68MO 5'-CGTTTACCGTGCAACGACATGCTTC-3' and wdr68MO2 5'-CATGCTTCAATCCCAGTGATCGGCG-3'. The edn1-MO sequence has been previously reported [13]. The moz-MO3 sequence has been previously reported [51].

Wild type and dys mutant clutches were injected with morpholino concentrations ranging from 100 uM to 1 mM for the wdr68 sequences or 200 uM for the edn1-MO using pulled glass needles and a picospritzer as previously described [14]. The dys+wdr68MO animals received an approximate 1 nL injection of 1 mM wdr68MO. The wdr68MO2 sequence was fully active at 300 uM. Comparable injections with the 3812-1 control sequence had no effect on cartilage formation.

RNA rescue

The wdr68 open reading frame was amplified using primers 3812-FLAGf 5'-taatagaattccaccATGGATTACAAGGATGACGACGATAAGggtATGTCactcCAtGGcAAgCGAAAAGAGATCTACAAATACGAGGCG-3' and 3812-stop1 5'-ctcgagCTACACCCGCAGGATCTCCAGG-3' and subcloned into the pCS2+ vector as an EcoRI-XhoI fragment. The T284F mutation was created by nested amplification of primer T284F-f1 5'-CACCTCATTCCTCCTGCCACATATGTtttGCAGTAGCGGACGATCACCAG -3'with 3812-stop1 and 3812-FLAGf with T284F-r1 5'-CTGGTGATCGTCCGCTACTGCaaaACATATGTGGCAGGAGGAATGAGGTG -3' followed by mixing of the products and further amplification with the outer primers 3812-FLAG-f1 and 3812-stop1. Sequencing confirmed the presence of the T284F mutation subcloned into the pCS2+ vector. The Drosophila homolog CG14614 was amplified from 1st strand Drosophila cDNA using primers dmWDR68-f2 5'-ttcttcgaattccaccATGTCCTCGACCGCCGGAAAGC-3' and dmWDR68-r2 5'-ttcttctcgtcgacTTAGACCCGCAGGATCTCGCACG-3', digested with EcoRI and SalI and subcloned into the EcoRI and XhoI sites of the pCS2+ vector. All rescue constructs were linearized using NotI and capped mRNA was synthesized using the mMessage mMachine kit essentially as described by the manufacturer (Ambion). The xenopus ef1a control transcript was supplied as the control template in the kit. All mRNA were quantified and ran on an agarose gel to confirm synthesis. Mutant clutches were injected as described for the morpholinos with approximately 1 nL of a 5 ng/uL solution of each RNA containing 0.1% phenol red. Animals were processed for Alcian blue staining at 4dpf.

Intracellular localization

The GFP open reading frame from pEGFP-C2 (Clontech) was subcloned as a Eco47III-EcoRI fragment into the ClaI(blunted)-EcoRI sites of the pCS2+WDR68 vectors to yield pCS2+GFP-WDR68 and pCS2+GFP-T284F. The mRFP1 open reading frame was PCR amplified using primers mRFP1-start 5'-ttcttgaattccaccATGGCCTCCTCCGAGGACG-3' and mRFP1-nonstop 5'-ttcttcttctcgagagatctgatatcGGCGCCGGTGGAGTGGCGGCCCT-3' from a bacterial expression vector [53]. The mRFP1 PCR fragment was subcloned into pCS2+ as an EcoRI-XhoI fragment. The mouse DYRK1A coding sequence was amplified from E17 stage mouse embryo total RNA using primers mh-DYRK1A-f1 5'-ttcttcttagatctATGCATACAGGAGGAGAGACTTCAGC -3' and mh-DYRK1A-r1 5'-ttcttcttctcgagTCACGAGCTAGCTACAGGACTCTGTTG-3'. The DYRK1A PCR fragment was subcloned into pCS2+mRFP1 as a BglII-XhoI fragment.

Transient transfection of the fluorescent protein fusion plasmids into HEK-293FT cells grown in glass chamber slides was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) as per the manufacturers protocol. Cells were fixed and visualized approximately 20–24 hours post-transfection.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Enrico Montana for the kind gift of the Drosophila 1st strand cDNA sample. I would also like to thank Kirsten Edepli for a critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the NIH.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Cancer Research and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(2)
Department of Biological Sciences, California State University Los Angeles

References

  1. Carroll RL: Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. 1988, W. H. Freeman and Company, 698-Google Scholar
  2. Neuhauss SC, Solnica-Krezel L, Schier AF, Zwartkruis F, Stemple DL, Malicki J, Abdelilah S, Stainier DY, Driever W: Mutations affecting craniofacial development in zebrafish. Development. 1996, 123: 357-367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Piotrowski T, Schilling TF, Brand M, Jiang YJ, Heisenberg CP, Beuchle D, Grandel H, van Eeden FJ, Furutani-Seiki M, Granato M, Haffter P, Hammerschmidt M, Kane DA, Kelsh RN, Mullins MC, Odenthal J, Warga RM, Nusslein-Volhard C: Jaw and branchial arch mutants in zebrafish II: anterior arches and cartilage differentiation. Development. 1996, 123: 345-356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Schilling TF, Piotrowski T, Grandel H, Brand M, Heisenberg CP, Jiang YJ, Beuchle D, Hammerschmidt M, Kane DA, Mullins MC, van Eeden FJ, Kelsh RN, Furutani-Seiki M, Granato M, Haffter P, Odenthal J, Warga RM, Trowe T, Nusslein-Volhard C: Jaw and branchial arch mutants in zebrafish I: branchial arches. Development. 1996, 123: 329-344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Golling G, Amsterdam A, Sun Z, Antonelli M, Maldonado E, Chen W, Burgess S, Haldi M, Artzt K, Farrington S, Lin SY, Nissen RM, Hopkins N: Insertional mutagenesis in zebrafish rapidly identifies genes essential for early vertebrate development. Nat Genet. 2002, 31 (2): 135-140. 10.1038/ng896.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Amsterdam A, Nissen RM, Sun Z, Swindell EC, Farrington S, Hopkins N: Identification of 315 genes essential for early zebrafish development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101 (35): 12792-12797. 10.1073/pnas.0403929101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schilling TF, Kimmel CB: Segment and cell type lineage restrictions during pharyngeal arch development in the zebrafish embryo. Development. 1994, 120 (3): 483-494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kimmel CB, Miller CT, Keynes RJ: Neural crest patterning and the evolution of the jaw. J Anat. 2001, 199 (Pt 1-2): 105-120. 10.1017/S0021878201008068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kimmel CB, Miller CT, Kruze G, Ullmann B, BreMiller RA, Larison KD, Snyder HC: The shaping of pharyngeal cartilages during early development of the zebrafish. Dev Biol. 1998, 203 (2): 245-263. 10.1006/dbio.1998.9016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kurihara Y, Kurihara H, Suzuki H, Kodama T, Maemura K, Nagai R, Oda H, Kuwaki T, Cao WH, Kamada N, et al: Elevated blood pressure and craniofacial abnormalities in mice deficient in endothelin-1. Nature. 1994, 368 (6473): 703-710. 10.1038/368703a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Depew MJ, Lufkin T, Rubenstein JL: Specification of jaw subdivisions by Dlx genes. Science. 2002, 298 (5592): 381-385. 10.1126/science.1075703.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kempf H, Linares C, Corvol P, Gasc JM: Pharmacological inactivation of the endothelin type A receptor in the early chick embryo: a model of mispatterning of the branchial arch derivatives. Development. 1998, 125 (24): 4931-4941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller CT, Schilling TF, Lee K, Parker J, Kimmel CB: sucker encodes a zebrafish Endothelin-1 required for ventral pharyngeal arch development. Development. 2000, 127 (17): 3815-3828.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nissen RM, Yan J, Amsterdam A, Hopkins N, Burgess SM: Zebrafish foxi one modulates cellular responses to Fgf signaling required for the integrity of ear and jaw patterning. Development. 2003, 130 (11): 2543-2554. 10.1242/dev.00455.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Crump JG, Swartz ME, Kimmel CB: An integrin-dependent role of pouch endoderm in hyoid cartilage development. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2 (9): E244-10.1371/journal.pbio.0020244.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Clouthier DE, Hosoda K, Richardson JA, Williams SC, Yanagisawa H, Kuwaki T, Kumada M, Hammer RE, Yanagisawa M: Cranial and cardiac neural crest defects in endothelin-A receptor-deficient mice. Development. 1998, 125 (5): 813-824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Clouthier DE, Williams SC, Yanagisawa H, Wieduwilt M, Richardson JA, Yanagisawa M: Signaling pathways crucial for craniofacial development revealed by endothelin-A receptor-deficient mice. Dev Biol. 2000, 217 (1): 10-24. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9527.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ivey K, Tyson B, Ukidwe P, McFadden DG, Levi G, Olson EN, Srivastava D, Wilkie TM: Galphaq and Galpha11 proteins mediate endothelin-1 signaling in neural crest-derived pharyngeal arch mesenchyme. Dev Biol. 2003, 255 (2): 230-237. 10.1016/S0012-1606(02)00097-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller CT, Yelon D, Stainier DY, Kimmel CB: Two endothelin 1 effectors, hand2 and bapx1, pattern ventral pharyngeal cartilage and the jaw joint. Development. 2003, 130 (7): 1353-1365. 10.1242/dev.00339.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomas T, Kurihara H, Yamagishi H, Kurihara Y, Yazaki Y, Olson EN, Srivastava D: A signaling cascade involving endothelin-1, dHAND and msx1 regulates development of neural-crest-derived branchial arch mesenchyme. Development. 1998, 125 (16): 3005-3014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Piotrowski T, Ahn DG, Schilling TF, Nair S, Ruvinsky I, Geisler R, Rauch GJ, Haffter P, Zon LI, Zhou Y, Foott H, Dawid IB, Ho RK: The zebrafish van gogh mutation disrupts tbx1, which is involved in the DiGeorge deletion syndrome in humans. Development. 2003, 130 (20): 5043-5052. 10.1242/dev.00704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ataliotis P, Ivins S, Mohun TJ, Scambler PJ: XTbx1 is a transcriptional activator involved in head and pharyngeal arch development in Xenopus laevis. Dev Dyn. 2005, 232 (4): 979-991. 10.1002/dvdy.20276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jerome LA, Papaioannou VE: DiGeorge syndrome phenotype in mice mutant for the T-box gene, Tbx1. Nat Genet. 2001, 27 (3): 286-291. 10.1038/85845.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindsay EA, Vitelli F, Su H, Morishima M, Huynh T, Pramparo T, Jurecic V, Ogunrinu G, Sutherland HF, Scambler PJ, Bradley A, Baldini A: Tbx1 haploinsufficieny in the DiGeorge syndrome region causes aortic arch defects in mice. Nature. 2001, 410 (6824): 97-101. 10.1038/35065105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Merscher S, Funke B, Epstein JA, Heyer J, Puech A, Lu MM, Xavier RJ, Demay MB, Russell RG, Factor S, Tokooya K, Jore BS, Lopez M, Pandita RK, Lia M, Carrion D, Xu H, Schorle H, Kobler JB, Scambler P, Wynshaw-Boris A, Skoultchi AI, Morrow BE, Kucherlapati R: TBX1 is responsible for cardiovascular defects in velo-cardio-facial/DiGeorge syndrome. Cell. 2001, 104 (4): 619-629. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00247-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Moraes F, Novoa A, Jerome-Majewska LA, Papaioannou VE, Mallo M: Tbx1 is required for proper neural crest migration and to stabilize spatial patterns during middle and inner ear development. Mech Dev. 2005, 122 (2): 199-212. 10.1016/j.mod.2004.10.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ozeki H, Kurihara Y, Tonami K, Watatani S, Kurihara H: Endothelin-1 regulates the dorsoventral branchial arch patterning in mice. Mech Dev. 2004, 121 (4): 387-395. 10.1016/j.mod.2004.02.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Walker AR, Davison PA, Bolognesi-Winfield AC, James CM, Srinivasan N, Blundell TL, Esch JJ, Marks MD, Gray JC: The TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 locus, which regulates trichome differentiation and anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis, encodes a WD40 repeat protein. Plant Cell. 1999, 11 (7): 1337-1350. 10.1105/tpc.11.7.1337.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. de Vetten N, Quattrocchio F, Mol J, Koes R: The an11 locus controlling flower pigmentation in petunia encodes a novel WD-repeat protein conserved in yeast, plants, and animals. Genes Dev. 1997, 11 (11): 1422-1434.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Skurat AV, Dietrich AD: Phosphorylation of Ser640 in muscle glycogen synthase by DYRK family protein kinases. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (4): 2490-2498. 10.1074/jbc.M301769200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Fotaki V, Dierssen M, Alcantara S, Martinez S, Marti E, Casas C, Visa J, Soriano E, Estivill X, Arbones ML: Dyrk1A haploinsufficiency affects viability and causes developmental delay and abnormal brain morphology in mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2002, 22 (18): 6636-6647. 10.1128/MCB.22.18.6636-6647.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Martinez de Lagran M, Altafaj X, Gallego X, Marti E, Estivill X, Sahun I, Fillat C, Dierssen M: Motor phenotypic alterations in TgDyrk1a transgenic mice implicate DYRK1A in Down syndrome motor dysfunction. Neurobiol Dis. 2004, 15 (1): 132-142. 10.1016/j.nbd.2003.10.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Altafaj X, Dierssen M, Baamonde C, Marti E, Visa J, Guimera J, Oset M, Gonzalez JR, Florez J, Fillat C, Estivill X: Neurodevelopmental delay, motor abnormalities and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice overexpressing Dyrk1A (minibrain), a murine model of Down's syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2001, 10 (18): 1915-1923. 10.1093/hmg/10.18.1915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Deng X, Ewton DZ, Pawlikowski B, Maimone M, Friedman E: Mirk/dyrk1B is a Rho-induced kinase active in skeletal muscle differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278 (42): 41347-41354. 10.1074/jbc.M306780200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Quintin S, Mains PE, Zinke A, Hyman AA: The mbk-2 kinase is required for inactivation of MEI-1/katanin in the one-cell Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4 (12): 1175-1181. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400029.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mercer SE, Ewton DZ, Deng X, Lim S, Mazur TR, Friedman E: Mirk/Dyrk1B Mediates Survival during the Differentiation of C2C12 Myoblasts. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (27): 25788-25801. 10.1074/jbc.M413594200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. The Hopkins Lab Insertional Mutant Collection. http://web.mit.edu/ccr/pnas_zebrafish_mutant_images/index.html.Google Scholar
  38. Popperl H, Rikhof H, Chang H, Haffter P, Kimmel CB, Moens CB: lazarus is a novel pbx gene that globally mediates hox gene function in zebrafish. Mol Cell. 2000, 6 (2): 255-267. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00027-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Bi W, Deng JM, Zhang Z, Behringer RR, de Crombrugghe B: Sox9 is required for cartilage formation. Nat Genet. 1999, 22 (1): 85-89. 10.1038/8792.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Yan YL, Miller CT, Nissen RM, Singer A, Liu D, Kirn A, Draper B, Willoughby J, Morcos PA, Amsterdam A, Chung BC, Westerfield M, Haffter P, Hopkins N, Kimmel C, Postlethwait JH: A zebrafish sox9 gene required for cartilage morphogenesis. Development. 2002, 129 (21): 5065-5079.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schlombs K, Wagner T, Scheel J: Site-1 protease is required for cartilage development in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100 (24): 14024-14029. 10.1073/pnas.2331794100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Topczewski J, Sepich DS, Myers DC, Walker C, Amores A, Lele Z, Hammerschmidt M, Postlethwait J, Solnica-Krezel L: The zebrafish glypican knypek controls cell polarity during gastrulation movements of convergent extension. Dev Cell. 2001, 1 (2): 251-264. 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00005-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller CT, Kimmel CB: Morpholino phenocopies of endothelin 1 (sucker) and other anterior arch class mutations. Genesis. 2001, 30 (3): 186-187. 10.1002/gene.1061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Piotrowski T, Nusslein-Volhard C: The endoderm plays an important role in patterning the segmented pharyngeal region in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Dev Biol. 2000, 225 (2): 339-356. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9842.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Amsterdam A, Burgess S, Golling G, Chen W, Sun Z, Townsend K, Farrington S, Haldi M, Hopkins N: A large-scale insertional mutagenesis screen in zebrafish. Genes Dev. 1999, 13 (20): 2713-2724. 10.1101/gad.13.20.2713.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Gendron-Maguire M, Mallo M, Zhang M, Gridley T: Hoxa-2 mutant mice exhibit homeotic transformation of skeletal elements derived from cranial neural crest. Cell. 1993, 75 (7): 1317-1331. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90619-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Alexandre D, Clarke JD, Oxtoby E, Yan YL, Jowett T, Holder N: Ectopic expression of Hoxa-1 in the zebrafish alters the fate of the mandibular arch neural crest and phenocopies a retinoic acid-induced phenotype. Development. 1996, 122 (3): 735-746.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Couly G, Grapin-Botton A, Coltey P, Ruhin B, Le Douarin NM: Determination of the identity of the derivatives of the cephalic neural crest: incompatibility between Hox gene expression and lower jaw development. Development. 1998, 125 (17): 3445-3459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pasqualetti M, Ori M, Nardi I, Rijli FM: Ectopic Hoxa2 induction after neural crest migration results in homeosis of jaw elements in Xenopus. Development. 2000, 127 (24): 5367-5378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Trainor PA, Ariza-McNaughton L, Krumlauf R: Role of the isthmus and FGFs in resolving the paradox of neural crest plasticity and prepatterning. Science. 2002, 295 (5558): 1288-1291. 10.1126/science.1064540.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller CT, Maves L, Kimmel CB: moz regulates Hox expression and pharyngeal segmental identity in zebrafish. Development. 2004, 131 (10): 2443-2461. 10.1242/dev.01134.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Becker W, Weber Y, Wetzel K, Eirmbter K, Tejedor FJ, Joost HG: Sequence characteristics, subcellular localization, and substrate specificity of DYRK-related kinases, a novel family of dual specificity protein kinases. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273 (40): 25893-25902. 10.1074/jbc.273.40.25893.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Campbell RE, Tour O, Palmer AE, Steinbach PA, Baird GS, Zacharias DA, Tsien RY: A monomeric red fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002, 99 (12): 7877-7882. 10.1073/pnas.082243699.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25 (17): 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22 (22): 4673-4680.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Kimmel CB, Miller CT, Moens CB: Specification and morphogenesis of the zebrafish larval head skeleton. Dev Biol. 2001, 233 (2): 239-257. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Fischle W, Wang Y, Jacobs SA, Kim Y, Allis CD, Khorasanizadeh S: Molecular basis for the discrimination of repressive methyl-lysine marks in histone H3 by Polycomb and HP1 chromodomains. Genes Dev. 2003, 17 (15): 1870-1881. 10.1101/gad.1110503.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Dichtl B, Aasland R, Keller W: Functions for S. cerevisiae Swd2p in 3' end formation of specific mRNAs and snoRNAs and global histone 3 lysine 4 methylation. Rna. 2004, 10 (6): 965-977. 10.1261/rna.7090104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Cheng H, He X, Moore C: The essential WD repeat protein Swd2 has dual functions in RNA polymerase II transcription termination and lysine 4 methylation of histone H3. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24 (7): 2932-2943. 10.1128/MCB.24.7.2932-2943.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Roguev A, Schaft D, Shevchenko A, Pijnappel WW, Wilm M, Aasland R, Stewart AF: The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Set1 complex includes an Ash2 homologue and methylates histone 3 lysine 4. Embo J. 2001, 20 (24): 7137-7148. 10.1093/emboj/20.24.7137.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Tejedor F, Zhu XR, Kaltenbach E, Ackermann A, Baumann A, Canal I, Heisenberg M, Fischbach KF, Pongs O: minibrain: a new protein kinase family involved in postembryonic neurogenesis in Drosophila. Neuron. 1995, 14 (2): 287-301. 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90286-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Hammerle B, Carnicero A, Elizalde C, Ceron J, Martinez S, Tejedor FJ: Expression patterns and subcellular localization of the Down syndrome candidate protein MNB/DYRK1A suggest a role in late neuronal differentiation. Eur J Neurosci. 2003, 17 (11): 2277-2286. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02665.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A, Bader GD, Moore L, Adams SL, Millar A, Taylor P, Bennett K, Boutilier K, Yang L, Wolting C, Donaldson I, Schandorff S, Shewnarane J, Vo M, Taggart J, Goudreault M, Muskat B, Alfarano C, Dewar D, Lin Z, Michalickova K, Willems AR, Sassi H, Nielsen PA, Rasmussen KJ, Andersen JR, Johansen LE, Hansen LH, Jespersen H, Podtelejnikov A, Nielsen E, Crawford J, Poulsen V, Sorensen BD, Matthiesen J, Hendrickson RC, Gleeson F, Pawson T, Moran MF, Durocher D, Mann M, Hogue CW, Figeys D, Tyers M: Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature. 2002, 415 (6868): 180-183. 10.1038/415180a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Garrett S, Broach J: Loss of Ras activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is suppressed by disruptions of a new kinase gene, YAKI, whose product may act downstream of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Genes Dev. 1989, 3 (9): 1336-1348.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang Z, Smith MM, Mymryk JS: Interaction of the E1A oncoprotein with Yak1p, a novel regulator of yeast pseudohyphal differentiation, and related mammalian kinases. Mol Biol Cell. 2001, 12 (3): 699-710.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Schmelzle T, Beck T, Martin DE, Hall MN: Activation of the RAS/cyclic AMP pathway suppresses a TOR deficiency in yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24 (1): 338-351. 10.1128/MCB.24.1.338-351.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Angelo S, Lohr J, Lee KH, Ticho BS, Breitbart RE, Hill S, Yost HJ, Srivastava D: Conservation of sequence and expression of xenopus and zebrafish dHAND during cardiac, branchial arch and lateral mesoderm development [In Process Citation]. Mech Dev. 2000, 95 (1-2): 231-237. 10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00334-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Akimenko MA, Ekker M, Wegner J, Lin W, Westerfield M: Combinatorial expression of three zebrafish genes related to distal- less: part of a homeobox gene code for the head. J Neurosci. 1994, 14 (6): 3475-3486.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nissen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement