Open Access

Molecular markers to characterize the hermaphroditic reproductive system of the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea

BMC Developmental Biology201111:69

DOI: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-69

Received: 20 August 2011

Accepted: 10 November 2011

Published: 10 November 2011

Abstract

Background

The freshwater planarian Schmidtea mediterranea exhibits two distinct reproductive modes. Individuals of the sexual strain are cross-fertilizing hermaphrodites with reproductive organs that develop post-embryonically. By contrast, individuals of the asexual strain reproduce exclusively by transverse fission and fail to develop reproductive organs. These different reproductive strains are associated with distinct karyotypes, making S. mediterranea a useful model for studying germline development and sexual differentiation.

Results

To identify genes expressed differentially between these strains, we performed microarray analyses and identified >800 genes that were upregulated in the sexual planarian. From these, we characterized 24 genes by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), revealing their expression in male germ cells or accessory reproductive organs. To identify additional markers of the planarian reproductive system, we also used immuno- and fluorescent lectin staining, identifying several antibodies and lectins that labeled structures associated with reproductive organs.

Conclusions

Collectively, these cell-type specific markers will enable future efforts to characterize genes that are important for reproductive development in the planarian.

Background

While the planarian has re-emerged as an animal model for studying regeneration and stem cell biology [15], recent studies of Schmidtea mediterranea have also contributed to understanding germ cell biology and sexual development [69]. Two modes of specifying germ cells have evolved among animals, involving either localized determinants or inductive signaling [1012]. Sexual planarians have a reproductive system that can be regenerated de novo from stem cells after amputation [9, 13], suggesting that they specify their germline inductively like mammals and many basal metazoans [10, 14, 15].

S. mediterranea is a powerful model for understanding germ cell development due, in part, to the existence of distinct sexual and asexual strains that allow identification and characterization of genes involved in the different modes of reproduction. The reproductive system of the hermaphrodite consists of the male and female gonads, as well as accessory reproductive organs [7]. Numerous testes are distributed dorsolaterally along the animal, and a pair of ovaries is situated more ventrally at the posterior region of the cephalic ganglia (brain). Ciliated oviducts and sperm ducts running along the nerve cords lead to the copulatory apparatus, comprised of the gonopore (gn), seminal vesicles (sv), copulatory bursa (b), bursal canal (bc), penis papilla (pp) and various glands (g) (Figure 1A) [7]. In each planarian testis lobe, spermatogenesis proceeds from the periphery to the lumen. Spermatogonia undergo three mitotic divisions with incomplete cytokinesis to produce eight primary spermatocytes that enter meiosis, differentiate into 32 spermatids, and mature into spermatozoa (Figure 1B) [16]. The sperm are released into the sperm ducts that funnel sperm to the seminal vesicles. When S. mediterranea mate, sperm from one animal is transferred to its partner and deposited via the bursal canal into the copulatory bursa. The sperm then travel back down the bursal canal into the oviducts and collect in the tuba, an enlarged portion of the oviducts just outside the ovaries (Figure 1A) [17, 18]. As mature oocytes leave the ovary, they are fertilized by sperm stored in the tuba. The fertilized eggs then make their way down the oviduct, and yolk cells are added to the outside of the egg by the vitelline (yolk) glands that line the oviduct. Several embryos and yolk cells are packaged into a single egg capsule. The glands around the genital atrium are involved in the synthesis and deposition of egg capsules [18, 19].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-11-69/MediaObjects/12861_2011_Article_664_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

The planarian reproductive system. (A) Diagram depicting the generalized reproductive system in sexual S. mediterranea. Right, enlarged view of the copulatory apparatus. Bursa (b); bursal canal (bc); seminal vesicles (sv); sperm ducts (sd); oviducts (od); glands (g); gonopore (gn); penis papilla (pp). (B) Schematized view of different germ cell types in the planarian testes.

In contrast to the sexual strain, the asexual strain of S. mediterranea does not develop reproductive organs, and reproduces exclusively by transverse fission. While asexual planarians do not elaborate well-developed gonads, they do possess primordial germ cells that fail to differentiate further [8, 9, 20, 21]. Although the asexual strain is distinguished by a chromosomal translocation, the exact mechanisms that account for the two divergent modes of reproduction are unknown [22, 23]. However, neuropeptide signaling was recently shown to be required for the development of reproductive organs in sexual planarians. RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown of a single neuropeptide gene, npy-8 [GenBank: BK007010], resulted in animals that failed to develop or maintain reproductive organs. Interestingly, npy-8 mRNA was not detected in asexual planarians [6].

The existence of two divergent modes of reproduction in a single species presents a unique opportunity to identify conserved and species-specific genes that are important for germ cell development and reproductive maturation. Thus, we used two approaches to characterize differences between these strains: (i) microarray analysis to identify genes that are expressed differentially between sexual and asexual planarians, followed by in situ hybridization to identify the cell types in which these genes are expressed; and (ii) morphological analysis using confocal microscopy to identify cell type-specific markers that label components of the sexual reproductive system. We show that several genes identified through this transcriptional comparison serve as useful markers for somatic and germ cells of the planarian reproductive system. We also introduce several antibodies and fluorescent lectin-conjugates that will be useful for visualizing components of the planarian reproductive system. These studies provide complementary approaches for studying the genetic and morphological differences between sexual and asexual modes of reproduction in planarians.

Results and Discussion

Identification of genes with significantly higher expression in sexual planarians

To compare gene expression profiles of sexual and asexual planarians and to identify genes involved in sexual development we performed microarray analysis using custom oligonucleotide arrays with probes representing 16,786 unique S. mediterranea transcripts. Analysis of transcriptional profiles from sexual and asexual planarians revealed 951 genes with differential expression greater than 2 standard deviations (approximately 9.7-fold difference) from the mean. We applied this stringent cut-off to enrich for the most differentially expressed genes that would potentially serve as markers of mature reproductive tissues. Of these differentially expressed genes, 822 were expressed at higher levels in sexual animals and 129 were expressed at higher levels in asexual animals (Figure 2). To assign putative functions to genes upregulated in sexual animals, we searched for conserved domains and performed Cluster of Orthologous Group (COG) analyses [24]. For the genes upregulated in sexual animals, these analyses identified 346 of 822 (42%) genes with putative roles in diverse processes; the remaining 476 genes were novel, with no obvious conserved domains. Of the genes with conserved functions, the greatest number could be assigned to the functional categories cytoskeleton, signal transduction, and cell cycle control/cell division/chromosome partitioning. Additionally, our analyses found upregulated genes that shared homology to proteins of unknown function in other organisms (Additional file 1, Table S1). Functional studies of these conserved genes in planarians should provide insight into the roles of these genes in reproductive processes. For the genes upregulated in asexual animals, putative functional categories were assigned to only 14 of 129 genes (11%) using COG analyses (Additional file 2, Table S2); the remaining 115 genes (89%) were novel. Further examination of these genes should shed light on the mechanisms of asexual reproduction in planarians.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-11-69/MediaObjects/12861_2011_Article_664_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Transcriptional analysis of sexual versus asexual planarians. Ratio-intensity (R-I) scatter plot depicting the results of oligonucleotide microarray comparing gene expression between mature sexual planarians (Sx) and asexual (Asex) planarians. Standard deviation (SD); in situ hybridization (ISH); transcripts that showed upregulation (≥ 2 SD) in sexuals (black triangles); transcripts that showed upregulation (≥ 2 SD) in asexuals (yellow triangles); transcripts from primary in situ hybridization screen that were expressed in the planarian reproductive system (green circles); transcripts characterized in this study (purple squares); transcripts showing changes ≤ 2 SD (white squares).

Genes that are upregulated in sexual planarians are expressed in the planarian reproductive system

To validate our microarray results, a primary whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) screen involving 122 genes that showed significant differential expression in the sexual planarians (upregulated ≥ 2 standard deviations from the mean) was performed on mature sexual animals. We focused on genes from four different COG functional categories: signal transduction, transcription, cytoskeleton, and genes of unknown function. Of the 122 genes examined, 100 (82%) were expressed in the reproductive system: 96 genes were expressed in the testes, and 4 genes were expressed in accessory reproductive organs (data not shown). To characterize further the cellular distribution of several of the transcripts, 24 that were expressed either in accessory reproductive organs or during different stages of spermatogenesis were analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (Additional file 3, Figure S1 and Additional file 4, Table S3).

Transcripts of two genes were detected in accessory reproductive organs. A gene similar to granulin (Smed-grn [GenBank: DN304193.1]; for brevity, we will drop the prefix "Smed" from the remaining genes described here) was expressed in a subset of cells forming the sperm ducts and seminal vesicles, components of the "male" reproductive system (Figure 3A and Table 1). The second gene, sharing homology with tetraspanin genes (tsp-1 [GenBank: DN305069.1]), was expressed in glands around the atrium, a "female" structure often associated with egg capsule production. The glands span from the dorsal to the ventral surface of the animal and are interspersed between the testis lobules close to the copulatory apparatus (Figure 3B and Table 1). Simultaneous labeling by two-color FISH showed that grn and tsp-1 were expressed in distinct populations of cells, confirming that some genes are expressed specifically in either male or female reproductive structures (Figure 3C).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-11-69/MediaObjects/12861_2011_Article_664_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

grn and tsp-1 are expressed in accessory reproductive organs. (A-C, top panel) Whole mount view of two-color FISH showing expression of grn (green) and tsp-1 (magenta) in sexual S. mediterranea. Anterior of animal is to the left. (A-C, middle and bottom panels) Single confocal optical sections showing expression of grn (green) and/or tsp-1 (magenta). Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (grey). (A) grn is expressed in the seminal vesicles and sperm ducts. (B) tsp-1 is expressed in glands around the copulatory bursa and bursal canal. The tsp-1-expressing cells are interspersed between testis lobules near the copulatory apparatus. (C) Two-color FISH showing distinct populations of cells expressing either grn or tsp-1. Sperm duct (sd); seminal vesicles (sv); bursa (b); bursal canal (bc); testes (t). Scale bars: (A-C, top panel) 500 μm; (A-C, middle and bottom panels) 100 μm.

Table 1

Genes identified through the sexual/asexual array are expressed in accessory reproductive organs or enriched in different stages of germ cell development in the testes.

Gene

Accessory reproductive organs

Testes

 

Sperm duct/seminal vesicles

Glands around copulatory apparatus

Spermatogonia

Spermatocytes

Spermatids

grn

+

    

tsp-1

 

+

   

msy4

  

+

+

+

thmg-1

  

+

+

+

pde

  

+

+

+

plastin

  

+

+

+

tkn-2

  

+

+

+

tkn-1

   

+

 

tplh

   

+

+

pp2

    

+

pka

    

+

We also used FISH to determine the cell types in which testes-specific genes were expressed (Table 1). This analysis found transcripts expressed broadly throughout the testes; for example, transcripts for four genes (msy4 [GenBank: BK007100], thmg-1 [GenBank: DN307831.1], pde [GenBank: HO008078.1, DN313728.1], and plastin [GenBank: HO007660.1, DN311193.1]) were detected in all male germ cell stages except fully mature spermatozoa (Figure 4A-D). MSY4, a Y-box containing protein is expressed in the male germ cells of mice [25][GenBank: AF246224.1] and the planarian Dugesia etrusca [26][GenBank: AJ439094.1]; knockdown of msy4 has been shown to disrupt spermatid elongation in S. mediterranea [8]. This result validates this approach for identifying genes expressed in planarian germ cells. Furthermore, some transcripts were more abundantly expressed in different cell populations, such as spermatocytes (tkn-1 [GenBank: HO007229.1, DN309082.1], Figure 4E), in spermatocytes and spermatids (tplh [GenBank: HO005509.1, DN311232.1], Figure 4F), or in more differentiated germ cells in the luminal region that likely correspond to spermatids (pp2 [GenBank: HO006984.1, DN315773.1], Figure 4G and pka [GenBank: HO007035.1, DN316100.1], Figure 4H).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-11-69/MediaObjects/12861_2011_Article_664_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Genes upregulated in the sexual planarian that are expressed in the testes. (A-H) Single confocal sections showing FISH for genes (green) expressed in the testes. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (grey). (A-D) msy4, thmg-1, pde, and plastin transcripts are expressed in all germ cell types in the testes except mature sperm. (E) tkn-1 transcripts are enriched in spermatocytes. (F) tplh transcripts are enriched in spermatocytes and spermatids. (G and H) pp2 and pka transcripts are enriched in spermatids. Scale bar: 40 μm.

To confirm that these genes were enriched in distinct germ cell populations within the testes, we performed two-color FISH. Although transcripts of msy4 and thmg-1 are broadly expressed in differentiating male germ cells, it appeared that msy4 transcripts were enriched in subpopulations of cells lacking thmg-1 expression (Figure 5A, white arrows). We also observed cells located in the outer-most layer of the testes that were lacking both msy4 and thmg-1 expression, suggesting that these cells could be the somatic cells of the testes (Figure 5A, boxed inset). While msy4 transcripts were detected in all male germ cell stages, tplh transcripts were enriched in spermatocytes and spermatids (Figure 5B). The spermatocytes expressing tkn-1 transcripts can be distinguished from the more differentiated germ cells that showed pka upregulation (Figure 5C). In contrast to expression of tkn-1 mRNA in the spermatocytes, tkn-2 [GenBank: HO008093.1, DN313931.1] was more broadly expressed in the different germ cell types in the testis (Figure 5D). Tektins are a conserved component of cilia and flagella [27], and our observations indicate that these two tektin paralogs (tkn-1 and 2) are expressed in distinct stages of male germ cell differentiation.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-11-69/MediaObjects/12861_2011_Article_664_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Differential gene expression in distinct populations of male germ cells in the testes. (A-D) Single confocal optical sections showing double FISH of genes (magenta/green) expressed in different populations of male germ cells in the testes. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (grey). A) msy4 and thmg-1 are broadly expressed in differentiating male germ cells. Arrows indicate cells that lack thmg-1 expression. Cells lacking both msy4 and thmg-1 (inset) are likely to be somatic cells associated with the testes. B) msy4 transcripts are detected in all germ cell stages, tplh transcripts are enriched in spermatocytes and spermatids. C) pka transcripts are upregulated in spermatids, tkn-1 transcripts are detected in spermatocytes. D) Tektin paralogs, tkn-1 and tkn-2, are expressed in distinct stages of germ cell differentiation. Scale bar: 40 μm.

Mechanisms regulating different stages of germ cell differentiation are vital for the production of gametes. Based on the assigned putative functions of the genes examined and the enrichment of their mRNA transcripts in different domains of the testes, these genes may be involved in regulating the differentiation of male germ cells. Several studies have shown that germ cells rely upon post-transcriptional regulation to maintain their genomic plasticity [12, 28]. A recent functional genomic screen in S. mediterranea showed that RNA-binding proteins act as critical regulators of germ cell development in planarians [8], similar to germ cell regulation across metazoans, in which RNA-binding proteins regulate germ cell proliferation, stem cell maintenance, and sex determination [2932]. For future work on genes upregulated in sexual planarians, it will be important to functionally characterize genes from other COG categories, such as RNA processing and modification, as well as translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis, with emphasis on genes encoding RNA-binding proteins.

The aforementioned screen to identify genes required for germ cell development in planarians [8] used microarrays to investigate changes in gene expression in animals lacking germ cells after nanos [GenBank: EF035555] RNAi. These experiments were designed to identify differences in the "early" germ cell populations found in asexual planarians and juvenile sexual planarians (i.e., well before reproductive maturity); however, they would not detect genes expressed in the latest stages of reproductive maturation. By contrast, the experiments reported here to compare asexual and fully mature sexual planarians should detect genes expressed in the accessory reproductive organs and/or during the latest stages of reproductive system development. The nanos knockdown experiments identified 103 genes that were downregulated after nanos (RNAi) in asexual planarians and 275 genes that were downregulated after nanos (RNAi) in juvenile sexual planarians [8]; whereas, we found >800 genes that were dramatically upregulated in mature sexual planarians relative to asexuals. Given the large number of reproductive organs (gonads and the many accessory organs) that are present in mature sexual animals, it is not surprising that there are many more genes expressed differentially and at much greater differential levels than were observed in the nanos RNAi experiments.

Comparing these data sets revealed that 237/275 genes (86%) that were downregulated in juvenile sexual nanos (RNAi) animals (i.e., lacking germ cells) were upregulated (>2 s.d.) in sexual planarians relative to asexuals. Similarly, 88/103 genes (85%) that were downregulated in asexual nanos (RNAi) animals were upregulated (>2 s.d.) in sexual planarians. Of the 13 genes shown to be required for different stages of germ cell development [8] nine were upregulated >2 s.d. and two were upregulated >1 s.d. (>3.12-fold) in sexual planarians. Thus, there was excellent agreement between these different data sets. Because asexual planarians also possess early nanos-expresssing germ cells, it is possible that some of the genes that do not show differential expression between asexual and sexual planarians are expressed in early germ cells. Among the genes characterized here by in situ hybridization, 15/24, including those expressed in the somatic accessory structures were not expressed differentially in nanos (RNAi) versus control sexuals, validating this complementary approach to identify genes involved in planarian sexual development.

Our in situ hybridization analyses did not detect genes whose transcripts were expressed exclusively in the ovaries. The difficulty of isolating ovary-specific genes is most likely based upon the paucity of ovarian tissue relative to the animal as a whole. The two ovaries reside at the base of the cephalic ganglia, whereas the testes are distributed throughout the dorso-lateral margin, along most of the length of the animal. Several other accessory reproductive organs also occupy a much greater portion of the planarian body than do the ovaries. Because these experiments have used RNAs isolated from whole planarians, ovarian RNAs are likely to be under-represented relative to testis-enriched RNAs. Thus, isolation of additional ovary-specific transcripts will require other experimental approaches.

Immunofluorescent and fluorescent lectin-conjugate labeling of the planarian reproductive system

The majority of studies describing the planarian reproductive system have been based on histological sections and electron microscopy. While these studies have been very important in describing the morphology of the reproductive organs, they often require serial sectioning and reconstruction, both of which are technically challenging and time consuming. To characterize the reproductive anatomy in whole-mount sexual planarians, we tested several reagents that could potentially label various components of planarian reproductive organs (Table 2). In addition to commercially available antibodies, a rabbit pre-immune serum that reacts with epitopes in planarian muscle cells (anti-muscle) was also used [33]. Lectins, carbohydrate-binding proteins [34, 35], have been used to label cells or tissues- primarily the secretory cells, their cytoplasmic projections, and terminal pores in asexual planarians [36]. Here, we report four fluorescent lectin-conjugates that label reproductive structures in the sexual planarian.
Table 2

Antibodies and lectins that label accessory reproductive organs and gonads in S. mediterranea.

Antibody

Accessory reproductive organs

Testes

 

Oviduct/tuba

Bursa canal

Glands around the copulatory apparatus

Seminal vesicles

Sperm ducts

Penis papilla

Sperm flagella

Membranes in/around testes

Spermatogonia/spermatocytes/spermatids

Tubulin δ2*

+

   

+

 

+

  

Phosphotyrosine^

+

+

 

+

 

+

   

Muscle (pre-immune serum)^

+

+

 

+

     

Carbonic anhydrase^

+

        

Lectin

         

Peanut agglutinin (PNA)*

 

+

+

     

+

Ricinus communis agglutinin (RCA)*

  

+

      

Erythrina cristagalli lectin (ECL)*

  

+

      

Lens culinaris agglutinin (LCA)*

       

+

 

^ Animals were fixed with methacarn.

* Animals were fixed with formaldehyde.

The oviducts and tuba, accessory reproductive organs that are ciliated and ensheathed by muscle fibers, were labeled by anti-tubulin δ2 (Figure 6A, solid box), anti-muscle, and anti-carbonic anhydrase (Figure 6B). A monoclonal antibody that recognizes phosphorylated tyrosine residues (anti-phosphotyrosine) is a general marker that labels multiple structures in the planarian [37]; this antibody also enables visualization of the oviducts and tuba (Figure 6B). We observed that the oviducts were not smooth, straight tubes; rather, they often bent (Figure 6C, arrows) and occasionally looped (Additional file 5, Figure S2A, left panel). Preliminary experiments to label animals of different sizes and maturity have shown that the oviducts develop as individual fragments that join with one another to form a continuous tube, and that the bends in the tube are sites where the individual fragments meet (Additional file5, Figure S2A, right panel). The oviducts connect to the bursal canal, which also labeled with the anti-muscle (Figure 6D) and anti-phosphotyrosine (Figure 6E) antibodies, as well as the lectin Peanut agglutinin (PNA, Figure 6F, solid box). The glands around the copulatory apparatus were recognized by three lectins: PNA (Figure 6F, dashed box), Erythrina cristagalli lectin (ECL, Figure 6F, bottom right) and Ricinus communis agglutinin (RCA, Figure 6F, bottom left).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-11-69/MediaObjects/12861_2011_Article_664_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Immunofluorescent and lectin labeling of the planarian reproductive system. (A-H) Confocal images of immuno or lectin staining in red/magenta/green, DAPI in grey. A) Oviducts (od) and sperm ducts (sd) are labeled by anti-tubulin δ2 (delta tubulin). B) The tuba and oviducts are labeled by anti-muscle (muscle), anti-phosphotyrosine (p-tyr) and anti-carbonic anhydrase (ca). Oocytes (oo) are found in the ovary anterior to the tuba, sperm (s) collect in the tuba. C) Bends in the oviducts (yellow arrows). D) The bursal canal (bc) connects to the oviducts. E) The bursal canal is also visualized by anti-phosphotyrosine. F) Lectin Peanut agglutinin (PNA) labels the bursal canal and glands around the copulatory apparatus, lectin Ricinus communis agglutinin (RCA) and Erythrina cristagalli lectin (ECL) also label glands around the compulatory apparatus. G) Seminal vesicles containing sperm are suspended in a network of muscle fibers. H) The penis papilla is labeled by anti-phosphotyrosine. Scale bars: (A, C-H) 50 μm; (B) 20 μm.

The male accessory reproductive organs were also labeled by a variety of antibodies and lectins. The ciliated sperm ducts were labeled by anti-tubulin δ2 (Figure 6A, dashed box) while the seminal vesicles, tubular structures suspended in a network of muscle fibers, were visualized with anti-muscle (Figure 6G) and anti-phosphotryosine immunostaining (Additional file 5, Figure S2B). The penis papilla was labeled by anti-phosphotyrosine (Figure 6H) and ECL (Additional file 5, Figure S2C). Finally, the common gonopore could be visualized by staining with muscle antibody (Additional file 5, Figure S2D).

In addition to accessory reproductive organs, we also used immuno and lectin staining to label testes. The antibody specific for tubulin δ2 selectively labeled microtubules in the flagella of sperm, allowing visualization of haploid male germ cells in the process of spermiogenesis; including the growing flagella at the round spermatid stage (Figure 7A, dashed box) and the elongation of spermatids into mature sperm (Figure 7A, solid box). Using this antibody, it was also possible to visualize the flagella of the mature sperm as they travel along the oviducts, bursa and bursal canal (Additional file 5, Figure S2E). Intriguingly, the sperm seem to be clustered with their flagella oriented towards the periphery. Further examination of the sperm as they traverse the ducts will provide clues on how the sperm are transported through the reproductive system. In the testes, lectin PNA staining was distributed in a punctate pattern on the surface of pre-meiotic and post-meiotic germ cells (Figure 7B), while the lectin Lens culinaris agglutinin (LCA) labeled cell membranes in and around the testes (Figure 7C).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-11-69/MediaObjects/12861_2011_Article_664_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Immunofluorescent and lectin labeling of the planarian testes. (A-C) Single confocal optical sections showing either immuno or lectin staining (magenta). Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (grey). (A) Antibody labeling with anti-tubulin δ2 (delta tubulin). Insets show magnified views of flagella (magenta) on round spermatids (dashed box) and sperm (solid box). (B) Peanut agglutinin (PNA) staining in the testes. Top panel shows a confocal section of a testis with labeling of spermatogonial cells (sg), bottom panel shows a more ventral confocal section of the same testis with labeling of spermatids (st). (C) Lens culinaris agglutinin (LCA) labels the membranes in and around the testes. Scale bars: 20 μm.

The markers described thus far allow the labeling of male and female reproductive structures of the planarian. An interesting question in simultaneous hermaphrodites is whether male and female reproductive structures are co-dependent on each other. While some genes function in both male and female developmental pathways, there are two potentially distinct pathways that are responsible for either male or female sexual development. This idea is supported by the fact that it is possible to use RNAi to generate animals devoid of male germ cells [8]. The presence of sex-specific pathways in planarians like S. mediterranea could allow the evolution of simultaneous hermaphrodites into distinct male or female sexes, as seen in more derived flatworm species like the parasitic schistosomes. Interestingly, glands that are labeled with lectins in planarians are also labeled by similar lectins in Schistosoma mansoni females, suggesting a common evolutionary origin for these organs [38]. The ability to visualize both male and female components of the planarian reproductive system with antibodies, lectins, and FISH as shown here will prove useful as we proceed with functional studies to identify genes involved in sexual development to gain insight into the mechanisms responsible for sex-specific development.

Conclusions

Using microarray analyses, we have identified >800 genes that are upregulated in the sexual vs. asexual planarian. A subset of these genes, validated through whole-mount in situ hybridization, provides markers of the planarian reproductive system. Their differential expression in differentiating germ cells will be useful for dissecting the spatial and temporal development of planarian reproductive organs. These transcriptomic data, combined with the ability to simultaneously label both male and female components of the planarian reproductive system through the markers identified in this study, will enable functional studies to dissect pathways and mechanisms that are involved in inductive germ cell specification, as well as sexual differentiation and development.

Methods

Planarian culture

Sexual and asexual S. mediterranea were maintained as previously described [9, 37], and starved at least 1 week before use. For all in situ hydridization, immuno and lectin experiments, sexually mature animals were used.

Sequences for oligonucleotide arrays

Sequences from three S. mediterranea EST libraries (Alvarado et al. 2002, Zayas et al. 2005, unpublished ESTs in NCBI) were obtained from NCBI and assembled into 17,568 unique sequences using a variety of approaches (e.g. BLAST, Sequencher and CAP3, and hand curation). These sequence data were used to generate an oligonucleotide array that was submitted to Roche Nimblegen for probe creation. Of the 17,568 sequences submitted, 628 had no suitable regions for probe creation; 129 shared all their probes with 1 other sequence; 12 shared all their probes with 2+ other sequences; and 357 had suitable sequence available for less than 10 probes. After these considerations, the oligonucleotide array had probes representing 16,786 ESTs. Each gene was represented by 10 probe pairs with a mean length of 60 nucleotides.

RNA extraction and purification

Total RNA was extracted from equivalent weights of asexual and sexual animals using a modified Trizol protocol that included an optional spin after homogenization and isopropanol/high salt solution precipitation (Invitrogen). RNA was treated with RNase-free DNAse (Promega) using standard protocols, purified using an RNeasy Mini Spin kit (Qiagen), and quantified with both a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). The purified RNA samples were sent to Roche Nimblegen for labeling and hybridization to custom oligonucleotide arrays.

Oligonucleotide array data analysis

Expression data were received from Roche Nimblegen Inc. and EST calls were generated using the Robust Multichip Average (RMA) algorithm [39, 40]. Z-scores were calculated to assess differential expression. Microarray data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (Accession number GSE32450).

Riboprobe synthesis and whole-mount in situ hybridization

To generate riboprobes for in situ hybridization, clones from the hermaphroditic S. mediterranea EST Database [41] were used as templates. In vitro transcription reactions with T3 RNA polymerase were performed using standard approaches allowing the incorporation of digoxigenin-12-UTP (Roche), fluorescein-12-UTP (Roche), or dinitrophenol-11-UTP (PerkinElmer). Whole-mount in situ hybridization of mature sexual planarians was performed as previously described [8, 42]. In situ hybridizations were conducted either manually or with the Insitu ProVS (Intavis AG Bioanalytical Instruments). For FISH, following post-hybridization washes and blocking, animals were incubated in anti-digoxigenin peroxidase, (1:1000 [Roche]), anti-FITC peroxidase, (1:1000 [Roche]) and/or anti-dinitrophenol peroxidase, (1:100 [PerkinElmer]) overnight at 4°C. Samples were washed at least 6 times (20 min each), and developed with FITC- or Cy3-Tyramide (PerkinElmer) using the manufacturer's protocol. For double FISH, the peroxidase after the first tyramide development was quenched with 2% H2O2 in PBTX (1× PBS + 0.1% Triton X-100) for 1 hour before subsequent antibody incubation. Samples were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) for imaging.

Whole-mount immunofluorescence and Fluorescent Lectin-Conjugate Staining

Planarians were killed with 2% HCl for 5 minutes on ice and fixed for 2 hours with either methacarn (methanol: chloroform: acetic acid [6:3:1]), or 4% formaldehyde in 1× PBS. Following formaldehyde fixation, animals were bleached in 6% H2O2 in 1× PBS for one or two nights depending on size/pigmentation. For methacarn fixation, animals were incubated in methanol (MeOH) for 1-2 hours before bleaching in 6% H2O2 in MeOH and then rehydrated in a 75, 50, 25% MeOH/PBTX (1× PBS + 0.3% Triton X-100) gradient. For both methacarn and formaldehyde fixed samples, animals were washed twice (five minutes each) with PBTX, and incubated in blocking buffer (0.6% IgG free BSA, 0.45% fish gelatin in PBTX) for 2-4 hours. Primary antibody incubation was performed overnight at 4°C at the following concentrations (dilutions in blocking buffer): carbonic anhydrase II human erythrocytes rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:100 [Chemicon International, AB1828]), phospho-tyrosine mouse monoclonal antibody (1:500 [Cell Signaling Technology, 9411]), anti-tubulin δ2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:200 [Millipore, AB3203]), rabbit pre-immune serum/anti-muscle (1:500 [generated by Francesc Cebrià and Tingxia Guo, [33]]). After at least six one-hour washes in PBTX, animals were incubated in secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit Alexa 568, 1:1000 [Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, A11036]; goat anti-mouse Alexa 488, 1:400 [Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, A11029]) overnight at 4°C. For staining with lectins, samples were incubated overnight at 4°C with FITC- or rhodamine-conjugated lectins (1:500 [Vector Laboratories]) diluted from 2 mg/ml stocks in blocking buffer. All immuno and lectin samples were counterstained with DAPI. Animals were washed several times before they were mounted in Vectashield and flattened for imaging.

Microscopy

Samples were imaged with a Leica M205A stereomicroscope and DFC420 camera, a Zeiss Stereo Lumar V12 and/or a LSM 710 confocal microscope. Confocal microscopy was performed as previously described [6]. Images were processed using either Zen 2008/9 (Carl Zeiss) or Adobe Photoshop CS4 (Adobe).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank James Sikes and Jim Collins for insightful discussion and helpful comments on the manuscript. We also thank Nina Hosmane for the initial work on carbonic anhydrase immunostaining. This work was supported by grants from NIH (R01 HD043403) and NSF (IOS-0744689) to PAN. PAN is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
(2)
Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
(3)
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
(4)
Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine

References

  1. Guo T, Peters AHFM, Newmark PA: A Bruno-like gene is required for stem cell maintenance in planarians. Dev Cell. 2006, 11: 159-69. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.06.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gurley KA, Rink JC, Sánchez Alvarado A: Beta-catenin defines head versus tail identity during planarian regeneration and homeostasis. Science. 2007, 319: 323-327.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Newmark PA, Sánchez Alvarado A: Not your father's planarian: A classic model enters the era of functional genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2002, 3: 210-219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sánchez Alvarado A, Newmark PA, Robb SM, Juste R: The Schmidtea mediterranea database as a molecular resource for studying platyhelminthes, stem cells and regeneration. Development. 2002, 129: 5659-65. 10.1242/dev.00167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wagner DE, Wang IE, Reddien PW: Clonogenic neoblasts are pluripotent adult stem cells that underlie planarian regeneration. Science. 2011, 332: 811-6. 10.1126/science.1203983.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins III JJ, Hou X, Romanova EV, Lambrus BG, Miller CM, Saberi A, Sweedler JV, Newmark PA: Genome-wide analyses reveal a role for peptide hormones in planarian germline development. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8: e1000509-10.1371/journal.pbio.1000509.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Newmark PA, Wang Y, Chong T: Germ cell specification and regeneration in planarians. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2008, 73: 573-81. 10.1101/sqb.2008.73.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang Y, Stary JM, Wilhelm JE, Newmark PA: A functional genomic screen in planarians identifies novel regulators of germ cell development. Genes Dev. 2010, 24: 2081-92. 10.1101/gad.1951010.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang Y, Zayas RM, Guo T, Newmark PA: nanos function is essential for development and regeneration of planarian germ cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007, 104: 5901-5906. 10.1073/pnas.0609708104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Extavour CG, Akam M: Mechanisms of germ cell specification across the metazoans: epigenesis and preformation. Development. 2003, 130: 5869-84. 10.1242/dev.00804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nieuwkoop PD, Sutasurya LA: Primordial germ cells in the chordates. 1979, London: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Seydoux G, Braun RE: Pathway to totipotency: lessons from germ cells. Cell. 2006, 127: 891-904. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Morgan TH: Growth and regeneration in Planaria lugubris. Arch Ent Mech Org. 1902, 13: 179-212.Google Scholar
  14. Juliano C, Wessel G: Versatile germline genes: When are germline cells segregated during animal development?. Science. 2010, 329: 640-1. 10.1126/science.1194037.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Juliano CE, Swartz SZ, Wessel GM: A conserved germline multipotency program. Development. 2010, 137: 4113-26. 10.1242/dev.047969.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Franquinet R, Lender T: Etude ultrastructurale des testicules de Polycelis tenuis et Polycelis nigra (Planaires). Evolution des cellules germinales males avant la spermiogenese. Z Mikrosk Anat Forsch. 1973, 87: 4-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischlschweiger W, Clausnitzer E: Bursa, bursa canal, and female antrum of Dugesia tigrina (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida). Zoomorphology. 1984, 104: 386-395. 10.1007/BF00312189.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hyman L: The Invertebrates, Vol II: Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela. 1951, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, IncGoogle Scholar
  19. Shinn GL: Formation of egg capsules by flatworms (phylum platyhelminthes). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society. 1993, 112: 18-34. 10.2307/3226779.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Handberg-Thorsager M, Saló E: The planarian nanos-like gene Smednos is expressed in germline and eye precursor cells during development and regeneration. Dev Genes Evol. 2007, 217: 403-411. 10.1007/s00427-007-0146-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sato K, Shibata N, Orii H, Amikura R, Sakurai T, Agata K, Kobayashi S, Watanabe K: Identification and origin of the germline stem cells as revealed by the expression of nanos-related gene in planarians. Dev Growth Differ. 2006, 48: 615-628. 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2006.00897.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Baguñà J, Carranza S, Pala M, Ribera C, Giribet G, Arnedo MA, Ribas M, Riutort M: From morphology and karyology to molecules. New methods for taxonomical identification of asexual populations of freshwater planarians. A tribute to Professor Mario Benazzi. Ital J Zool. 1999, 66: 207-214. 10.1080/11250009909356258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Benazzi M, Baguñà J, Ballester R, Puccinelli I, Del Papa R: Further contribution to the taxonomy of the "Dugesia lugubris-polychroa group" with description of Dugesia mediterranea n.sp. (Tricladida, Paludicola). Boll Zool. 1975, 42: 81-89. 10.1080/11250007509430132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, Krylov DM, Mazumder R, Mekhedov SL, Nikolskaya AN, et al: The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003, 4: 41-10.1186/1471-2105-4-41.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Giorgini F, Davies HG, Braun RE: Translational repression by MSY4 inhibits spermatid differentiation in mice. Development. 2002, 129: 3669-79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Salvetti A, Lena A, Rossi L, Deri P, Cecchettini A, Batistoni R, Gremigni V: Characterization of DeY1, a novel Y-box gene specifically expressed in differentiating male germ cells of planarians. Gene Expr Patterns. 2002, 2: 195-200. 10.1016/S1567-133X(02)00063-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Amos LA: The tektin family of microtubule-stabilizing proteins. Genome Biol. 2008, 9: 229-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Leatherman JL, Jongens TA: Transcriptional silencing and translational control: key features of early germline development. Bioessays. 2003, 25: 326-35. 10.1002/bies.10247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kimble J, Crittenden SL: Germline proliferation and its control: WormBook. 2005Google Scholar
  30. Kimble J, Crittenden SL: Controls of germline stem cells, entry into meiosis, and the sperm/oocyte decision in Caenorhabditis elegans. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2007, 23: 405-33. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kimble J, Wickens M, Thompson B: Translational Control in Development. Translational Control in Biology and Medicine. 2007, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 507-534.Google Scholar
  32. Shibata N, Rouhana L, Agata K: Cellular and molecular dissection of pluripotent adult somatic stem cells in planarians. Dev Growth Differ. 52: 27-41.
  33. Forsthoefel DJ, Park AE, Newmark PA: Stem cell-based growth, regeneration, and remodeling of the planarian intestine. Dev Biol. 2011Google Scholar
  34. Sharon N: Lectins: carbohydrate-specific reagents and biological recognition molecules. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 2753-64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharon N, Lis H: History of lectins: from hemagglutinins to biological recognition molecules. Glycobiology. 2004, 14: 53R-62R. 10.1093/glycob/cwh122.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zayas RM, Cebria F, Guo T, Feng J, Newmark PA: The use of lectins as markers for differentiated secretory cells in planarians. Dev Dyn. 2010, 239: 2888-97. 10.1002/dvdy.22427.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Cebrià F, Newmark PA: Planarian homologs of netrin and netrin receptor are required for proper regeneration of the central nervous system and the maintenance of nervous system architecture. Development. 2005, 132: 3691-703. 10.1242/dev.01941.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Collins JJ, King RS, Cogswell A, Williams DL, Newmark PA: An atlas for Schistosoma mansoni organs and life-cycle stages using cell type-specific markers and confocal microscopy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 5: e1009-
  39. Irizarry RA, Bolstad BM, Collin F, Cope LM, Hobbs B, Speed TP: Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: e15-10.1093/nar/gng015.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, Speed TP: Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003, 4: 249-64. 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zayas RM, Hernandez A, Habermann B, Wang Y, Stary JM, Newmark PA: The planarian Schmidtea mediterranea as a model for epigenetic germ cell specification: analysis of ESTs from the hermaphroditic strain. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005, 102: 18491-18496. 10.1073/pnas.0509507102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pearson BJ, Eisenhoffer GT, Gurley KA, Rink JC, Miller DE, Sánchez Alvarado A: Formaldehyde-based whole-mount in situ hybridization method for planarians. Dev Dyn. 2009, 238: 443-50. 10.1002/dvdy.21849.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement