Open Access

A comparative study of prenatal development in Miniopterus schreibersii fuliginosus, Hipposideros armiger and H. pratti

BMC Developmental Biology201010:10

DOI: 10.1186/1471-213X-10-10

Received: 3 March 2009

Accepted: 21 January 2010

Published: 21 January 2010

Abstract

Background

Bats comprise the second largest order of mammals. However, there are far fewer morphological studies of post-implantation embryonic development than early embryonic development in bats.

Results

We studied three species of bats (Miniopterus schreibersii fuliginosus, Hipposideros armiger and H. pratti), representing the two suborders Yangochiroptera and Yinpterochiroptera. Using an established embryonic staging system, we identified the embryonic stages for M. schreibersii fuliginosus, H. armiger and H. pratti and described the morphological changes in each species, including the development of the complex and distinctive nose-leaves in H. armiger and H. pratti. Finally, we compared embryonic and fetal morphology of the three species in the present study with five other species for which information is available.

Conclusion

As a whole, the organogenetic sequence of bat embryos is uniform and the embryos appear homoplastic before Stage 16. Morphological differentiation between species occurs mainly after embryonic Stage 16. Our study provides three new bat species for interspecific comparison of post-implantation embryonic development within the order Chiroptera and detailed data on the development of nose-leaves for bats in the superfamily Rhinolophoidea.

Background

The Chiroptera is the second largest order of mammals with over 1100 species [1]. It consists of two suborders and five superfamilies [2]. Although early development has been described for many bat species [3], post-implantation staging systems have been described for only five species from three superfamilies (Fig. 1) [48]. However, an important superfamily of bats, the Rhinolophoidea, in the suborder Yinpterochiroptera, has not been studied. Bats in this superfamily are characterised by the complex structure of their nose-leaves which are associated with echolocation [9, 10]. In this paper, we applied the staging system developed by Cretekos et al [5] to three bat species, M. schreibersii fuliginosus, H. armiger and H pratti, which belong to the superfamilies Vespertilionoidea and Rhinolophoidea respectively [2], to investigate whether there are any species specific differences in embryonic development.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-10-10/MediaObjects/12861_2009_Article_487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Phylogeny of the eight species of bats studied for embryogenesis. Species studied in this paper are underlined. Yinptero-, Yinpterochiroptera.

M. schreibersii fuliginosus, Schreibers's long-fingered bat, is widespread from the temperate zone to the tropics in the Old World [11, 12]. In the north temperate zone (32.5°N and 33.5°N), copulation and fertilization occur in autumn, and implantation and embryonic development are delayed for the duration of hibernation [13, 14]. Normal embryonic development proceeds after arousal from hibernation in spring and parturition occurs in summer [15].

H. armiger, the great leaf-nosed bat, is widely distributed in subtropical and tropical zones of Asia [12]. At lower latitudes, this species hibernates from December to February [16, 17] and embryonic development is delayed [18].

H. pratti, Pratt's leaf-nosed bat, has been found in a few Asian countries and is distributed across the same latitudes as H. armiger [12]. Although this species was described in 1891 [19], it has been the subject of few studies and none on reproduction or development.

Here we compare morphological changes during embryonic and fetal development for the three bat species, describing the differentiation and development of the face and limbs, and comparing them with information already available for five other bat species. By adding the two hipposiderid species studied in this paper, representatives of another superfamily have been considered (Fig. 1).

Results

Specimen summary

Female M. schreibersii fuliginosus, H. armiger and H. pratti possess bicornuate uteri and are monotocous. H. armiger were in torpor on 19 Feb 2009 and 4 March 2008. On other capture dates, the three species of bats had already aroused. We obtained embryos from 24 M. schreibersii fuliginosus in nine stages of development (Stages 13-18, 20, 23 and the fetal stage), 26 H. armiger in 11 stages (Stages 10, 11, 14, 17-23 and fetal stage) and 12 H. pratti in nine stages (Stages 11, 14-16, 19, 20, 22, 23 and the fetal stage) and three neonates of M. schreibersii fuliginosus. Because they were resected for mRNA extraction, the limbs of a few specimens are missing (Stages 20, 21 of H. armiger and Stages 19, 20, 23 of H. pratti) and some limb information is lacking. Table 1 shows the capture dates of the female bats and the date on which each stage was dissected for each species. All the prenatal stages in this study occurred between April and June. In all gravid M. schreibersii fuliginosus examined, a fetus was present in the right horn of uterus, whereas in all gravid H. armiger and H. pratti it was in the left horn of uterus. The crown rump length (CRL) and uterus diameter (UD) progressively increased during embryonic development (Table 2).
Table 1

Capture and dissection dates of the M. schreibersii fuliginosus , H.armiger and H. pretti.

 

M. schreibersii fuliginosus

H. armiger

H. pratti

Stage

04/24/09

04/28/08

02/19/09

03/04/08

04/24/09

04/28/08

05/22/08

04/24/09

05/22/08

06/04/09

10

    

04/25/09 (2)

     

11

    

04/25/09 (2)

  

04/25/09 (1)

05/05/09 (1)

  

12

          

13

 

04/30/08 (1)

05/02/08 (1)

        

14

 

05/02/08 (1)

05/04/08 (1)

05/06/08 (1)

 

04/25/09 (1)

   

05/02/09 (1)

  

15

 

05/04/08 (2) 05/05/08 (1)

     

05/11/09 (1)

  

16

 

05/03/08 (1)

05/06/08 (2)

05/07/08 (1)

     

05/05/09 (1)

  

17

 

05/03/08 (1) 05/07/08 (2)

  

05/05/09 (1)

     

18

 

05/06/08 (1) 05/14/08 (1)

04/02/09 (2)

04/14/08 (1)

      

19

   

04/18/08 (1)

  

05/22/08 (1)

 

05/22/08 (2)

 

20

 

05/18/08 (1) 05/20/08 (1)

 

04/21/08 (1) 04/22/08 (1)

    

05/22/08 (2)

 

21

     

05/14/08 (2)

    

22

   

04/22/08 (1) 04/26/08 (1)

 

05/14/08 (1)

 

05/22/09 (1)

  

23

 

05/21/08 (1)

 

04/26/08 (1) 04/29/08 (1)

05/14/08 (1)

   

05/22/08 (1)

 

Fetal

05/28/09 (1) 06/23/09 (2)

05/22/08 (1)

04/25/09 (1)

05/13/08 (1)

05/14/08 (1)

05/11/09 (1)

 

05/22/08 (1)

 

06/04/09 (1)

 

Dates are given as month/day/year. Dates in the second line of the table are the capture dates, and other dates are the dissection dates. The number of embryos or fetuses is shown in the brackets.

Table 2

Feature comparisons of eight bat species during embryonic and fetal development.

  

C. perspicillata a

H. armiger b

H. pratti b

R. amplexicaudatus c

Stage

Commen features

Specific features

UD

CRL

Specific features

UD

CRL

Specific features

UD

CRL

Specific features

CRL

10

Neural tube and somite formation

4-12 somite pairs

  

5-12 somite pairs

7.00 ± 1.10 (2)

      

11

Rostral neuropore closure; cranial flexure; 2 pharyngeal arches; optic evagination; otic vesicle

13-20 somite pairs

  

22 somite pairs; cervical flexure

7.42 ± 0.14 (2)

2.42 ± 0.03 (2)

22 somite pairs; cervical flexure

7.17 ± 0.02 (2)

2.69 ± 0.35 (2)

  

12

Forelimb buds form; tail bud forms; caudal neuropore closes; 3 pharyngeal arches

21--29 somite pairs; cervical flexure

5.75 ± 0.64

3.4 ± 0.42

        

13

Oral groove; optic cup; lens placode; hindlimb bud; forelimb AER

30-35 somite pairs

          

14

Retinal pigment; genital tubercle

36-40 somite pairs; small nasal pits; propatagium and plagiopatagium primordia; hindlimb AER

6.95 ± 0.44

5.35 ± 0.24

36 somite pairs; round nasal pits

9.58 (1)

5.14 (1)

40 somite pairs; round nasal pits

8.86 (1)

5.52 (1)

  

15

Lens vesicles; auditory hillocks

Hand and foot plates; external auditory meatus

8.65 ± 1.20

7.45 ± 0.92

   

40 somite pairs; hand plate

11.10 (1)

7.80 (1)

  

16

Naris; pinna

Eyelid primordium; nose-leaf primordium; tragus; vibrissal folicles; forelimb digital condensations; uropatagium primordium

12.06 ± 1.45

8.66 ± 1.05

   

Nose-leaf primordium; external auditory meatus; pinna; antitragus; foot plate

12.90 (1)

9.52 (1)

Vibrissal folicles; antitragus; calcar primordium; forelimb digital condensations; hindlimb interdigit tissue receding

8.5 (2)

17

 

Eyes begin to close; tongue out; chin wart; unicorn bump; hindlimb interdigit tissue receding

13.45 ± 1.34

9.15 ± 1.34

Hindlimb interdigit tissue receding; uropatagium primordium

15.00 (1)

12.38 (1)

   

Hindlimb interdigit tissue receding

9.4 (1)

18

Head and body smoother, rounder

Free thumb; free toes; calcar; flexure at wrist; uropatagium enclose the whole tail

16.32 ± 0.98

12.35 ± 1.16

12 pairs of ribs; eyes begin to close; 1st supplementary leaflet; frontal sac primordium; free thumb; free toes; calcar

17.05 ± 0.43 (3)

13.11 ± 0.44 (3)

   

Oral papillae; free thumb; free toes; claw primordia

13.4 (1)

19

 

Claw primordia

  

2nd supplementary leaflet; flexure at wrist; claw primordia; uropatagium enclose the whole tail

18.98 ± 1.02 (2)

15.66 ± 0.81 (2)

1st supplementary leaflet; vibrissal folicles; uropatagium enclose the whole tail

 

16.79 ± 1.68 (2)

 

16.1 (1)

20

Distal forelimbs overlap over face

Eyelids closed

20.0 ± 3.54

16.35 ± 1.06

Eyelids closed; 3rd supplementary leaflet; vibrissal folicles

20.13 ± 0.71 (2)

18.50 ± 0.32 (2)

Eyelids closed; nose-leaves achieve adult appearance

 

18.95 ± 0.07 (2)

Eyelids closed

16.3-20.7 (5)

21

     

22.52 ± 0.34 (2)

19.39 ± 0.25 (2)

     

22

Wing membranes corrugated

Nose-leaf; eyelids reopening; claws pigmented, hooked

23.03 ± 2.68

20.02 ± 0.26

Claws pigmented, hooked

23.78 ± 1.68 (3)

22.04 ± 0.37 (3)

Claws pigmented, hooked

23.04 (1)

21.44 (1)

Genitals begin dimorphic differentiation

17.2-28.6 (3)

23

     

25.77 ± 0.57 (3)

23.58 ± 0.13 (3)

  

24.86 (1)

  

Fetal

Vibrissae; short hair widespread on dorsal parts

Eyes completely open

23.53 ± 0.64

21.13 ± 0.06

Nose-leaves achieve adult appearance; genitals begin dimorphic differentiation

38.58 ± 6.82 (5)

36.48 ± 5.36 (5)

Genitals begin dimorphic differentiation

34.23 (1)

33.31 (1)

Pigmentation in palpebral line

27.3-44.4 (5)

  

M. schreibersii fuliginosus b

M. natalensis d

P. abramus e

M. rufus f

Stage

Commen features

Specific features

UD

CRL

Specific features

UD

CRL

Specific features

CRL

Specific features

UD

CRL

10

Neural tube and somite formation

      

7 somite pairs

2.3

   

11

Rostral neuropore closure; cranial flexure; 2 pharyngeal arches; optic evagination; otic vesicle

      

10-12 somite pairs; cervical flexure

2.3-2.6

   

12

Forelimb buds form; tail bud forms; caudal neuropore closes; 3 pharyngeal arches

   

27 somite pairs

5.8 ± 0.12 (3)

3.7 ± 0.94 (3)

16-18 somite pairs

2.1-2.2

   

13

Oral groove; optic cup; lens placode; hindlimb bud; forelimb AER

31 somite pairs

6.31 ± 0.38 (2)

4.22 ± 0.11 (2)

 

8.0 ± 2.09 (11)

5.2 ± 0.26 (11)

25-28 somite pairs; hindlimb AER; long nasal pits

2.6-4.1

33-36 somite pairs

5.0 (1)

5.0 (1)

14

Retinal pigment; genital tubercle

42 somite pairs; long nasal pits; propatagium and plagiopatagium primordia; hindlimb AER

8.39 ± 0.48 (3)

5.85 ± 0.49 (3)

Long nasal pits; propatagium and plagiopatagium primordia; hindlimb AER

9.0 ± 1.01 (18)

5.9 ± 0.80 (18)

Hand plate

4.1-5.7

37-40 somite pairs; long nasal pits; propatagium primordia; hindlimb AER

8.0-9.5 (3)

5.8-7.0 (3)

15

Lens vesicles; auditory hillocks

42 somite pairs; 10 pairs of ribs; external auditory meatus; forelimb digital condensations; foot plate

9.92 ± 1.47 (3)

7.19 ± 0.71 (3)

Forelimb digital condensations; foot plate

10.4 ± 0.81 (21)

7.3 ± 0.75 (21)

Plagiopatagium primordium; foot plate

5.9

Plagiopatagium primordia; hand and foot plates

10-10.5 (2)

7.2-9.0 (2)

16

Naris; pinna

Eyelid primordium; tragus; uropatagium primordium

11.27 ± 0.52 (4)

8.28 ± 0.48 (4)

Tragus; hindlimb digital condensations; hindlimb interdigit tissue receding; uropatagium primordium

11.8 ± 0.83 (26)

9.1 ± 0.68 (26)

Tragus; hindlimb interdigit tissue receding

5.6-7.2

Antitragus; vibrissal folicles; uropatagium primordium; fore- and hindlimb digital condensations

10.0-12.0 (2)

9.7-10.0 (2)

17

 

Eyes begin to close; vibrissal folicles; chin wart; hindlimb interdigit tissue receding

12.96 ± 0.78 (3)

9.59 ± 0.54 (3)

Vibrissal folicles

12.2 ± 1.02 (31)

10.5 ± 0.63 (31)

Vibrissal folicles; free thumb; free toes; propatagium

9.1

cervical flexure absent; fore- and hindlimb interdigit tissue receding

11.0 (1)

11.4 (1)

18

Head and body smoother, rounder

Free thumb; free toes; flexure at wrist; calcar

13.88 ± 1.95 (2)

10.48 ± 1.56 (2)

Free thumb

13.0 ± 1.33 (10)

12.0 ± 0.80 (10)

Eyelids closed; claw primordia

10.6-11.2

Eyes begin to close; free thumb; claw primordia

12.0-13.0 (4)

12.0-13.5 (4)

19

 

Claw primordia

  

Claw primordia; calcar

13.1 ± 1.28 (4)

12.8 ± 0.69 (4)

     

20

Distal forelimbs overlap over face

Eyelids closed; tooth primordium; uropatagium enclose the whole tail

17.46 ± 1.12 (2)

14.44 ± 0.82 (2)

Eyelids closed; uropatagium enclose the whole tail

14.3 ± 0.35 (2)

14.4 ± 0.82 (2)

Claws hooked; uropatagium enclose the whole tail

12.7

Eyelids closed

13.5-14.5 (2)

16.7-18.5 (2)

21

    

Claws pigmented, hooked

15.3 (1)

15.7 (1)

   

19.0 (1)

19.0 (1)

22

Wing membranes corrugated

        

Eyelids reopening; teeth formed

19.0 (1)

28.0 (1)

23

 

Genitals begin dimorphic differentiation

18.90 (1)

17.30 (1)

        

Fetal

Vibrissae; short hair widespread on dorsal parts

 

22.99 ± 4.71 (4)

23.09 ± 5.91 (4)

    

17.4

   

UD: uterus diameter (mm); CRL: crown rump length (mm); AER: apical ectodermal ridge. The average UD and CRL are given with standard deviation or the range of measurements. The number of specimens is given in the parenthesis.

a Data from Cretekos et al. [5]; b Data from current study; c Data from Giannini et al. [7]; d Data from Hockman et al. [4]; e Data from Tokita [6]; f Data from Nolte et al. [8].

Embryonic and fetal development of M. schreibersii fuliginosus

Stage 13 (Fig. 2A; Fig. 3A1): 31 pairs of somites were evident early in this stage. The body was curved significantly so that the head touched the tail bud. The cervical flexure was obvious at the junction of the head and trunk. A cleft (oral groove) divided the first pharyngeal arch into the maxilla and the mandible. The second (hyoid) arch was as large as the mandible, whereas the third (glossopharyngeal) arch almost disappeared behind the hyoid. The optic cups, lens placodes, and otic vesicle were clearly visible at the lateral side of the head. The dilated forelimb bud presented an apical ectodermal ridge (AER) at its distal edge. A pair of hindlimb buds began to appear near the tail bud.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-10-10/MediaObjects/12861_2009_Article_487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

M. schreibersii fuliginosus at embryonic Stages 13-17. (A1-6) Stage 13. (B1-6) Stage 14. (C1-6) Stage 15. (D1-6) Stage 16. (E1-6) Stage 17. (A1, B1, C1, D1, E1) Lateral view with dorsal to the right; (A2, B2, C2, D2, E2) Ventral view; (A3, B3, C3, D3, E3) Dorsal view of the head and trunk; (A4, B4, C4, D4, E4) Dorsal view of the trunk and tail; (A5, B5, C5, D5, E5) Close-up for the left forelimb; (A6, B6, C6, D6, E6) Close-up for the left hindlimb. aer, apical ectodermal ridge; ah, auditory hillocks; cvf, cervical flexure; chp, chiropatagium; eam, external auditory meatus; eb, elbow; flb, forelimb bud; hlb, hindlimb bud; kn, knee; lv, lens vesicle; np, nasal pit; og, oral groove; plp, plagiopatagium; pi, pinna; pr, pigmented retina; prp, propatagium; tb, tail bud; tg, tragus; urp, uropatagium. Bar = 1 mm in A4, B4, C4, D4 and E4 (applies to A1-4, B1-4, C1-4, D1-4, E1-4); bar = 200 μm in A5-6, B5-6, C5-6, D5-6 and E5-6.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-10-10/MediaObjects/12861_2009_Article_487_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Craniofacial development of M. schreibersii fuliginosus , H. armiger and H. pratti. (A1-10) M. schreibersii fuliginosus: (A1) Lateral view of left side of Stage 13 head; (A2-10) Face-on views of Stage 14 (A2), Stage 15 (A3), Stage 16 (A4), Stage 17 (A5), Stage 18 (A6), Stage 20 (A7), Stage 23 (A8), fetal stage (A9), and adult (A10) heads. (B1-10) H. armiger: (B1) Lateral view of left side of Stage 11 head; (A2-9) Face-on views of Stage 14 (B2), Stage 17 (B3), Stage 18 (B4), Stage 19 (B5), Stage 20 (B6), Stage 22 (B7), fetal stage (B8), and adult (B9) heads; (B10) A diagram of an adult H. armiger's face illustrating nose-leaves. (C1-10) H. pratti: (C1) Lateral view of left side of Stage 11 head; (C2-9) Face-on views of Stage 14 (C2), Stage 15 (C3), Stage 16 (C4), Stage 19 (C5), Stage 20 (C6), Stage 22 (C7), fetal stage (C8), and adult (C9) heads; (C10) A diagram of an adult H. pratti's face illustrating nose-leaves. ah, auditory hillocks; at, antitragus; cc, chin cleft; el, eyelid; ep, eyelid primordium; fd, fold; ff, the 4th fold; fs, frontal sac; fsp, frontal sac primordium; ga, glossopharyngeal arch; ha, hyoid arch; hr, hair; lp, lens placode; lv, lens vesicle; md, mandible; mx, maxilla; ma, mandibular arch; mnl, main nose-leaf; nl, nose-leaf; nlp, nose-leaf primordium; np, nasal pit; nr, naris; og, oral groove; ope, optic evagination; opc, optic cup; otv, otic vesicle; pi, pinna; pig, pigment; pr, pigmented retina; pt, protuberance; sf, the second fold; sh, shield; tg, tragus; to, tongue; tp, tooth primordium; vf, vibrissal follicles. Bar = 200 μm in A1-5, B1-2 and C1-3; bar = 1 mm in A6-9, B3-8 and C4-8; bar = 2 mm in A10, B9 and C9.

Stage 14 (Fig. 2B; Fig. 3A2): specimens at Stages 14-15 had a maximum of 42 pairs of somites, so that somitogenesis was completed with 42 pairs before Stage 15. The cervical flexure inscribed a right angle. Pigmentation in the retina began and the genital tubercle appeared below the umbilicus. A pair of nasal pits was evident, as a long groove. The primordium of the propatagium and plagiopatagium, which will form part of the wing membrane, appeared at the two sides of the forelimb bud. The shape of the hindlimb bud was very similar to that of the forelimb bud in Stage 13 and its AER emerged.

Stage 15 (Fig. 2C; Fig. 3A3): ribs were visualised by Alcian blue and ten pairs of ribs were evident (Fig. 4A). The body became straighter. The eyes were black and lens vesicles were evident. The external auditory meatus and auditory hillocks replaced a small part of the first pharyngeal arch and the second pharyngeal arch. The lower jaw was clearly visible at the lateral side. Discoid hand plates and foot plates were formed. Digit condensations, which will become the skeleton of the digits, began in the hand plate (Fig. 4A). The primordium of the propatagium and plagiopatagium continued to extend.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-10-10/MediaObjects/12861_2009_Article_487_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Alcian blue staining. (A) M. schreibersii fuliginosus at Stage 15. (B) H. armiger at Stage 18 (limbs removed). Red arrows indicate the ribs and the triangle indicates the left hand plate with digit condensation. Bar = 1 mm.

Stage 16 (Fig. 2D; Fig. 3A4): eyelid primordia and a pair of nares were formed. A muzzle consisting of the nares, upper jaw and the lower jaw was easily recognized. There was an evident cleft in the center of the lower jaw. The auditory hillocks became pinnae and tragi, the former curling inward at the distal tips. Elbows could be recognized as flexures on the forelimbs. The interdigital notches were distinctly present in the hand plate. The primordium of the uropatagium emerged between the legs and the tail.

Stage 17 (Fig. 2E; Fig. 3A5): vibrissal follicles appeared at the two sides of the nose and chin warts were seen on the lower jaw. The eyelids began to cover the eyes. The muzzle extended. The curled pinnae spread out and the tragi enlarged. Knees could be recognized as a flexure on the hindlimb. Tissues between all the digits of the hindlimb and between the first and second digits of the forelimb began to regress, whereas those between other digits of the forelimb remained to form the chiropatagium.

Stage 18 (Fig. 5A; Fig. 3A6): the whole body appeared rounder, because the cervical flexure disappeared and the back of the head became round. Pigmentation appeared on the face and the eyelids almost covered the eyes with only a small opening. A pair of tooth primordia was evident on the lower jaw. The first digit of the forelimb (hallux) was almost free and other digits of the forelimb began to elongate within the chiropatagium. Flexure at the wrist was easily recognized. Tissues between the digits of the foot disappeared and the calcar appeared at the ankle.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-10-10/MediaObjects/12861_2009_Article_487_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

M. schreibersii fuliginosus at embryonic Stages 18-23, the fetal stage and a newborn M. schreibersii fuliginosus. (A1-A6) Stage 18. (B1-B6) Stage 20. (C1-C6) Stage 23. (D1-D6) fetal stage. (E1-E6) newborn. (A1, B1, C1, D1, E1) Lateral view with dorsal to the right; (A2, B2, C2, D2, E2) Ventral view; (A3, B3, C3, D3, E3) Dorsal view of the head and trunk; (A4, B4, C4, D4, E4) Dorsal view of the trunk and tail; (A5, B5, C5, D5, E5) Close-up for the left forelimb; (A6, B6, C6, D6, E6) Close-up for the left hindlimb. a, autopod; cc, calcar; cl, claw; cp, claw primordium; s, stylopod; tm, thumb; tt, tooth; urp, uropatagium; z, zeugopod. Bar = 1 mm in A4, B4, C4, D4, E4 (applies to A1-4, B1-4, C1-4, D1-4, E1-4), A5-6, B5-6, C5-6, D5-6 and E5-6.

Stage 20 (Fig. 5B; Fig. 3A7): the eyes were completely closed at the beginning of this stage. The main features of the craniofacial morphology had achieved an adult appearance (Fig. 3A10). Claw primordia were not seen at Stage 18, but were enlarged at Stage 20, suggesting their presence at Stage 19. The pinna grew large and straight. The hands with chiropatagia were enlarged, nearly covering the entire face and overlapping at the anterior edges. The feet overlapped each other. The uropatagium enclosed the whole tail and extended to the ankle.

Stage 23 (Fig. 5C; 3A8): 2 hair follicles were visible on each upper eyelid. The genital tubercle had become a vagina or a penis so gender could be distinguished. The chiropatagium, plagiopatagium and uropatagium became slack and thin as they increased in area. In the forelimb, the autopod was a little longer than the stylopod and zeugopod (a = 8.95 mm; z = 8.21 mm; s = 8.03 mm).

Fetal stage (Fig. 5D; Fig. 3A9): pigmentation around the nares and on the claw became fuscous and the pigmentation of the entire body surface increased as fetal development progressed.

Neonates (Fig. 5E): 3 M. schreibersii fuliginosus were born in the captive colony on July 5, 7 and 17, with eyelids closed. Their mean body weight was 3.22 ± 0.12 g and their mean forearm length was 16.26 ± 0.05 mm. The skin was faintly red in colour. Short and dense whiskers and vibrissae were present around the mouth and on the cheeks. Two long hairs projected from each upper eyelid. Exiguous hairs were also found on the legs, elbows, digits of the hindlimbs and the first digit of the forelimb. Very small teeth were present and the tongue was obvious. Claws on the digits of the hindlimbs and the first digit of the forelimb had been keratinized and were sufficiently aculeate to allow the neonate to attach to the mother.

Embryonic and fetal development of H. armiger

Stage 10 (Fig. 6A, B): Two specimens with five and 12 somites were obtained at this stage. The neural fold was open at the anterior region in the five-somite embryo. It then fused to form the neural tube. At the end of this stage, the neural tube was clearly seen from the dorsal view of the twelve-somite embryo.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-10-10/MediaObjects/12861_2009_Article_487_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

H. armiger at embryonic Stages 10-18. (A) Dorsal view of a five-somite embryo at Stage 10. (B) Dorsal view of a twelve-somite embryo at Stage 10. (C1-4) Stage 11. (D1-6) Stage 14. (E1-6) Stage 17. (F1-6) Stage 18. (C1, D1, E1, F1) Lateral view with dorsal to the right; (C2, D2, E2, F2) Ventral view; (C3, D3, E3, F3) Dorsal view of the head and trunk; (C4, D4, E4, F4) Dorsal view of the trunk and tail; (D5, E5, F5) Close-up for the left forelimb; (D6, E6, F6) Close-up for the left hindlimb. al, allantois; cc, calcar; chp, chiropatagium; crf, cranial flexure; cvf, cervical flexure; h, heart; hp, head process; nf, neural fold; np, nasal pit; nt, neural tube; plp, plagiopatagium; pr, pigmented retina; prp, propatagium; so, somite; tm, thumb; urp, uropatagium. Bar = 1 mm in B, C4, D4, E4, F4 (applies to C1-4, D1-4, E1-4, F1-4), E5-6 and F5-6; bar = 500 μm in A and D5-6.

Stage 11 (Fig. 6C; Fig. 3B1): had 22 pairs of somites. The embryo curved strongly to make a round body shape. The caudal region with a spherical allantois flexed to the right side of the head. The rostral neuropore was closed and the cranial and cervical flexures became apparent. Optic invaginations which would become optic cups were at the lateral side of the forebrain. The first two pharyngeal arches (mandibular and hyoid) and otic vesicles were formed at the lateral sides of the hindbrain.

Stage 14 (Fig. 6D; Fig. 3B2): had 36 pairs of somites. The cervical flexure inscribed a right angle. Pigmentation in the retina began and the genital tubercle below the umbilicus appeared. A pair of nasal pits was evident and appeared as a round depression. The length was equal to the width in the forelimb bud but shorter than the width in the hindlimb bud. The primordium of the propatagium and plagiopatagium appeared at the two sides of the forelimb bud. The hindlimb AER emerged.

Stage 17 (Fig. 6E; Fig. 3B3): a small part of the lower jaw could be seen from the front view of the face although much of it was hidden by the upper jaw. A pair of protuberances was present close to the eyes. In the middle of the face, the leaf-like folds of skin (nose-leaves) were shaped around the nares, although they were still rudimentary. Tissues between all the digits of the hindlimb and between the first and second digits of the forelimb regressed halfway, whereas those between other digits of the forelimb remained to form the chiropatagium. The primordium of the uropatagium emerged between the legs and the tail.

Stage 18 (Fig. 6F; Fig. 3B4): the eyelids had begun to cover the eyes. The nose-leaves became evident. There was a transverse fold and the main trough-like nose-leaf had nostrils in the middle. One fold (or supplementary leaflet) was seen on each side of the cheek. The primordium of the frontal sac was present in the middle of the forehead. The thumb was totally free and other digits on the hand had elongated. Free toes and the calcar were present. Alcian blue staining revealed 12 pairs of ribs at this stage (Fig. 4B).

Stage 19 (Fig. 7A; Fig. 3B5): more than half the face was obscured by the hand plate. The eyelids half covered the eyes at the beginning of this stage and covered most of the eyes at the end. A second fold was seen on each side of the cheek. Flexure at the wrist was apparent. Knob-like claw primordia were evident at the tip of each toe and the thumb. The legs overlapped each other. The uropatagium enclosed the whole tail by the end of this stage.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-10-10/MediaObjects/12861_2009_Article_487_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

H. armiger at embryonic Stages 19-23 and the fetal stage. (A1-A6) Stage 19. (B1-B6) Stage 22. (C1-C6) Stage 23. (D1-D6) fetal stage. (A1, B1, C1, D1) Lateral view with dorsal to the right; (A2, B2, C2, D2) Ventral view; (A3, B3, C3, D3) Dorsal view of the head and trunk; (A4, B4, C4, D4) Dorsal view of the trunk and tail; (A5, B5, C5, D5) Close-up for the left forelimb; (A6, B6, C6, D6) Close-up for the left hindlimb. a, autopod; cl, claw; cp, claw primordium; s, stylopod; z, zeugopod. Bar = 1 mm in A4, B4, C4, D4 (applies to A1-4, B1-4, C1-4, D1-4), A5-6, B5-6, C5-6 and D5-6.

Stage 20 (Fig. 3B6): eyelids covered the eyes completely. Pigmentation was evident around the nostrils. The third fold was seen on each side of the cheek. Vibrissal follicles emerged between the main nose-leaf and the mouth.

Stage 21: the overall appearance of the embryo was similar to the former stages. The nose-leaves, protuberances and the frontal sac were larger and more evident than before.

Stage 22 (Fig. 7B; Fig. 3B7): the chiropatagium, plagiopatagium and uropatagium became slack and thin as they grew. In the forelimb, the autopod was shorter than the stylopod and zeugopod (a = 9.88 mm; z = 10.25 mm; s = 10.15 mm).

Stage 23 (Fig. 7C): the overall appearance of the embryo was similar to the previous stages. In the forelimb, the autopod was a little longer than the stylopod and zeugopod (a = 13.35 mm; z = 12.34 mm; s = 12.30 mm). The entire forehead and half the face was covered by one hand with large chiropatagia between the digits.

Fetal stage (Fig. 7D; Fig. 3B8): the genital tubercle had become a vagina or a penis so gender could be distinguished. In early fetal development, fuscous pigments appeared around the nostrils. The fourth fold on each side of the cheek could be clearly seen so that the nose-leaves had achieved an adult appearance (Fig. 3B9-10). A hollow occurred in the middle of the frontal sac and it appeared earlier in the male fetuses than in the females. Pigmentation of the entire body surface increased as fetal development progressed. During late fetal development, short hairs emerged from the hollow of the frontal sac; short whiskers and vibrissae were present around the mouth and on the nose-leaves; exiguous hairs were found on the legs, arms, the dorsal surface of the tail, uropatagium, toes and thumb. Claws were sharp and keratinized.

Embryonic and fetal development of H. pratti

Stage 11 (Fig. 8A; Fig. 3C1): the characters of the embryo were very similar to H. armiger at Stage 11 (see above results).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-213X-10-10/MediaObjects/12861_2009_Article_487_Fig8_HTML.jpg
Figure 8

H. pratti at embryonic Stages 11-22. (A1-4) Stage 11. (B1-6) Stage 14. (C1-6) Stage 15. (D1-6) Stage 16. (E1-6) Stage 22. (A1, B1, C1, D1, E1) Lateral view with dorsal to the right; (A2, B2, C2, D2, E2) Ventral view; (A3, B3, C3, D3, E3) Dorsal view of the head and trunk; (A4, B4, C4, D4, E4) Dorsal view of the trunk and tail; (B5, C5, D5, E5) Close-up for the left forelimb; (B6, C6, D6, E6) Close-up for the left hindlimb. ah, auditory hillocks; al, allantois; crf, cranial flexure; cvf, cervical flexure; eam, external auditory meatus; h, heart; lv, lens vesicle; np, nasal pit; plp, plagiopatagium; pr, pigmented retina; prp, propatagium. Bar = 1 mm in A4, B4, C4, D4, E4 (applies to A1-4, B1-4, C1-4, D1-4, E1-4), D5-6 and E5-6; bar = 500 μm in B5-6 and C5-6.

Stage 14 (Fig. 8B; Fig. 3C2): specimens at Stages 14-15 had a maximum of 40 pairs of somites, so that somitogenesis was completed with 40 pairs before Stage 15. The length was longer than the width in the forelimb bud but shorter than the width in the hindlimb bud. Other characters were the same with H. armiger at Stage 14 (see above results).

Stage 15 (Fig. 8C; Fig. 3C3): the body became straighter. Pigmentation in the retina became darker and lens vesicles were evident. A wide depression, which became the external auditory meatus, was apparent between the first pharyngeal arch and the second, and above which the auditory hillocks were formed. Discoid hand plates were clearly seen, but foot plates were not evident. The primordium of the propatagium and plagiopatagium continued to extend.

Stage 16 (Fig. 8D; Fig. 3C4): a pair of nares was distinct. Nose-leaf primordia emerged beside the nares and above the eyes. The upper jaw and the lower jaw were formed, but the lower jaw was so short that it was hidden beneath the upper jaw. The external auditory meatus appeared and the auditory hillocks became pinnae and antitragus. The interdigital notches were distinctly evident in the hand plate. Foot plates were also evident and similar to the hand plates at Stage 15.

Stage 19 (Fig. 3C5): the eyelids half covered the eyes. A transverse bilobed shield between the eyes was enlarged. The nose-leaves were evident. As with H. armiger, H. pratti had a transverse fold and a main nose-leaf in the middle of the face. Beside the main nose-leaf, one fold was seen on each side of the cheek. The primordium of the frontal sac was present in the middle of the forehead. Vibrissal follicles emerged between the main nose-leaf and the mouth. The uropatagium enclosed the whole tail by the end of this stage.

Stage 20 (Fig. 3C6): eyelids covered the eyes completely. The second fold and a fold under the eyes had formed on each side of the cheek so that the nose-leaves had achieved an adult appearance (Fig. 3C9-10).

Stage 22 (Fig. 8E; Fig. 3C7): in the forelimb, the autopod was shorter than the stylopod and zeugopod (a = 10.08 mm; z = 11.80 mm; s = 11.17 mm).

Stage 23: the overall appearance of the embryo was similar to the former stages. The shield between the eyes was larger but the genital tubercle was maintained.

Fetal stage (Fig. 3C8): the genital tubercle had become a vagina or a penis so gender could be distinguished. A hollow occurred in the middle of the frontal sac. Clear differences were evident in noseleaf morphology between H. pratti and H. armiger at this stage (Fig. 3B8). Pigmentation of the entire body surface increased as fetal development progressed. Claws were sharp and keratinized.

Discussion

For the three species in this study, late embryonic stages and fetal stages were obtained mainly from April to June (Table 1). Embryonic stages of H. armiger captured on 19 Feb 2009 and 4 March 2008 were more advanced than those captured on 24 April 2009, 28 April 2008 and 22 May 2008. That is, nearly all the embryos from the bats captured during torpor (or hibernation) developed faster than those captured after arousal. We captured dozens of H. armiger from the same cave and maintained them for another study. When kept cool during January and February, they became torpid even if food was provided. This suggests that these bats hibernated as did populations of the same species at lower latitudes (23°N) [16, 17]. Although accelerated development could be the result of individual variation in the population, it is most likely due to the fact that the bats captured on 19 Feb 2009 and 4 March 2008 were artificially aroused from hibernation, kept in an elevated ambient temperature and supplied with food. Similar phenomena also occurred in other bat species, including M. schreibersii fuliginosus [20, 21].

As a whole, the organogenetic sequence of bat embryos is uniform and the embryos appear homoplastic before Stage 16 when the nose-leaf begins to form in some species. There are many common features at the same stage for all the bat species studied, summarized in table 2. The column "common features" contains the key features that can be used to identify the different stages of bat development. When these common features occur, the corresponding stage starts or is in progress. For example, neural tube and somite formation represent the beginning of Stage 10. It is difficult to find common features for all eight bat species at Stages 17, 19 and 23, because some studies did not identify stages strictly according to the staging system developed by Cretekos et al [5] and some features occurred earlier or later in C. perspicillata than in other species. In some instances, for example Stage 15, the common features are listed as lens vesicles and auditory hillocks. Although these terms were not present in the descriptions of all the bat species considered, we listed them for most species in which these features are described.

However, there are also many specific features for each species. Besides the CRL, UD and somite count, the most profound developmental differences are expected to be in craniofacial development, which is more complex in species possessed of nose-leaves (H. armiger, H. pratti and C. perspicillata). The earliest differences are evident early in embryonic Stage 14 when nasal pits are identified. In H. armiger and H. pratti these appear as round depressions, whereas in C. perspicillata they are relatively small and in other species are long grooves. More evident differences of the face start from Stage 16 when the nose-leaf primordia are formed in H. armiger, H. pratti and C. perspicillata. Although H. armiger and H. pratti are phylogenetically close, their nose-leaves develop distinct morphologies. There are four main differences of nose-leaves between these two species. First of all, H. armiger develops four folds on each side of the cheek, whereas H. pratti develops two. Secondly, H. pratti develops an evident fold under each eye, whereas H. armiger does not. Thirdly, the transverse bilobed shield between the eyes is much larger in H. pratti than in H. armiger. Finally, the part of the main fold above nostrils is bigger in H. armiger than in H. pratti. In contrast, M. schreibersii fuliginosus and M. natalensis are also phylogenetically close and their embryonic development and adult morphology are similar.

The eyelids of all eight bat species close before Stage 20, but two of them (C. perspicillata and M. rufus) reopen at embryonic Stage 22 and the others never open during prenatal development. The uropatagium does not enclose the whole tail in M. rufus and R. amplexicaudatus, but does so in other species. Many other differences occur mainly in the timing of organogenesis. For example, the foot plate formed one stage later in H. pratti than in other species. The uropatagium encloses the whole tail later in M. schreibersii fuliginosus, M. natalensis and P. abramus than in C. perspicillata because of the longer tails in the former three species.

Conclusion

Morphological differentiation of bat species is completed prenatally and occurs mainly after embryonic Stage 16 when a muzzle consisting of the nares, nose-leaves (if present), upper jaw and the lower jaw is formed. Our study provides three new bat species for interspecific comparison of post-implantation embryonic development within the order Chiroptera and detailed data on the development of nose-leaves for bats in the superfamily Rhinolophoidea.

Methods

Phylogeny construction

An illustration of phylogenic relationships of the eight bat species, which were studied for embryonic staging systems, was represented based on previous publications [2, 22].

Animal collection and breeding

All procedures involving animals were carried out in accordance with the Policy on the Care and Use of Animals, approved by the Ethical Committee, State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Several ten thousands of M. schreibersii fuliginosus, H. armiger and H.pratti roost in a large cave at Anhui province of China (30°20.263'N, 117°50.180'E). During an investigation of infectious diseases of bats, a total of 75 female M. schreibersii fuliginosus, H. armiger and H.pratti were captured using hand or mist nets on 4 March 2008, 28 April 2008, 22 May 2008, 19 Feb 2009, 24 April 2009 and 4 June 2009.

After capture, these bats were kept in a flight room (4 × 4 × 2.5 m) which was covered with wire netting on the wall and roof to allow the bats to hang. The room was kept dark all day and the temperature was maintained between 18 and 24°C. Plastic bowls (12 × 7 × 5 cm) for water and food hung on the wall and were 12 cm from the roof. Water was freely available. A diet of mealworms mixed with powdered multivitamin and calcium tablets was provided in the bowls from 2000 h to 0800 h. In the beginning, some of the bats needed to be fed by hand but after several days, they could find food by themselves, like the others.

Specimen processing

Bats in the captive colony were euthanized by decapitation. The reproductive tract was then dissected, measured, and further dissected to expose the conceptus. After dissection, specimens were fixed overnight in Bouin's fluid then washed with several changes of 70% ethyl alcohol and stored at room temperature until use. Before being photographed, specimens were cleared in 0.1% ammonium hydroxide in 70% ethyl alcohol. The whole bodies of the specimens were photographed from the lateral view, ventral view and dorsal view. Close-up of the forelimb, hindlimb and face were also photographed.

Staging bat embryos

Because the bats were already pregnant when they were caught, it was difficult to determine the exact duration of pregnancy. Thus, bat embryos were staged using the system developed by Cretekos et al [5] according to morphological characteristics. In addition, the uterus diameter (UD, the maximal diameter of each gravid uterine horn) was measured during dissection. Crown rump lengths (CRL) and stylopod, zeugopod and autopod lengths were measured after fixation and ribs were counted after skeletal analysis.

Skeletal analysis

Embryos of M. schreibersii fuliginosus at Stage 15 and H. armiger at Stage 18 were fixed overnight in Bouin's solution and cartilage stained with Alcian blue. The detailed staining method for the bat embryo is the same as for the mouse embryo [23].

Comparison of features of eight bat species

We summarized features in each stage for the three bat species from this study and used the data of other five species from previous publications [48]. If all or most of the species possess the same feature and this feature is not described in other stages, it was classified as "common features", and others were classified as "specific features".

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Ruiliang Zhu for the provision of microscope. This work was funded by a grant awarded to S. Zhang under the Key Construction Program of the National "985" Project and "211" Project.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University
(2)
Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(3)
School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen

References

  1. Wilson DE, Reeder DM: Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. 2005, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Teeling EC, Springer MS, Madsen O, Bates P, O'Brien SJ, Murphy WJ: A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science. 2005, 307: 580-584. 10.1126/science.1105113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Crichton EG, Krutzsch PH: Reproductive biology of bats. 2000, London Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Hockman D, Mason MK, Jacobs DS, Illing N: The Role of Early Development in Mammalian Limb Diversification: A Descriptive Comparison of Early Limb Development Between the Natal Long-Fingered Bat (Miniopterus natalensis) and the Mouse (Mus musculus). Dev Dyn. 2009, 238 (4): 965-979. 10.1002/dvdy.21896.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cretekos CJ, Weatherbee SD, Chen CH, Badwaik NK, Niswander L, Behringer RR, Rasweiler JJ: Embryonic staging system for the short-tailed fruit bat, Carollia perspicillata, a model organism for the mammalian order Chiroptera, based upon timed pregnancies in captive-bred animals. Dev Dyn. 2005, 233: 721-738. 10.1002/dvdy.20400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Tokita M: Normal embryonic development of the Japanese pipistrelle, Pipistrellus abramus. Zool. 2006, 109: 137-147. 10.1016/j.zool.2005.12.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Giannini N, Goswami A, Sanchez-Villagra MR: Development of integumentary structures in Rousettus amplexicaudatus (Mammalia: Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) during late-embryonic and fetal stages. J Mammal. 2006, 87: 993-1001. 10.1644/06-MAMM-A-016R1.1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Nolte MJ, Hockman D, Cretekos CJ, Behringer RR, Rasweiler JJ: Embryonic Staging System for the Black Mastiff Bat, Molossus rufus (Molossidae), Correlated With Structure-Function Relationships in the Adult. Anatomical Record. 2009, 292 (2): 155-168. 10.1002/ar.20835.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Pavey CR, Grunwald JE, Neuweiler G: Foraging habitat and echolocation behaviour of Schneider's leaf nosed bat, Hipposideros speoris, in a vegetation mosaic in Sri Lanka. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2001, 50: 209-218. 10.1007/s002650100363.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Neuweiler G: The biology of bats. 2000, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Maeda K: Studies on the classification of Miniopterus in Eurasia, Australia and Melanesia. Honyurui Kagaku (Mammal Sci). 1982, 1-176. Suppl 1
  12. Simmons NB: Order Chiroptera. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Edited by: Wilson DE, Reeder DM. 2005, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 312-529. 3Google Scholar
  13. Mori T, Uchida TA: Ultrastructural observations of ovulation in the Japanese long-fingered bat, Miniopterus schreibersii fuliginosus. J Reprod Fertil. 1981, 63: 391-395. 10.1530/jrf.0.0630391.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mori T, Uchida TA: Ultrastructural observations of fertilization in the Japanese long-fingered bat, Miniopterus schreibersii fuliginosus. J Reprod Fertil. 1981, 63: 231-235. 10.1530/jrf.0.0630231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kimura K, Uchida TA: Ultrastructural observations of delayed implantation in the Japanese long-fingered bat, Miniopterus schreibersii fuliginosus. J Reprod Fertil. 1983, 69: 187-193. 10.1530/jrf.0.0690187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ho YY, Lee LL: Roost selection by Formosan leaf-nosed bats (Hipposideros armiger terasensis). Zoolog Sci. 2003, 20 (8): 1017-1024. 10.2108/zsj.20.1017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng HC, Lee LL: Temporal variations in the size and composition of Formosan leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros terasensis) colonies in central Taiwan. Zoological Studies. 2004, 43 (4): 787-794.Google Scholar
  18. Chen JW: Reproductive ecology of Taiwan leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros terasensis) in Chungliau area, Nantou county. Master's thesis. 1998, Taichung: Tunghai UniversityGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomas O: Descriptions of three new bats in the British Museum collection. Ann Mag Nat Hist. 1891, 7: 527-530.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Racey PA: Environmental factors affecting the length of gestation in heterothermic bats. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1973, 19: 175-189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Uchida TA, Inoue C, Kimura K: Effects of elevated temperatures on the embryonic development and corpus luteum activity in the Japanese long-fingered bat, Miniopterus schreibersii fuliginosus. J Reprod Fertil. 1984, 71 (2): 439-444. 10.1530/jrf.0.0710439.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller-Butterworth CM, Murphy WJ, O'Brien SJ, Jacobs DS, Springer MS, Teeling EC: A family matter: Conclusive resolution of the taxonomic position of the long-fingered bats, Miniopterus. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (7): 1553-1561. 10.1093/molbev/msm076.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Morriss-Kay GM: Treatment of mice with retinoids in vivo and in vitro: skeletal staining. Molecular embryology: methods and protocols. Edited by: Sharpe PT, Mason I. 1999, Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 33-39. full_text.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement